Articles by Alvin Brown
Tax Preparation
Offer In Compromise
State Offers in Compromise
Levy
IRS Tax Liens
IRS Tax Liens - continued
IRS Tax Liens - continued 2
Levy - continued
IRS Audits
Audit Techniques Guide
Congressional Contacts
Criminal Investigation
D.O.J Criminal Tax Manual
Tax Litigation
Penalty
Installment Agreements
Statute of Limitations
Frivolous Tax Argument
Interest Abatement
IRS Misconduct
IRS Abuses
Tax Fraud
Fraud Statutes
Bankruptcy
Tax Reform Legislation
Tax Shelters
Tax Court
Trust Fund Penalty
Legislation
Innocent Spouse Relief
Important Links
|
Penalty
- 20.1
Penalty Handbook
- 20.1.1
Introduction
and Penalty Relief
- 20.1.2
Failure
To File/Failure To Pay Penalties
- 20.1.3
Estimated
Tax Penalties
- 20.1.3
Estimated
Tax Penalties (Cont. 1)
- 20.1.4
Failure
to Deposit Penalty
- 20.1.4
Failure
to Deposit Penalty (Cont. 1)
- 20.1.4
Failure
to Deposit Penalty (Cont. 2)
- 20.1.5
Return
Related Penalties
- 20.1.5
Return
Related Penalties (Cont. 1)
- 20.1.6
Preparer/Promoter
Penalties
- 20.1.6
Preparer/Promoter
Penalties (Cont. 1)
- 20.1.7
Information
Return Penalties
- 20.1.7
Information
Return Penalties (Cont. 1)
- 20.1.8
Employee
Plans and Exempt Organizations Penalties
- 20.1.8
Employee
Plans and Exempt Organizations Penalties
(Cont. 1)
- 20.1.9
International
Penalties
- 20.1.9
International
Penalties (Cont. 1)
- 20.1.10
Miscellaneous
Penalties
- 20.1.10
Miscellaneous
Penalties (Cont. 1)
20.1.1.1
(08-20-1998)
Overview
- This section
discusses the new chapter format of the
Penalty IRM 20.1. It also includes the purpose
of penalties, criteria for penalty relief,
methods of appealing penalties, master file
indicators and administrative procedures.
20.1.1.1.1
(08-20-1998)
Background
- In 1955
there were approximately 14 penalty
provisions in the Internal Revenue Code.
There are now more than ten times that
number. With the increasing number of
penalty provisions, the Service recognized
the need to develop a fair, consistent, and
comprehensive approach to penalty
administration.
- In November
1987 the Commissioner established a task
force to study civil penalties; in February
1989 the Commissioner’s Executive Task Force
issued a "Report on Civil Tax Penalties."
The report established a philosophy
concerning penalties, provided a statutory
analysis of the three broad categories of
penalties (filing of returns, payment of
tax, accuracy of information), and made
recommendations where warranted to resolve
the inconsistencies. Those recommendations
were, in part:
- The
Service should develop and adopt a
single penalty policy statement
emphasizing that civil tax penalties
exist for the purpose of encouraging
voluntary compliance.
- The
Service should develop a single
consolidated handbook on penalties for
all employees. The handbook should be
sufficiently detailed to serve as a
practical everyday guide for most issues
of penalty administration and provide
clear guidance on computing penalties.
- The
Service should revise existing training
programs to ensure consistent
administration of penalties in all
functions for the purpose of encouraging
voluntary compliance.
- The
Service should examine its
communications with taxpayers (including
penalty notices and publications) to
determine whether these communications
do the best possible job of explaining
why the penalty was imposed and how to
avoid the penalty in the future.
- The
Service should finalize its review and
analysis of the quality and clarity of
machine-generated letters and notices
used in the Adjustments and
Correspondence Branches of the service
centers.
- The
Service should consider ways to develop
better information concerning the
administration and effects of penalties.
The Service should develop a master file
database to provide statistical
information regarding the administration
of penalties. That information would be
continuously reviewed for the purpose of
suggesting changes in compliance
programs, educational programs, penalty
design and penalty administration.
- In keeping
with the Commissioner’s Executive Task Force
Report and Congressional recommendations,
the consolidated penalty IRM was developed.
20.1.1.1.2
(08-20-1998)
Purpose of IRM 20.1
- The purpose
of the consolidated penalty handbook is to
provide guidance to all areas of the Service
for all penalties imposed by the Internal
Revenue Code. It sets forth procedures both
for assessing and abating penalties and
contains discussions on topics such as
various types of relief from the penalties.
- IRM 20.1
replaces all other internal management
documents dealing with the administration of
penalties, such as IRMs and handbooks
developed by various functions. IRM 20.1 is
the primary source of authority for the
administration of penalties by the Service.
Service functions may develop reference
materials for their individual needs, such
as desk guides. However, such reference
material must
receive approval from the Penalties and
Interest Office prior to distribution and
remain consistent with (a) the procedures
set forth in this IRM, and (b) the
philosophy of the penalty policy statement.
- The penalty
manual serves as the foundation for
addressing inconsistent administration of
penalties by various Service functions. By
providing one source of authority for the
administration of penalties, the Service
greatly reduces inconsistencies regarding
attitudes and
procedures.
20.1.1.1.3
(08-20-1998)
Organization of IRM 20.1
- This manual
is arranged in a user-friendly format. The
chapters follow the logical sequence of
events when working a penalty case.
Appropriate headings are provided which
describe the text that follows.
- The manual
is designed for use both as an everyday
reference guide and as a training document.
Figures and examples are included in the
text where they are most useful. Figures
which are referenced frequently throughout
the text are included as chapter exhibits to
conserve space.
- The manual
contains criteria, guidelines, and
procedures for asserting, not asserting, and
abating penalties. Chapters are included
covering the penalty policy statement and
philosophy, the application of reasonable
cause, and the procedures for penalty
appeals. The sections in IRM 20.1 are:
- 20.1,
20.1.1,
Background; 20.1.2,
Purpose of Penalties;
20.1.3, Relief from
Penalties; 20.1.4,
Methods of Appealing Penalties;
20.1.5,
Master File Indicators;
20.1.6,
Administrative Procedures and Exhibits.
- 20.1.2,
Failure to File/Failure to Pay, IRC
section 6651.
- 20.1.3,
Estimated Tax Penalties (ES). IRC
section 6654 (Individual) and IRC
section 6655 (Corporate).
- 20.1.4,
Failure to Deposit Penalties (FTD)
- 20.1.5,
Return Related Penalties
- 20.1.6,
Preparer/Promoter Penalties
- 20.1.7,
Information Return Penalties
- 20.1.8,
Employee Plans/Exempt Organizations
- 20.1.9,
International Penalties
- 20.1.10,
Miscellaneous Penalties
- This section
contains Exhibits to assist the user in
researching penalty issues:
-
20.1.1–1, Penalty Policy Statement
-
20.1.1–2, Penalty Relief Application
Chart
-
20.1.1–3, Penalty Reason Code Chart
-
20.1.1–4, Penalty Transaction Codes
-
20.1.1–5, Penalty Reference Numbers—500
Series
-
20.1.1–6, Penalty Reference Numbers—600
Series
-
20.1.1–7, Table of Abbreviations and
Acronyms
-
20.1.1–8, Dictionary of Key Terms.
20.1.1.1.4
(08-20-1998)
Responsibility
- Overall
responsibility for penalty programs is
assigned to the Penalties and Interest
Office (OPIA). The OPIA is a matrix
organization residing in Reporting
Compliance (Small Business/Self Employed)
Division. The OPIA is charged with
coordinating policy and procedures
concerning the administration of penalty
programs, ensuring consistency with the
penalty policy statement, reviewing and
analyzing penalty information, researching
taxpayer attitudes and opinions, and
determining appropriate action necessary to
promote voluntary compliance.
- Every
function is the Service has a role in proper
penalty administration. It is essential that
each function conduct its operations with an
emphasis on promoting voluntary compliance.
Appropriate business reviews should be
conducted to ensure consistency with the
penalty policy statement and philosophy.
Attention should be directed to the
coordination of penalty programs between
offices and functions, to make sure that
approaches are consistent and penalty
information is used for identifying and
responding to compliance problems.
- Managers
should continuously review information for
trends which may suggest changes in
compliance programs, training courses,
educational programs, penalty design, and
penalty administration. Managers should
institute, on an ongoing basis, a quality
review system that evaluates the timely and
correct disposition of penalty cases and
encourages consistent administration of
penalties.
- All
employees should keep the following
objectives in mind when handling each
penalty case:
- Similar
cases and similarly situated taxpayers
should be treated alike.
- Each
taxpayer should have the opportunity to
have their interests heard and
considered.
- Strive
to make a good decision in the first
instance. A wrong decision, even though
eventually corrected, has a negative
impact on voluntary compliance.
- Provide
adequate opportunity for incorrect
decisions to be
corrected.
- Treat
each case in an impartial and honest way
(i.e., approach the job, not from the
government’s or the taxpayer’s
perspective, but in the interest of fair
and impartial enforcement of the tax
laws).
- Use each
penalty case as an opportunity to
educate the taxpayer, help the taxpayer
understand their legal obligations and
rights, and assist the taxpayer in
understanding their appeal rights and,
in all cases, observe the taxpayer’s
procedural rights.
- Endeavor
to promptly process and resolve each
taxpayer’s case.
- Resolve
each penalty case in a manner which
promotes voluntary compliance.
20.1.1.1.5
(08-20-1998)
Administrative Information
- This section
provides information on requesting changes,
updating, and submitting proposed changes to
IRM 20.1. It also provides security
standards for this IRM.
20.1.1.1.5.1 (08-20-1998)
Requesting Changes and Updating IRM 20.1
- The
Penalties and Interest Office (OPIA) has
overall responsibility for coordinating
and approving any update to IRM 20.1.
OPIA’s role is to ensure consistency in
penalty administration.
- The
offices of the Director, Compliance and
Field Territory Managers in the functional
areas are responsible for the initiation
and content of Policy Statements, Manual
Transmittals, and Manual Supplements
necessary to maintain IRM 20.1 on a
current basis. This responsibility
includes:
-
Initially determining the need for an
amendment of, or announcement calling
attention to, provisions in IRM 20.1.
-
Deciding whether a revision will be in
the form of a Manual Transmittal for a
direct and immediate update to the
Manual or a Manual Supplement
prescribing procedures for a temporary
implementation period before inclusion
in the Manual (direct amendment by
Manual Transmittal is preferable).
-
Ensuring accuracy and completeness of
any revision and providing a statement
regarding the effect on functional
documents and other provisions of the
Manual.
-
Ensuring revisions and announcements
conform with the style and format of
the IRM.
-
Coordinating proposed revisions and
announcements with other units within
a function, other functions as
appropriate, and the OPIA.
- Prior
to implementing these changes,
obtaining approval from the OPIA.
- If special
instructions are issued "in an emergency
situation" , see text of Internal
Management Document System Handbook. A
copy of the document must also be
furnished to the OPIA within 30 days of
issuing the special instructions.
20.1.1.1.5.2 (08-20-1998)
Submitting Proposed Changes to IRM 20.1
- Functions
in the field (area or service center)
should follow the instructions currently
in the Internal Management Document System
Handbook. This IRM will provide local
instructions for submission of proposed
changes to National Headquarters.
-
Headquarters personnel in the appropriate
areas will forward the corrections as
appropriate.
- All
areas must forward the requested
change, in writing, to OPIA, and OPIA
will coordinate the requested change
through the document clearance
process.
-
Corrections and updates will be
verified, as appropriate, before they
are incorporated into IRM 20.1.
20.1.1.1.5.3 (08-20-1998)
Security Standards
- Service
officials and managers must communicate
security standards contained in the
Manager’s Security Handbook to subordinate
employees and establish methods to enforce
them.
- Employees
are responsible for taking required
precautions to provide security for the
documents, information, and property which
they handle in performing official duties.
- Employees
using IDRS should only access those
accounts required to accomplish their
official duties. Any unauthorized access
or browsing of tax accounts by employees
is prohibited by the Service.
-
Browsing is defined as looking at a
tax account to satisfy a personal
curiosity or for fraudulent reasons.
-
Unauthorized access to taxpayer
information is subject to disciplinary
action including dismissal from the
Service.
20.1.1.1.6
(08-20-1998)
Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Guidelines
- While the
Service is always striving to improve its
systems and provide better service, some
taxpayers still have difficulty obtaining a
solution to a problem or an appropriate
response to an inquiry. The purpose of TAS
is to give taxpayers someone to speak for
them within the Service—an advocate. TAS
guarantees that taxpayers will have someone
to make sure their rights are protected,
someone to turn to when the system is not
responsive to their needs. TAS steps in and
takes action on behalf of taxpayers when
their complaints or inquiries concerning
problems related to Federal taxes meet TAS
criteria. The purpose of the criteria is to
ensure that problems and complaints which
have not been handled properly through
normal channels are included in TAS.
- To make sure
that all taxpayer problems receive equal
consideration, employees should accept the
taxpayer’s statement of the problem at face
value when deciding if the complaint or
inquiry meets TAS criteria. However,
employees should be aware that TAS is not
intended to be used to circumvent their
responsibility for resolving overage or
difficult cases.
- In applying
the criteria, it is necessary to use good
judgement and to screen or probe the
situation to determine if the complaint or
inquiry should be included in the program.
- A complaint
or inquiry which meets any of the following
conditions will be included in the TAS:
- Any
Service contact on the same case at
least 30 days after an initial inquiry
or complaint; or the second contact
after 60 days from the filing of an
original or amended return or claim.
- Any
contact that indicates the taxpayer has
not received a response by the date
promised (including commitment dates on
IRS forms).
- Any
contact that indicates established
systems have failed, or it is in the
best interest of the taxpayer or the
Service that the case be worked in TAS.
- A complaint
or inquiry does not need to be sent to TAS
if the problem has been corrected or will be
resolved by completing
all required actions and
responding to the taxpayer (by telephone,
preparing written correspondence, or sending
an IDRS letter) on the same
date the
case is identified as meeting TAS criteria.
- Although the
complaint or inquiry may appear to meet TAS
criteria, e.g., second contact on the same
issue, there will be instances when certain
contacts should not be included in TAS:
- When it
can be determined that the taxpayer has
not used, or refuses to use, established
administrative or formal appeals
procedures, or
- When the
complaint or inquiry only questions the
constitutionality of the tax system.
- Please keep
in mind that a "nonfilers" can have a
legitimate problem which should be handled
by TAS.
- Items
meeting TAS criteria may be discovered at
any point in the processing cycle. If the
item or case meets TAS criteria, the case
should be referred to the supervisor for
referral to TAS.
20.1.1.1.7
(08-20-1998)
Form 911—ATAO
- Form 911,
Application for a Taxpayer Assistance Order
to Relieve Hardship (ATAO) may be initiated
by a Service employee on behalf of the
taxpayer to request review of an account if:
- The
taxpayer is experiencing or about to
experience a "significant hardship" ;
and
- The
non-TAS employee dealing with the
problem cannot or will not relieve that
hardship immediately.
- The Service
may receive cases
that qualify for an ATAO directly
from the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s
authorized representative (Form 911); or,
through telephone contact or letter.
- Use normal
procedures and the appeal processes before
resorting to an ATAO. However, if these
procedures or processes are not appropriate
because they will not be timely in resolving
the hardship or were not followed and a
"significant hardship" exists, consider
requesting an ATAO. It is never wrong to
consider whether an ATAO is appropriate.
-
"Significant hardship"
is a highly subjective
determination. A number of factors must be
considered when making a determination of
"significant hardship" . Enforcement action,
in and of itself, is not a hardship without
additional factors. For this reason, using
good judgement after reviewing the pertinent
facts and circumstances is the most
important element in reaching the fair and
reasonable decision.
- Significant
hardship consideration must be made on a
case by case basis. The Taxpayer Advocate
(PRO) will make the final decision. To
properly evaluate a hardship situation,
consider the following points:
- Will the
taxpayer be able to
retain
housing?
- Will the
taxpayer be able to
obtain food?
- Will the
taxpayer be able to
retain
utilities?
- Will the
taxpayer be able to
retain or
obtain transportation to and
from work?
- Will the
taxpayer be able to
remain
employed?
- Will the
taxpayer be able to
obtain
essential medical treatment and/or
medication?
- Will the
taxpayer be able to
obtain
reasonable clothing and/or shoes?
- Will the
taxpayer sustain an
avoidable
loss of education?
- Will
irreparable
damage be caused to the
taxpayer’s credit rating?
- Will the
taxpayer be
unable to meet payroll and/or
be in
imminent danger of bankruptcy?
- Is the
hardship imminent?
- Below are
some examples of
potential "significant hardship"
cases.
- A wage
levy that impaired the taxpayer’s
ability to purchase needed medication or
medical care. The Service’s lack of
awareness causes an unintentional
negative impact and would qualify for an
ATAO if the employee contacted cannot or
will not relieve the hardship.
- A
payment is improperly applied to a
taxpayer’s account, thus blocking the
taxpayer’s receipt of a refund. After
many contacts with the Service,
substantiated with dates, the taxpayer
is suffering emotional stress and files
a Form 911 for relief. An ATAO is
appropriate to request action to
substantiate the credit and authorize
the refund.
- Below are
some examples of cases which
DO NOT
show "significant hardship" .
- A
taxpayer is experiencing a significant
hardship because of a bank levy on his
sole source of funds. The employee
contacted is able to release the levy
and initiate a payment agreement with
the taxpayer. Because the employee
resolved the hardship, an ATAO would not
be warranted.
- The
taxpayer complains that he will not be
able to pay both the tax liability and
the rent this month. The taxpayer has
been current on previous rent payments,
and the landlord has not contacted the
taxpayer about the rent. The state where
the taxpayer lives requires 60 days
prior notice before eviction proceedings
can begin. Because there is no
imminent
hardship, an ATAO would not be
warranted.
-
Action required:
-
Immediately prepare Form 911 upon
receipt of any telephone call,
correspondence, or claim which shows
need for an ATAO for which the non-TAS
employee cannot or will not provide
relief. Prepare Form 911 even if the
taxpayer does not specifically ask for
an ATAO. Attach the source document, if
any, to Form 911. Functional management
review is permissible, but should not
delay the Form 911 in getting to the
PRO. If functional management decides to
provide the relief requested for
internally identified Forms 911, they
need not go to the PRO.
- Route
all Forms 911 (including statute cases)
to the TAS office immediately.
- Do not
advise taxpayers that their case is
being made an ATAO. The TAS office will
respond to the taxpayer as necessary.
- Refer to
the Problem Resolution Program Handbook
for additional information on
"significant hardship" and ATAO
processing
instructions.
- You may
discover items meeting TAS criteria at any
point in the processing cycle. If the issue
or case meets any of the criteria, forward
it to TAS.
-
Note:the
ATAO procedure will not result in
forgiveness of a valid tax liability. It
only delays enforcement action, if
appropriate.
20.1.1.2
(08-20-1998)
Purpose of Penalties
- Penalties
exist to encourage voluntary compliance by
supporting the standards of behavior expected
by the Internal Revenue Code.
- For most
taxpayers, voluntary compliance consists of
preparing an accurate return, filing it
timely, and paying any tax due. Efforts made
to fulfill these obligations constitute
compliant behavior. Most penalties apply to
behavior that fails to meet any or all of
these obligations.
- Penalties
encourage voluntary compliance by:
- Defining
standards of compliant behavior,
- Defining
remedial consequences for noncompliance,
and
- Providing
monetary sanctions against taxpayers who
do not meet the standard.
- These three
factors support the public conviction that the
tax system is fair and the penalty is in
proportion to the severity of the
noncompliance.
20.1.1.2.1
(08-20-1998)
Encouraging Voluntary Compliance
- Taxpayers in
the United States assess their tax
liabilities against themselves and pay them
voluntarily. This system of assessment and
payment is based on the principle of
voluntary compliance. Voluntary compliance
exists when taxpayers conform to the law
without compulsion or threat.
- Compliant
self-assessment requires a taxpayer to know
the rules for filing returns and paying
taxes. The Service is responsible for
providing information to taxpayers, which
includes:
- Written
materials that clearly explain the
rules.
- Forms
that permit the self-computation of tax
liability.
- In addition
to (2) above, the Service must also provide
a means to preserve and enhance our
voluntary compliance by fairly,
consistently, and accurately administering a
system of penalties.
- Although
penalties support and encourage voluntary
compliance, they also serve to bring
additional revenues into the Treasury,
impose remedial charges against taxpayers,
and indirectly fund enforcement costs.
However, these results are not reasons for
creating or imposing penalties.
- Penalties
advance the mission of the Service when they
encourage voluntary compliance. The Service
has formalized this obligation to the public
in its Mission Statement.
- Compliance
is achieved when a taxpayer makes a good
faith effort to meet the tax obligations
defined by the Internal Revenue Code.
- Penalties
support voluntary compliance by assuring
compliant taxpayers that tax offenders are
identified and penalized.
- The Service
has the obligation to advance the fairness
and effectiveness of the tax system.
Penalties should:
- Be
severe enough to deter noncompliance.
-
Encourage noncompliant taxpayers to
comply.
- Be
objectively proportioned to the offense.
- Be used
as an opportunity to educate taxpayers
and encourage their future compliance.
- Service
personnel may educate taxpayers and
encourage their future compliance by:
-
Discussing causes for the delinquency
and listening to taxpayer’s reasons and
concerns for noncompliance,
- Ensuring
that taxpayers understand their filing
and paying responsibilities, and
- Being
alert to information received in
discussions with taxpayers that indicate
possible reasons for abatement of a
penalty.
- Penalties
should relate to the standards of behavior
they encourage. Penalties best aid voluntary
compliance if they support belief in the
fairness and effectiveness of the tax
system. This belief encourages compliance in
areas that cannot be reached through audits
or other programs. The Service’s approach to
penalties is embodied in Penalty Policy
Statement P–1–18 (see Exhibit 20.1.1–1.)
20.1.1.2.2
(08-20-1998)
Fair and Consistent Approach to Penalty
Administration
- The
Service’s approach to penalty administration
must ensure:
-
Consistency:
The Service should apply
penalties equally in similar situations.
Taxpayers base their perceptions about
the fairness of the system on their own
experience and the information they
receive from the media and others. If
the Service does not administer
penalties uniformly (guided by the
applicable statutes, regulations, and
procedures) overall confidence in the
tax system is jeOPIArdized.
-
Accuracy:
The Service must arrive at
the correct penalty decision. Accuracy
is essential. Erroneous penalty
assessments and incorrect calculations
confuse taxpayers and misrepresent the
overall competency of the Service.
-
Impartiality:
Service employees are
responsible for administering the
penalty statutes in an even-handed
manner that is fair and impartial to
both the government and the taxpayer.
-
Representation:
Taxpayers must be given the opportunity
to have their interests heard and
considered. Employees need to take an
active and objective role in case
resolution so that all factors are
considered.
20.1.1.3
(08-20-1998)
Relief From Penalties
- Generally,
relief from penalties falls into four separate
categories. They are:
- Reasonable
Cause
- Statutory
Exceptions
-
Administrative Waivers
- Correction
of Service Error.
- Appeals may
recommend the abatement or nonassertion of a
penalty based on these four criteria as well
as "Hazards of Litigation."
- This chapter
discusses each of these categories and the
related criteria. Also, see LEM 20.1.3.
- In the
interest of fairness, the Service will
consider requests for penalty relief received
from third parties, including requests from
representatives without an authorized power of
attorney. While information may be accepted,
NO taxpayer
information may be discussed with a third
party, unless a power of attorney or other
acceptable authorization is secured in writing
from the taxpayer. See LEM 20.1..3.
- If
additional information is needed, contact
the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized
representative.
- If the
validity of the request is questionable,
contact the taxpayer.
- In all
cases involving third party requests for
penalty relief, advise the taxpayer of the
request and the action taken.
20.1.1.3.1
(08-20-1998)
Reasonable Cause
- Reasonable
cause is based on all the facts and
circumstances in each situation and allows
the Service to provide relief from a penalty
that would otherwise be assessed. Reasonable
cause relief is generally granted when the
taxpayer exercises ordinary business care
and prudence in determining their tax
obligations but is unable to comply with
those obligations.
- In the
interest of equitable treatment of the
taxpayer and effective tax administration,
the nonassertion or abatement of civil
penalties based on reasonable cause or other
relief provisions provided in this IRM must
be made in a
consistent manner and should
conform with the considerations specified in
the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), Regulations
(Treas. Regs.), Policy Statements, and Part
20.1.
- Reasonable
cause relief is not available for all
penalties; however, other exceptions may
apply.
- For
those penalties where reasonable cause
can be considered, any reason which
establishes that the taxpayer exercised
ordinary business care and prudence, but
was unable to comply with a prescribed
duty within the prescribed time, will be
considered.
- See IRM
Exhibit 20.1.1–2, Penalty
Relief-Application Chart. If a
reasonable cause provision applies only
to a specific Code section, that
reasonable cause provision will be
discussed in the IRM 20.1 chapter
relating to that IRC section.
- When
considering the information provided in
the following pages, remember that an
acceptable explanation is
not
limited to those given in IRM 20.1.
Penalty relief granted because the
taxpayer provided an "other acceptable
explanation" is identified by use of PRC
30 on either the closing or adjustment
document.
- The wording
used to describe reasonable cause provisions
varies. Some IRC penalty sections also
require evidence that the taxpayer acted in
good faith or that the taxpayer’s failure to
comply with the law was not due to willful
neglect. See specific IRM sections for the
rules that apply to a specific Code section.
- Taxpayers
have reasonable cause when their conduct
justifies the nonassertion or abatement of a
penalty. Each case must be judged
individually based on the facts and
circumstances at hand. Consider the
following in conjunction with specific
criteria identified in the remainder of IRM
20.1.1.3.
- What
happened and when did it happen?
- During
the period of time the taxpayer was
non-compliant, what facts and
circumstances prevented the taxpayer
from filing a return, paying a tax, or
otherwise complying with the law?
- How did
the facts and circumstances prevent the
taxpayer from complying?
- How did
the taxpayer handle the remainder of
their affairs during this time?
- Once the
facts and circumstances changed, what
attempt did the taxpayer make to comply?
- Reasonable
cause does not exist
if, after the facts and circumstances that
explain the taxpayer’s noncompliant behavior
cease to exist, the taxpayer fails to comply
with the tax obligation within a reasonable
period of time.
20.1.1.3.1.1 (08-20-1998)
Standards
- Any reason
that establishes a taxpayer exercised
ordinary business care and prudence but
was unable to comply with the tax law may
be considered for penalty relief.
- The
following regulations contain examples of
circumstances that may be helpful in
determining if a taxpayer has established
reasonable cause:
-
Accuracy-Related Penalty: 1.6664–4
-
Failure to Pay Penalty: 301.6651–1(c)
-
Failure to File: 301.6651–1(c)
-
Failure to Deposit Penalty:
301.6656–1(b); 301.6656–2(c)
-
Information Returns Penalty:
301.6723–1A(d); 301.6724–1
-
Preparer/Promoter Penalties:
1.6694–2(d); 301.6707–1T.
- The
following Internal Revenue Service Policy
Statements contain specific criteria that
may affect the imposition of penalties.
- P–2–4,
Penalties and interest not asserted
against Federal agencies.
- P–2–7,
Reasonable cause for late filing of
return or failure to deposit or pay
tax when due.
- P–2–9,
Timely mailed returns bearing foreign
postmarks.
-
P–2–11, Certain unsigned returns will
be accepted for processing.
20.1.1.3.1.2 (08-20-1998)
Ordinary Business Care and Prudence
- Ordinary
business care and prudence includes making
provision for business obligations to be
met when reasonably foreseeable events
occur. A taxpayer may establish reasonable
cause by providing facts and circumstances
showing the taxpayer exercised ordinary
business care and prudence (taking that
degree of care that a reasonably prudent
person would exercise), but nevertheless
was unable to comply with the law.
- In
determining if the taxpayer exercised
ordinary business care and prudence,
review available information including the
following:
-
Taxpayer’s
Reason. The taxpayer’s
reason should address the penalty
imposed. To show reasonable cause, the
dates and explanations should clearly
correspond with events on which the
penalties are based. If the dates and
explanations do not correspond to the
events on which the penalties are
based, request additional information
from the taxpayer that may clarify the
explanation (See IRM 20.1.1.3.1).
-
Compliance
History. Check the
preceding tax years (at least 2) for
payment patterns and the taxpayer’s
overall compliance history. The same
penalty, previously assessed or
abated, may indicate that the taxpayer
is not exercising ordinary business
care. If this is the taxpayer’s first
incident of noncompliant behavior,
weigh this factor with other reasons
the taxpayer gives for reasonable
cause, since a first time failure to
comply does not by itself establish
reasonable cause.
-
Length of Time.
Consider the length of time between
the event cited as a reason for the
noncompliance and subsequent
compliance. See IRM 20.1.1.3.1.
Consider: (1) when the act was
required by law, (2) the period of
time during which the taxpayer was
unable to comply with the law due to
circumstances beyond the taxpayer’s
control, and (3) when the taxpayer
complied with the law.
-
Circumstances
Beyond the Taxpayer’s Control.
Consider whether or not the taxpayer
could have anticipated the event that
caused the noncompliance. Reasonable
cause is
generally established when
the taxpayer exercises ordinary
business care and prudence but, due to
circumstances beyond the taxpayer’s
control, the taxpayer was unable to
timely meet the tax obligation. The
taxpayer’s obligation to meet the tax
law requirements is ongoing. Ordinary
business care and prudence requires
that the taxpayer continue to attempt
to meet the requirements, even though
late.
- Abatement
of a penalty because the taxpayer
established ordinary business care and
prudence is identified by the use of
Penalty Reason Code (PRC) 22.
20.1.1.3.1.2.1 (08-20-1998)
Ignorance of the Law
- In some
instances taxpayers may not be aware of
specific obligations to file and/or pay
taxes. The
ordinary business care and prudence
standardrequires that
taxpayers make reasonable efforts to
determine their tax obligations.
Reasonable cause may be established if
the taxpayer shows ignorance of the law
in conjunction with other facts and
circumstances.
- For
example, consider:
- The
taxpayer’s education,
- If
the taxpayer has been subject to the
tax,
- If
the taxpayer has been penalized, or
- If
there were recent changes in the tax
forms or law which a taxpayer could
not reasonably be expected to know.
- The
level of complexity of a tax or
compliance issue is another factor that
should be considered in evaluating
reasonable cause because of ignorance of
the law.
-
Reasonable cause should never be
presumed, even in cases where ignorance
of the law is claimed.
- The
taxpayer may have reasonable cause for
noncompliance if:
- A
reasonable and good faith effort was
made to comply with the law, or
- The
taxpayer was unaware of a
requirement and could not reasonably
be expected to know of the
requirement.
20.1.1.3.1.2.2 (08-20-1998)
Mistake was Made
- The
taxpayer may try to establish reasonable
cause by claiming that a mistake was
made.
-
Generally, this is not in keeping
with the
ordinary business care and prudence
standardand does not
provide a basis for reasonable
cause.
-
However, the reason for the mistake
may be a supporting factor if
additional facts and circumstances
support the determination that the
taxpayer exercised ordinary business
care and prudence.
20.1.1.3.1.2.3 (08-20-1998)
Forgetfulness
- The
taxpayer may try to establish reasonable
cause by claiming forgetfulness or an
oversight by the taxpayer or another
party caused the noncompliance.
Generally, this is not in keeping with
ordinary business
care and prudence standard
and does not provide a basis for
reasonable cause.
-
Relying on another person to perform
a required act is generally not
sufficient for establishing
reasonable cause.
- It
is the taxpayer’s responsibility to
file a timely and accurate return
and to make timely deposits or
payments. This responsibility cannot
be delegated.
-
Information to consider when evaluating
a request for an abatement or
nonassertion of a penalty based on a
mistake or a claim of ignorance of the
law includes, but is not limited to:
- When
and how the taxpayer became aware of
the mistake.
- The
extent to which the taxpayer
corrected the mistake.
- The
relationship between the taxpayer
and the subordinate.
- If
the taxpayer took timely steps to
correct the failure after it was
discovered.
- The
supporting documentation.
20.1.1.3.1.2.4 (08-20-1998)
Death, Serious Illness, or Unavoidable
Absence
- Death,
serious illness or unavoidable absence
of the taxpayer may establish reasonable
cause for late filing, payment, or
deposit for the following:
- An
individual: If
there was a death, serious illness,
or unavoidable absence of the
taxpayer or a death or serious
illness in the taxpayer’s immediate
family (i.e. spouse, sibling,
parents, grandparents, children).
PRC 24indicates
the incident occurred to the
individual or a member of that
individual’s immediate family for
filing, paying, or depositing.
- A
corporation, estate, trust
, etc.:If there was a
death, serious illness, or other
unavoidable absence of the taxpayer
(or a member of such taxpayer’s
immediate family), and that taxpayer
had sole
authority to execute the
return, make the deposit, or pay the
tax (person responsible).
PRC 26indicates
the incident occurred to the
person
responsible for filing,
paying or depositing.
- If
someone, other than the taxpayer or the
person responsible, is authorized to
meet the obligation, consider the
reasons why that person did not meet the
obligation when evaluating the request
for relief. In the case of a business,
if only one person was authorized,
determine whether this was in keeping
with ordinary business care and
prudence.
-
Information to consider when evaluating
a request for penalty relief based on
reasonable cause due to death, serious
illness, or unavoidable absence
includes, but is not limited to, the
following:
- The
relationship of the taxpayer to the
other parties involved.
- The
date of death.
- The
dates, duration, and severity of
illness.
- The
dates and reasons for absence.
- How
the event prevented compliance.
- If
other business obligations were
impaired, and
- If
tax duties were attended to promptly
when the illness passed, or within a
reasonable period of time after a
death or absence.
20.1.1.3.1.2.5 (08-20-1998)
Unable to Obtain Records
-
Explanations relating to the inability
to obtain the necessary records may
constitute reasonable cause in some
instances, but may not in others.
- Consider
the facts and circumstances relevant to
each case and evaluate the request for
penalty relief.
- If the
taxpayer was unable to obtain records
necessary to comply with a tax
obligation, the taxpayer may or may not
be able to establish reasonable cause.
Reasonable cause may be established if
the taxpayer
exercised ordinary business care and
prudence, but due to circumstances
beyond the taxpayer’s control they were
unable to comply.
-
Information to consider when evaluating
such a request includes, but is not
limited to an explanation as to:
- Why
the records were needed to comply.
- Why
the records were unavailable and
what steps were taken to secure the
records.
- When
and how the taxpayer became aware
that they did not have the necessary
records.
- If
other means were explored to secure
needed information.
- Why
the taxpayer did not estimate the
information.
- If
the taxpayer contacted the Service
for instructions on what to do about
missing information.
- If
the taxpayer promptly complied once
the missing information was
received; and
-
Supporting documentation such as
copies of letters written and
responses received in an effort to
get the needed information.
- Use PRC
25 if the taxpayer establishes
reasonable cause because of an inability
to obtain the records necessary to
comply with a tax or information filing
requirement.
20.1.1.3.2
(08-20-1998)
Statutory Exceptions & Administrative
Waivers
- These two
very separate categories are placed together
because in many instances an Administrative
Waiver is an extension of rules that were
provided for by statute.
20.1.1.3.2.1 (08-20-1998)
Statutory Exceptions
- Tax
legislation (Internal Revenue Code (IRC))
may provide an exception to a penalty.
Specific statutory exceptions can be found
in either the penalty-related IRC section
or the accompanying regulations. For
example:
- IRC
section 6654(e)(1), (2), or (3),
Estimated Tax Penalties for
Individuals (IRM 20.1.3).
- IRC
section 7502(a) and 7502(e), Timely
Mailing Treated as Timely Filing and
Paying (IRM 20.1.2).
- IRC
section 6724(a) or 6724(c), Waiver;
Definitions and Special Rules,
Information Return Penalties (IRM
20.1.7).
- IRC
section 6404(f), Abatement of Penalty
or Addition to Tax Attributable to
Written Advice of the Internal Revenue
Service (see IRM 20.1.1).
- IRC
section 7508, Time for performing
certain Acts Postponed by Reason of
Service in Combat Zone. This provision
applies only in a
Presidentially-declared "Combat Zone."
-
Legislation with retroactive provisions
may provide guidance on associated
penalties. As a result of that retroactive
provision, the Service may issue a News
Release or other guidance with
instructions for the disposition of the
related penalties.
- Some
Statutory Exceptions are assigned their
own Penalty Reason Code (see the specific
topic). However, many are not. Statutory
Exceptions in general are identified by
the use of PRC 44.
20.1.1.3.2.2 (08-20-1998)
Administrative Waiver
- The
Service may formally interpret or clarify
a provision to provide administrative
relief from a penalty that would otherwise
be assessed. An administrative waiver may
be addressed in either a Policy Statement,
News Release, or other formal
communication stating that the policy of
the Service is to provide relief from a
penalty under specific conditions.
- An
administrative waiver may be necessary
when there is a delay by the Service in:
-
Printing or mailing of forms
-
Publishing guidance, writing of
regulations, or
- Other
conditions.
- An example
of an administrative waiver is Notice
93–22, 1993-1 C.B. 305. This allowed
individuals
who requested an automatic 4-month
extension of time to file an income tax
return, an extension of time without
remitting the unpaid amount of any tax
properly estimated to be due.
- An
administrative waiver is identified by PRC
43.
20.1.1.3.2.3 (08-20-1998)
Undue Hardship
- An undue
hardship may support the granting of an
extension of time for paying a tax or
deficiency. Treas. Reg. 1.6161–1(b),
provides that an undue hardship must be
more than an inconvenience to the
taxpayer. The taxpayer must show that they
would sustain a substantial financial loss
if forced to paya
tax or deficiency on the due date.
- The
extension of time to pay does not provide
the taxpayer with an extension of time to
file. Nor does the extension of time to
pay relieve the taxpayer of any
appropriate penalties.
- Undue
hardship generally
does not
affect a person’s ability to
file and therefore would not provide a
basis for penalty relief in a failure to
file situation. However, each request must
be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Undue hardship may establish reasonable
cause for failure to file on magnetic
media, under Treas. Reg. 301.6724–1.
- Undue
hardship may
also support relief from the addition to
tax for failure to pay tax if, the
explanation for the noncompliance supports
such a determination. However, the mere
inability to pay
does not ordinarily provide
the basis for granting penalty relief.
Under Treas. Reg. 301.6651–1(e), the
taxpayer must also show that they
exercised ordinary business care and
prudence in providing for the payment of
the tax liability.
- The
taxpayer may claim that enough funds
were on hand but, as a result of
unanticipated events, the taxpayer was
unable to pay the taxes.
-
Consider an individual taxpayer’s
inability to pay a factor when
considering penalty relief if the
taxpayer shows that, had the payment
been made on the payment due date,
undue hardship (as defined in Treas.
Reg. 1.6161–1(b)) would have resulted.
In the case where a taxpayer files
bankruptcy, consider inability to pay
a factor if the insolvency occurred
before the tax payment date.
- If a
payroll was met, taxes were withheld and
should be available for deposit. Employers
must reserve money withheld from
employees’ wages in trust until deposited.
The employer should not use the money for
any other purpose. Undue hardship does not
support relief from the IRC section 6672,
Failure to Collect and Pay Over Tax, or
attempt to Evade or Defeat Tax (Trust Fund
Recovery Program).
-
Information to consider when evaluating a
request for penalty relief includes, but
is not limited to, the following:
- When
did the taxpayer know they could not
pay?
- Why
was the taxpayer unable to pay?
- Did
the taxpayer explore other means to
secure the necessary funds?
- What
did the taxpayer supply in the way of
supporting documentation, such as
copies of bank statements?
- Did
the taxpayer pay when the funds became
available?
- An
abatement of a penalty because the
taxpayer experienced a "undue hardship" is
identified by the use of PRC 29.
20.1.1.3.2.4 (08-20-1998)
Advice
- This
section discusses three basic types of
advice: written and/or oral advice
provided by the Service, and advice
provided by a tax
professional.
-
Information to consider when evaluating a
request for abatement or nonassertion of a
penalty due to reliance or advice,
includes, but is not limited to, the
following:
- Was
the advice in response to a specific
request and was the advice received
related to the facts contained in that
request?
- Did
the taxpayer reasonably rely on the
advice?
- The
following examples address situations
where a taxpayer relies on written advice
from the Service regarding an item on a
filed return.
- The
taxpayer did not reasonably rely on
the advice regarding an item
included on a
returnif the advise was
received after the date the return was
filed;
- A
taxpayer may be considered to have
reasonably relied on advice received
after the return was filed if they
then filed an amended return that
conformed with such written advice;
- A
taxpayer may not be considered to have
reasonably relied on written advice
unrelatedto
an item included on a return, such as
advice on the payment of estimated
taxes, if the advice is received after
the estimated tax payment was due.
- Did the
taxpayer provide the Service or the tax
professional with adequate and accurate
information?
- The
taxpayer is entitled to penalty relief for
the period during which they relied on the
advice. The period continues until the
taxpayer is placed
on noticethat the advice is no
longer correct or no longer represents the
Service’s position.
- The
taxpayer is placed
on noticeas the result of any
of the following events that present a
contrary position and occur after the
issuance of the written advice:
-
Written correspondence from the
Service that its advice is no longer
correct or no longer represents the
Service’s position;
-
Enactment of legislation or
ratification of a tax treaty;
- A U.S.
Supreme Court decision;
- The
issuance of temporary or final
regulations; or
- the
publication of a revenue ruling,
revenue procedure, or other statement
in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
- Taxpayers
should submit the necessary supporting
information and documentation with Form
843, Claim. However, if the information
provided demonstrates that abatement of
the penalty is warranted, the penalty
should be abated, whether or not a Form
843 is provided.
20.1.1.3.2.4.1 (08-20-1998)
Written Advice from the Service
- The
Service is required by IRC section
6404(f) and Treas. Reg. 301.6404–3 to
abate any portion of any penalty
attributable to erroneous written advice
furnished by an officer or employee of
the Service acting in their official
capacity.
- If the
taxpayer does not meet the criteria for
penalty relief under IRC section 6404,
the taxpayer may qualify for other
penalty relief. For instance, taxpayers
who fail to meet all of the above
criteria may still qualify for relief
under reasonable cause if the Service
determines that the taxpayer exercised
ordinary business care and prudence in
relying on the Service’s written advice.
-
Penalties abated as a result of reliance
on erroneously written advice from the
Service should be identified by PRC 44,
Statutory Exception.
20.1.1.3.2.4.2 (08-20-1998)
Oral Advice from the Service
- The
Service may provide penalty relief based
on a taxpayer’s reliance on erroneous
oral advice from the Service. The
Service is required by IRC section
6404(f) and Treas. Reg. 301.6404–3 to
abate any portion of any penalty
attributable to erroneously
written
advice furnished by an employee acting
in their official capacity.
Administratively, the Service has
extended this relief to include
erroneous oral advice when
appropriate.
- In
addition to considering the criteria
provided in above, consider the
following:
- Did
the taxpayer exercise ordinary
business care and prudence in
relying on that advice?
- Was
there a clear relationship between
the taxpayer’s situation, the advice
provided, and the penalty assessed?
- What
is the taxpayer’s prior tax history
and prior experience with the tax
requirements?
- Did
the Service provide correct
information by other means (such as
tax forms and publications)?
- What
type of supporting documentation is
available?
- The
following are types of supporting
documentation:
- A
notation of the taxpayer’s question
to the Service;
-
Documentation regarding the advice
provided by the Service;
-
Information regarding the office and
method by which the advice was
obtained;
- The
date the advice was provided, and
- The
name of the employee who provided
the information.
-
Penalties abated as the result of
reliance on erroneous oral advice
provided by the Service should be
identified by using PRC 31 in the fourth
reason code position.
20.1.1.3.2.4.3 (08-20-1998)
Advice from a Tax Advisor
- Reliance
on the advice of a tax advisor generally
relates to the reasonable cause
exception in IRC section 6664© for the
accuracy-related penalty under IRC
section 6662. See IRM 20.1.5, Preparer
Promoter Penalty, and Treas. Reg.
1.6664–4(c).
- However,
in very limited instances, reliance on
the advice of a tax advisor may apply to
other penalties when the tax advisor
provides advice on a substantive tax
issue.
-
Example:The
employer researched all available
Service publications on the subject of
contract labor, provided clear and
convincing documentation as to the
duties of the workers to the tax
advisor, and requested an opinion from
the tax advisor as to whether the
workers were "contract labor" or
employees. As a result, the tax advisor
advised the employer that the workers
were "contract labor" . However, the
Service later determined that the
workers were "employees" and not
"contract labor" .
- Reliance
on the advice of a tax advisor is
limited to issues generally considered
technical or complicated. The taxpayer’s
responsibility to file, pay or deposit
taxes cannot be excused by reliance on
the advice of a tax advisor.
20.1.1.3.2.5 (08-20-1998)
Fire, Casualty, Natural Disaster, or
Other Disturbance
- Relief
from a penalty may be requested if there
was a failure to timely comply with a
requirement to file a return or pay a tax
as the result of a fire, casualty, natural
disaster, or other disturbance.
- Relief
from a penalty because the taxpayer
suffered from a fire, casualty, natural
disaster, or other disturbance should be
identified by the use of the appropriate
PRC. It could be that as a result of the
fire the taxpayer was unable to access
their records (PRC 25) or as the result of
an accident, the responsible party was
hospitalized and unable to file the return
or pay the tax (PRC 24 or 26).
- Fire,
casualty, natural disaster, or other
disturbance are factors to consider. One
of these circumstances by itself does not
necessarily provide penalty relief.
- Penalty
relief may be appropriate if the taxpayer
exercised ordinary business care and
prudence, but due to circumstances beyond
the taxpayer’s control they were unable to
comply with the law.
- Factors to
consider include:
-
Timing.
- Effect
on the taxpayer’s business.
- Steps
taken to attempt to comply.
- If the
taxpayer complied when it became
possible.
- The
determination to grant relief from each
penalty must be based on the facts and
circumstances surrounding each individual
case.
20.1.1.3.2.6 (08-20-1998)
Official Disaster Area
- When a
significant disaster occurs affecting a
wide area of taxpayers, the Service often
issues special instructions to facilitate
evaluating the request for penalty relief.
-
Because there are one-time
instructions, they will not be
incorporated in this IRM. Territories,
service centers, and customer service
sites will be kept informed of any
special instructions affecting their
areas.
-
Penalty Relief granted because the
taxpayer was located in an
Official
Disaster Area is identified
by the use of PRC 28.
20.1.1.3.3
(08-20-1998)
Service Error
- A Service
error can be any error made by the Service
in computing or assessing tax, crediting
accounts, etc. See Exhibit 20.1.1–3, Penalty
Reason Code Chart, for the appropriate PRC
to be used when abating either a
computer-generated or manually-input
penalty.
- General
Service Error (computer generated—PRC 15).
This PRC should be used to identify
penalties abated as the result of a Master
File Recovery.
- When an
analyst, from any area of the Service,
identifies a computer
programming applicationthat
caused a penalty to be assessed in error,
that analyst should:
- Contact
Information Services (IS) to resolve the
inadequate
computer application, and
- Include
on the Request for Information Services
(RIS) a statement indicating that PRC 15
must be used to identify any abatement
of a penalty resulting from reversal of
the computer
application.
- Other
Service Error (manual input—PRC 45). This
PRC should be used to identify penalties
abated as the result of service errors that
occur individually. Some examples are:
- A math
error when manually computing a penalty,
- An
extension of time to file that did not
post to the Master File, or
- Any
other error, when it can be shown that
(a) the taxpayer did in fact comply with
the law, and (b) the Service did not
initially recognize that fact.
20.1.1.3.4
(08-20-1998)
Requesting Penalty Relief
- The initial
request for relief may occur either after an
examination, but before a penalty is
actually assessed, or with a return that is
either filed or paid late.
- When the
request is received carefully analyze the
taxpayer’s reasons to determine if penalty
relief if warranted. The burden of proof is
generally upon the taxpayer.
- Each request
must be evaluated on its own merit
including:
- The
events or parties involved, and
- If the
taxpayer exercised ordinary business
care and prudence, but due to
circumstances or events beyond the
taxpayer’s control the taxpayer was
unable to meet the tax requirement or if
other penalty relief criteria apply.
- The
taxpayer’s obligation to meet the
requirement is ongoing. Ordinary business
care and prudence requires that the taxpayer
continue to attempt to meet the
requirements, even though late.
- Determine if
the taxpayer’s explanation addresses the
penalty imposed.
- The
dates and explanations should clearly
correspond with events on which the
penalties are based to show that the
taxpayer is entitled to relief from the
penalty.
- Request
additional information from the taxpayer
to clarify the explanation if the dates
and explanations do not correspond with
the events on which the penalty are
based.
- Review
available Service information (see IRM
1.3.1.2) in determining whether or not the
taxpayer exercised ordinary business care
and prudence. Check the
preceding tax years (at least two)for
payment patterns and the taxpayer’s overall
compliance history.
- The same
penalty, previously assessed, may
indicate that the taxpayer is not
exercising ordinary business care.
- If this
is the taxpayer’s first incident of
noncompliant behavior, weigh this factor
with other reasons the taxpayer gives
for relief, since a first time failure
to comply does not by itself establish
reasonable cause.
- Consider the
length of time between the event cited as a
reason for the noncompliance and subsequent
compliance. The length of time between
events may serve to cancel or reduce the
event’s effect. Penalty relief may not be
appropriate if after considering all facts
and circumstances the taxpayer fails to
timely correct noncompliant behavior.
- The
following are examples where penalty relief
may not be appropriate.
- The
taxpayers claim that they were unable to
comply with the filing requirement due
to a death in the family. The death
occurred several months prior to the due
date of the return. The return was not
filed until a year after the due date of
the return.
-
Taxpayers claim that they were unable to
comply with the filing requirement
because the records necessary for filing
were in the control of a third party,
i.e., a bankruptcy trustee or an
accountant. The records were returned to
the taxpayer well in advance of time the
return was required to be filed. The
return was not filed until several
months after the records were returned.
- In both
of the examples, the timing of the event
may prevent the taxpayer from receiving
penalty relief unless other factors
justify the delay in filing.
- Consider if
the taxpayer could have anticipated the
event that caused the non-compliance. See
IRM 20.1.1.3.1.2.
20.1.1.3.4.1 (08-20-1998)
Subsequent Requests for Penalty Relief
- A second
or subsequent request for penalty relief
may be received after the initial request
for relief has been denied.
- If the
review of the account indicates that the
taxpayer’s request for penalty relief was
previously disallowed, review the
circumstances of the previous denial.
- Is the
taxpayer submitting new information?
If yes, consider the facts and
circumstances discussed in the new
information. Abate the penalty,
disallow the request, or send a letter
informing the taxpayer that you are
unable to consider (not consider) the
request for penalty relief based on
the new information provided and the
information contained in the original
disallowance.
- If the
taxpayer is not submitting new
information then is the taxpayer
requesting an appeal of the previous
determination? If yes, forward the
request to Appeals. If no, send the
taxpayer a letter stating that you are
unable to consider (not consider) the
case on the grounds of the previous
determination.
- If it
is unclear what the taxpayer wants,
contact the taxpayer to request
clarifying information.
- If the
penalty was previously sustained in
Appeals, forward the request to the
appropriate Appeals office. (This may be
identified by the presence of a TC 290 for
$0.00 with a blocking series 96X on the
account.)
20.1.1.3.4.2 (08-20-1998)
Taxpayer Entitled to Relief
- If the
taxpayer provides an explanation that
supports their request, waive or abate the
applicable penalties. If the explanation
applies to only a portion of the penalty,
only that portion of the penalty should be
waived or abated.
- Document
the decision and the basis for providing
relief according to functional guidelines.
Attach a copy of the information to the
original return (if available) or other
transaction (input) document.
- Decisions
made by compliance personnel, with respect
to penalties, should not ordinarily be
changed by personnel within another
functional area. Before considering relief
for a penalty asserted by compliance
personnel, contact that office to
determine if the case should be returned
to the originating office.
- If relief
is granted prior to assertion of the
penalty, use computer condition codes to
suppress the automatic assertion of
penalties. Functional areas that forward
returns to be processed must request that
the service center prevent the assessment
of the penalty. This may be done by:
-
Writing "Reasonable Cause" or "Penalty
Relief" (as appropriate) in the
preprinted penalty block on the return
or on Form 4364, Delinquency
Computations;
-
Requesting the penalty assessment
transaction code be input for zero
amount;
-
Editing a computer condition code on
the return; or
-
Preparing other forms appropriate for
forwarding returns or penalty
computations for processing.
- In
addition, annotate the appropriate PRC
on the respective form or return.
- If relief
is granted after the assessment of a
penalty, follow procedures for abating the
penalty or the appropriate portion of the
penalty. Adjustments to penalties that are
due to reasonable cause should include
Reason Code 62 and the appropriate PRC.
See Exhibit 20.1.1–3.
- If relief
if warranted for only a portion of the
penalty, manually compute and assess or
abate the applicable penalty amount. This
will prevent automatic assertion of the
penalty for the full amount. Follow
applicable penalty procedures in IRM 20.1.
20.1.1.3.4.3 (08-20-1998)
Taxpayer Not Entitled to Relief
- If the
criteria for penalty relief has not been
met, determine if additional information
would be helpful to evaluate the
taxpayer’s request (see IRM 20.1.1.3.1).
- If a final
determination that the criteria for
granting penalty relief was not
established:
-
Document the decision and its basis
according to functional guidelines,
and
- Attach
a copy of the information to the
original return (if available) or
other transaction (input) document.
- Employees
denying a request for preassessment relief
(prior to assessment) or abatement (after
assessment), must provide written
notification to the taxpayer of the denial
and of the taxpayer’s appeal rights,
regardless of whether the request was
received,
- In
person,
- Over
the phone, or
- In
writing.
- The notice
should include:
- A
complete explanation of the Service’s
decision and the basis for denial;
-
Information on the appeal procedures,
including instructions on how to
submit a written protest; and
- Power
of attorney information.
- The
Service has developed standardized letters
that are used by various offices. They
include:
- IDRS
Correspondex Letter 854(C), which is
generally used by service centers and
area offices.
- ACS
LT38, which is used by the Automated
Collection System.
-
Pattern letters 2413(P) and 2414(P),
which are used by Collection Area
Offices.
- Functions
that process returns through the service
center will need to alert the service
center of their decision to deny penalty
relief. This can be done by writing
"Penalty Relief Denied" in the appropriate
preprinted penalty block on the return or
on Form 4364, Delinquency
Computations.
- If a
request for penalty relief if denied after
assessment, request or input TC 290 for
zero amount, using blocking series 98/99
(Appeals uses blocking series 96X) with
Reason Code 62 and Hold Code 3.
20.1.1.4
(08-20-1998)
Methods of Appealing Penalties
- Various
administrative and legislative remedies are
provided for taxpayers who disagree with the
Service’s determination that they are liable
for a particular penalty. Generally, when a
taxpayer disagrees with our determination
regarding a penalty they have the right to an
administrative appeal.
- Taxpayers have
the right to challenge the assertion or
assessment of a penalty, and generally may do
so at any stage in the penalty process.
Taxpayers may request:
- A review
of the penalty prior to assessment (e.g.
deficiency
procedures),
- A penalty
abatement after it is assessed and either
before or after it is paid (postassessment
review),
- An
abatement and refund after payment (claim
for refund).
- Taxpayers may
indicate their disagreement with the Service
verbally, in writing, or if paid, by filing a
claim for refund or credit.
- If agreement
cannot be reached at the area or service
center, the taxpayer may request a conference
with the employee’s immediate manager or in
most cases the taxpayer may request that the
case be forwarded to Appeals. Taxpayers should
provide a written request for consideration by
Appeals.
- The taxpayer
may also file suit in court. Depending on the
procedural circumstances of the taxpayer’s
case, the taxpayer may petition the United
States Tax Court or file a complaint with
either the United States District Court having
jurisdiction or the United States Court of
Federal Claims, as appropriate. See Appeals
Processing & Control Handbook.
20.1.1.4.1
(08-20-1998)
The Appeals Function
- The Appeals
Office is an independent administrative body
within the Service that is the only formal
level of appeal within the Service.
- The review
of a penalty determination by Appeals is not
automatic. Appeals will only review a
penalty if the request for relief has been
previously denied by a Service employee and
the taxpayer requests an appeal.
- In addition,
Appeals may make a determination that the
taxpayer did not commit the prohibited
action or failure to act for which the
penalty is asserted (charged). Issues of
basic liability for a penalty may be
consid-ered in the appeals process, and
should be considered before considering if
reasonable cause or other relief criteria
exist.
- Appeals has
the authority to settle penalties for less
than the full amount based on the hazards of
litigation.
20.1.1.4.1.1 (08-20-1998)
Preassessment Appeals
- Generally,
Appeals will consider the following type
of penalties prior to assessment:
-
Penalties which are asserted by the
Service in the course of an
examination of a taxpayer’s income tax
return;
-
Penalties which are granted a specific
preassessment appeal right such as the
Trust Fund Recovery penalty under IRC
6672 (see Employment Tax Handbook for
Trust Fund Recovery penalty
guidelines) or the preparer penalties
under IRC 6694, and
- The
intentional disregard penalty of IRC
section 6721(e) when it is asserted
for failures to comply with the cash
reporting requirements of IRC section
6050I.
- Generally,
if Appeals considers a penalty before it
is assessed, Appeals will not reconsider
the penalty after it is assessed.
-
However, at its discretion, Appeals
may reconsider its prior decision if
evidence becomes available that
indicates further consideration is
warranted.
-
Taxpayers may also pay the penalty
previously upheld by Appeals, and file
a claim for refund. The claim for
refund may be brought to Appeals if
denied.
- More
detailed Appeals procedures are described
in the Appeals Returns Processing and
Control Handbook.
20.1.1.4.1.2 (08-20-1998)
Postassessment Appeals
- To request
abatement of a penalty after assessment,
the taxpayer must submit a written request
to the Service.
- The
employee must consider all the facts and
circumstances to determine if the
taxpayer’s explanation meets the penalty
relief criteria. See IRM 20.1.1.3.
- If a
taxpayer orally request the abatement of a
penalty, advise the taxpayer to submit the
request in writing.
- If a
taxpayer orally requests an appeal of a
decision, advise the taxpayer to submit
the request in writing.
- Certain
penalties such as failure to file, failure
to pay, and failure to deposit are
routinely assessed at the time a return is
filed or the tax is paid. When one of
these penalties is assessed, the taxpayer
may submit a statement requesting an
abatement of the penalty.
20.1.1.4.2
(08-20-1998)
Deficiency Procedures
- IRC section
6211 generally defines a deficiency as the
excess of the correct amount of income,
estate or gift taxes owed less the sum of
the amount shown on the return and the
amounts previously assessed (or collected
without assessment) less rebates. In
general, deficiency procedures are used when
additional income, estate, or gift taxes
and/or related penalties are proposed. The
Service generally:
-
Cannot
assess an additional amount of income,
estate, or gift tax, including related
penalties unless it complies with
deficiency
procedures;
-
Can
assess additional amounts of employment
and certain excise tax and related
penalties without providing a notice of
deficiency;
-
Can
assess penalties not related to a tax
(e.g., IRC sections 6700, 6701, 6702)
without providing a notice of
deficiency;
-
Can
assess estimated tax penalties (IRC
sections 6654 and 6655) if a return was
filed for the tax year without providing
a notice of deficiency; and
-
Can
assess the failure to file and failure
to pay (IRC section 6651) applicable to
the portion of the tax liability which
is not a tax deficiency without
providing a notice of deficiency.
-
Example:Taxpayer
files the return one month late and
reports and pays a tax of $4,000. On
audit, the Service determines a tax
deficiency of $1,000. The late filing
penalty is 5 percent, per month, (for up
to 5 months) of the amount of tax. The
total
failure to file penalty is $250 (5
percent of $5,000 for one month). If the
taxpayer contests the deficiency, the
taxpayer will be entitled to a notice of
deficiency for $1,050 ($1,000 tax
deficiency and $50 failure to file
penalty (5 percent of $1,000). The
remaining $200 failure to file penalty
which was attributable to the original
tax assessment is not part of the
deficiency and is collectible by
immediate assessment.
- A penalty is
subject to deficiency procedures, if the
related tax underpayment being assessed is
subject to deficiency procedures. For
example, if the negligence penalty was
assessed on an underpayment of income tax,
the deficiency procedures would apply to the
negligence penalty as well as income tax
deficiency. However, if the penalty was the
result of an underpayment of employment tax,
deficiency procedures would not apply to the
penalty.
- The
taxes and related penalties subject to
deficiency procedures include income,
estate and gift tax, as well as certain
excise taxes.
- The
taxes and related penalties not subject
to deficiency procedures include
employment taxes imposed by Subtitle C,
and certain excise taxes.
- The
procedure called "notice of deficiency"
provides the taxpayer a method of appealing
tax and/or penalties prior to their
assessment.
20.1.1.4.2.1 (08-20-1998)
Non-Deficiency Procedures
- Most
employment and excise taxes are not
subject to deficiency procedures. No
statutory notice of deficiency is issued
and the taxpayer cannot petition the Tax
Court.
- Generally,
nondeficiency procedures are as follows:
- If
penalties are proposed and the
taxpayer agrees, the penalties are
assessed.
- If
penalties are proposed and the
taxpayer disagrees a 30 day letter is
issued andthe
taxpayer may file a protest with
Appeals.
- If
Appeals sustains the penalty proposal,
the penalties are assessed.
- If
penalties are assessed and the taxpayer
cannot or does not file a protest with
Appeals, the taxpayer must pay the
penalty, then they may file a claim for
credit or refund.
- If a 30
day letter was not issued, or if a claim
for refund was denied, the taxpayer should
be given the opportunity for an appeal.
20.1.1.5
(08-20-1998)
Master File Indicators
- Master file
indicators are listed below.
20.1.1.5.1
(08-20-1998)
Master File Reason Codes
- Penalty
reason codes were adopted to enable the
Service to track penalties. Accurate
reporting of these reason codes is vital.
Penalty reason codes provide the basis for
determining a taxpayer’s compliance history
and the foundation of the Penalty Management
Information System. Penalty reason codes are
used with both BMF and IMF document code 54
and 47 transactions.
- Penalty
reason codes are divided into two
categories, systemically generated and
manually input. When manually abating a
penalty, use only those reason codes
identified as available for manual input on
Exhibit 20.1.1–3.
- If an
abatement or partial abatement of a penalty
is appropriate, either input the abatement
transaction or complete the appropriate form
to request that the support area abate the
penalty using the specified penalty reason
code.
-
Taxpayer Service—IDRS
(ADJ54)—The Penalty Reason Code MUST be
used only in
the fourth reason code position.
-
Compliance—The
penalty reason code must be used to
identify the reason for the abatement or
nonassertion of a penalty when
completing any of the following forms:
Form 5344,
Examination Closing Record (ADJ47);
Form 5599,
EO Examined Closing Record (ADJ47); and
Form 8278,
Computation and Assessment of
Miscellaneous Penalties (ADJ54).
-
Appeals—The
penalty reason code must be used when
abatement or non-assertion of a penalty
when completing any of the following
forms: Form 5403,
Appeals Closing Record (ADJ47),
Form 9120,
Appeals Transmittal Memorandum and
Supporting Statement—Penalty (ADJ54),
and Form 8278,
Computation and Assessment of
Miscellaneous Penalties (ADJ54).
- There are
four main categories of Penalty Reason Codes
available for manual input.
-
Penalty Relief,
to be used in conjunction with IRM
20.1.1.3 or other specific penalty
provisions provided throughout IRM 20.1
(see Exhibit 20.1.1–3).
-
Appeals,
the following three reason codes are to
be used only by Appeals and only when
the other criteria referenced in Exhibit
20.1.1–3 are inappropriate. For example:
RC 40—hazards
of litigation or other Appeals
Settlement when all of the penalty is
abated; RC 41—penalties
are sustained by Appeals;
RC 42—partial
abatement (Settlements where part of the
penalty is abated).
-
Statutory
Exception or Administrative Waivers(to
be used when written procedures have
been established).
-
Service Error(to
be used when it is determined that the
Service computed the penalty incorrectly
or inappropriately).
- If more than
one penalty is abated for more than one
reason, each abatement action must reference
its own penalty reason code. This will
require a separate adjustment for each
penalty reason code. For example:
-
16X Reasonable Cause—PRC 25
-
27X Partially abated—PRC 42
-
18X Hazards—PRC 40
- If all
penalties are abated for the same reason,
only one PRC must be referenced. For
example:
-
16X Reasonable Cause—PRC 25
-
27X Reasonable Cause
-
18X Reasonable Cause
20.1.1.5.2
(08-20-1998)
Penalty Transaction Codes
- Penalty
transaction codes (see Exhibit 20.1.1–4)
indicate assessment or abatement actions.
Generally, return related penalties are
based on an underpayment of tax.
- When the
penalty is assessed on the Tax Module,
generally, each penalty is assigned a
Transaction Code (TC) which identifies
the type of penalty, however, some
penalties assessed on a Tax Module will
use a TC 240 with a reference number
(RN) which identifies the type of
penalty. These reference numbers are
between 680 and 699.
- There
are usually four potential transaction
codes for each penalty, one each for
manual and computer assessments with the
related abatement codes. For example,
Failure to File (FTF):
(1) 160— Manually
assessed FTF (2) 161—
Manually abatedFTF
(3) 166— Computer
generated assessment of the
FTF (4) 167—
Computer generated abatement
of the FTF.
- Related
penalty Transaction Codes in a series
are shown in Exhibit 20.1.1–4, with the
first two digits plus an X. For example,
in the FTF example series above the TC
will be shown as 16X.
- Exhibit
20.1.1–4 provides (a) Penalty Transaction
Codes (TC) (b) their related IRC section,
and (c) a description of the penalty.
20.1.1.5.3
(08-20-1998)
Penalty Reference Numbers
- Penalty
Reference Numbers are used to identify
penalties that are not
based on information from a tax
return. These penalties are based on a
failure to perform an act required by the
Internal Revenue Code (IRC). The penalty is
assessed on MFT 13 (Individual) or 55
(Business), and identified by a Reference
Number.
- At times
several reference numbers will be used to
identify one Code section, though the
failure may be the same or similar. This is
done to identify the area or program
responsible for assessing or abating the
penalty. For example, both reference numbers
500 and 600 are used to identify a penalty
assessed as the result of IRC section 6721.
-
Reference number 500 is used if the
failure was identified on the Payer
Master File.
-
Reference number 600 is used if the
failure was identified during an
examination, audit, or other compliance
determination based on the taxpayer’s
books and records.
-
Reference numbers between 680 and 699
are used to identify return related
penalties. These reference numbers will
appear on tax related MFT’s (not MFT 13
or 55).
- See Exhibits
20.1.1–5 and 20.1.1–6 for Penalty Reference
Numbers, their related IRC section, a
description of the penalty, or the computer
paragraph inserted in the balance due
notice.
- The
following are examples of reference numbers
assigned for various failures relating to
IRC section 6721.
-
Reference numbers 500 through 514 are
used to assess/abate penalties based on
Payer Master File information. See IRM
20.1.7, Information Return Penalties.
-
Reference number 549 is used to
assess/abate penalties based on the CAWR
Program. See IRM 20.1.7, Information
Return
Penalties.
- The 600
series reference numbers are used to
assess or abate a penalty as the result
of an examination or a determination
made by a compliance employee: (a)
600—failure to timely and correctly file
an information return; (b) 609—failure
to timely and correctly file a Form
8300—responses to Detroit Computing
Center; (c) 651—Failure to File—Form
8300; (d) 652—Intentional Disregard—Form
8300.
20.1.1.6
(08-20-1998)
Administrative Procedures
- See Exhibit
20.1.1–7 for the Table of Abbreviations and
Acronyms and Exhibit 20.1.1–8 for the
Dictionary of Key Terms.
20.1.1.6.1
(08-20-1998)
Corporate Files on Line (CFOL)
- CFOL
provides on-line research of master file
account and return data. The use of command
codes such as IMFOL, BMFOL, and RTVUE is an
alternative to MFTRA/ACTRA/ESTAB requests.
- However,
since master file does not carry all
information available on the IDRS screen
displays (IDRS notice status, case control
information, pending transaction, etc.), it
is imperative that IDRS research be
initiated before accessing master file
information via CFOL command codes. Also
IDRS input command codes that will cause a
change to master file data cannot be
preceded by BRTVUE or RTVUE.
- CFOL command
codes should be used to research entity
and/or tax data which may not be available
on IDRS. In most cases, the response will
appear on the screen in five seconds or
less.
- It is
recommended that CFOL command codes be
used in lieu of MFTRA/ACTRA/ESTAB when
the case can be resolved from
information provided by the CFOL command
codes.
- This
will reduce the need to order MFTRA
transcripts on some cases.
- IMFOL
accesses the IMF and allows several screen
displays based on an input definer code.
These include:
- An index
screen which shows whether a specific
tax period is available on-line or not.
The index screen also includes a balance
due field showing if the account is in
debit, credit, or zero balance.
- A screen
which shows entity type information
(similar to INOLE).
- A screen
which has specific data from the tax
account (similar to TXMOD and MFTRA).
- A screen
titled IMF Adjustment Transaction Screen
which includes detailed information
about adjustment transactions input.
- A screen
which includes retention register
account information.
- A posted
TC 150 return screen which displays
return data that is transcribed along
with computer generated fields.
- A status
history screen which includes extension
to file data.
- A help
screen which displays information to
assist in using IMFOL/BMFOL.
- RTVUE
accesses the Return Transaction File (RTF).
It contains all edited, transcribed, and
error corrected data from data entry lines
of returns and related forms and schedules
filed in the current processing year
(including returns for prior tax years). At
a later date, this file will contain
information for the current year and two
prior year returns. This command code
requires a definer to access a particular
screen and has an index type screen.
- For further
explanation of the screen displays and
applicable definer codes, refer to the Aims
Handbook for IDRS Terminals Inquiries.
Exhibit 20.1.1.6-1 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Policy Statement (P–1–18)
|
PENALTY
POLICY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
Penalties
constitute one important tool of the
Internal Revenue Service in pursuing its
mission of collecting the proper amount
of tax revenue at the least cost.
Penalties support the Service’s mission
only
if penalties enhance voluntary
compliance. Even though other results,
such as raising of revenue, punishment,
or reimbursement of the costs of
enforcement, may also arise when
penalties are asserted, the Service will
design, administer, and evaluate penalty
programs solely on the basis of whether
they do the best possible job of
encouraging compliant conduct.
|
|
|
|
|
In the
interest of an effective tax system, the
Service uses penalties to encourage
voluntary compliance by: (1) helping
taxpayers understand that compliant
conduct is appropriate and that
non-compliant conduct is not; (2)
deterring noncompliance by imposing
costs on it; and (3) establishing the
fairness of the tax system by justly
penalizing the non-compliant taxpayer.
|
|
|
|
|
To this end,
the IRS administers a penalty system
that is designed to: |
|
|
|
|
— |
ensure
consistency; |
|
|
|
|
— |
ensure
accuracy of results in light of the
facts and the law; |
|
|
|
|
— |
provide
methods for the taxpayer to have his or
her interests heard and considered; |
|
|
|
|
— |
require
impartiality and a commitment to achieve
the correct decision; |
|
|
|
|
— |
allow for
prompt reversal of initial
determinations when sufficient
information has been presented to
indicate that the penalty is not
appropriate; |
|
|
|
|
— |
ensure that
penalties are used for their proper
purpose and not as bargaining points in
the development or processing of cases. |
|
|
|
|
The Service
maintains an ongoing effort to develop,
monitor, and revise programs designed to
assist taxpayers in complying with legal
requirements and, thus, avoid penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
To ensure
consistency, the Service prescribes and
uses a single set of guidelines in a
Penalty Handbook which will be followed
by all operational and processing
functions. Prior to implementation,
changes to the Penalty Handbook must be
reviewed for consistency with Service
Policy and approved by the Penalties and
Interest Office. |
|
|
|
|
The Service
collects statistical and demographic
information to evaluate penalties and
penalty administration and how they
relate to the goal of voluntary
compliance. The Service continually
evaluates the impact of the penalty
program on compliance and recommends
changes when the statutes or
administration of penalties are not
effectively promoting voluntary
compliance. |
Exhibit 20.1.1.6-2 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Relief—Application Chart
|
PENALTY
RELIEF—APPLICATION CHART |
|
IRC Section |
Type of
Penalty |
Reasonable
Cause Relief |
Other
Relief |
|
6651(a)(1) |
Failure to
File |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6651(a)(2) |
Failure to
Pay when due |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6651(a)(3) |
Failure to
Pay within 10 Days of Notice of
Additional Tax Due |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6651(d) |
Failure to
Pay within 10 Days of Final Notice and
Demand |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6651(f) |
Fraudulent
Failure to File |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6652(a)(1)** |
Failure to
File Information Returns |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6652(c)(1) |
Failure to
File Annual Return by Exempt
Organization |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6652(c)(2) |
Failure to
File Returns under IRC Section 6034 or
6043(b) |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6652(d)(2) |
Notification
of Change in Status of a Plan |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6652(e) |
Information
Required in Connection with Certain
Plans of Deferred Compensation—Form 5500 |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6652(h) |
Failure to
Give Notice to Recipients of Certain
Pension, etc, Distributions |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6652(i) |
Failure to
Give Written Explanation to Recipients
of Certain Qualifying Rollover
Distributions |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6653(a)* |
Negligence |
No |
Yes* |
|
6653(b)* |
Fraud |
No |
Yes* |
|
6654 |
Estimated
Tax Penalty on Individuals |
No |
Statutory
Exception |
|
6655 |
Estimated
Tax Penalty on Corporations |
No |
No |
|
6656(a) |
Failure to
Deposit |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6657 |
Bad Check |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6659* |
Valuation
Overstatement |
No |
Yes |
|
6659A* |
Overstatement of Pension Liabilities |
No |
Yes |
|
6661* |
Substantial
Understatement |
No |
Yes |
|
6662 |
Accuracy-Related |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6663 |
Fraud |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6692 |
Failure to
File Actuarial Report |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6698 |
Failure to
File Partnership Return |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6721 |
Failure to
File Correct Information Reporting
Returns |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6722 |
Failure to
Furnish Correct Payee Statements |
Yes |
Yes |
|
6723 |
Failure to
Comply with other Information Reporting
Requirements |
Yes |
Yes |
* Repealed for
tax returns filed after December 31,
1989
** Repealed for tax returns filed
after December 31, 1986 |
Exhibit 20.1.1.6-3 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Reason Code Chart
PENALTY
REASON CODE (PRC) CHART
COMPUTER
GENERATED |
|
ORIGIN |
PENALTY
REASON CODE |
DEFINITION |
|
|
|
Systemic |
|
|
|
|
01 |
Suppressed/Abated—LEM criteria |
|
|
02 |
Penalty
adjusted due to computational error |
|
|
03 |
Master File
Recovery |
|
|
|
Taxpayer |
|
|
|
|
10 |
Corrected/Amended return, Original
return taxpayer prepared |
|
|
13 |
Corrected/Amended return, Original
return prepared by the Service
(SFR/6020B) |
|
|
14 |
Misapplied/misdated payment (TP/Bank) |
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
|
|
15 |
General
Service Error
(134) |
|
|
*21 |
LEM Criteria |
|
|
PENALTY
REASON CODE CHART (PRC)
MANUAL INPUT
|
|
|
|
ORIGIN |
PENALTY
REASON CODE |
DEFINITION |
|
|
Reasonable Cause
(RC62) |
|
|
|
|
22 |
Taxpayer
exercised ordinary business care and
prudence.
20.1.1.3.1.2 |
|
|
24 |
Death,
Serious illness or Unavoidable absence
of taxpayer or immediate family member
of the party responsible. (IMF)
20.1.1.3.1.2.4 |
|
|
25 |
Records
inaccessible.
20.1.1.3.1.2.5 |
|
|
26 |
Death,
Serious illness or Unavoidable absence
of party responsible (or member of
immediate family). (BMF)
20.1.1.3.1.2.4 |
|
|
*30 |
Other
20.1.1.3 |
|
|
|
General Penalty
Relief |
|
|
|
|
*43 |
Administrative Waiver
20.1.1.3.2 |
|
|
*31 |
Erroneous
oral
advice from the Service
20.1.1.3.2.4.2 |
|
|
*44 |
Statutory
Exception 20.1.1.3.2 |
|
|
23 |
Taxpayer
relied on practitioner or third party
20.1.1.3.2.4.3 |
|
|
27 |
Timely
mailed/timely filed
20.1.1.3.2.3 |
|
|
28 |
Disaster
Area 20.1.1.3.2.6 |
|
|
29 |
Undue
economic hardship/inability to pay
20.1.1.3.2.3 |
|
|
*45 |
Service
Error 20.1.1.3.3 |
|
|
|
Appeals |
|
|
|
|
* 40 |
Appeals
abatement (Hazards of Litigation) |
|
|
*41 |
Appeals
sustains penalty |
|
|
*42 |
Appeals
partially sustains penalty |
Exhibit 20.1.1.6-4 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Transaction Codes
|
Penalty
Transaction Codes |
|
TC |
IRC section |
Description |
|
16X |
6651(a)(1) |
Failure to
File a Tax Return (FTF). The FTF penalty
is equal to the appropriate percentage
of the net tax due multiplied by each
month or part of a month (not to exceed
5 months) the return is not filed:
|
|
|
|
4 1/2% if
the FTP also applies, or
5% if only the FTF applies.
|
|
17X |
6654 |
Failure by
an Individual to pay Estimated Income
Tax, and |
|
|
6655 |
Failure by a
Corporation to pay Estimated Income Tax. |
|
|
|
The excess
of the required installment (either
individual or corporate) minus the
amount paid or credited on or before the
due date of the installment is the
underpayment. |
|
|
|
To determine
the penalty for each installment,
multiply: |
|
|
|
|
—the penalty
rate (the underpayment interest rate for
the applicable quarter) |
|
|
|
|
—by the
amount of the underpayment, |
|
|
|
|
—for the
period of the underpayment (the earlier
of the date the payment is received or
the return due date. |
|
18X |
6656 |
Failure to
Deposit. The penalty is based on the: |
|
|
|
|
—underpayment of the under deposited
amount, and |
|
|
|
|
—the number
of days between the deposit liability
due date and the date the deposit is
received. |
|
|
|
|
2%— |
1 to 5 days
late, |
|
|
|
|
5%— |
6 to 15 days
late, |
|
|
|
|
10%— |
more than 15
days but before 10 days after notice and
demand, or |
|
|
|
|
15%— |
payments
received more than 10 days after notice
and demand. |
|
|
|
|
10%— |
FTD
Avoidance Penalty |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments,
made directly to the IRS, or deposits
made to a bank when the employer is
required to deposit electronically. |
|
20X |
6723 |
Failure to
provide a Taxpayer Identification Number
(TIN). The penalty is $50 per failure,
not to exceed $100,000. |
|
23X |
6652(c) |
Daily
Delinquency Penalty—$10 times the number
of days the return was filed after the
due date or extended due date, not to
exceed $5,000. |
|
240** |
|
Assesses a
Miscellaneous Penalty generally
associated with a Reference Number. |
|
241** |
|
Abates a
Miscellaneous Penalty generally
associated with a Reference Number. |
|
246 |
6698 |
Assesses the
Failure to File a Partnership return or
missing information associated with a
partnership return. The penalty is $50
per partner, per month, for not more
than 5 months. |
|
247 |
|
Abates the
Failure to File a Partnership return or
missing information penalty associated
with a partnership return. |
|
27X |
6651(a)2 |
Failure to
Pay (FTP) is 1/2
of 1% (.005) per month, for each month
or part of a month, from the due date of
the return to the date the tax is paid
or the maximum of 25% of the unpaid tax
is reached, or |
|
|
6651(a)3 |
Failure to
Pay is 1/2 of 1%
(.005) for each month or part of a
month, from 10 days after notice and
demand until the tax is paid or the
maximum of 25% of the unpaid tax is
reached, or |
|
|
6651(d) |
Increases
the penalty from 1/2
of 1% (.005) to 1% (.01) per month, the
earlier of the day on which notice and
demand for immediate payment is given or
10 days after the service has issued the
notice of intent to levy. |
|
28X |
6657 |
Bad Check
Penalty— |
|
|
|
If the
check— |
|
|
|
|
is $750 or
more, the penalty is 2 percent of the
amount of the check, |
|
|
|
|
is less than
$750, the penalty is the penalty is the
lesser of: |
|
|
|
|
|
$15, or |
|
|
|
|
|
the amount
of the check. |
|
31X* |
6652(b) |
Failure to
Report Tips Penalty—imposes a penalty on
the employee (who received the tips)
equal to 50 percent of the employee’s
portion of the FICA tax or Railroad
Retirement tax applicable to the tip
amount that was not reported at the time
and in the manner required. |
|
32X* |
6653(b)R |
Fraud
Penalties assessed for returns with a
due date prior to January 1, 1990. |
|
|
6663 |
Fraud
Penalties assessed on returns due after
December 31, 1989. |
|
35X* |
6662(c) |
Negligence
penalties assessed for returns with a
due date after December 31, 1989, are
20% of the underpayment of tax due to
negligence. |
|
R |
This IRC
section was
repealed
, the law may or may not have
been incorporated into another Code
section. |
|
|
|
|
* |
The penalty
was assessed as the result on an
examination or other compliance employee
determination. These penalties should be
abated only
by the area responsible for assessing
the penalty or by Appeals. |
|
|
|
|
** |
See
Reference Numbers in Exhibits 20.1.1–5
and 20.1.1–6. |
Exhibit 20.1.1.6-5 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Reference Numbers (500 Series)
|
Penalties
assessed using the reference numbers 500
through 514 are assessed using the
following computational formula. Only
one penalty, per return, can be assessed
regardless of the number of failures
associated with that return. Therefore,
the computer paragraph associated with
the respective reference number relates
to the type of failure, not the way the
penalty was computed. |
|
RN |
IRC section |
Description |
|
|
6721 |
Imposition
of the Failure to Comply with Certain
Information Reporting Requirements. |
|
|
|
♦ |
These
reference numbers should only be used
for returns and statements due after
December 31, 1989. |
|
|
|
♦ |
$50 per
failure/maximum $250,000. |
|
|
|
♦ |
$15 per
failure/maximum $75,000, If a failure is
corrected
within 30 days, after the due date of
the return of the information
return, i.e., the penalty will be
decreased to $15 per failure.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
$30 per
failure/maximum $150,000, If the failure
is corrected
more than 30 days after the due date of
the return, but on or before August 1 of
the filing year, i.e., the
penalty will be decreased to $30 per
failure. |
|
500 |
6721 |
Late Filing
Penalty |
|
|
|
♦ |
A penalty is
charged for each Form 1098, 1099( 1),
W–2G, or W–2 that was not correctly and
timely filed. |
|
501 |
6721 |
Magnetic
Media Penalty |
|
|
|
♦ |
A penalty is
charged for each Form 1098, 1099, W–2G,
or W–2 (after the first 250 forms of
each type) required by IRC section
6011(e)(2)(a) not filed either
electronically or by magnetic media.
|
|
502 |
6721 |
Missing or
Incorrect TIN Penalty |
|
|
|
♦ |
A penalty is
charged for each Form 1098, 1099, W–2G,
or W–2 submitted with missing or
incorrect TINs. |
|
503 |
6721 |
Improper
Format Penalty |
|
|
|
♦ |
A penalty is
charged for each Form 1098, 1099, W–2G,
or W–2 submitted in an improper format
as provided for in either the IRC,
Treas. Regs, or SSA procedures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
Any applicable suffix |
|
504 |
6721 |
Late and
Magnetic Media Penalty |
|
|
|
A penalty is
charged for each Form 1098, 1099, W–2G,
or W–2 that was not filed: |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
correctly
and timely, and |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
either
electronically or using magnetic media.
(over 250 forms) |
|
505 |
6721 |
Late and
Missing or Incorrect TIN Penalty |
|
|
|
A penalty is
charged for each Form 1098, 1099, W–2G,
or W–2 that was not: |
|
|
|
♦ |
correctly
and timely filed, and |
|
|
|
♦ |
submitted
with a missing or incorrect TIN. |
|
506 |
6721 |
Late and
Improper Format Penalty |
|
|
|
A penalty is
charged for each Form 1098, 1099, W–2G,
or W–2 that was not: |
|
|
|
♦ |
correctly
and timely filed, and |
|
507 |
6721 |
Magnetic
Media and Missing or Incorrect TIN
Penalty |
|
|
|
A penalty is
charged for each Form 1098, 1099, W–2G,
or W–2 that was: |
|
|
|
♦ |
not filed
either electronically or using magnetic
media, (over 250 forms) and |
|
|
|
♦ |
filed with
missing or incorrect TINs. |
|
508 |
6721 |
Magnetic
Media and Improper Format Penalty |
|
|
|
A penalty is
charged for each Form 1098, 1099, W–2G,
or W–2 that was not: |
|
|
|
♦ |
filed either
electronically or using magnetic media,
and |
|
|
|
♦ |
submitted in
the proper format as provided for in
either the IRC, Treas. Regs. or SSA
procedures. |
|
509 |
6721 |
Missing or
Incorrect TIN and Improper Format
Penalty |
|
|
|
A penalty is
charged for each Form 1098, 1099, W–2G,
or W–2 that was filed: |
|
|
|
♦ |
with a
missing or incorrect TIN, and |
|
|
|
♦ |
in an
improper format as provided for in
either the IRC, Treas. Regs. or SSA
procedures. |
|
510 |
6721 |
Late,
Magnetic Media, and Missing or Incorrect
TIN Penalty |
|
|
|
A penalty is
charged for each Form 1098, 1099, W–2G,
or W–2 that was: |
|
|
|
♦ |
not
correctly and timely filed, |
|
|
|
♦ |
not filed
either electronically or by magnetic
media (after the first 250 forms of each
type) required by IRC section
6011(e)(2)(a), and |
|
|
|
♦ |
filed with
missing or incorrect TINs. |
|
511 |
6721 |
Late,
Magnetic Media, and Improper Format
Penalty |
|
|
|
A penalty is
charged for each Form 1098, 1099, W–2G,
or W–2 that was not: |
|
|
|
♦ |
correctly
and timely filed, |
|
|
|
♦ |
filed either
electronically or by magnetic media
(after the first 250 forms of each type)
required by IRC section 6011(e)(2)(a),
and |
|
|
|
♦ |
submitted in
the proper format as provided for in
either the IRC, Treas. Regs. or SSA
procedures. |
|
512 |
6721 |
Late,
Missing or Incorrect TIN, and Improper
Format Penalty |
|
|
|
A penalty is
charged for each Form 1098, 1099, W–2G,
or W–2 that was: |
|
|
|
♦ |
not
correctly and timely filed, |
|
|
|
♦ |
filed with
missing or incorrect TINs, and |
|
|
|
♦ |
not
submitted in the proper format as
provided for in either the IRC, Treas.
Regs. or SSA procedures. |
|
513 |
6721 |
Magnetic
Media, Missing or Incorrect TIN, and
Improper Format Penalty |
|
|
|
A penalty is
charged for each Form 1098, 1099, W–2G,
or W–2 that was: |
|
|
|
♦ |
not filed
either electronically or using magnetic
media, |
|
|
|
♦ |
filed with
missing or incorrect TINs, and |
|
|
|
♦ |
not
submitted in the proper format as
provided for in either the IRC, Treas.
Regs. or SSA procedures. |
|
514 |
6721 |
Late,
Magnetic Media, Missing or Incorrect
TIN, and Improper Format Penalty |
|
|
|
A penalty is
charged for each Form 1098, 1099, W–2G,
or W–2 that was: |
|
|
|
♦ |
not
correctly and timely filed, |
|
|
|
♦ |
either
electronically or using magnetic media, |
|
|
|
♦ |
filed with
missing or incorrect TINs, and |
|
|
|
♦ |
not
submitted in the proper format as
provided for in either the IRC, Treas.
Regs. or SSA procedures. |
|
549 |
6721(e) |
Penalty in
the Case of Intentional Disregard. (CAWR
Penalty Program) |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $100 per failure to file
Form W–2. |
|
|
|
♦ |
A penalty is
charged for each form W–2 that was not
filed as required by IRC section 6051. |
Exhibit 20.1.1.6-6 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Reference Numbers (600 Series)
|
RN |
IRC section |
Description |
|
600 |
6721 |
Failure to
File Correct Information Returns. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number should only be used for
returns and statements due after
December 31, 1989. |
|
|
|
♦ |
$50 per
failure/maximum $250,000. |
|
|
|
♦ |
$15 per
failure/maximum $75,000. If a failure is
corrected
within 30 days, after the due date of
the information return, the
penalty will be decreased to $15 per
failure. The maximum annual penalty per
filer shall not exceed $75,000.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
$30 per
failure/maximum $150,000. If the failure
is corrected more than 30 days after the
due date of the return, but on or before
August 1st of the filing year, the
penalty will be decreased to $30 per
failure. The maximum annual penalty per
filer shall not exceed $150,000.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
For other
circumstances that may apply, see IRM
20.1.10. |
|
601 |
6723 |
Failure to
Include Correct Information. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number should only be used for
return periods beginning after
December 31,
1985 and ending prior to January 1,
1990. |
|
|
|
♦ |
$5 per
failure, with a maximum not to exceed
$20,000. |
|
602 |
6676 |
Failure to
Supply Identifying Numbers. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number should only be used for
returns and statements due
prior to
January 1, 1990. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
was incorporated into IRC section 6723. |
|
603 |
6676 |
Failure to
Supply Identifying Numbers. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number should only be used for
returns and statements due
prior to
January 1, 1990. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The TIN
penalty was incorporated into IRC 6721
for information returns and IRC section
6723 for other documents. |
|
604 |
6676 |
Failure to
Supply Identifying Numbers. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number should only be used for
returns and statements due
prior to
January 1, 1990. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The TIN
penalty was incorporated into IRC 6721
for information returns and IRC section
6723 for other documents. |
|
605 |
6676 |
Failure to
Supply Identifying Numbers. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number should only be used for
returns and statements due
prior to
January 1, 1990. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The TIN
penalty was incorporated into IRC 6721
for information returns and IRC section
6723 for other documents. |
|
606 |
6676 |
Failure to
Supply Identifying Numbers. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number should only be used for
returns and statements due
prior to
January 1, 1990. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The TIN
penalty was incorporated into IRC 6721
for information returns and IRC section
6723 for other documents. |
|
607 |
6721 |
Failure to
File a Correct Information Returns. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number should only be used for
returns due
after December 31, 1986 and before
January 1, 1990. |
|
608 |
6721 |
Failure to
File a Correct Information Returns. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number should only be used for
Forms 1099 INT, DIV, and PATR returns
due after
December 31, 1985 and before January 1,
1990. |
|
609 |
6721 |
Failure to
File a Complete Form 8300, Report of
Cash Payments Over $10,000. (Detroit
Computing Center) |
|
610 |
6722 |
Failure to
Furnish Correct Payee Statement. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number should only be used for
returns due
after December 31, 1986 and before
January 1, 1990. |
|
611 |
6722 |
Failure to
Furnish Correct Payee Statement. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number should only be used for
Forms 1099 INT, DIV, OID, and PATR
returns due
after December 31, 1986 and before
January 1, 1990. |
|
612 |
6722 |
Failure to
Furnish Correct Payee Statement. |
|
|
|
♦ |
For returns
required to be filed
after
December 31, 1989, a penalty
will be imposed for each failure to:
|
|
|
|
|
♦ |
furnish a
payee statement on or before the due
date to the person to whom the statement
must be furnished, |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
furnish all
information required, and |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
furnish
correct information. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The $50
penalty for failure to furnish payee
statements is not reduced if returns are
corrected or filed after the due date. |
|
|
|
♦ |
Only one
penalty per statement, regardless of the
number of failures per statement. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The total
penalty for all such failures during any
calendar year shall not exceed $100,000. |
|
613 |
6679 |
Failure to
File Returns, Etc, With Respect to
Foreign Corporations or Foreign
Partnerships. |
|
|
|
♦ |
Failure to
File Form 5471 and Schedule O. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $1,000 per failure. |
|
614 |
6679 |
Failure to
File Returns, Etc, With Respect to
Foreign Corporations or Foreign
Partnerships. |
|
|
|
♦ |
Failure to
File Form 5471 and Schedule N. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $1,000 per failure. |
|
615 |
6682 |
False
Information with Respect to Withholding. |
|
|
|
♦ |
False
information on Form W–9. |
|
|
|
♦ |
$500 for
each false statement (W–9). |
|
616 |
6682 |
False
Information with Respect to Withholding. |
|
|
|
♦ |
False
information on Form W–4. |
|
|
|
♦ |
$500 for
each false statement (W–4). |
|
617 |
6723 |
Failure to
Include Correct Information. This
reference number should only be used for
returns due
after December 31, 1986, and before
January 1, 1990. |
|
|
|
♦ |
See
reference number 647 and 648 for 6723
penalty computation. |
|
618 |
6672 |
Failure to
Collect and Pay Over Tax, or an Attempt
to Evade or Defeat Tax. |
|
|
|
♦ |
Trust Fund
Recovery Program. The penalty is
assessed against responsible corporate
officers. |
|
|
|
♦ |
100% of the
tax required to be collected, accounted
for, and paid over. |
|
619 |
6679 |
Failure to
File Returns with Respect to Foreign
Corporations or Foreign Partnerships. |
|
|
|
♦ |
Failure to
File such form as Treas. Reg. provides |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $1,000 per failure. |
|
620 |
6693 |
Failure to
Provide Reports on Individual Retirement
Accounts or Annuities. |
|
|
6693(b)(1) |
Overstatement of Designated
Non-deductible Contributions—$100 per
overstatement, |
|
|
6693(b)(2) |
Failure to
File an IRA Form—$50 per failure, |
|
621 |
6723 |
Failure to
Comply with Other Reporting
Requirements. |
|
|
|
♦ |
For returns
and statements required to be filed
after
December 31, 1989,
|
|
|
|
♦ |
A penalty of
$50 per failure |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
to comply
timely with specified information
reporting requirements, or |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
to include
correct information. |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The maximum
penalty is $100,000 per year. |
|
622 |
6694(a) |
Understatement of Taxpayer’s Liability
by Income Tax Return Preparer. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number should only be used for
documents prepared prior to
January 1,
1990. |
|
|
|
♦ |
Prior to
January 1, 1990, this penalty
was assessed at $100 per return or claim
for refund. |
|
623 |
6038(b) |
Failure to
Furnish Information with Respect to
Certain Foreign Corporations. |
|
|
|
♦ |
Failure to
File Form 5471 and Schedule M. |
|
|
|
♦ |
$1,000 per
accounting period. If the failure
continues for more than 90 days after
notice of failure mailed an additional
$1,000 for each subsequent 30-day period
not to exceed $24,000. |
|
624 |
6695 |
Other
Assessable Penalties with Respect to the
Preparation of Income Tax Returns for
Other Persons. |
|
|
|
♦ |
Any failure
by the preparer to: |
|
|
6695(a) |
|
furnish a
copy of the return to the taxpayer, |
|
|
6695(b) |
|
sign the
return, |
|
|
6695(c) |
|
furnish the
preparer’s identifying number, |
|
|
6695(d) |
|
retain a
copy, return or list, as required by IRC
6107(b), |
|
|
6695(e) |
|
file a
correct information return or other
requirement of IRC 6060. |
|
|
|
♦ |
these
penalties are assessed at $50 per
failure, not to exceed $25,000 per year. |
|
625 |
6038A(d) |
Information
with Respect to Certain Foreign owned
Corporations. |
|
|
|
♦ |
failure to
furnish information or maintain records
as required by IRC 6038A(a) and 6038A(b) |
|
|
|
♦ |
$10,000 for
each taxable year with respect to which
the failure occurs. If the failure
continues for more than 90 days after
notice of failure mailed, an additional
$10,000 is imposed for each 30-day
period during which the failure
continues after the expiration of the
original 90 day period. |
|
626 |
6695(d) |
Other
Assessable Penalties with Respect to the
Preparation of Income Tax Returns for
Other Persons. |
|
|
|
♦ |
endorses or
otherwise negotiates a refund check
(made with respect to income tax) issued
to a taxpayer. |
|
|
|
♦ |
$500 per
check. |
|
627 |
|
Reserved |
|
628 |
6700 |
Promoting
Abusive Tax Shelters |
|
|
|
♦ |
the lessor
of $1,000 or 100% of the gross income
for each such activity. |
|
629 |
|
Reserved |
|
630 |
6701 |
Penalties
for Aiding and Abetting Understatement
of Tax Liability. |
|
|
|
♦ |
Aiding and
abetting—
Promoter |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed for each document that
relates to the tax liability of: |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ noncorporate—at $1,000, or
♦ corporate—at $10,000 |
|
631 |
6701 |
Penalties
for Aiding and Abetting Understatement
of Tax Liability. |
|
|
|
♦ |
Aiding and
abetting—
Preparer |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed for each document that
relates to the tax liability of: |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
non-corporate—at $1,000, or |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
corporate—at
$10,000. |
|
632 |
6705 |
Failure by a
Broker to Provide Notice to a Payor. |
|
|
|
♦ |
$500 for
each failure. |
|
633 |
6713 |
Disclosure
or Use of Information by Preparer of
Returns |
|
|
|
♦ |
$250 per
disclosure or use with a maximum of
$10,000 per calendar year. |
|
634 |
6707 |
Failure to
Furnish Information Regarding Tax
Shelters |
|
|
|
♦ |
the greater
of 1 percent of the amount invested, or |
|
|
|
♦ |
$500. |
|
635 |
7216 |
Disclosure
or Use of Information by Preparers of
Returns. |
|
|
|
♦ |
when
convicted of knowingly or recklessly
disclosing information (misdemeanor),
the person shall be: |
|
|
|
♦ |
fined no
more than $1,000, or |
|
|
|
♦ |
imprisoned
not more than 1 year, or |
|
|
|
♦ |
both, plus |
|
|
|
♦ |
the cost of
the prosecution. |
|
636 |
6708 |
Failure to
Maintain Lists of Investors in
Potentially Abusive Tax Shelters. |
|
|
|
♦ |
$50 per
failure, |
|
|
|
♦ |
not to
exceed $100,000 per calendar year. |
|
637 |
6676 |
Failure to
Supply Identifying Numbers. This
reference number should only be used for
returns due
prior to January 1, 1990.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
was incorporated into IRC section 6723. |
|
638 |
6652 |
Failure to
Supply Identifying Numbers. This
reference number should only be used for
returns due
prior to January 1, 1990.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
was incorporated into IRC section 6721. |
|
639 |
6652 |
Failure to
Supply Identifying Numbers. This
reference number should only be used for
returns due
prior to January 1, 1990.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
was incorporated into IRC section 6721. |
|
640 |
6652 |
Failure to
Supply Identifying Numbers. This
reference number should only be used for
returns due
prior to January 1, 1990.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
was incorporated into IRC section 6721. |
|
641 |
6652 |
Failure to
Supply Identifying Numbers. This
reference number should only be used for
returns due
prior to January 1, 1990.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
was incorporated into IRC section 6721. |
|
642 |
6673(a) |
Sanctions
and costs awarded by Courts |
|
|
|
♦ |
A Tax Court
determined that the taxpayer filed
frivolous suit for damages against the
United States. |
|
|
|
♦ |
Court
awarded sanctions, penalties, or costs
not to exceed $25,000. |
|
643 |
6673(b) |
Sanctions
and costs awarded by Courts (IRC section
7433). |
|
|
|
♦ |
A Court
(other than the Tax Court) determination
that the taxpayer filed frivolous suit
for damages against the United States. |
|
|
|
♦ |
Court
awarded sanctions, penalties, or costs
not to exceed $10,000. |
|
678 |
6706(b) |
Failure to
furnish information required under
Section 1275(c)(2) on debt instrument. |
|
|
|
♦ |
Penalty of
1% of the aggregate issue price of such
issue, not to exceed $50,000, unless
failure is due to reasonable cause and
not willful neglect. |
|
645 |
6694(a) |
Understatement of Taxpayer’s Liability
by Income Tax Return Preparer. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number is to be used for
documents prepared
after
December 31, 1989.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed against an income tax
preparer. |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is based on an understatement or return
for which the preparer took a position
that did not have a realistic
possibility of being sustained on its
merits, and |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
which was
not disclosed or was frivolous. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $250 per return or claim. |
|
646 |
6694(b) |
Understatement of Taxpayer’s Liability
by Income Tax Return Preparer. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number should only be used for
documents prepared prior to
January 1,
1990. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed: |
|
|
|
|
if any part
of the understatement is due to willful
attempt to understate the tax liability
or reckless conduct in preparing the
return or claim. |
|
|
|
|
at $500 per
return or claim reduced by any amount
assessed under 6694(a). |
|
647 |
6723 |
Failure to
Include Correct Information. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number should only be used for
returns prepared prior to
January 1,
1990. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
was
self-assessed at $5 for each
return or statement that was reported
incorrectly. |
|
648 |
6723 |
Failure to
Include Correct Information. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number should only be used for
returns due prior to
January 1,
1990. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
was at $5 for each return or statement
that was reported incorrectly. |
|
649 |
6652(c)(2) |
Failure by
Exempt Organization or Certain Trusts to
file returns required by IRC 6034 or
6043(b). |
|
|
|
♦ |
For any one
return, the penalty is assessed at $10
per day, not to exceed $5,000 for all
persons for the failure to file any one
return. |
|
650 |
6694(b) |
Understatement of Taxpayer’s Liability
by Income Tax Return Preparer. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number should only be used for
documents prepared after
December 31,
1989. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed if any part of the
understatement is due to willful or
reckless conduct or intentional
disregard of the rules or regulations in
preparing the return or claim for
refund. |
|
|
|
♦ |
After
December 31,
1989 this penalty was
assessed at $1,000 per return or claim
reduced by any amount of penalty paid
under 6694(a). |
|
651 |
6721 |
Failure to
Comply with Certain Information
Reporting Requirements—Form 8300. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This penalty
applies to returns required to be filed
after
December 31, 1989.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $50 per Form 8300 not
timely and correctly filed. |
|
652 |
6721(e) |
Intentional
Disregard of the Failure to comply with
Certain Information Reporting
Requirements. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This
reference number is used to assess the
intentional disregard penalty when the
Form 8300 is not timely or correctly
filed. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This penalty
applies to returns pertaining to amounts
received
after November 5, 1990.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at the greater of: |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
$25,000, or |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
the amount
of cash received in such transaction, to
the extent the cash does not exceed
$100,000. |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The $250,000
yearly limitation under IRC 6721 shall
not apply. |
|
653 |
6722 |
Failure to
Furnish Correct Payee Statements |
|
|
|
♦ |
This penalty
applies to payee statements required to
be filed
after December 31, 1989.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $50 per payee statement
not timely furnished or containing
incorrect or incomplete information. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The maximum
penalty shall not exceed $100,000 per
year. |
|
654 |
6722(c) |
Intentional
Disregard of the Requirement to Furnish
a Correct Payee Statement—Form 8300. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This penalty
applies to payee statements required to
be filed
after December 31, 1989.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The
intentional disregard penalty for
failing to provide a payor of cash with
a statement as required by IRC sections
6050I(e) after December 31, 1989, is the
greater of $100 or 10 percent of the
amount required to be reported correctly
on the statement. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The $100,000
yearly limitation does not apply. |
|
655 |
7342(c) |
Penalty for
Refusal to Permit Entry or Examination. |
|
|
|
♦ |
A penalty of
$500 for each refusal to admit entry or
to permit examination. |
|
|
|
♦ |
A penalty of
$1,000 for each refusal to admit entry
or to permit examination if the refusal
is related to 4083(c), place where
taxable fuel is stored or produced.
|
|
656 |
6715 |
Dyed Fuel
Sold For Use or Used in Taxable Use,
Etc. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This penalty
is effective beginning
after
December 31, 1993.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed on any dyed diesel fuel
(nontaxable use), sold or held for sale
as taxable use of such fuel. |
|
|
|
♦ |
1st offense: |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is the greater of $10 per gallon of dyed
fuel involved, or $1,000, |
|
|
|
♦ |
subsequent
violations: |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
multiply the
number of prior violations times the
greater of $10 per gallon per prior
violation or $1,000 per prior violation. |
|
657 |
6715 |
Failure to
Post or Provide Notice with Respect to
any Dyed Diesel Fuel as required by IRC
section 4082(c). |
|
|
|
♦ |
This penalty
is effective beginning
after
December 31, 1993.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed on any dyed diesel fuel
(non-taxable use), sold or held for sale
as taxable use of such fuel. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is the greater of: |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
1st offense,
$10 per gallon, or $1,000, |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
subsequent
violations, multiply the number of
violations times the greater of $10 per
gallon or $1,000. |
|
658 |
|
Reserved |
|
659 |
|
Reserved |
|
660 |
|
Reserved |
|
661 |
|
Reserved |
|
662 |
|
Reserved |
|
663 |
|
Reserved |
|
664 |
|
Reserved |
|
665 |
6702 |
Frivolous
Income Tax Return. |
|
|
|
♦ |
If any
individual files what purports to be an
income tax return, which either: |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
contains
insufficient information, or |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
contains on
its face substantially incorrect
information, and |
|
|
|
♦ |
where the
conduct will delay or impede the
administration of Federal income tax
laws or is a frivolous position. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $500 per return deemed to
be frivolous. |
|
|
|
Each of the
following eight reference numbers relate
to a specific type of frivolous return. |
|
666 |
6702 |
Frivolous
arguments (General) to reduce taxes or
delay the collection of taxes. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $500 per return deemed to
be frivolous. |
|
667 |
6702 |
The "penalty
of perjury" statement was altered or
deleted |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $500 per return deemed to
be frivolous. |
|
668 |
6702 |
The return
did not contain enough information to be
processed. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $500 per return deemed to
be frivolous. |
|
669 |
6702 |
The claim
that wages not paid in gold or silver is
frivolous. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $500 per return deemed to
be frivolous. |
|
670 |
6702 |
The war
credit or deduction claimed is not
provided for in the Internal Revenue
Code. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $500 per return deemed to
be frivolous. |
|
671 |
6702 |
The credit
claimed for the decrease or discounted
value of Federal Reserve Notes
represents a frivolous position. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $500 per return deemed to
be frivolous. |
|
672 |
6702 |
The claim
that wages and payments for services are
not income or profits because there was
a fair exchange is a frivolous position.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $500 per return deemed to
be frivolous. |
|
673 |
6702 |
The refusal
to furnish information needed to
determine income tax liability on
constitutional grounds. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $500 per return. |
|
674 |
6723 |
Failure to
Comply with Other Reporting
Requirements. Failure to Provide Notice
of Partnership Exchange. |
|
|
|
♦ |
a penalty of
$50 is imposed for each failure to
comply timely with specified information
reporting requirements. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The maximum
penalty for failure to comply with all
specified information reporting
requirements is $100,000 per year. |
|
675 |
6722(b) |
Failure to
Notify Partnership of Exchanged of
Partnership Interest. |
|
|
|
♦ |
This penalty
applies to statements required to be
furnished
before January 1, 1990.
|
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at $50 per payee statement
not timely or correctly furnished. |
|
676 |
6038B |
Notice of
Certain Transfers to Foreign Persons
(Failure to File Form 926) |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at 25 percent of the amount
of the gain realized on the exchange. |
|
677 |
6677 |
Failure to
File Information Returns with Respect to
Certain Foreign Trusts. |
|
|
|
♦ |
5 percent of
the amount transferred to a trust, or |
|
|
|
♦ |
5 percent of
the value of the corpus of the trust at
the close of the taxable year, but |
|
|
|
♦ |
not more
than $1,000. |
|
678 |
6039E |
Failure to
provide Information concerning Residence
Status. |
|
|
|
♦ |
$500 for
each failure to provide the required
information. |
|
679 |
6039E |
Failure to
provide Information concerning Residence
Status. (Taxpayer Identification
Number). |
|
|
|
♦ |
$500 for
each failure to provide the required
information. |
|
|
6662 |
Imposition
of Accuracy-Related Penalty |
|
680 |
6662(f) |
Substantial
Overstatement of Pension Liabilities |
|
681 |
6662(d) |
Substantial
Understatement of Income Tax. |
|
682 |
6662(g) |
Substantial
Estate or Gift Tax Valuation
Understatement |
|
683 |
|
Reserved |
|
684 |
7519 |
Required
Payments for Entities Electing Not to
Have Required Taxable Year. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed for failing to make an
election payment. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at 10 percent of the under
paid amount and is assessed on MFT 15. |
|
685 |
6712 |
Failure to
Disclose Treaty-Based Return Position. |
|
|
|
♦ |
The penalty
is assessed at: |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
$1,000,
individual, |
|
|
|
|
♦ |
$10,000,
corporation. |
|
686 |
6651(f) |
Increase in
Penalty for Fraudulent Failure to File |
|
|
|
♦ |
15 percent
per month, |
|
|
|
♦ |
for a
maximum of 5 months, |
|
|
|
♦ |
not to
exceed 75 percent of the total tax. |
|
687 |
|
Reserved |
|
688 |
|
Reserved |
|
689 |
|
Reserved |
|
690 |
|
Reserved |
|
691 |
|
Reserved |
|
692 |
|
Reserved |
|
693 |
|
Reserved |
|
694 |
|
Reserved |
|
695 |
|
Reserved |
|
696 |
|
Reserved |
|
697 |
|
Reserved |
|
698 |
|
Reserved |
|
699 |
|
Reserved |
Exhibit 20.1.1.6-7 (08-20-1998)
Table of Abbreviations and Acronyms
|
ABBR. |
DEFINITION |
|
23C |
Assessment
Date |
|
ACH |
Automated
Clearing House |
|
ACR |
Audit Change
Report |
|
ADEPT |
Automated
Deposit of Electronic Payments for Taxes |
|
ADP |
Automatic
Data Processing |
|
AGI |
Adjusted
Gross Income |
|
AICPA |
American
Institute of Certified Public
Accountants |
|
AIMS |
Audit
Information Management System |
|
AO |
Appeals
Officer |
|
AOC |
Advice of
Credit |
|
ASED |
Assessment
Statute Expiration Date |
|
ASFR |
Automated
Substitute for Return |
|
ATAO |
Application
Taxpayer Assistance Order to Relieve
Hardship |
|
AT&F |
Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms |
|
BMF |
Business
Master File |
|
BWH |
Backup
Withholding |
|
CPS |
Case
Processing Support |
|
CAF |
Centralized
Authorization File |
|
CAWR |
Combined
Annual Wage Reporting |
|
CBAF |
Commercial
Bank Address File |
|
CC |
Command Code |
|
CCD |
Chief
Compliance Division |
|
CFR |
Code of
Federal Regulations |
|
CI |
Criminal
Investigation |
|
CP |
Computer
Paragraph |
|
CPA |
Certified
Public Accountant |
|
CPM |
Civil
Penalty Module |
|
CRS |
Communication Replacement System |
|
CSED |
Collection
Statute Expiration Date |
|
CY |
Calendar
Year |
|
CVPN |
Civil
Penalty Name Line |
|
DCC |
Detroit
Computing Center |
|
DLN |
Document
Locator Number |
|
DP |
Data
Processing |
|
EFC |
Electronic
Filing Coordinators |
|
EFP |
Electronic
Filing Program |
|
EIN |
Employer
Identification Number |
|
EMIS |
Enforcement
Management Information System |
|
EPMF |
Employee
Plans Master File |
|
EQTRAS |
Examination
Quality Trends Analysis System |
|
ERTA |
Economic
Recovery Tax Act of 1981 |
|
ES |
Estimated
Tax |
|
CPS |
Case
Processing Support |
|
ETE |
Employment
Tax Examiner |
|
FFA |
Fiduciary
FTD Avoidance |
|
FICA |
Federal
Insurance Contribution Act |
|
FIFO |
First-In-First-Out Inventory Method |
|
FFF |
Fraudulent
Failure to File |
|
FMS |
Financial
Management Service |
|
FRB |
Federal
Reserve Bank |
|
FRCS |
Federal
Reserve Communication System |
|
FTD |
Federal Tax
Deposit |
|
FTF |
Failure to
File |
|
FTP |
Failure to
Pay |
|
FUTA |
Federal
Unemployment Tax Act |
|
FY |
Fiscal Year |
|
GBP |
Good Block
Proof |
|
IC |
Interagency
Coordinator |
|
IAC |
Interest
Abatement Coordinator |
|
IDRS |
Integrated
Data Retrieval System |
|
IDTCA |
Interest and
Dividend Tax Compliance Act of 1983 |
|
IEP |
International Enforcement Program |
|
IMF |
Individual
Master File |
|
IMPACT |
Improved
Penalty Administration & Compliance Tax
Act of 1989 |
|
IRA |
Individual
Retirement Account |
|
IRAF |
Individual
Retirement Account File |
|
IRC |
Internal
Revenue Code |
|
IRM |
Internal
Revenue Manual |
|
IR Regs |
Internal
Revenue Regulations |
|
IRS |
Internal
Revenue Service |
|
IRS NO. |
Abstract
Number |
|
LEM |
Law
Enforcement Manual |
|
LIFO |
Last-In-First-Out Inventory Method |
|
LMQAS |
Line
Management Quality Assurance System |
|
MARS |
Manual
Accounting Replacement System |
|
MCC |
Martinsburg
Computing Center |
|
MCR |
Master
Control Records |
|
MF |
Master File |
|
MFT |
Master File
Tax |
|
MICRORAR |
Revenue
Agent Report-Computer Generated |
|
MSN |
Microfilm
Serial Number |
|
NASACT |
National
Association of State Auditors,
Comptrollers, and Treasurers |
|
NMF |
Non-Master
File |
|
OBRA |
Omnibus
Budget Reconciliation Act |
|
OCR |
Optical
Character Recognition |
|
ODC |
Ozone
Depleting Chemicals |
|
OPIA |
Penalties
and Interest Office |
|
PAS |
Program
Analysis System |
|
PCC |
Penalty
Computation Code |
|
PFN |
Partnership
Prefiling Notification |
|
PIC |
Penalty
Indicator Code |
|
PIL |
Preparer’s
Inventory Listing |
|
PINEX |
Penalty and
Interest Notice Explanations |
|
PMF |
Payer Master
File |
|
PNL |
Prefiling
Notification Letter |
|
PNP |
Presumptive
Negligence Penalty |
|
POA |
Power of
Attorney |
|
|
|
|
PSC |
Penalty
Screening Committee |
|
PVL |
Preparer’s
Volume Listing |
|
QAS |
Quality
Assurance Staff |
|
OBRA |
Omnibus
Reconciliation Act |
|
QR |
Quality
Review |
|
RAR |
Revenue
Agent Report |
|
RC |
Reason Code |
|
RDD |
Return Due
Date |
|
RFC |
Regulated
Futures Contract |
|
REMIC |
Real Estate
Mortgage Investment Conduit |
|
ROFT |
Record of
Federal Tax (deposit Liability schedule) |
|
RONT |
Record of
Net Tax Liability—Form 720 |
|
RRTA |
Railroad
Retirement Tax Act |
|
RSED |
Refund
Statute Expiration Date |
|
RURT |
Railroad
Unemployment Repayment Tax |
|
SCCF |
Service
Center Control File |
|
SIC |
Schedule
Indicator Code |
|
SFR |
Substitute
for Return |
|
SRTP |
Statement on
Responsibilities in Tax Practice |
|
SSA |
Social
Security Administration |
|
SSN |
Social
Security Number |
|
STAUP |
Command code
which stops collection activity |
|
TAMRA |
Technical &
Miscellaneous Revenue Act |
|
TC |
Transaction
Code |
|
TDA |
Taxpayer
Delinquent Account |
|
TDD |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf |
|
TECS |
Treasury
Enforcement Communication System |
|
TEFRA |
Tax Equity
Fiscal Responsibility Act (1982) |
|
TE/GE |
Tax
Exempt/Government Entities |
|
TIF |
Taxpayer
Information File |
|
TIN |
Taxpayer
Identification Number |
|
TLN |
Transmittal
Locator Number |
|
TP |
Taxpayer |
|
TRA’86 |
Tax Reform
Act of 1986 |
|
TSR |
Taxpayer
Service Representative |
|
TT&L |
Treasury Tax
and Loan Account |
|
TY |
Tax Year |
|
UNISTAR |
Unified
System for Time and Appeals Records |
|
UPC |
Unpostable
Code |
|
URB |
Underreporter Branch (Service Centers) |
Exhibit 20.1.1.6-8 (08-20-1998)
Dictionary of Key Terms
|
23C DATE
|
The date an
assessment is made. Assessment is
accomplished when the assessment officer
schedules the liability and signs the
assessment register (Form 23C,
Assessment Certificate, Summary Record
of Assessments). |
|
ABATEMENT
|
A reduction
in the assessment of tax, penalty, or
interest when it is determined the
assessment is incorrect, or when the
taxpayer should be relieved of a
liability, e.g., penalty abatement for
reasonable cause. |
|
ABSTRACT
NUMBER
|
A
three-digit number that references a
specific type of excise tax. The
abstract number will correspond exactly
with the IRS number shown on the excise
tax form, Form 720. See IRM 20.1.4.
|
|
ABSTRACTS
|
Reports that
identify the specific type of tax
collected, corresponding to the proper
appropriation account set by
Congressional Act or Public Law.
|
|
ACCOUNT
|
A record of
a taxpayer’s assessments, abatements and
credits. |
|
ACCRUALS
|
The increase
of interest and penalty amounts amassed
from the date a penalty or interest
assessment is posted to an account (23C
Date) to the date the amounts are paid.
|
|
ADVANCE
PAYMENT
|
The payment
made for an anticipated deficiency prior
to the actual assessment. |
|
ADVICE OF
CREDIT (AOC)
|
The
transmittal, on Treasury Form 2284, of
federal taxes paid to a depositary bank.
See IRM 20.1.4. |
|
ANNUAL
ACCOUNTING PERIOD
|
A
12-consecutive month period (calendar or
fiscal year) adopted by the taxpayer for
maintaining books and records. |
|
ASSERT
|
Determine
that tax, penalty, or interest applies
to a taxpayer account. See IRM 20.1.4. |
|
ASSESS
|
Formal entry
of tax debt including penalty, and/or
interest that has been determined to be
due and collectable by IRS. See IRM
20.1.4. |
|
ASSESSMENT
|
A
bookkeeping entry, recording the amount
of tax, penalties, and/or interest
charged to a taxpayer’s account. |
|
ASSESSMENT
DATE |
The date
Form 23C is executed by the assessment
officer. |
|
AUDIT TRAIL
|
Data used to
track case activity to follow the
development of an issue from the time it
is raised to the time it is resolved. |
|
AUTOMATIC
ADJUSTMENT
|
A subsequent
adjustment to an account which follows
automatically from the previous
adjustment. |
|
BALANCE DUE
|
The amount
of tax, penalty, interest or other
receivables that remain unpaid on a
taxpayer’s account. |
|
BLOCK
|
Returns or
documents that have been grouped
together for processing and filing
purposes. Blocks consist of one hundred
or fewer documents. |
|
BUSINESS
MASTER FILE (BMF)
|
The files
maintained by the IRS which include
business transactions and accounts.
These include employment taxes, income
taxes on businesses, use taxes, wagering
taxes, and excise taxes. |
|
BURDEN OF
PROOF |
The
necessity of affirmatively proving a
fact or facts in dispute on an issue. |
|
CALENDAR YEAR
|
A
12-consecutive month period beginning
with January 1. |
|
CHARITABLE
DEDUCTION PROPERTY
|
A taxpayer’s
contribution of real or personal
property to a charity for which a
deduction can be claimed under IRC
Section 170. |
|
CLAIM—FORMAL
|
A request
from the taxpayer on the proper form,
such as Form 843, 1040X or 1120X, asking
that a liability previously assessed be
reduced. |
|
CLAIM—INFORMAL
|
A written
request, other than on the proper form,
signed by the taxpayer, requesting
changes to obtain a correct and accurate
reflection of his/her tax liability.
|
|
COMMAND CODE
(CC) |
A five or
six character code used to access IDRS. |
|
COMMERCIAL
BANK ADDRESS FILE (CBAF)
|
A computer
listing of all authorized depositories
within each service center’s processing
area. |
|
COMPUTER
PARAGRAPH NOTICE (CP)
|
A computer
generated message relating to a
taxpayer’s account. |
|
CONTACT
PERSONNEL
|
Any IRS
employee who has direct contact with the
taxpayer either on the telephone, in
person, or by mail. |
|
CYCLE
|
One week’s
processing at the service center and
Martinsburg Computing Center. |
|
DEBIT BALANCE
|
The amount
by which the balance due exceeds the
total amount of credits. |
|
DELINQUENT
RETURN
|
A return
which is filed after the prescribed due
date (determined with regard to any
valid extension of time). |
|
DISCLOSURE
|
See IRC
section 6103 and IRC section 6664(c). |
|
DISHONORED
CHECK |
A taxpayer’s
check that a financial institution does
not accept for payment. See IRM 20.1.10. |
DOCUMENT CODE
(Doc Code)
|
The Code
which identifies the specific type of
return or document that was filed or
processed. See document 6209, ADP and
IDRS Information 1992, Section 2.
|
|
DOCUMENT
LOCATOR NUMBER (DLN)
|
A 14-digit
identification number assigned to every
return/document and entered into the ADP
system that affects a taxpayer account.
|
|
DOCUMENT
REGISTER
|
A numerical
listing of each item in a block of
returns or documents. The document
register serves as a transmittal for
each block of remittance returns.
|
|
DUE DATE
|
Date by
which a return must be filed or a
payment or deposit made. |
|
DUMMY MODULE
|
A tax module
created on IDRS in order to record
information when the true tax module is
not present. |
|
EIGHTH-MONTHLY PERIODS
|
See IRM
20.1.4. |
|
EMPLOYEE
PLANS MASTER FILE (EPMF)
|
The files
maintained by the IRS which include
transactions on Employee Plan accounts. |
|
EMPLOYER
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN)
|
A unique
nine-digit number used to identify a
taxpayer’s business account in a
NN–NNNNNNN format. |
|
ENTITY AREA
|
The portion
of an input document or tax return that
contains the name, address, account
number, tax period and other entity
data. |
|
FEDERAL
RESERVE BANK (FRB)
|
One of 12
banks of the Federal Reserve system
which verifies and classifies federal
tax deposits (FTD) monies collected
within its geographic jurisdiction.
|
|
FIDUCIARY FTD
AVOIDANCE (FFA)
|
The penalty
chargeable to third party fiduciaries
who do not submit their trusts’
estimated tax payments on magnetic tape
through the FTD system. |
|
FILE LOCATION
CODE (FLC)
|
The first
two digits of the DLN used to identify
the service center or district office
that initiated a transaction. See
Document 6209, Section 4 for a complete
list of FLCs. |
|
FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT SERVICE (FMS)
|
The Federal
agency responsible for the government’s
cash management program. FMS, rather
than IRS, has jurisdiction over
authorized financial institutions and
asserts sanctions against banks and
agents for misdating and mishandling
FTDs. |
|
FISCAL YEAR
|
An
accounting period of 12 consecutive
months other than a calendar year. |
|
FOREIGN-CONTROLLED CORPORATION
|
A domestic
corporation engaged in U.S. business and
controlled by a foreign person. |
|
FRAUD
|
The
intentional commission of an act or acts
for the specific purpose of evading a
tax believed to be owing. |
|
FREEZE CODE
|
A condition
on an account which prohibits any
further action being taken. |
|
FRIVOLOUS
|
Clearly
lacking in substance, or clearly
insufficient as a matter of law. |
|
GENERATED
DATA |
Information
produced as a result of input to, or
update of, IDRS or Master File. |
|
HARDSHIP
|
In general,
an economic condition that is so severe
that the taxpayer is, or would be
financially debilitated if they satisfy
their obligation. See IRM 20.1.1,
reasonable cause. |
|
INDIVIDUAL
MASTER FILE (IMF)
|
The files
maintained by the IRS which include
transactions on individual tax accounts. |
|
INDIVIDUAL
RETIREMENT ACCOUNT FILE (IRAF)
|
The files
maintained by the IRS which include
transactions on Individual Retirement
Accounts. |
|
INTEGRATED
DATA RETRIEVAL SYSTEM (IDRS)
|
A computer
system capable of retrieving or updating
stored information which works in
conjunction with the Master File records
of a taxpayer’s account. |
|
INTERAGENCY
COORDINATOR (IAC)
|
The
designated employee in the FTD unit of
the SC Accounting Branch who is a
liaison between IRS, FRB, commercial
banks and reporting agents. |
|
INDIVIDUAL
TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (ITIN)
|
A taxpayer
identifying number issued by the IRS to
an alien individual who is ineligible to
receive an SSN for the purpose of
reporting tax related information.
|
|
JULIAN DATE
|
The numeric
day of the year starting with 001 on
January 1 and continuing sequentially to
365 (or 366). |
|
LEVY
|
An
administrative means of collecting taxes
by seizure of the taxpayer’s property
and rights to property to satisfy
delinquent taxes. |
|
MASTER FILE
TAX (MFT) CODE
|
A two-digit
code that identifies the type of return
filed and the tax class. See Document
6209, Section 2 for a complete listing
of MFTs. |
|
MICROFILM
SERIAL NUMBER (MSN)
|
A ten-digit
locator number printed across each FTD
and AOC processed through the Optical
Character Recognition (OCR) equipment as
each service center. The MSN is used to
identify and/or locate individual FTD
coupons. |
|
NON-MASTER
FILE |
The files
maintained by the IRS which include
transactions on tax accounts not
included on the Master File. |
|
NORMAL
(LEGAL) DUE DATE
|
The date the
statute requires the filing of the
return. If the normal or extended due
date falls on a Saturday, Sunday or
legal holiday, the return is considered
timely if it is filed on the next
succeeding day that is not a Saturday,
Sunday, or legal holiday. |
|
OFFER-IN-COMPROMISE
|
An agreement
resolving a taxpayer’s account where it
has been determined that there is either
doubt as to collectibility, doubt as to
liability, or both. |
|
ORAL EVIDENCE
|
Non-written
information received from the taxpayer,
authorized representative or other third
party, providing additional facts for
requesting penalty relief. See IRM
20.1.1 for additional information on
acceptable oral evidence. |
|
PENALTY
|
A sanction
primarily used to promote voluntary
compliance of the tax laws. |
|
PENALTY
COMPUTATION CODE (PCC)
|
A two-digit
code which is used to denote the reasons
why, or methods by which, a FTD penalty
was charged. |
|
PENALTY
PERIOD
|
The time for
which a penalty is applicable. |
|
PENDING
TRANSACTION
|
A
transaction entered into IDRS which has
not yet posted to the Master File.
Pending transactions will affect the
IDRS account balance, but will not
change the Master File account balance.
|
|
PERIOD ENDING
|
The ending
year and month of the period covered by
a tax return. |
|
PINEX
|
An IDRS
computer program used to produce penalty
and interest explanations for taxpayers. |
|
POSTASSESSMENT APPEAL
|
An appeal of
tax, penalty and/or interest made by the
taxpayer after the tax and/or penalty
has been assessed. |
|
PREPAID
CREDITS
|
Payments of
tax, such as withholding, estimated
payments, etc., made prior to the due
date of the return. |
|
PRESCRIBED
DUE DATE
|
The due date
designated for filing a return,
including any extension of time for
filing. |
|
PRESUMPTIVE
DUE DATE
|
The due date
designated for filing a return, not
taking into account any extensions. |
|
PROBLEM
RESOLUTION PROGRAM (TAS)
|
A program
within the IRS to which taxpayers’
problems can be referred if they cannot
be resolved by normal procedures. The
program cannot change the tax law or
technical decisions. |
|
REASON CODE
|
A two-digit
code used when adjusting an account to
denote which item on the tax return is
affected by the adjustment. |
|
REBATE
|
A credit,
refund or other repayment where too much
tax was paid. |
|
RECEIVED
DATE: |
|
|
a.
Timely filed
return
|
The original
or extended due date of the return. |
|
b.
Late filed
return
|
The IRS
received date stamped on the face of the
return. |
|
REFILE DLN
|
A new DLN
assigned to a return or other document
after an audit or tax adjustment has
been completed. The tax return and
related documents are filed under this
refile DLN. |
|
REFUND
|
Money
returned to the taxpayer as a result of
overpayment of a tax liability. |
|
REMITTANCE
AMOUNT
|
The amount
of money received in payment of a
liability. This remittance may be by
check, money order, cashier’s check, or
cash. |
|
SECURED
DELINQUENT RETURN
|
A return
secured after a taxpayer has been
contacted by the Service but prior to an
assessment made under Substitute for
Return procedures. |
|
SEIZED
PROPERTY
|
Property of
the taxpayer over which the Service has
exercised actual or constructive
dominion and control for purposed of
satisfying outstanding tax liabilities.
|
|
SERVICE
CENTER CONTROL FILE (SCCF)
|
A magnetic
tape control system record the receipt
of returns/documents, to trace their
progress through the processing system
and finally to verify that all items
have been completed. The SCCF systems
maintain separate totals for revenue
receipts and other items. |
|
SOCIAL
SECURITY NUMBER
|
A unique
nine-digit number used to identify an
individual taxpayer account, in
NNN-NN-NNNN format issued by the Social
Security Administration. |
|
SOURCE
DOCUMENT
|
Backup
documentation used by Service personnel
to explain an adjustment to a taxpayer’s
account; for example, taxpayer
correspondence. |
|
STATUS CODE
|
A two-digit
numeric code indicating the Master File
and/or IDRS status of a tax module. |
|
STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS
|
A set of
rules specifying the period in which
actions may occur, or within which
rights may be enforced. |
|
SUBSEQUENT
PAYMENT
|
A payment
received for an account that has been
assessed and for which the taxpayer has
been billed. |
|
SUBSTANTIAL
AUTHORITY
|
The
objective determination that a position
taken by a taxpayer is supportable. |
|
SUBSTITUTE
FOR RETURN (SFR)
|
A return
prepared on behalf of a taxpayer by the
Service pursuant to IRC section 6020(b).
The return is prepared when it has been
determined that a taxpayer is liable for
filing the tax return but has failed to
do so upon due notice from the Service.
|
|
SUPERSEDING
RETURN
|
An amended
return filed on or before the return due
date. It is filed on an original return
form, not an amended return form. |
|
TAX CLASS
|
A one-digit
code which identifies the type of tax
involved in a transaction. |
|
TAX MODULE
|
A record of
one account for one taxpayer covering
one type of tax for one tax period. |
|
TAX PERIOD
|
The period
of time for which a return is filed. |
|
TAXPAYER
DELINQUENT ACCOUNT (TDA)
|
An internal
computer notice indicating the taxpayer
has not responded to prior balance due
notices or paid a balance due. |
|
TAXPAYER
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (TIN)
|
A nine-digit
number assigned to taxpayers for
identification purposes. Depending on
the nature of the taxpayer, the TIN is
either an Employer Identification Number
(EIN), a Social Security Number (SSN),
or an Individual TIN. |
|
TAXPAYER
INFORMATION FILE (TIF)
|
The IDRS
file which contains entity and module
information. |
|
TIMELY FILED
|
A return or
document which was filed by the taxpayer
and received by the Service within
specified time frames. A return is
timely filed if postmarked by the
original or extended due date (Rev. Rul.
73-133). |
|
TOLERANCE
|
The
allowable deviation from standard in
order to facilitate administration of a
program. A tolerance can take the form
of a dollar amount or a time volumetric
allowance. |
|
TRANSACTION
CODE (TC)
|
Three-digit
code that identifies a specific action
on a taxpayer’s account. Document 6209,
ADP and IDRS Information, Section
20.1.1.8 contains a complete listing of
TCs. |
|
UNDERPAYMENT
|
In general,
the amount by which any tax imposed
exceeds the tax shown by the taxpayer on
the return, plus amounts previously
assessed (or collected without
assessment) before the return was filed
in excess of any rebate. |
|
VOLUNTARY
COMPLIANCE
|
Taxpayers
who freely obey the tax laws. Compliance
is defined in the IRC as: |
|
|
(a) filing
accurate and complete returns on time,
(b) paying amounts due, and
(c) reporting information required.
|
|
WAIVER
|
A waiver is
a limited form of penalty relief. |
|
WILLFUL
NEGLECT
|
Conscious,
intentional failure to comply with the
provisions of the IRC, or reckless
indifference to such provisions. |
20.1.2.1
(07-31-2001)
Overview
- This
section of the consolidated penalty IRM
discusses the Failure to File and
Failure to Pay penalties.
20.1.2.1.1 (07-31-2001)
Failure to File Tax Return or Pay
Tax
- The
Failure to File and Failure to Pay
Penalties covered in this chapter are:
-
IRC Section 6651(a)(1)
Failure to File Tax Return
-
IRC Section 6651(a)(2)
Failure to Pay Tax as shown on
return
-
IRC Section 6651(a)(3)
Failure to Pay Tax after Notice
and Demand for tax not shown on
return
-
IRC Section 6651(d)
Increase in the Penalty for
Failure to Pay in Certain Cases
-
IRC Section 6651(f)
Increase in the Penalty for
Fraudulent Failure to File
-
IRC Section 6651(h)
Failure to Pay Penalty Reduced
During Installment Agreement .
-
IRC Section 6698
Failure to File a Partnership
Return
20.1.2.1.2 (07-31-2001)
General Information
-
General applications:
-
IRC section 6651(a)(1): The FTF
penalty applies on the amount due
from the return due date (or
extended due date) until paid or
until the 25% maximum penalty is
applied. The FTF penalty rate is
5% a month. (See exception (2)a
below.)
-
IRC section 6651(a)(2): The FTP
penalty for failure to pay amounts
shown on the return as filed,
applies on the amount due from the
return due date to the date paid
at one-half of one percent (.005),
not to exceed 25%.
-
IRC section 6651(a)(3): The
penalty for failure to pay amounts
not shown on the return (e.g.,
audit deficiencies or other
subsequent adjustments) applies on
the amount due beginning after 21
calendar days from the notice and
demand for payment (23C date) to
the date paid at one-half of one
percent (.005), not to exceed 25%.
(Note: if the amount due equals or
exceeds $100,000, the FTP penalty
under IRC section 6651(a)(3)
starts 10 business days from the
23C date.)
-
Coordination between FTF and FTP
penalties:
-
When the FTF penalty under IRC
section 6651(a)(1) and the FTP
penalty for failure to pay tax
shown on the return under IRC
section 6651(a)(2)) both apply for
the same months, the FTF penalty
under IRC section6651(a)(1) is
reduced by the amount of the FTP
penalty under IRC section
6651(a)(2).
-
When the FTF penalty and the FTP
penalty for failure to pay tax not
showing on the return under IRC
section 6652(a)(3) both apply for
the same months, FTF is assessed
at 5% per month not to exceed 25%.
FTP applies at 1/2% per month not
to exceed 25%. (Note: FTP under
IRC section 6651(a)(3) applies to
subsequent assessments, e.g.,
audit deficiencies.) There is no
offset/reduction between FTF and
FTP under IRC section 6651(a)(3).
-
Transactions affecting the FTF/FTP
penalty calculation:
-
Amended returns: Accepted amended
returns (TC 977) that decrease the
tax on return, modify the net
amount due and require a
recalculation of the penalty from
the same start date used for the
original calculation. Additional
tax on an amended return requires
an increase to the FTF penalty
from the start date used for the
original calculation. No
adjustment to FTP under IRC
section 6651(a)(2) is required.
-
Refund offsets: A refund offset
(TC 706/826) is treated as a
payment by the taxpayer from
another module and reduces the net
amount due for subsequent penalty
calculations
-
Carrybacks/carryovers: The FTF/FTP
penalty calculation is based on
the amount due before the tax
liability is decreased by
carryback or carryover losses or
credits, e.g., net operating
losses, investment credits,
foreign tax credits. Carryback or
carryover losses or credits to the
module on which the FTF/FTP
penalty is running do not reduce
the net amount due for penalty
calculation purposes.
20.1.2.1.2.1 (07-31-2001)
Extension of Time to File
- IRC
section 6081 and the related
regulations provide for a reasonable
extension of time to file a return.
The "reasonable extension " is not
to exceed 6 months (unless the
taxpayer is abroad). If the taxpayer
has a valid extension of time for
filing a return, the taxpayer is not
liable for the FTF penalty for the
duration of the extension period.
The computation of the FTF penalty
begins immediately after the
extended due date.
- An
extension of time to file is not an
extension of time to pay. However,
if the taxpayer --
-
has a valid extension of time to
file,
-
has paid 90% of the tax due by
the return due date,
-
files the return by the extended
due date, and
-
pays remaining amounts due in
full with the return
the
Service will assume the taxpayer
satisfies the reasonable cause
exception to the FTP penalty and it
will not be assessed. Absent any one
of the above four factors, the FTP
penalty is assessed from the
original return due date. This
provision does not apply to the
additional two month extension
requested on Form 2688. (See Notice
93-22.)
- If a
timely-filed request for an
extension of time to file is denied
and the taxpayer files the return
within 10 days from the date of the
Service’s denial, no FTF penalty
will be assessed.
- The
Service may void a previously
granted automatic extension where
the taxpayer’s Form 4868 or 7004 is
invalid.
-
Individuals are granted the
automatic four month extension of
time to file if the following
conditions are satisfied (Treas.
Regs. 1.6081–1 and 1.6081–4):
-
The individual must have
completed Form 4868, Application
for Automatic Extension of Time
to File U.S. Individual Income
Tax Return,
-
filed the application on or
before the due date of the
return, and
-
properly estimated the tax due.
-
An additional two month
extension may be requested by
completing Form 2688,
Application for Additional
Extension of Time to File U.S.
Individual Income Tax Return.
-
The automatic extension can be
requested by telephone
(taxpayers should retain the
confirmation number.) The
extension request can also be
e-filed from tax preparation
software or through a tax return
preparer.
-
Individuals outside the United
States are granted an automatic
two-month extension (until June 15,
for calendar year taxpayers) to file
a return and pay any federal income
tax due if the individuals are U.S.
citizens or residents and on the
regular due date of the return:
-
Live outside the United States
and Puerto Rico, and their main
place of business or post of
duty is outside the United
States and Puerto Rico, or
-
Are in the military or naval
service on duty outside the
United States and Puerto Rico.
-
To use this automatic two-month
extension, the individual must
attach a statement to their
return explaining which
situation (1 or 2 above)
qualifies them for the
extension.
-
If a joint return is filed, only
one spouse has to qualify for
this automatic extension. If
separate returns are filed, the
automatic extension applies only
to the spouse who qualifies.
-
Service in a Combat Zone IRC Section
7508): The time for filing a return
or paying a tax should be
automatically extended for 180 days
after the period an individual:
-
Serves (or supports) the Armed
Forces of the United States in
an area designated as a "combat
zone" by the president of the
United States, or
-
Is hospitalized as a result of
an injury received in an area
designated as a combat zone.
-
Partnership (Treas. Regs. 1.6081–2):
-
A partnership, required to file
Form 1065, is granted an
automatic three month extension
of time to file when properly
completing a Form 8736,
Application for Automatic
Extension of Time to File U.S.
Return for a Partnership, REMIC,
or for Certain Trusts.
-
The request must be filed with
the Service on or before the
original due date of the return.
The request must be signed by a
general partner or other person
authorized to file the
application.
-
The extension of time to file
the Form 1065 does not extend
the time to make the required
payment under IRC Section 7519,
Required Payments for Entities
Electing Not to Have Required
Taxable Year, or file a
partner’s income tax return, or
pay a partner’s income tax.
-
Corporations are granted an
automatic six month extension of
time to file when they :
-
properly complete Form 7004,
Application for Automatic
Extension of Time to File U.S.
Corporation Income Tax Return
and file it before the original
return due date,
-
properly estimate and pay the
tax before the return due date,
and
-
have the properly authorized
person sign the form (see Treas.
Regs. 1-6062-1. )
The
FTP penalty will be administratively
waived under reasonable cause
criteria if the above requirements
are satisfied, 90% of the tax has
been paid by the return due date and
the remaining amount is paid by the
extended due date.
-
TE/GE Blanket extensions or filing
exceptions have been granted to
certain exempt organizations under
Rev. Rul. 71–236, 1971–1 C.B. 398,
Rev. Proc. 83–23, 1983–1 C.B. 687,
as supplemented by Rev. Proc. 94–17,
1994–1 C.B. 579 and Rev. Proc.
86–23, 1986–1 C.B. 564. See IRM
20.1.8 for TE/GE penalties.
20.1.2.1.2.2 (07-31-2001)
Unsigned Returns
- See
current procedures in Commissioner's
Directives and Chief Counsel's
Directives.
20.1.2.1.2.3 (07-31-2001)
Received Date
- A
return is considered timely if
received prior to, or on, the due
date or extended due date of the
return. If the due date falls on a
Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday,
and the return is filed by the next
business day, consider it filed on
the due date.
- U.S.
Postal Service: Consider a return
timely-filed if postmarked by the
U.S. Postal Service (or designated
delivery service) by the original or
extended due date. See LEM 20.1.2.4.
-
A return is late if the postmark
date is after the prescribed due
date.
-
When more than one United States
Postal Service postmark date
appears on an envelope, consider
the earlier postmark date as the
date the return was mailed.
-
Registered and Certified Mail: The
date of registration for registered
mail is treated as the postmark
date. The postmark date on certified
mail is treated as the postmark
date.
-
Privately Metered Mail: In general,
consider a return timely filed if it
contains a postal meter stamp that:
-
bears the date on or before the
last date (or last day of the
period) prescribed for filing
the return, and
-
the return is received not later
than the time the return would
normally have been received if
it had been mailed on the last
date (or last day of the period)
prescribed for filing the
return.
- If
the return is received after the
normal time, and the postmark is not
made by the U.S. postal service, the
taxpayer must prove the factors in
Treas. Reg.
301.7502–1(c)(1)(iii)(B).
-
The document must show a
postmarked date that is on or
before the last day of the
period prescribed for filing the
document.
-
The document must be received by
the Service not later than the
time the document would have
been received if it were
postmarked at the same point of
origin by the United States Post
Office.
-
In addition, the person who is
required to file the document
must show: the document was
deposited before the last
collection of the mail (from the
place of deposit) on or before
the last day prescribed for
filing the document, any delay
in receiving the document was
due to a delay in the
transmission of the mail.
- Date
Stamp: The Service date stamps the
received date on returns filed after
the original due date. Returns filed
by the original due date carry the
due date as the received date and
are not date stamped when received.
The received date for a late-filed
return is the date a return reaches
any IRS office or service center.
- A TC
610 may show the received date on
the transcript. IDRS shows the
received date under the posted
return information section as
RET–RECD–DT.
20.1.2.1.2.4 (07-31-2001)
Definition of Month
- For
FTF/FTP penalty purposes, a month is
calculated from the date the penalty
period begins to the same date in
each following month, or part of a
month. Both penalties continue to
apply monthly until the maximum
period is reached or (for FTF) the
return is filed or (for FTP) the tax
is paid. For example:
-
The return due date is April 15,
1997. The return is received
July 17, 1999 with tax due of
$1,700 paid in full. FTF and FTP
both apply for four months.
-
The return extended due date is
August 15, 1998. The return is
received December 21, 1998
showing tax on return of $2,000,
withholding of $800, and amount
due of $1,200 paid in full with
return. FTF applies for five
months from August 15, 1998. FTP
(under IRC section 6651(a)(2))
applies for nine months from
April 15, 1998.
- For
any return or payment due date that
begins on the last date of a month,
the following examples apply:
-
Return or payment due date
January 31; first month ends
February 28; second month ends
March 31; third month ends April
30.
-
Return or payment due date
falling on the 30th of any
month; all subsequent months end
on the 30th except February
which ends on the 28th or the
29th.
- If a
return is not timely filed or the
tax is not timely paid, the fact
that the date prescribed for filing
the return or paying the tax, or the
corresponding date in any succeeding
calendar month, falls on a Saturday,
Sunday, or a legal holiday is
immaterial in determining the number
of months for the FTF/FTP penalty.
Treas. Reg. 301.6651–1(b)(3).
20.1.2.1.2.5 (07-31-2001)
Net Amount Due
- For
the FTF penalty under IRC section
6651(a)(1), the net tax amount is
the amount of tax required to be
shown on the return less allowable
credits. This amount is reduced by
payments made on or before the
prescribed due date of the return
(excluding extensions), such as
withholding credits, tax deposits,
estimated tax payments, overpayments
from prior periods, or other
payments.
- The
failure to file penalty applies not
only to tax shown on a taxpayer’s
original return, but also to any
additional tax later found due on
the return.
- The
net tax amount required to be shown
on the return includes all income
taxes as well as employment taxes.
For example, the uncollected
employee FICA tax on tips is a tax
required to be shown on Form 1040,
Individual Tax Return; thus, this
uncollected FICA tax on tips should
be included in the net tax amount.
-
Certain taxes may be paid in
installments, e.g., heavy vehicle
use tax (Form 2290) and estate taxes
(Form 706).
-
If the taxpayer elects to pay
this type tax in installments,
the FTP penalty does not apply.
- When
computing the net tax amount from
the return due date for the FTF
penalty, do not consider amounts
which were paid after the due date
of the return, but before the date
of filing. For example:
-
Taxpayer sends in payment of
$700 for TY 1998 Form 1040 on
May 27, 1999 before he files the
return
-
Taxpayer files return August 27,
1999 and pays remaining amount
due of $200.
-
Tax on return, $1,200;
withholding, $300; balance due
as of return due date, $900.
-
FTP is calculated on $900 for
two months at 1/2% a month = $9.
Plus, FTP is calculated on $200
for three months at 1/2% a month
= $3. Total FTP penalty = $12
-
FTF penalty is calculated on
$900 for five months at 4.5% a
month = $202.50.
20.1.2.1.3 (07-31-2001)
Penalty Relief
- IRM
20.1.1.3, provides guidance for
determining if the taxpayer meets the
criteria that will allow relief from a
penalty. See Exhibit 20.1.1–3 of IRM
20.1.1 for a complete list of penalty
reason codes.
- The
Service will abate the FTF/FTP penalty
when the taxpayer shows reasonable
cause and not willful neglect for the
failure to file a return or pay a tax
as required. In some instances the
abatement will only apply to the
portion of the penalty for the period
the taxpayer meets relief criteria.
-
Reasonable cause determinations
MUST be made on the individual
facts and circumstances of each
case.
-
Generally, the taxpayer must pay
the tax due before the Service
will abate a FTP penalty for
reasonable cause. The penalty
continues to accrue until the tax
is paid. The taxpayer may have
reasonable cause for some months,
but not for others. A correct
determination cannot be made until
after the tax is paid. An
exception to this rule is allowed
for accounts in which the FTP
penalty has reached the 25%
maximum before the taxpayer's
request for abatement.
-
Contacted personnel should address the
reason for the failure to file or pay
penalty when securing or examining
returns on which the penalty applies.
Making this initial determination will
prevent the need for subsequent
abatements. Enter Reason Code (RC) 62
in any of the first three reason code
fields for adjustments involving
requests for reasonable cause
consideration, and the applicable
penalty reason code (PRC) in the
fourth reason code field.
- When
the FTF/FTP penalties are abated for
reasonable cause using TC 271 with RC
62, Master File will not restrict
future computer computations of FTP
penalty (provided it was not
previously restricted). The computer
continues to compute the FTP penalty
but will waive the amount associated
with RC 62.
- A
TC 271 input without RC 62
restricts subsequent computation
of the penalty.
-
Input TC 272 with a zero amount to
remove the manual restriction on
failure to pay penalty, when you
determine that a module was
restricted in error.
-
See LEM 20.1.2.
20.1.2.1.4 (07-31-2001)
Substitute for Return IRC section
6651(g)
-
Pursuant to IRC section 6020(b) a
substitute for return (SFR) is
prepared by the Service when it is
determined that a taxpayer is liable
for filing the tax return but failed
to do so after receiving notification
from the Service.
- If a
taxpayer fails to file a delinquent
return when requested under the SFR
program and the statutory notice of
deficiency defaults, or the taxpayer
executes an agreement to waive the
restrictions on assessment of a
deficiency (by signing a Form 870,
4549E or 4549), the Service will
assess the FTF/FTP penalty.
Note:
Excise and employment tax returns do
not follow statutory notice of
deficiency procedures.
- The
FTP penalty on amounts shown on SFRs
for returns due after July 30, 1996
(determined without regard to
extensions) is calculated from the
return due date under IRC section
6651(a)(2). For returns due before
July 31, 1996, FTP begins 21 calender
days (10 business days if the amount
on the notice is $100,000 or more)
after the 23C date (TC 290 or 300)
under IRC section 6651(a)(3).
- When
the FTP and the FTF penalties apply
for the same months, the FTF penalty
is calculated from the return due date
at four and one half percent (.045) a
month for each month it is late, not
to exceed five months. For any month
in which the FTP and the FTF penalties
do not both apply, the FTF penalty
rate is 5%.
- If the
taxpayer has an extension of time to
file (TC 460), the FTF penalty begins
on the extended due date whether or
not the taxpayer filed by the extended
due date.
- Note:
under IRC section 6651(d) the FTP
penalty on an SFR increases from
one-half of one percent (.005) to 1%
after notice of intent to levy (CP
504) is issued. TC 971 with AC 69 or
35 also indicates that the 1% rate has
been triggered.
- If the
taxpayer files his own return (the due
date for which, without regard to
extensions, is after July 30, 1996)
after the 1% FTP penalty rate has
taken effect on the SFR assessment,
the FTP penalty under IRC section
6651(a)(2) is recalculated on the
amount showing due on the taxpayer's
return by using the .5% rate for the
same period the .5% rate was in effect
on the SFR and the 1% rate for the
same period the 1% rate was in effect
on the SFR, not to exceed 25% in the
aggregate.
- The
FTP penalty is automatically
calculated and assessed from the due
date of the return until the date the
tax is paid. To allow automatic
generation of the FTP by master file,
input an adjustment to tax (or 290/300
for a zero amount) with a (1) Priority
code 2 (ADJ54/TC290), or (2) Priority
code 9 (ADJ47/TC300).
20.1.2.1.5 (07-31-2001)
Excise Tax
- The
filing and paying of an excise tax
covering the tax on one of the
categories (Abstract Numbers/IRS No.s)
listed on Form 720, Quarterly Federal
Excise Tax Return, does not constitute
the filing of a return or paying a tax
for any of the other categories
(Abstract Numbers).
-
Example: A manufacturer of bows and
arrows and fishing rods files a timely
return for the tax on bows and arrows
only. Do not consider this return as
being a timely-filed return for the
tax on fishing rods.
20.1.2.1.6 (07-31-2001)
Restrictions on Assertions
-
According to Policy Statement P–2–4,
the Service does not assert penalties
against federal agencies.
- The
general statute of limitations for
assessing the penalty on a filed
return is three years from either the
due date or the date filed, whichever
is later. There is no statute of
limitations for assessing the penalty
where no return has been filed.
20.1.2.1.6.1 (07-31-2001)
Taxpayer in Bankruptcy
- IRC
section 6658 prohibits the assertion
of the FTP penalty while a taxpayer
is involved in a title 11 bankruptcy
proceeding if:
-
The tax was incurred by an
estate and the failure to pay
occurred pursuant to an order of
the court finding probable
insufficiency of funds of the
estate to pay administrative
expenses, or
-
The tax was incurred by the
debtor before the order of
relief or the appointment of a
trustee in an involuntary case,
whichever is earlier and
-
the petition was filed
before the return due date,
including extensions, or
-
the date for making the
addition to the tax occurs
on or after the day on which
the petition was filed.
- In
the case of a tax assessed before
the start of a proceeding:
-
no FTP penalty will be asserted
for the period during which the
bankruptcy case is pending,
-
the FTP penalty will stop
accruing at the start of the
bankruptcy proceeding and
-
it will resume after the
bankruptcy is resolved and
continue until the tax is paid
or the 25 percent maximum
penalty is reached.
20.1.2.1.7 (07-31-2001)
Assessment/Abatement Procedures
-
Delinquent returns. Examiners securing
delinquent returns will solicit any
explanation the taxpayer may provide
on the FTF/FTP penalty determination.
When adjusting the tax on a return
that was filed late, determine if the
FTF/FTP penalty was previously
assessed or abated, and consider any
factors that would apply to these
penalties on a proposed tax
adjustment. When the audit of a
delinquent return results in an
overpayment (refund), the FTF penalty
and the FTP penalty under IRC section
6651(a)(2) initially assessed by the
service center are recalculated and
reduced.
-
Example 1: Taxpayer filed 1997
Form 1040 on 7-18-98 (four months
late) showing a refund of $500.
The return is audited 6-20-99, and
a tax deficiency of $1,200 is
agreed. FTF penalty applies at 5%
a month for four months from the
return due date on $1,200. The FTP
penalty would first apply at
one-half of one percent a month
under IRC section 6651(a)(3) on
any amounts unpaid after 21 days
from assessment (the 23C date)
-
Example 2: Taxpayer filed 1997
Form 1040 on 7-18-98 (four months
late) paying $1,400 amount due in
full with return. FTF and FTP were
assessed. The return is audited in
June, 1999 and results in an
overpayment (refund) of $900. FTF
penalty is recalculated on $500
($1,400 original underpayment less
$900 overpayment from audit) at
4.5% a month for four months from
the return due date. The FTP
penalty is also recalculated based
on $500 for four months at .5% a
month.
-
After 1/1/02 AC 262 for TC 971
will generate when the maximum FTP
penalty has been assessed. When
the account drops from IDRS AC 262
will be visible on CFOL for both
IMF and BMF. When figuring FTP
manually, AC 262 can be input
manually.
-
Carrybacks and carryovers:
-
The examiner will not adjust the
penalty for that part of the tax
liability which is decreased
because of a carryback or carry
over, such as a net operating
loss, an investment credit, a
foreign tax credit or a capital
loss (for corporations).
- In
the case of a carryback or
carryover, the FTF penalty is
adjusted by reference to the
potential tax liability (either a
deficiency or an overassessment)
which is computed prior to
application of the carryback or
carryover.
-
For example: The 1998 F-1120 was
due March 15, 1999 but was filed
four months late with amount due
of $7,000 paid in full on June 27,
1999. FTF and FTP were assessed.
An NOL of $12,000 from TY 1999 was
carried back to TY 1998. No
adjustments to the FTF/FTP penalty
apply even though the carryback
reduces the tax per return to
zero.
-
For example: The 1998 F-1120 was
due March 15, 1999 but filed four
months late and was subject to an
NOL carryback of $20,000 from TY
1999. Tax per return of $50,000
less the carryback of $20,000
leaves adjusted taxable income of
$30,000. The taxpayer subsequently
agrees to an audit deficiency of
$27,000. FTP begins on $27,000 21
days after notice and demand for
payment.
20.1.2.1.7.1 (07-31-2001)
Service Center/Customer Service
-
Manual Computation of the Penalty:
-
In many instances, Master File
calculates the FTP penalty (TC
276).
-
When manual adjustments of the
penalty are required, Service
personnel are responsible for
determining the correct penalty
amount.
-
IDRS Command Code (CC) INTST is
available for determining the
amount of assessed and accrued
FTP penalty on accounts not
previously restricted (TC
270/271).
-
IDRS CC COMPAF is available for
computing the FTP penalty which
should be assessed or abated.
The COMPAF print may be used to
document a manual adjustment.
-
When there is a difference
between computer generated and
manual computations, manual
computations take precedence.
- The
following transaction codes identify
assessment or abatement of the FTF
and FTP penalties:
-
TC 166/167—computer generated
assessment/abatement of the FTF
penalty.
-
TC 160/161—manual
assessment/manual abatement of
the FTF penalty.
-
TC 162—manual removal of
computation restriction of the
FTF penalty.
-
TC 276/277—computer generated
assessment/abatement of the FTP
penalty.
-
TC 270/271—manually
assessment/abatement of the FTP
penalty.
-
Blocking Series. When making a FTF
and/or FTP adjustment:
-
with the original return, use a
refile blocking series;
-
without the original return, use
any nonrefile blocking series as
appropriate.
-
Priority Codes. To remove a prior
restriction and allow automatic
generation of the FTP penalty by
master file, input an adjustment to
tax (or 290/300 for a zero amount)
with a priority code 2
(ADJ54/TC290), or priority code 9
(ADJ47/TC300).
-
Manual assessments /abatements:
Since the FTP penalty accrues until
the earlier of the date the tax is
paid or the maximum penalty is
assessed, it is important that
employees do not unnecessarily
restrict the module.
-
System errors: Prompt action is
needed to correct FTF/FTP penalties
erroneously assessed or accrued due
to system errors. When a system
error is discovered, the Service
issues special instructions
identifying the problem and the
steps needed to correct the
situation. Usually, these system
errors are quickly resolved. When a
system error on an individual case
is identified, such as a tax account
suspended in notice status longer
than it should have been, an
adjustment to assessed and accrued
FTP penalty may be needed.
-
Before adjusting restricted FTF/FTP
assessments, the original assessment
documents may be obtained to check
the penalty computation and
rationale for restricting the
penalty.
-
Assessed and accrued FTP
penalties should be manually
computed (CC COMPAF may be used)
and abated from the cycle of the
last status update through the
23C date of the posting TC 271.
-
Notify the taxpayer of the
action taken and the balance
due, if any.
20.1.2.1.7.2 (07-31-2001)
PINEX
- The
IRS provides explanations of all
penalty and interest charges to the
taxpayer when a balance due notice
or a refund is issued. Using the
Penalty and Interest Notice
Explanation (PINEX) system.
- Upon
request, command code PINEX
generates a notice of explanation to
the taxpayer. The specific tax
module requested must be on the TIF
data base and at least one
unreversed penalty or interest
transaction posted.
- This
notice includes a computation and
explanation of selected computer
generated penalties, interest
charged and interest paid except for
computations and explanations of
failure to deposit penalty.
-
PINEX notices must be reviewed by
the tax examiner requesting the
notice, and, if correct, mailed to
the taxpayer.
-
PINEX also provides screen displays
of penalty and interest computations
for an immediate response to
telephone inquiries or walk-in
requests made to Area Offices. IRS
personnel may find the screen
displays helpful in analyzing
penalty and interest transactions in
general.
20.1.2.1.8 (07-31-2001)
FTF/FTP on Withholding and EIC
- When
an adjustment is made to a taxpayer's
withholding credit or estimated
payments, the FTP penalty applies only
when the allowable amount is less than
the original tax due. For example:
- A
taxpayer's return has tax of
$1,000, withholding of $1,800, and
was refunded $800.
- If
the withholding of $1,800 is
reduced to $1,100 (TC 807 for
$700), the FTP penalty is not
asserted because the remaining
allowable withholding ($1,100)
still exceeds (or, is enough to
cover) the tax of $1,000.
- If
the withholding of $1,800 is
reduced to $600, the FTP penalty
is asserted on $400, because the
allowable withholding ($600) does
not exceed (or, is not enough to
cover) the original tax due of
$1,000.
Note:
Note:
any FTP penalty on adjustments to
withholding and estimated tax
payments is always calculated from
return due date under IRC section
6651(a)(2) even when the adjustment
is part of a subsequent assessment,
e.g., an audit determination.
- When a
pre-refund adjustment is made to a
taxpayer's Earned Income Credit (EIC),
the FTP penalty applies when the
allowable EIC is less than the
original tax due. For example:
- A
taxpayer's return has tax of
$2,000, withholding of $1,800 and
EIC of $800.
-
The refund of $600 is frozen
pending EIC verification
- If
the EIC of $800 is fully
disallowed, the taxpayer has an
amount due of $200. The FTP
penalty applies under IRC section
6651(a)(3) on $200 from 21 days
after the notice and demand for
payment until full paid or until
the maximum 25% is reached.
- If
$500 of the $800 EIC is
disallowed, the taxpayer's $600
refund is reduced to $100, and no
FTP penalty applies
-
Note: the same factors apply to
the FTP penalty on EIC pre-refund
or in-process adjustments due to
the recertification requirement
(or the two or ten year
prohibition) on EIC under IRC
section 32(k).
- When
an adjustment is made to a taxpayer's
EIC after return processing, the
amount of the EIC reduction (TC 765)
is subject to the FTP penalty under
IRC section 6651(a)(3) from 21 days
after the notice and demand for
payment until full paid or until the
maximum 25% is reached. In the
following example FTF also applies:
-
The taxpayer's return, due April
15, 1998, was filed on August 2,
1998 with tax of $2,000, EIC of
$800, and withholding of $1,800.
The $600 refund is issued.
-
The return is subsequently
audited, the EIC of $800 is
disallowed and a deficiency
assessed on June 22, 1999. The
amount is full paid on November
27, 1999.
-
The taxpayer is assessed FTF from
return due date at 5% a month
times four months times $800 =
$160.
-
The taxpayer is assessed FTP under
IRC section 6651(a)(3) beginning
on July 14, 1999 at 1/2% a month
times five months times $800 =
$20.
20.1.2.2
(07-31-2001)
Minimum Failure to File
- The
minimum failure to file (MFTF) penalty
applies to delinquent individual,
corporate, trust and estate tax returns
when
- the
tax return is more than 60 days past
due, and
- the
regular FTF penalty is less than the
lesser of $100 or 100% of the tax on
the return.
- Example
one: Taxpayer files 1997 F-1040 three
months late on June 20, 1998 and pays
the full amount due of $600 with the
return. The FTF penalty is calculated at
four and one-half percent a month, times
three months, times $600 = $81. The MFTF
penalty applies because the FTF penalty
of $81 is less than the lesser of $100
or the amount showing due on the return
($600). The MFTF penalty is therefore
$100.
- Example
two: Same as above only the taxpayer
files five months late on August 20,
1998. The FTF penalty is calculated at
four and one-half percent a month, times
five months, times $600 = $135. The MFTF
penalty does not apply because $135 is
not less than the lesser of $100 or the
amount showing due on the return ($600).
20.1.2.3
(07-31-2001)
Failure to File a Tax Return IRC
section 6651(a)(1)
- IRC
section 6651(a)(1) imposes a penalty for
failure to file a tax return by the date
prescribed (including extensions),
unless it is shown that the failure is
due to reasonable cause and not due to
willful neglect. See IRM 20.1.1.3 for a
discussion of penalty relief.
-
Penalties for failure to file
information returns, such as Forms 1099
or 5500, are discussed in Chapters
20.1.7, Information Return Penalties and
20.1.8, TE/GE Penalties.
20.1.2.3.1 (07-31-2001)
Penalty Computation
-
Determine the FTF penalty period.
-
The penalty period extends from
the return due date (or extended
due date) for each month or part
of a month the return is late, not
to exceed five months.
-
The FTF penalty does not apply
during the period covered by a
valid extension of time to file
(Forms 4868, 2688, 7004, 2758, and
8736). TCs 460 and 620 identify
extensions.
-
Determine the FTF penalty rate.
-
Generally, the FTF penalty is 5%
of the net amount due per month
(or part of a month) not to exceed
five months.
-
When the FTF penalty and the FTP
penalty under IRC section
6651(a)(2) apply at the same time,
the FTF penalty is reduced by the
amount of the FTP penalty under
IRC section 6651(a)(2). In other
words, FTF is then assessed at a
rate of 4.5% a month and FTP at
.5% a month. When both FTF and FTP
apply for 5 months, the maximum
FTF penalty rate is 22.5%.
-
The FTF penalty is only reduced by
the 1/2% FTP penalty under IRC
section 6651(a)(2)--regarding
unpaid amounts shown due on the
return. The 1/2% FTP penalty under
IRC section 6651(a)(3)--regarding
unpaid amounts subsequently
assessed, e.g., TCs 290 and
300--does not reduce the FTF
penalty.
-
When a delinquent return is later
assessed an additional tax (e.g.,
TC 290/300), the FTF penalty is
calculated from the RDD (or
extended due date) on the
additional amount at 5% a month
for each month the return was
originally past due. This includes
underpayment amended returns.
-
When a delinquent return has the
original tax reduced (e.g., TC
291/301), the FTF penalty is
re-calculated from the RDD (or
extended due date) on the reduced
amount of tax using the rate
originally applied.
-
Multiply the net amount due (see IRM
20.1.2.1.2.5) times the number of
months the return is past due times
the applicable monthly rate. This
figure is not to exceed 25% of the net
amount due.
-
Example FTF penalty calculations:
- An
individual taxpayer files the 1997
return on June 19, 1998 with a tax
liability of $700 paid in full
with the return. Since the FTF and
the 1/2% FTP penalty under IRC
6651(a)(2) apply at the same time,
the 5% FTF penalty is reduced to
four and one half percent (.045).
The FTF penalty rate of .045 a
month, times three months, times
$700 = $94.50.
-
The same taxpayer is subsequently
audited and a deficiency of $1,200
is assessed on February 19, 1999.
The FTF penalty applies at a rate
of 5% a month, times three months,
times $1,200 = $180. This amount
is in addition to any prior FTF
penalty that was previously
imposed. (Note: The FTF penalty is
not reduced by the FTP penalty
under IRC section 6651(a)(3),
which is applicable to
deficiencies.)
- A
1998 return is filed four months
late on July 21, 1999 claiming a
$400 refund. The return is
subsequently audited and a
deficiency of $700 is assessed.
Since the $700 is, per IRC section
6651(a)(1), "an amount required to
be shown as tax" on the return,
the FTF penalty is calculated by
multiplying 5% per month, times
four months, times $700 = $140.
(Note: for FTF purposes, the
amount subject to the penalty,
i.e., $700, is not offset by the
$400 refund on the return as
filed.)
20.1.2.4
(07-31-2001)
Failure to Pay Tax IRC section
6651(a)(2)
- IRC
section 6651(a)(2) imposes a FTP penalty
if the tax shown on any return is not
paid by the due date of that return.
This penalty applies to the following
returns:
-
Income tax returns;
-
Employment tax returns;
-
Excise tax returns;
- Gift
tax returns;
-
Estate tax returns;
- It does
not
apply to:
-
Information returns required under
Chapter 61, Subchapter A, Part III;
-
Payments of estimated tax;
-
Partnership returns.
- The
Service does not assert this penalty
when the failure to pay is due to
reasonable cause and not willful neglect
or the taxpayer qualifies under other
penalty relief criteria. See IRM
20.1.1.3 for a complete discussion of
penalty relief.
20.1.2.4.1 (07-31-2001)
Penalty Computation
-
Determine the penalty period. The
penalty period for the FTP penalty
under IRC section 6651(a)(2) is the
number of months (including a part of
a month) from the return due date--not
including extensions--until the tax is
paid. (See IRM 20.1.2.1.2.4 for the
definition of a month.)
- The
penalty rate is one-half of one
percent per month (or part of a month)
on the net amount due until the tax is
paid in full or the maximum 25% is
reached. (See IRM 20.1.2.6 for FTP
rate increase to 1%. See IRM 20.1.2.8
for FTP rate decrease to one quarter
of one percent.)
-
Determine the net amount due. (See IRM
20.1.2.1.2.5.)
-
Multiply the number of months
(including a part of a month) the tax
remains unpaid, times the penalty
rate, times the net amount due.
-
Examples:
-
The 1999 return is filed on June
17, 2000 with the amount due of
$5,200 paid in full with the
return. The FTP penalty under IRC
section 6651(a)(2) applies from
RDD (April 15, 2000) for three
months at one-half of one percent
per month on $5,200. One-half of
one percent (.005) per month,
times three months, times $5,200
equals the FTP penalty of $78.
-
The 1998 return (due April 15,
1999) is filed October 28, 1999
with $7,000 due. Two thousand
($2,000) is paid with the return.
The remaining $5,000 is paid on
May 3, 2000. FTP penalty applies
to $7,000 from RDD at .005 a month
for seven months = $245. Plus: FTP
penalty on $5,000 from November
15, 1999 at .005 a month for six
months = $150.
20.1.2.5
(07-31-2001)
Failure to Pay Tax IRC section
6651(a)(3)
- IRC
section 6651(a)(3) imposes a FTP penalty
on any tax required to be reported on a
return, other than information returns,
that was not reported on the return. The
FTP penalty under IRC 6651(a)(3) relates
to amounts subsequently assessed
(usually TCs 290 and 300), unlike the
FTP penalty under IRC section 6651(a)(2)
that relates to unpaid amounts showing
due on the return as originally filed.
- The FTF
penalty is not reduced by the FTP
penalty imposed under IRC section
6651(a)(3). See IRC section 6651(c)(1).
- The
FTF penalty is computed from the
original due date of the return for
up to five months.
- The
FTP penalty imposed under IRC
section 6651(a)(3) begins 21
calendar days from the date of
notice and demand (10 business days
if the amount owed equals or exceeds
$100,000) and continues until the
additional tax is paid, not to
exceed 25 percent of the tax.
-
Therefore, the FTF and FTP penalties
may be assessed on the same amount
of unpaid tax, but for different
periods of time.
20.1.2.5.1 (07-31-2001)
Penalty Computation
-
Determine the penalty period:
-
Determine the number of months
(including a part of a month) from
the date that is 21 calendar days
after notice and demand for
payment (10 business days if the
balance due equals or exceeds
$100,000).
-
The penalty applies until the tax
is paid in full or the maximum 25%
is reached.
-
For first balance due notices (CP
501s) issued after December 31,
1996, the FTP penalty under IRC
section 6651(a)(3) begins 21
calendar days (or 10 business days
if the balance due equals or
exceeds $100,000) after assessment
(23C date). For notices first
issued before January 1, 1997, the
FTP penalty began 10 days after
assessment.
- The
penalty rate is one-half of one
percent (.005) per month for each
month or part of a month the tax is
unpaid, not to exceed 25%.
-
Determine the net amount due. For any
month in which a partial payment is
made, the net amount due is
proportionately reduced for the FTP
calculation on the following month.
See IRM 20.1.2.1.2.5.
-
Multiply the number of months
(including a part of a month) the tax
remains unpaid, times the penalty
rate, times the net amount due.
- The
following examples illustrate the FTP
penalty under IRC section 6651(a)(3):
-
Example 1: Taxpayer timely filed
1999 return with a refund.
Taxpayer was audited and assessed
a deficiency (TC 300) of $2,500 on
February 5, 2001. Full payment is
received April 30, 2001. FTP
penalty is calculated at 1/2%
(.005) a month beginning after 21
days from assessment, i.e., from
the start date of February 27,
2001: $2,500 x .005 x 3 months =
$37.50.
-
Example 2: Taxpayer filed 1999
return four months late on July
19, 2000 with $3,000 balance due
paid in full. (FTF at .045 a month
x 4 months x $3,000 = $540 plus
FTP at .005 a month x 4 months x
$3,000 = $60. Both penalties are
assessed and paid.) Taxpayer is
later audited and a deficiency (TC
300) of $4,500 is assessed on
January 4, 2001. Taxpayer pays in
full five months later on June 7,
2001. FTF applies from RDD at 5%
(.05) a month x 4 months x $4,500
= $900. FTP applies from January
26, 2001 at 1/2%
a month x 5 months x $4,500 =
$112.50.
-
Example 3: Taxpayer filed 1999
return five months late on August
19, 2000 with unpaid balance due
of $6,000. The maximum FTF of
$1,350 applies: 41/2%
a month x 5 months x $6,000 =
$1,350. FTP under IRC section
6651(a)(2) continues running at
1/2% a month
from RDD on $6,000. The 1% rate
under IRC section 6651(d) is
triggered on December 4, 2000.
Taxpayer receives a CP 2000 notice
showing additional tax due of
$1,200 on unreported interest
income. Taxpayer does not respond
and $1,200 is assessed (TC 290) on
March 6, 2001. FTP under IRC
section 6651(a)(3) first applies
on March 28, 2001 at 1% a month on
$1,200. The March 28, 2001 start
date is determined by IRC section
6651(a)(3). The 1% rate is decided
by IRC section 6651(d) because the
1% FTP penalty rate was already
running on the unpaid balance
originally due from the RDD.
20.1.2.6
(07-31-2001)
Increase in the FTP IRC Section
6651(d)
- IRC
section 6651(d) increases the FTP
penalty rate under IRC section
6651(a)(2) or (3) from one-half of one
percent (.005) to one percent (.01) of
the tax at the start of the month
beginning after:
- 10
days after the date of notice of
intent to levy (IRC section
6331(d)), or
- The
day on which notice and demand for
immediate payment is given in the
case of jeopardy (IRC section
6631(a)).
-
These are the only two
conditions—trigger dates—that allow
for the FTP penalty rate increase to
one percent.
- See IRM
20.1.2.6.1 for information on how to
identify the notice of intent to levy.
- The 1%
penalty rate applies to all subsequent
assessments on that module. However,
once a module is fully paid, a later
assessment will begin to accrue at the
one-half of one percent rate. This later
assessment will also be subject to the
above trigger dates for the 1% rate.
- The
increased rate does not change the
monthly period for accruing the penalty.
20.1.2.6.1 (07-31-2001)
Penalty Computation
-
Determine the penalty period under IRC
section 6651(d):
-
The 1% FTP rate begins on the
month beginning after (1) the 10th
day after the notice of intent to
levy, or (2) the day notice and
demand for immediate payment is
given on a jeopardy assessment.
-
The CP 504 is a notice of intent
to levy for IRC section 6651(d)
purposes. Master File Notice
Status 58 provides the same
indication. If a Collection
employee requested the issuance of
either ACS Letter 11 or DO Letter
1058, the Master File indication
would be provided by TC 971 with
Action Code 35 or 69.
-
Determine the penalty rate. The
penalty is assessed at 1% (.01) per
month or part of a month on the amount
due until the tax is paid or the
maximum 25% penalty amount is reached.
- The
net amount due under IRC section
6651(d) that is subject to the 1%
penalty rate is the net amount showing
on the notice of intent to levy unless
that amount was reduced by a payment
received after the notice was issued
and before the beginning of the month
starting 10 days after the notice. See
IRM 20.1.2.1.5.
-
Multiply the number of months in the
penalty period for the IRC section
6651(d) FTP penalty (including a part
of a month), times 1%, times the
applicable amount due.
Note:
the
preceding FTP calculation at
one-half of one percent (or one
quarter of one percent if an
installment agreement had been in
effect) will be added to this to
establish when the maximum 25% has
been reached.
-
Example: A FTP penalty (under IRC
section 6651(a)(2) or (a)(3)) which is
accruing on the16th day of the month
at the one-half of one percent rate
will first accrue at the 1% rate on
the 16th day of the month following 10
days after the trigger date (or on the
16th day of the month following one
day after the trigger date in the case
of jeopardy). It will then continue to
accrue at 1% until paid or until the
25% maximum FTP penalty is reached.
For example:
-
Taxpayer filed 1998 F-1040 timely
with unpaid amount due.
-
FTP under IRC section 6651(a)(2)
applied at one-half percent per
month beginning on April 16, 1999
and on the 16th of each following
month.
- CP
504 is issued October 11, 1999.
-
From October 11, 1999 add 10 days
to get October 21, 1999.
-
From October 21, 1999 go to the
beginning of the next monthly
period established under IRC
section 6651(a)(2), i.e., November
16, 1999.
-
The 1% FTP rate first applies on
November 16, 1999.
20.1.2.7
(07-31-2001)
Fraudulent Failure to File IRC section
6651(f)
- The
fraudulent failure to file (FFTF)
penalty under IRC section 6651(f)
increases the FTF penalty under IRC
section 6651(a) from 5% a month to 15% a
month, from a maximum 25% to 75%. FFTF
is assessed with TC 240 using RN 686.
- The FFTF
penalty is a counterpart of the civil
fraud penalty under IRC section 6663 and
should be investigated and asserted in
the same manner.
- The
burden of proof is on the government
to establish FFTF.
- The
fraud components of the FFTF and the
fraud penalties are generally
similar. The civil fraud penalty
requires an underpayment which is
attributable to the willful and
knowing intent to defraud. The FFTF
penalty requires a "net amount due"
. The intent element of the fraud
and the FFTF penalties should be
interpreted the same.
- The
FFTF penalty is asserted on a
case-by-case basis after considering
all the facts and circumstances
surrounding the failure to file.
There must be clear and convincing
evidence that the failure to file
was done with the intent to evade
taxes.
- The
following factors should be considered
when developing a FFTF case:
- The
taxpayer refuses to, or is unable
to, explain the failure to file;
- The
taxpayer’s statement does not meet
or agree with the facts of the case;
-
There is a history of failing to
file or late filing, but an apparent
ability to pay;
- The
taxpayer fails to reveal or tries to
conceal assets;
- The
taxpayer pays personal and business
expenses in cash when cash payments
are not usual, or cashes rather than
deposits checks which are business
receipts; and
- The
taxpayer is aware of the filing
requirement. This factor should not
be used as the sole factor for
asserting the penalty. Rather it
should be used in conjunction with
one of the above factors.
- The 75
percent fraud (under IRC section 6663)
and FFTF penalties may be asserted for
the same tax year. There is no statutory
prohibition against asserting penalties
under both IRC sections 6651(f) and
6663. See IRM 20.1.5.7.2 for a
discussion of civil fraud under IRC
section 6663.
- The
examining officer determines the amount
of the FFTF penalty and reflects it on
the audit report. If the taxpayer does
not agree with the assertion of the FFTF
penalty, the examiner should prepare an
unagreed report. The report should
include the FTF penalty as an
alternative position, in the event that
the FFTF penalty is not sustained upon
appeal.
20.1.2.7.1 (07-31-2001)
Penalty Computation
- The
FFTF penalty is 15% a month on the
amount due for each month (or part of
a month) the return is late. The
penalty begins from the RDD (or
extended due date) to the date filed
or the maximum five months is reached,
whichever comes first.
- Note:
when the FTP penalty under IRC section
6651(a)(2) applies during any month
for which the FFTF also applies, the
15% FFTF rate is reduced to fourteen
and one half percent (.145) per month.
- The
FFTF penalty is assessed with TC 240,
Reference Number 686.
20.1.2.8
(07-31-2001)
Reduced Penalty IRC Section 6651(h)
- For
months beginning after December 31,
1999, an individual's FTP penalty will
be reduced to one quarter of one percent
(.0025) for any month in which an
installment payment agreement with IRS
is in effect, provided the individual
timely filed (taking extensions into
account) the return relating to the
liability that is subject to the
installment agreement.
- This
reduction does not apply if the 1% FTP
penalty rate under IRC Section 6651(d)
is in effect.
- This
reduction applies to all of an
individual's tax liabilities including
liability arising on Forms 940, 941, and
945 (relating to subtitle C on
employment tax).
- This
reduction does not apply to tax
liabilities of non-individuals.
- Status
60 and TC 971/AC 063 indicate an
installment agreement is in effect and
the FTP penalty rate applies at 1/4%.
When the taxpayer misses a scheduled
payment (TC 971/AC 064), a CP 523 is
issued to notify the taxpayer of intent
to levy. However, the CP 523 does not
trigger the 1% FTP penalty rate. Only
when the account goes into Status 22 (TC
971/AC 163) to indicate the installment
agreement is terminated, will the 1%
rate become effective on the beginning
of the month following ten days after
the CP 504 is issued. This condition is
present as Status 58 (TC 971/AC 069 or
035). If the taxpayer's installment
agreement is re-instated after the 1%
has gone into effect, the 1% rate stays
in effect and does not revert back to
1/4%. Beginning in cycle 200001, TC
971/AC 069 is generated or input when
notice status 58 was bypassed and either
ACS Letter 11 or DO Letter 1058 was
sent.
20.1.2.9
(07-31-2001)
Failure to File Partnership Return IRC
section 6698
- IRC
section 6698 imposes a penalty against a
partnership that fails to file a timely
or complete return as required by IRC
section 6031.
- The
penalty is imposed on those
partnerships that fail to file a
timely or complete partnership
return (Form 1065).
- The
penalty also applies to those U.S.
Real Estate Mortgage Investment
Conduit (REMIC) that fail to file a
timely or complete REMIC Income Tax
Return (Form 1066).
- Although
the penalty is assessed against the
taxpayer (partnership or REMIC), the
partners or investors are held
individually liable for the penalty to
the extent of their liability for debts
of the taxpayer.
20.1.2.9.1 (07-31-2001)
Assertion Criteria
-
Generally, this penalty is imposed on
a partnership which did not timely
file or provide the information
required on Form 1065 or 1066. The
penalty will not be imposed if the
partnership can show that failure to
file a complete or timely return is
due to reasonable cause.
20.1.2.9.2 (07-31-2001)
Penalty Computation
- The
penalty period for the failure to file
a Form 1065 or 1066 (or the failure to
file a complete return with all the
information required under IRC section
6031) applies from the return due date
for each month (or part of a month) up
to a maximum of five months.
Note:
If
the taxpayer provides the required
information before the end of the
five month period, the penalty
applies to the month in which the
required information was provided,
but not beyond.
- The
penalty is calculated at a rate of $50
for each partner for each month (or
part of a month) the return is late or
incomplete, not to exceed five months.
A person is a partner for penalty
calculation purposes if the person was
a partner for any portion of the year,
20.1.2.9.3 (07-31-2001)
How to Assert/Assess
- ) The
late filing penalty is assessed
manually with a TC 160 or systemically
with TC 166. The penalty for missing
information is systemically assessed
with TC 246 and manually with TC 240.
20.1.2.9.4 (07-31-2001)
Penalty Relief
- If the
taxpayer provides information that
will allow penalty relief for failure
to file a complete or timely return,
abate the penalty. See IRM 20.1.1.3
for a discussion of penalty relief.
- If it
can be demonstrated that the taxpayer
is not required to file a particular
schedule for which the penalty was
charged, abate the penalty.
- Rev.
Proc. 84-35 defines conditions for
abatement of the FTF penalty for
partnerships with less than 10
partners. A partner can be--
-
Individuals (excluding nonresident
aliens),
- C
corporations, or
-
Estates of deceased partners.
- If the
penalty is assessed for incomplete
return information, abate the penalty
if the partnership submits the
information within 30 days of the
request to do so, or within 30 days
following the second notice
- IRC
section 6032 Common Trust Fund Filers.
IRC section 6032 requires banks
maintaining a common trust fund to
file annual information returns by the
period ending three months and 15 days
after the end of the fiscal year (or
April 15th for calendar year filers).
No particular form is prescribed for
making this return, but if Form 1065
is used, it should reflect all items
of gross income and deductions of the
fund, and identify all participants
and their proportionate share. See LEM
20.1.2.
20.1.3.1
(07-31-2001)
Overview
- This
Section of the Penalty IRM 20.1
discusses the estimated tax penalties
for both individual (Internal Revenue
Code (IRC) section 6654) and corporate
(IRC section 6655) taxpayers.
20.1.3.1.1 (02-01-2003)
Individual (& Fiduciary) Estimated
Tax Penalty (IRC Section 6654)
- IRC
section 6654 provides for a penalty
when individuals, estates and most
trusts underpay any required
installment(s) of estimated income tax
liabilities reportable on Forms 1040
(U.S. Individual Income Tax Return)
and Forms 1041 (U.S. Fiduciary Income
Tax Return).
- For
taxable years beginning January 1,
1998, taxpayers are not subject to
estimated tax penalties if the tax
shown on their return (or, if no
return is filed, their tax liability),
minus tax amounts withheld from wages
during the year, is less than $1,000.
Prior to January 1, 1998, the
threshold was $500.
20.1.3.2
(08-20-1998)
Assertion Criteria
-
Taxpayers make quarterly estimated tax
payments to pay for income tax
liabilities not paid through
withholding.
-
Taxpayers must make estimated tax
payments if the tax shown on their
return (or, if no return is filed, their
tax liability), minus withholding from
wages during the year, will be $1,000 or
more ($500 for tax years beginning
before January 1, 1998) unless an
exception in IRM 20.1.3.2.1 applies.
-
Taxpayers who underpay estimated tax may
be subject to a penalty.
- To avoid
the estimated tax penalty under IRC
section 6654, the annual estimated tax
(including withholding) required to be
paid is the lesser of: (a) 90 percent of
the tax shown on the current year's
return; (b) if no return is filed, then
90 percent of the tax required to be
shown on the current year's return, or
(c) an amount equal to the appropriate
percentage of the tax shown on the
preceding year's return (if a return was
filed, and if the preceding year was a
full year), as follows:
- For
estimated tax installments due after
December 31, 1997, taxpayers with
adjusted gross income equal to or
less than $150,000 ($75,000 if
married filing separately), must pay
100 percent of last year's tax.
Taxpayers with adjusted gross income
above that threshold must pay the
following percentage of the
preceding year's tax:
- For
tax years beginning after December
31, 1993, and before January 1,
1998, taxpayers with adjusted gross
income equal to or less than
$150,000 ($75,000 if married filing
separately), must pay 100 percent of
the preceding year's tax. Taxpayers
with adjusted gross income above
that threshold, must pay 110 percent
of the preceding year's tax.
- For
tax years beginning after December
31, 1991, and before January 1, 1994
(estimated tax payments due in 1992
and 1993), special rules apply for
taxpayers meeting the conditions set
forth in IRM 20.1.3.2.1.1.
- For
tax years beginning after December
31, 1987, and through December 31,
1991, taxpayers must pay 100 percent
of the tax shown on the preceding
year's return (without adjustments,
if any are on the module).
|
If
current tax year is: |
Preceding tax year begins in: |
Applicable Percentage is: |
|
1998
|
1997 |
100 |
|
1999
|
1998 |
105 |
|
2000
|
1999 |
108.6 |
|
2001
|
2000
|
110
|
|
2002
|
2001
|
112
|
|
2003
and later |
2002 |
110 |
20.1.3.2.1 (08-20-1998)
Determining the Required Annual
Payment
- No
estimated tax penalty will be imposed
if the tax shown on the taxpayers'
return minus tax amounts withheld from
wages during the year is less than
$1,000 ($500 for years beginning
before January 1, 1998).
- No
estimated tax penalty will be imposed
on taxpayers if for any tax year:
-
They had NO
liability for tax for the
preceding tax year, and
-
They were a citizen or resident of
the United States throughout the
preceding tax year, and
-
The preceding tax year was a
12-month year.
- The
exception in (2) above is available
for individuals, estates, and trusts
even if the prior year return shows a
liability for tax.
- Master
File usually can determine whether the
taxpayer qualifies for this exception.
The computer will assess the penalty
if the taxpayer incorrectly claims
this exception.
20.1.3.2.1.1 (02-01-2003)
Payments Based on Prior Year's Tax
-
Generally, taxpayers may base their
annual estimated tax amounts on 100
percent of the preceding year's tax.
For this method of computing
estimated tax to apply, the
preceding tax year must have covered
a full 12 months. (Beginning January
1, 1992, certain taxpayers may not
be able to use this option. See (2)
below.) For tax years beginning
after December 31, 1997, the
percentage of the preceding year's
tax changed. See IRM 20.1.3.2.
-
The preceding year's tax for
purposes of estimated tax
payments refers to the tax
assessed with the original or
amended returns.
-
The preceding year's tax does
not include tax increases or
decreases from amended returns
or audits
after
the return due date
(including extensions). See,
however, the exceptions to this
rule in IRM 20.1.3.2.7.
-
Section 403 of P. L. 102–164,
Emergency Unemployment Compensation
Act of 1991, limited the use of the
100 percent of the preceding year's
tax as a safe harbor for the current
year's estimated taxes. See LEM
20.1.3.2.1.1.2. The law covers tax
years beginning after December 31,
1991, and is not applicable to tax
years beginning after December 31,
1993. Taxpayers (other than farmers
and fishers) meeting
ALL
of the following conditions
cannot
use 100 percent of the preceding
year's tax as the basis for their
estimated tax installments due in
1992 and 1993:
-
Adjusted gross income for the
current year exceeds $75,000
($37,500 in the case of a
married individual filing a
separate return), and
-
The "modified adjusted gross
income" for the current year
exceeds the amount of the
adjusted gross income shown on
the return of the preceding tax
year by more than $40,000
($20,000 in the case of a
married individual filing a
separate return) {see Exhibit
20.1.3–3 for explanation of
"modified adjusted gross income"
},
and
-
Taxpayers made estimated tax
payments (other than by
application of withholding or
credit from the prior year's
return) during any of the
preceding three years, or
taxpayers had a penalty assessed
for failure to pay estimated tax
during the preceding three
years,
and
-
90 percent of the current year's
"modified expected tax " will be
greater than 100 percent of the
preceding year's tax.
-
If 90 percent of 1992's or
1993's "modified expected tax "
is greater than 100 percent of
the preceding year's tax, then
the required annual payment for
1992 or 1993 is the
smaller of 90 percent
of the current year's tax or 90
percent of the year's "modified
expected tax" , unless the
taxpayer uses the annualized
income installment method. See
Exhibit 20.1.3–3 for a
definition of "modified expected
tax."
-
Under these rules, the first
installment of 1992's or 1993's
estimated tax may be based on
100 percent of the preceding
year's tax. However, if the
penalty is to be avoided, the
difference between the first
installment payment and the
portion of the required annual
payment that otherwise would
have been due, must be added to
the next installment payment.
- For
tax years beginning after December
31, 1993, the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act (OBRA) of 1993
changed the estimated tax
installment rules of high income
taxpayers. Application of the new
safe harbor depends on the filing
status of the taxpayer for the
current year, and the adjusted gross
income (AGI) for the preceding year.
-
To qualify for the prior year
safe harbor, individuals with
adjusted gross income for the
previous tax year in excess of
$150,000 ($75,000 for married
individuals filing separately)
must pay 110 percent of the tax
shown on the preceding year's
return.
-
In the case of an estate or
trust, adjusted gross income
will be determined as provided
in IRC section 67(e) (relating
to the 2 percent floor for
miscellaneous itemized
deductions).
- The
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 changed
these prior year safe harbors. See
IRM 20.1.3.2 for the new percentages
for each year.
20.1.3.2.1.2 (08-20-1998)
Non-resident Aliens and U.S.
Citizens Residing or Living Abroad
-
Non-resident aliens (other than
those whose U.S. wages are subject
to withholding) are required to make
three installments of estimated tax.
In the case of a calendar year
individual, the installment
requirements are:
|
Due Dates: |
Prior to 1/1/86 |
After 12/31/85 |
|
1 June 15 |
33 1/3
percent |
50 percent |
|
2 Sept 15 |
33 1/3
percent |
25 percent |
|
3 Jan 15 of the following
year |
33 1/3
percent |
25 percent |
-
Prior to Section 12314 of Public Law
103–66, Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1993 (OBRA
'93), nonresident aliens' limitation
on the use of the prior years
liability as a safe harbor did not
apply. For taxable years beginning
after December 31, 1993, nonresident
aliens are subject to the same
limitations as in IRM 20.1.3.2.1.1,
Payments Based on Prior Year's Tax.
20.1.3.2.1.3 (08-20-1998)
Deceased Taxpayers
-
Deceased taxpayers are liable for
estimated tax payments due on
installment due dates occurring
prior to the date of death. The
penalty is computed on underpaid
installments from their due date to
the
earlier of the date paid
or the date of death.
20.1.3.2.1.4 (02-01-2003)
Fiduciaries of Estates and Trusts
- The
Tax Reform Act of 1986, effective
for tax years beginning after
December 31, 1986, provided that all
estates and most trusts are required
to make estimated tax payments in
the same manner as individuals.
NOTE
EXCEPTION:
Charitable trusts and any private
foundation organized as a trust,
will be subject to the corporate
estimated tax provisions under IRC
section 6655, rather than IRC
section 6654.
- The
following are exempt from paying
estimated tax for tax years ending
before two years from the date of
death:
-
Decedents' estates,
-
Grantor trusts that receive the
residual of a probate estate
under the decedent's will, and
-
For tax years beginning after
December 31, 1986, if there is
no will to probate, a trust that
is primarily responsible for
paying taxes, debts and expenses
of administration.
-
Fiduciaries may elect to treat any
portion of estimated tax payments
made by the trust or estate as
payments made by a beneficiary. Such
an amount is treated as a payment of
the estimated tax made by the
beneficiary on January 15 of the
year following the taxable year.
Fiduciaries must make these
elections on Form 1041–T,
Transmittal of Estimated Taxes
Credited to Beneficiaries. These
elections
MUST be filed on or
before the 65th day after the close
of the trust's tax year. [IRC
section 643(g)]
-
Generally, a qualified funeral trust
(QFT) must pay estimated income tax
if it expects to owe, after
subtracting withholding and credits,
at least $1,000 in tax. Estimated
tax liability is figured for the
individual QFT, and not for a
composite return taken as a whole.
For details and exception, see Form
1041–ES, Estimated Income Tax for
Estates and Trusts. Use Form 2210,
Underpayment of Estimated Tax by
Individuals, Estates, and Trusts, to
figure any penalty.
20.1.3.2.1.5 (02-01-2003)
Annualized Income Installment
Method
-
Taxpayers who do not receive income
evenly throughout the year (for
example, taxpayers involved in
seasonal businesses) may use the
annualized installment income method
for determining estimated tax
payments. This method allows
estimated payments that actually
reflect the income earned in the
period immediately before the
installment due date. Form 2210
includes Schedule A1 which is used
to determine the required
installments using the annualized
income installment method.
-
Annualized income installment is
computed by placing on an annualized
basis the income for months in the
taxable year ending on the last day
of the month before the due date for
the installment. This means the
income will be annualized from the
first of
January for each
installment period. For example:
|
|
Installment Due |
Income Annualized From |
Through
|
|
1 |
4/15 |
1/01 |
3/31 |
|
2 |
6/15 |
1/01 |
5/31 |
|
3 |
9/15 |
1/01 |
8/31 |
|
4 |
1/15 |
1/01 |
12/31 |
-
Estates and trusts electing to use
the annualized income installment
method have the same estimated tax
payment due dates as other
individuals. However, the
installment is computed by placing
on an annualized basis the income
for months in the taxable year
ending before the date
one month
before the due date for the
installment. This means that income
is annualized as follows:
|
|
Installment Due |
Income Annualized From |
Through
|
|
1 |
4/15 |
1/01 |
2/28 |
|
2 |
6/15 |
1/01 |
4/30 |
|
3 |
9/15 |
1/01 |
7/31 |
|
4 |
1/15 |
1/01 |
11/31 |
- If
the annualized income installment
method is used for one installment,
and the regular method is used for
the next installment, any reduced
amount realized under the annualized
installment versus the regular
method installment, must be made up
in the following regular method
installment. (The annualized
worksheet included in the
"Instructions for Form 2210"
package, as well as Schedule A1,
Form 2210, recaptures any
shortfall.)
-
For tax years 1992
and later,
taxpayers must complete Schedule A1
of Form 2210 and attach the Form
2210 to their return.
-
For tax years 1987
through 1991,
taxpayers
MUST attach a
worksheet and Form 2210 to their
return.
-
For tax years prior
to 1987,
taxpayers were not required to
attach a worksheet to Form 2210. If
working those periods, do not
request Forms 2210 or worksheets. If
the taxpayer claimed installment
amounts that are not equal, assume
the taxpayer annualized.
- For
service center personnel working
penalty cases, if the taxpayer's
calculation is incorrect do the
following:
-
Prepare a letter explaining
error(s) in the taxpayer's
calculations, and
-
Adjust the penalty based on your
computation.
-
Estimated tax penalties based on the
Annualized Income Installment Method
must be computed manually.
20.1.3.2.1.6 (02-01-2003)
Farmers and Fishers
-
Taxpayers with at least two-thirds
of their gross income derived from
farming or fishing, (see
Publications 225, Farmer's Tax
Guide, and 595, Tax Guide for
Commercial Fishermen, for defining
gross income) in the current or
preceding tax year (see Exhibits
20.1.3–4 and 20.1.3–5) are required
to either:
-
Make a lump sum estimated tax
payment by the 15th day of the
month following the close of the
tax year (January 15 for
calendar year returns) or
-
File their return and pay the
total tax due by the first day
of the third month following the
close of the tax year (March 1
for calendar year returns).
-
See LEM 20.1.3.2.1.6.1.
- The
required annual payment is the
smaller of:
-
66 2/3
percent of the current year's
tax, or
-
100 percent of the total tax
shown on the preceding year's
return (assuming the return
covered all 12 months).
- For
joint returns, the spouse's income
must be considered in determining if
the taxpayer meets the two-thirds
gross income from farming or fishing
requirement.
- If a
taxpayer qualifies as a
farmer/fisher, an indicator is
placed on the Taxpayer Information
File (TIF). The indicator will
thereafter appear on IDRS screens
for CC TXMOD, CC PIEST, CC ACTRA, CC
MFTRA, CC IMFOL, RTVUE and/or other
transcripts as they are developed.
20.1.3.2.2 (08-20-1998)
Period of Underpayment
-
Taxpayers are generally required to
pay 25 percent of their annual
required payment on or before each
installment payment due date (see
Exhibit 20.1.3–2).
- The
underpayment period is determined by
the number of days from the
installment payment due date to
either:
-
The date on which the underpayment
is paid (see LEM 20.1.3.2.2), or
-
The 15th day of the 4th month
following the close of the taxable
year (due date of return without
regard to extensions), whichever
is earlier.
- Each
underpaid installment period must be
separately computed.
20.1.3.2.3 (02-01-2003)
Payment Due Dates
- Most
taxpayers make estimated tax payments
in four installments. For calendar
year returns, the due dates are:
|
a. |
1st installment |
April 15th |
|
b. |
2nd installment |
June 15th |
|
c. |
3rd installment |
September 15th |
|
d. |
4th installment |
January 15th of the following
year |
- For
fiscal year returns, the installment
due dates are the 15th day of the
fourth, sixth, and ninth months of the
tax year with the fourth installment
due on the 15th day of the first month
following the close of the fiscal
year. See Exhibit 20.1.3–1.
- If an
installment due date falls on a
Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday,
payments received the next business
day are considered paid on the due
date.
(NOTE:
Throughout this text the term
"payments received" equates to
payments made in accordance with IRC
section 7502 regarding the "timely
mailing, timely filing" rule.)
- To
calculate the number of days see the
Perpetual and the Leap Year Julian
Date Calendars.
-
Taxpayers do not have to make the
fourth installment payment if they
file their return and pay the tax due
on or before the last day of the 1st
month following the end of the tax
year (for calendar year taxpayers,
this would be January 31). See IRC
section 6654(h).
20.1.3.2.4 (02-01-2003)
Application of Estimated Tax
Payments, Credits and Withholding
-
Credits claimed on Forms 2210,
Underpayment of Estimated Tax by
Individuals, Estates, and Trusts, or
2210F, Underpayment of Estimated Tax
by Farmers and Fishermen, must be
verified against the taxpayer's
account record. This can be done by
checking the appropriate CFOL, IDRS
(i.e. CC TXMOD), or MRS transcripts.
Review both the payment dollar amounts
and the received dates on the
taxpayer's record. Consider only
payment amounts credited to the
taxpayer's account on or before
installment payment due dates.
- See
LEM 20.1.3.2.4.
20.1.3.2.4.1 (08-20-1998)
Credits Applied Within The Tax
Year
- For
periods beginning after December 31,
1984, installment payments are
applied against the earliest
underpayment within a tax period,
regardless of the date the payment
was received. When the first
installment is satisfied, any excess
will be applied to the next
installment until all liabilities
within a given tax period are
satisfied.
20.1.3.2.4.2 (08-20-1998)
Credits From a Prior Year
- TC
716 or 710 (overpayment arising on
or before the due date of the prior
year's return) are applied against
the first required installment of
the next year's estimated tax unless
the taxpayer notifies the Service by
means of a statement attached to his
income tax return, that the
overpayment should be applied to
another installment.
20.1.3.2.4.3 (08-20-1998)
Withholding
-
Withholding is divided evenly among
the four installments, unless the
taxpayer notifies the Service to
apply the withholding to the
installment in which it was actually
withheld. If the withholding is to
be treated as paid when it was
actually withheld, the taxpayer must
complete and attach Form 2210 to the
return.
20.1.3.2.4.4 (08-20-1998)
Additional Payment Information
- If
the taxpayer claims IRS did not
properly credit the account, review
the canceled check, bank data, or
other information the taxpayer
provides about the payment(s).
Determine if the payment(s) in
question posted correctly to the
account.
- If
the payment has not posted to the
account, follow functional
procedures for tracing payments. If
the payment posted after the penalty
assessment and the penalty was
manually assessed (TC 170),
recompute the penalty using the
latest payment information.
- If
there is a change in the taxpayer's
withholding taxes allowable as a
credit under IRC section 31 and/or
the estimated tax payments, the
penalty
MUST
be corrected even though
the affected taxpayer does not
request the correction.
- If
the penalty was manually computed or
there is otherwise a restricting
condition in the module, manually
recompute the penalty using the new
credit/payment amounts. The computer
will automatically recompute
estimated tax penalty when an
adjustment to TC 806 or TC 807 is
made and there are no restrictive
conditions, such as TC 170/171, in
the module, or when TC 43X, 61X,
62X, 66X, 67X, 700, 702, 71X, 760,
762, or 97X posts prior to the
return due date, also assuming there
are no restrictive conditions in the
module.
- If
the taxpayer claims that he elected
to apply a prior year's overpayment
to the current year's estimated tax,
but the overpayment was refunded in
error, request a copy of the prior
year return from the taxpayer. If
the taxpayer's statement is
verified, the taxpayer may be
entitled to have a portion of the
penalty abated. Also, if the
taxpayer made an estimated tax
payment that was erroneously
refunded by the Service, they may be
entitled to have the penalty or a
portion thereof abated. See IRM
20.1.3.4.1.7.
20.1.3.2.4.5 (08-20-1998)
Verifying Credits on Master File
-
Credits claimed by the taxpayer
should be verified. This can be done
by checking the appropriate CFOL,
IDRS (i.e. TXMOD,), or MRS
transcripts. Review both the dollar
amounts and the received dates of
any payments.
- TC
800 or TC 806 credits a tax module
for the amount of withholding taxes
claimed on a Form 1041.
- TC
710 or TC 716 credit is a "credit
elect" overpayment received from the
prior tax period. It will be applied
as a credit to the first required
installment period unless the
taxpayer instructs the Service to
apply it to another installment.
- TC
660 deposits are made using an 8109
or 8109–B deposit coupon. This
deposit will post to the tax module
with the date the payment was
received at the Federal Depositary.
- TC
670 subsequent payments will be
credited to a tax period with the
received date of that payment.
- TC
610 is a payment that is received
with the return. This payment will
also post to the tax module with the
date the payment was received.
20.1.3.2.5 (08-20-1998)
Determining Amount of Underpayment
- The
amount of the underpayment is the
required installment payment minus the
amount (if any) paid or credited on or
before the due date of the
installment.
20.1.3.2.6 (02-01-2003)
Penalty Rate
-
Although the estimated tax penalty is
not interest, it is computed in the
same manner as interest, except it is
NOT
COMPOUNDED DAILY
. Use the debit interest rate
in effect for the appropriate time
period.
- In
accordance with IRC section 6621,
the debit interest rate is
determined quarterly. This means
that the penalty on a $1000
underpayment for one quarterly tax
period may be different from the
penalty on a $1000 underpayment
for a different quarterly tax
period.
-
Interest rates can be found in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin (IRB),
News Releases, TAX NEWS,
Servicewide Electronic Research
Program (SERP) and Notice 433,
Interest and Penalty Information.
-
RATE EXCEPTION UNDER
IRC SECTION 6621(b)(2)(B):
The rate which applies during the
third month following the taxable year
also applies for the first 15 days of
the fourth month. For example, for tax
year ending December 31, 2001, the
debit interest rate in effect during
the first quarter of 2002 will be used
for the period April 1 through 15,
regardless of interest rate determined
for the second quarter of 2002.
20.1.3.2.7 (08-20-1998)
Determining the Penalty Amount
- For
each installment, the penalty is
determined by multiplying:
-
The penalty rate
(is the same as the underpayment
(debit interest) rate established
under IRC section 6621. That rate
is a simple interest rate that is
NOT
compounded daily).
-
By the amount of
the underpayment,
-
For the period of
underpayment.
(The period of underpayment begins
on the due date of the installment
and ends with the earlier of
payment received date or due date
of the return without regard to
extensions, usually April 15th of
the following year.
NOTE:
THIS IS A PENALTY and cannot be
claimed as a deduction or business
expense on any return.)
- See
LEM 20.1.3.2.7.
-
Estimated tax penalties are computed
on the amount of tax reported on the
original return.
- If an
adjustment
is made to the tax of an original
return, including extensions, as a
result of the taxpayer filing a second
return, the penalty amount may be
adjusted, based on the new tax amount.
A a second
return filed on or before the due date
of the return) is
considered an original return.
- If an
adjustment
is made to the tax of an original
return,
after the
return due date ,
including extensions, as a result of
either an audit or the taxpayer filing
an amended return, the penalty amount
will generally (see the following
exceptions) not be adjusted.
- If
an amended joint return is filed
after separate returns (i.e. an
individual files joint return
after filing a separate return for
a taxable year in which they could
have filed a joint return), the
estimated tax penalty is based on
the joint return. This is the
case, even if it is filed after
the time for filing the return
(including extensions), as long as
a joint return is filed before the
expiration of the statute of
limitations. For additional
information refer to IRM
21.6.7.4.7, "Interest and Penalty
Considerations. "
- If
there is a math error on the
return, the computer is programmed
to compute the penalty on the
lesser amount of tax as computed
by the taxpayer or corrected by
IRS.
Example: The original
return shows the taxpayer computed
the tax to be $1,300. Due to a
math error, the tax was corrected
to $1,800. The estimated tax
penalty would be computed on the
lesser amount of tax, $1,300.
-
Revenue Agents, Revenue Officers, and
Tax Examiners with access to IDRS may
use command codes:
-
COMPAE/COMPAS to facilitate the
computation of the estimated tax
penalty.
-
PINEX (PIEST) to explain a
computer generated estimated tax
penalty computation to the
taxpayer. Once the penalty has
been restricted (either with TC
170/171 or a computer condition
code) PINEX is no longer able to
explain the penalty computation.
-
For restrictions to Master File
see LEM 20.1.3.2.7.6.
-
Specific instructions regarding
the input of both the COMPA and
PINEX command codes are contained
in the Aims Handbook, IDRS
Terminal Inquiries and, IDRS
Terminal Input.
20.1.3.2.7.1 (02-01-2003)
Form 2210 or 2210F
-
Taxpayers use Forms 2210,
Underpayment of Estimated Tax by
Individuals Estate, and Trusts, and
2210F, Underpayment of Estimated Tax
by Farmers and Fishermen, to:
-
Determine if they are liable for
an estimated tax penalty on Form
1040 or Form 1041 returns
(except private foundations and
charitable trusts), and compute
the penalty, if they wish to
"self-assess," or allow IRS to
compute the penalty;
-
Use the annualized income
installment method;
-
Claim an exception to or waiver
of the penalty;
-
Treat income tax withheld from
wages as paid when actually
withheld, rather than in four
equal amounts; or
-
Use 100 percent of the preceding
year's tax for 1992 and 1993
returns, if the adjusted gross
income for the current year
exceeds the adjusted gross
income for the prior year by
more than $40,000, but the
modified adjusted gross income
for the current year does
NOT
exceed the adjusted
gross income for the prior years
by more than $40,000.
-
Service employees use Forms 2210 and
2210F as worksheets when manually
computing the penalty.
-
Revenue Procedure 83–79, 1983–2 C.B.
597, allows taxpayer's to use either
the tax table or the tax rate
schedule, whichever is more
advantageous, when using exceptions
2, 3, and 4 on Form 2210 or
exception 2 on Form 2210F.
- To
determine if an estimated tax
penalty is applicable where one or
more of the required installments
are based on the prior year's tax
and the taxpayer filed or is filing
a joint return for either the prior
year or current year, but not for
both years, one should do the
following:
-
If the taxpayer filed the prior
year return as married filing
separately, combine the two tax
amounts. Ask the question, for
the current year, did the
taxpayer make estimated tax
payments equaling at least 100
percent (or the applicable
percentage if income is over
$150,000) of the combined prior
year tax liability? If no,
compute the penalty.
-
If the taxpayer filed a joint
prior year return, separate the
liabilities appropriate to each
spouse. Compute the tax both
spouses would each have paid had
they filed separate returns for
the prior year using the same
filing status as they are using
for the current year. Ask the
question, for the current year,
did the taxpayer make estimated
tax payments equaling at least
100 percent of the separated
prior year tax liability. If no,
compute the penalty.
20.1.3.2.7.2 (08-20-1998)
Substitute For Return
-
Estimated tax penalties in the
Substitute for Return program (SFR)
are assessed as if no return was
filed. Usual processing of SFRs
includes issuance of a statutory
notice of deficiency after the
return due date (including
extensions). If no response is
received to the statutory notice of
deficiency, the assessment is made,
including estimated tax penalty as
appropriate.
- Many
taxpayers file amended returns after
the SFR is processed. The Service is
under no legal or regulatory
obligation to abate previously
assessed taxes or penalties where
documentation was not timely
submitted and the taxpayer received
legal notification from the Service.
-
The taxpayer's only legal
recourse in these situations is
to pay the tax and file a claim
under IRC section 6404.
-
This avenue in many cases would
not best serve the mission of
the Service, which is to collect
the proper amount of tax at the
least cost.
-
We also must consider the impact
of erroneous assessments on our
relationship with our customers.
-
Based on the above, the Service may
recompute the estimated tax penalty
when the taxpayer files a subsequent
return that increases or decreases
the tax, even if filing occurs after
the due date of the return
(including extensions). In the SFR
situation, the taxpayer's signed
return is considered the original
return.
-
Estimated tax penalty adjustments to
SFR modules (i.e. TC 150 of 00 $'s,
with tax assessed by a TC 290/300)
must be
manually computed and
assessed.
20.1.3.2.7.3 (02-01-2003)
Schedule H & Estimated Tax Penalty
- IRC
section 3510 was enacted by the
Social Security Domestic Employment
Reform Act of 1994, P.L. 103–387, to
simplify the payment of employment
taxes for individuals who employ
domestic workers. Under section
3510, an individual who employs only
domestic workers may report
employment taxes on Form 1040,
Schedule H, and pay the employment
taxes in a lump sum in connection
with that filing. Individuals who
pay domestic service employment
taxes using the Schedule H, may be
subject to additions to tax under
IRC section 6654 for failure to pay
estimated taxes. See IRC section
3510(b)(1).
- IRC
section 3510(b)(2) provides that
generally, individuals will not be
subject to an estimated tax penalty
if the individual was not subject to
federal income tax withholding
(i.e., from wages, pensions,
annuities, etc.) and the tax owed
would not exceed $1,000 but for the
household employment taxes.
20.1.3.3
(08-20-1998)
Penalty Transaction Codes
- ES
Penalty Transaction Codes are:
- TC
176—Computer generated assessment of
an ES penalty.
- TC
177—Computer generated abatement of
an ES penalty.
- TC
170—Manual assessment of an ES
penalty.
- TC
171—Manual abatement of an ES
penalty.
- Manual
assessments are determined by Area or
service center employees and are input
through IDRS. Employees who cannot
directly input the penalty assessment to
IDRS need to follow functional
guidelines to request input of the
assessment.
- If an
incorrect return (i.e., wrong taxpayer
or wrong tax period) posts to an account
first, then, when the correct return
posts, the ES penalty must be manually
computed.
- When
taxpayers use the Annualized Income
Installment Method any adjustment to the
penalty must be computed manually.
20.1.3.4
(08-20-1998)
Adjustments after Penalty Assessment
- This
section will discuss the procedures and
criteria for abatement or waiver of
estimated tax penalties.
20.1.3.4.1 (08-20-1998)
Evaluating Claims for Abatement or
Waiver of Estimated Tax Penalties
- For
periods prior to January 1, 1984,
there was NO basis for waiver of the
estimated tax penalty. For periods
after December 31, 1983, specific
waiver provisions under IRC section
6654(e) were adopted.
- To
evaluate these requests use data
available via the various CFOL
commands, if possible, as it should
expedite processing of the request. In
some cases it may be necessary to
secure the original return. Review
taxpayer's request and the return data
for the following items:
-
The amount of estimated tax
penalty requested to be waived;
and
-
Taxpayer's explanation of
eligibility for estimated tax
penalty waiver.
-
Request additional information from
the taxpayer, as needed.
- If the
taxpayer establishes the waiver
criteria take the necessary action to
suppress or adjust the penalty as
appropriate.
- When a
determination is made to cancel an
estimated tax penalty because the
individual is entitled to a waiver,
the appropriate Penalty Reason Code
must be entered either on the case
file or the input document and entered
into the Master File.
20.1.3.4.1.1 (08-20-1998)
Procedures for Claiming an
Abatement or Waiver of the
Estimated Tax Penalty
-
Taxpayers may claim abatement or
waiver on their tax return or on
Form 2210 or 2210F. They may send a
letter or other correspondence
requesting abatement or waiver of
the estimated tax penalty. The
request could also be made by
personal (face to face) contact. See
IRM 20.1.3.4.1.2, Waivers based on
Legislative Action.
- To
claim a waiver, based on a change to
the tax law, the affected taxpayers
should:
-
Compute the penalty (by
completing Form 2210 or 2210F)
on the basis of the law in
effect
before the changes
were made, and on the basis of
the law in effect
after
the changes were made. The
penalty amount eligible for the
waiver is the difference between
the two computations.
-
If preparing Form 2210 or 2210F,
follow the instructions for
completing the form.
-
The taxpayer should attach an
explanation showing their
computation and the amount of
penalty to be waived.
-
If the required information is
available, verify the
computation (math) and
attachments. Review the
explanation of "waiver
eligibility " . The explanation
must show what caused the tax
increase and related
underpayment of estimated tax.
20.1.3.4.1.2 (02-01-2003)
Waivers Based on Legislative
Action
- The
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 waives
the estimated tax penalties for any
payment due before January 16, 1998,
with respect to any underpayment
attributable to such period to the
extent such underpayment was created
or increased by any provision of the
Act.
- The
Small Business Job Protection Act of
1996 provides a waiver for all or
part of the estimated tax penalty
for an underpayment of any
installments due before August 20,
1996, to the extent that such
increased underpayment was created
by a provision of the Act.
Instructions for claiming this
waiver are included in the 1996 Form
2210 instructions.
- For
any period beginning before April
16, 1994, the Service will waive the
estimated tax penalty to the extent
an underpayment was created or
increased by the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act (OBRA) of 1993.
- In
Notice 92–6, 1992–1 C.B. 495, the
Service announced the waiver of
penalties for tax year 1992, to the
extent the underpayment by an
employee or retiree is attributable
to a reduction in Federal income tax
withholding for 1992 caused by the
new withholding tables/rates
effective for wages paid after
February 1992.
- For
1988, estimated tax penalty relief
was provided because of changes made
by the Technical and Miscellaneous
Revenue Act of 1988. These changes
allowed individuals until April 15,
1989, to pay any underpayment on
estimated tax due to changes made by
Titles I and/or II of this Act.
-
The taxpayer's needs to specify
which provisions of Titles I
and/or II of the Act Sections
1001 through 2006 resulted in a
tax increase that was the cause
of the underpayment.
-
See Announcement 89–2, IRB
1989–2, 19.
- For
first quarter 1988 estimated tax
payment(s) only, the estimated tax
penalty under IRC section 6654 may
be waived against owners of a
partnership or "S" corporation who
were precluded from timely and
accurately estimating and paying
their 1988 individual first quarter
payments, if they meet the following
conditions:
-
The partnership or "S"
corporation was unable to make
an IRC section 444 election to
change its taxable year by April
15, 1988, the due date of the
owner's first quarter payment,
because the regulations
concerning the election had not
been issued by IRS; and
-
As a result of the delay in
making an election, the
partnership or "S" corporation
was unable to provide the owners
with the information necessary
for accurately estimating the
amount of the first quarter
estimated tax payment.
-
Taxpayers in this situation who
received an estimated tax
penalty notice were instructed
to return the notice to IRS with
an explanation that they are
eligible for a penalty waiver
under Section III–B of IR
Bulletin Notice 88–49, 1988–C.B.
532. They were also asked to
include identification of the
partnership(s) or "S"
corporation(s) (or both) and the
portion of the penalty
attributable to each such
entity.
-
Allow the waiver on the first
installment only, from its due
date through August 15, 1988.
-
Only the portion of the penalty
attributable to IRC section 444
can be waived.
20.1.3.4.1.3 (02-01-2003)
Waivers based on Legislative
Action—Form 1041
- The
Tax Reform Act of 1986 placed
certain trusts and estates (Form
1041) under the same rules as
individuals for making payments of
estimated tax, effective for tax
years beginning after December 31,
1986.
- In
implementing this provision, an
administrative decision was made to
waive Form 1041 estimated tax
penalties for installments of
estimated tax due before July 1,
1987, provided the fiduciary made a
good faith effort to determine the
amount of the required installment
and timely pay the tax. See IRM
21.7.4.4.1.8.2, Notice 88–15, 1988–1
C.B. 482 and Notice 87–32, 1987–1
C.B. 477.
20.1.3.4.1.4 (08-20-1998)
Waiver Criteria Under IRC Section
6654(e)(3)(A)
- For
tax years beginning after December
31, 1983, IRC Section 6654(e)(3)(A)
provides that the estimated tax
penalty may be waived if the failure
to make the estimated tax payment is
due to casualty, disaster or other
unusual circumstances such that the
imposition of the penalty would be
against equity and good conscience.
This is
not equivalent to reasonable cause.
-
For example,
reliance on the advice of a
competent tax advisor may constitute
reasonable cause that would warrant
relief from other penalties, but it
does not
provide a basis for a waiver of the
estimated tax penalty under IRC
section 6654(e)(3)(A).
- In
order for the waiver to be
available, the failure to make the
payment must be caused by:
-
Casualty
-
Disaster, or
-
Other unusual circumstances, and
-
Imposition of the penalty would
be against equity and good
conscience.
-
Examples of situations where the
waiver may be
granted if it is
determined that imposition of the
penalty would be against equity and
good conscience:
-
The taxpayer's records are
destroyed by fire or flood or
other natural disaster. In many
instances of natural disaster,
area wide guidance on conditions
for waivers will be issued.
-
The taxpayer becomes seriously
ill or is seriously injured and
is unable to manage his affairs.
-
The taxpayer designates that an
overpayment of tax shown on a
prior return is to be credited
against estimated tax, but the
overpayment is offset for either
past-due child support or nontax
federal debt under IRC section
6402(c), and the taxpayer is not
notified of the offset before
the due date of the estimated
tax installment.
-
Examples of situations where the
waiver may not
be granted:
-
Reliance on the advice of a
competent tax advisor.
-
Retroactive application of a
statute or regulation unless the
statute or regulation
specifically grants a waiver of
the estimated tax penalty or the
Service announces in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin that
such a waiver has been granted.
-
Erroneous advice from the IRS
unless such advice falls within
the provisions of IRC section
6404(f), Abatement of Any
Penalty or Addition to Tax
Attributable to Erroneous
Written Advice by the Internal
Revenue Service, of the Internal
Revenue Code or IRC section
301.6404–3 of the regulations.
-
Requests for a waiver of the
estimated tax penalty under IRC
section 6654(e)(3)(A) must be
submitted in writing and signed by
the taxpayer. Waivers may not be
granted based on an oral request
from the taxpayer. Waiver of the
penalty must be specifically
approved by a manager or managerial
official.
20.1.3.4.1.5 (02-01-2003)
Waiver Criteria under IRC Section
6654(e)(3)(B)
-
Taxpayers may be eligible for a
"waiver" of the penalty under IRC
section 6654(e)(3)(B) if during the
tax year they:
-
Retire after having attained age
62, or
-
Become disabled in the taxable
year estimated payments are due,
or during the preceding taxable
year, and
-
The underpayment is due to
reasonable cause and not willful
neglect.
-
Reasonable Cause, as it applies
to the estimated tax penalty for
an individual, is considered
only when the individual meets
the conditions in (a) or (b) and
(c) above, and then only to
determine if the taxpayer is
eligible for a statutory waiver
of the penalty. See IRM
20.1.1.3, Relief from Penalties.
- When
the individual qualifies for this
statutory waiver, the estimated tax
penalty should be abated using
penalty reason code "44" to identify
the abatement. If the individual
does not meet the waiver conditions
in (a) or (b) and (d) above, send an
854C letter using paragraph " V"
informing the individual of the
reason for denial and explaining
his/her appear rights. Input TC 290
for zero with blocking series 98/99
and Reason Code 65.
20.1.3.4.1.6 (08-20-1998)
Bankruptcy: IRC Section 6658
- IRC
section 6658 prohibits the assertion
of the estimated tax penalty on
liabilities during the time the case
is pending a Title 11 bankruptcy
proceeding filed on or after October
1, 1979, if:
-
The tax was incurred by the
estate and the failure occurred
pursuant to an order of the
court finding probable lack of
funds for the estate to pay
administrative expenses, or
-
The tax was incurred by the
debtor before the order of
relief or the appointment of a
trustee in an involuntary case,
whichever is earlier, and
-
The bankruptcy petition is filed
before the due date of the
return including extensions, or
-
The date for making the addition
to the tax occurs on or after
the day on which the petition
was filed.
20.1.3.4.1.7 (08-20-1998)
Request for Abatement Due to an
Erroneous Refund of Estimated Tax
Payment, Offset, or Overpayment
(Credit Elect)
- If
the taxpayer claims that an
overpayment (credit elect) was
refunded in error or if an estimated
tax payment was erroneously refunded
by the Service, the taxpayer may be
entitled to have a portion of the
penalty abated. Verify the
taxpayer's statement by requesting
the prior year return and reviewing
account information
-
Abate the penalty if the
taxpayer promptly returns the
refund check or repays the
refund amount within 10 days of
its issue. Consider each case
individually to determine if the
refund was returned or repaid
promptly.
-
If the overpayment (credit
elect) was offset by IRS for
either past-due child support
nontax amounts owed to other
federal government agencies and
the taxpayer was not notified
prior to the estimated tax
payment due date, abate the
penalty if the taxpayer promptly
repaid the amount offset.
-
Example:
A taxpayer has an extension to
October 15th to file the return.
The return has an overpayment
that the taxpayer elects as a
credit to the next year's
return. If this overpayment is
offset and the taxpayer
does
not receive a notice until
December, the
repayment may be considered
prompt even if not received
until December or early January
of the following year. This
repayment should still be
considered as the taxpayer's
first quarterly installment for
penalty consideration.
20.1.3.4.1.8 (02-01-2003)
Individual Retirement Accounts
(IRA) Rollovers to Roth IRAs
- A
taxpayer with adjusted gross income
(AGI) of $100,000 or less may
convert a regular IRA into a Roth
IRA at any time. If a taxpayer
converts a traditional IRA to a Roth
IRA and elects to have the amount
included in income ratably over a
four-year period, and receives an
estimated tax penalty during one of
the four-year elections:
-
Do not remove the penalty.
-
Explain that it is the
taxpayer's responsibility to
increase their withholding to
cover the addtional tax.
-
Advise the taxpayer to increase
their withholding for future
years.
-
If the taxpayer uses the
Annualized method, divide the
amount equally between all four
quarters.
-
Taxpayers may elect to include the
entire amount in income in 1998.
20.1.3.4.2 (02-01-2003)
Denying the Request for a Waiver
- If the
waiver is denied, send an 854C letter
using paragraph " V" informing the
taxpayer of the reason for denial and
explaining his/her appeal rights.
Input TC 290 for zero with blocking
series 98/99 and Reason Code 65.
20.1.3.4.3 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Appeal Procedures
- For a
complete discussion of penalty
appeals, refer to IRM 20.1.1.
20.1.3.5
(08-20-1998)
Corporate Estimated Tax Penalty (IRC
Section 6655)
- IRC
section 6655 imposes an addition to tax
when a corporation (C or S), private
foundation, private foundation organized
as a trust, or tax exempt organization
makes an underpayment of estimated tax.
IRC section 6655 also applies to
qualified settlement funds described in
Treas. Regs. 1.468–B–1.
20.1.3.6
(08-20-1998)
Assertion Criteria
- For tax
years beginning after December 31, 1987,
to avoid the estimated tax penalty a
corporation must make estimated tax
payments if its tax shown on the return
(income tax minus credits) is $500 or
more. If the tax is less than $500, no
ES payments are required and a penalty
will not be assessed.
- The
Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act
of 1988 (P.L. 100–647), enacted November
10, 1988, clarified that IRC section
6655 will apply to private foundations
and private foundations organized as a
trust or corporation.
20.1.3.6.1 (08-20-1998)
Determining the Required Annual
Payment
- For
tax years beginning after December 31,
1987, and prior to January 1, 1992,
unless exceptions or waivers exist,
corporations and certain tax exempt
organizations with unrelated business
taxable income were required to prepay
the lesser of:
- 90
percent of its tax liability for
the current year,
-
100 percent of prior year tax
liability, or
-
The amount determined under the
annualized or adjusted seasonal
income installment method.
- The
corporation's prior tax year must have
been a full 12–month period for which
the corporation filed a return showing
a tax liability greater than zero.
-
Rev. Rul. 92–54, 1992–2 C.B. 320,
states that IRC section
6655(d)(1)(B)(ii) of the Code,
which allows a taxpayer to base
required installment payments of
estimated tax on the tax shown on
the return for the preceding
taxable year, does not apply to a
corporation that filed a return
for the preceding taxable year
showing $0 tax liability.
-
For example,
a corporation (other than a large
corporation, see 20.1.3.6.1.4) may
use 100 percent of the prior
year's tax to determine the
current year's ES payments when
the tax reported on the prior
year's tax return was for an
amount greater than zero.
- For
tax years beginning after
December
31, 1993, the applicable
percentage of a corporation's current
year tax liability increased to 100
percent.
- For
tax years beginning
after June
30, 1992, and before December 31, 1993,
the applicable percentage of a
corporation's current tax liability
increased to 97 percent.
- For
tax years beginning after
December
31, 1991 and before July 1, 1992,
the applicable percentage of a
corporation's current year tax
liability increased to 93 percent.
-
Corporations may use Form 1120–W,
Corporation Estimated Tax Worksheet,
to determine the amount of the
required payment for either the
regular, annualized income
installment, or the adjusted seasonal
installment method. Tax exempt
organizations may use Form 990–W,
Estimated Tax on Unrelated Business
Taxable Income for Tax-Exempt
Organizations. These forms are
designed to assist the corporation and
should not be filed with the Internal
Revenue Service.
- If a
corporation wants to use certain
annualization periods for estimated
tax purposes, it must make an election
on Form 8842, Election to Use
Different Corporate Annualization
Periods for Estimated Tax, by the due
date of the first estimated tax
installment (by the 15th day of the
fourth month of the year for which the
election is being made). Form 8842
will be processed by the Document
Perfection Branch in the Service
Centers using instructions in the Aims
Handbook, DP Tax Adjustments, Code and
Edit.
20.1.3.6.1.1 (08-20-1998)
Annual Payment Requirement Where
the Tax is Small
- A
corporation is not required to make
estimated tax payments if its tax is
less than $500.
20.1.3.6.1.2 (08-20-1998)
Domestic Corporations
-
Domestic corporations shall be
required to make estimated tax
payments based on tax and credit
determined taxable under any of the
following IRC sections:
-
IRC section 11—Tax Imposed
-
IRC section 1201(a)—Alternative
Tax for Corporations
-
Subchapter L of chapter
1—Insurance Companies
-
IRC section 55—Alternative
Minimum Tax Imposed
-
IRC section 59A—Environmental
Tax Credit, plus
-
IRC section 887—Imposition of
Tax on Gross Transportation
Income of Nonresident Aliens and
Foreign Corporations
-
Any applicable credits against
tax. (See IRC sections 21, 22,
25 and 26 to determine
applicable credits.)
20.1.3.6.1.3 (08-20-1998)
Foreign Corporations
- A
foreign corporation that has income
described in IRC section 882 (Tax on
Income of Foreign Corporations
connected with United States
business), which is subject to
taxation under IRC section 11 or
1201(a), or under subchapter L of
Chapter 1, must make estimated tax
payments on this income in the same
manner as a domestic corporation
described in 20.1.3.6.1.2 above.
- A
foreign corporation that has income
described in IRC section 881 (Tax on
Income of Foreign Corporations not
connected with United States
Business), in addition to income
described in IRC section 882 must
treat the tax imposed under IRC
section 881 as an IRC section 11 tax
on which estimated tax payments also
must be made.
- For
taxable years beginning after
December 31, 1994, taxpayers using
the annualization method to compute
estimated tax payments must take
into account income under sections
936(h) and 951(a) in a manner
specified in section 6655(e)(4). For
more information see Rev. Proc.
95–23, 1995–18 I.R.B. 5.
- A
foreign corporation that is not
subject to tax under IRC section 882
is not required to make estimated
tax payments on the tax imposed
under IRC section 881.
20.1.3.6.1.4 (08-20-1998)
Tax Exempt Organizations and
Private Foundations
- IRC
section 6655(g)(3) requires
estimated tax payment on the
unrelated business taxable income or
net investment income of tax exempt
organizations and private
foundations.
20.1.3.6.1.5 (08-20-1998)
S Corporations
-
Effective for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 1989,
IRC section 6655(g)(4) requires
estimated tax payments on certain
taxes imposed on S corporations.
-
IRC section 1371(d)(2)
(Coordination with Subchapter C)
shall be treated as taxes
imposed by IRC section 11.
-
IRC section 1374(a) (Tax Imposed
on certain Built-In Gains).
-
IRC section 1375(a) (Tax Imposed
when Passive Investment Income
of Corporation Subchapter C
Earnings and Profits Exceeds 25
Percent of Gross Receipts), and
-
Only ES payments under IRC
section 1375(a) may be based on
prior year tax. Prior year's tax
does not have to be for an
amount greater that zero.
20.1.3.6.1.6 (02-01-2003)
Large Corporations
- A
large corporation (or its
predecessor) is defined as a
corporation having taxable income of
$1,000,000 or more during any of the
three years preceding the taxable
year.
-
Large corporations for tax years
beginning
after December 31, 1987, and
prior to January 1, 1992,
were required to pay 90 percent of
the current years tax.
- For
tax years beginning after
December
31, 1993, the applicable
percentage a corporation's
current-year tax liability increased
to 100 percent.
-
A large corporation may use 100
percent of prior year tax
liability to determine the
estimated tax payment required
for only the first installment
of any tax year. (IRC section
6655(d)(2)(B)).
-
When the first estimated tax
payment is based on 100 percent
of the prior year's tax
liability, and that payment is
less than the applicable
percentage for the current
year's tax liability, the result
is considered an underpayment.
-
That underpayment from the first
quarter must be added to what
would otherwise be the required
payment (applicable percentage
for the current years tax
liability) for the second
quarter installment.
- For
taxable years beginning
after
June 30, 1992, and before December
31, 1993, the applicable
percentage of a corporation's tax
liability increased to 97 percent.
- For
tax years beginning
after
December 31, 1991, and before July
1, 1992,the applicable
percentage of a corporation's
current year tax liability increased
to 93 percent.
- If
any of the three preceding years
were less than a full year, the
corporation must multiply the
taxable income for the short year by
12 and divide the resulting amount
by the number of months in the short
year to determine if the corporation
meets the $1,000,000 criterion.
- When
the corporation is a member of a
controlled group the $1,000,000
amount specified shall be equally
divided among the members of the
controlled group, unless all members
agree to an unequal allocation of
the amount.
-
Large corporation taxable income is
determined without regard to any
amount carried to the taxable year
under IRC section 172 or 1212(a)
(net operating loss carryback or
carryover).
20.1.3.6.1.7 (02-01-2003)
Annualized or Adjusted Seasonal
Method of Determining the Required
Payment
- A
corporation may be able to lower one
or more of its required deposits if
its income is expected to vary
during the year. In general, if a
corporation establishes that either
the annualized or adjusted seasonal
method can reduce its required
installment from what it would be if
the regular method were used, the
corporation may pay the lesser
amount.
-
OBRA 1993 provides for an
election to be made if the
corporation wants to use
different annualization periods
for taxable years beginning
after December 31, 1993.
-
To make this election the
corporation must complete Form
8842, Election To use Different
Corporate Annualization Periods
for Estimated Tax, and file it
by the due date of the first
installment (by the 15th day of
the fourth month of the year for
which the election is being
made).
-
Form 8842 will be processed by
Document Perfection Branch in
the Service Centers. A TC 971
with action code 47 will be
input to provide an indicator on
IDRS that the election has been
made and will be used by
off-pipeline functions in
estimated tax penalty
determinations.
- The
corporation must attach a completed
Form 2220 to its return if the
annualized or adjusted seasonal
method of determining the payment is
used.
- A
corporation that reduces any
required installment by annualizing
its income, then switches to another
method to determine a required
deposit, must recapture 100 percent
of any prior reduction in the next
installment using the other method.
- The
annualized income installment for a
corporation is the excess of an
amount equal to the applicable
percentage of the tax for the
taxable year computed by placing on
an annualized basis the taxable
income, alternative minimum taxable
income, and modified alternative
minimum taxable income:
-
for the first 3 months (2 months
in the case of exempt
organizations) of the taxable
year, in the case of the first
required installment,
-
for the first 3 months of the
taxable year, in the case of the
second required installment,
-
for the first 6 months of the
taxable year, in the case of the
third required installment, and
-
for the first 9 months of the
taxable year, in the case of the
fourth required installment,
over the aggregate amount of any
prior required installments for
the taxable year.
20.1.3.6.2 (08-20-1998)
Period of Underpayment
- For
corporations the underpayment period
is determined by the number of days
from the payment due date to either:
-
The date the payment or partial
payment is received, or
-
The due date of the return (15th
day of the third month), without
regard to extensions.
- To
determine the number of days see
either the Perpetual or Leap Year
Julian Date Calendars.
- If
a payment due date falls on a
weekend or legal holiday, payments
received the next business day are
considered paid on the due date.
20.1.3.6.2.1 (08-20-1998)
Tax Exempt Organization
- For
certain tax exempt organizations
with unrelated business income, the
underpayment period shall be from
the date the payment is due until
either:
-
The date the payment or partial
payment is received, or
-
Due date of the return without
regard to extensions (the 15th
day of the fifth month rather
than the third month) following
the close of the tax year.
20.1.3.6.2.2 (08-20-1998)
Private Foundations
- For
Private Foundations and Private
Foundations organized as a Trust or
Corporations the underpayment period
is determined by the number of days
from the payment due date to either:
-
The date the payment or partial
payment is received, or
-
The due date of the return (15th
day of the fifth month) after
the end of the tax year without
regard to extensions.
20.1.3.6.2.3 (08-20-1998)
Excessive Adjustment
- IRC
section 6425 allows for an
adjustment to an overpayment of
corporate estimated income tax. Form
4466, Corporation Application for
Quick Refund of Overpayment of
Estimated Tax, shall be filed after
the last day of the taxable year,
and
-
On or before the 15th day of the
third month after the close of
the taxable year, and
-
Before the day on which the
corporation files its return.
- In
the event of an excessive
adjustment, IRC section 6655(h)
imposes a penalty.
- An
excessive adjustment is equal to the
lesser of:
-
The amount of the adjustment, or
-
The amount by which the income
tax liability shown on the
return for the taxable year
exceeds the estimated income tax
paid reduced by the amount of
the adjustment.
- The
penalty rate shall be determined
using the information contained in
IRM 20.1.3.6.6.
- The
period of the underpayment as it
relates to an excessive adjustment
under IRC section 6425 is:
-
From the date that the credit is
allowed (the 23C date), to
-
The return due date (without
regard to extensions).
20.1.3.6.3 (02-01-2003)
Payment Due Dates
- A
corporation's estimated tax payment
due dates are determined:
-
For a full
12-month period:
12-month calendar year payments
are due on the 15th day of April,
June, September, and December.
12-month
fiscal year payments
are due on the 15th day of the
4th, 6th, 9th, and 12th months of
the fiscal year.
-
For a period of
less than 12 months
(short period return) payment due
dates are determined by the number
of months in the short period. See
Exhibit 20.1.3–2 for payment dates
for individuals (Form 1040)
corporations (Form 1120) and
estate and trusts (Form 1041)
short-period returns. For a short
period return of
less
than 4 months
the corporate taxpayer is
not required to make estimated tax
payments. For a short period of
4 or
more months
the corporate taxpayer is not
required to make estimated tax
payments if it can be expected its
liability (income tax minus
credits) will be less than $500 by
the 1st day of the last month in
the short taxable year.
- A
corporation filing a short period
return that is either an initial or
final return, is
not
required to annualize its taxable
income to compute the
penalty.
- A
corporation filing a short period
return as a result of changes to its
annual accounting period
should
annualize its taxable income
to compute a penalty.
- If
sufficient income to meet the
estimated payment requirements is not
earned until the last month of a short
taxable period, the corporation is not
required to make estimated tax
payments on that income earned in the
last month. However, the corporation
is required to file a Form 2220, with
supporting worksheet, showing the
annualization of the income, and must
pay all estimated tax on or before the
15th day of the last month of the
short taxable year.
20.1.3.6.4 (08-20-1998)
Application of Estimated Tax
Payments and Credits
- This
subsection contains procedures for
application of estimated tax payments
and credits.
20.1.3.6.4.1 (08-20-1998)
Credit Applications Within the
Year
-
Payment application for
taxable
years beginning prior to January 1,
1988:
-
A payment that
is not in
excess of the amount
due for the current installment
cannot be used to credit an
earlier installment liability.
-
A payment that
is in
excess of a liability
due for the current installment
shall be considered a credit
available, and can be used to
satisfy the earliest outstanding
liability within that tax
period. A credit remaining after
both current and prior
liabilities have been satisfied,
may be carried forward.
-
A corporation may elect to
satisfy an installment of
estimated tax before it is due.
-
Payment application
for
taxable years beginning on or after
December 31, 1987:
-
Installment payments are applied
in received date order against
the earliest liability within
the tax period regardless of
when the payment was received.
-
When that installment is
satisfied, any excess will be
applied to the next liability
until all liabilities within a
given period are satisfied.
20.1.3.6.4.2 (08-20-1998)
Credits Applied from a Prior Year
- TC
716 or 710 (overpayment arising on
or before the due date of the prior
year's return) is applied against
the first required installment of
the next year's estimated tax unless
the taxpayer notifies the Service by
means of a statement attached to his
income tax return, that the
overpayment should be applied to
another installment.
20.1.3.6.4.3 (08-20-1998)
Verifying Credits on Master File
-
Credits claimed by the corporation
should be verified. This can be done
by checking the appropriate CFOL,
IDRS (i.e., TXMOD), or MRS
transcripts. Review both the dollar
amounts and the received dates of
any payments.
- TC
710 or TC 716 credit is a "credit
elect" overpayment received from the
prior tax period. It will be applied
as a credit to the first required
installment period.
- TC
660 deposits are made using an 8109
or 8109–B deposit coupon. This
deposit will post to the tax module
with the date the payment was
received at the Federal Depository.
- TC
670 subsequent payments will be
credited to a tax period as of the
received date of that payment.
- TC
610 is a payment that is received
with the return. This payment will
also post to the tax module as of
the date the payment was received.
20.1.3.6.5 (08-20-1998)
Determining Amount of the
Underpayment
- The
amount of the underpayment is the
required installment payment minus the
amount (if any) paid or credited on or
before the due date of the
installment.
20.1.3.6.6 (02-01-2003)
Penalty Rate
- The
estimated tax penalty rate is the
underpayment interest rate as
described in IRC section 6621 (Federal
short-term interest rate plus three
percentage points). The underpayment
interest rate is determined quarterly.
This means that the penalty on a
$1,000 underpayment for one quarterly
tax period may be different from the
penalty on a $1,000 underpayment for a
different quarterly tax period.
- The
underpayment interest rate or the
estimated tax penalty rate can be
obtained from the Internal Revenue
Bulletin, News Releases, TAX NEWS,
Servicewide Electronic Research
Program (SERP), and Notice 433,
Interest and Penalty Information.
- The
estimated tax penalty rate is NOT
compounded daily.
20.1.3.6.7 (08-20-1998)
Determining the Penalty Amount
- For
each installment, the penalty is
determined by multiplying:
-
The amount of the underpayment, by
-
The number of days the payment is
late, by
-
The applicable percentage rate.
- See
LEM 20.1.3.6.7.
-
Estimated tax penalties are computed
on the amount of tax reported on the
original return. A
second
return filed on or before the due date
of the return is considered
an original return.
- If
an
adjustment is made to
the tax of an original return,
before
the due date (including
extensions), as a result of either
an audit or the taxpayer filing an
amended return before the due date
the penalty amount may be
adjusted, based on the new tax
amount.
- If
an
adjustment is made to
the tax of an original return,
after
the return due date,
including extensions, as a result
of either an audit or the taxpayer
filing an amended return, the
penalty amount cannot be adjusted.
- If a
corporation did not timely make its
required payments, Master File will
compute the penalty unless the tax
module is restricted (prior TC 170/171
or computer condition code).
- For
additional restrictions to Master File
see LEM 20.1.3.6.7.5.
-
Revenue Agents, Revenue Officers, and
Tax Examiners with access to IDRS may
use command codes:
-
COMPAE/COMPAS to facilitate the
computation of the estimated tax
penalty.
-
PINEX (PIEST) to explain a
computer generated estimated tax
penalty computation to the
taxpayer. Once the penalty has
been restricted (either with TC
170/171 or a computer condition
code) PINEX is no longer able to
explain the penalty computation.
-
Specific instructions regarding
the input of both the COMPA and
PINEX command codes are contained
in the Aims Handbook, IDRS
Terminal Inquiries and IDRS
Terminal Input.
20.1.3.6.7.1 (08-20-1998)
Form 2220, Underpayment of
Estimated Tax by Corporations
-
Corporations
may complete Form 2220
to compute, reduce or eliminate an
estimated tax penalty. In some cases
a corporation
must
file a Form 2220. See Instructions
for Form 2220 for more information.
-
Part I determines the amount of
any underpayment for each of the
four installment periods.
-
Part II is used to compute any
applicable penalty. Several of
the last lines of part II
provide the formula, but do not
provide the applicable
percentage rate for determining
the penalty amount. To determine
the appropriate penalty rate see
IRM 20.1.3.6.6.
-
If a corporation's income varies
during the tax year, it may use
the Annualized Income
Installment Worksheet or the
Adjusted Seasonal Installment
Worksheet included with the Form
2220.
20.1.3.7
(08-20-1998)
Penalty Transaction Codes
- ES
Penalty Transaction Codes are:
- TC
176—Computer generated assessment of
an ES penalty,
- TC
177—Computer generated abatement of
an ES penalty,
- TC
170—Manual assessment of an ES
penalty,
- TC
171—Manual abatement of an ES
penalty.
- Manual
assessments are determined by Area or
Service center employees and are input
through IDRS. Employees who cannot
directly input the penalty assessment to
IDRS need to follow functional
guidelines to request the input of an
assessment.
- If an
incorrect return (i.e. wrong taxpayer or
wrong tax period) posts to an account
first, then, when the correct return
posts, the ES penalty must be manually
computed.
20.1.3.8
(08-20-1998)
Adjustments After the Penalty
Assessment
- This
section discusses the procedures and
criteria for abatement or waiver of
estimated tax penalties.
20.1.3.8.1 (08-20-1998)
Evaluating Claims for Abatement or
Waiver of Estimated Tax Penalties
-
Reasonable Cause
is not
grounds for adjusting or abating BMF
Estimated Tax Penalties.
-
Estimated Tax Penalties may be
adjusted or abated when:
-
Misapplied prepayments are located
and applied to the correct tax
period or identification number,
or
-
Prepayments were refunded in error
and are returned by the taxpayer
within 10 days, or
- If
it is determined the estimated tax
penalty was assessed as the result
of a Service error.
-
Waivers are sometimes granted by
legislation, regulation, or
administrative pronouncements to
provide relief from estimated tax
penalties created by the retroactive
application or a change in statute or
Service position.
20.1.3.8.1.1 (08-20-1998)
Procedures for Requesting a Waiver
- To
claim a "waiver" the corporation
must explain which provision of the
Revenue Act of 1988, Titles I and/or
II of Act sections 1001 through 2006
or other specific legislative or
administrative provisions caused the
tax increase and related
underpayment.
Only
after this information is provided
can a waiver be considered.
- To
claim the waiver, affected
corporations should:
-
Compute the penalty (by
completing Form 2220) on the
basis of the law in effect
before the
changes were made, and on the
basis of the law in effect
after
the changes were
made. The penalty amount
eligible for the waiver is the
difference between the two
computations.
-
Write the word
"waiver"
on the bottom margin of the
return.
-
Write the
"waiver amount"
on the dotted line to the
left of the column provided for
the penalty amount.
- The
corporation must attach an
explanation showing its computation
and the amount of penalty to be
waived.
-
Review the corporation's
explanation of "waiver
eligibility " .
-
Math verify the corporation's
Form 2220 computation and
attachments.
20.1.3.8.1.2 (08-20-1998)
Waivers Based on Legislative
Action
- The
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 waives
the estimated tax penalties for any
period before January 1, 1998, for
any payment due date that is before
January 16, 1998, with respect to
any underpayment attributable to
such period to the extent such
underpayment was created or
increased by any provision of the
Act.
- The
Small Business Job Protection Act of
1996 provides a waiver of all or
part of the estimated tax penalty
for an underpayment of any
installment due
before August 20, 1996,
to the extent that such underpayment
was created or increased by a
provision of the Act. Instructions
for claiming this waiver are
included in the 1996 Form 2220
instructions.
- For
any underpayment period ending
before March 16, 1994, the Service
will waive the estimated tax penalty
to the extent an underpayment was
created or increased by the Omnibus
Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) of
1993. Instructions for claiming a
waiver based on OBRA 1993 are
included in the 1993 Form 2220
instructions.
- The
Revenue
Reconciliation Act of 1990
changed the way an insurance company
handles the amortization of policy
acquisition expenses and the
treatment of salvage. A penalty
resulting from any underpayment of
estimated tax attributable to the
changes made by the Act to IRC
sections 807(e), 832(b)4, 832(b)(5),
and 848 for any period before March
16, 1991, will be waived.
- If
excise tax from a
Real
Estate Investment Trust
is included with income tax on Form
1120, the estimated tax penalty will
not be charged on the excise portion
of the tax reported. The amount of
tax to be exempt from estimated tax
payments should be included on the
Schedule J of Form 1120 and coded
REIT
Income.
- P.L.
100–647 provided that corporations
may obtain relief from estimated tax
penalties to the extent they
underpaid their 1988 estimated tax.
They had until March 15, 1989, to
correct any deficiency (pay any
income tax in full) to the extent
those underpayments were
attributable to changes in the law
made by
Titles I and/or II of the Technical
and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of
1988.
-
Corporations may obtain a waiver of
estimated tax penalties for any
period before March 16, 1987, to the
extent they underpaid their 1986
estimated tax as a result of
any
provision of the Tax Reform Act of
1986 .
-
The Tax Reform Act of 1986 made
changes to the Internal Revenue
Code that substantially impacted
the determination of corporate
tax liability.
-
For taxable years beginning in
1987, a large corporation can
base its estimated tax payments
on the prior year's tax
liability for the first two
payments due on or before June
15, 1987 (or the first
installment for a fiscal year
corporation whose tax year began
on or before March 1, 1987). Any
underpayment due to this
exception must be recaptured in
the most recent installment of
estimated tax due on or before
September 15, 1987.
-
For installment payments due on
or before July 1, 1987,
corporations whose first taxable
year began before January 1,
1987, can use the " safe harbor"
in IRC section 1.6655–2T of the
regulations.
-
Corporations using this "safe
harbor" method must file Form
2220 showing the computation of
the penalty based on this
annualized method.
20.1.3.8.1.3 (08-20-1998)
Bankruptcy: IRC Section 6658
- IRC
section 6658 prohibits the assertion
of estimated tax penalty on
liabilities during the time the case
is pending a Title 11 bankruptcy
proceeding filed on or after October
1, 1979.
-
Abate corporate estimated tax
payment penalties with respect to an
order by the court finding probable
insufficiency of funds of the estate
to pay administrative expenses.
-
Abate corporate estimated tax
payment penalties where:
-
The tax was incurred by the
debtor before the earlier of the
order for relief, or the
appointment of a trustee (in the
involuntary case), and
-
The bankruptcy petition was
filed before the due date
prescribed by law (including
extensions) for filing a return
of such tax, or on or before the
date for making the IRC section
6655 penalty was imposed.
20.1.3.8.1.4 (08-20-1998)
Request for Abatement Due to an
Erroneous Refund of Estimated Tax
Payment, Offset, or Overpayment
(Credit Effect)
- If
the taxpayer claims that an
overpayment (credit elect) was
refunded in error or if an estimated
tax payment was erroneously refunded
by the Service, the taxpayer may be
entitled to have a portion of the
penalty abated. Verify the
taxpayer's statement by requesting
the prior year return and reviewing
account information.
-
Abate the penalty if the taxpayer
promptly returns the refund check or
repays the refund amount within 10
days of its issue. Consider each
case individually to determine if
the refund was returned or repaid
promptly.
20.1.3.8.2 (02-01-2003)
Denying the Request for a Waiver
- If the
waiver is denied, send an 854C letter
using paragraph " V" informing the
taxpayer of the reason for denial and
explaining their appeal rights, Input
TC 290 for zero with blocking series
98/99.
20.1.3.8.3 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Appeal Procedures
- For a
complete discussion of penalty
appeals, refer to IRM 20.1.1.
Exhibit 20.1.3-1 (02-01-2003)
INSTALLMENT DUE DATES FOR FORMS 1040
AND 1041
Exhibit 20.1.3-2 (02-01-2003)
INSTALLMENT DUE DATES AND PERCENTAGES
OF ESTIMATED TAX DUE FOR FISCAL OR
SHORT PERIOD RETURNS
Exhibit 20.1.3-3 (02-01-2003)
Modified Adjusted Gross Income
Modified Expected Tax
|
Modified
Adjusted Gross Income |
|
|
|
|
|
For
purposes of this provision,
"modified adjusted gross income" is
determined by making the following
adjustments to the expected current
year's adjusted gross income (AGI):
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
do not
include any taxable gain from the
sale or exchange of a principal
residence, |
|
|
|
|
|
• |
do not
include any taxable gain from a
casualty, theft, condemnation, or
other involuntary conversation,
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
unless
the taxpayer is a general partner or
10 percent owner in a passthrough
entity (partnerships and/or S
corporations), items from
passthrough entities for the PRIOR
year (if any) are to be treated as
if occurring in current year and any
actual passthrough items for the
current year are disregarded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Items
from passthrough entities include
any item of income, gain, loss,
deduction, or credit attributable to
an interest in a partnership or S
corporation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Gain or
loss from the disposition of a
interest in a partnership or S
corporation is not considered a
passthrough item. |
|
|
|
|
|
• |
If 90
percent of the current year's "
modified expected tax" , based on
"modified adjusted gross income" is
larger than 100 percent of the
preceding year's tax, then the
required current year's payment is
the smaller
of 90 percent of the current year's
total expected tax or 90 percent of
the current year's modified expected
tax "modified expected tax"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modified
Expected Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
Generally you will compute your
"modified expected tax" as you would
your total estimated tax with the
following exceptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
• |
begin
with the modified adjusted gross
income, and |
|
|
|
|
|
• |
do not
include itemized deductions, credits
or items affecting other taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review
Publication 505, Tax Withholding and
Estimated Tax each year for
additional specific instructions
regarding income to include or
exclude. |
Exhibit 20.1.3-4 (02-01-2003)
Farmer/Fishers Gross Income
|
Taxpayers qualify as Farmers or
Fishers if two-thirds of their gross
income is from farming or fishing.
|
|
Determining
Farmer/Fisher Gross Income
|
|
Analyze
income items found on page 1 of Form
1040: |
|
Wages, |
|
Interest, |
|
Dividends, |
|
Refunds
of state and local income tax, |
|
Alimony
received, |
|
Capital
gain distributions not reported on
Schedule D (prior to January 1,
1987, 2 1/2
times the amount shown on Form
1040), |
|
Fully
taxable pensions, IRA Distributions,
and annuities, |
|
Taxable
portion of other pensions and
annuities, |
|
Taxable
amount of unemployment compensation, |
|
Taxable
amount of social security benefits, |
|
Other
income. |
|
Analyze
entries on schedules and forms: |
|
Schedule C, gross income (losses
are considered zero), |
|
Schedule D, short term and long
term capital gains (each must be
considered separately, losses are
considered zero, |
|
Schedule E, rents, royalties,
partnerships, and trusts (all gains
are considered separately, losses
are considered zero), |
|
Schedule F, gross income, Part I,
or gross income, Part III,
|
|
Form
4797, Sale of Business Property. |
|
Compute
two-thirds gross income: |
|
Gross
income times .6667 = two-thirds
gross income. |
|
Compare
two-thirds gross income to gross
farming or fishing income: |
|
If the
farming or fishing income is
two-thirds of the gross income, the
taxpayer qualifies as a farmer or
fisher. |
20.1.4.1
(09-10-1999)
Overview and General
- This is
a section of the penalty handbook which
contains procedures for all IRS
employees on the failure to deposit (FTD)
penalty.
- The
Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 6656
provides for a FTD Penalty if a taxpayer
does not deposit tax in the correct
amount, within the prescribed time
period, and/or in the required manner.
- The
penalty applies to tax deposits for the
forms listed on Exhibit 20.1.4–1.
- The
obligation to deposit employment/excise
taxes is ongoing and requires that the
taxpayer continue to follow the
requirements as long as the taxpayer is
incurring these taxes. For example, as
long as an employer has employees and is
issuing a payroll, that employer must
deposit as required.
- IRC
Code section 6656 also provides for
penalty relief from the FTD penalty
for non-compliance if the taxpayer
can establish reasonable cause for
the non-compliance (failure to
deposit correctly). It is important
to note that the penalty relief does
not make a
non-compliant act compliant,
but rather relieves the taxpayer of
the penalty incurred for failing to
deposit as required.
- IRC
provisions for removal of the FTD
penalty due to reasonable cause are
expanded in Policy Statements. Other
statutory and/or administrative
provisions may also apply to allow
penalty relief. See IRM 20.1.1 for
general discussions of penalty
relief criteria and IRM 20.1.4.16
for penalty relief provisions
specific to the FTD penalty.
-
Penalties are primarily an enforcement
action and secondarily an education
tool. As such, the assertion or the
removal of penalties is not to be taken
lightly. There should be no assumption
that penalty assessments have been made
because of Service error or that
penalties should be removed
just for the
asking.
20.1.4.1.1 (07-15-1998)
Reporting Criteria
-
Taxpayers who withhold taxes (incur
employment tax liabilities) are
required to file returns reporting
their tax liability, how the liability
is categorized (FICA, FIT, etc.) and
when during the return period the
liability was incurred.
- In
addition to reporting the total taxes
incurred within the tax return period,
the taxpayer must provide a periodic
breakdown of their tax liability. This
periodic breakdown is generally
referred to as the Record of Federal
Tax Liability (ROFT). This liability
information is requested in various
formats on the different employment
tax returns. For example, a Form 941
filer may report their liability
information on line 17 of the Form 941
form or may be required to use Form
941, Schedule B.
-
The ROFT shows the date that the
liability is incurred. For
employment tax forms this will be
the date that the employer issues
paychecks to the employees. The
ROFT is asking for the amount of
the
liability not the
amount of the deposit.
-
Deposit (TC 650) and payment (TC
610/670) information (received by
the Service throughout the return
period) is compared to the
liability information (provided by
the taxpayer on the return) to
determine compliance with the
deposit requirements. All
transaction codes (TCs) are
defined in OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Document 6209, ADP and IDRS
Information
.
20.1.4.1.2 (09-10-1999)
Notice Information
- As a
return is processed, various computer
codes are added to the return data.
These codes are written on the return
by Code and Edit function or they are
systemically generated by the computer
program from the input of the tax data
shown on the return. These codes (see
IRM 20.1.4.11.2.2) determine whether
the FTD Penalty issue will be:
-
Manually reviewed, calculated,
assessed, or
-
systemically assessed.
- Some
of the notices related to the FTD
program are internal notices which
require a mandatory review of an
account:
-
CP 194—Issued
for manual review because Master
File does not have enough
information to determine if an FTD
Penalty applies.
-
CP 294—Issued
to determine if an additional 5
percent penalty (fourth tier)
applies on a module where the tax
liability remains unpaid and the
FTD Penalty is restricted by TC
180 (Deposit Penalty).
-
Notices issued directly to taxpayers
which require a response:
-
CP 207—Issued
to notify taxpayer of proposed FTD
Penalty due to missing, incomplete
or illegible tax liability
information (i.e., ROFT).
-
CP 161—First
notice issued to inform taxpayer
of tax, penalty and/or interest
due.
-
Other adjustment notices (e.g.,
math error, balance due or
overpayment) issued to inform the
taxpayer of a penalty assessment.
See IRM Part III for more
information about a specific
notice.
20.1.4.1.3 (09-10-1999)
Authorized Depositary
-
Generally, taxpayers who file Forms
941, 943, 940, 945, 720, 1042, 1120,
and CT–1 must deposit taxes with an
authorized depositary when the tax
liability reaches certain dollar
amounts. (See IRM 20.1.4.2.2 for
additional information.) However, Form
720 filers are liable for deposits of
only certain excise taxes. See IRM
20.1.4.8 for additional information.
- An
authorized depositary is the Federal
Reserve Bank (FRB) serving the
taxpayer’s geographic area. It may
also be an approved commercial bank or
other financial institution. Taxpayers
can contact their area FRB to get a
listing of local authorized financial
institutions. If the taxpayer cannot
locate a FRB, refer the taxpayer to a
number listed below.
-
Taxpayer Service Toll-Free Number
1–800–829–1040.
-
Telecommunications Device for the
Deaf (TDD) 1–800–829–4059.
-
Payments made directly to the IRS or
to an unauthorized institution can
result in a failure-to-deposit
Penalty.
- For
information on service center pipeline
processing of Federal Tax Deposit
payments, see IRM Part III, Federal
Tax Deposit System.
- Monies
are sent by authorized depositaries to
the Treasury. Deposit information is
sent to one of the following
Processing Sites by depositaries:
-
Austin Service Center (AUSC)
-
Cincinnati Service Center (CSC)
-
Kansas City Service Center (KCSC),
-
Memphis Service Center (MSC), or
-
Ogden Service Center (OSC)
20.1.4.1.3.1 (09-10-1999)
Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT)
-
Legislation passed in 1993 requires
certain taxpayers to make their
deposits via an electronic funds
transfer (EFT) system. This system
allows for the electronic transfer
of funds from taxpayer accounts and
the conveyance of deposit
information directly to the Treasury
.
-
Congress enacted section 6302(h) of
the Internal Revenue Code in 1993 to
require the IRS to implement an EFT
system. The Service was required to
phase-in this system between 1994
and 1999, affecting a progressively
larger group of taxpayers each year.
- The
Service had for several years been
working on the development of an EFT
system. TAXLINK was the prototype
EFT system that was operational as
of the effective date of the
legislation and the accompanying
revised regulations. The Service
developed the Electronic Federal Tax
Payment System (EFTPS) in response
to Section 6302(h) requirement.
- The
taxpayer must begin depositing
electronically on January 1 of the
year they become required. The year
they become required is based on the
taxpayer’s total deposits of certain
taxes exceeding a prescribed dollar
threshold during the determination
period.
-
Initially, the requirement to
deposit electronically is based
on an analysis of the total
deposits of employment taxes.
These are the taxes imposed by
IRC Chapter 21, Federal
Insurance Contribution Act,
Chapter 22, Railroad Retirement
Tax Act, and Chapter 24,
Collection of Income Tax at
Source on Wages.
-
See Exhibit 20.1.4–3 for
threshold amounts,
determinations periods and
applicable effective dates.
- Once
a taxpayer meets the threshold and
is required to deposit
electronically:
-
All taxes required to be
deposited by that taxpayer must
be deposited electronically (not
just the taxes considered in the
determination analysis), and
-
This taxpayer can no longer use
coupons or any other means to
deposit without being subject to
the failure-to-deposit Penalty,
referred to as the avoidance
penalty.
-
Deposits made electronically use the
Automated Clearing House (ACH)
financial network which transfers
funds and passes tax payment
information to IRS. ACH is the
banking industry’s system for moving
payments electronically between
financial institutions (for EFTPS
purposes, between financial
institutions and the Treasury).
-
Before any attempt is made to
transfer monies electronically,
taxpayers must enroll in the system.
See IRM section below.
-
The enrollment process is very
similar to the one your bank may
use now to arrange for a direct
debit (e.g., an automated bill
payer account), or credit (e.g.,
Direct Deposit) to your account.
-
The taxpayer instructs
Treasury’s financial agent to
originate an ACH debit entry to
a specifically identified bank
account or instructs their own
financial institution to debit
their account to the
government’s financial
institution.
-
There are no new penalties or
changes to the basic deposit rules
inherent in using EFT. Taxpayers are
penalized for not depositing on
time, in the correct amount, or in
the manner required.
-
EFT has been added as an
additional required deposit
method.
-
Previously, specific deposits
were charged the
avoidance portion of
the FTD penalty for failure to
use the FTD system (not using a
coupon).
-
A taxpayer required to deposit
electronically will be assessed
this same
avoidance portion of
the FTD penalty for failing to
deposit electronically (not
depositing in the required
manner).
20.1.4.1.3.2 (09-10-1999)
Electronic Federal Tax Payment
System (EFTPS)
- The
Electronic Federal Tax Payment
System (EFTPS) is the electronic tax
payment system that the federal
government uses to accept all
electronically transmitted tax
payments. EFTPS will accept all
types of tax payments from both
businesses and individuals.
-
EFTPS uses two government designated
Treasury
Financial Agents (TFAs)
to process tax payment information.
-
Generally, First National Bank
of Chicago will handle taxpayers
who live and bank in the
northern portion of the U.S.
-
Generally, NationsBank will
service those taxpayers who live
and bank in the southern portion
of the U.S.
-
See Exhibit 20.1.4–3, Cont. 1
for a list of which states will
generally use which TFA.
-
Before any funds can be transferred
electronically, the taxpayer must be
enrolled in EFTPS. Taxpayers, both
those required to deposit
electronically and those who are
doing so voluntarily, may obtain
enrollment forms and other EFTPS
specific information by calling the
EFTPS Customer Service Center. The
numbers are:
-
First Chicago—1–800–945–8400,
and
-
NationsBank—1–800–555–4477.
-
Several indicators have been created
to aid in identifying and working
with electronic deposits. See
Exhibit 20.1.4–2, Cont. for a chart
of new terms, codes and indicators
and where they are located on your
research materials.
-
Enrollment Code
-
EFT Number
-
Electronic Payment Indicator
-
Deposits made after December 31,
1996 will carry an extra field in
the record layout for recording how
the payment was received. Whether
the deposit or payment was received
electronically will now be displayed
for determining whether the taxpayer
deposited in the required manner.
-
Because EFTPS replaces the prototype
TAXLINK system which many taxpayers
used to pay Federal Tax Deposits
(FTDs), the Service assisted TAXLINK
users in the transition to EFTPS.
-
Reference IRM Part III in the
Payment Tracer book for instructions
on requesting payment research
information.
- See
20.1.4.16 for additional information
regarding provisions to ease the
phase-in periods.
20.1.4.1.3.3 (09-10-1999)
Same Day Settlement/
FEDWIRE/ETA
- This
funds-transfer system is owned and
operated by the Federal Reserve
Banks (FRB) and is used primarily
for the transmission and settlement
of payment orders, the same day.
Financial institutions use the FRB
(Minneapolis) to transfer directly
into the Treasury’s General Account.
-
FEDWIRE has been operational for
many years. IRS required the use of
FEDWIRE for certain types of
deposits (e.g., certain CT–1
deposits) to move large sums
immediately into the Treasury’s
General Account (same day
settlements).
-
Because ACH is a two-step process
(initiate the instructions one day,
the money actually moves the next),
some taxpayers (e.g. $100,000
depositors) had difficulty making
timely deposits. If taxpayers missed
the ACH cut-off time to initiate a
timely deposit, they could use the
FRB (Minneapolis) FEDWIRE as a
deposit option.
- As
the systems have evolved, the same
day settlement feature is now
referred to as the Electronic Tax
Application (ETA).
-
Under EFTPS.
All taxpayers
may use ETA as a
routine payment option, and as a
backup payment method.
Enrollment in EFTPS
automatically enrolls the
taxpayer to use ETA as a backup
payment method.
-
Under TAXLINK.
Taxpayers
who are required to
make FTD’s by EFT,
may use
FEDWIRE as a routine payment
option, and
must use it as a
backup payment method. TAXLINK
users had to separately enroll
to use FEDWIRE as a backup
payment method. Once accepted,
however, there were no limits to
the number of times the taxpayer
could use FEDWIRE. FEDWIRE was
not available to be used as a
routine payment option for
taxpayers
who voluntarily
participate in TAXLINK.
Voluntary participants could use
FEDWIRE (for a limited number of
times) as a backup payment
option.
20.1.4.1.3.4 (07-15-1998)
TAXLINK
-
TAXLINK was the prototype electronic
funds transfer system in operation
between 1992 and July 1997. TAXLINK
accepted electronically transmitted
FTD deposits only. In TAXLINK, as in
EFTPS, taxpayers could choose to
participate voluntarily. However, a
taxpayer that is required by
regulations to use EFT cannot revert
to the paper coupon system to make
an FTD. If the taxpayer is unable to
make the FTD using an Automated
Clearing House (ACH) credit or debit
payment option, they may use
FEDWIRE. Note FEDWIRE discussion
above.
-
Research on TAXLINK payment system
may be obtained from the Atlanta
Service Center (ATSC) TAXLINK
Accounting Technical Unit. A TAXLINK
Request for Research Form should be
completed and sent to the TAXLINK
Accounting Technical Unit.
-
The top three sections of the
form should be completed with as
much information as possible.
-
The TAXLINK Accounting Technical
Unit will complete the research,
return a copy of the form with
the requested information to the
initiator, and maintain a copy
of the request.
-
The completed form may be sent
via FAX to the TAXLINK
Accounting Technical Unit at
404-455-2512. Telephone calls
for research requests may be
placed through 404-455-2389.
-
Authorized Financial Agents (FA’s)
receive taxpayer information and
transfer taxpayer funds to
Treasury’s general account.
-
These deposits are identified by an
EFT number which is the unique
identifier in the TAXLINK system for
each EFT transaction. This 8 digit
number is similar to the one used in
our paper-based FTD system.
- The
first two
digits represent the service center
where the payment was made. The
third
digit represents a TAXLINK payment
and will always be the number
"" 6 .
The
fourth through tenth
digits represent the Financial
Agent’s numbers as follows:
-
FRB, Minneapolis (FA
# 1)\/60000000–61999999,
-
First National Maryland (FA # 2
& 3)|62000000–63999999,
-
Mercantile, St. Louis (FA # 4 &
5)|64000000–65999999, and
-
FRB,
Minneapolis|69700000–69999999
(FEDWIRE only).
20.1.4.1.3.5 (09-10-1999)
ADEPT
-
Automated Deposit of Electronic
Payments for Taxes (ADEPT) was a
prototype system which
electronically processed deposits
through the FRB of Boston to the
Andover Service Center. This
prototype (test) was discontinued
December 31, 1992. Any payments made
to ADEPT after December 31, 1992,
were rolled over into the TAXLINK
system.
-
ADEPT deposits (for prior years) can
be identified by reviewing the
microfilm serial number.
-
The first two digits represent
the service center (08—Andover
Service Center) where the
deposit was processed.
-
The third and fourth digits (71)
represent a payment made through
the ADEPT System.
-
Because no paper document exists, do
not request a photocopy of the FTD
coupon. Follow FTD payment tracer
procedures (IRM Part III, Payment
Tracer) for tracing deposits made to
another service center.
20.1.4.1.3.6 (09-10-1999)
Federal Tax Deposit Coupons
- When
employers request an Employer
Identification Number (EIN) or
indicate that they will be paying
employees, they are issued a book of
Federal Tax Deposit Coupons, Form
8109. Most taxpayers use this
deposit method.
-
Though employers should be
encouraged to use the coupon
books, if a taxpayer does not
have a Form 8109 when a deposit
is due, a blank over-the-counter
coupon (Form 8109B) may be
obtained from an area office or
service center.
-
When a Form 8109B is requested,
the taxpayer’s name and Taxpayer
Identification Number (TIN) must
be manually entered on the form
by the dispensing IRS office.
This form requests the same
information as the Form 8109
(i.e., MFT, Tax Period, amount
of deposit).
-
AUTOGEN
-
The FTD Coupon Book contains, on
the sixth and seventh coupon,
Form ID Number
"91 and
92" . These special
ID numbers systemically activate
a reorder request of a FTD
Coupon Book.
-
When the "91" and/or "92" has
been input, Transaction Code 016
posts to the taxpayer’s account,
and the computer does an
analysis to determine whether or
not to generate a FTD reorder
request. The decision is based
on the FTD posting activity on
the most recent tax accounts.
-
An "FTD ADDRESS CHANGE FORM" is
included in the FTD Coupon Book.
Taxpayers complete the form and
submit it to the service center
to request that FTD Coupon Books
be sent to a different mailing
address. The FTD Coupon Book no
longer contains a FTD "REMINDER"
Form. In its place is an
additional FTD Coupon which
increased the number of FTD
Coupons from 23 to 24 per book.
The FTD Database has been
expanded to include the "Date
the FTD Coupon Book was
generated" .
20.1.4.1.3.7 (07-15-1998)
Immediate Credit Items
-
Deposits made with the FRB or branch
serving the taxpayer’s geographic
area, must be cash, postal money
order, Treasury Bill, or a certified
or Cashier’s check that the FRB
considers an immediate credit item.
The FRB dates the FTD on the day of
receipt, or day of receipt of funds.
-
Deposits made with other than
immediate credit items referenced
above are dated by the receiving FRB
when the funds are collected.
20.1.4.1.3.8 (09-10-1999)
Depositing by Mail
- When
taxpayers not subject to EFTPS,
deposit by mail, the Internal
Revenue Code (IRC section 7502(e))
provides conditions for timely
mailed/timely paid FTDs.
-
Consider the deposit as timely,
regardless of the "received
date-stamp" , if a taxpayer meets
the following conditions:
-
The taxpayer proves that the
deposit was mailed in the U.S.
at least two days before the due
date,
-
the depositary or FRB which
received the FTD is in the
taxpayer’s geographic location,
and
-
the deposit is under $20,000,
for taxpayers required to
deposit more than once a month.
- The
timely mailed/timely paid provision
does not apply when:
-
the taxpayer mails the deposit
to an incorrect FRB,
-
the payment is not an immediate
credit item, or
-
the taxpayer is a foreign
employer.
- To
meet timeliness requirements,
foreign employers must:
-
make arrangements with a U.S.
depositary to accept the
taxpayer’s wire transfer of
deposit and prepare an FTD
coupon for the customer, or
-
mail the FTD coupon and a
payment instrument in U.S.
dollars, to a FRB to arrive on
or before the deposit due date.
- See
IRM 20.1.4.14 for information to
resolve deposit date problems.
20.1.4.1.3.9 (09-10-1999)
Magnetic Tape (Mag Media)
-
Reporting agents (commercial
tax/payroll data processing
businesses) may use this method to
submit FTD payment information.
Agents who wish to submit
information on magnetic tape must
file a "Letter of Application" with
one of the Directors of the Internal
Revenue Service Centers where the
deposits will be processed.
-
Approval is given to those agents
who satisfy all the requirements for
the FTD Program.
-
If depositing for a Form 1041,
the taxpayer must have a minimum
of 50 clients to voluntarily use
Mag Tape. However, if it has
over 200 clients it is required
to use Mag Tape.
-
Rev Proc. 89–48 sets up the
minimum number of clients
necessary to use Mag Tape for
other tax returns.
-
Magnetic tape is a non-paper
process. Rather than submit multiple
individual coupon forms, mag tape
transfers the deposit information on
the coupons to tape. The actual
payment is forwarded to a depositary
with a completed Form 2284, Advice
of Credit (AOC).
-
Magnetic Media deposits are
identified as follows:
-
An 8
or 9
as the third digit in the
microfilm serial number (MSN)
identifies the return for which
the deposit is being made.
-
The last four digits of the MSN
are the reporting agent’s
assigned code (see Exhibit
20.1.4–2).
- The
service center (Accounting FTD
Function) that processes the
reporting agent’s mag tapes can
provide microfiche copies of the FTD
record.
20.1.4.1.4 (07-15-1998)
Who Assesses
-
Service Center Tax Examiners assess
the penalty on returns received in the
service centers.
-
Taxpayer Service Representatives
(TSRs), Collection Tax Examiners, and
Revenue Officers may recommend
assessment or non-assessment of the
penalty on secured returns. When there
is indication that a taxpayer filed in
a previous quarter but no current
return is on file, the Service
contacts the taxpayer and requests a
return. A return obtained in this
manner is a "secured" return.
-
Examination Tax Auditors and Revenue
Agents, Collection, TE/GE, and
Employment Tax Examiners make penalty
assertion determinations on examined
and/or secured returns.
20.1.4.1.5 (09-10-1999)
Restrictions on Assessments
- For
information regarding restrictions on
assessment see LEM 20.1.4.1. 5.1.
20.1.4.1.5.1 (09-10-1999)
Federal Agencies
-
According to Policy Statement P–2–4,
the IRS does not assert penalties
against Federal Agencies.
20.1.4.1.5.2 (09-10-1999)
State and Local Health and Welfare
- In
September 1997, IRS determined that
the state and local government
Health and Welfare agencies are not
subject to FTD deposit requirements.
They need only to make payments by
the due date of the return. Payment
(s) does not have to be deposited.
-
These agencies assume responsibility
for reporting and paying FICA and
FUTA and any withheld income tax
with the respect to individuals
furnished by the agency to provide
domestic services (Chore Workers)
for recipients of public assistance.
- Do
not assess any FTD penalties on
these entities. In addition, abate
the penalty, on modules (for all
years) with an unreversed FTD
penalty, when working other issues
on these modules.
20.1.4.2
(09-10-1999)
Failure-to-Deposit Penalty Rate
- The FTD
Penalty is charged for any failure to
deposit correctly. The three components
of a correct deposit are that it is made
timely, in the correct amount, and in
the correct manner.
- A
failure to comply with any of these
components will subject the deposit
to an FTD Penalty.
-
Because there may be multiple
deposits (with each individual
deposit subject to scrutiny for
compliance) on any one account, the
FTD Penalty that is assessed on the
account will be a sum of the
"time-sensitive" penalty(ies) and/or
the "avoidance" penalty(ies).
- The FTD
Penalty rate changed several times in
recent years. Therefore, the percentage
rate charged depends on the following:
- The
tax period involved,
- the
number of days a deposit is late,
and
-
whether it involves a direct
payment.
20.1.4.2.1 (09-10-1999)
Time Sensitive Portion of the FTD
Penalty
-
For deposits required after December
31, 1989,
there is a four tier penalty system
(see Exhibit 20.1.4–4). The penalty
rate assessed depends on the number of
days a deposit is late, as shown
below:
-
2 percent
for deposits
1—5 days late,
-
5 percent
for deposits
6—15 days late,
-
10 percent
for all direct payments and those
deposits made
more than 15 days late,
but paid on or before the 10th day
following notice and demand.
-
15 percent
(actually, a 5 percent addition to
the 10 percent for late payment in
(c) above) for all undeposited
taxes still unpaid after the 10th
day following the first balance
due notice or the day on which
notice and demand for immediate
payment is given.
-
Due to late enactment of the four
tier penalty system, special
penalty rates were in effect for
the periods ending March 31, 1990
(9003) through March 31, 1991
(9103). See LEM 20.1.4.2.1.
- For
penalties assessed
after October 25, 1986 (including
cycle 8644) and before January 1, 1990,
the penalty rate is 10 percent.
- For
returns assessed
prior to October 26, 1986 (prior to
Cycle 8644) the penalty
rate is 5 percent.
- See
LEM 20.1.4.2.1.
20.1.4.2.2 (09-10-1999)
Deposits
-
Internal Revenue Regulations state
that deposits are
due on or before the deposit due
date. This due date is the
last day the deposit can be considered
timely. However, taxpayers may make
their deposit any time between the
payroll liability incurred date and
the deposit due date. They are not
required to wait until the due date
nor will they receive a penalty for
making deposits prior to the due
date.For Form 720, see 20.1.4.8 of
this handbook.
-
Deposits are due only on days that are
not a Saturday, Sunday or Federal
Holiday unless there are specific
instructions to the contrary contained
in the Regulations written for those
specific types of taxes. For Form 720,
see 20.1.4.8 of this handbook.
- If the
deposit due date is a Saturday, Sunday
or a statewide legal holiday in
District of Columbia, or a state where
the deposit is required to be made,
the due date is extended to the next
day that is not a Saturday, Sunday or
holiday. For Form 720, see 20.1.4.8 of
this handbook.
- These
same regulations also state the
deposits are due only on
banking days.
In addition to Federal and state bank
holidays, Saturdays and Sundays are
treated as nonbanking days. For Form
720, see 20.1.4.8 of this handbook.
-
Taxpayers are required to deposit
their taxes with an authorized
depositary. Taxpayers avoid the FTD
system when they make payments to
other than an authorized depositary.
This type of noncompliance is called
FTD avoidance and is subject to an FTD
penalty.
-
Effective October 17, 1995, any
non-EFT deposit made by a
mandated
taxpayer is subject to the 10 percent
(direct deposit) penalty for not being
made in the correct manner. The
EFT/FTD penalty (referred to as the
Avoidance Penalty) may now be assessed
against any deposit required to be
made after
October 16, 1995.
- Refer
to LEM 20.1.4.2.1 and LEM
20.1.4.10.4.2, to determine the
appropriate deposit penalty rate for
periods ending after December 31, 1989
( 198912) through March 31, 1991
(199103).
-
Payments made to an unauthorized
depositary include those made directly
to IRS. Transaction code (TC) 670
identifies direct payments and
generally indicates that an FTD
avoidance penalty applies. There are
exceptions.
-
All TC 670 transmitted by EFT are
treated as correctly deposited
(effective March 1997).
-
FEDWIRE payments, made by CT–1
filers, are listed as TC 670 with
blocking series 700.
-
Taxpayers in bankruptcy may be
ordered by the court to make
payments directly to the IRS. In
such cases, the FTD avoidance
penalty would not apply. If the
account has a bankruptcy
indicator, TC 520, closing code
(CC) 85–89 with freeze code -V
or
TC 520, CC 81 with freeze code -W,
contact the appropriate Special
Procedures function to determine
if the taxpayer is under court
order to make direct payments.
-
Any TC 670 received after the
return has posted (in response to
a notice/bill) will not have the
avoidance penalty assessed against
it. If the taxpayer files the
return with a balance owing (has
not deposited sufficiently), the
notice sent will include the
maximum FTD penalty. Payments for
delinquent taxes are not to be
remitted with a coupon.
-
Regulations require certain taxes to
be paid using deposits. Payments made
in a manner other than a deposit may
be subject to the penalty. An FTD
avoidance penalty may apply in the
situations listed below. De minimis:
-
Form 941, 943, 945—Effective July
1, 1998, if the TC 150 is $1000 or
more, any amount paid with the
return is subject to the
advoidance penalty. Prior to July
1, 1998,if the TC 150 is $500 or
more, any amount paid with the
return is subject to the avoidance
penalty.
- A
safe harbor shortfall (of any
amount) originating from a
monthly
depositor may be
paid
with the return without an
avoidance penalty.
- A
safe harbor shortfall (of any
amount) originating from a
semi-weekly
depositor must be
deposited.
-
Form 940—If the TC 150 is less
than $100, any amount paid with
the return is
not subject to the
avoidance penalty.
-
Form 720—If the amount from Form
720, Part I is over $2,000, the
amount paid with the return may be
subject to the avoidance penalty ,
unless a safe harbor Rule applies.
-
Forms CT–1—(199303) and
subsequent)—If the TC 150 is more
than $500, any amount paid with
the return may be subject to the
avoidance penalty. (199212 and
before)—If the amount paid with
the return exceeds $100, it is
subject to the avoidance penalty.
20.1.4.2.3 (09-10-1999)
Deposit Due Dates
- The
deposit due dates are determined by
the deposit requirements, which vary
according to the tax form involved and
the amount of tax.
- Before
determining the deposit due dates see
Exhibits 20.1. 4–5 and LEM 20.1.4.2.2.
For Form 720, see 20.1.4.8 of this
IRM.
20.1.4.2.4 (07-15-1998)
Banking Day
- Once a
bank is recognized by the Federal
Reserve Bank (FRB) and considered an
authorized financial institution, it
can accept tax deposits.
- The
FRB has established 2:00 p.m. as the
federal banking day’s closing time.
- Banks
may be open for business (for the
convenience of their customers) later
than the regulated bank day cut-off.
- A bank
may have lobby/drive-through hours
until 4:00 p.m. However, you may
notice postings such as
"All deposits
made after 2:00 p.m. will be credited
to the next business day."
For example:
-
Taxpayer A has a deposit due on
Wednesday. His bank, an authorized
financial institution, has 3:00
p.m. as its banking day cut-off
time. This bank has lobby hours
Monday through Friday until 5:30
p.m.
-
Taxpayer A makes his FTD deposit
at 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday. The
bank teller’s stamp on his FTD
coupon, Form 8109, will reflect
receipt of this deposit on
Thursday’s business day. The
teller’s stamp may carry
additional information, such as,
the time and date received or a
designation of the calendar day
the deposit was received, if this
day is different from the business
day received.
-
The Advice of Credit (AOC) and the
IRS TC 650 posting date would
carry Thursday’s date. This
taxpayer will be subject to a 2%
FTD penalty for being one day
late.
- The
example above is not one of a misdated
deposit, unless the bank held the
deposit. In the example above, a
misdated deposit would be evidenced by
the coupon carrying the Thursday’s
date, but the AOC would show a date
for Friday or later. See IRM 20.1.4.14
for more information on misdated
deposits.
- FMS
Regulations extend only to the
stamping and acceptance of the coupon
and the AOC. What and how much
information is contained on the
taxpayer’s receipt from the bank
varies from bank to bank.
- In
example in (4) above, the taxpayer’s
receipt could, in fact, be stamped
with the Wednesday calendar date,
while the coupon is, also correctly,
stamped with the Thursday business
date. In these cases if there is also
a time stamp, and it gives any
indication of being past a normal bank
business day cut off time, it is still
the taxpayers responsibility (the
burden of proof rests with the
taxpayer) to prove (with a statement
from the bank) that the payment was
made on the correct day.
20.1.4.2.5 (07-15-1998)
Bank Holidays
- Bank
holidays are days authorized by the
individual states banking regulations
for banks within their state to be
closed. Banks don’t have to close on
these days but are allowed by the
state controlling authority to be
closed for business if they choose to
do so.
-
though not all state recognize
bank holidays, some state
authorize several days
-
IRM Part III lists bank holidays
by state.
-
Both Master file and IDRS are
programmed to recognize state bank
holidays. See discussion on the
State Code at 20.1.4.11.
20.1.4.2.6 (09-10-1999)
Application of Payments
-
Payments are identified on Master File
as follows:
- TC
610—Payment received with a
return—depending on the reason for
the payment with the return, this
payment may be liable for the
avoidance portion of the FTD
penalty.
- TC
670–Subsequent payment—See IRM
20.1.4.13. and LEM 20.1.4.2.3 for
possible FTD avoidance penalty.
- TC
650–Federal Tax Deposit,
- TC
700—Credit Applied,
- TC
760—Substantiated Credit Payment
Allowance,
- TC
710—Overpayment Credit Applied
from Prior Tax Period,
- TC
716—Generated Overpayment Applied
from Prior Tax Period,
- If the
TC 716 Credit Availability Date is not
present (e.g., on CP 194, BMFOL,
etc.), TC 716 will apply the credit
against the
first liability for the
period.
- On a
credit transfer, the TC 710 will apply
against the
first liability for the
period.
- For
periods after
March 31, 1991, apply
deposits in date-made order against
deposit liabilities in due-date order.
This is referred to as the FIFO (first
in, first out) method of assigning
deposits to liabilities. For Special
Rules for Form 720, see 20.1.4.8.8 of
this IRM.
-
Accordingly, apply deposits
(deposit, payment, credit) in
date-made order to the first
liability (in due date order)
within the same return period.
Satisfy the
oldest liability first.
Liability age is determined by the
liabilities incurred date.
-
All credits will be arranged by
date order to determine the next
available credit. The Credit type
(the origin of the credit) does
not affect its date-made order.
However, an avoidance penalty may
not be appropriate. For example:
A taxpayer
has liabilities of $1,000 in
April, May and June. The taxpayer
is required to deposit monthly and
makes timely deposits of $1,000 of
May 15, June 15 and July 15. A
direct payment of $3,000 is
received on April 7 and is applied
to this quarter. An incorrect
manner (avoidance penalty) may not
be an appropriate penalty in this
situation.
-
Effective April 1, 1991, the
amount required to be deposited is
determined by (100% of) the
liability amount and not the
undeposited amount.
-
Exception: For tax periods
beginning April
1, 1991 through December 31, 1991,
(199106, 199109, 199112).
Where a penalty was computed using the
FIFO method and the taxpayer submitted
documentation showing the
intent
(e.g. a missing deposit or correcting
a liability period) that a specific
deposit was for a specific liability
period, recompute the penalty
considering the
taxpayer’s intent. Taxpayer
intent should be considered only for
this period of time.
- For
periods ending
March 31, 1991, and prior,
apply timely deposits to the liability
for that deposit period. Apply any
remaining credit to any earlier
under-deposit within the same return
period. Then, carry any remaining
credit forward to apply to the next
liability within the same return
period. See LEM 20.1.4.3.3.
20.1.4.3
(09-10-1999)
Form 941 Series
- The Form
941, Employers Quarterly Federal Tax
Return, is a quarterly tax return used
to report employment taxes. If an
employer accumulates less than a $1,000
tax liability during a return period, no
deposits are required. This amount may
be paid with a timely filed tax return.
Amounts of $1,000 or more must be
deposited.
-
Beginning January 1, 1993, taxpayers
follow a deposit schedule which
generally remains consistent throughout
the year.
- Prior to
January 1, 1993, the deposit due dates
and amounts could fluctuate because they
were both based on an accumulated dollar
amount.
- Under
either the old or new system, an
employer is not required to make a
deposit more often than a payroll is
made. However, 100 percent of the amount
required to be deposited is due on the
deposit due date unless the employer
meets one of the safe harbor exceptions.
- The
regulations provide that if taxes are
required to be deposited on any day that
is not a banking day, the taxes will be
treated as timely deposited if deposited
on the first banking day thereafter.
20.1.4.3.1 (09-10-1999)
Lookback Periods
- One of
the features of the new employment tax
deposit system, effective January 1,
1993, for IRC section 6302 provides
employers with up-front information in
determining their deposit obligations
and status. Rather than having to wait
until after the payroll has been paid
to determine when the deposit is due,
the employer, after one short analysis
a year, can determine the deposit
schedule to be generally followed for
the entire upcoming year. Exceptions
or circumstances that would change or
modify the deposit schedule, once
determined, have been held to a
minimum.
-
For tax periods beginning January 1,
1993 and later, an employer is either
a "monthly
depositor" or a
"semi-weekly
depositor" (see IRM
20.1.4.2) for a calendar year based on
an annual determination of the
aggregate amount of employment taxes
reported during the employer’s
"lookback period."
-
Forms 941—For quarterly return
filers, the
"lookback period" for
each calendar year is the twelve
month period ended the preceding
June 30. For example, the lookback
period for calendar year 1998 is
the period July 1, 1996 to June
30, 1997 (which encompasses the
quarters ended 199609, 199612,
199703, and 199706).
-
Forms 943, 945 and CT–1—For annual
return filers, the
"lookback
period" is defined as
the second calendar year preceding
the current calendar year. For
example, the lookback period for
calendar year 1998 is calendar
year 1996.
-
Form 945—Because the Form 945 was
created in 1994, the form did not
have its own (MFT specific)
lookback period for the first two
years. Therefore, during calendar
years 1994 and 1995, the
"lookback
period" and deposit
status for Form 945 depositors is
the same as the taxpayer’s status
on January 1, 1994 for taxes
reported on
Form 941. The taxpayer
will generally retain that
depositor status for all of
calendar years 1994 and 1995.
- A new
employer is treated as having
employment tax liabilities of zero for
any quarter or year of the lookback
period during which the employer did
not exist.
-
Effective with the November, 1996
mailout, the deposit status
information notice (CP 136, 137, 137A
and 137B) will be sent to employers
only if their deposit status
(determined by the annual lookback
analysis) changed from the prior year.
Taxpayers should continue depositing
following the deposit schedule they
were last issued unless
-
informed otherwise by the service
or
-
their current circumstances
warrant a change (e.g., incurring
a $100,000 liability or
-
Taxpayer analysis of lookback
period.
- The
fact that the taxpayer and/or third
party did not receive a deposit
information notice in any of the
previous or subsequent years is not
grounds for granting a FTD Penalty
abatement. Sufficient information is
readily available (e.g., from Cir E)
for the taxpayer to determine the
appropriate lookback period and
whether the lookback threshold has
been met or exceeds and whether the
taxpayer has incurred any
extraordinary circumstances that would
affect the deposit schedule he is
currently following.
20.1.4.3.2 (07-15-1998)
Monthly Depositors
- If the
employer reported Employment Taxes of
$50,000 or less during the one year
lookback period, the employer is a
monthly depositor and generally must
deposit employment taxes on a monthly
basis during the calendar year.
-
Under the monthly rule, each
month’s taxes are required to be
deposited on or before the 15th
day of the following month.
- If
the 15th of the following month
falls on a Saturday, Sunday,
Federal or State legal holiday,
the employer will have until the
next banking day to make a timely
deposit.
-
Monthly depositors must enter the
Monthly Summary of Federal Tax
Liability on the face of the tax
return.
20.1.4.3.2.1 (07-15-1998)
Semi-weekly Depositors
- If
the employer reported Employment
Taxes of more than $50,000 during
the one year lookback period, the
employer must deposit using the
semi-weekly rules. Under this rule,
the day a deposit is due is
determined by the day of their
payroll.
-
The deposit for a pay date of
Wednesday, Thursday or Friday
must be made on or before the
following Wednesday.
-
The deposit for a pay date of
Saturday, Sunday, Monday or
Tuesday must be made on or
before the following Friday.
-
The semi-weekly rule does not
require an employer to make
deposits twice a week
(semi-weekly). Rather, the
deposits are due based on a
schedule which divides the
calendar week into two
(semi-weekly) sections.
-
The semi-weekly depositor must
submit a
Schedule B, Employer’s Record of
Federal Tax Liability.
-
Refer to exhibit 20.1.4–5, FTD
Due Date Chart.
- In
the case of a return period that
ends during a semi-weekly deposit
period, the employer may be required
to make two deposits. For example:
-
The second quarter return period
ends on Thursday and the third
quarter return period begins on
Friday.
-
If the employer had a payroll on
both Thursday and another on
Friday, this employer must make
two deposits:
one for the
deposit from the Thursday
payroll (second quarter), and
another
for the Friday payroll (third
quarter).
20.1.4.3.2.2 (09-10-1999)
Rule for semi-weekly non-banking
days
-
Treas. Reg. 31.6302–1(c)(2)(iii)
provides that all semi-weekly
depositors have at least three
banking days, following the close of
the semi-weekly period, to deposit
employment taxes accumulated during
the semi-weekly period.
-
Saturdays and Sundays were
considered in arriving at a due date
for semi-weekly deposit which would
allow at least three banking days.
However, because Federal holidays do
not fall on a regularly recurring
schedule throughout the calendar
year, the following procedures are
to be followed in determining the
due date:
-
For semi-weekly depositors, if
one or more of the intervening
days between the end of the
semi-weekly period and the due
date is a Federal or State legal
holiday, the deposit due date
will be extended by the same
number of days.
-
If the deposit due date for
semi-weekly depositors is a
Federal or State legal holiday,
the due date will be extended to
the next day that is not a
Saturday, Sunday, Federal or
State legal holiday. An example
would be if a deposit is due on
a Friday, but the Friday is a
Federal or State legal holiday,
the deposit would be timely if
made the following Monday.
20.1.4.3.2.3 (07-15-1998)
$100,000/One Day Rule
-
For deposit periods
on or after January 1, 1993,
taxes on Forms 941, 943, 945, and
CT–1 that reach $100,000, or more,
must be deposited within 1 banking
day for either the monthly or
semi-weekly depositor. See Exhibit
20.1.4–5 Cont.
-
A monthly
depositor who incurs a $100,000
or more tax liability
immediately becomes a
semi-weekly depositor for the
remainder of the current
calendar year and the following
calendar year (For example, if a
$100,000 tax liability is
incurred on Wednesday, taxpayer
becomes a semi-weekly depositor
on Thursday).
-
A
semi-weekly depositor
who incurs a $100,000 or greater
tax liability, will return to
the semi-weekly deposit schedule
the following day (For example,
if a $100,000 tax liability is
incurred on Wednesday, the
taxpayer returns to being a
semi-weekly depositor on
Thursday).
20.1.4.3.2.4 (09-10-1999)
1993 Transition Period Conversion
Rules
-
Employers were given a one-year
transition period to complete their
conversion to the 1993 rules. The
same rules will be applied to an
entire return period (one quarter).
The transition period expired on
December 31, 1993.
-
During this period, a late or
insufficient deposit(s) (according
to the 1993 rules) will not create
an assessable penalty if the account
is compliant under the 1992 rules.
-
Penalties will be assessed if the
account is not compliant with either
the 1992 or the 1993 rules.
- To
compute any penalty using the 1993
deposit rules and due dates,
analyze the
account using the guidelines in the
following example:
-
A semi-weekly employer has pay
days on Thursday (deposits are
due the following Wednesday).
The employer makes one of the
deposits on the following
Thursday.
-
For purposes of this example,
even after considering legal
holidays and other exceptions,
this deposit is late and creates
the possibility of a penalty on
this account.
-
However, because of the one year
transition period, before
assessing the 1993 penalty,
check to see if the account is
compliant under the 1992 rules.
-
Place the liabilities and
deposits into the 8th monthly
period schedule. If the analysis
of the deposits shows that all
deposits were made correctly
under the eighth-monthly period
schedule,
no further action is required.
If the analysis results in a
penalty, use the procedures
below to determine the
appropriate penalty amount.
-
Following the original regulations,
the penalty assessed was computed
strictly using the 1993 deposit
schedule. However, late in 1994,
Chief Counsel reviewed the
regulations and issued a Technical
Advice Letter to clarify the intent
of the regulations.
-
This clarification results in an
administrative procedural change
to the way the FTD penalty will
be computed for the transition
year.
-
For purposes of this transition
rule, at the first late deposit
under the 1993 rules, recompute
and assess the late penalty
using the 1992 due dates.
-
Adjust the FTD penalty only if
the penalty computed, using the
following procedures, is less
than the original assessed
penalty: FTDPN "C" to identify
where in the 1992 analysis the
penalty occurred. Enter FTDPN,
using only the liabilities and
deposits from the penalty
occurrence to determine the 1993
portion of the penalty.
-
Use the above guidelines to
respond to formal or informal
claims regarding the method of
computing penalties under the
1993 transition rules.
20.1.4.3.3 (07-15-1998)
Eighth-Monthly Periods
- For
tax periods ending on or before
December 31,
1992, each month of each
quarter is divided into eight periods
for deposit purposes ending on the
3rd, 7th, 11th, 15th, 19th, 22nd, 25th
and last day of the month. These are
called eighth-monthly periods and are
designated by alpha A through X on the
return.
- If the
quarterly tax liability is at least
$500, the taxpayer must list the tax
liability in the ROFT section. Compare
the information in the ROFT with the
deposit information to determine if
the taxpayer made timely and adequate
deposits. (See IRM 20.1.4.4.1 if the
ROFT is incomplete.)
-
Deposit requirements may vary from
month to month depending on the amount
of taxes withheld each payday. For
example, a taxpayer may be a monthly
depositor for the first two months of
a quarter, and then become an
eighth-monthly depositor in the third
month.
-
FTDs Received after December 31, 1989
through March 31, 1991, special rules
apply.
Refer to LEM 20.1.4.2.1 and LEM
20.1.4.10.4.2.
20.1.4.3.4 (07-15-1998)
Deposit Requirements
- For
tax periods
beginning on or after April 1, 1991,
the deposit requirements are not based
on undeposited tax amounts. Instead,
they are determined by the tax
liability accumulated during the
deposit period (monthly or
eighth-monthly). See Exhibit 20.1.4–1
of LEM 20.1.4.
- When
the tax liability is less than $500 at
the end of a month:
- If
the tax liability at the end of
the first or second month is under
$500, there is no deposit required
during the month the liability was
incurred. The amount is carried
over to the next month.
- If
the tax liability at the end of
the quarter is under $500, the tax
can be paid with the timely filed
Form 941, or deposited by return
due date.
- When
the tax liability is $500 or more but
less than $3,000 at the end of any
month:
- If
the tax liability at the end of a
month is $500 or more, but less
than $3,000, it must be deposited
by the 15th day of the following
month.
-
EXCEPTION:
When an eighth-monthly deposit of
$3,000 or more is required in the
first or second month of the
quarter and the taxpayer incurs a
subsequent liability of less than
$3,000 during the same month, the
taxpayer must carry the tax
liability under $3,000 to the next
month. If it is the last month of
the quarter, the taxes under
$3,000 must be deposited by the
return due date.
-
When the tax liability is $3,000
or more at the end of any
eighth-monthly period, the taxes
must be deposited within 3 banking
days after the close of that
eighth-monthly period.
-
When the $100,000
Rule applies, see IRM
20.1.4.3.2.3.
20.1.4.3.4.1 (09-10-1999)
March 31, 1991 and Prior
- For
tax periods
ending on or before March 31, 1991,
the deposit requirements are based
on the amount of the liability
(undeposited tax) at the end of the
deposit period (monthly or
eighth-monthly). See LEM 20.1.4.3.3.
- When
UNDEPOSITED TAXES are less than $500
at the end of a month:
-
If at the end of the first or
second month the amount is under
$500, no deposit is required for
this liability period. The
amount is carried over into the
next month.
-
If at the end of the quarter the
amount is under $500, the
undeposited taxes may be paid
with the timely filed Form 941,
or deposited by the return due
date.
- When
UNDEPOSITED TAXES are $500 or more
but less than $3,000 at the end of
any month:
-
If at the and of a month the
amount is $500 or more, but less
than $3,000, the taxes must be
deposited by the 15th day of the
following month.
-
EXCEPTION: When an
eighth-monthly deposit of $3,000
or more is required in the first
or second month of the quarter
and the taxpayer incurs a
subsequent liability of less
than $3,000 during the same
month, the taxpayer must carry
the tax liability under $3,000
to the next month. If it is the
last month of the quarter, the
taxes (under $3,000) must be
deposited by the return due
date.
- When
UNDEPOSITED TAXES are $3,000 or more
at the end of any eighth-monthly
period:
-
If at the end of an
eighth-monthly period the amount
is $3,000 or more, deposit the
taxes within 3 banking days
after the close of that
eighth-monthly period.
-
For First Time Exception to the
eighth-monthly deposit
requirements, see IRM 20.1.4.2.
-
When the $100,000
Rule applies, see IRM
20.1.4.3.2.3of this handbook.
20.1.4.3.5 (07-15-1998)
Safe Harbor
March 31, 1993 and Later
- Safe
Harbor— For tax
periods ending on or after March 31,
1993.
- No
penalty is assessed if:
-
Any deposit shortfall does not
exceed the greater of $100 or 2%
of the amount of taxes otherwise
required to be deposited, and
-
The deposit shortfall is paid or
deposited by the shortfall makeup
date. The deposit due date for the
shortfall depends upon whether the
taxpayer is a monthly or
semi-weekly depositor.
- The
shortfall make-up date for monthly
depositors is the due date for the
return period in which the
underpayment occurs.
- The
shortfall make-up date for
semi-weekly/one day rule depositors
is:
-
falling on or after the 15th day
of the month, following the month
in which the deposit was required
to be made,
or
- if
earlier, the due date for the
return period. For example: for
the liability period ending June
28, 1994, the deposit due date
falls on July 6, 1994, and the
safe harbor shortfall amount would
be due July 31, 1994.
-
Taxpayers do not have to apply Safe
Harbor provisions to all deposits in a
specific tax period. They may apply
the provisions to certain deposits,
while paying 100 percent of the
others.
- Use of
the safe harbor option does not change
the order in which payments are
applied or liabilities are satisfied.
The impact of deposit periods must
still be recognized when analyzing the
funds deposited by the taxpayer and in
determining which liability is to be
satisfied first by the funds deposited
by the taxpayer.
-
Satisfying a liability before
going on to the next means
matching deposits, payments and/or
credits to 100% or an appropriate
safe harbor amount of the
liability.
-
For each liability, full
satisfaction (100%) of liability
or safe harbor satisfaction is
computed after consideration of
all monies deposited on the same
date.
20.1.4.3.5.1 (07-15-1998)
Safe Harbor December 31, 1992 and
Prior
- Safe
Harbor/95 Percent Rule—For tax
periods ending
on or before December 31, 1992.
Under the 95 percent rule, a
taxpayer required to make deposits
under the $3,000 or $100,000 Rule
can deposit less than the full
deposit amount and not be subject to
an FTD penalty.
-
Taxpayers can indicate that they
used the Safe Harbor provisions by
checking the applicable box on the
return or by attaching written
correspondence to the return. The
Safe Harbor provision may apply
whether or not the box is checked if
the taxpayer:
-
Timely deposits at least 95
percent of the liability, and
-
pays the remaining underpayment
(5 percent) according to the
following: Deposits the
underpayment from the first or
second month of the quarter with
or before the first deposit due
after the 15th day of the
following month. If the
underpaid amount is $500 or more
and no other deposits are due
after the 15th day of the
following month, deposits the
underpayment by the return due
date. If the underpaid amount is
less than $500, it can be paid
with a timely filed return.
Deposits the underpayment of
$500 or more from the last month
of a quarter by the return due
date or pays the underpayment of
less than $500 with the timely
filed return. For periods ending
after March 31, 1991, see LEM
20.1.4.3.5.
-
Taxpayers do not have to apply
the Safe Harbor provisions to
all deposits in a specific tax
period. They may apply the
provisions to certain deposits,
while paying 100 percent of the
others.
-
Backup Withholding. Instructions for
backup withholding deposits are
found in IRM 20.1.
20.1.4.3.5.2 (09-10-1999)
First Time Exception
-
First Time Exception—For tax periods
ending on or
before December 31, 1992.
The first time a taxpayer has a tax
liability of $3,000 or more at the
end of an eighth-monthly period, the
taxpayer may deposit the taxes by
the 15th day of the following month,
instead of depositing them by the
third banking day. See LEM
20.1.4.3.5.
- The
taxpayer may claim the First Time
Exception by marking the return (
"If you are a First Time
3-banking-day depositor, check here"
). The taxpayer may also claim the
First Time Exception in
correspondence.
- The
first time exception applies only if
the taxpayer meets the following
conditions:
-
The current undeposited taxes
are under $10,000. (The First
Time Exception does not apply to
amounts of $10,000 or more).
-
The taxpayer was not required to
deposit $3,000 or more in any
earlier eighth-monthly period in
the quarter.
-
The taxpayer was not required to
deposit $3,000 or more in any
eighth-monthly period during the
four prior quarters. Research
the 4 prior quarters only if the
taxpayer meets the conditions in
1 and 2 above.
- When
the First Time Exception applies:
-
Exclude the first eighth-monthly
liability (and its payment), if
made by the 15th day of the
following month).
-
Compute FTD penalty on any other
late or direct payments which
may exist.
- If
the taxpayer does not qualify for
the First Time Exception, compute
the penalty without regard to this
provision.
-
Beginning with period ending
December 31, 1988, on IDRS the
literal "3-DAY" appears in the
account record.
-
If Master File identifies a
3-banking-day requirement
anytime during a quarter, a "1"
displays for that module (tax
period).
-
When verifying the 4 prior
quarters, if there is a "1" in
the "3 DAY" field, the taxpayer
was previously required to make
a deposit of $3,000 or more.
-
Therefore, the taxpayer does not
qualify for the First Time
Exception in the current
quarter.
20.1.4.4
(07-15-1998)
Computation of FTD Penalty Form 941
Series
- For tax
periods beginning
on or after January 1, 1993,
refer to Form 941 deposit requirements.
See Exhibit 20.1.4–8.
- To
determine if a deposit is timely,
see Exhibit 20.1.4–5.
-
Compare the taxpayer’s liability,
using the information from the ROFT,
with the deposits made. If the ROFT
information is unavailable or does
not match the net tax, use the
averaging method.
- If
there is a discrepancy of the ROFT
that is due to a line item
adjustment (for 9312 and prior—lines
4, 9, and 12, and for 9403 and
subsequent—lines 4 and 9), adjust
the last liability regardless of the
dollar amount.
-
When the $100,000
Rule applies, see IRM 20.1.4.3.2.3.
20.1.4.4.1 (07-15-1998)
December 31, 1992 and Prior
- For
tax periods
ending on or before December 31, 1992,
refer to Form 941 deposit requirements
IRM 20.1.4.2. See Exhibit 20.1.4–7.
- Refer
to Exhibit 20.1.4–5 of LEM 20.1.4 to
determine timely deposits. Compare the
taxpayer’s ROFT liability with the
deposits made. If ROFT figures are
unavailable, use the averaging method.
- If
there is an overstatement of the
ROFT that is due to a line item
adjustment (Lines 4, 9 and 12 on
Form 941), adjust the last
liability regardless of the dollar
amount. Then compute the penalty.
- If
the taxpayer reports only monthly
totals in the ROFT, and any
monthly total is $3,000 or more,
consider the liability not
furnished and average the entire
tax liability; every monthly total
is less than $3,000, consider the
monthly liabilities attributable
to the last period of each month;
When the
$100,000 Rule applies, see IRM
20.1.4.3.2.3.
20.1.4.4.2 (07-15-1998)
Averaged Penalty
-
Average the tax settlement amount when
the Record of Federal Tax (ROFT) is
incomplete or blank. Apply deposits to
the resulting averaged liabilities.
- The
tax settlement amount equals the tax
liability amount reduced by the amount
of any refundable credit allowance (TC
150 less TC 766).
20.1.4.4.2.1 (07-15-1998)
On or After January 1, 1993
- For
tax periods
beginning on or after January 1,
1993, the method of
averaging will depend on the type of
depositor and the information
available.
- To
compute an averaged liability for a
monthly
depositor who has not provided any
liability breakdown:
-
Divide the net tax by three (3),
and
-
Assign the resulting liabilities
to each of the monthly totals.
- To
compute an averaged liability for a
semi-weekly
depositor who has not provided any
liability breakdown:
-
Divide the net tax liability by
12, and
-
Assign that amount to the first
4 Wednesdays of the month.
- To
compute an averaged liability for a
semi-weekly
depositor who provides entries for
the monthly ROFT:
-
Divide each month’s tax
liability by four (4), then,
-
Assign the resulting amount for
each month to the first four (4)
Wednesdays of that month.
20.1.4.4.2.2 (07-15-1998)
On or before December 31, 1992
- For
tax periods
ending on or before December 31,
1992, divide the tax
settlement amount by 12.
-
Consider the results as the tax
liability amounts for the following
eighth monthly periods B, D, F, H,
J, L, N, P, R, T, V, and X.
-
Apply deposits to the resulting
averaged liabilities.
20.1.4.4.2.3 (07-15-1998)
On or after September 30, 1990
- For
periods ending
on or after September 30, 1990:
-
If the averaged liability equals
$100,000 or more,
-
assign the liability to the
first day of the eighth-monthly
periods B, D, F, H, J, L, N, P,
R, T, V, and X.
20.1.4.4.3 (09-10-1999)
Backup Withholding (BUWH)
-
Taxpayers are required to backup
withhold (BUWH) on nonpayroll items.
Tax period ending December 31, 1993
(129312), is the last quarter in which
backup withholding is reported on Form
941/941E. All non-payroll items have
been removed from Form 941, effective
January 1, 1994.
- For
tax periods
ending on or before December 31, 1993,
taxpayers reported BUWH amounts on
Line 11, Form 941, or Line 9, Form
941E.
-
Taxpayers who elected to report and
deposit BUWH separately from other
taxes, used Form 941, Schedule A to
separately list the BUWH liabilities.
- If
taxpayers choose the election, the
separate BUWH deposits are identified
by Tax Class 5.
- If it
was the employer’s practice to treat
the two taxes separately (e.g., two
separate deposits for the different
types of taxes) the employer may
follow separate deposit schedules.
Thus, an employer with a combined
total liability of over $50,000 could
be required to deposit under the
monthly rules, semi-weekly rules or a
combination of both.
- If it
was not the employer’s practice to
separate the two taxes for deposit and
reporting purposes, the employer would
have only one lookback period
consisting of the combined employment
and backup withholding liability.
- The
regulations for
reporting backup
withholding (BUWH) have not changed
for 1993. The regulations for
depositing
backup withholding (BUWH) did change.
See Nonpayroll Taxes.
- Form
941, Schedule A (Record of Federal
Backup Withholding Tax Liability) is
obsolete for tax periods after
December 31, 1993.
20.1.4.5
(07-15-1998)
Nonpayroll Taxes Form 945
-
Effective with the first quarter of
1994:
- All
non-payroll items have been removed
from Form 941.
- New
Form 945, Annual Return of Withheld
Federal Income Tax, is used to
report nonpayroll items. Nonpayroll
items include pensions, annuities,
and Individual Retirement Accounts
(IRAs), military retirement pay,
gambling winnings, deferred income,
and backup withholding (BUWH).
-
Beginning January 1,
1994,
effective for payroll and nonpayroll
items after December 31, 1993, the
payroll items on Form 941 and the
nonpayroll items on Form 945 must be
deposited
separately.
- As a
general rule, all income tax
withholding reported on Forms 1099
(e.g., Form 1099-R or Form
1099-MISC) or Form W-2G must be
reported on Form 945.
- Form
941E (Quarterly Return of Withheld
Federal Income Tax and Medicare Tax)
is now
obsolete. Form 941E
filers will report Employment Taxes
and withholding from wages on Form
941, and nonpayroll items on Form
945.
- The
deposit requirements for Form 945 will
parallel the Form 941 deposit
requirements that became effective
January 1, 1993. See IRM 20.1.4.3.2.
-
The
$100,000 Rule for accumulated
liabilities also applies to the Form 945.
See IRM 20.1.4.3.2.3.
- For
Calendar Years 1994 and 1995, the Form
945 deposit requirements (monthly or
semi-weekly) are determined by the Form
941 depositor status that applied for
calendar year 1994.
- For
Calendar Year 1996, the Form 945 deposit
requirement will be determined by the
Form 945 lookback period. The lookback
period is the second year preceding the
current calendar year. For example, for
calendar year 1996, the Form 945
lookback year is 1994.
20.1.4.5.1 (07-15-1998)
BUWH/FTD Penalty Computation
- The
penalty computation for Form 945 will
parallel the FTD penalty computation
for Form 941.
- The
Form 945–A, Record of Federal Tax
Liability, provides the liability
breakdown for the Form 945.
20.1.4.5.2 (09-10-1999)
On or before 9312
- For
tax periods
ending on or before December 31, 1993,
backup withholding was reported on
Form 941.
- Before
computing an FTD penalty, determine
whether the taxpayer intended to:
-
Combine BUWH with social security
and withheld income taxes (ROFT
with no Schedule A), or
-
treat it as a separate tax (ROFT
and a Schedule A).
- If
the taxpayer’s intent is not
clear, contact the taxpayer for
clarification.
- If the
return has a Schedule A, add the
Schedule A total with the ROFT that is
reporting income tax withholding and
Social Security taxes (e.g., the
monthly total from the face of the
Form 941, or the total from Schedule
B, Employer’s Record of Federal Tax
Liability).
- If the
combined total of the Form 941,
Schedule A, and the ROFTs
are
within a certain amount (see LEM
20.1.4.4.1) of the net taxes reported
on Form 941, this is a good ROFT.
- If the
combined total of the ROFTs
are not
within a certain amount (see LEM
20.1.4.4.1) of Form 941 net taxes,
take the following actions:
- If
the taxpayer
combined deposits:
average the tax settlement amount
(TC 150 less TC 766) and compute
the penalty, or if the Schedule A
includes credit
(negative) amounts
and the taxpayer did not make
separate deposits, average the
entire tax liability.
- If
the taxpayer made
separate
deposits, make separate
computations as follows: Make one
computation using the figures from
the ROFT on Form 941 or Schedule
B, and one computation using the
figures on Schedule A. Combine
penalty amounts. Input one TC 180
for the total amount. Attach both
computation sheets to the return
as part of the case file. See LEM
20.1.4.1.5.1.
20.1.4.5.3 (07-15-1998)
Form 945 Administrative Error
Adjustments
- A
taxpayer will report an adjustment to
Form 945 on Form 941c, Supporting
Statement To Correct Information, or
an equivalent statement and file it
with Form 945 to provide the necessary
background information on the
adjustment(s).
-
Adjustments cannot be made on Form 945
to correct income tax withholding or
backup withholding reported in a prior
calendar year unless it is to correct
an
administrative error.
- An
administrative error is any error
that does not change the amount of
income tax that was actually
withheld or deducted from a payee.
-
For example, if the total income
tax actually withheld was
incorrectly reported because of a
mathematical or transposition
error, this is an administrative
error.
-
Taxpayers must report an
adjustment to correct an
administrative error on Form 945
in the year in which the error was
discovered.
- A
taxpayer’s adjustment(s) to correct a
prior period administrative error must
either increase or decrease the total
taxes on Form 945, Line 1, by the
amount of the net adjustment
(including adjustments to income tax
withholding and
backup withholding). The taxpayer
should identify the adjustment in Part
V of Form 941c as correcting an
administrative error and provide a
description of the error(s).
20.1.4.6
(07-15-1998)
Form 943 Series
- Form
943, Employer’s Annual Tax Return for
Agricultural Employees, is an annual
return used to report social security
and income taxes withheld for
agricultural employees.
- Although
an annual return, Form 943 deposit
requirements are generally the same as
the Form 941 deposit requirements.
20.1.4.6.1 (09-10-1999)
On or After July 1, 1998
- If the
employer accumulates less than $1,000
tax liability during a year, no
deposits are required.
- The
deposit requirements depend on the tax
liability incurred.
20.1.4.6.2 (09-10-1999)
On or after January 1, 1993
- If the
employer accumulates less than $500
tax liability during a year, no
deposits are required.
- The
deposit requirements depend on the tax
liability incurred.
- To
show the correct liability for the tax
periods
beginning on or after January 1, 1993,
the taxpayer must list the tax
liability as follows:
- If
the employer is classified as a
monthly depositor (the lookback
period is $50,000 or less), the
employer must list the tax
liability in the Form 943 ROFT.
- If
the employer is classified as a
semi-weekly depositor (lookback
period is $50,000 or more), the
taxpayer must list the tax
liability on Form 943A.
20.1.4.6.3 (09-10-1999)
On or before December 31, 1992
- If the
employer accumulated less than $500
tax liability during a year, no
deposits were required.
- To
show the correct liability for tax
periods ending
on or before December 31, 1992:
- If
the annual tax liability is at
least $500, the taxpayer must list
the tax liability in the Form 943
ROFT section.
- If
any month’s tax liability is
$3,000 or more, the taxpayer must
complete Form 943A ROFT and attach
it to the Form 943.
-
When the $100,000 Rule applies,
see IRM 20.1.4.3.2.3. Since
Schedule B covers only one
quarter, an agricultural employer
may need to attach four Schedules
B to Form 943.
-
Deposit requirements may vary from
month to month, depending on the
amount of taxes withheld each
payday. E.g., a taxpayer may be a
monthly depositor for the first 11
months of the year and then become
an eighth-monthly depositor in the
last month.
20.1.4.6.4 (07-15-1998)
Special Deposit Rules
- First
Time Exception
-
Safe Harbor/98 percent/95 percent
20.1.4.6.5 (07-15-1998)
Computing the FTD Penalty
- For
tax periods
beginning on or after January 1, 1993
refer to Form 941 deposit
requirements.
- To
determine if the deposit is
timely, see exhibit IRM 20.1.4–5.
-
Compare the taxpayer’s liability,
using the information from the
ROFT, with the deposits made. If
the ROFT information is
unavailable, use the averaging
method.
- If
there is an overstatement of the
ROFT that is due to a line item
adjustment, adjust the last
liability regardless of the dollar
amount.
-
If the taxpayer
shows a monthly or semi-weekly
liability of $100,000 or more,
refer to IRM 20.1.4.3.2.3 for
special deposit rules.
- For
tax periods
ending on or before December 31, 1992,
refer to Computing the FTD
Penalty—Form 941.
-
Refer to Exhibit 20.1.4–2 of LEM
20.1.4 to determine if a taxpayer
made timely and sufficient
deposits.
-
Compare the taxpayer’s liability,
using the information from the
ROFT, with deposits made. If ROFT
information is unavailable, use
the averaging method.
- If
there is an overstatement of the
ROFT that is due to a line item
adjustment, adjust the last
liability regardless of the dollar
amount.
- If
the taxpayer reports only monthly
totals in the ROFT, and any
monthly total is $3,000 or more,
consider the liability not
furnished. Average the entire tax
liability; Any monthly total is
less than $3,000 each, consider
the monthly liabilities
attributable to the last period of
each month.
- If
the taxpayer reports monthly or
eighth-monthly liabilities of
$100,000 or more, refer to the
special deposit rules. See IRM
20.1.4.3.2.3.
- When
computing Form 943 in quarterly
portions, exceptions apply only to the
last month of the reporting period
(December). Exceptions do not apply to
the last month of each quarter (March,
June and September).
20.1.4.6.6 (07-15-1998)
Averaged Penalty
-
Average the tax settlement amount if
the Record of Federal Tax (ROFT) Form
943 or 943A is incomplete or blank.
The tax settlement amount equals the
tax liability amount reduced by the
amount of any refundable credit
allowance (TC 150 less TC 766).
- For
tax periods
beginning on or after January 1, 1993,
the method of averaging will depend on
the type of depositor and the
information available.
- To
arrive at an averaged liability
for a
monthly depositor, who
has not provided any liability
breakdown, divide the net tax
liability by 12 and assign this
amount to each of the monthly
totals.
- To
compute an averaged liability for
a
semi-weekly depositor
who has not provided any liability
breakdown, divide the net tax
liability by four to arrive at a
quarterly amount. Divide the
resulting amount by 12 and assign
to the first 4 Wednesdays of each
month.
- To
compute an averaged liability for
a
semi-weekly depositor
who provided a monthly ROFT,
divide each month’s liability by
four and assign those four
liabilities to the first four
Wednesdays of that month.
-
When the averaged liability is
$100,000 or more, assign the
liability to the first day of the
semi-weekly period ending Friday.
This applies to both the monthly
and semi-weekly depositor.
- For
tax periods
ending on or before December 31, 1992,
to arrive at an averaged liability:
-
Divide the yearly net tax
liability by four to arrive at a
quarterly amount. Divide the
resulting amount by 12 and assign
to eighth-monthly periods B, D, F,
H, J, L, N, P, R, T, V and X.
- If
the averaged liability equals
$100,000 or more, assign the
liability to the first day of the
eighth-monthly periods B, D, F, H,
J, L, N, P, R, T, V and X.
-
Compute the penalty using the
averaged liability amount and
combine the quarterly amounts into
one total penalty amount (TC 180).
20.1.4.7
(07-15-1998)
Form 940 Series
- Form
940, Employer’s Annual Federal
Unemployment (FUTA) Tax Return, is an
annual return used to report Federal
unemployment tax. For deposit purposes,
divide each year into quarters.
- To show
the correct liability for the deposit
period, the taxpayer must list the tax
liability in the ROFT, if the total tax
is $100 or more.
- Refer to
Exhibit 20.1.4–9 to determine if the
taxpayer made timely deposits.
- For tax
periods beginning
on or after April 1, 1991,
the deposit requirements are based on
the amount of the tax liability incurred
at the end of the deposit period. See
Exhibit 20.1.4–9.
- If
the tax liability at the end of the
first, second or third quarter is
$100 or less, it is carried over to
the next quarter.
- If
the tax liability at the end of the
fourth quarter is $100 or less,
there is no requirement to deposit.
The taxpayer pays the tax with the
return or deposits it by the return
due date.
- If
the tax liability at the end of a
quarter is over $100, the taxes must
be deposited by the last day of the
following month.
- For tax
periods ending on
or before March 31, 1991, the
deposit requirements are based on the
amount of undeposited taxes at the end
of the deposit period.
- If
undeposited tax at the end of the
first, second or third quarter is
$100 or less, add that liability to
the liability incurred in the
following quarter.
- If
undeposited tax at the end of the
fourth quarter is $100 or less,
there is no requirement to deposit.
The taxpayer pays the tax with the
return or deposits it by the return
due date (return due date).
- If
undeposited tax at the end of a
quarter is over $100, the tax must
be deposited by the last day of the
following month.
20.1.4.7.1 (07-15-1998)
Computing the FTD Penalty
- Refer
to Form 940 deposit requirements
discussed above to determine if the
taxpayer made sufficient deposits.
- Refer
to Exhibit 20.1.4–3 of LEM 20.1.4 to
determine if the taxpayer made timely
deposits.
-
Compare the taxpayer’s liability
information from the ROFT with the
deposits made. If these figures are
not available, averaging is used.
- If
there is an overstatement in the ROFT,
regardless of the dollar amount,
adjust the last
liability. Then, compute the penalty
just as you would for a Form 941
penalty.
20.1.4.7.2 (07-15-1998)
Averaged Penalty
-
Average the total tax when the ROFT is
incomplete or blank.
-
Subtract the credit reduction
amount from the total FUTA tax.
Divide the difference by 4 to get
a quarterly breakdown.
-
Add the credit reduction amount
back into the fourth quarter.
(Taxpayers determine the credit
reduction amount in the fourth
quarter. There is no deposit
requirement until that period.
DO NOT
include the credit reduction
amount in the total being
averaged.)
-
Consider the posted deposits as
payments against the resulting
quarterly liabilities.
-
Compute the penalty on under-deposits,
late deposits, and direct payments.
Assess the penalty, if appropriate.
20.1.4.8
(09-10-1999)
Form 720 Reporting Requirements
- Form
720, Quarterly Federal Excise Tax
Return, and any related attachments, are
used to report certain excise taxes. The
return is divided into three parts.
- Part
I reports taxes that
are subject
to deposit requirements,
- Part
II reports taxes that are
not subject
to deposit requirements, and
- Part
III provides a
computation of whether
there is a balance due or an
overpayment.
- The net
tax liability for each class of tax is
reported separately on Form 720,
Schedule A, by semi-monthly periods:
-
9-Day Rule taxes are reported on
line 1,
-
30-Day Rule taxes on line 2,
-
Alternative Method taxes on line 3,
and
-
14-Day Rule taxes on line 4.
-
Semimonthly periods consist of two
intervals within a month. The first
semimonthly period is the
first 15 days
of a month. The second semimonthly
period is the 16th
day through the last day of a
month.
- "Net tax
liability" the tax liability incurred
during the semi-monthly period, plus or
minus any applicable adjustments and
claims for that period.
- For
communications and air
transportation taxes, tax liability
is treated as incurred in the
semi-monthly period in which the tax
is collected, or
- in
the case of the Alternative Method,
is considered as collected.
- Form
270, Schedule C, is used to report
adjustments to previously-reported
liabilities and claims unrelated to
liabilities in lieu of filing a Form
8849, Claim for Refund of Excise Taxes.
20.1.4.8
Form 720 Reporting Requirements
20.1.4.8.1 (09-10-1999)
Filing
- The
requirement for filing a return
applies separately to each tax listed
by IRS No. on Form 720. Thus, the
filing of Form 720 for one IRS No.
does not constitute the filing of a
return for any other IRS No. (See
Exhibit 20.1.4–10).
- Only
one Form 720 is filed for a calendar
quarter, (the one-return rule). Under
this rule, if a person is reporting
two or more excise taxes and they are
due on different dates, use the
later
filing date. (See Exhibit 20.4–10).
- For
example: a Form 720 filer,
-
Reports IRS No. 60 for the third
Calendarquarter, which is
ordinarily due by
October 31,
also
-
Reports IRS No. 19, for which the
due date is
November 30,
-
Files only a single Form 720 which
is due by
November 30.
-
Extension of the filing date under the
one-return rule does not extend the
date for making deposits or payments
of tax.
-
For example, although the filing
of a Form 720 for the third
quarter reporting both IRS Nos. 19
and 60
delays the filing of the return
until
November 30,
-
any
underpayment for IRS
No. 60 must
be deposited by October 31.
- For
all taxes,
except those listed below,
the return must be filed by the last
day of the month following the end of
the calendar quarter.
- For
the exceptions listed below, the
return must be filed by the last day
of the second month following the end
of the calendar quarter.
-
Ozone Depleting Chemicals (ODC)
(IRS Nos. 19, 20 and 98),
-
communications (IRS No. 22), and
-
air transportation (IRS Nos. 26,
27, and 28).
- If any
due date for filing a return falls on
a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday,
the taxpayer may file the return on
the next business day.
20.1.4.8.2 (07-15-1998)
Payment
-
Payment must
be made by the return due date without
extension.
- There
is a special rule for the payment of
ODC floor stock tax (IRS No. 20), a
Part II tax. The payment is due on
June 30 of each year, two months
before the return is due on August 31.
20.1.4.8.3 (09-10-1999)
Deposits
- Taxes
that are subject to deposit
requirements are grouped together into
classes as follows:
-
9-Day Rule taxes,
-
30-Day Rule taxes,
-
Alternative Method taxes, and
-
14-Day Rule taxes.
- If a
taxpayer deposits more than one tax in
a class, all the taxes in a class are
combined to determine the deposit for
that class for the semimonthly period.
-
Deposit requirements apply separately
to each class of tax.
- A
deposit is due for each semi-monthly
period in which a liability is
incurred. See IRM 20.1.4.8.5, De
Minimis Exception to Deposit
Requirements.
- The
amount of each deposit of tax for a
semi-monthly period must be at least
the amount of the net tax liability
for that period unless a safe harbor
rule applies.
-
The net tax liability for the
semi-monthly period for that class
of tax is the amount entered in
the appropriate box on Schedule A.
- If
the deposit is timely made at an
authorized Government depositary,
and equals or exceeds the amount
entered in the Schedule A box for
the semi-monthly period,
-
then, the deposit requirement for
that class of tax for the
semi-monthly period has been met.
- An
additional deposit must be made in
September, beginning in 1995, for all
taxes except air transportation taxes,
which have an additional deposit
beginning in 1997. See IRM 20.1.4.8.7
for special rules for deposits in
September.
- Any
deposit of fuel taxes and IRS No. 28
required to be made after July
31,1998, and before October 1, 1998,
must be made by October 5, 1998. Any
deposit of IRS Nos. 26 and 27 that
would be due after August 14, 1998,
and before October 1, 1998, must be
made October 5, 1998; and any deposit
after August 14, 1997, and before
October 1, 1997, must be made by
October 10, 1997. This includes the
additional September deposit.
- See
IRM 20.1.4.1.3.1 for electronic funds
transfer payment system requirements.
20.1.4.8.4 (09-10-1999)
9-Day Rule; Line 1 of Schedule A
- The
9-Day Rule applies to all taxes in
Part I of Form 720 except the ODC tax
(IRS Nos. 98, 19), to which the 30-Day
Rule applies. Except for ODC tax, the
9-Day Rule always applies unless the
taxpayer chooses the Alternative
Method by using line 3 of Schedule A
and/or chooses the 14-Day Rule by
using line 4 of Schedule A.
- The
deposit of tax for a semi-monthly
period is due by the ninth day
following the end of the semi-monthly
period. Generally, this is the 24th
day of the month and the 9th day of
the following month.
- The
net tax liability for each
semi-monthly period in the quarter is
entered in line 1, boxes A—F, of
Schedule A.
- For
communications and air transportation
taxes, a taxpayer can change to the
Alternative Method of computing
deposits only at the beginning of a
calendar quarter. The taxpayer must
notify the Service before a new choice
is made so that proper adjustments may
be made in order to properly reflect
that person’s collections of excise
tax.
20.1.4.8.4.1 (07-15-1998)
30-Day Rule; Line 2 of Schedule A
- The
30-Day Rule applies only to ODC tax
(IRS Nos. 98, 19).
- The
deposit of tax for a semi-monthly
period is due by the last day of the
second following semi-monthly
period. Generally, this is the 15th
day of the following month and the
last day of the following month.
- The
net tax liability for each
semi-monthly period in the quarter
is entered in line 2, boxes G–L, of
Schedule A.
20.1.4.8.4.2 (09-10-1999)
Alternative Method; Line 3 of
Schedule A
- The
Alternative Method applies only to
communications (IRS No. 22) and air
transportation taxes (IRS Nos. 26,
28, 27). If a person is using the
Alternative Method,
amounts
considered as collected
are reported on line 3 of Schedule
A. If line 3 is not used, the
Alternative Method does not apply.
For reporting information relating
to tax under the alternative method,
see Exhibit 20.1.4–10.
-
Under the Alternative Method:
-
The tax included in amounts
billed or tickets sold during a
semi-monthly period is
considered
as collected, during
the first seven days of the
second semi-monthly period
following the semi-monthly
period in which the amounts were
billed or tickets sold.
-
For example, the tax included in
amounts billed between January 1
and January 15, 1999, is
considered as collected during
the period February 1 through
February 7, 1999.
- The
amount reported on Schedule A for
each semi-monthly period is the tax
considered as
collected during that
period. For example, the tax
considered as collected during the
period February 1 through February
7, 1999, is the amount reported for
the period February 1 through
February 15, 1999.
- The
net tax liability for each
semi-monthly period in the quarter
is entered in line 3, boxes M—R, of
Schedule A. For example, the tax
considered as
collected during the
period February 1 through February
7, 1999 is reported in box O of
Schedule A.
- The
deposit of tax
considered as collected
for the first semi-monthly period of
the month is due by the 3rd banking
day after the 7th day of that month
(generally, the 10th day of that
month).
- The
deposit for the second semi-monthly
period of the month is due by the
3rd banking day after the 22nd day
of that month (generally, the 25th
day of that month).
- For
example: The deposit for the
semi-monthly period beginning on
February 1, 1999 is due by February
10, 1999 (this is a deposit of the
tax included in amounts billed
between January 1 and January 15,
1999, and considered as collected
between February 1 and February 7,
1999.
- A
taxpayer can change to the 9-Day
Rule of computing deposits only at
the beginning of a calendar quarter.
The taxpayer must notify the IRS
before a new choice is made so that
proper adjustments may be made in
order to properly reflect that
person’s collections of excise tax.
20.1.4.8.4.3 (09-10-1999)
14-Day Rule; Line 4 of Schedule A
- The
14-Day Rule applies only to IRC
section 4081 taxes (IRS Nos. 60, 35,
62, 58, 73, 74, 59, 75, 76, 14) and
only if the deposit is made by
EFTPS.
- If a
person is using the 14-Day Rule, net
tax liability is reported on line 4
of Schedule A. If line 4 is not
used, the 14-Day Rule does not
apply.
- The
application of the 14-Day Rule is
effective for deposits relating to
calendar quarters beginning after
March 31, 1991, except that
application to:
-
IRS Nos. 73, 74, 75, & 76 begins
with the quarter ending 199303,
-
IRS No. 60 begins with the
quarter ending 199403,
-
IRS No. 14 begins on August 27,
1996.
-
IRS No. 35 begins July 1, 1998.
- The
deposit of tax for a semi-monthly
period is due by the 14th day
following the end of the
semi-monthly period. Generally, this
is the 29th day of the month and the
14th day of the following month.
-
Under the 14-Day Rule, if the 14th
day is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal
holiday, the due date is the
immediate
preceding day that is not
a Saturday, Sunday, or legal
holiday. This is an exception to the
normal treatment of deposit due
dates falling on a Saturday, Sunday,
or holiday.
- The
net tax liability for each
semi-monthly period in the quarter
is entered in line 4, boxes S–X, of
Schedule A.
20.1.4.8.5 (09-10-1999)
De Minimis Exception to Deposit
Requirements
- Form
720 deposits are not required if the
net tax liability for the quarter does
not exceed $2,000. This is known as a
"de minimis exception" .
- The
$2,000 "de minimis exception" applies
only to the taxes listed in Part I,
Form 720. For example:
- A
return is filed reporting $1,950,
Part I taxes, and $4,000, Part II
taxes,
-
therefore, no deposits would be
due against the total liability of
$5,950.
-
The $4,000 Part II taxes are not
subject to deposit requirements,
and the $1,950 Part I taxes are
below the $2,000 "de minimis
exception."
- To
compute the $2,000 threshold,
exclude taxes
reported on a one-time filing,
which are not subject to deposit. For
example, No
deposits are required for a
one-time filing
of:
-
Gas guzzler tax (IRS No. 40), or
-
luxury tax (IRS No. 92).
- A
person has made a one-time filing
of Form 720 for IRS Nos. 40 and/or
92, if: the Form 720 is the
person’s first Form 720 filed, the
"final return block" on the front
of Form 720 is marked, and no
other taxes are reported.
20.1.4.8.6 (09-10-1999)
Safe Harbor Rules for Deposits
- The
safe harbor rules apply separately to
deposits under the 9-Day Rule, 30-Day
Rule, Alternative Method, and 14-Day
Rule.
- If the
conditions of the safe harbor rule are
met, a person that has made timely
deposits at an authorized Government
depositary of less than the full
amount of net tax liability for each
semi-monthly period in the quarter is
considered to have satisfied the
deposit requirement for the quarter.
- See
IRM 20.1.4.8.7for special safe harbor
rules for deposits in September.
- The
lookback analysis under Form 720 Safe
Harbor Rule is not the same as the
lookback analysis for Form 941.
20.1.4.8.6.1 (09-10-1999)
Lookback Quarter Safe Harbor (1/6
Rule)
- The
lookback quarter liability safe
harbor (1/6 Rule) applies to any
entity that filed Form 720 for that
class of tax for the second
preceding quarter (the lookback
quarter). The 1/6 Rule applies
without regard to the amount of the
liability for the current quarter.
- To
satisfy the deposit requirements
under the 1/6 Rule, the taxpayer
must meet the following conditions:
-
The deposit for each
semi-monthly period in the
current quarter, must be at
least 1/6
of the net tax liability of the
lookback quarter, for the same
class of tax. For example: If we
are discussing the 9-Day Rule in
the current quarter (for
example, 199712), then we must
look at the net tax liability
for the 9-Day Rule in the second
preceding quarter (lookback
quarter) (for example, 9706);
therefore the deposit for each
semi-monthly period in the
current quarter must equal
1/6 of lookback
quarter net tax liability.
-
Each deposit must be timely made
at an authorized Government
depositary.
-
Any underpayment of the
liability for the current
quarter must be paid by the
return due date without
extension.
- In
general, the underpayment must be
paid with the return. If the return
due date is extended under the
one-return rule, special rules apply
to the underpayment:
-
A deposit must be made by the
last day of the month following
the end of the quarter (the date
the return would be due without
extension).
-
The deposit cannot be less than
the lesser
of (1) The amount by
which the net tax liability in
that class for the current
calendar quarter,
exceeds:
The net tax liability for the
look-back quarter,
or
(2) the amount of any
underpayment of taxes in that
class for the current calendar
quarter.
-
For 9–Day Rule class, do not
include the communications (IRS
No. 22) and air transportation
taxes (IRS Nos. 26, 28, 27) in
determining net tax liability in
that class.
- If a
tax rate increase goes into effect
for a quarter, the following
additional condition applies.
-
The 1/6 Rule does not apply for
the first and second calendar
quarters, beginning on or after
the effective date of the
increase,
unless: The deposit
of taxes for each semi-monthly
period in the calendar quarter
is not less than 1/6
of the liability the taxpayer
would have had for the look-back
quarter, if the increased tax
rate had been in effect during
the look-back quarter.
-
Thus, if tax rates are
increased, taxpayers must
deposit 1/6
of the amount that they would
have been liable for in the
look-back quarter, had the
higher rate applied at that
time.
- Use
of the safe harbor is not permitted
unless a tax was imposed throughout
the look-back quarter.
20.1.4.8.6.2 (09-10-1999)
Current Liability Safe Harbor (95
Percent Rule)
- The
current liability safe harbor (95
Percent Rule) may be used by any
Form 720 filer.
- To
satisfy the deposit requirements
under the 95 Percent Rule, the
taxpayer must meet the following
conditions:
-
The deposit for each
semi-monthly period must be at
least 95 percent of the net
liability for the class of tax
for the semi-monthly period. For
example, 95 percent of the
liability for 9-Day Rule taxes
in that semi-monthly period.
-
Each deposit must be timely made
at an authorized government
depositary.
-
Any underpayment of the
liability for the current
quarter must be paid by the
return due date without
extension.
- In
general, the underpayment must be
paid with the return. If the return
due date is extended under the
one-return rule, special rules apply
to the underpayment.
-
A deposit must be made by the
last day of the month, following
the last month of the quarter
(the date the return would be
due without extension) of at
least five percent of the net
tax liability in that classand
air transportation taxes (IRS
Nos. 26, 28, 27) for the current
quarter, or the amount of the
underpayment for the current
quarter, whichever is less.
-
For 9–Day Rule class, do not
include communications (IRS No.
22) and air transportation taxes
(IRS Nos. 26, 28, 27) in
determining net tax liability
for that class.
20.1.4.8.7 (09-10-1999)
Special Rules for Deposits in
September
- An
additional deposit is required during
the third quarter of each year in
September for each class of tax.
20.1.4.8.7.1 (09-10-1999)
9–Day Rule, 14–Day Rule
- For
the second semimonthly period in
September, seperate deposits are
required for the period September 16
to 26 (16 to 25 for non-EFTPS
depositors) and the period September
27 to 30 (26 to 30 for non-EFTPS
depositors).
- For
the period beginning September 16
and ending September 26, the deposit
must be made by September 29 (28 for
non-EFTPS depositors). If the due
date falls on a Saturday, the
deposit is due on the preceding
Friday. If the due date falls on a
Sunday, the deposit is due on the
following Monday.
- The
net tax liability for the period
September 16 to 26 (16 to 25 for
non-EFTPS depositors) is entered on
Schedule A, in line 1, below box F
(9-Day Rule), or in line 4, below
box X (14-Day Rule).
- For
the period ending September 30, the
deposit must be made by the due date
under the 9-Day or 14-Day Rule,
whichever applies.
- The
net tax liability for the period
ending September 30 is entered on
Schedule A, in line 1, box F (9-Day
Rule), or line 4, box X (14-Day
Rule).
- The
amount of each deposit for these
periods must be at least the amount
of net tax liability incurred during
the periods unless a safe harbor
rule applies.
-
There are delayed deposits for some
taxes due in September 1997 and
1998. See IRM 20.1.4.8.3, Deposits.
20.1.4.8.7.2 (09-10-1999)
30-Day Rule
- For
the first semimonthly period in
September, separate deposits are
required for the period September 1
to 11 (1 to 10 for non-EFTPS
depositors) and the period September
12 to 15 (11 to 15 for non-EFTPS
depositors).
- For
the second semimonthly period in
August and the period September 1 to
11 (1 to 10 for non-EFTPS
depositors), the deposit must be
made by September 29 (28 for
non-EFTPS depositors). If the due
date falls on a Saturday, the
deposit is due on the preceding
Friday. If the due date falls on a
Sunday, the deposit is due on the
following Monday.
- The
net tax liability for the period
August 16 to September 11 (August 16
to September 10 for non-EFTPS
depositors) is entered in line 2,
below box K, of Schedule A.
- For
the period ending September 15, the
deposit must be made by the due date
under the 30-Day Rule.
- The
net tax liability for the period
ending September 15 is entered in
line 2, box K, of Schedule A.
- The
amount of each deposit for these
periods must be at least the amount
of net tax liability incurred during
the periods unless a safe harbor
rule applies.
20.1.4.8.7.3 (09-10-1999)
Alternative Method
- In
the case of alternative method taxes
charged (that is, included in
amounts billed or tickets sold)
during the first semimonthly period
in September, separate deposits are
required for the taxes charged
during the period September 1 to 11
(1 to 10 for non-EFTPS depositors)
and the period September 12 to 15
(11 to 15 for non-EFTPS depositors).
- For
taxes charged during the period
beginning September 1, the deposit
must be made by September 29 (28 for
non-EFTPS depositors). If the due
date falls on a Saturday, the
deposit is due on the preceding
Friday. If the due date falls on a
Sunday the deposit is due on the
following Monday.
- For
taxes charged during the period
September 1 to 11 (1 to 10 for
non-EFTPS depositors), the net tax
liability is entered on line 3,
above box M, of Schedule A for the
fourth quarter
return.
- For
taxes charged during the period
ending September 15, the deposit
must be made by the due date under
the Alternative Method for making
deposits for the first semimonthly
period in October.
- For
taxes charged during the period
September 12 to 15 (11 to 15 for
non-EFTPS depositors), the net tax
liability is entered in line 3, in
box M, of Schedule A for the
fourth quarter
return.
- The
amount of each deposit for these
periods must be at least the amount
of alternative method taxes charged
during the periods unless a safe
harbor rule applies.
- For
air transportation of persons (IRS
Nos. 26, 27) there is delayed
deposit for taxes due in September
1997 and 1998. See IRM 20.1.4.8.3,
Deposits of this handbook.
20.1.4.8.7.4 (09-10-1999)
Special Safe Harbor Rules
- The
1/6 Rule does not apply for the
third calendar quarter unless—
-
The deposit of 9-Day Rule taxes
or 14-Day Rule taxes for the
period September 16 to 26 (16 to
25 for non-EFTPS depositors) is
not less than 11/90
( 10/90
for non-EFTPS depositors) of the
net tax liability reported for
the same class of tax for the
look-back quarter; and
-
The total deposit of 9-Day Rule
taxes or 14-Day Rule taxes for
the second semimonthly period in
September is not less than
1/6 of the net
tax liability reported for the
same class of tax for the
lookback quarter.
- The
95 Percent Rule does not apply for
the third calendar quarter unless—
-
The deposit of 9-Day Rule taxes
or 14-Day Rule taxes for the
period September 16 to 26 (16 to
25 for non-EFTPS depositors) is
not less than 69.67 percent
(63.33 percent for non-EFTPS
depositors) of the net tax
liability for the same class of
tax for the second semi-monthly
period in September; and
-
The total deposit of 9-Day Rule
taxes or 14-Day Rule taxes for
the second semi-monthly period
in September is not less than 95
percent of the net tax liability
for that class for that
semi-monthly period.
20.1.4.8.7.5 (09-10-1999)
30-day Rule
- The
1/6 Rule does not apply for the
third calendar quarter unless—
-
The deposit for the period
September 1 to 11 (1 to 10 for
non-EFTPS depositors) is not
less than 11/90
( 10/90
for non-EFTPS depositors) of the
net tax liability reported for
the 30-Day Rule taxes for the
lookback quarter; and
-
The total deposit for the first
semimonthly period in September
is not less than 1/6
of the net tax liability
reported for the 30-Day Rule
taxes for the lookback quarter.
- The
95 Percent Rule does not apply for
the third calendar quarter unless—
-
The deposit for the period
September 1 to 11 (1 to 10 for
non-EFTPS depositors) is not
less than 69.67 percent (63.33
percent for non-EFTPS
depositors) of the net tax
liability for the 30-Day Rule
taxes for the first semi-monthly
period in September; and
-
The total deposit for the first
semi-monthly period in September
is not less than 95 percent of
the net tax liability for 30-Day
Rule taxes for that semi-monthly
period.
20.1.4.8.7.6 (09-10-1999)
Alternate Method
- The
1/6 Rule does not apply for the
fourth calendar quarter unless—
-
The deposit for alternative
method taxes charged during the
period September 1 to 11 (1 to
10 for non-EFTPS depositors) is
not less than 11/90
( 10/90
for non-EFTPS depositors) of the
net tax liability reported for
alternative method taxes for the
lookback quarter; and
-
The total deposit for
alternative method taxes charged
during the first semimonthly
period in September is not less
than 1/6
of the net tax liability
reported for alternative method
taxes for the lookback quarter.
- The
95 Percent Rule does not apply for
the fourth calendar quarter unless—
-
The deposit for alternative
method taxes charged during the
period September 1 to 11 (1 to
10 for non-EFTPS depositors) is
not less than 69.67 percent
(63.33 percent for non-EFTPS
depositors) of the alternative
method taxes charged during the
first semimonthly period in
September; and
-
The total deposit for
alternative method taxes charged
during the first semimonthly
period in September is not less
than 95 percent of the
alternative method taxes charged
during that semimonthly period.
20.1.4.8.8 (07-15-1998)
Computing the FTD Penalty
- A
deposit must be made for each
semi-monthly period for which there is
an entry in a box on Schedule A. The
amount of each deposit for a
semi-monthly period must be at least
the amount of the net tax liability
entered in the appropriate box on
Schedule A for that period unless a
safe harbor rule applies.
- To
determine whether a sufficient amount
has been deposited, Schedule A must be
completed. If Schedule A is complete,
compare the amounts entered on
Schedule A to the deposits and
payments the person has made.
- If the
deposit is timely made at an
authorized Government depositary and
equals or exceeds the amount entered
in the Schedule A box for the
semi-monthly period, the deposit
requirement for that class of tax for
the semi-monthly period is satisfied.
- Each
"Rule" stands alone when determining
if a liability was satisfied. A
deposit made for one rule cannot be
applied to another rule.
-
When deposits are considered
between two "Rules" , FIFO does
not apply. For example, when it is
determined that a deposit is
intended for a liability under the
30-Day Rule, it cannot be applied
to a liability under the 9-Day
Rule.
-
When deposits are considered for
only one "Rule" , FIFO does apply.
- If
Schedule A is not completed, penalties
have to be proposed. Proposing a
penalty allows the taxpayer time to
provide needed information.
-
Call (or write)
the taxpayer to request a
completed Schedule A.
- If
a new Schedule A is received for
the review quarter, determine
whether a failure to deposit
penalty applies.
- If
a new Schedule A is not received,
compute and assess an averaged
penalty.
- A
penalty may be imposed if the person
has not made timely deposits in
sufficient amounts at an authorized
Government depositary. Therefore, the
taxpayer must meet the following three
conditions:
-
Timeliness,
-
sufficient amount, and
-
authorized depositary.
20.1.4.8.8.1 (07-15-1998)
Timeliness
- If
the deposit is received by the
deposit due date for each rule, the
deposit is timely. See Exhibit
20.1.4–5 of LEM 20.1.4.
- Each
"Rule" stands alone when determining
if a liability was satisfied. A
deposit made for one rule cannot be
applied to another rule. For
example:
-
9-Day taxes are due, generally,
the 24th day and the 9th day of
each month, and
-
30-Day taxes are due, generally,
the 15th day and the last day of
each month.
- For
each semi-monthly period, the
deposit due date for each class of
tax (9-Day Rule, 14-Day Rule, 30-Day
Rule, or Alternative Method) is the
date from which penalty is computed.
20.1.4.8.8.2 (09-10-1999)
Sufficient Amount
- If
the deposit is timely made at an
authorized Government depositary,
but is less than the amount entered
in the Schedule A box for the
semi-monthly period, determine the
following: Check to see if the 1/6
Rule is satisfied.
-
The lookback quarter liability
is the net
tax liability amount
entered on line 1b, 2b, 3b or
4b, whichever applies, of the
Schedule A for the lookback
quarter. Divide that amount by
six
to determine the amount required
to be deposited in each
semi-monthly period for the
current quarter under the 1/6
Rule.
-
Compare each deposit (including
any credits from prior quarters
or semi-monthly periods) with
the amount required to be
deposited in each semi-monthly
period.
-
If the amounts deposited are
sufficient and the amount of any
underpayment is paid by the due
date of the return, then the 1/6
Rule is satisfied and
no
penalty is appropriate. An
underpayment is the
difference between the amount
entered on line 1b, 2b, 3b, or
4b, whichever applies, of the
current quarter Schedule A, and
the same line of the Schedule A
for the lookback quarter.
-
If the 1/6 Rule is not satisfied
for any
semi-monthly period within the
quarter, the 1/6 Rule does not
apply for that quarter. For
example: Even if five of the six
semi-monthly periods within the
quarter are satisfied, and only
one semi-monthly period is not
satisfied, then the 1/6 Rule
cannot
be used for any of the liability
periods during the quarter.
However, no taxpayer has to pay
more than they actually owe. For
example: If the deposit for the
sixth semi-monthly liability
period is less than the 1/6 Rule
amount, but the total deposits
fully pay the liability for the
entire quarter,
no penalty
applies.
- If
the 1/6 Rule is not satisfied, check
to see if the 95 Percent Rule is
satisfied.
-
Compare each deposit (including
any credits from prior quarters
or semi-monthly periods) with
the amount reported in the
Schedule A box for each
semi-monthly period. The deposit
must be at least 95 percent of
the amount reported on Schedule
A.
-
If the amounts deposited are
sufficient and the amount of the
underpayment is paid by the due
date of the return, then the 95
Percent Rule is satisfied and
no
penalty is appropriate. An
underpayment is the
difference between the amount
entered on Schedule A and the
amount deposited.
-
If the 95 Percent Rule is not
satisfied for
any semi-monthly
period within the quarter, the
95 Percent Rule does not apply
for that quarter. For example:
Even if five of the six
semi-monthly periods within the
quarter are satisfied, and only
one semi-monthly period is not
satisfied, then the 95 Percent
Rule
cannot be used for
any of the liability periods
during the quarter. However, no
taxpayer has to pay more than
they actually owe. For example:
If the deposit for the sixth
semi-monthly liability period is
less than the 95 Percent Rule
safe harbor amount, but the
total deposits fully pay the
liability for the entire
quarter,
no penalty applies.
- If
the 95 Percent Rule is also not
satisfied, compute the penalty. For
each semi-monthly period, subtract
the amount deposited from the amount
entered in the Schedule A box and
compute the penalty based on the
difference.
- If
the underpayment, for either safe
harbor (1/6 Rule or 95 Percent
Rule), is not paid by the due date
of the return: The safe harbor does
not apply for the entire quarter.
For each semi-monthly period,
subtract the amount deposited from
the amount entered in the Schedule A
box and compute the penalty based on
the difference.
20.1.4.8.8.2.1 (07-15-1998)
Authorized Depositary
- If
the deposit is timely and in the
correct amount, but is not made at
an authorized depositary as
required, the 10 percent penalty
applies. If the taxpayer was using
a safe harbor rule and failed to
use an authorized depositary, the
safe harbor (1/6 Rule or 95
Percent Rule) does not apply for
the entire quarter.
20.1.4.8.8.3 (09-10-1999)
Averaged Penalty
-
Whenever Schedule A is missing and a
Schedule A is not received after
contact with the taxpayer, determine
whether a penalty applies by
computing a separate averaged
semi-monthly liability for 9-Day and
30-Day Rule taxes.
- Add
the liabilities for all Part I taxes
listed on the transcript except for
IRS Nos. 98 and 19. Divide the total
by six. Use the result as the net
liability for 9–Day Rule taxes for
each semi-monthly period.
- Add
the liabilities listed on the
transcript for IRS Nos. 98 and 19.
Divide the total by six. Use the
result as the net liability for
30–Day Rule taxes for each
semi-monthly period.
20.1.4.8.8.4 (07-15-1998)
Transitional Rule for the
Alternative Method
- The
Alternative Method applies
only
to communications (IRS No. 22) and
air transportation taxes (IRS Nos.
26, 28, 27). If a person is using
the Alternative Method,
amounts
considered as collected
are reported on line 3 of Schedule
A.
-
There is a special Transitional Rule
which applies and can be used by any
person who has been making deposits
under the Alternative Method, and
appears to have reported tax too
soon on Form 720 and Schedule A.
-
This early reporting of tax
makes otherwise timely deposits
appear to be late.
-
For detailed information, refer
to Notice
1009, Information on the
Alternative Method of Reporting
on Form 720, Schedule A.
- If
it appears the taxpayer reported tax
too soon, call
or write (enclosing Notice 1009 and
Schedule A) the taxpayer about the
problem. Allow the taxpayer time to
respond (30 days).
20.1.4.8.8.5 (09-10-1999)
Quarter in Question
- If
the taxpayer sends in a corrected
Schedule A, with:
-
The first two semi-monthly
periods blank,
-
any of the other four
semi-monthly periods showing a
liability amount, and
-
the amounts in the boxes match
the deposits timely received,
then
-
there is
no penalty.
-
Disregard the first two
semi-monthly (blank) periods.
These were reported on the
previous Schedule A.
- The
taxpayer has only
one opportunity to
"transition" to the correct
reporting period.
20.1.4.9
(07-15-1998)
Form 1042
-
Taxpayers file Form 1042, Annual
Withholding Tax Return for U.S. Source
Income of Foreign Persons, to report and
pay tax due on income derived from
sources in the United States. Currently,
Form 1042 is processed only at the
Philadelphia Service Center.
- This
form is filed by a withholding agent
(who could be an individual, a trust,
estate, partnership, corporation,
government agency, association, or
tax-exempt foundation) that may be
domestic or foreign who receives,
controls, has custody or disposes of, or
pays income from sources within the
United States.
-
Taxpayers may file Form 2758,
Application for Extension to File
Certain Excise, Income, Information, and
Other Returns. Approval of the extension
allows additional time to file the
return.
- Form
2758 DOES NOT provide additional time to
pay the taxes.
20.1.4.9.1 (07-15-1998)
Deposit Requirements
- FTD
deposit requirements for Form 1042
were not affected by the revised
regulations effective for periods
after December 31, 1992. The
quarter-monthly periods still apply.
- For
deposit purposes, divide each month
into four periods ending on the 7th,
15th, 22nd and last day of the month.
These periods are called
quarter-monthly periods. The tax
return labels them 1 through 60.
- The
taxpayer must list the tax liability
in the ROFT section, if the yearly tax
is at least $200.
-
Deposit requirements are based on the
amount of
undeposited taxes at the
end of the deposit period. Exceptions
may apply due to Foreign Tax Treaties.
See Exhibit 20.1.4–12.
- If
the taxes at the end of a month
(other than December) are under
$200, they are carried to the next
month.
- If
taxes at the end of December are
under $200, they may be paid with
the return or deposited by the
return due date.
- If
the taxes at the end of a month
are $200 or more, but less than
$2,000, the deposits must be made
by the 15th of the following
month.
- If
an earlier quarter-monthly deposit
was made and taxes are $200 or
more but less than $2,000 in a
month other than December, the
taxes are carried to the next
month. For December, the deposits
must be made by the return due
date.
- If
undeposited taxes at the end of a
quarter-monthly period are $2,000
or more, the deposits must be made
within 3 banking days after the
quarterly-monthly period.
20.1.4.9.2 (07-15-1998)
Special Deposit Requirements
-
90 Percent/Safe Harbor Rule—Taxpayers
are considered to have met the $2,000
deposit requirement in the above, if
they comply with all of the following:
At least 90 percent of the liability
is paid timely. The remaining balance
for each month is paid as follows:
-
The taxpayer deposits
underpayments from a month (
other than
December) with or
before the first deposit due after
the 15th day of the following
month. If there are no deposits
due after that date, the taxpayer
deposits underpayments of
$200 or more
by January 31. The taxpayer pays
underpayment amounts
under $200
with the return or deposits them
by the return due date.
-
The taxpayer deposits
December
underpayments of
$200 or more
by January 31.
-
The taxpayer pays
Decemberunderpayment
amounts under $200 with the return
or deposits them by the return due
date.
-
For periods
ending after March 31, 1991,
see LEM 20.1.4.3.5.
- Apply
deposits made after the 15th day of
the following month as follows:
-
Satisfy any Safe Harbor
underpayment from the prior month.
- If
the deposit does not satisfy the
full amount, apply in the order in
which they accrued.
- See
Exhibit 20.1.4–6 of LEM 20.1.4 to
determine if the taxpayer made timely
deposits.
-
Taxpayers do not have to apply the
Safe Harbor provisions to all deposits
in a specific tax period. They may
apply the provisions to certain
deposits, while paying 100 percent of
the others.
20.1.4.9.3 (07-15-1998)
Computing the FTD Penalty
- Refer
to Form 1042 deposit requirements (See
Exhibit 20.1.4–12) to determine if
sufficient deposits were made).
-
Compare the tax liability:
- on
the Record of Federal Tax (ROFT)
with the deposits made.
- If
the ROFT is incomplete or blank,
average the total tax.
- For
deposits required after December 31,
1989, there is a four tier penalty
system. The penalty rate assessed
depends on the number of days a
deposit is late. See Exhibit 20.1.4–4.
-
Remember that
exceptions apply only to
the last month of the reporting period
(December). They do not apply to the
last month of each quarter (March,
June and September).
20.1.4.9.4 (07-15-1998)
Averaged Penalty
- If the
ROFT is incomplete or blank, average
the total tax as shown below:
-
Divide the tax liability: by four
to get a quarterly amount, then
divide each quarterly amount by
12.
-
Consider the results as the tax
liability for ROFT periods 5, 10,
15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50,
55, and 60.
-
Compute the penalty.
-
Total the quarterly penalty
amounts for one penalty assessment
amount.
20.1.4.9.5 (09-10-1999)
Deficiency Procedures
- The
determination of whether a penalty
will be subject to a statutory notice
of deficiency procedure usually
depends on whether the underlying tax
is subject to the deficiency
procedure.
- IRC
section 1441, Withholding of Income
Tax on Nonresident Aliens, is subject
to deficiency procedures. IRC section
6665, Applicable Rules, does not
exclude IRC section 6656, Federal Tax
Deposit penalties.
- The
statutory notice of deficiency
procedures will apply to a Federal Tax
Deposit penalty as well as any
underpayment of tax. Even if there is
not an underpayment of tax, statutory
notice of deficiency procedures apply
to the Federal Tax Deposit penalty as
it relates to the Form 1042. See IRM
20.1 for additional information
regarding deficiency vs.
non-deficiency procedures.
20.1.4.10
(07-15-1998)
Form CT–1
- The
federally administered railroad
retirement system covers railroad
employees and provides benefits similar
to those under the social security
system (Tier 1 benefits) as well as
benefits similar to those under a
private pension (Tier 2 benefits).
- The
payment of benefits is administered by
the Railroad Retirement Board.
- These
benefits are funded by a payroll tax on
rail employers and employees.
- Rail
employers pay a Tier 1 tax, which is
equivalent to the tax under the
Federal Insurance Contributions Act
(FICA) and a Tier 2 tax, which is
16.1% of wages for 1995.
- Rail
employees also pay a Tier 1 tax
equivalent to the FICA tax and a
Tier 2 tax.
-
Though the tax rate has not changed
for several years, the wage base
changes from year to year. The Form
CT–1 for any given year will reflect
the applicable tax rate and wage
base for that year.
- For
additional information on Form CT–1, see
IRM Part III, BMF and Non-Master File
(NMF) DP Tax Adjustment.
- The
Kansas City Service Center processes
Forms CT–1. Penalty adjustments on Forms
CT–1 should be made only after
contacting KCSC.
20.1.4.10.1 (07-15-1998)
Filing Requirements
- Form
CT–1 (Employer’s Annual Railroad
Retirement Tax Return) is an
annual
return due the last day of February of
the following year. The Form CT–1 is
used to report and pay Railroad
Retirement Tax (RRTA) (including
Supplemental Annuity tax and Special
Supplemental Annuity tax. For rail
wages paid prior to June 1, 1993, rail
employers reported and paid Railroad
Unemployment Repayment Tax (RURT) on
Form CT–1.
- The
Railroad Retirement Tax (RRTA) and
Railroad Unemployment Repayment Tax
(RURT) each have a separate ROFT.
-
Taxpayers must complete Part II
(Record of Railroad Retirement Tax
Liability) if they are monthly
depositors.
-
Taxpayers must complete Form 945–A,
annual Record of Federal Tax
Liability, if they
-
are semi-weekly depositors, or
-
accumulate $100,000 or more on any
day during a deposit period.
- Both
Part II and Form 945–A are used to
report tax liabilities reported on
Form CT–1. This should be a summary of
tax liability, NOT a summary of
deposits.
- Prior
to 1994, Schedule B (Form 941),
Supplemental Record of Tax Liability,
was used instead of Form 945–A. Since
Schedule B covered only one quarter,
four Schedules B may need to be
attached to the Form CT–1. For 1993
only, Schedule B was also completed if
a taxpayer made deposits under the
Transition Year rules (old deposit
rules).
-
Currently, Form CT–1 consists of two
major parts (Part I and II). A Part
III was used only for periods
beginning October 1985 through June
1993.
-
Part I—Railroad
Retirement Taxes.
The adjusted total of supplemental
annuity tax, and the adjusted
total of employer and employee
railroad retirement taxes based on
compensation, are combined and
should equal the total for year of
Part II.
-
Part II—Record of
Railroad Retirement Tax Liability.
For deposit purposes, deposits are
made as described below even
though the return is an annual
return. Compute the penalty for
each deposit separately and
combine the deposit penalty
amounts.
-
Part III—Railroad
Unemployment Repayment Tax (RURT).
CAUTION:
RURT is not required to be paid
for rail wages paid on and after
July 1, 1993. The loans and
interest were fully repaid as of
June 1993.
- If
RURT taxes for the year are more
than $100, the tax liability must
be listed in the ROFT section of
Part III.
-
For deposit purposes, divide each
year into quarters.
- For
periods between April 1, 1991 and June
30, 1993 deposit liabilities were
determined by the amount of
accumulated tax liability. For periods
ending March 31, 1991 and prior
deposits liabilities were determined
by the amount of undeposited taxes.
- If the
accumulated tax liability (undeposited
taxes) at the end of the first,
second, or third quarter is $100 or
less, the taxpayer carries it to the
next quarter.
- If the
accumulated tax liability (undeposited
taxes) is more than $100 at the end of
any quarter, the taxpayer must deposit
it by the last day of the following
month.
- If the
accumulated tax liability (undeposited
taxes) at the end of the last quarter
of the year is $100 or less, the
taxpayer may submit the payment with
the return or deposit it by the return
due date.
-
Special rule for 1989 returns:
Due to changes resulting from the
Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue
Act (TAMRA), deposits of RURT are not
required. These taxes must have been
paid by the deposit due date. The FTD
penalty does not apply to RURT taxes
for 1989.
20.1.4.10.2 (07-15-1998)
Deposit Requirements RRTA Part II
- For
periods after
December 31, 1994:
-
The taxpayer must deposit by EFT
if a taxpayer’s total deposits of
taxes, during the determination
period, exceed a prescribed dollar
threshold.
-
See Exhibit 20.1.4–3 for threshold
amounts, determinations periods
and applicable effective dates.
-
See earlier discussion of EFT
deposit requirements.
20.1.4.10.2.1 (07-15-1998)
RRTA Part II January 1, 1993
- When
depositing RRTA (other than
Supplemental Taxes and RURT) the
taxpayer will be either a monthly or
semi-weekly depositor based on the
lookback period.
- The
deposit requirements for Form CT–1
are generally the same as the
deposit requirements for Form 941.
- If
the total tax liability for the year
is less than $500, no deposits are
required. The taxpayer may pay those
taxes with the return.
- A
taxpayer must follow the
monthly
deposit schedule if the total RRTA
taxes for the lookback period is
$50,000 or less. The lookback period
is the second calendar year
preceding the current calendar year.
-
Tax liability for a calendar
month must be deposited by the
15th day of the following month.
-
Any safe harbor shortfall
(make-up) amount is due on the
filing due date for the return
period in which the underpayment
occurs. Payment may accompany
the return.
- A
taxpayer must follow the
semi-weekly
deposit schedule if the total RRTA
taxes during the lookback period is
more than $50,000.
-
Tax liabilities for payments
made on Wednesday, Thursday
and/or Friday must be deposited
by the following Wednesday.
-
Tax liabilities for payments
made on Saturday, Sunday,
Monday, and/or Tuesday must be
deposited by the following
Friday.
-
The shortfall make-up date for
semi-weekly/one-day depositors
is the first Wednesday or Friday
(whichever is earlier) falling
on or after the 15th day of the
month following the month in
which the deposit was required
to be made, or if earlier, the
due date for the return period.
- If
tax liability of $100,000 or more is
accumulated on any day within either
deposit period (4 or 5 above), the
taxes must be deposited the next
business day. The taxpayer should
begin accumulating tax liability
following the semi-weekly deposit
schedule on the next day for the
rest of the year and the following
year.
-
Supplemental Annuity
Work Hour Tax
reported on Form CT–1, is based on
work hours for which compensation is
paid. It is deposited with the first
deposit of Railroad Retirement Tax
otherwise due after the 15th of the
following month.
-
Special Supplemental
Annuity Tax
reported on Form CT–1, is for
employers who are exempt from the
Supplemental Annuity Work Hour Tax.
Taxpayers are notified by the
Railroad Retirement Board when to
deposit the Special Supplemental
Annuity Tax.
-
December 31, 1992 and
prior:
See Exhibit 20.1.4–5 of LEM 20.1.4.
- Form
CT–1 filers, whose tax liability was
$1 million or more in the second
preceding taxable year, must deposit
via electronic funds transfer
(FEDWIRE) payments. For example, for
tax year 1995, the second preceding
taxable year would be 1993.
20.1.4.10.2.2 (07-15-1998)
RRTA (CT–1) April 1, 1991 through
June 30, 1993
- For
periods between April 1, 1991 and
December 31, 1992, see Exhibit
20.1.4–14 for deposit requirements.
During the transition period January
1—June 30, 1993, the old deposit
rules could be used.
- The
new deposit rules became effective
January 1, 1993. See Exhibit
20.1.4–13.
20.1.4.10.3 (07-15-1998)
Special Deposit Rules
-
First Time Exception—See
IRM 20.1.4.
-
Safe Harbor/95 percent/98 percent—See
IRM 20.1.4.
20.1.4.10.4 (07-15-1998)
Computing the FTD Penalty
- Refer
to Form CT–1 deposit requirements. See
IRM 20.1.4.10.3.
- To
determine timely deposits, see
Exhibit 20.1.4–13.
-
Compare the taxpayer’s liability,
using the information from the
Record of Railroad Retirement Tax
Liability (RRTA) and Record of
Railroad Unemployment Repayment
Tax Liability (RURT), with the
deposits made. If the information
is unavailable, use the averaging
method.
- If
there is an overstatement on the
RRTA tax liability, due to a line
adjustment, adjust the last
liability regardless of the dollar
amount.
- If
the return indicates a monthly or
semi-weekly liability of $100,000
or more, refer to IRM
20.1.4.3.2.3.
20.1.4.10.4.1 (07-15-1998)
Periods Ending On or before
December 31, 1992
-
Refer to Exhibit 20.1.4–14 to
determine if deposits are timely and
sufficient.
- See
Exhibit 20.1.4–5 of LEM 20.1.4.
- For
tax period ending
December 31, 1989, ONLY,
see LEM 20.1.4.10.4.2.
-
Certain TC 670 payments do not
require a FTD avoidance penalty.
Master File is programmed to forego
assessing FTD avoidance penalty on
the payments which are uniquely
identified as shown in (a) and (b)
below. Do not
manually compute the FTD avoidance
penalty for the payments identified
as follows:
-
TC 670, Blocking Series 700 (for
taxpayers required to make wire
transfers), and
-
TC 670, RURT (line 14) amounts
only, for tax year ending
December 31, 1989.
-
Combine RRTA and RURT (for periods
ending 9306 and prior) penalty
amounts and assess only one TC 180.
20.1.4.10.4.2 (07-15-1998)
Averaged Penalty
-
Average the tax settlement amount
when the Record of Railroad
Retirement Tax Liability (RRTA-Part
II) and/or Record of Railroad
Unemployment Repayment Tax Liability
(RURT-Part III) is incomplete or
blank.
20.1.4.10.4.2.1 (07-15-1998)
On or After January 1, 1993
-
The method of averaging Part II
will depend on the type of
depositor and the information
available. To compute an averaged
liability:
-
for a
monthly depositor
who has not provided any
liability breakdown, divide
the tax liability by 12, and
assign that amount to each of
the monthly totals.
-
for a
semi-weekly
depositor who has not provided
any liability breakdown,
divide the tax liability by
four to arrive at a quarterly
amount, then divide the
resulting amount by 12, and
assign to the first 4
Wednesdays of each month.
-
for a
semi-weekly
depositor who provided the
monthly RRTA, divide each
month’s tax liability by four,
and assign the four
liabilities to the first four
Wednesdays in that month.
-
When the averaged liability equals
$100,000
or more, assign the liability to
the first day of the first
semi-weekly period ending Friday.
This applies to both the monthly
and semi-weekly depositor. (For
example, Jan 9703—would be Jan 1).
-
CAUTION:
No RURT (Part III) is required to
be paid on or after July 1, 1993.
To average for 1993, use only the
first and second quarter, and
divide by two.
20.1.4.10.4.2.2 (07-15-1998)
On or before December 31, 1992
- To
average RRTA (Part I for tax year
1991 and later) and (Part I for
tax year 1990 and before):
-
Divide the liability by four
to arrive at a quarterly
amount; then divide the
resulting amount by 12, and
assign to eighth-monthly
periods B, D, F, H, J, L, N,
P, R, T, V and X.
-
If
the averaged liability equals
$100,000 or more, assign the
liability to the first day of
the eighth-monthly periods B,
D, F, H, J, L, N, P, R, T, V
and X.
-
Combine the averaged liability
amount and the quarterly
penalty amounts into one total
RRTA penalty amount. Combine
this RRTA penalty amount with
the RURT penalty amount, if
applicable, and assess only
one penalty amount (TC 180).
- If
the Part III RURT liability is
incomplete or blank, divide RURT,
(Part I, for tax year 1991 and
later) and (Part I for tax year
1990 and before) by 4 to arrive at
a quarterly breakdown. Compute the
penalty using the averaged
liability amount.
20.1.4.11
(07-15-1998)
Assessment Procedures
- The
following transactions codes (TC)
identify assessment or abatement of the
FTD Penalty:
- TC
186—computer generated assessment,
- TC
187—computer generated abatement,
- TC
180—manual assessment,
- TC
181—manual abatement.
- Computer
generated assessments result from a
Master File analysis of the account
information.
- Manual
assessments are input through IDRS.
Employees who cannot directly input the
penalty assessment to IDRS need to
prepare an appropriate document to
request input of the assessment. Various
documents are available for this
purpose, such as:
- The
preprinted penalty and interest
block found on some tax forms,
- Form
4844, Request for Terminal Action,
- Form
4364, Delinquency Computations,
- Form
4907, TDA Posting Voucher,
- Form
3870, Request for Adjustment, and
- Form
8485, Assessment Adjustment Case
Record.
- Various
codes are used to identify conditions
regarding the penalty assessment, e.g.,
penalty computation codes, condition
codes, and schedule indicator codes.
20.1.4.11.1 (07-15-1998)
Computer Codes
-
Effective January 1, 1993,
two new codes were created to display
processing information unique to 1993
and subsequent deposit
requirements.
- The
Base Period Code
(BASE–PD) was created to
indicate which deposit schedule was
used for FTD Penalty analysis.
- The
State Code
Indicator (STATE)was
created to indicate the state in which
the taxpayer made FTD deposits.
20.1.4.11.2 (07-15-1998)
Base Period Codes
- The
BASE–PD
codes are:
-
0 = FTD Penalty
Bypassed
A base period code of zero
indicates that the FTD Penalty
computation was bypassed at the
time the return posted, based on
the presence of certain exception
criteria. Examples of
exception
criteria are: The input return
record contains Computer Condition
Code J. (2) The Entity Employment
Code is S (Foreign
Subsidiary)—Forms 940/941/943/945.
Refer to LEM 20.1.4.2.2.
-
1 = Monthly
Depositor
-
2 = Semi-weekly
Depositor
-
3 =
Monthly/Daily/Semi-weekly
Depositor
A monthly depositor who must make
a $100,000 or more (daily) deposit
immediately becomes a semi-weekly
depositor for the remainder of the
current year and for the following
calendar year.
-
4 =
Semi-weekly/Daily/Semi-weekly
Depositor
Semi-weekly depositors who incur a
$100,000 or more (daily) deposit
requirement return to a
semi-weekly deposit schedule after
the daily deposit is made.
- To
manually change the Base Period Code
(BASE–PD) use CC REQ77, TC 971 and
action code, for the quarter affected.
-
Use action code
40 to change Base
Period Code (BASE–PD) to 1.
[TC971/151–CD] Overlay CD with 40.
-
Use action code
41 to change Base
Period Code (BASE–PD) to 2.
[TC971/151–CD] Overlay CD with 41.
-
The TC 971 with action code 40 or
41 is displayed on TXMOD and all
transcripts.
- The
purpose of allowing a change to the
BASE–PD is to establish an audit trail
on a particular account. The BASE–PD
should be changed only in limited
situations. For example:
-
The Service may determine that the
employer should not be allowed to
continue as a monthly depositor.
-
The employer may submit
information that would warrant a
change to the account (e.g., a
semi-weekly depositor elects to
report and deposit back-up
withholding separately from the
other taxes reported on Form 941
thus changing the amount of tax
liability in the lookback period
[tax years 1993 and prior]).
-
The TC 150 belongs on another TIN
or tax period.
20.1.4.11.2.1 (07-15-1998)
State Code Indicator
- The
STATE
Code Indicator is entered on Form
941 by the taxpayer to show the
state in which deposits are made. If
the taxpayer deposits in more than
one state, the multiple state
depositor (MU) code is entered. The
State Code Indicator is displayed on
TXMOD and transcripts.
-
State legal holidays are
non-banking days in the
determination of deposit due
dates.
-
If the state code is MU, Master
File will systemically compute
the penalty following the
Federal holidays only calendar.
-
Information (regarding the state
in which a penalized deposit was
made) must be provided by the
taxpayer before making any
adjustment to the penalty
amount.
- See
IRM Part III Terminal Responses, for
CC FTDPN guidelines and a list of
state banking holidays.
20.1.4.11.2.2 (07-15-1998)
Penalty Computation Codes (PCC)
-
Penalty Computation Codes (PCC)
identify conditions which affect the
penalty computation. This
information is useful when
responding to taxpayer inquiries or
when making subsequent adjustments.
-
Computer assessed FTD penalties
generate the applicable PCC’s.
-
Manually assessed FTD penalties
require manual input of the
applicable PCC. The PCC should be
entered on the FTD penalty
assessment or adjustment document.
- The
PCC is listed with the literal FTD
PEN below the penalty amount on IDRS
(TXMOD and ACTRA). Master File
Transcripts (MFTRA) and balance due
notices also display a PCC.
-
Definitions for the various PCCs are
as follows:
-
PCC 03
applies when assessing the FTD
penalty with specific liability
and payment information, (e.g.,
computing with a complete ROFT).
-
PCC 11
applies when assessing the FTD
penalty on averaged tax
liability information.
-
PCC 18
applies when charging the FTD
penalty on a CAWR assessment.
-
PCC 41
applies when assessing the FTD
penalty for avoiding the deposit
system and the following
conditions exist: No FTD’s were
made, and the taxpayer provided
good liability information.
-
PCC 42
applies when assessing the FTD
penalty for avoiding the deposit
system and the following
conditions exist: The taxpayer
made both deposits (TC 650) and
unauthorized payments (TC
670/610), and the taxpayer
provided good liability
information.
-
PCC 43
applies when assessing the FTD
penalty for avoiding the deposit
system and the following
conditions exist: FTD’s were
made, and the tax liability is
averaged.
-
PCC 44
applies when assessing the FTD
penalty for avoiding the deposit
system and the following
conditions exist: The taxpayer
made both deposits (TC 650) and
unauthorized payments (TC
670/610), and the tax liability
is averaged.
-
PCC 54
applies when assessing the FTD
penalty on averaged tax
liability information and the
following conditions exist: A
semi-weekly depositor provided a
monthly ROFT, and the taxpayer
made insufficient or late
deposits (TC 650).
-
PCC 55
applies when assessing the FTD
penalty on averaged tax
liability information and the
following conditions exist: A
semi-weekly depositor provided a
monthly ROFT, and the taxpayer
made unauthorized payments (TC
670/610).
-
PCC 56
applies when assessing the FTD
penalty on averaged tax
liability information and the
following conditions exist: A
semi-weekly depositor provided a
monthly ROFT, and the taxpayer
made insufficient or late
deposits (TC 650) and
unauthorized payments (TC
670/610).
-
PCC 57
applies when assessing the FTD
penalty on averaged tax
liability information and the
following conditions exist: An
averaged monthly tax liability
of $100,000 or more, and the
taxpayer made insufficient or
late deposits for tax periods
beginning on or after January 1,
1993 (Forms 941, 943, and CT–1).
-
PCC 58
applies when assessing the FTD
penalty on averaged tax
liability information and the
following conditions exist: An
averaged monthly tax liability
of $100,000 or more, and the
taxpayer made insufficient or
late deposits for tax periods
beginning January 1, 1991
through December 31, 1992 (Forms
941, 943 and CT–1).
-
Beginning January 1, 1993,
PCC’s 54, 55,
56, 57, and 58 are
available for use to address penalty
assessments based on averaged
computations related to 1993 and
later deposit rules and $100,000 or
more liabilities. Although codes 54,
55, and 56 appear on Master File
records, they default to PCC 11 on
notices. See Exhibit 20.1.4–15.
-
Before March 31, 1991,
PCC’s 42, 43,
and 44 were not
available. When the conditions
represented by these PCC’s were
present, PCC 41 was used with either
PCC 03 or PCC 11, as applicable.
These multiple PCC’s display only on
Master File records (MFTRA, ACTRA,
and MCC transcripts). IDRS records
(TXMOD) display only one PCC. When
the account involves multiple PCC’s,
PCC 41 takes precedence and is
displayed on TXMOD.
20.1.4.11.2.3 (07-15-1998)
Penalty Indicator Codes (PIC)
-
Penalty indicator codes identify the
status of the penalty assessment
related to the 15 percent rate. The
penalty indicator code is listed
below the penalty computation code.
-
Valid penalty indicator codes are as
follows:
-
00 applies when the 15 percent
penalty rate is not applicable,
-
01 applies when the account is a
potential 15 percent penalty,
and
-
02 applies when the 15 percent
rate is assessed.
20.1.4.11.2.4 (07-15-1998)
Computer Condition Codes (CCC)
-
Computer condition codes are
assigned by tax examiners or are
computer generated during the
processing of the return. They
identify a special condition or
computation for the computer.
Computer condition codes post to the
master file.
-
Condition code "J" is used when
information from the return
indicates the FTD penalty is to be
waived. It prevents the computer
from generating an FTD penalty.
20.1.4.11.2.5 (07-15-1998)
Schedule Indicator Codes (SIC)
-
Schedule indicator codes (SIC)
identify conditions that may affect
FTD penalty computations.
-
Because no more than one SIC can be
entered on any one return, SICs will
be edited in the following priority
order: 5, 6, 3, 4, 2, 1, 0. A return
with a SIC other than 1 or 0 could
have more than one applicable
condition.
- The
presence of some SIC’s prevent the
computer from determining a penalty
amount. Instead, Master File
generates a CP–194, Possible FTD
Penalty Notice. The Service Center
manually reviews all CP 194
accounts.
- The
literal "SIC" displays numeric 0
through 6 in the return record and
on all transcripts for returns
posting in cycle 8903 or later. The
number indicates which condition
applies.
- See
Exhibit 20.1.4–16 for past and
current definitions of SIC codes.
20.1.4.11.2.5.1 (07-15-1998)
SIC Indicator 0
-
SIC 0—Master
File may generate a CP 194 notice
on an account with a 0 indicator.
This means conditions exist, other
than those identified by SIC’s 1
through 6, that require manual
review of the account.
-
The reason Master File generates a
CP 194 with a 0 indicator may not
be clearly evident, since SIC 0
means the return has a valid ROFT
for computing the penalty.
-
If
the tax return shows valid
ROFT information, use the ROFT
figures to compute and assess
the penalty.
-
If
the tax return shows invalid
ROFT information, compute the
averaged liability and propose
the penalty.
-
If
the return is not available:
use the ROFT figures from the
account transcript (TXMOD), if
those figures
are
valid. If the
figures
are not valid or if
the ROFT information is not
available, average the
liability. Send Letter 313C,
and the appropriate form or
schedule to the taxpayer.
20.1.4.11.2.5.2 (07-15-1998)
SIC Indicator 1
-
SIC 1—The
original tax return is not
required, because SIC "1"
indicates that the return does not
have a complete and accurate ROFT.
- In
most instances, when a SIC 1 is
input to a return, Master File
computed the penalty by averaging
the tax and generates a CP 207
notice (Proposed Averaged Penalty)
to the taxpayer.
20.1.4.11.2.5.3 (07-15-1998)
SIC Indicator 2
-
SIC 2—If
Master File generated the CP 194
because a reasonable cause
statement is attached to the
return, follow procedures for
processing reasonable cause
requests. See IRM 20.1.4.16. If
the taxpayer does not meet
reasonable cause criteria, assess
the penalty.
-
For periods ended December 31,
1992 and prior, if Master File
generated the CP 194 because the
taxpayer checked the 95 percent
Rule box on the return, refer to
the Safe Harbor provisions when
computing the penalty and assess
the penalty, as applicable.
-
For return periods prior to 1993,
if the return is not available and
the tax liability (TC 150) is
$10,000 or greater, assume the 2
indicator is present because Safe
Harbor provisions apply.
- If
the return is not available, use
ROFT figures from the account
transcript. If those figures are
not valid or if the ROFT
information is not available,
average the liability.
20.1.4.11.2.5.4 (07-15-1998)
SIC Indicator 3
-
SIC 3—This
SIC is not applicable after
December 31, 1993.
-
Refer to procedures for computing
a penalty which involves backup
withholding.
-
Use ROFT information on the return
and/or Schedule A. Assess the
penalty, as applicable.
- If
the return and/or Schedule A is
not available or is inaccurate,
average the liability.
20.1.4.11.2.5.5 (07-15-1998)
SIC Indicator 4
-
SIC 4—This
SIC is not applicable after
December 31, 1992. Refer to
Exhibit 20.1.4–16.
-
Refer to the "First-Time
Exception" procedures under the
special deposit rules for the
applicable tax form.
- If
the taxpayer does not qualify for
the "First-Time Exception" ,
compute the penalty without regard
to the exception and send Letter
1447C.
- If
the taxpayer qualifies, follow
procedures for computing the
penalty when the "First-Time
Exception" applies.
- If
the return is not available, use
ROFT figures from the account
transcript. If those figures are
not valid or if the ROFT
information is not available,
average the liability. Send Letter
313C, and the appropriate form or
schedule to the taxpayer.
20.1.4.11.2.5.6 (07-15-1998)
SIC Indicators
5, 6 7
-
SIC 5—This
SIC is not applicable after
December 31, 1992. Refer to
Exhibit 20.1.4–16.
-
SIC 6—This
is generated when the averaged
liability amount is $100,000 or
more.
-
SIC 7—(Effective
on or after 9503). Penalty was
computed by averaging a $100,000
account.
-
Follow procedures for working CP
194 Notices with SIC Indicators 5,
6 or 7.
20.1.4.11.3 (07-15-1998)
CP 194 Notices
- Master
File generates a Possible FTD Penalty
Notice, CP 194, for the following:
-
Returns with Schedule Indicator
Codes (SIC) input during the code
and edit phase of return
processing.
-
Certain 941, 943, 945, 940, 720
and 1042 filers
-
Form CT–1
-
Form 941M, if the filing
requirement is 10.
-
Forms 941E, 941PR, 941SS, 943PR,
and 940PR for the Philadelphia
Service Center (PSC) only, when
they meet the conditions in (a)
and (b) above.
-
Issuance of the CP 194 means the
service center
must review the account and
manually calculate the penalty.
Whenever possible,
telephone contact with
the taxpayer should be used to resolve
the CP 194 issue.
- The
service center must process CP 194
notices within 45 calendar days of the
IRS Received Date. This includes
issuing Letter 313C to the taxpayer.
- Master
File generates 2 copies of the CP 194
notice. The Service Center Files area
receives the notices and secures the
original related return. One copy of
the notice is attached to the tax
return and the other is used as the
return charge out. If the Files area
does not send the original return,
proceed as follows:
- If
Files attaches an incorrect tax
return, send the return (with the
CP 194) back to Files and request
the correct return.
- If
Files did not attach a return,
review the charge out information
or IDRS to determine if the tax
return is in another function. If
so, contact that area to secure a
copy of the return.
- If
neither the original return nor a
copy is available, follow
instructions for averaging the tax
liability. (Refer to computation
procedures for the applicable
return.)
- If the
case has other freeze conditions,
coordinate with the appropriate area
for resolution.
20.1.4.11.3.1 (07-15-1998)
Working CP 194 Notices
-
On CP 194 notice
accounts that show a balance due,
conduct the following IDRS research.
This helps ensure that credit
posting problems are identified and
corrected before computing the
penalty.
-
Review the account transcript (TXMOD)
to see if any timely deposits
posted after the generation of
CP 194 notice.
-
Review TXMOD for other tax
periods to see if there is a
misapplied deposit intended for
the period in question.
-
Review CFOL, IDRS, ect. for the
FTD Credit Module (01 0000), to
see if it has a deposit intended
for the current period.
-
Review UPTIN for the EIN to see
if any deposits are unpostable.
-
Review URINQ/XSINQ for the name
control to see if any credits
are in the Unidentified or
Excess Collections accounts.
-
Review EINAD for any other TINs
assigned to this employer.
-
On CP 194 notice
accounts with a credit balance,
conduct the following IDRS research.
-
Check for any pending
assessments. If a TC 976 is
present, a duplicate return (or
amended return) has posted. Hold
the CP 194 notice until the CP
193 notice generates. (Master
File generates a CP 193 when a
duplicate or amended return
posts to an account). Follow
local procedures for associating
multiple cases.
-
Check for other control bases.
If one is present, coordinate
with the other area.
-
Check for debit balances on
other account periods to see if
the credit posted in error. If
so, transfer the payment(s).
- See
LEM 20.1.4.1.5.1.
20.1.4.11.3.2 (07-15-1998)
Computing the FTD Penalty
- Each
return type has its own format for
capturing the information needed to
determine if the tax reported on the
return has been deposited/paid
timely and correctly. Refer to the
"Computing the FTD Penalty" section
under the appropriate tax form for
which the CP 194 generated.
20.1.4.11
Assessment Procedures
20.1.4.11.3
CP 194 Notices
20.1.4.11.3.3 (09-10-1999)
Proposing the FTD Penalty
-
Propose the FTD Penalty on CP 194
accounts when computing the penalty
based on ROFT or Record of Net Tax (RONT)
information that is or may be
inaccurate.
-
EXCEPTION: DO NOT
propose the penalty in the following
circumstances:
-
If the penalty is entirely due
to direct payments (TC 610
and/or 670) , the 10 percent
penalty applies. If these are
mandated EFTPS for the time
period 7/1/97 – 12/30/99, there
is no avoidance penalty
(administrative waiver). Also
see 4.16.2 (6) of this IRM.
Corrected ROFT information would
not decrease the amount of the
penalty. Send the Letter 1447C
(for periods 199212 and prior),
or Letter 2782 (for periods
beginning after 199212). Close
the case.
-
For Forms 720, periods ending
March 31, 1991 and prior: if
Form 4977 information would not
affect the penalty, do not send
any letter. Assess and close the
case.
- To
propose the penalty, correspond with
the taxpayer using Letter 313C. See
Exhibit 20.1.4–17 for the
appropriate enclosure form.
20.1.4.11.4 (07-15-1998)
313C Letters
- When
proposing a penalty, send Letter 313C,
which is printed in triplicate.
-
Enclose the appropriate form (see
Exhibit 20.1.4–17) with the two
copies mailed to the taxpayer.
Include the appropriate
Supplemental Record of Federal Tax
Liability, instead of Form 4977,
when the $100,000 rule (SIC 5 or
6) is the issue.
-
Suspend the third copy with the CP
194 notice.
-
When assessing the penalty: DO NOT
send Letter 313C in the following
circumstances:
- If
the penalty is entirely due to
direct payments, the 10 percent
penalty applies. Send the Letter
1447C (for periods 9212 and
prior), or Letter 2782 (for
periods beginning after 9212).
Close the case.
-
For Forms 720, periods ending
March 31, 1991 and prior: if Form
4977 information would not affect
the penalty, do not send any
letter. Assess and close the case.
20.1.4.11.4.1 (07-15-1998)
Replies to Letters
-
Associate the taxpayer’s reply with
the suspense copy. If not located,
the case may have been processed as
a "No Reply" .
- If
taxpayer provides a completed Record
of Federal Tax (ROFT) liability
schedule.
-
Recompute the penalty.
-
Assess or adjust the penalty, if
required.
-
Inform the taxpayer of the
correct penalty amount, the
reason for the adjustment and
the correct balance due.
-
Taxpayer provides an unacceptable
ROFT or other correspondence.
-
Contact the taxpayer to explain
why the information provided by
the taxpayer is unacceptable.
-
Include a new Form 4977 or
Schedule B. Highlight pertinent
areas if it would help the
taxpayer.
-
Advise the taxpayer that if we
do not receive acceptable
information within 20 days, the
proposed penalty amount will be
assessed.
-
Suspend the case for 30 days.
20.1.4.11.4.2 (07-15-1998)
No Response Cases
- If
the taxpayer does not reply within
the suspense period, research IDRS
to see if a duplicate/amended (TC
976) filing condition is present.
(TC 976 usually generates
CP193/293).
-
A taxpayer may re-submit a tax
return with a completed ROFT
rather than complete the Form
4977 or Schedule B that was sent
with the 313C letter.
-
If a duplicate filing condition
is present, refer to adjustment
guidelines (IRM Part III,
General DP Adjustments) for
procedures for working multiple
issues.
- For
no response cases, assess the
averaged penalty.
20.1.4.11.4.3 (07-15-1998)
15 Percent Tier Penalty
- When
assessing an FTD Penalty as a result
of a Letter 313C and the 15 percent
tier penalty
may be applicable:
-
Use blocking series 000–099 to
indicate a refile DLN (original
return or mag tape facsimile is
available), or
-
use blocking series 150–159 to
indicate a non-refile DLN.
- When
assessing an FTD Penalty as a result
of a Letter 313C and the 15 percent
tier penalty is
not applicable, (e.g.,
when the account is full paid):
-
Use blocking series 130–139 to
indicate a refile DLN (original
return or mag tape facsimile is
available), or
-
use blocking series 140–149 to
indicate a non-refile DLN.
-
Use of blocking series 130/149
will prevent the issuance of CP
294 which indicates that the 15
percent rate may be applicable.
20.1.4.11.5 (09-10-1999)
CP 207 Notices
- Master
File generates CP 207 notices to
propose an averaged FTD Penalty for
certain 941, 940, 945, and 1042 filers
when:
-
The ROFT section of the return was
incomplete/illegible, or
-
the total tax liability did not
equal the net taxes. See LEM
20.1.4.11.5. Negative liability
amount on the return will not be
transcribed as it reflects an
invalid entry. This will often
cause the liability not to equal
the net tax. It is especially
important to contact the taxpayer
if this is the situation, so they
will understand that is impossible
to have a negative liability—an
adjustment may reduce subsequent
liability(ies) to zero, but never
below.
- If the
account has a balance due, credit
balance, or math error rather than
generate a CP207, Master File assesses
the FTD Penalty, with penalty
Computation Code 11 (TC 186, PCC 11),
and issues the first notice.
- If the
account shows that the tax is paid,
Master File generates the proposed
penalty taxpayer notice and "holds"
the FTD Penalty assessment action for
15 cycles (weeks).
- If
there is no reply to a CP 207 or if
the reply is not resolved and posted
to Master File within 15 cycles
(weeks) (after issuance of the CP
207), Master File will systemically
assess an averaged penalty (TC186).
- If
possible, contact the taxpayer by
telephone to resolve an issue before
the penalty is
automatically/systemically assessed.
- If the
CP 207 is resolved orally by securing
a faxed copy of the Schedule B, the
form must be signed and dated at the
bottom of the schedule. The following
actions are NOT acceptable:
-
Accepting liability information
verbally and inputting this
information as Schedule B and
eliminating or reducing the
penalty.
- A
faxed mag tape record from a
payroll service is not a closing
document.
-
Abating or reducing the penalty
because the taxpayer is mandated
EFTPS. The Schedule B is required.
20.1.4.11.5.1 (09-10-1999)
Replies to Notices
-
Replies to CP 207 notices must be
resolved by the 11th cycle after
generation of the notice to allow
time for posting and correction of
unpostables before the automatic 15
cycle (week) hold expires.
- If
the taxpayer provides a completed
Record of Federal Tax (ROFT)
liability schedule:
-
Compute the penalty based on the
taxpayer’s figures.
-
If no penalty applies, input a
TC 180.00 to prevent systemic
assessment of the averaged
penalty.
-
If there is no change to the
proposed penalty amount, allow
the computer to assess the
penalty. Associate the reply
with the return.
-
If the penalty applies but is
different from the proposed
penalty, assess the penalty and
send an explanation to the
taxpayer.
-
Taxpayer provides an
unacceptable ROFT or other
correspondence.
-
Because this information will
not change the proposed penalty
amount, allow the computer to
assess the averaged penalty.
-
Explain why the information
provided by the taxpayer is
unacceptable. Include a new Form
4977 or Schedule B. Highlight
pertinent areas if it would help
the taxpayer.
-
Advise the taxpayer to submit
the necessary information after
receipt of the penalty
assessment notice. Include Form
4977 [for period 19 9212 and
prior], or Schedule B [for
periods beginning after 199212].
-
Associate the reply with the
return.
-
Taxpayer claims
first-time exception (prior to
December 31, 1992)
or reasonable cause with or without
providing a liability schedule.
-
If the taxpayer claims the
"first-time exception," refer to
computation procedures for
first-time exception.
-
If the taxpayer claims
reasonable cause, follow
procedures for processing
reasonable cause requests.
-
If we need additional
information for a reasonable
cause determination, proceed as
follows: Send Letter 1382C for
additional information, if there
is enough time to receive the
reply and input the resulting
adjustment by the 11th week
after generation of CP 207. If
there is not enough time to
prevent systemic assessment of
the penalty, advise the taxpayer
to submit the information after
receipt of the penalty
assessment notice.
-
If the taxpayer does not qualify
for the "first-time exception"
or does not establish reasonable
cause, compute the penalty using
the figures the taxpayer
provided. If the taxpayer did
not provide an acceptable ROFT,
follow procedures in (3) above.
-
Taxpayer submits Form
941C or other adjustment information.
If an averaged penalty resulted
because the ROFT did not agree with
the TC 150, the taxpayer may reply
with an amended return.
-
For Form 941C procedures, refer
to BMF Adjustment procedures in
IRM Part III, BMF DP
Adjustments.
-
If the new tax and ROFT figures
do not agree, follow procedures
in (3) above.
20.1.4.11.5.2 (07-15-1998)
Late Replies to Notices
- If
the taxpayer provides the corrected
ROFT information after the 11th
cycle (week) but before automatic
assessment (15th cycle), compute the
correct penalty. If the correct
penalty differs from the proposed
penalty, see LEM 20.1.4.11.5.2.
-
Inform the taxpayer that we did not
receive the reply in time to prevent
the penalty from being automatically
assessed and that we will adjust the
account and issue a corrected
notice.
-
Suspend the case until the TC 186
posts and then input the appropriate
TC 18X, or
- If
the reply is received after Master
File automatically assesses the
penalty (TC186), adjust the penalty
as appropriate.
20.1.4.11.6 (07-15-1998)
Reserved
20.1.4.11.7 (07-15-1998)
CP 294 Notices
- Under
the four tier penalty system, the 15
percent penalty rate is applied to the
balance due (tax only) that remains
unpaid after notice and demand for the
FTD penalty (e.g., 23–C date plus 10
days). The fourth tier is not
assessed, if the FTD penalty (TC 186)
was not previously assessed. See LEM
20.1.4.11.7.1.
- For
systemic FTD penalty assessments,
Master File:
-
Identifies modules with tax owing,
-
marks the FTD penalty (TC186) as a
potential 15 percent penalty (PIC
01), generates a CP 294, and
-
sets a deferred action code (DA)
that expires in five cycles.
- After
expiration of the DA, Master File
reanalyzes the account. If payment of
the outstanding tax has not been
received, Master File will generate
the TC 186 for the fourth tier amount,
and generate the appropriate taxpayer
notice.
- Master
File cannot review, recompute or set
indicators on any account where there
is a TC 180 present. If you have
adjusted an account where the
additional fourth tier penalty may
apply, suspend or otherwise monitor
that account for the appropriate
number of cycles. Manually assess the
fourth tier penalty amount or close
the case as appropriate.
20.1.4.11.7.1 (09-10-1999)
Processing Notices
- Upon
receipt of CP 294, the service
centers take the following actions:
-
Review available account
information. Determine net
unpaid tax as of the 23–C date
plus 10 days. Consider only
posted credits to determine net
unpaid tax. Suspend an account
until any pending or unpostable
credits are resolved.
-
See LEM 20.1.4.11.7.1.
- When
the net unpaid tax is determined:
-
Multiply this amount by 5
percent (total penalty is
limited to 15 percent, of which
10 percent has already been
assessed),
-
input TC 180 for the result of
above amount,
-
use the same PCC as in the
original assessment/adjustment.
-
use BS 130/139 when adjusting CP
294 with
original return or
mag tape facsimile, or,
-
use BS 140/149 when adjusting CP
294
without original return.
-
See LEM 20.1.4.11.7.1.
-
Master File generates the
appropriate taxpayer notice.
20.1.4.11.8 (07-15-1998)
Taxpayer Responses
- Be
sure that you are familiar with the
CAUTION
and instructions found at IRM
20.1.4.12.1 before attempting to
respond to any taxpayer requests for
adjustment or explanation of their
account.
20.1.4.11.8.1 (09-10-1999)
"First-Time" Reasonable Cause
Claim
-
Taxpayer claims the "First-Time
Exception" , valid for periods
ending December 31, 1992 and prior.
-
Refer to the "First-Time
Exception" procedures under
special deposit rules for the
applicable return.
-
If the taxpayer does not qualify
for the "First-Time Exception,"
advise the taxpayer of this
determination and that the
penalty amount is valid.
-
If the taxpayer qualifies,
follow procedures for
re-computing the penalty when
the "First-Time Exception"
applies. Adjust the penalty
amount. Notify the taxpayer of
the correct account balance.
-
Taxpayer submits a reasonable cause
statement.
-
Refer to the criteria in IRM
20.1.1.
-
If the taxpayer does not meet
reasonable cause criteria,
follow procedures for denying
reasonable cause requests.
-
If reasonable cause or any other
penalty relief criteria is
established, adjust the penalty
amount. Notify the taxpayer of
the new balance due, if any.
20.1.4.11.8.2 (09-10-1999)
Payment Information
- If
the taxpayer claims the Service did
not properly credit the account,
-
review the cancelled check, bank
data, or other information the
taxpayer provided about the
payment.
-
Determine if the payment posted
correctly to the account.
- If
the deposit is not on the account,
follow the functional procedures for
tracing the payments.
-
Proof of payment for EFTPS (See Rev.
Proc. 97–33).
-
For an ACH debit or credit
entry, a statement prepared by
the taxpayer’s financial
institution showing a transfer
(that is, a decrease to the
taxpayer’s account balance) will
be accepted as proof of payment
if the statement: shows the
amount and the date of the
transfer; and identifies the US
Government as the payee.
-
For an ETA payment, taxpayers
may request that their financial
institution obtain a statement
from the FRB that executed the
transfer. This statement will be
accepted as proof of payment if
the statement: shows the amount
and the date of the transfer;
and identifies the US Government
as the payee.
-
For purposes of this section,
statements prepared by a
financial institution include
statements prepared by a third
party that is contractually
obligated to prepare statements
for the financial
institution.
- If
the payment has posted to the
correct account after Master File
generated the original penalty (TC
186), an automatic recomputation of
the penalty occurs. Notify the
taxpayer that the payment has been
properly applied or that the payment
was properly credited.
- If
the payment posted to the correct
account, after a manually assessed
penalty (TC 180), recompute the
penalty using the latest payment
information.
- If a
payment posted after the 15 percent
rate is in effect, it may not be
necessary to recompute the penalty.
- If
the payment posted, but the
transaction date does not agree with
the information provided, refer to
IRM 20.1.4.14.
- For
information regarding the
application of payments see IRM
20.1.4.
20.1.4.11.8.3 (09-10-1999)
Additional ROFT Information
-
Taxpayers may submit revised ROFT
liability breakdown information.
- A
revised ROFT received may be a reply
to CP 207 or Letter 313.
-
Check TXMOD to determine if
Master File issued a CP 207.
-
Check ENMOD/TXMOD to see if a
service center issued Letter
313C.
-
If either was issued and the
penalty has not been assessed,
coordinate with the FTD Penalty
Function.
-
If neither CP 207 nor Letter
313C was issued, follow
instructions in (3) and (4)
below.
-
Since taxpayers file their returns
under "penalty of perjury" ,
taxpayer requests to revise or add
return information must be resolved
appropriately. Oral requests to
change the dates or liability
amounts on the ROFT are NOT
accepted.
- Upon
receipt of a properly signed
request, recompute the penalty using
the new ROFT information. See LEM
20.1.4.11.8.4.
20.1.4.11.8.4 (09-10-1999)
Amended or Supplemental Return
- When
the taxpayer files an amended or
supplemental return that results in
a tax adjustment, recompute the
penalty using the new tax
information. Assumption: Tax return
and ROFT are correct. Issue new
first notice (CP210/220).
- If a
FTD Penalty is not on the tax
account, compute the penalty on the
new total tax amount and assess the
penalty, as applicable.
DO NOT
assess the FTD Penalty if there is a
reasonable cause indicator on the
account, as follows:
-
Computer Condition Code (CCC)
"J" in the return record, or
-
Transaction Code (TC) 181/180
with RC 62 or a Penalty Reason
Code (PRC).
- If
the taxpayer files an amended return
and does not provide a revised ROFT
and
-
the tax is being increased, use
averaging and assess the penalty
using the appropriate penalty
computation code.
DO
NOT correspond for a
revised ROFT. The Service
includes a blank ROFT form with
Notice 746.
-
If the tax is being partially
decreased, inform the taxpayer
to submit a revised ROFT. Advise
the taxpayer that a revised ROFT
may provide information to
reduce the FTD Penalty.
-
Since we cannot accurately determine
the penalty amount without ROFT
information, adjust the penalty
amount so that the total assessed
FTD Penalty is not higher than 10
percent of the tax liability, 5
percent for periods 198912 through
199103. Don’t assess the additional
5% until the TP receives a
new
first notice.
- The
above instructions apply also to
amended returns received from IRC
section 6020(b) or jeopardy
assessments (Doc. Code 51).
20.1.4.11.9 (09-10-1999)
CAWR and FUTA
-
Combined Annual Wage Reporting (CAWR)
and Federal Unemployment Tax
Adjustment (FUTA) cases are internally
initiated adjustment cases. These Form
941 and 940 subsequent adjustment
cases are worked similarly to amended
returns for the respective forms.
- The
FTD penalty may be assessed whether or
not the adjustment is interest free.
The Internal Revenue Code provides
relief from interest under Section
6205, but not from the FTD penalty.
- See
IRM 20.1.7, Information Returns, for
CAWR Information Return Penalties.
20.1.4.11.9.1 (09-10-1999)
Computation of the FTD Penalty
- If a
taxpayer responds to a CAWR notice
and agrees with the increase to
their taxable amount, or does not
respond and we increase the taxable
amount based on our information,
assess the tax increase as well as
an FTD penalty at 10 percent of the
TC 290 amount using PCC 03 , and
normal penalty considerations and
adjustment procedures.
-
Because the assessment results from
reconciliations with SSA or
information from individual states,
a revised ROFT is not applicable.
Even if submitted, the revised ROFT
would have no penalty impact.
- The
account will then be subject to
normal procedures for monitoring for
the possible assessment of the
additional 5 percent fourth tier
amount.
- At
the expiration of the five cycles,
if the taxpayer has not paid the
full amount of the tax assessed in
(1) above, the fourth tier of the
FTD penalty applies. Assess (TC 180)
an amount equal to 5% of the unpaid
tax (the amount of the tax increase)
and close the case.
- If
the adjustment is for a tax
decrease, check the account for a
prior TC 186 assessment. If the
account has a prior TC 186 or TC
180, input the TC 181 for 10 percent
of the TC 291. The TC 181 cannot
exceed the amount of previously
assessed TC 18X.
20.1.4.12
(07-15-1998)
Computation of All FTD Penalties
- Master
file computes the FTD penalty on
original
liability information only.
- When
credits are transferred in or out or
when a tax adjustment is entered, Master
File will continue to compute the FTD
penalty based on the original liability
information. This can occur even if no
penalty was charged on the original TC
150.
- To
prevent an erroneous systemically
generated TC 186, recompute the correct
FTD penalty manually and post a
restricted TC 18X even if there is no
change to the penalty.
20.1.4.12.1 (07-15-1998)
Manual Adjustments
-
CAUTION:
Before adjusting or abating any FTD
penalty, you must check for conditions
that will prohibit you from taking
action on the account. These
conditions include, but are not
limited to:
-
The case has an open control base
to another service center or
district office.
-
The case has a Large Case (LCI) or
Coordinated Examination Case (CEP)
indicator, or certain freeze
conditions.
-
The control history indicates
recent taxpayer contact, pending
transactions, or penalty waiver
considerations by another area.
- Use CC
REMRQ or BMFOLI to determine the
account location. If the account is
controlled to another area, you
must
coordinate with that area before
adjusting or abating the penalty.
- When
making an adjustment, if the account
is not on the local database, remember
to use CC MFREQ, C so your action will
be immediately available if other
remote sites are researching the same
account.
-
Although computer software is
available for calculating penalties,
you must still know how the penalty is
computed.
-
Effective January 1, 1993,
command code
BMFOL (Business Master
Files On-Line) can be used to research
FTD liability data before manual
computation of FTD penalties. The
BMFOL command code provides additional
on-line IDRS research of master file
tax account data. Several screens will
be displayed based on the input
definer code. See Part III, IDRS
Terminal Responses, for a listing of
screen displays.
- Review
account transcripts (CFOL and IDRS,
etc.) along with any documentation
submitted by the taxpayer (appropriate
liability breakdown form, copy of tax
return, etc). If the information shows
periodic liabilities were incorrectly
entered on the account, recompute the
penalty with the correct liability
information.
- Check
the Penalty Computation Codes (PCC)
and Schedule Indicator Codes (SIC) on
the taxpayer’s account. This may
provide information on how the penalty
was previously computed.
- Use CC
FTDPN to both help determine how the
penalty was computed and to determine
the amount of adjusted penalty. Use
Form 6844 to compute the penalty if
IDRS is not available. If needed,
request the penalty assessment
document to determine the previous
computation procedure.
- An
PIFTD/FTDPN print or other
documentation (e.g., a notation on the
history sheet that the penalty was
computed using FTDPN, when applicable)
should be attached, with the other
source documents, to each IDRS
adjustment.
- To
adjust the penalty, input TC 18X. See
LEM 20.1.4.1.5.1.
- Notify
the taxpayer of the action taken and
the correct account balance.
- It is
important to reconsider the FTD
penalty whenever adjusting the tax
amount. How does the change to tax
affect the ROFT?
- A
partial tax adjustment
does
not cause Master File
to recompute the FTD penalty. A TC
18X must be input to address the
FTD penalty.
-
The presence of a TC 180/181 on
the module will prevent, even a
Total tax decrease, from posting.
Unpostable Code 336, Reason Code 2
(UPC 336, RC 2) identifies these
situations. These unpostables will
be returned to the originator for
reinput of the adjustment with the
corresponding FTD penalty decrease
(TC 181).
-
Master File systemically inputs a
TC 187, only when a
complete tax
decrease is input to a
module which has no FTD
restriction (TC180/181).
20.1.4.12.2 (07-15-1998)
Command Code FTDPN
- The
command code FTDPN may be used on IDRS
to compute the FTD penalty and will
provide the taxpayer with an
explanation of how the FTD penalty was
computed.
- IDRS
CC FTDPN can only be used on 941, 943
and 945 accounts to compute the FTD
penalty.
- CC
FTDPN can compute the penalty on the
total tax for the quarter,
averaged-over the three months of the
quarter, or by using the actual
liability breakdown.
- See
Exhibit 20.1.4–15 for a summary of CC
FTDPN capabilities with its various
definers. Refer to IRM 2.3, IDRS
Terminal Inquiries, for complete
information on IDRS command codes.
20.1.4.12.3 (09-10-1999)
CP 568 FTD Penalty Notice
- CP 568
provides the taxpayer with written
information involving inquiries on FTD
issues and gives an explanation of the
taxpayer’s account using both posted
and pending transactions reflected on
the taxpayer’s account.
- In
order for a computation to be
provided, the specific tax module must
be on IDRS. The CP 568 is generated
from CC FTDPN.
- FTDPN
provides the option to issue a CP 568
at the end of each computation. It can
consist of just text or be accompanied
by a full or partial account
transcript.
- You
can review the CP 568 on line and make
appropriate changes to the letter
before issuance to the taxpayer. These
notices must be 100 percent reviewed
prior to issuance in order to prevent
bad notices due to systemic or tax
examiner error.
- See
IRM 2.3 for more information.
20.1.4.12.4 (07-15-1998)
Form 6844
- The
Form 6844, FTD Computation Worksheet,
may be used as an aid to manually
compute FTD penalty.
20.1.4.13
(07-15-1998)
Reserved
20.1.4.14
(09-10-1999)
Misdated Deposits
- A
discrepancy may exist between the IRS
transaction date of deposit, (TC 650
date) and the taxpayer’s claimed deposit
date. This occurs when:
- The
service center makes an error during
FTD processing,
- the
authorized depositary (bank or a
financial institution) or Treasury’s
Financial Agent (TFA) or Federal
Reserve Bank (FRB) mishandles or
misdates the deposit,
- a
third party delays, mishandles or
misdates the deposit, or
- the
taxpayer uses an unauthorized
depositary.
- To
resolve the discrepancy, determine how
it was caused. If necessary, secure and
review the following items for
FTD.
- IRS
microfilm/microfiche copy of the
FTD,
- IRS
microfilm/microfiche copy of the
Advice of Credit (AOC), and
-
front and back of taxpayer’s
canceled check, bank statement or
bank letter.
- For ACH
CREDITS (EFTPS) secure and review the
following:
- A
statement prepared by their
financial institution indicating (1)
the date taxpayer notified the
institution to make the deposit; (2)
that sufficient funds were present
to satisfy the deposit; (3) the
amount and date of the transfer, and
identifies the US Government as
payee.
- The
financial institution should also be
able to provide a transaction trace
number for the deposit. IRS uses
this trace number to trace the
payment.
-
IMPORTANT—DO
NOT abate an FTD Penalty for date
discrepancies without securing the
necessary documentation.
-
DO NOT change the TC 650
date unless it is an IRS error.
Even though it may be determined that it
was not the taxpayer’s action that
caused the deposit to be late, the audit
trail reflecting the actual date the
deposit was received needs to be
maintained. Relieving the taxpayer of
the late deposit penalty does not change
the fact that the deposit was made late.
20.1.4.14.1 (09-10-1999)
Service Centers
- If the
taxpayer’s receipt, bank letter, or
canceled check agrees with the FTD
date stamp (or encoded date), the AOC
deposit date, and with the TC 650
transaction date, inform the taxpayer
the transaction date is correct. Send
a photocopy of the FTD coupon with
your response.
- When
it can be determined that the delay
occurred because of the financial
institution or the TFA, the taxpayer
will be relieved of the portion of the
penalty due to this delay.
- If the
transaction date does not agree with
the other information above, input a
credit transfer to correct the
transaction date. Do not prepare a
Form 8646.
- No
further action is required if
Master File generated the FTD
Penalty (TC 186) the credit
transfer will entirely reverse the
late deposit penalty. Master File
will recompute the penalty amount
using the corrected deposit dates.
- If
the transfer would only partially
adjust the penalty or if there are
manually assessed penalties (TC
180/181) on the account, recompute
the penalty using the new TC 650
transaction date. Make any
necessary adjustments to the
penalty amount.
20.1.4.14.1.1 (09-10-1999)
Authorized Depositaries
- To
avoid deposit penalties employers
must have made their required
deposits through a Federal Reserve
Bank (FRB), an authorized depositary
(bank or financial institution), or
electronically using one of
Treasury’s Financial Agents (TFA).
To determine if the taxpayer used an
authorized depositary, check the
following:
-
compare the check payee’s name
(or issuer of the receipt),
-
date stamp name (on the FTD
coupon), and
-
the Advice of Credit (AOC) name.
- If
the names change anywhere between
steps above, the taxpayer may have
used an unauthorized
depositary. See IRM 20.1.4.14.1.4.
- To
determine if the check payee, is an
authorized depositary, contact: The
Interagency Coordinator (IAC) in the
service center Accounting Branch or,
consult the latest Commercial Bank
Address File (CBAF).
- A
taxpayer will receive a FTD penalty
whether the deposit is timely made
to an authorized depositary, or
deposited electronically,
if
the depositary delays in forwarding
the deposit to the Treasury. When it
is determined that the delay
occurred after being received by the
authorized depositary or the TFA,
the taxpayer is relieved of the
portion of the penalty due to this
delay.
-
DO NOT prepare a credit transfer
to change the date of the
misdated deposit. Overlay the
deposit date on deposit screen
of FTDPN to determine what the
penalty would have been if the
deposit had not been delayed.
-
Give the taxpayer credit for the
date on the receipt or the date
on the back of the cancelled
check. (If both a bank receipt
and cancelled check are
provided, use the earlier date.)
-
Adjust the deposit penalty using
correct PRC in the fourth
penalty reason code position.
NOTE: This is not penalty relief
due to reasonable cause.
-
In the remarks section of the
adjustment document identify the
deposit that was misdated
(transaction date and amount)
and enter the date used to
recompute the penalty.
-
Do not abate the interest on
these accounts.
-
Prepare and process Form 8646 for
referral to the Financial Management
Service (FMS). Upon receipt of the
Form 8646, FMS will initiate penalty
action against the bank (authorized
financial institution or TFA).
-
The contact point for misdated
payments and the location of the
Forms 8646 Centralized File are
determined by the service
center. The Inter-Agency
Coordinator (IAC) in Accounting
Branch, the FTD Coordinator in
Management Staff, the FTD
Penalty Unit, or other service
center location may be
responsible for maintaining the
centralized file and/or
coordinating with Financial
Management Service (FMS).
-
The Form 8646, Checklist to
Identify Delays in Processing
Federal Tax Deposits, is a
multi-use form used to document
examples of cases concerning
misdated FTD’s. Prepare one 8646
for each taxpayer. Multiple TLNs
may be listed in the Transmittal
Locator Number (TLN) box. If
necessary, continue in the
remarks section.
-
Enter the employee number, date,
and appropriate remarks, such as
"authorized depositary-delay in
forwarding of funds" in the
remarks section.
-
Route one copy with attachments
to the coordinator in your
service center.
- When
Forms 8646 are received from the
operational areas by an Inter-Agency
Coordinator (IAC) in Accounting
Branch, the FTD Coordinator in
Management Staff, or the FTD Penalty
Unit, the following items (at a
minimum) must be reviewed:
-
Timeliness of the Form 8646’s
submission,
-
Appropriateness of referral. FMS
can only take action against
banks (authorized financial
institutions). Therefore, reject
any cases resulting from service
center processing errors or from
mishandling by reporting agents.
-
Clarity of the attachments. FMS
supplies the photocopies to the
depositary as "proof" of the
infraction and as documentation
for the penalty charge.
Therefore, it is critical that
the dates, etc., are legible. If
the copies cannot be read, they
cannot be used by FMS.
- Once
a month, cases are forwarded to FMS
by the Service Center contact. A
transmittal memorandum is used to
identify the number of cases being
forwarded.
-
Route the cases to:
Financial
Management Service, Financial
Services Division, 401 14th
Street, SW-Room 309–A,
Washington, DC 20227.
-
At the same time, forward a
copy
of the transmittal memo
and
a statement of the total amount
of penalties abated to the
Office of Penalty and Interest
Administration, 1111
Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20224,
OP:EX:ST:P, Room 2413–IR.
- On
occasion, the bank may submit
payment for the amount of the FTD
Penalty due on a taxpayer’s account
because of the bank’s mishandling.
Because the taxpayer has been
relieved of the penalty and the bank
will be penalized by FMS (not IRS).
Follow the instructions in IRM Part
III for preparing a manual refund in
situations which require the
issuance of a refund to a name or
address other than the one on Master
File.
20.1.4.14.1.2 (07-15-1998)
Third Party
-
Third parties are those individuals
or companies who make deposits
and/or file returns for clients
electronically, by magnetic tape, or
by paper. This includes reporting
agents, payroll processors or bulk
processors. They receive approval to
work with the Service by filing a
Reporting Agents Authorization, Form
8655.
-
However, this does not allow the
third party to act as an "authorized
depositary" for the Treasury.
-
Whenever a deposit is made late, a
penalty is due. If an authorized
depositary (bank) or government
financial agent has caused the
delay, the taxpayer may be relieved
of the FTD penalty because a penalty
is assessed against the bank’s TT&L
account. However, there are no
penalties that either the IRS or FMS
can assess against a reporting agent
(third party) when they have delayed
the submission of their client’s
monies to authorized depositaries
(because they do not have a TT&L
account).
-
Depending on the agreement the
taxpayer/client has with the third
parties, taxpayers may not have
copies of canceled checks. However,
their bank statements will show the
date the third party withdrew funds
from the taxpayer’s account.
20.1.4.14.1.3 (09-10-1999)
Third Party Mishandling
- When
third parties submit FTDs, they are
depositing funds withdrawn from the
taxpayer’s account. These funds
should then pass through the third
party’s account to an authorized
depositary. Therefore, the removal
of funds from a taxpayer’s account:
-
Does not in and of itself
constitute a tax deposit, and
-
the taxpayer remains liable for
a deposit until funds have been
placed in the control of either
Treasury or its authorized
depositary. This applies to
paper, mag tape and Electronic
Funds Transfer (EFT) deposit
systems.
- To
determine whether or not a penalty
is appropriate, the following
comparisons are necessary: If the
date on the bank statement differs
from the Advice of Credit (AOC) and
FTD dates (TC 650) on the IRS
microfiche copies, then the third
party timely transferred the funds
from the taxpayer’s account,
but did not
timely transmit them to the
authorized depositary as required.
Consequently, the third party, not
Treasury, had use of the taxpayer’s
funds.
- In
this instance:
-
the penalty is correct and
should remain on the taxpayer’s
account.
-
DO NOT CHANGE
the TC 650 date or abate the FTD
penalty.
- In
addition, if the date on the bank
statement and the date of the AOC
differ, and the TC 650 and the date
on the AOC also differ, then the
bank has further delayed the
submission of this money.
-
Follow instructions above for
resolving Misdated Deposits;
Authorized Depositaries.
- Any
remaining penalty would be based on
the length of time the agent held
the funds.
-
Request for abatement should be
closed on the appropriate adjustment
document, using a TC 290 for zero,
BS 98 or 99, with RC 62.
- This
transaction indicates the denial of
"a request for abatement of the FTD
penalty because of a third party’s
error or delay" .
20.1.4.14.1.4 (09-10-1999)
Unauthorized Depositaries
- When
the taxpayer uses an unauthorized
depositary, there may be a
difference between the taxpayer’s
payment date and the FTD transaction
date. This is because the
unauthorized depositary cashed the
taxpayer’s check and then submitted
its own payment to an authorized
depositary.
- When
this occurs, advise the taxpayer
that they used an unauthorized
depositary. Explain the penalty for
using an unauthorized depositary and
avoiding the FTD system. Advise the
taxpayer to contact their area
Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) to get a
listing of local authorized
financial institutions. If the
taxpayer cannot locate a FRB, refer
the taxpayer to the number listed.
-
Taxpayer Service Toll-Free
Number 1–800–829–1040.
-
Telecommunications Device for
the Deaf (TDD) 1–800–829–4059.
- The
penalty may be waived if this is the
first time the taxpayer used an
unauthorized depositary.
-
Review the taxpayer’s two prior
tax modules and check the
centralized file of Forms 8646
to determine if IRS previously
contacted the taxpayer about the
use of unauthorized
depositaries.
-
If this is the first time the
taxpayer has used an
unauthorized depositary, give
the taxpayer credit for the
deposit as of the date on the
receipt or the date on the back
of the cancelled check.
-
If both a bank receipt and
cancelled check are provided,
use the earlier date.
-
Prepare a credit transfer to
correct the transaction codes
from the subsequent payment (TC
670) to a deposit (TC 650).
- If
we previously contacted the taxpayer
about the use of unauthorized
depositories,
DO NOT abate the FTD
Penalty. Follow procedures in (2)
above.
-
Whether or not this is the first
time the taxpayer used an
unauthorized depositary, prepare
Form 8646.
-
In this case the Form 8646 will
not be sent to FMS but will be
used (internally within the
service center) to document that
a particular taxpayer has used
unauthorized depositories.
Because taxpayers may use
different banks to make their
FTD’s, Forms 8646 are to be
filed in TIN order.
-
Prepare the Form 8646 and be
sure to include the following:
TIN and name control in the TLN
box, "unauthorized
depositary—taxpayer informed" ,
employee number and date in the
remarks section.
-
Route one copy of the completed
Form 8646 to the centralized
file area.
-
Once a month, these forms should
be summarized and the total
number of abated penalties and
the related dollar amount should
be sent to the Office of Penalty
and Interest Administration,
OP:EX:ST:P, Room 2413–IR.
20.1.4.14.2 (07-15-1998)
FTD as Subsequent Payment
-
Occasionally, financial institutions
forward one check with the FTD coupons
to cover the checks received from the
taxpayers. When this occurs, the
credit will show as a TC 670 on the
taxpayer’s account.
- If
there is a discrepancy between the
IRS transaction date (TC 670) and
the taxpayer’s claimed deposit
date, review the canceled check
and any other information the
taxpayer provides.
-
Determine if the check payee (or
issuer of the receipt) is an
authorized depositary.
- If
the check was made to an
authorized depositary, follow
procedures in IRM 20.1.4.14.1.1,
and compare the cancellation date
on the back of the check with the
IRS transaction date. If both
agree, inform the taxpayer that
the IRS received date is correct.
Change the transaction code to TC
650. If the dates differ, input a
credit transfer to change the
transaction code to TC 650 and to
change the transaction date to the
cancellation date on the back of
the check. Manually adjust the
penalty only when there is a
restriction (TC 180/181) on the
account.
-
Taxpayer’s deposits may be posted as a
TC 670 because they did not use funds
that could be considered "immediate
credit items" . The bank may accept
the check but will hold it the normal
one or two days until it clears before
forwarding the deposit. If the date of
the FRB receipt (the date the check
was presented) differs from the
cancellation date (on the back of the
check) do not change the TC 650 to the
earlier date. The taxpayer had use of
the funds until the date the check
cleared.
-
Payments will also post as TC 670 if
the taxpayer attempts to make the
deposit directly to a service center
or a district office. This is an
example of a payment which is avoiding
the federal tax deposit system. Do not
change the transaction code, but
instruct the taxpayer in the proper
way to make deposits.
20.1.4.15
(07-15-1998)
Taxpayer Contact Correspondence
- IRM
1(15)29, Correspondence Handbook is the
central authority on guidelines for
handling taxpayer correspondence. A copy
of this IRM should be available to all
employees.
- The IDRS
Correspondex Letter System provides
several letters and notices that Service
Center employees may use to respond to
taxpayers regarding FTD penalty issues.
They include Letters 1206(C), 1446(C),
and Notice CP 568.
-
Beginning July 1995, the CP 568 replaced
Letters 2782(c), 1447(c) or Quick Note
to the taxpayer. The CP 568 has removed
the limitations that the old FTD PINEX
program had and provides:
- A
correspondex type notice where the
tax examiner can tailor a response
to suit the taxpayer’s needs.
- A
liability specific or a complete
return period calculation breakdown
of tax liabilities and FTD penalties
on request.
- A
complete summary of the taxpayer’s
account in an easy to read format.
- A
one day turn-around for getting
these notices back from printing.
-
Return of the letter to the
initiating unit with
A Requestor
Action Sheet listing the
liabilities and credits and text
selections used by the tax examiner
to prepare the letter.
- An FTDPN
print may be sent as a Correspondex
Letter attachment if the taxpayer has
requested an explanation of an FTD
penalty in addition to other
information.
20.1.4.15.1 (09-10-1999)
Telephone Contact
-
Whenever possible, resolve issues by
telephone contact with the taxpayer or
authorized representative.
-
Verify that the person to whom you
are speaking is authorized to
discuss the return and tax period
involved. Check Centralized
Authorization File (CAF).
-
Document the case history sheet
with the date and time of
conversation and the name of the
person contacted.
-
For more specific information and
restrictions on the use of oral
testimony, see LEM 20.1.1.3.
20.1.4.16
(09-10-1999)
FTD Penalty Relief
- Penalty
relief determinations
must be made on a case by
case basis.
- The
Service will not impose, or will abate a
FTD penalty when the taxpayer
establishes that due to specific penalty
relief provisions, the penalty should
not be imposed.
-
Before assessment, recommend
non-assertion of the penalty for
deposit amounts when taxpayers
provide documentation supporting
their position. Reference the
appropriate penalty reason code on
the closing documentation.
-
After assessment, abate the portion
of the penalty related to the
deposit for which the taxpayer has
provided documentation supporting
their position. Reference the
appropriate penalty reason code on
the adjustment document.
- A
taxpayer’s statement, regarding the
penalty relief criteria, must be about
the specific payment or deposit on which
the Service proposes or computes a
penalty. If the dates or explanations do
not correspond with the penalized
deposit, the taxpayer has not
established a valid reason to waive the
penalty.
- Contact
personnel should address the reason for
the failure to deposit timely when
securing or examining returns on which
the penalty applies. Making this initial
determination will prevent the need for
subsequent abatements.
- Requests
for non-assertion or abatement of FTD
penalties may require approval by the
manager.
- See LEM
20.1.1 for acceptance of oral testimony
relating to reasonable cause and LEM
20.1.4.3 for First Time Exception
Criteria.
20.1.4.16.1 (09-10-1999)
Reasonable Cause
- For
general reasonable cause guidelines
see IRM 20.1.1, Reasonable Cause and
Exhibit 20.1.1–3, Penalty
Abatement/Assertion Reason Code Chart.
- In the
interest of effective tax
administration and equity, the
non-assertion or abatement of civil
penalties based on reasonable cause
must be made in a consistent manner
and should conform to reasonable cause
considerations specified in the
Internal Revenue Code, Treasury
Regulations, Policy Statements (P–2–7
and P–1–18), and IRM 20.1.
20.1.4.16.2 (09-10-1999)
Administrative Waivers
- In
addition to those waivers identified
in IRM 20.1.1, the Service also
recognizes the impact of specific
operational changes which may justify
either not assessing or abating a
penalty for a limited length of time.
See Exhibit 20.1.4–19 for specific
penalty relief provisions.
-
Beginning January 1, 1995, some large
business taxpayers were
mandated
to make their FTD payments
electronically by using the Service’s
EFT/TAXLINK
System.
-
Due to difficulties encountered by
these taxpayers in complying with
the mandate, the Commissioner
granted a
ONE-TIME WAIVER of
penalties for mandated taxpayers
who failed to make electronic/EFT
(i.e., TAXLINK system) deposits.
-
This
one-time waiver for
mandated taxpayers was effective
from
01/01/1995 until 10/16/1995,
the date the FTD Penalty Revenue
Ruling was issued.
-
For the
one-time waiver,
accounts will be processed as
follows for the tax period
01/01/1995
through 10/16/ 1995:
Abate all FTD (previously referred
to as Avoidance) penalties on
mandated
taxpayers for failure to use the
TAXLINK/EFT system; Use Penalty
Reason Code
43 (Administrative
Waiver); DO
NOT use hold codes on
these adjustments; allow the
adjustment notices to be mailed.
-
After 10/16/1995, review
subsequent requests for abatement
of FTD penalties on a case-by-case
basis, using established
Reasonable Cause Criteria.
-
Penalties for late/insufficient
deposits may still apply.
-
Effective July 1, 1996, the Taxpayer
Bill of Rights 2 (TBOR2) provides that
the Secretary may waive the FTD
penalties with respect to an
inadvertent failure to deposit any
employment tax if
-
the depositing entity meets the
net worth requirements applicable
for the award of attorney’s fees;
Note:
For Individual — net worth does
not exceed $2 million. For
Corporations or Partnerships —
net worth not exceeding $7
million
-
the failure to deposit occurs
during the first quarter that the
depositing entity was required to
deposit any employment tax; and
-
the return for the employment tax
was filed on or before the due
date.
- TBOR2
also provides that the Secretary may
abate any penalty for failure to make
deposits for the first time if the
taxpayer sends a deposit to the
Secretary instead of to the required
government depository. This provision
has been in practice within IRS for at
least ten (10) years.
- The
Commissioner stated that the IRS will
not impose any penalties on new
depositors for failure to begin making
deposits electronically through the
Electronic Federal Tax Payment System
(EFTPS) until after December 31, 1997.
(Section 1809. 6-Month Delay of
Electronic Fund Transfer Requirement,
HR 3448, Small Business Job Protection
Act of 1996). Original delay was for
July 1, 1997, extended to December 31,
1997 for those taxpayers mandated to
begin using EFTPS 1/1/1997 (7/1/1997).
Additional waivers have been granted
through 6/30/1999. These waivers do
not apply to the former TAXLINK
mandates (1995/1996) . See LEM
20.1.4–4 for detailed matrix.
- Notice
99–20, 1999–17 I.R.B. 16, dated April
26, 1999, waives the 10-percent
Section 6656 penalty from July 1,
1999, through December 31, 1999, for
any mandated taxpayer having $200,000
or less in aggregate federal
depository taxes during calendar year
1998. The penalty waiver applies to
any mandated taxpayer including those
first required to deposit by
electronic funds transfers (EFT) in
1995 and 1996. A timely deposit is
still otherwise required.
20.1.4.16.3 (09-10-1999)
FTD Cascading Penalty Relief
(Interim)
- Rev.
Proc. 90–58, effective for deposit
liability periods beginning after
March 31, 1991, provides that deposits
will be applied in date-made order
against deposit liabilities in
due-date order. (First-In First-Out)
However, if a depositor inadvertently
misses a deposit early in a return
period but makes all succeeding
deposits on a timely basis, the result
can be multiple failure-to-deposit
penalties.
- IRS
published Notice 98–14, which provided
an interim procedure that taxpayers
could use to request abatement of the
failure-to-deposit penalty imposed by
IRC Section 6656 when the manner in
which IRS applied deposits produced
multiple failure-to-deposit penalties
as a result of a single failure to
deposit. This interim relief was
effective for return periods beginning
after December 31, 1997.
- The
penalty notice asks the taxpayer to
call the service center if they feel
that additional penalties have been
assessed as a result of a single
missed or late deposit.
-
Assistors will:
-
Identify which
single payment was
missed or late. (NOTE: If the
taxpayer has more than one missed
or late deposit, this penalty
relief measure does not apply.)
-
Calculate the correct timely due
date.
-
Bring up FTDPN - credit screen
-
Change payment date to a timely
date.
- If
the FTD computation is $.00 after
the late or missing deposit is
inserted, then it is a cascading
penalty.
-
For monthly depositors, the
deposit will almost always be 16
days late. Assess a straight 10%
FTD penalty for that single
deposit. If the taxpayer is a
semiweekly depositor, the FTD
penalty may be 2%, 5% or 10%, as
appropriate.
-
Reduce the penalty amount, using
PRC 66.
20.1.4.16.4 (09-10-1999)
Statutory Penalty Relief (RRA98)
-
Failure-to-deposit penalty provisions
of IRC 6656, as amended by Act Section
3304(a) of the IRS Restructuring and
Reform Act of 1998 (RRA98), Public law
No. 105–206, 112 Stat. 742 (1998),
provided that a taxpayer may designate
the application of its federal tax
deposits for a particular return
period in order to minimize the
failure-to-deposit penalty under IRC
Section 6656 with respect to deposits
required to be made after
January 18, 1999.
Revenue Procedure 99–10 was issued to
address this section of RRA ‘98.
Exhibit 20.1.4–20 contains a copy of
Rev. Proc. 99–10 along with examples
of using the redesignated deposit
rules (see Section 5).
-
This procedure applies with
respect to all taxes required to
be deposited after January 18,
1999 that are reported on Forms
720, 940, 941, 943, 945, CT–1 and
1042.
-
This permits a taxpayer receiving
a penalty notice (with respect to
any deposit of tax made for a
specific tax period) to designate
during the 90-day period beginning
on the date of a penalty notice,
the deposit period or periods to
which a deposit of tax shall
apply.
-
The procedure is the same as
4.16.3 with the exception that the
taxpayer may designate more than
one deposit. If the taxpayer has
multiple designations, they may
already have used a computer
program to work it out. If so, you
may want to obtain a copy to
assist in the recomputation.
-
Reduce the penalty amount, using
PRC 44.
- RRA98
Section 3304 (b) . Effective for
deposits required to be made after
January 18, 1999.
-
The first deposit a taxpayer is
required to make after changing
the frequency of payroll deposits
(e.g., monthly to semi-weekly;
semi-weekly to next day deposit)
and a penalty is assessed; the
taxpayer is entitled to an
abatement on the first deposit
ONLY.
-
The assistors need to research the
account for a change in deposit
patterns and question the taxpayer
to confirm that the change in
frequency of deposits caused the
problem.
-
PRC 44 is used for the penalty
reduction/abatement.
20.1.4.17
(09-10-1999)
Penalty Appeals
- Refer to
IRM 20.1.1 for procedures to follow when
a taxpayer appeals a penalty assessment.
- Managers
may review employee penalty
determinations and are considered the
first line of appeal, whenever an appeal
is requested by a taxpayer.
- Refer to
IRM 20.1.1 for duties required of
employees holding the Service Center
Penalty Appeals Coordinator position.
20.1.5.1
(08-20-1998)
Background
- This
section covers the accuracy-related
penalties under IRC section 6662 and the
fraud penalty under IRC section 6663.
Penalties applicable to returns due
before January 1, 1990, were removed
from this chapter.
- The
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1989 (OBRA 89) consolidated and
renumbered the following penalty code
sections:
-
Negligence or disregard of the rules
or regulations: from IRC section
6653(a) to 6662(b)(1) and 6662(c).
-
Substantial understatement of income
tax: from IRC section 6661 to
6662(b)(2) and 6662(d).
-
Substantial valuation misstatement:
from IRC section 6659 to 6662(b)(3)
and 6662(e).
-
Substantial overstatement of pension
liability: from IRC section 6659A to
6662(b)(4) and 6662(f).
-
Substantial estate or gift tax
valuation understatement: from IRC
section 6660 to 6662(b)(5) and
6662(g).
- The
accuracy-related penalty rate is 20
percent of the underpayment attributable
to any adjustments on the above.
- The
penalty increases to 40 percent for
above items (2)(c), (d) and (e) when
there is a gross valuation misstatement
as defined in IRC section 6662(h). (See
IRM 20.1.5.9.4.)
- OBRA 89
changed the civil fraud penalty from IRC
section 6653(b) to 6663. The penalty
rate is 75 percent of the underpayment
attributable to fraud.
- OBRA 89
added IRC section 6664 to provide
definitions and special rules that apply
to both the accuracy-related penalties
and the civil fraud penalty.
20.1.5.2
(08-20-1998)
Common Features: Accuracy-Related and
Civil Fraud Penalties
- All
accuracy-related and civil fraud
penalties are associated with the
examination of a tax return. See Treas.
Reg. 1.6662–2(a). Penalty review,
abatement, and reconsideration follow
guidelines established for the
examination of the return.
- Special
abatement procedures for TE/GE apply for
those accuracy-related penalties
assessed on NMF. These penalties relate
to:
- Form
4720, Return of Certain Excise Taxes
on Charities and Other Persons,
under Chapters 41 and 24 of the
Code, and
- Form
5330, Return of Initial Excise Taxes
Related to Employee Benefit Plans.
- Claims
for refund on assessed accuracy and
civil fraud penalties are handled like
other claims.
-
Return Filing Requirement:The
accuracy-related penalty and the civil
fraud penalty apply when a return has
been filed, either timely or late. The
accuracy-related penalties under IRC
section 6662 and the civil fraud penalty
under IRC section 6663 cannot be
asserted on a substitute-for-return
filed under IRC section 6020(b). See IRC
section 6664(b).
-
Uniform Definition of Underpayment:IRC
section 6664(a) provides a common
definition of underpayment. The
accuracy-related and civil fraud
penalties are calculated only on the
underpayment (or portion of the
underpayment) of tax attributable to the
misconduct or fraud, as applicable. See
IRC sections 6662(a) and 6663(a).
-
Coordination of Accuracy-Related and
Civil Fraud Penalties:The
accuracy-related and civil fraud
penalties cannot be asserted on the same
portion of the same underpayment.
However, the accuracy-related penalty
and the civil fraud penalty may be
asserted on the same return when civil
fraud applies to one portion of the
underpayment and the accuracy-related
penalty applies to another portion of
the underpayment. See IRC section
6662(b).
-
Interest:Under
IRC section 6601(e)(2)(B) interest on
civil fraud and accuracy-related
penalties accrues from the due date of
the return, including extensions.
-
Deficiency Procedures Apply:Both
penalties follow the guidelines for
30-day letters and statutory notices of
deficiency.
20.1.5.2.1 (08-20-1998)
Allocation
- An
allocation is only necessary when both
the accuracy-related and the civil
fraud penalty apply. When there are
three return adjustments, for example,
and one penalty applies to just one of
the three, the underpayment is derived
as follows:
-
Calculate the underpayment for all
adjustments.
-
Calculate the underpayment using
only the two adjustments for which
there is no penalty.
-
Subtract "2" from "1" .
-
Apply the penalty rate times the
amount derived in "3" above. This
is the amount of the penalty.
- In
allocating the portions of an
underpayment for penalty assertion
under IRC sections 6662 and 6663,
follow the ordering rules of Treas.
Reg. 1.6664–3:
-
Those for which no penalties have
been asserted.
-
Those for which a penalty has been
asserted at a 20 percent rate
under IRC sections 6662(b)(1),
(2), and (3).
-
Those for which a penalty has been
asserted at a 40 percent rate
under IRC section 6662(h) for
penalties defined in IRC section
6662(b)(3), (4), and (5).
-
Those for which a penalty has been
asserted at a 75 percent rate
under IRC section 6663.
- See
Exhibit 20.1.5–1 for an example
calculation of the underpayment on a
return with three adjustments—the
first with no penalty, the second with
the accuracy-related penalty
attributable to a substantial
understatement, and the third with the
civil fraud penalty.
- Only
one penalty rate applies to any
portion of an underpayment. When two
penalties could apply, the penalty at
the higher rate is asserted. If two
penalties at the same rate would
apply, assert the penalty that is more
comprehensively applicable and, in
unagreed cases, include the other
penalty in the report as an
alternative position. The following
illustrates the "no stacking"
provision in Treas. Reg. 1.6662–2(c):
- If
a portion of the underpayment of
tax required to be shown on a
return is attributable to both
negligence and substantial
understatement, the
accuracy-related penalty would
only apply once at the 20 percent
rate to this portion of the
underpayment. The examining agent
should assert the penalty that is
most strongly supported by the
facts and circumstances and write
up the other as an alternative
position.
-
The penalty is applied at the 40
percent rate on any portion of the
underpayment attributable to a
gross valuation misstatement. Any
penalty at the 20 percent rate
that could have applied to this
portion is not asserted except as
an alternative.
- A
penalty is applied at the 75
percent rate on any portion of the
underpayment attributable to civil
fraud. Any penalty that could have
applied to this portion at the 20
or 40 percent rate is not
asserted.
- Any
income tax withholding, estimated
payments, or other payment made before
a return was filed, that was not
claimed on the return or previously
allowed as a credit against the tax
liability for the taxable year is
allocated as follows:
- If
the unclaimed prepayment credits
allocable to a particular
adjustment, e.g., withholding on
unreported W–2 income, the credit
is used to reduce the amount of
the underpayment resulting from
such adjustment. (See Treas. Reg.
1.6664–3(c)(1).)
- If
the unclaimed prepayment credit is
not allocable to a particular
adjustment, the credit is applied
in accordance with the ordering
rules set forth in Treas. Reg.
1.6664–3(c). (See Treas. Reg.
1.6664–3(d) for examples
illustrating the manner in which
unclaimed prepayment credits are
to be allocated.)
20.1.5.2.2 (08-20-1998)
Carrybacks and Carryovers
- The
amount of an underpayment subject to
IRC sections 6662 or 6663 will not be
reduced by any carryback or carryover
of a net operating loss (NOL),
deduction, or credit. See Treas. Reg.
1.6662–3(d), 1.6662–4(c) and
1.6664–2(f).
-
Example:
- A
1991 examination adjustment
results in an underpayment of
$3,000, which is subject to the
accuracy-related penalty
attributable to negligence.
- A
$12,000 NOL carryback from 1992 to
1991 offsets the $3,000
underpayment for income tax
purposes, but the $3,000
underpayment is still used in the
calculation of the
accuracy-related penalty for 1991:
20% × $3,000 = $600.
- The
accuracy-related penalty applies to an
underpayment for a year to which a
loss, deduction or credit has been
carried if the underpayment in the
loss or credit year is penalized.
-
Example:
-
The taxpayer filed a 1993 return
with an NOL of $45,000, twenty
thousand dollars of the $45,000
for 1993 is carried forward to
1994.
- An
examination of the 1993 return
results in an adjustment of
$60,000 due to the negligent
omission of income. The $45,000
NOL is disallowed in full and
there is an underpayment of $3,000
for 1993.
-
The $20,000 amount carried over
from 1993 to 1994 is disallowed.
This produces a 1994 underpayment
of $2,000. Because this is the
result of an adjustment for which
negligence applied in 1993, the
penalty also applies to the 1994
underpayment.
-
Note:If
the NOL disallowance for 1993 did
not result in an underpayment, but
did create an underpayment for
1994 (due to the disallowed
carryover from 1993), then the
penalty would apply to 1994.
- When
the penalty assertion requires a
dollar threshold, (e.g., $5,000 for
substantial understatements and
valuation misstatements) this
threshold must be met for each year in
which the penalty will be asserted
(including a carryback or carryover
year).
- For
special rules regarding carrybacks and
carryovers in the area of transfer
pricing, see Treas. Reg. 1.6662–6(e).
- IRC
sections 6662 and 6663 apply to
post-OBRA 89 returns due after
December 31, 1989, determined without
regard to extensions. Pre-OBRA 89
returns are those due before January
1, 1990 determined without regard to
extensions. Post-OBRA 89 penalty rates
are different from pre-OBRA 89 rates.
-
Example:
-
Penalty rates applicable to
carrybacks from a post-OBRA year
(e.g., 1991) to a pre-OBRA year
(e.g., 1988) will be calculated at
the post-OBRA 89 rates under IRC
section 6662 for both years. (See
Treas. Reg. 1.6662–3(d)(2).) Any
dollar thresholds required for
penalty assertion will also be
determined by IRC section 6662 for
both years.
-
The regulations are silent on
penalty rates applicable to
carryforwards from a pre-OBRA
return to a post-OBRA return.
Contact Area Counsel on this issue
before assertion.
-
The transfer pricing penalty under
IRC section 6662(e) applies to
taxable years ending after
November 5, 1990.
- In the
case of carrybacks and carryovers,
disclosure is only made with the
return for the taxable year in which
the carryback or carryover originates.
20.1.5.2.3 (08-20-1998)
Definitions
-
Coordinated Examination
Program:
Rev.
Proc. 94–69, 1994–2 C.B. 804, provides
special rules for CEP taxpayers to
meet the disclosure exception after
receipt of audit notification.
-
Corrected tax:
The
term corrected tax includes any
statutory adjustments based on AGI.
-
Example:
-
Medical, casualty loss, and
miscellaneous deductions,
-
Changes to the tax as a result of
the examination, or
-
Changes to any credit, prepayment
credit, or refundable credit as a
result of the examination. (This
includes any prepayment credits
that were paid for the year under
examination but were not
credited.)
-
Pass-through entities:
Generally, disclosure for items
attributable to a pass-through entity
should be made on Form 8275 or 8275–R,
as appropriate, attached to the return
(or qualified amended return) of the
entity. A taxpayer (i.e., partner,
shareholder, beneficiary or holder of
a residual interest in a REMIC) also
may make adequate disclosure by filing
Form 8275 or 8275–R in duplicate, one
copy attached to the taxpayer’s copy
of the return and one attached to the
return that is filed with the Service.
-
Qualified amended
return:
Treas. Reg. 1.6664–2(c)(3). The
taxpayer may make adequate disclosure
on a qualified amended return, i.e.,
an amended return filed after the
return is filed but before:
-
The receipt of an audit
notification letter,
-
The receipt of a timely request
for an administrative adjustment
under IRC section 6227, or
-
Contact concerning an activity
described in IRC section 6700.
-
Recurring items:
Disclosure with respect to a recurring
item, such as the basis of recovery
property, must be made with each
return on which the item is taken into
account.
-
Rebate:
A
rebate is the amount of an abatement
credit, refund or other repayment, as
was made on the basis that the tax
imposed was less than the excess of
the sum of:
-
The amount shown as a tax by the
taxpayer on the return, plus
-
Amounts not so shown previously
assessed, or
-
Collected without assessment, as a
deficiency over certain rebates
previously made.
-
NOTE: In calculating the amount of
the understatement, adjustments to
refundable credits or prepayment
credits for withholding or
estimated tax
are
not
included. See Treas. Reg.
1.6664–2(e) and 1.6662–4(b)(5).
-
Tax per return:
Tax
per the return includes:
-
Service center math error
corrections,
-
Changes made by a qualified
amended return posted to the
account as a creditor debit (see
Treas. Reg. 1.6664–2(c)(3) and IRM
20.1.5.2.3, and
-
Any amounts not shown on the
return but previously assessed or
collected without assessment
(e.g., in jeopardy assessments).
See Treas. Reg.
1.6664–2(a)(1)(ii).
-
Underpayment:
See
Treas. Reg. 1.6664–2. An underpayment
is defined as the amount by which any
income tax imposed, exceeds the excess
of:
-
The sum of the amount shown on the
return, plus
-
Amounts not so shown that were
previously assessed (or collected
without assessment), over
-
The amount of rebates made.
-
Note: In calculating the amount of
the underpayment, adjustments to
refundable credits or prepayment
credits for withholding or
estimated tax
are
included.
-
Understatement:
The
amount of the understatement
determines if the condition is met to
assert the penalty. An understatement
is the excess of the amount of:
-
The tax required to be shown on
the return, over
-
The amount of tax imposed which is
shown on the return, reduced by
any rebate. See Treas. Reg.
1.6662–4(b)(2).
20.1.5.3
(08-20-1998)
Examination Penalty Assertion
- The
examiner is responsible for the
assertion of the accuracy-related
penalty. The term "examiner" includes
revenue agents, auditors, examiners, and
officers who are auditing income tax
returns, employment tax returns,
employee plans, exempt organizations and
related tax returns.
- Penalty
considerations are to be addressed in
all examinations and workpapers should
be prepared under the following
guidelines:
- For
examination adjustments that clearly
do not involve penalties, a brief
comment to that effect is
sufficient.
- When
adjustments would appear to warrant
the penalty, but it is not asserted,
the applicable exceptions to the
penalty will be elaborated in the
workpapers.
- On
agreed examinations, the assertion
of the penalty is documented in the
workpapers and fully explained in
the report.
- When
the penalty is asserted on unagreed
cases, the Service position must be
fully developed and documented,
including the applicability of any
exceptions.
-
Note: The
above guidelines do not apply to
returns examined under the
Coordinated Examination Program.
- Form
3198, Special Handling Notice, is
attached to all cases when the
accuracy-related penalty is asserted.
-
Examiners will identify the adjustments
related to each penalty in the report,
and identify each one separately by Code
section and amount.
- In
proposing the penalty to the taxpayer or
taxpayer’s representative, the examiner
will:
-
Elaborate all the reasons why the
penalty assertion appears
appropriate, and
-
Consider and document any possible
exceptions to the penalty provided
by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s
representative whether or not they
are accepted.
- When
more than one component of the
accuracy-related penalty may apply to
the same portion of an underpayment
(e.g., negligence and substantial
understatement):
- On
agreed cases: the Service will
assert the penalty with the
strongest position.
- On
unagreed cases: the Service will
assert the penalty with the
strongest position, but also will
calculate and explain any
alternative position(s) on Form
886–A, Explanation of Items,
attached to the report. Alternative
positions will also be included in
the statutory notice of deficiency.
20.1.5.4
(08-20-1998)
Underreporter Penalty Assertion
- The
accuracy-related penalty is CP–2501,
initial query letter. The examining
officer will make a penalty
determination based on the taxpayer’s
response. In the absence of a response,
the determination will be made on the
basis of return information and the
significance of the amounts omitted.
- Notices
and reports will fully identify the Code
sections and the amounts for penalties
asserted.
- All
penalty determinations involving a
reasonable cause exception will be
documented in the workpapers. This will
be done by identification on the
Underreporter case analysis screen and
will remain with the case file.
- In
unagreed cases, the Service will provide
the taxpayer or representative with a
complete explanation of the penalty.
20.1.5.5
(08-20-1998)
Penalty Assessment
- The
examiner will compute the penalty for
the processing function (e.g. Case
Processing Support, CSU, or TE/GE–SP).
Form 3198, Special Handling Notice, will
be used to indicate the penalty
assertion.
- Input
the accuracy-related penalty using
Reference Number 680 for the following:
-
6662(e), Substantial Valuation
Misstatement,
-
6662(f), Substantial Overstatement
of Pension Liabilities, and
-
6662(h), Gross Valuation
Misstatement.
- Input
the accuracy-related penalty with
Reference Number 680. Master File will
compute interest on this penalty from
the due date or extended due date of the
return (whichever is later) to the
earlier of:
- The
date of payment,
-
Waiver date plus 30 days, or
- 23C
date of assessment.
20.1.5.6
(08-20-1998)
Penalty Relief
- General
penalty relief is discussed in IRM
20.1.1, Penalty Relief. Exceptions
specific to each of the accuracy-related
penalties and the civil fraud penalty
are discussed in their respective
chapters.
20.1.5.6.1 (08-20-1998)
Reasonable Cause
- No
accuracy-related penalty is imposed if
it is shown that the taxpayer had
reasonable cause and that the taxpayer
acted in good faith for the position
taken. The reasonable cause provision
in IRC section 6664(c) applies to all
of the accuracy-related components.
- IRM
20.1.1. and Treas. Reg. 1.6664–4
contain additional information and
examples. The reasonable cause
exception will be determined on a
case-by-case basis taking into account
all the pertinent facts and
circumstances. Generally, the most
important factor is the taxpayer’s
effort to assess the proper tax
liability. The credibility of the
taxpayer’s reasons for not determining
the proper tax liability should be
evaluated.
- Treas.
Reg. 1.6664–4T(f) provides guidelines
for applying the reasonable cause and
good faith exception to IRC section
6662(e) penalties for transactions
between persons described in IRC
section 482 and net IRC section 482
transfer pricing adjustments. For
specific reasonable cause criteria on
transfer pricing adjustments, see IRM
20.1.5.9.7.1.
20.1.5.6.2 (08-20-1998)
Reliance on Advice
-
Reliance on advice as defined by
Treas. Reg. 1.6664–4(c) may satisfy
the reasonable cause exception of IRC
section 6664(c):
-
"Advice" is defined as any
communication, including the opinion
of a professional tax advisor, setting
forth an analysis or conclusion by a
person other than the taxpayer and on
which the taxpayer relied in preparing
the return. Advice does not have to be
in any particular form.
- Under
Treas. Reg. 1.6664–4(c)(1), taxpayers
may meet the reasonable cause
exception if they reasonably relied on
advice that was based upon:
-
Reasonable factual or legal
assumptions,
-
All pertinent facts and
circumstances, and
-
The law as it relates to the facts
and circumstances.
- Having
met the above requirements, the
exception will still not apply unless,
with respect to all the pertinent
facts and circumstances, there was
reasonable reliance on the advice in
good faith.
-
Whenever the taxpayer has met the
advice standard as an exception to the
penalty, the preparer’s conduct
becomes an issue. The preparer should
be contacted to determine the
applicability of IRC section 6694.
- Treas.
Reg. 1.6664–4T(f) provides guidelines
for applying the reasonable cause and
good faith exception to IRC section
6662(e) penalties for transactions
between persons described in IRC
section 482 and net IRC section 482
transfer pricing adjustments. For
specific reasonable cause criteria
relating transfer pricing adjustments,
see IRM 20.1.5.9.7.1.
20.1.5.7
(08-20-1998)
IRC section 6662(b)(1): Negligence or
Disregard of Rules and Regulations
- OBRA 89
redesignated the negligence penalty from
IRC section 6653(a) to 6662(b)(1). IRC
section 6662(b)(1) applies to returns
due after December 31, 1989 (without
regard to extensions).
- The
amount of the penalty is 20 percent of
the underpayment attributable to
negligence or disregard of rules or
regulations.
20.1.5.7.1 (08-20-1998)
Negligence Penalty Assertion
-
Negligence includes any failure to
make a reasonable attempt to comply
with the provisions of the tax law,
exercise ordinary and reasonable care
in tax return preparation, or keep
adequate books and records. (See
Treas. Reg. 1.6662–3(b).)
- The
regulations also provide that
negligence is strongly indicated when
a taxpayer fails to report income
shown on an information return, fails
to make a reasonable inquiry into the
correctness of a deduction, credit, or
exclusion on a tax return that seems
"too good to be true," or when the
returns of partners or S corporation
shareholders are clearly inconsistent
with the tax returns of their
respective entities.
- Some
indications of negligence follow:
-
Unreported or understated income,
-
Deductions or credits
significantly overstated,
-
Careless, improper, or exaggerated
deductions,
-
Misrepresenting or miscategorizing
deductions in such a manner as to
conceal the true nature of the
deduction,
-
Unexplainable items,
-
Inadequate books and records,
-
Cooperative state programs and
state reports showing a negligence
penalty (taking into account other
factors and not relying entirely
on the findings of another taxing
agency),
-
Substantial errors on an issue
that had been adjusted in a prior
year,
-
Giving the preparer incorrect or
incomplete information to prepare
the returns.
20.1.5.7.2 (08-20-1998)
Disregard of Rules and Regulations
-
Disregard of rules or regulations
related to the taxpayer’s failure to
follow the appropriate law in
completing the return, and reflects a
disregard of the Code, temporary or
final regulations, notices, or revenue
rulings (other than notices of
proposed rule making). The term
"disregard" includes careless,
reckless, or intentional disregard.
-
Disregard is "careless" if the
taxpayer does not exercise
reasonable care to determine the
correctness of a tax return.
-
Disregard is "reckless" if the
taxpayer makes little or no effort
to determine if a rule or
regulation exists, under
circumstances demonstrating a
substantial deviation from a
reasonable standard of conduct.
-
Disregard is "intentional" if the
taxpayer knows of a rule or
regulation and ignores that rule
or regulation.
- A
taxpayer who takes a position contrary
to a revenue ruling or notice has not
disregarded the ruling or notice if
the position has a realistic
possibility of being sustained on its
merits.
20.1.5.7.3 (08-20-1998)
Coordination with Civil Fraud
Penalty
- For
the assertion of the civil fraud
penalty and how it relates to the
assertion of the accuracy-related
penalty attributable to negligence or
intentional disregard of the rules or
regulations see IRM 20.1.5.2.
20.1.5.7.4 (08-20-1998)
Substitute-for-
Return, Delinquent Returns, and "No
Show" Cases
- The
accuracy-related and civil fraud
penalties can only be applied to a
return that has been filed by the
taxpayer. See IRC section 6664(b).
- The
accuracy-related and civil fraud
penalties cannot be applied to a
substitute-for-return under IRC
section 6020(b). However, these
penalties can be asserted on a secured
delinquent return, i.e., a return
obtained after the taxpayer has been
contacted by the IRS. Examiners cannot
apply the accuracy-related penalties
to a delinquent return after an
assessment (TC 290/300) is made under
substitute-for-return
procedures.
- The
accuracy-related penalty attributable
to negligence will not be asserted
solely for filing a return late.
- The
accuracy-related penalty attributable
to negligence will not be asserted
solely due to the taxpayer’s failure
to appear for an audit or respond to
an inquiry or notice. However, the
facts and circumstances from the
return and the case file may warrant
assertion of the accuracy-related
penalty attributable to negligence.
-
Example:
- An
IRP document shows the taxpayer
received $5,000 of interest
income. The tax return reflects
AGI of $40,000 but no interest
income. The taxpayer does not
appear for the examination. The
accuracy-related penalty
attributable to negligence should
be asserted based on the
information on the return and in
the case file.
-
The 1991 and 1992 examinations
disallowed the auto expense
deduction because the costs were
commuting expenses. The 1993
return was filed and secured after
these examinations and the
taxpayer claimed the same
deduction for commuting expenses.
The taxpayer did not appear for
the office appointment. Based on
the prior year’s disallowed
deduction, and the taxpayer’s
knowledge of the nondeductible
expense, the accuracy-related
penalty attributable to negligence
would be asserted on the 1993
return.
20.1.5.7.5 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Assessment
- The
examining officer will compute the
accuracy-related penalty attributable
to negligence for the processing
function (Case Processing Support,
CSU, or TE/GE–SP). Form 3198, Special
Handling Notice, will be used to
indicate the penalty assertion.
- TC 350
will be used to enter the total
penalty on Form 5403 or Form 5344,
Examination Closing Record. Forms 5599
or 5650 are used for TE/GE cases.
20.1.5.7.6 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Relief
-
Reasonable Cause.
The penalty does not apply if the
taxpayer has reasonable cause and
acted in good faith, i.e., if an error
was due to an honest misunderstanding
of the facts or the law and the
taxpayer took reasonable steps to
comply with the law. (See IRM 20.1.1)
-
Adequate Disclosure.
Disclosure is adequate if:
- It
is made with the return, or on a
qualified amended return, and
-
Unless otherwise prescribed by the
Commissioner, a completed Form
8275, Disclosure Statement, is
filed with the original return or
qualified amended return. Form
8275–R, Regulations Disclosure
Statement, is necessary for
disclosing a position contrary to
a regulation.
-
Treas. Regs. 1.6662–3(c),
1.6662–4(e) and (f) define
adequate methods of disclosure for
returns due after December 31,
1991, the effective date of the
regulations.
-
See IRM 20.1.5.3 for the
definition of a qualified amended
return.
-
When disclosure is not adequate.
The exception for adequate disclosure
will not apply if:
-
The item on the return is
attributable to a tax shelter,
-
The taxpayer has not kept adequate
books and records, or fails to
substantiate items on the return,
-
For returns due (without regard to
extension) before January 1, 1994,
the item or position on the return
is frivolous (i.e., patently
improper), or
-
For returns due (without regard to
extension) after December 31,
1993, the item or position on the
return does not have a reasonable
basis. (Applies to disregard of
rules and regulations only.)
-
See IRM 20.1.5.6.
-
Adequate Disclosure Determination.
The applicability of the disclosure
exception is determined for each item
or group of similar items separately.
When the adequate disclosure exception
is met (except in the case of a tax
shelter), the tax attributable to the
disclosed item is not included in the
calculation of the underpayment for
penalty purposes. (For disclosure with
respect to recurring items (e.g.,
basis in recovery property),
carrybacks and carryovers,
pass-through entities, and CEP
examinations see IRM 20.1.5.2.)
-
Negligence and Adequate Disclosure:
-
For returns due after December 31,
1989 and before January 1, 1994
the adequate disclosure exception
does not apply if the item is
frivolous. See Notice 90–20,
1990–1 C.B. 328.
-
For returns due after December 31,
1993, adequate disclosure does not
apply. Whenever the taxpayer has a
reasonable basis for an item or
position taken, negligence by
definition does not apply. See IRM
20.1.5.8.4.
-
Disregard of Rules or Regulations and
Adequate Disclosure:
-
Adequate disclosure is an
exception to the penalty
attributable to disregard of rules
or regulations. Since the penalty
attributable to negligence (for
returns due after December 31,
1993) is not subject to a
disclosure exception, the
distinction between negligence and
disregard of rules and regulations
will sometimes have to be made.
-
The penalties attributable to
negligence and disregard of rules
or regulations often overlap, seem
to apply equally to any given
case, and are often difficult to
distinguish. (See Treas. Reg.
1.6662–3(b)(1) and (2) for the
definitions of negligence and
disregard.)
-
For returns due after December 31,
1991 (without regard to
extensions) and before January 1,
1994, the disclosure exception is
met for disregard of rules or
regulations only when the required
form is filed by the taxpayer
(Form 8275 or 8275–R), and the
item or position on the return has
a realistic possibility of being
sustained on its merits. See IRM
20.1.5.8.
-
For returns due after December 31,
1993 (without regard to
extensions), the disclosure
exception is available if the
position taken on the return has a
reasonable basis.
-
The penalty for disregard usually
applies if an item on the return
is contrary to the Internal
Revenue Code, temporary or final
regulations issued under the
Internal Revenue Code, or a
revenue ruling or notice (other
than notices of proposed rule
making) published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin. However, the
penalty does not apply to a
position contrary to a revenue
ruling or notice if the item has a
realistic possibility of being
sustained on its merits.
20.1.5.8
(08-20-1998)
IRC Section 6662(d): Substantial
Understatement
- OBRA 89
repealed IRC section 6661, Substantial
Understatement of Liability, and
replaced it with the accuracy-related
penalties in IRC section 6662(d).
- The
penalty is 20 percent of the
underpayment of income tax when there is
a substantial understatement of income
tax. An understatement is substantial
when it exceeds the greater of 10
percent of the tax required to be shown
on the return for a taxable year, or
$5,000 ($10,000 for C-corporations).
20.1.5.8.1 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Assertion
- The
penalty can only be asserted when the
understatement is substantial, i.e.,
when it exceeds the greater of 10
percent of the tax required to be
shown on the return, or $5,000
($10,000 for C corporations).
- When
the understatement is substantial but
the penalty is not asserted, the
examiner should explain the applicable
exceptions in the case file.
-
Preparer penalties under IRC section
6694 must be considered and documented
for all substantial understatement
penalty cases.
-
Whenever the penalty is not asserted
because the taxpayer has met the
"advice" standard under the reasonable
cause exception, contact with the
preparer is mandatory before the case
is closed from the group. Disclosure
guidelines are not jepoardized in this
context.
-
Examiners will identify the penalty
attributable to each adjustment in the
report, and explain each penalty by
Code section and amount.
- When
the accuracy-related penalty
attributable to a substantial
understatement of income tax is not
asserted due to the assertion of
negligence or disregard of the rules
or regulations, any unagreed report
will include the substantial
understatement as an alternative
position.
- The
penalty cannot be asserted on a
substitute-for-return under IRC
section 6020(b). A return must have
been filed (timely or delinquent) for
the examiner to assert the penalty.
- The
penalty can be asserted on "no show"
cases when:
-
The understatement is substantial,
-
The return on its face is patently
suspect, and
-
The taxpayer would not appear to
meet any exceptions.
20.1.5.8.2 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Calculation
- For
the definition, allocation and
calculation of the underpayment see
IRM 20.1.5.2.3.
- To
determine the correct penalty:
-
Calculate the understatement.
-
Establish that the understatement
exceeds the greater of $5,000
($10,000 for C corporations) or 10
percent of the tax required to be
shown on the return.
-
Consider exceptions to the
penalty.
- If
any exceptions apply, recalculate
the understatement without
including the tax on the
adjustments not subject to the
penalty. Determine if the
requirements are still met for
penalty assertion.
-
Consider adjustments to prepayment
and refundable credits and
establish the underpayment.
-
Apply the penalty rate to the
underpayment.
- For
example calculations see Exhibits
20.1.5–2 and 20.1.5–3.
20.1.5.8.3 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Assessment
- To
assess or abate penalties imposed
under this code section, complete code
and edit Forms 5344, 5403, 5599 or
5650 in the normal manner with the
following exceptions:
- Do
not enter either Transaction Codes
(TC) 240/241 or the penalty
amount;
-
Enter the reference number and the
penalty amount (TC 240/241 will
automatically be generated to the
Master File).
- When a
manual computation of interest on the
penalty is required, see established
procedures.
20.1.5.8.4 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Relief
- Before
asserting the substantial
understatement penalty, exceptions to
the penalty must be considered.
20.1.5.8.4.1 (08-20-1998)
Substantial Authority Exception
- The
penalty under IRC section 6662(d)
will not be asserted if there is
substantial authority for the tax
treatment of an item or return
position. When the taxpayer’s
authority for the item or return
position is substantial with respect
to the authority against it, the
penalty will not be asserted.
Authorities relevant to both sides
of the tax treatment of an item are
taken into account.
-
Substantial authority is an
objective standard involving an
analysis and application of the law
to the relevant facts. It is not
determined with reference to what
the taxpayer actually believed to be
the correct treatment of the item.
Every item must be separately
evaluated to determine whether there
is substantial authority for the tax
treatment of an item.
-
The substantial authority
standard is less rigid than the
"more likely than not" standard.
The "more likely than not"
standard is met when there is
more than a 50 percent
likelihood that the position
would be sustained.
-
The substantial authority
standard is more rigid than the
reasonable basis standard. The
reasonable basis standard has
not been defined by regulation,
but per the committee reports
associated with section 13251 of
the Uruguay Round Agreement Act,
P.L. 103–465 dated December 8,
1994, is the same standard that
precludes the assertion of the
penalty for negligence and
disregard of rules and
regulations. A position having a
reasonable basis is a position
that is arguable but fairly
unlikely to prevail in court.
-
Therefore, the substantial
authority exception can be met
when the taxpayer has less than
a 50 percent, but more than a
one-in-three likelihood of being
sustained on the issue.
-
"Authority" under Treas. Reg.
1.6662–4(d)(3)(iii) is established
by reference to:
-
The Internal Revenue Code and
other statutory provisions;
-
Proposed, temporary and final
regulations;
-
Revenue rulings and revenue
procedures;
-
Tax treaties, the regulations
thereunder, and Treasury
Department and other official
explanations of such treaties;
-
Court cases;
-
Congressional intent as
reflected in committee reports,
joint explanatory statements of
managers included in conference
committee reports, and floor
statement made prior to
enactment by one of a bill’s
managers;
-
General Explanations of tax
legislation prepared by the
Joint Committee on Taxation (the
"Blue Book" );
-
Private letter rulings and
technical advice memoranda
issued after October 31, 1976;
-
Actions on decisions and general
counsel memoranda issued after
March 12, 1981 (as well as
general counsel memoranda
published in pre-1955 volumes of
the Cumulative Bulletin);
-
IRS information releases and
press releases;
-
Notices, announcements and other
administrative pronouncements
published by the Service in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin.
-
Taxpayers automatically meet the
substantial authority standard if:
-
They have been named in a
technical advice memorandum,
-
Have been issued an area
director’s determination letter,
-
Have been issued a private
letter ruling, or
-
Received a revenue agent’s
report for a prior taxable year
with an affirmative statement on
the same item.
-
Taxpayers do not automatically meet
the substantial authority standard
if a private letter ruling is
revoked or is inconsistent with:
-
Subsequent proposed regulations
-
Subsequent revenue rulings, or
-
Other administrative
pronouncements published in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin.
-
See Treas. Reg.
1.6662–4(d)(3)(ii).
- The
term "authority" does not include
treatises, legal periodicals, legal
opinions or opinions rendered by
other tax professionals.
- An
authority does not continue to be an
authority if it is overruled or
modified, implicitly or explicitly,
by a body having the power to
overrule or modify an earlier
authority such as a U.S. Court of
Appeals overruling a district court
which originally issued the
authority used by the taxpayer.
- A
Tax Court opinion is not considered
to be overruled or modified by a
court of appeals to which a taxpayer
does not have a right of appeal,
unless the Tax Court adopts the
holding of the court of appeals.
-
Substantial authority is determined
as of the date of filing or the last
day of the taxable year. (See Treas.
Reg. 1.6662–4(d)(3)(iv)(C).)
- For
determining the weight of various
"authorities" see Treas. Regs.
1.6662–4(d)(3)(ii).
20.1.5.8.4.2 (08-20-1998)
Adequate Disclosure Exception
- When
the adequate disclosure exception is
met, the tax attributable to the
disclose item or return position is
not included in the calculation of
the understatement for penalty
purposes.
-
Generally, the accuracy-related
penalty attributable to substantial
understatement will not be asserted
on the underpayment attributable to
an item that is adequately
disclosed. However, even when the
item is adequately disclosed the
penalty will still be asserted if:
-
For returns due after January
31, 1991, but before January 1,
1994—the disclosed item is
frivolous, i.e., patently
improper (see former Treas.
Regs. 1.6662–3(b)(3)),
-
For returns due after December
31, 1993—the disclosed item does
not meet the reasonable basis
standard,
-
The taxpayer failed to keep
adequate books and records or
failed to substantiate the
disclosed item, or
-
The item is attributable to a
tax shelter as defined in IRC
section 6662(d)(2)(C)(iii) and
Treas. Reg. 1.6662–4(g)(2).
-
Disclosure is adequate if it is made
in a statement attached to a return,
i.e., Form 8275, Disclosure
Statement, or Form 8275–R,
Regulation Disclosure Statement.
-
Disclosure is considered
adequate for tax return line
item entries identified in and
disclosed according to the
annual revenue procedure that
applies for the year of the
return.
-
If the revenue procedure does
not expressly provide that
disclosure of an item on the
return is sufficient, disclosure
should be made on Form 8275.
- The
definition of adequate disclosure
provided by the following revenue
procedures only pertains to the
accuracy-related penalty
attributable to a substantial
understatement.
-
For 1990 returns, see Rev. Proc.
91–19, 1991–1 C.B. 523.
-
For 1991 returns see Rev. Proc.
92–23, 1992–1 C.B. 737.
-
For 1992 returns see Rev. Proc.
93–33, 1993–2 C.B. 470.
-
For 1993 returns see Rev. Proc.
94–36, 1994–1 C.B. 682.
-
For 1994 returns see Rev. Proc.
94–74, 1994–2 C.B. 823.
-
For 1995 returns see Rev. Proc.
95–55, 1995–52 I.R.B. 34.
-
For 1996 returns see Rev. Proc.
96–58, 1996–53 I.R.B. 16.
-
For CEP returns see Rev. Proc.
94–69, 1994–2 C.B. 804.
-
After 1996, it is necessary to
review the annual revenue
procedure published by the
Service for the applicable tax
year.
-
Courts have also held that a
disclosure statement is adequate if
it reasonably apprises the Service
of the nature and amount of the
potential controversy. This
statement should include the
following:
-
A caption identifying the
statement as a disclosure under
IRC section 6662,
-
An identification of the item
with respect to which the
disclosure is made,
-
The amount of the item, and
-
The facts affecting the tax
treatment of the item sufficient
to apprise the Service of the
nature of the potential
controversy.
-
Note: If
the disclosure statement fails
to include all of the above,
misrepresents the facts, or is
too general to reasonably
apprise the Service of the
potential controversy, the
disclosure exception does not
apply.
-
See
Schirmer v. Commissioner,
89 T.C. 277, 285–86 (1977);
Dibsy
v. Commissioner, T.C.
Memo. 1995–477.
-
Treas. Regs. 1.6662–3(c),
1.6662–4(e) and (f) define adequate
methods of disclosure. These
provisions are effective for returns
due after December 31, 1991, the
effective date of the regulations.
- For
returns due after December 31, 1989,
and before January 1, 1992, the
provision for qualifying disclosures
is found in Notice 90–20, 1990–1
C.B. 328, which allows the
disclosure to be made on the return
(in a special manner) or on Form
8275.
20.1.5.8.4.3 (08-20-1998)
Exceptions for Tax Shelter Items
- The
term "tax shelter" is defined in IRC
section 6662(d)(2)(C) and Treas.
Regs. 1.6662–4(g)(2) as an
arrangement, plan, or other entity
(such as a corporation, partnership
or trust), that has as its principal
purpose the avoidance or evasion of
federal income tax.
- The
term "tax shelter item" is defined
in Treas. Reg. 1.6662–4(g)(3) as an
item of income, gain, loss,
deduction, or credit that is
directly or indirectly attributable
to the principal purpose of a tax
shelter to avoid or evade federal
income tax.
20.1.5.8.4.3.1 (08-20-1998)
Non-Corporate Tax Shelter Items
-
The portion of an understatement
attributable to a tax shelter item
of a non-corporate taxpayer will
not be considered for assertion of
the penalty when:
-
There is substantial authority
for the treatment of the item,
and
-
The taxpayer reasonably
believed that the tax
treatment of the item was more
likely than not the proper
treatment. See IRC section
6662(d)(2)(C)(i)(i).
-
The reasonable belief standard is
met if:
-
The taxpayer analyzed
pertinent facts and relevant
authorities to conclude in
good faith that there would be
a greater than 50 percent
likelihood that the tax
treatment of the item would be
upheld if challenged by the
IRS; or
-
the taxpayer reasonably relied
in good faith on the opinion
of a professional tax advisor
who analyzed all the pertinent
facts and authorities, and who
unambiguously states that
there is a greater than 50
percent likelihood that the
tax treatment of the item will
be upheld if challenged by the
IRS.
-
Non-corporate pass-through
entities: If the entity satisfies
the reasonable belief requirement,
the taxpayer is deemed to have
also met the requirement.
-
The general exception for
reasonable cause and good faith in
IRC section 6664(c) will also be
considered, if, for example, there
is an honest misunderstanding of
fact or law that is reasonable in
light of all facts and
circumstances.
20.1.5.8.4.3.2 (08-20-1998)
Corporate Tax Shelter Items
-
For tax shelter items of corporate
taxpayers relating to transactions
occurring on or before December 8,
1994, the exceptions for
non-corporate taxpayers also
apply. See IRM 20.1.5.8.4.3.1.
- To
more effectively deter corporate
tax shelter transactions, the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act, P.L.
No. 103–465, 1994 U.S.C.C.A.N.
(108 Stat.) 4809, 5011 of December
9, 1994, eliminated the exception
to the accuracy-related penalty
attributable to a substantial
understatement for which the
taxpayer had substantial authority
and a reasonable belief that its
treatment was more likely than not
the proper treatment as it applied
to corporations.
-
For corporate tax shelter items
relating to transactions occurring
after December 8, 1994, the
taxpayer may meet the reasonable
cause exception in IRC section
6664(c) by establishing legal
justification. Legal
justification, as defined in
Treas. Reg. 1–6664–4(e), includes
any justification under the
federal tax law for the treatment
or characterization of the tax
shelter item or of the entity,
plan, or arrangement that gave
rise to the item. A corporation
establishes legal justification
with respect to a tax shelter item
if:
-
The corporation has first met
the standard for substantial
authority and reasonable
belief (see IRM 20.1.5.8.4.1),
and
-
All relevant facts and
circumstances (in addition to
the corporation’s legal
justification) are taken into
account and indicate that the
corporation acted with
reasonable cause and in good
faith.
-
Note: If
a corporate taxpayer has a
substantial understatement
that is attributable to a tax
shelter item, the
accuracy-related penalty
attributable to a substantial
understatement applies to the
understatement unless the
taxpayer has reasonable cause.
-
The reasonable cause exception
for corporate tax shelter
items may also be met under
general guidelines in IRM
20.1.5.6.1 and 20.1.1.
20.1.5.8.4.4 (08-20-1998)
Reasonable Cause
- The
accuracy-related penalty
attributable to a substantial
understatement will not be applied
if the taxpayer shows reasonable
cause for the understatement and
acted in a good faith effort to
derive the correct tax liability.
(See IRM 20.1.1 and 20.1.5.6.1 for a
more detailed discussion of the
reasonable cause exception and
Treas. Reg. 1.6664–4 for examples.)
- See
Treas. Reg. 1.6664–4(c) and IRM
20.1.5.6.1 for reliance on tax
advice in meeting the reasonable
cause exception.
20.1.5.9
(08-20-1998)
IRC Sections 6662(e) and 6662(h):
Substantial and Gross Valuation
Misstatement
- OBRA 89
repealed IRC section 6659, Valuation
Overstatements, and replaced it with the
Accuracy-Related Penalty attributable to
a Substantial Valuation Overstatement
under IRC section 6662(e), effective for
returns due after December 31, 1989
(without regard to extensions). OBRA 89
introduced the following provisions:
-
Under IRC section 6662(e), a 20
percent penalty is imposed on the
portion of any underpayment of tax
caused by a substantial valuation
overstatement, and
-
Under IRC section 6662(h), the
penalty is increased to 40 percent
in the case of a gross valuation
overstatement.
- OBRA 90
redesignated IRC section 6662(e) as
"Substantial Valuation Misstatement"
under Chapter 1 and added a penalty for
valuation misstatements under IRC
section 482. IRC section 6662(h) also
redefined gross valuation misstatements.
These changes are effective for tax
years ending after November 5, 1990.
- OBRA 93:
-
Amended IRC section 6662(e)(1)(B)(ii),
so that the substantial valuation
misstatement amount for an IRC
section 482 transfer price
adjustment, went from $10,000,000 to
the lesser of $5,000,000 or 10
percent of the taxpayer’s gross
receipts,
-
Amended IRC section 6662(h)(2)(A)(iii),
-
Added IRC section 6662(e)(3)(D), and
-
Substantially amended IRC section
adjustments are excluded from a net
transfer pricing adjustment.
-
Valuation misstatements fall into two
categories: substantial and gross. Each
type of valuation misstatement has
different criteria for the assertion of
the accuracy-related penalty and
different penalty rates.
- Final
regulations under IRC section 6662(e)
for net IRC section 482 transfer price
adjustments were issued and are
effective on February 9, 1996. However,
taxpayers may elect to apply the
regulations contained in Treas. Reg.
1.6662–6, to all open taxable years
beginning after December 31, 1993.
20.1.5.9.1 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Assertion
- The
examining officer is responsible for
the assertion of the accuracy-related
penalty attributable to a valuation
misstatement penalty.
- The
substantial valuation misstatement
penalty is 20 percent of the
applicable underpayment.
- No
penalty shall be imposed unless the
underpayment attributable to the
misstatement is greater than $5,000
($10,000 for corporations, except S
corporations and personal holding
companies).
- In
order to monitor and gather
information relative to the transfer
pricing penalty, the Service formed
the IRC section 6662(e) Penalty
Oversight Committee to review these
cases. See Announcement 96–16,
1996–13, I.R.B. 22.
20.1.5.9
IRC Sections 6662(e) and 6662(h):
Substantial and Gross Valuation
Misstatement
20.1.5.9.2 (08-20-1998)
IRC Section 6662(e)(1)(A): Valuation
Misstatement
- A
substantial valuation misstatement
occurs when the value (or adjusted
basis) of any property claimed on any
return is 200 percent or more of the
corrected amount and there is an
underpayment of tax. This applies for
years beginning after December 31,
1989 (determined without regard to
extensions).
- The
penalty is 20 percent of the
underpayment attributable to the
adjusted property.
20.1.5.9.3 (08-20-1998)
IRC Section 6662(e)(1)(B)(i)
& (ii): Valuation Misstatement
Penalties for Transfer Pricing
Transactions under IRC
Section 482
- IRC
section 6662(e) imposes two transfer
pricing penalties applicable to
transactions between or among two or
more organizations, trades or business
owned or controlled by the same
interests. These valuation
misstatement penalties are identified
as the transaction penalty and the net
adjustment penalty.
-
The Transactional Penalty.
This penalty applies when the price
reported for any property or services
is 200 percent or more (or 50 percent
or less) than the correct price under
the arm’s length standard of IRC
section 482.
-
The Net Adjustment Penalty.
This penalty applies:
- To
returns the due date for which
(determined without regard to
extensions) is after November 5,
1990 and before January 1, 1994,
when the IRC section 482
adjustment exceeds $10 million,
and
- To
returns the due date for which
(determined without regard to
extensions) is after December 31,
1993, when the IRC section 482
adjustment exceeds the lesser of
$5 million or 10 percent of the
taxpayer’s gross receipts.
- The
term "price for any property or
services" encompasses all kinds of
adjustments under IRC section 482,
including purchase prices, fees,
services, rents, interest, and
advances.
- For
the net IRC section 482 adjustments
that are excluded from the penalty,
see IRC section 6662(e)(3)(B) and
Treas. Reg. 1.6662–6(d). For example
calculations see Treas. Reg.
1.6662–6(c)(7).
- The
penalty is 20 percent of the
underpayment attributable to the
adjusted property.
-
Exhibit 20.1.5–4 contains a flow chart
for the IRC section 6662(e) Transfer
Pricing Penalty.
20.1.5.9.4 (08-20-1998)
IRC Section 6662(h): Gross Valuation
Misstatement
- A
gross valuation misstatement occurs:
- If
the value (or adjusted basis) of
any property on a return of tax
under Chapter 1 is 400 percent or
more of the adjusted amount, or
- If
the price for any property or
service (or for the use of
property) claimed on any return is
400 percent or more (or 25 percent
or less) of the amount determined
under IRC section 482 to be the
correct price, or
- If
a net IRC section 482 transfer
price adjustment exceeds 1.)
$20,000,000, for years beginning
after November 5, 1990 and before
January 1, 1994, or 2.) the lesser
of $20,000,000 or 20 percent of
the taxpayer’s gross receipts for
years beginning after December 31,
1993.
- The
penalty is 40 percent of the portion
of the underpayment to which this
section applies.
20.1.5.9.5 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Calculation
- The
substantial valuation penalty applies
to the individual income tax return in
the example below because both
conditions for assertion are met (no
exceptions to the penalty apply and
the amount of the understatement and
the underpayment are equal):
-
Example:
-
Price of property (or adjusted
basis) as reported on the return
_$46,000
-
Price as adjusted by examination
_20,000
-
200 percent times the amount in
(b) _40,000
-
Note: Condition #1 is met. The
value reported on the return of
$46,000 is more than 200 percent
of the adjusted amount of $20,000
($46,000 divided by $20,000 = 230
percent).
-
Amount adjusted (line "a." less
line "b." ) _$26,000
-
Underpayment on 26,000 _7,000
-
Penalty (20 percent times $7,000)
_1,400
-
Note: Condition #2 is met. The
underpayment of $7,000
attributable to the misstatement
of $26,000 exceeds the required
$5,000.
- If the
adjusted value in (2) above were
$10,000, the amount reported of
$46,000 would then exceed the adjusted
amount ($10,000) by more than 400
percent ($46,000 divided by $10,000 =
460 percent). The gross valuation
misstatement penalty would then apply
at 40 percent of the applicable
underpayment.
- For
example calculations involving
carryovers and flow through entities,
see IRM 5.2.2 and Treas. Regs.
1.6662–5(d) and (h).
- The
penalty is considered separately for
each property adjusted. To distinguish
between a substantial and a gross
valuation misstatement requires a
property-by-property calculation. (See
Treas. Reg. 1.6662–5(f).)
- For
example calculations for the net IRC
section 482 adjustment, see Treas.
Reg. 1.6662–6(c)(7).
- With
regard to the transfer pricing penalty
under IRC section 6662(e); please
refer to the rules for coordinating
between the transactional penalty and
the net adjustment penalty illustrated
by examples in Treas. Reg.
1.6662–6(f).
20.1.5.9.6 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Assessment
- See
IRM 20.1.5.5, Penalty Assessment.
20.1.5.9.7 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Relief
- Refer
to IRC section 6662(e)(3)(B) and
Treas. Regs. 1.6662–6(b)(3) and
(c)(6).
20.1.5.9.7.1 (08-20-1998)
Reasonable Cause
- IRC
section 6664(c) provides an
exception to the penalty if the
taxpayer has reasonable cause and
acted in good faith. (See IRM 20.1.1
for a more detailed discussion of
general reasonable cause
exceptions.)
- The
reasonable cause exception applies
to the transfer pricing penalties
(IRC section 6662(e) and Treas. Reg.
1.6662–6) only under certain
circumstances.
-
For the transactional penalty
(see IRM 20.1.5.9.3 and IRC
section 6662(e)(1)(B)(i)), a
taxpayer must meet the
reasonable cause requirements of
Treas. Regs. 1.6664–4 to avoid
the penalty.
-
However, for the net adjustment
penalty (see IRM 20.1.5.9.3, the
reasonable cause and good faith
requirements under IRC section
6664(c) are met only if the
taxpayer fulfills either the
specified or unspecified method
and documentation requirements.
- A
different definition of "advice"
applies in the case of the transfer
pricing penalties under IRC section
6662(e) and Treas. Reg. 1.6662–6.
Where a taxpayer has relied on
professional analysis in determining
its transfer pricing, whether the
professional is an employee of, or
related to, the taxpayer is not
determinative in evaluating whether
the taxpayer reasonably relied in
good faith on advice.
-
Refer to Rev. Proc. 94–33 (1994–1
C.B. 628) regarding reasonable cause
for tax years beginning before
December 31, 1993.
20.1.5.9.7.2 (08-20-1998)
Charitable Deduction
- The
taxpayer will not satisfy the good
faith test by merely relying on an
appraisal. The taxpayer will not be
considered to have reasonably relied
in good faith on advice unless the
requirements of Treas. Reg.
1–6664–4(b) and (c) are met.
- In
addition, the taxpayer must meet the
requirements in Treas. Reg.
1.6664–4(g) specifically on
charitable deduction property.
- When
there is an underpayment due to
overstated charitable deduction
property, the reasonable cause
exception under IRC section
6664(c)(2) applies only if the
following two conditions are first
met:
-
The claimed value of the
property was based on a
"qualified appraisal" made by a
"qualified appraiser," and
-
The taxpayer made a good faith
investigation of the value of
the contributed property. (See
Treas. Reg. 1.6664–4(g).)
20.1.5.10
(08-20-1998)
IRC Section 6662(f): Substantial
Overstatement of Pension Liabilities
- OBRA 89
repealed IRC section 6659A and replaced
it with IRC section 6662(f), Substantial
Overstatement of Pension Liabilities,
for returns due after December 31, 1989
without regard to extensions.
- An
overstatement of pension liabilities
occurs when the actuarial determination
of the liabilities taken into account
for purposes of computing the employer
contribution deduction under IRC section
404 exceeds the correct amount.
- See IRM
20.1.5.2.2 for carrybacks and
carryovers, and IRM 20.1.5.2.3 for the
definition of an underpayment.
20.1.5.10.1 (08-20-1998)
IRC Section 6662(f): Overstatement
- The
penalty for substantial overstatement
of pension liabilities applies when:
-
The amount deducted on the return
as the actuarial determination of
the liabilities taken into account
to compute the deduction under IRC
section 404(a) exceeds the correct
amount by 200 percent, and
-
The underpayment attributable to
the substantial overstatement of
pension liabilities exceeds
$1,000.
- The
penalty is 20 percent of the
underpayment attributable to the
overstatement of pension liabilities.
- The
gross valuation misstatement penalty
applies to an overstated deduction for
pension liabilities when:
-
The amount deducted on the return
is 400 percent or more of the
correct amount, and
-
The related underpayment is more
than $1,000.
- The
penalty is 40 percent of the
underpayment attributable to the
overstatement of pension liabilities.
(See IRC section 6662(h)(1).)
20.1.5.10.2 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Calculation
- The
following example illustrates the
penalty criteria and calculation:
-
Example:
-
The taxpayer’s 1990 return had
taxable income of $300,000 and tax
of $98,000.
- In
determining the amount of taxable
income, the taxpayer deducted
$80,000 for contributions to a
defined benefit pension plan
maintained for its employees.
-
Upon examination of the taxpayer’s
return, the Service adjusted the
interest assumption in valuing the
pension liabilities for
calculating the deduction.
-
The taxpayer’s maximum deduction
for contributions to its plan was
accordingly adjusted from $80,000
to $35,000.
-
There were no other adjustments on
the return.
-
Note: The 200 percent requirement is
met when the amount deducted on the
return ($80,000) exceeds the correct
amount ($35,000) by more than 200
percent ($80,000 divided by $35,000 =
229 percent). The penalty is
calculated as follows:
-
Taxable income as
adjusted: ($300,000 + $45,000)
_$345,000
-
Tax liability as adjusted _111,500
-
Tax liability as filed _98,000
-
Underpayment ( "2" less "3" )
_13,500
-
Penalty rate 20% _20%
-
Penalty ( "5" times "4" ) _2,700
-
Note: since the deduction claimed
exceeds the corrected amount by more
than 200 percent, but is less than 400
percent, the penalty applies at the 20
percent rate. If the corrected
deduction were $18,000, the percentage
of the overstatement would be 445
percent ($80,000 divided by $18,000)
and the penalty would apply at the 40
percent rate.
- See
Notice 89–47, 1989–1 C.B. 687, for
guidance on the calculation of the
penalty. While this notice applies to
IRC section 6659A that has been
repealed, the examples contained in
the notice still provide guidance in
the mechanics of calculating the
penalty.
20.1.5.10.3 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Relief
- The
burden is on the taxpayer to establish
the grounds for an
exception.
- The
penalty will not apply if the taxpayer
shows that there was a reasonable
cause for the valuation or assumptions
used in deriving the deduction on the
return and that the taxpayer acted in
good faith.
- See
IRM 20.1.5.6.2 and Treas. Reg.
1.6664–4(c) for reliance on advice of
an actuary or other professional as it
relates to the reasonable cause
exception in IRC section 6664(c).
20.1.5.11
(08-20-1998)
IRC Section 6662(g): Substantial
Estate or Gift Tax Valuation
Understatement
- OBRA 89
redesignated IRC section 6660 as
6662(g), Substantial Estate or Gift Tax
Valuation Understatement penalty.
- The
penalty applies to any return of tax
imposed under Subtitle B due after
December 31, 1989, without regard to
extensions.
- See IRM
20.1.5.2.2 for carrybacks and
carryovers, and IRM 20.1.5.2.3 for the
definition of an underpayment.
20.1.5.11.1 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Assertion
-
Substantial Valuation Understatement.
There is a substantial estate or gift
tax valuation understatement if:
-
The portion of the underpayment
attributable to the valuation
understatement exceeds $5,000, and
-
The value of any property claimed
on a return is 50 percent or less
of the corrected amount.
-
The penalty is 20 percent of the
underpayment attributable to the
valuation understatement.
-
Gross Valuation Understatement.
There is a gross valuation
misstatement under IRC section
6662(h)(2)(C) if:
-
The portion of the underpayment
attributable to the valuation
understatement exceeds $5,000, and
-
The value of any property claimed
on a return is 25 percent or less
of the corrected amount.
-
The penalty is 40 percent of the
underpayment attributable to the
valuation understatement.
20.1.5.11.2 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Calculation
- The
determination of whether the
percentage threshold for a substantial
or gross valuation misstatement has
been reached is made on a
property-by-property basis.
- To
calculate the valuation understatement
percentage, divide the value of the
property reported on the return by the
corrected value of the property.
- The
following example illustrates the
calculation of the understatement
percentage for three adjustments
(assuming the $5,000 requirement is
met for each undervaluation adjustment
and no exceptions to the penalty
apply).
-
Example: The
decedent’s estate tax return included
stock in three closely held
corporations, A, B and C. On the
return the stock in each corporation
was valued at $80,000. On examination
the corrected stock values were
determined to be $150,000 for A,
$190,000 for B, and $330,000 for C.
The following determinations are made:
-
Stock A: The amount on the return
($80,000), divided by the
corrected amount ($150,000) is 53
percent. The penalty does not
apply to this adjustment because
the value of the stock is not 50
percent or less of the corrected
amount.
-
Stock B: The amount on the return
($80,000), divided by the
corrected amount ($190,000) is 42
percent. The accuracy-related
penalty attributable to a
substantial valuation misstatement
penalty applies to this adjustment
because the value of Stock B is
less than 50 percent (but more
than 25 percent) of the corrected
amount. The penalty amount is 20
percent of the underpayment
attributable to the adjustment for
Stock B.
-
Stock C: The amount on the return
($80,000), divided by the
corrected amount ($330,000) is 24
percent. The accuracy-related
penalty attributable to a gross
valuation misstatement penalty
applies to this adjustment because
the value of Stock C is 25 percent
or less of the corrected amount.
The penalty amount is 40 percent
of the underpayment attributable
to the adjustment for Stock C.
- For
penalty calculations that relate to
the above adjustments, see Exhibit
20.1.5–5.
20.1.5.11.3 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Assessment
- See
IRM 20.1.5.5 for assessment of the
accuracy-related penalty attributable
to a substantial estate or gift tax
valuation understatement.
20.1.5.11.4 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Relief
-
Reasonable cause.
IRC section 6664(c) provides an
exception to the penalty if there is
reasonable cause for the underpayment
and the valuation was made in good
faith. See IRM 20.1.5.6.1.
-
Reliance on Advice.
See IRM 20.1.5.6.2 and Treas. Reg.
1.6664–4 for reliance on the advice of
an appraiser or other professional as
it relates to the reasonable cause
exception in IRC section 6664(c).
20.1.5.12
(08-20-1998)
IRC Section 6663: Civil Fraud Penalty
- The
fraud penalty under IRC section 6653(b)
was redesignated by OBRA 89 as IRC
section 6663. This change is effective
for returns filed after December 31,
1989.
- OBRA 89
did not alter the definition of fraud or
the penalty calculation. The penalty is
asserted at the rate of 75 percent of
the underpayment attributable to fraud.
- For
coordination between the civil fraud
penalty and the accuracy-related
penalties see IRM 20.1.5.2..
20.1.5.12.1 (08-20-1998)
Indications of Fraud
- Civil
fraud is defined as an intentional
wrongdoing designed to evade a tax
that the taxpayer believed to be
owing. Thus, mere negligence or
ignorance of the law does not
constitute fraud.
- Since
direct proof of a taxpayer’s
fraudulent intent is rarely available,
fraud may be proven by circumstantial
evidence and reasonable inferences.
Fraud will generally involve one or
more of the following elements:
-
Deception,
-
Misrepresentation of material
facts,
-
False or altered documents,
-
Evasion, (i.e., diversion or
omission), or
-
Conspiracy.
- Some
common "badges of fraud" include:
-
Understatement of income, e.g., by
omissions of specific items or
entire sources of income, failure
to report substantial amounts of
income received;
-
Fictitious or improper deductions,
e.g., overstatement of deductions,
personal items deducted as
business expenses;
-
Accounting irregularities, e.g.,
two sets of books, false entries
on documents;
-
Acts of the taxpayer evidencing an
intention to evade tax, e.g.,
false statements, destruction of
records, transfer of assets;
- A
consistent pattern over several
years of underreporting taxable
income;
-
Implausible or inconsistent
explanations of behavior;
-
Failure to cooperate with the
examining agent;
-
Concealment of assets;
-
Engaging in illegal activities
(e.g., drug dealing) or attempting
to conceal illegal activities;
-
Inadequate records, and
-
dealing in cash.
-
Recommendations for asserting the
civil fraud penalty should be
carefully reviewed to fully establish
that the evidence supports the
assertion.
20.1.5.12.2 (08-20-1998)
Assertion
- Civil
fraud penalties will be asserted when
there is clear and convincing evidence
to prove that some part of the
underpayment of tax was due to civil
fraud. Such evidence must show the
taxpayer’s intent to evade the payment
of tax which the taxpayer believed to
be owing. Intent is distinguished from
inadvertence, reliance on incorrect
technical advice, honest difference of
opinion, negligence, or carelessness.
- To
assert the civil fraud penalty in a
tax case, it is necessary to establish
that a part of the deficiency is due
to a knowingly false representation of
facts by the taxpayer. The Service
bears the burden of proving civil
fraud by clear and convincing evidence
in the Tax Court. See IRC section
7454. The Service must show that:
-
The taxpayer knew the content of
the return was false; and
-
Made the return with the intent to
evade tax.
- The
civil fraud penalty should be asserted
on a case-by-case basis giving
consideration to all factors which
have a bearing on the taxpayer’s
fraudulent intent.
- The
civil fraud penalty cannot be asserted
on the same underpayment (or portion
of an underpayment) on which the
accuracy-related penalties are
asserted under IRC section 6662. Only
one penalty can be applied to any
portion of an underpayment of tax.
- The
criteria for proving fraudulent
failure to file under IRC section
6651(f) and civil fraud under IRC
section 6663, are the same. Although
there is no specific prohibition
against asserting penalties under both
IRC sections 6651(f) and 6663, caution
should be used when considering this
action. The court is not likely to
sustain the assertion of both
penalties unless compelling facts
support the Service’s position.
Accordingly, consult Chief Counsel
before asserting both these penalties
on the same return.
-
The civil fraud penalty is not
asserted for failure to file a
return or for filing a return
late. OBRA 89 added the fraudulent
failure to file penalty under IRC
section 6651(f) for this purpose.
-
Fraudulent failure to file is
discussed in IRM 20.1.2.
- On a
joint return, the civil fraud penalty
does not apply to a spouse unless some
part of the underpayment is due to
civil fraud on the part of that
spouse. IRC section 6663(c).
-
For taxpayers filing a joint
return after having filed separate
returns, see IRC section
6013(b)(5).
-
The civil fraud penalty follows
the Code provision that allows a
married couple to file a joint
return after separate returns have
been filed.
- If
the amount shown on two separate
returns ($150 plus $100 = $250) is
less than the amount shown on the
joint return ($300), then for the
purpose of computing the civil
fraud penalty, the amount shown on
the separate returns is treated as
the amount shown on the joint
return.
-
Any fraud on either separate
return will be deemed to be fraud
on the joint return.
- As a
general rule, neither Collection nor
Taxpayer Service is authorized to
assess the civil fraud penalty. When
fraud is identified by one of these
functions, the case must be referred
to Examination or TE/GE for
investigation.
- In
cases closing unagreed with the civil
fraud penalty, the report must include
all the alternative penalty positions
that are most applicable. Litigation
(or settlement) of the case without an
explanation of the alternative penalty
positions in the report would hamper
the government’s litigating position
because the basis for the alternative
penalty position(s) would be unclear
to either Appeals or Area Counsel.
- The
examiner’s report will reflect the
civil fraud penalty by code section on
a separate attachment, identifying the
adjustment(s) attributable to the
penalty. Form 3198, Special Handling
Notice, will be attached to the case.
- For
information regarding restrictions on
the assertion of the civil fraud
penalty with respect to the failure to
file and fraudulent failure to file
penalty, see IRM 20.1.2.
20.1.5.12.3 (08-20-1998)
Statute of Limitations
-
Examiners are responsible for
protecting the statute of limitations
for assessment. Cover letter L–907 may
be used for this purpose.
- IRC
section 6501(c)(1) extends the statute
of limitations for assessment on false
or fraudulent returns indefinitely.
- When
the three year statute of limitations
under IRC section 6501(a) is in
jeopardy, the examiner should try to
secure an extension whenever possible.
If in litigation it is determined that
the taxpayer did not commit civil
fraud, then the statute of limitations
for the assessment of the underlying
tax and penalties will have expired.
- The
six year statute of limitations
applies when the taxpayer omits more
than 25 percent of the:
-
Gross income reported on the
return, (IRC section 6501(e)(1)),
-
Gross estate or total amount of
gifts stated on the return, (IRC
section 6501(e)(2)), or
-
Excise tax reported on the return,
(IRC section 6501(e)(3)).
-
Criminal Investigation (CI) must give
approval to solicit a consent to
extend the statute of limitations for
assessment on joint return
investigations.
20.1.5.12.4 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Referral
- When
an examiner determines that only the
civil fraud penalty would apply, a
referral to Criminal Investigation
(CI) is not required. Referral
guidelines to CI are contained in
functional manuals.
20.1.5.12.5 (08-20-1998)
Civil and Criminal Fraud
- The
major difference between civil and
criminal fraud is the degree of proof
required to establish fraud on the
part of the taxpayer.
-
Criminal fraud requires sufficient
evidence to prove guilt beyond a
reasonable doubt.
-
Civil fraud requires clear and
convincing evidence of tax
evasion.
- The
civil fraud penalty may be imposed
upon a taxpayer whose criminal case
verdict was
not guilty
. If the taxpayer has been
convicted of criminal tax evasion
under IRC section 7201, the civil
fraud penalty should be asserted for
the same tax year.
-
However, the criminal case conviction
does not mean the civil penalty will
be automatically sustained.
20.1.5.12.6 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Calculation
- The
civil fraud penalty is derived by
multiplying the 75 percent penalty
rate times the underpayment
attributable to civil fraud. For the
definition of underpayment see IRM
20.1.5.2.3(8) and Treas. Reg.
1–6664–2.
- For an
example calculation involving the
accuracy-related penalty and the civil
fraud penalty see Exhibit 21.1.5–2.
- If any
part of the underpayment is due to
civil fraud, then the entire
underpayment shall be treated as
attributable to civil fraud unless the
taxpayer establishes otherwise. The
examiner will make a good faith effort
to objectively weigh the evidence
provided and eliminate those items
that are inaccurate, but not
fraudulent. (See IRC section 6663(b).)
20.1.5.12.7 (08-20-1998)
Civil Fraud Penalty Monitoring and
Procedures
- Form
6809, Civil Fraud Penalty Report, is
used to record and monitor all cases
in which the civil fraud penalty is an
issue. This includes referrals
initiated by Examination and requests
by CI for Examination assistance not
based on a referral.
- A
separate Form 6809, Civil Fraud
Penalty Report, must be prepared for
each person or legal entity involved.
However, only one Form 6809 is
prepared for a joint return.
- Upon
establishing a civil fraud penalty
case, prepare Form 6809 in triplicate,
completing items 1–11. Forward one
copy to the Field Territory Manager
(or designee) to serve as a territory
control. Retain the original and one
copy in the case file.
20.1.5.12.8 (08-20-1998)
Penalty Assessment
- The
total civil fraud penalty will be
assessed using:
-
Form 5344, Examination Closing
Record,
-
Form 5403, Appeals Closing Record,
-
Form 5599, EO Examined Closing
Record, or
-
Form 5650, EP Examined Closing
Record.
- The
penalty is assessed to the Master File
using TC 320.
- The
penalty is assessed to the Non-Master
File using:
-
Form 4720, Return of Certain
Excise Taxes on Charities and
Other Persons Under Chapters 41
and 42 of the IRC,
-
Form 5330, Return of Initial
Excise Taxes related to Employee
Benefit Plans, or
-
Form 5434, Non-Master File
Assessment Voucher.
- The
Form 5434 will be processed with the
tax return using established
functional guidelines.
Exhibit 20.1.5.12-1 (08-20-1998)
Calculation of an Underpayment
|
Reference: Section 20.1.5.2.3 and
Treas. Reg. 1.6664–(3)(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
following example illustrates how
an underpayment is computed: |
|
|
|
(a) |
Corrected tax _ |
$10,000 |
|
|
|
(b) |
Less: Tax per return _ |
$7,000 |
|
|
|
(c) |
plus
any amounts not previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
assessed or collected without
assessment _ |
$0 |
|
|
|
(d) |
plus
any amount of rebates made _ |
$0 |
|
|
|
(e) |
Underpayment ($10,000 less $7,000)
_ |
$3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of the Underpayment
with Multiple Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment A (no penalty imposed)
_ |
$ 1,000 |
|
Adjustment B (accuracy-related) _ |
40,000 |
|
Adjustment C (Civil fraud penalty) |
45,000 |
|
Total
adjustments (A + B + C) _ |
86,000 |
|
Plus: Taxable income shown on the
return _ |
15,800 |
|
Taxable income as corrected _ |
101,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computation of underpayment: |
|
|
Corrected tax _ |
$ 25,828 |
|
Less: |
Tax
shown on return _ |
−2,374 |
|
|
Previous assessments _ |
0 |
|
|
Rebates _ |
0 |
|
Underpayment _ |
23,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computation of the portions of the
underpayment on which accuracy and
fraud penalties are separately
asserted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STEP
I: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determine the portion of the
underpayment on which no
accuracy-related or civil fraud
penalty is imposed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable income shown on return _ |
$ 15,800 |
|
|
Plus: Adjustment A _ |
1,000 |
|
|
Adjusted taxable income _ |
16,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax on
adjusted taxable income _ |
2,524 |
|
|
Less: Tax shown on return _ |
2,374 |
|
|
Portion of underpayment on which |
|
|
|
no
penalty is imposed _ |
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STEP
II: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determine the portion of the
underpayment on which the
accuracy-related penalty
attributable to a substantial
underpayment penalty of 20 percent
is imposed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted taxable income from Step
I _ |
$ 16,800 |
|
|
Plus: Adjustment B _ |
40,000 |
|
|
Adjusted taxable income _ |
56,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax on
adjusted taxable income _ |
11,880 |
|
|
Less: Tax on adjusted taxable |
|
|
|
income from Step I _ |
2,524 |
|
|
Portion of underpayment on which
the |
|
|
|
20%
penalty is imposed _ |
9,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STEP
III: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determine the portion of the
underpayment on which a civil
fraud penalty rate of 75 percent
is imposed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
underpayment _ |
$ 23,454 |
|
|
Less: The underpayment determined
in Step I _ |
− 150 |
|
|
Less: The underpayment determined
in Step II _ |
−9,356 |
|
|
Portion of underpayment on which |
|
|
|
the
75 percent penalty is imposed _ |
13,948 |
Exhibit 20.1.5.12-2 (08-20-1998)
Calculation of the Accuracy-Related
Penalty Attributable to a
Substantial Understatement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference: Section 20.1.5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The amount of the
understatement is derived as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Corrected tax _ |
$8,500 |
|
|
(b) |
Less: tax on return _ |
2,000 |
|
|
(c) |
Less: rebates _ |
100 |
|
|
(d) |
Less: tax on adjustments with no
penalty _ |
600 |
|
|
(e) |
Understatement _ |
5,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) For the penalty to apply in
the above example, the
understatement of $5,800 must be
more than the greater of $5,000 or
$850 (i.e., 10 percent of the
$8,500 corrected tax required to
be shown on the return). The
understatement of $5,800 meets the
requirement for penalty assertion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) In
calculating the understatement in
(2) above the following
definitions apply: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Rebates: An amount not showing
on the return which has been
assessed or collected as a
deficiency prior to the filing of
the return. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Exceptions: Substantial
authority, adequate disclosure,
and reasonable cause are
exceptions to the penalty. See IRM
20.1.5.8.4.1 for discussion of
substantial authority. Each return
adjustment is reviewed separately
to determine if any exceptions
apply. When an exception applies
to any adjustment, the tax on that
adjustment is not used in
determining the amount of the
understatement or the amount of
the underpayment to which the
penalty applies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) To
establish the amount of the
penalty when not all adjustments
are subject to the penalty: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
calculate the total underpayment, |
|
|
(b) |
calculate the underpayment subject
to an exception, |
|
|
(c) |
subtract (b) from (a), and |
|
|
(d) |
multiply the applicable penalty
rate times (c). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) The following calculations
establish if an understatement is
substantial (no rebates or
exceptions to the penalty apply): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
The
taxpayer failed to report income
of $25,000 on his tax return: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Corrected tax _ |
$20,000 |
|
|
|
2. |
Less: tax as reported on return _ |
12,000 |
|
|
|
3. |
Understatement _ |
8,000 |
|
|
|
4. |
Ten
percent of corrected tax _ |
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
(10%
of $20,000 = $2,000) |
|
|
|
|
5. |
The
greater of $5,000 or $2,000 _ |
5,000 |
|
|
|
6. |
Since
the $8,000 understatement exceeds
$5,000, the understatement is
substantial and meets the
requirement for assertion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
The
taxpayer failed to report $247,000
of Schedule C income: |
|
|
|
1. |
Corrected tax: _ |
$67,000 |
|
|
|
|
(Note: this includes any
adjustment to self-employment
tax.) |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Less: tax as reported on return _ |
61,000 |
|
|
|
3. |
Understatement _ |
6,000 |
|
|
|
4. |
The
greater of $5,000 or $6,700 _ |
6,700 |
|
|
|
|
(Note: $6,700 is 10 percent of
corrected tax of $67,000.) |
|
|
|
|
5. |
The
understatement of $6,000 does not
exceed the greater of $5,000 or 10
percent of the corrected tax,
i.e., $6,700. The underpayment is
therefore not substantial and the
penalty cannot be asserted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) The accuracy-related penalty
attributable to a substantial
understatement will not be
asserted on the same portion of
the underpayment attributable to
adjustments for which another
accuracy-related penalty under IRC
section 6662 or the civil fraud
penalty under IRC section 6663 has
been asserted. |
Exhibit 20.1.5.12-3 (08-20-1998)
Calculation of the Accuracy-Related
Penalty Attributable to a
Substantial Understatement with
Multiple Adjustments
|
|
|
Reference: Section 20.1.5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
taxpayer has substantial authority
for adjustment A. The
accuracy-related penalty
attributable to a substantial
understatement under IRC section
6662(d) applies to adjustments B
and C. The taxpayer has uncredited
withholding of $1,500.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable income per return _ |
$18,200 |
|
|
Adjustments per examination: |
|
|
|
Adjustment A (non-tax shelter
item) _ |
5,300 |
|
|
|
Adjustment B _ |
10,000 |
|
|
|
Adjustment C _ |
18,000 |
|
|
|
Total
(A + B + C) _ |
+
33,300 |
|
|
Corrected taxable income _ |
51,500 |
|
|
Corrected tax _ |
17,000 |
|
|
Less: Tax on return _ |
−
2,500 |
|
|
Understatement _ |
14,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable income per return _ |
18,200 |
|
|
Plus: Adjustment A (no penalty) _ |
+
5,300 |
|
|
Corrected taxable income |
|
|
|
(Adjustment A) _ |
23,500 |
|
|
Corrected tax on $23,500 _ |
3,300 |
|
|
Less: Tax per return _ |
−
2,500 |
|
|
Tax on
Adjustment A _ |
800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corrected tax liability _ |
$17,000 |
|
|
Less: Tax on return _ |
−2,500 |
|
|
Less: Tax on Adjustment A (no
penalty) _ |
−
800 |
|
|
Understatement (for penalty
purposes) _ |
13,700 |
|
|
Less: Adjustment to increased
withholding credits _ |
−
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underpayment _ |
$12,200 |
Exhibit 20.1.5.12-4 (08-20-1998)
IRC Section 6662(e)—Transfer Pricing
Penalty
Exhibit 20.1.5.12-5 (08-20-1998)
Substantial and Gross Valuation
Misstatement Penalties
|
Reference: 20.1.5.11.2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
penalties are calculated on the
amount of the underpayment
attributable to each valuation
understatement. The penalties are
calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) The following adjustments and
penalties apply: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Stock
A adjustment (no penalty applies)
$150,000 less 80,000 _
|
$70,000 |
|
|
|
2. |
Stock
B adjustment (substantial
valuation misstatement penalty
applies)
$190,000 less 80,000 _
|
$110,000 |
|
|
|
3. |
Stock
C adjustment (gross valuation
misstatement penalty applies)
$330,000 less 80,000 _ |
$250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Calculation of the
underpayment for adjustments on
which no penalty is applicable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Taxable income as filed _ |
$1,500,000 |
|
|
|
2. |
Adjustment without penalty _ |
$70,000 |
|
|
|
3. |
Adjusted taxable amount (line 1
plus 2) _ |
$1,570,000 |
|
|
|
4. |
Tax on
line 3 _ |
$707,000 |
|
|
|
5. |
Tax on
return _ |
$675,000 |
|
|
|
6. |
Underpayment attributable to
$70,000 adjustment _ |
$32,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Calculation of the
underpayment for a substantial
valuation misstatement penalty: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Amount
from line (a)3 _ |
$1,570,000 |
|
|
|
2. |
Adjustment having substantial
valuation misstatement penalty _ |
$110,000 |
|
|
|
3. |
Adjusted taxable amount (line 1
plus 2) _ |
$1,680,000 |
|
|
|
4. |
Tax on
line 3 _ |
$757,000 |
|
|
|
5. |
Amount
from line (b)4 _ |
$707,000 |
|
|
|
6. |
Underpayment attributable to
$110,000 (line 4 less 5) _ |
$50,000 |
|
|
|
7. |
Substantial valuation misstatement
penalty (20% of line 6) _ |
$10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Calculation of underpayment
for a gross valuation misstatement
penalty: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Amount
from (c)3 _ |
$1,680,000 |
|
|
|
2. |
Adjustment having gross valuation
misstatement penalty _ |
$250,000 |
|
|
|
3. |
Adjusted taxable amount (line 1
plus 2) _ |
$1,930,000 |
|
|
|
4. |
Tax on
line 3 _ |
$869,000 |
|
|
|
5. |
Amount
from line (c)4 _ |
$757,000 |
|
|
|
6. |
Underpayment attributable to
$250,000 (line 4 less 5) _ |
$112,000 |
|
|
|
7. |
Gross
Valuation Misstatement Penalty
(40% × $112,000) _ |
$44,800 |
20.1.6.1
(07-08-1999)
Overview of the Return Preparer
Penalty Program
- The Tax
Reform Act of 1976 provided the Service
with penalty and enjoinment authority to
more effectively monitor income tax
return preparation. TEFRA 1982 added IRC
sections 6700 and 6701 which are not
limited solely to income tax return
preparers. These provisions are designed
to promote a high standard in the
preparation of returns for compensation
and also address the problem of
fraudulent, unscrupulous, or incompetent
preparers.
- Return
preparer penalties relate to IRC
sections 6694, 6695, 6700, 6701, 6713,
7407 and 7408. In the interest of
overall sound tax administration, the
Service focuses on preparer conduct and
applies sanctions whenever warranted.
Penalty assertion is the key enforcement
vehicle for noncompliant preparers.
-
Consistent with Policy Statement P–1–18,
the Service will not automatically
assert preparer penalties based solely
on the determination of deficiencies
proposed in related tax return
examinations. Preparer penalties are not
mechanical components of the examination
process and are asserted only after due
deliberation on all facts and
circumstances.
- National
Headquarters, Area, and Service Center
functions will designate a Return
Preparer Coordinator (RPC), as
appropriate, to administer and monitor
tax return preparers activities.
20.1.6.1.1 (07-08-1999)
Program Coordination
Responsibilities
-
National Headquarters. The Director,
Compliance will designate a staff
member to functionally supervise, on a
nationwide basis, all Examination
aspects of the program.
- Area
Office. Each Area Director will
designate an analyst to manage and
monitor on an area basis all
Examination aspects of the program.
The area RPC will be responsible for:
-
Planning and coordinating
Examination activities related to
return preparers' activity with
other functions, areas, and
service centers;
-
Orienting appropriate area and
service center Examination
personnel;
-
Developing additional guidelines
and procedures considered
necessary;
-
Maintaining quality of
determinations and uniformity in
the application of the return
preparer provisions throughout the
region; and,
-
Monitoring program progress and
the applications of civil return
preparer penalties, identifying
problem areas, and notifying area
offices and National Headquarters
of appropriate solutions.
-
Director, Compliance, Office of
Taxpayer Service and Compliance (IN:C)
will be subject to all applicable
procedures and guidelines. IN:C:E
returns will also include Form 1040NR,
U.S. Nonresident Alien Income Tax
Return.
- Area
Office. Area Directors will establish
a multifunctional Penalty Screening
Committee (PSC), which includes the
Area Office Electronic Filing
Coordinator (DOEFC), Examination
Return Preparer (RPC) and a Criminal
Investigation (CI) representative.
Contact will be made with Service
Center representatives from the
Criminal Investigation (CI) and
Examination as needed.
- The
PSC will be responsible for:
-
Planning and coordinating the
implementation of Area and
National Headquarters Return
Preparer strategy;
-
Establishing viable communication
lines between Planning and Special
Programs (PSP), the Area
Electronic Filing (ELF)
Coordinator, the CI Questionable
Refund Program Coordinator (QRPC),
the Service Center Examination
RPC, and the CI RPC. A major goal
of the committee is to more
effectively identify patterns of
preparer abuse and prevent
duplication of efforts within the
Areas and Service Centers.
-
Holding monthly meetings during
the filing season and then
quarterly throughout the remainder
of the year. The committee
meetings will focus on monitoring
program results, analyzing
methods, and making
recommendations to the Area
Director concerning changes to the
program;
-
Reviewing all preparer case files
from whatever source, including
recommendations to initiate a
project on an identified preparer
and reports provided by site
visitation teams;
-
Receiving information referred
from area office functions,
Electronic Return Originator (ERO)
site visits, service center
reports, including Service Center
CI and Correspondence Examination
should be used to identify
potentially abusive preparers;
-
Coordinating site visitation teams
who will assert IRC section 6695
return preparer penalties, if
warranted, recommend initiation of
a Program Action case (PAC) or no
action. Examiners charge time for
site visits to activity code
522/500.
-
Coordinating site visitation teams
consists in:
-
Determining the number of teams
needed to conduct visitations;
-
Selecting and determining the
formation of teams;
-
Conducting orientation for team
members on ELF requirements,
return preparer provisions,
authority to conduct visits,
penalty assertions and referrals
to the PSC.
- Each
Field Territory Manager (or as
otherwise designated by the Area
Director in small areas), will
designate an RPC who will be
responsible for:
-
Accumulating all types of
referrals including those
forwarded by Service Center
Examination, and Form 5808, Return
Preparer Penalty Follow-up;
-
Preparing return preparers
summarization of referrals to the
area Penalty Screening Committee;
-
Accumulating, monitoring, and
forwarding the Form 5808 to the
appropriate Examination group for
resolution;
-
Ordering return preparer
information following the
procedures in IRM 20.1.6.2.1
below;
-
Ordering and screening returns;
-
Coordinating all Examination
activity of income tax returns
prepared by return preparers
approved for program action by the
Area Director;
-
Working closely with, and making
recommendations to, the Penalty
Screening Committee;
-
Communicating with the examiner
when a fraud referral is pending
on a particular preparer whose
penalty case investigation has
begun; and
-
Forwarding copies of completed
Forms 5809, Preparer Penalty Case
Control Card, to the area or
service center Electronic Filing
Coordinator. This information is
needed for the suitability checks
required in IRM 3.43, Electronic
Filing Systems Area Office
Coordinator's Handbook.
-
Working with the Disclosure Office
and/or Fed/State Coordinator to
obtain leads from the local state
tax agency on abusive preparers;
-
Releasing freeze code 570 with TC
571 for those returns received
from Service Center
Classification, through the PSC,
that will not be examined; and
releasing frozen refunds, at the
direction of the PSC, (either
partially or in the entirety) on
cases being held for examination.
(Note: In
all situations in which refunds
are held during an examination the
Area Director's approval is
required).
- The
Field Territory Manager may assign one
or more tax auditors or Compliance
Officers to the position of Market
Segment Specialization Program (MSSP)
Return Preparer Specialist (optional
at the discretion of area). The
position can be assigned to office or
field groups. These assignments will
be made in accordance with NTEU
negotiated agreement on MSSP
agreements.
-
Responsibilities of the position will
include:
-
Reviewing the case files upon
completion by the examiner to
ensure the facts and circumstances
regarding the preparation of the
return are fully developed; the
preparer's position is fairly and
carefully considered and clearly
reflected in the penalty case
workpapers; and the appropriate
copies of the income tax
examination workpapers, return and
tax change reports (Form 4549) are
included in the file;
-
Contacting the preparer for a
closing conference. If the case is
unagreed, the group manager or a
manager in a local POD will be
requested to attend the closing
conference;
-
Additional assignments for the
specialist may include:
-
Conducting and documenting
interviews with noncompliant
preparers to discuss problem areas
in an effort to curb future
noncompliance by the return
preparer;
-
Referring information on return
preparers suspected of involvement
in questionable practices to the
RPC. This information will be
obtained by working with tax
auditors and revenue agents.
20.1.6.1.2 (07-08-1999)
Examination Guidelines
-
Examiners will determine if return
preparer violations exist. This
determination will be made for every
examination and recorded on Form 4318
or 4700-A, Examination Workpapers. The
examiner will only open a preparer
penalty case when sanctions against
the preparer are warranted. When facts
and circumstances in the examination
do not give rise to development of the
preparer penalty issue, a simple
statement to that effect in the
workpapers is sufficient.
- During
the income tax examination, all
discussions relating to return
preparer penalties with either the
taxpayer or return preparer will be
limited to the development of facts to
determine the applicability of a
penalty. Penalties under IRC sections
6694 and 6695 will not be proposed in
the presence of the taxpayer.
- A
determination on the preparer penalty
case is conducted independently of,
and without regard to, the
determination on the income tax case.
The tax case has bearing on the
preparer penalty case only insofar as
assertion of the penalty requires an
understatement of tax.
-
Generally, no return preparer penalty
will be proposed until the income tax
examination is completed at the group
level. However, if the preparer case
is inseparable from the income tax
examination, both cases may be
completed simultaneously. The examiner
may pursue the preparer penalty after
an unagreed income tax case is
submitted at the group level.
-
Examiners may initiate program action
consideration by a referral through
the group manager to the RPC.
-
Comments made by examiners proposing
or discussing penalties against return
preparers may not be appropriate when
a related criminal case is under
consideration against the taxpayer.
These cases should be discussed with
CI.
20.1.6.1.3 (07-08-1999)
Appeal Rights
-
Relating to IRC sections 6700 and
6701:
The person/preparer/promoter may
appeal the area's or service center's
denial of a claim for refund.
Administrative appeal rights will be
granted by the area or service center
examiner when the basis for the claim
does not conflict with section
601.106(b) of the Statement of
Procedural Rules. An appeal should not
be based on moral, political,
constitutional, religious, or similar
arguments. If the claim is denied on
appeal and the Service assesses a
penalty and issues a notice and
demand:
-
The person may suspend collection
activity by paying at least 15
percent of the penalty and filing
a claim for refund within 30 days
after the date of notice and
demand.
-
However, the person must then
bring suit in Federal District
Court within 30 days of receiving
a Notice of Claim Disallowance, or
30 days after the expiration of
six months from the filing of the
claim, whichever is earlier; or
-
The person may bring a refund suit
in either the U.S. Court of
Federal Claims or a district court
within two years of the date of
denial of the claim or upon the
expiration of six months after the
date of filing the claim, if the
penalty has been paid in full.
-
Relating to IRC sections 6694 and
6695:
-
Unagreed Cases.
Examination procedures provide
that an unagreed income tax return
preparer penalty case under IRC
section 6694 or 6695 will not be
sent to Appeals before the related
unagreed income tax case is
submitted to Appeals. If the two
cases are submitted separately,
Examination will include in the
preparer case file information on
the current status and location of
the unagreed deficiency.
-
Relationship to
Deficiency Procedures.
IRC section 6696(b) indicates that
deficiency procedures do not apply
to IRC sections 6694 and 6695
penalties. However, Treas. Reg.
1.6694–4(a)(1) allows a
preassessment appeals procedure.
Examination sends the preparer a
30-day letter, L–1125(DO),
providing information on appeal
rights. If there is no timely
response to the letter, the
penalty is assessed. (See
Publication 5, Appeal Rights and
Preparation of Protests for
Unagreed Cases, for appeal
procedures.) If the preparer
requests preassessment Appeals
consideration, the request will be
granted for penalties under IRC
sections 6694 and 6695(b).
Although the regulation only
relates to the IRC section 6694
penalty, area and service center
examiners will follow the same
guidelines for IRC section 6695
penalties. With the exception of
subsection 6695(f), all IRC
section 6695 penalties will have
post-assessment penalty appeal
procedures only. Post-assessment
appeal rights will also be given
for penalties under IRC section
6713.
-
Short Statute.
If the statutory period for assessment
of the IRC section 6694(a) penalty is
about to expire and the preparer will
not agree to an extension, the Area
Director will assess the penalty. The
preparer, upon request, will be
provided postassessment appeal rights
in the same way preassessment appeal
rights would have been provided.
-
Examiners will not submit preparer
penalty cases to Appeals if less
than 180 days remain on the
statute of limitations. In these
instances examiners will first
solicit an extension of the
statutory period for assessment.
-
Unagreed return preparer cases
will not be submitted before the
related unagreed income tax case
is submitted, or the related
agreed income tax case is closed
from the examination group.
20.1.6.1.4 (07-08-1999)
Claims
- IRC
sections 6700 and 6701.
-
IRC section 6703 provides special
claim procedures for persons
assessed penalties under the above
IRC sections. Within 30 days from
the date the penalty is assessed,
the preparer may pay 15 percent of
the penalty and file Form 843,
Claim.
- If
both conditions specified in (a)
above are met, collection action
and the running of the statute of
limitation on collection are
suspended until the claim is
finally resolved administratively
or judicially, i.e., by Appeals or
by the Federal District Court. The
term "final resolution" generally
refers to the decision of the
district court.
- If
the preparer does not meet the
conditions in (a) above, he can
make a claim by paying the penalty
in full and filing a Form 6118,
Claim of Income Tax Return
Preparers. The preparer has three
years from the date of payment to
file a claim under this procedure.
Treas. Reg. 1.6696–1(g).
-
IRC section 6703 claims must be
processed on an expedite basis,
especially when Appeals
consideration is warranted and
will be granted.
- In
any proceeding involving the issue
of the liability for the penalty
under IRC sections 6700 and 6701,
the burden of proof is on the
government and deficiency
procedures do not apply. IRC
section 6703.
-
The U.S. may counterclaim for the
balance of the penalty under IRC
sections 6700 or 6701 when the
taxpayer has utilized the 15
percent rule in accordance with
IRC section 6703.
- IRC
sections 6694 and 6695.
-
IRC section 6696(c) and Treas.
Reg. 1.6696–1(b) authorize the
filing of claims for credit or
refund on any penalties paid under
IRC sections 6694 and 6695.
-
Form 6118, Claim of Income Tax
Return Preparers, is used by
preparers to submit claims under
IRC section 6696(c).
-
The statute of limitations for
filing a claim for refund of
penalties under IRC sections 6694
or 6695 is three years from the
date of full payment unless there
is a final administrative or
judicial action that there was no
understatement.
-
IRC section 6694(a) and (b) claims
(penalty assessed and paid in
full) and requests for abatement
(penalty assessed but not paid in
full) will be sent to and
controlled by the service center
RPC.
-
Collection function is restricted
to abatements on IRC section
6695(a) (b) and (c). Abatements
will be subject to routine
managerial review.
-
Special rule for IRC section 6694.
- A
claim for refund of penalties
under IRC section 6694 may follow
IRC section 6694(c) and Treas.
Regs. 1.6694–4. Within 30 days
after the date of notice and
demand for payment, the preparer
may pay 15 percent of the penalty
and timely file a claim for refund
(Form–6118).
-
Using the procedure described in
subparagraph IRC section
6694(c)(1), collection of the
remaining portion of the penalty
will be suspended until the
earlier of: 1.) 30 days after the
refund claim is denied, or 2.) 30
days from the period ending six
months after the preparer files
the claim.
- If
the preparer begins a proceeding
in a United States District Court
for the determination of the
penalty during either of these 30
day periods, collection of the
penalty will continue to be
suspended until the final
resolution of the proceeding.
- Claims
filed on the area level should be
forwarded to the service center for
processing.
20.1.6.1.5 (07-08-1999)
Service Center Claim Processing
- Claims
filed at the service center will be
identified and forwarded to the
appropriate function. The Chief,
Compliance Division (CCD) will
determine which service center
function within the territory screens
and evaluates claims.
20.1.6.1.6 (07-08-1999)
Program Action Cases
- A
Program Action Case is the examination
of returns prepared by one preparer
when information indicates a pattern
of noncompliance with the preparer
provisions of the Internal Revenue
Code. Only the Area Director has the
authority to approve program action.
- The
Return Preparer Coordinator (RPC) in
each area will maintain files
containing information on return
preparer activity and related Service
actions. The RPC will review these
files monthly. Those which contain
information indicating a pattern of
noncompliance will be considered for
program action.
- These
files will contain:
-
Copies of Form 5808, Return
Preparer Penalty Follow-Up;
-
Various information received from
the Service Center, Examination,
Collection, and other sources;
-
Copies of Form 5809, Preparer
Penalty Case Control Card,
reflecting penalties previously
asserted against preparers and
penalties pending assertion;
-
Information on representative
by-pass actions; and
-
Information forwarded through the
group manager on examiners'
recommendations for program action
or no program action.
- The
RPC completes Form 5029, Return
Preparer's Inventory List Order, and
forwards it to the designated service
center contact for processing. The
Preparer's Inventory Listing (PIL)
identifies all the individual returns
prepared by the subject preparer,
giving the taxpayer name code, SSN,
Document Locator Number, and partial
return data (e.g., adjusted gross
income, taxable income, tax per
return, Schedule C/F net income/loss,
contributions, and refund amount).
- The
Preparer Volume Listing (PVL) is a
list of the total number of individual
returns prepared by a given preparer
and is generated automatically on a
monthly basis. The RPC will also
review this data as part of program
action considerations.
- From
this listing, the RPC will requisition
an appropriate sample of returns
prepared by the subject preparer. The
RPC will screen these returns to
determine if they appear to warrant
examination.
- If,
after these steps, the RPC determines
that program action should be
initiated, a summary of all facts
indicating the advisability of such
action will be prepared and presented
to the Penalty Screening Committee
(PSC). The PSC will carefully consider
all relevant information to ensure
that there is strong evidence of a
preparer's alleged negligence,
intentional disregard of rules or
regulations, unrealistic position, or
patterns of willful understatement,
before seeking approval to initiate
program action. Program action will be
limited to abusive cases where
information indicates that a return
preparer has engaged in a widespread
practice of making material errors
which demonstrates intentional
misconduct or clear incompetence in
preparing income tax returns. If there
is no PSC, the RPC will make the
decision to initiate a request for
program action.
- The
PSC/RPC will forward a written request
for approval to initiate program
action through the Field Territory
Manager to the Area Director.
-
The request will state the number
of returns in the sample to be
examined. The Area Director will
make the final determination, in
writing, to approve or disapprove
the request for program action.
- If
approved, the sample returns will
be secured and examined. Based on
the results of these examinations,
the Area Director will determine
whether additional actions are
warranted. Under no circumstance
will a sample of returns be
examined without the written
approval of the Area Director.
-
Returns selected for examination under
a program action will be clearly
identified as "Return Preparer Program
Action Cases" and the case file will
include all information provided by
the RPC. These cases will be assigned
to the appropriate examination group
by the RPC.
-
The RPC will establish AIMS
controls on those cases selected
for examination and will be
responsible for the disposition of
non-selected returns.
-
All returns including related,
prior and subsequent years, will
be established using Source Code
49 and the appropriate local
project code.
-
Examiners should become familiar
with the practitioner's method of
operation so that they may use
their time most effectively.
Information provided by the RPC
should be helpful preparation.
-
Examiners should follow
established procedures and
standards in considering whether
to assert the negligence penalty
under IRC section 6653(a) or the
accuracy penalties under IRC
section 6662 in relation to
program action returns.
-
Program action is selectively designed
to concentrate enforcement activity on
preparers who represent habitual
noncompliance and lack of competence.
Projected audit results are part of,
but not the sole deciding factor for,
program action.
- Each
area should develop a follow-up system
on preparers where penalties,
suspension of filing privileges,
and/or injunctive actions were
undertaken.
-
Returns prepared in subsequent
years by these preparers may be
evaluated and selected for
examination on a sample basis in
order to determine the extent of
continued compliance or
noncompliance.
-
Areas may find it beneficial to
use multifunctional site
visitation teams to determine
compliance of return preparers
identified as preparing abusive
returns in prior years.
Information obtained by the team
may be used to initiate program
action on the preparer.
20.1.6.1.7 (07-08-1999)
Affidavits
- An
affidavit is a person's written
declaration or statement of facts
voluntarily made and confirmed by oath
or affirmation before a person with
authority for administering it. It is
taken from any person having knowledge
of facts and circumstances relating to
a violation of law in order to
document and validate the position of
the Service in applying sanctions.
Affidavits relating to the return
preparer program will usually be taken
from the taxpayer.
-
Affidavits are not used routinely in
return preparer cases; however,
affidavits should be completed in all
cases for which the Service may ask
the Justice Department to seek an
injunction. The affidavit will
facilitate the filing of a suit,
obtaining a preliminary injunction,
and an early hearing.
- The
following items should be identified
and incorporated in the affidavit:
-
The judicial district involved.
-
The name, SSN, business and home
address, and business and home
telephone number of the witness.
-
Persons present during the
interview and their relation to
the investigation.
-
Date, time, and place of the
interview.
-
Tax years involved.
-
Specific portions of the return
that are false or fabricated, if
any.
- The
affidavit should include other
relevant information pertaining to the
preparer, such as:
-
Actions taken by the preparer when
informed of the client's
examination (e.g., preparer
offered to supply false documents
to support false deductions, the
preparer told the client to ignore
the IRS, etc.)
-
Experience of the preparer in
preparing returns.
-
Education of the preparer.
-
Where the preparer is or was
working.
-
How the preparer solicits clients
and whether the preparer is
soliciting clients now.
- The
examiner should make the following
determinations and also include them
in the affidavit:
-
How and when the taxpayer met the
person under investigation.
-
The specific information that the
taxpayer provided to the person
under investigation, and how and
when that information was given.
-
Whether the taxpayer signed the
return, has seen the return, was
provided a copy of the return and
had the return explained to him or
her.
- If
the person under investigation was
paid and how the amount of
remuneration was determined (e.g.,
a set fee, percent of the refund,
etc.).
-
How the fee was paid (e.g., cash,
check, money order, barter, etc).
-
When the fee was paid (e.g., when
the information was provided,
after the return was completed,
after the refund was received,
etc.)
-
Whether the taxpayer asked the
preparer to put false items on the
return.
- Form
2311, Affidavit, can be used for this
purpose.
20.1.6.1.8 (07-08-1999)
Statute of Limitations
- The
statute of limitations on assessment
for IRC sections 6694(a) and 6695,
expires three years from the later of
the due date of the related return or
the date the return was filed. There
is no statute of limitations on
assessment for IRC sections 6694(b),
6700, and 6701 penalties. There is no
statute of limitations on actions to
enjoin preparers or promoters under
IRC section 7407 or 7408.
-
CAUTION: Extending
the statute (Form 872) on a taxpayer's
return does not extend the statute for
the return preparer penalty case.
- The
statute on a return preparer penalty
case under IRC sections 6694(a) and
6695 can be extended using Form 872–D,
Consent to Extend the Time on
Assessment of a Tax Return Preparer
Penalty. (See Rev. Rul. 78–245.)
- A
transcript of the return on which the
preparer penalty is based should be
included in the preparer penalty case
file for accurate monitoring of the
expiration date.
-
Consents should be obtained, except
for 6694(b) cases, when the statute of
limitations for assessing the preparer
penalty will expire within 180 days
and there is insufficient time to
complete the examination. Also, the
statute for assessment must be
extended if the preparer requests to
go to Appeals and there is less than
180 days remaining on the statute for
assessment. Ample time for processing
is important because statutory notice
of deficiency procedures do not apply
to preparer penalties.
- A
separate consent should generally be
obtained for each year under
consideration, but related taxpayers'
returns for which the penalties are
applicable can be included on each
consent.
20.1.6.1.9 (07-08-1999)
Definitions
-
Adequate Disclosure.
Disclosure made on a Form 8275 or
8275–R, as appropriate, or made in
accordance with the annual revenue
procedure issued for the purposes of
the substantial understatement
penalty. A preparer is not subject to
a civil conduct penalty for an
unrealistic position under IRC section
6694(a) if the position is not
frivolous and is adequately disclosed.
Different disclosure rules apply to
signing and nonsigning preparers (see
Treas. Regs. 1.6694–2(c)(3)(i) and
(ii), and 1.6694–3(e)(1) and (2)).
-
Frivolous Position.
A position that is patently improper.
See Treas. Reg. 1.6694–2(c)(2).
-
Gross Valuation Overstatement.
A gross valuation overstatement is a
statement of the value of any property
or service that exceeds 200 percent of
the amount determined to be the
correct value, when the value of the
property or services is directly
related to the amount of any allowable
deduction or credit. (See Mattingly v.
United States, 722 F. Supp. 568 (E.D.
Mo. 1989).)
- If
a promoter provides a gross
valuation overstatement in
connection with the organization
or sale of an interest in the
entity, the penalty applies
regardless of whether the promoter
knows or has reason to know of the
overvaluation.
-
The gross valuation overstatement
must be directly related to a
material matter.
-
Reasonable Basis/Good Faith
Exception. When a penalty under
IRC section 6700 is based on the
promoter's making or furnishing of
a gross valuation overstatement,
the Service may waive the penalty
if the valuation had a reasonable
basis and was made in good faith.
This exception does not apply to
penalties based on the making or
furnishing of a false or
fraudulent statement as to the tax
benefits to be derived from
participating in the arrangement.
-
Income Tax Return Preparer.
Any person (including a partnership or
corporation) who prepares for
compensation all or a substantial
portion of a tax return or claim for
refund under the income tax provisions
of the Code. For a more complete
discussion of the meaning of this
term, see IRM 20.1.6.3. The IRC
section 7701(a)(36) definition of a
tax return preparer has been
interpreted by Treas. Reg. 301.7701–15
and various revenue rulings to include
persons (including "nonsigning
preparers" ) who:
-
Furnish sufficient advice or
information so that the completion
of the return by another
individual is a mechanical
process;
-
Supply computerized tax return
preparation service to tax
practitioners, or offers a service
or program that makes substantive
tax determinations; and
-
Software companies or other
persons that prepare computer
programs and sell them to
taxpayers for use in preparing
their returns, may also be an
income tax return preparers for
purposes of the civil conduct
penalties.
-
Excepted from this definition are
persons who provide mere clerical
services, employees who prepare
returns for their employers,
preparers of fiduciary returns, as
well as those who prepare a claim
for refund for a taxpayer in
response to a deficiency notice or
a consent to extend the period of
assessment after the audit of a
taxpayer has begun.
-
For the purposes of the IRC
section 6694(a) or (b) penalties,
the "return preparer" definition
was modified in 1991 so that only
one individual associated with a
firm (i.e., an employee or
partner) is treated as a preparer
( "one-preparer-per-firm" rule).
See Treas. Reg. 1.6694–1(b)(1).
- A
nonsigning preparer who prepares a
schedule or entry that constitutes
a substantial portion of the
return may be considered a tax
return preparer. In making the
decision as to what constitutes a
"substantial portion," the
examiner should consider the
relation of the entry or schedule
to the tax liability, the
complexity of the return as a
whole, and the relative time
involved in preparing it.
- An
electronic return originator may
be a return preparer under IRC
section 7701(a)36 and Treas. Regs.
301.7701–15, who could be liable
for these penalties. However, an
electronic filer who is primarily
a transmitter with services
limited to "typing, reproduction
or other mechanical assistance in
the preparation of a return or
claim for refund" is not an income
tax preparer for purposes for
these penalties. See Rev. Proc.
91–69, 1991–2 C.B. 893.
-
Penalty Screening Committee.
A multifunctional group that is
established by the Area Director. The
committee members are the Electronic
Filer Coordinator, Return Preparer
Coordinator and a Criminal
Investigations representative. This
committee identifies patterns of
preparer abuse, recommends the
initiation of a project on potentially
abusive return preparers, and reviews
the appropriateness and accuracy of
the return preparer penalty assertion.
-
Promoter.
A promoter is any person who
organizes, assists in the organization
of, or participates (directly or
indirectly) in the sale of any
interest in a partnership or other
entity, investment plan or
arrangement, or plan or other
arrangement. The class of persons
covered by the penalty includes not
only sellers, but also individuals
who:
-
Aid or assist sellers,
-
Cause other persons to make or
furnish the proscribed statements,
or
-
cause an appraiser to grossly
overvalue property.
-
IRC section 6700.
This code section applies broadly to:
-
Promoters, organizers, sales
persons, appraisers, engineers,
accountants, attorneys,
commodities future dealers of tax
straddles, financial advisors, and
any persons who actively
participate in the promotion of a
tax shelter;
-
Promoters and sellers of mail
order ministries, family trust
arrangements, tax evasion schemes,
offshore tax shelters, and tax
havens;
-
Investment bankers, bond counsel,
feasibility consultants,
engineers, etc., in relation to
plans or arrangements that may
include obligations issued by a
state or local government but need
not be investment oriented.
-
Reason to Know Standard.
The penalty for making a statement
with respect to the allow ability of
any deduction or credit, the
excludability of any income, or the
securing of any tax benefit only
applies when the individual "knows or
has reason to know" that the statement
is false or fraudulent. Whether a
person knows or has reason to know
that a statement is false or
fraudulent depends upon his role in
the organization or sale.
- An
attorney would generally be
entitled to rely on feasibility
studies conducted by a reputable
engineering firm, unless such
attorney knew or had reason to
know of information which would
call that study into question.
Absent that, the attorney would
not normally be required to
question the assumptions
underlying, or results reached by
the study.
-
Similarly, as to matters of fact
or expectation, attorneys can rely
on information provided by other
parties, absent actual knowledge
or reason to know of its
inaccuracy. However, attorneys
cannot rely on statements which
are not credible or reasonable on
their face.
-
The "reason to know" standard does
not carry with it a duty of
inquiry, unless the person
involved with the promotion has
reason to know of the inaccuracy
of facts provided by another
person.
-
Examiners may rely on objective
evidence in determining whether a
person involved with the promotion
has "reason to know" that a
statement is false or fraudulent.
A promoter's ignorance of facts
revealed in the materials provided
to him is not a legitimate defense
if the knowledge is required by
his/her role in the transaction.
-
Reasonable Cause/Good Faith.
A common sense allowance under the
circumstances for omissions or errors.
The IRC section 6694(a) penalty will
not be imposed if, considering all the
facts and circumstances, it is
determined that the preparer had
reasonable cause and acted in good
faith. Factors to consider in making
this determination include the nature
of the error, the materiality of the
error, the frequency of the error, the
preparer's normal office practice, and
the preparer's reliance upon the
advice of another preparer. (See IRM
20.1.1, Reasonable Cause Guidelines.)
-
Reckless or Intentional Disregard.
In general, a preparer is considered
to have recklessly or intentionally
disregarded a rule or regulation if
the preparer takes a position on the
return or claim that is contrary to a
rule or regulation and the preparer
knows of, or is reckless in not
knowing of, the rule or regulation.
- A
preparer who makes little or no
effort to determine if a rule or
regulation exists may be subject
to the IRC section 6694(b) penalty
if such conduct deviates from a
"reasonable" preparer standard.
Diligence is implicitly a part of
the standard for a reasonable
preparer.
- An
IRC section 6694(b) penalty
predicated on reckless or
intentional disregard would not be
imposed if there is adequate
disclosure of a nonfrivolous
position and, in the case of a
regulation, the position
represents a good faith challenge
to the regulation's validity.
-
Prior to January 1, 1990, reckless
or intentional disregard of a rule
or regulation was addressed by an
IRC section 6694(a) penalty of
$100. OBRA '89 repositioned this
conduct to IRC section 6694(b) and
made it a $1,000 penalty.
-
Rules and Regulations.
The provisions of the Internal Revenue
Code, temporary or final regulations,
revenue rulings, or notices (other
than notices of proposed rule making)
that are published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin. Revenue procedures
are not included in this definition.
-
Understatement of Liability.
Any understatement of the net amount
payable with respect to any tax due
under Subtitle A of the Code (income
taxes) or any overstatement of the net
amount creditable or refundable with
respect to any such tax may subject a
preparer to the IRC section 6694
penalty.
- A
final administrative or judicial
determination concerning the
taxpayer's return is not required
in order to assert the preparer
conduct penalties. However, the
conduct penalties should be abated
if a subsequent judicial or
administrative determination
concludes that no understatement
exists.
-
For purposes of the civil preparer
conduct penalties, the "net amount
payable" is not reduced by any
carryback.
-
For further guidance on the
meaning of this term, see IRM
20.1.6.3.1 and 20.1.6.3.2, below.
-
Unrealistic Position.
A position for which there was not a
realistic possibility of being
sustained on its merits.
- A
position has a realistic
possibility of being sustained if
a reasonable and well-informed
analysis by a person knowledgeable
in tax law would lead such a
person to conclude that the
position has approximately a
one-in-three, or greater,
likelihood of being sustained.
- In
the case of signing preparers, the
relevant date for determining
realistic possibility is generally
the date the preparer dates the
return. The relevant date for
nonsigning preparers is contained
in Treas. Reg. 1.6694–2(b)(5)(ii).
-
The analysis used for determining
whether substantial authority is
present for purposes of the
accuracy-related penalty also
applies in making a determination
concerning the realistic
possibility standard. Only the
authorities specified in Treas.
Reg. 1.6662–4(d)(3)(iii) are
considered. Also, see Examples
(1), (2), (3) and (5) in IRM
20.1.6.3.7, below.
-
Willful Conduct.Knowing
and intentional conduct. A preparer is
considered to have acted willfully if
he disregards information provided (or
adds information not provided)
furnished by the taxpayer or other
persons in an attempt to wrongfully
reduce tax. It is not necessary to
prove that the preparer acted with a
bad purpose or evil motive in order to
establish willfulness.
20.1.6.1.10 (07-08-1999)
Processing and Assessment
Instructions
- Return
preparer penalties are assessed or
abated on the Master File Civil
Penalty Module using MFT 55.
- These
procedures allow tracking of return
preparer penalty assessments or
abatements. The information must be
input completely and correctly for
data on the Return Preparer Penalty
Program to be accurate.
20.1.6.1.10.1 (07-08-1999)
Responsibilities
-
Examiners will attach Form 3198,
Special Handling Notice, to each
penalty case file, identifying it as
a return preparer penalty case and
referencing the applicable IRC
section.
- The
originator, in completing Form 8278,
Computation and Assessment of
Miscellaneous Penalties, will enter
in red and initial:
-
The applicable date of the
expiration of the statute of
limitations on assessment in
Item 6 (or, if applicable, enter
"No Statute" in Item 4), and
-
The date Form 8278 was completed
by the originator in Item 9 or
11.
- When
the same penalties for the same
period apply to a preparer in
relation to more than one return,
and the statute of limitations on
the preparer penalty is determined
by the statute of limitations for
the return, complete Form 8278 using
the earliest statute of limitations
date. (See IRM 20.1.6.1.8, Statute
of Limitations.)
- When
more than one penalty under
different IRC sections will be
assessed against the same preparer
for the same period, a separate Form
8278 has to be completed for each
penalty.
20.1.6.1.10.2 (07-08-1999)
Processing Guidelines
- IRC
sections and reference numbers for
return preparer penalties on the
Civil Penalty Module are contained
in Exhibit 20.1.6–4.
-
These penalties will be
transmitted on Form 8278. The
assessments and abatements will
be input to Master File (MF)
through IDRS using Command Code
ADJ54, Transaction Code (TC) 290
with a zero amount, the
appropriate three digit
reference number, and the amount
of the penalty. Reference
numbers must be input correctly
in all instances in order to
track related data.
-
An assessment generates a TC 240
and an abatement generates a TC
241 to the MF with the
respective reference number of
the penalty adjustment. TC 290
is only a carrier transaction
and will not post to MF. The
reference numbers generate a
notice to the preparer which
explains the assessment and
appeal rights.
-
NOTE: The
return preparer penalty account is
not established or controlled on
AIMS.
-
Imminent statute cases will be
processed under quick assessment
procedures.
- The
following guidelines are used in
establishing name lines:
-
Establishment of a civil penalty
name line (CVPN) only applies to
MFT 55 assessments. Information
to otherwise update the entity,
such as an address change, must
be input prior to establishing
the CVPN.
-
A hard copy MFTRA will be
requested for all preparer
penalty cases (complete entity
and all active modules).
-
If the MF name line of the
preparer being assessed is joint
or ever has been, a CVPN must be
established using Form 2363, TC
013, RF 55, (RF 55 informs the
terminal operator that only a
preparer penalty name line is
being established or changed).
DO NOT
change the name line of the MFT
30 account.
-
If the name line is single, the
special action to establish the
CVPN is not warranted. The
preparer penalty may be assessed
directly. MF will automatically
extract and establish the
penalty name line.
-
If the MFTRA shows no record,
then a MF entity must be
established using Form 2363, TC
000 (with a "mail file
requirement" of "1" for MFT 55),
for the year of the penalty
assessment. Input the preparer's
complete name and address. This
allows the penalty to be
assessed.
-
If a penalty is to be asserted
for a year prior to when the
preparer has filed a return, a
MF name line must be established
for the year the penalty is to
be assessed using Form 2363, TC
013. The penalty may then be
assessed. MF will automatically
extract and establish the
penalty name line.
-
Underline the following entries on
Form 8278 in brown pencil to
facilitate pick up by the remote
terminal operators:
-
Taxpayer's name control,
-
Taxpayer's Identification Number
(TIN),
-
MFT Code,
-
Taxable Period,
-
Transaction Code,
-
Reference number,
-
Complete the cents column with
numbers only (no dash "—" mark
is permitted,) and
-
Statute date if notated.
- A
separate Form 8278 has to be
completed for each penalty asserted
under different IRC sections if more
than one applies to the same
preparer for the same period. If
this instruction in IRM
20.1.6.1.10.1 above has not been
observed, return the case file to
the originator for completion. When
multiple penalties apply to the same
preparer for the same period:
-
Input the first penalty to be
assessed using blocking series
52X,
-
Input subsequent penalties using
blocking series 53X,
-
Annotate Form 8278 with correct
blocking series opposite each
penalty to facilitate terminal
input, and
-
With blocking series 53X, CP
Notice 55 will be generated to
alert the service center to
associate Forms 5147, IDRS
Transaction Record, for
subsequent penalty assessments
with the penalty case file
containing the input and source
documents.
-
After terminal input, all preparer
penalty case files with Form 8278
will be forwarded to service center
files function to be associated with
Form 5147, IDRS Transaction Record.
20.1.6.1.11 (07-08-1999)
Electronic Filing Program
-
Preparers in the Electronic Filing
Program (EFP) must meet suitability
standards reflected in Rev. Proc.
91–69, 1991–2 C.B. 893. Since
penalties asserted against preparers
are a factor in determining
suitability for the EFP, Return
Preparer Coordinators will notify
Electronic Filing Coordinators (EFC)
of all penalties asserted on return
preparers.
-
Section 120.1.6.03 of Rev. Proc. 91–69
broadly defines the applicability of
return preparer penalties for those
participating in the EFP: ". . .the
Service reserves the right to assert
all appropriate preparer, nonpreparer,
and disclosure penalties against an
Electronic Filer as warranted under
the circumstances."
- Area
Offices are required to establish
multifunctional teams to visit
electronic filers to determine their
compliance with the ELF revenue
procedures. Examiners who participate
on these teams charge their time to
activity code 522500.
20.1.6.1.12 (05-05-2000)
Third Party Contacts—IRC Section
7602(c)
- RRA 98
created IRC section 7602(c) to require
that before Service employees initiate
contact with third parties for the
determination or collection of a
taxpayer's tax liability, the taxpayer
must be given reasonable notice in
advance that third parties may be
contacted. Section 7602(c) also
requires the Service to make a record
of persons contacted and provide that
record to the taxpayer both
periodically and upon the taxpayer's
request. See IRM 5.1.17 for general
Examination procedures on third party
contacts. In certain situations the
notice and recordkeeping requirements
of IRC section 7602(c) may apply to
contacts made to determine the
applicability of return preparer
penalties because these penalties are
treated as a tax under IRC section
6671. The applicability of IRC section
7602(c) is indicated below with
reference to the preparer penalty Code
provisions.
-
IRC sections 6695 (a)
and (f).
In the course of a routine
examination, mandatory pro forma
inquiries addressed to the taxpayer
regarding the preparer's compliance
with IRC sections 6695(a) and (f) are
not third party contacts.
-
The notice requirements of IRC
section 7602(c) are not
immediately triggered if the
taxpayer's response to pro forma
questions asked as part of a
routine audit provides a basis for
conducting a preparer penalty
investigation.
- If
the taxpayer indicates that the
preparer did not provide a copy of
the return and/or the preparer
negotiated the refund check,
examiners should briefly confirm
and record the response,
discontinue inquiry on the issue,
and continue with the examination
of the return. Contact the
preparer to determine if IRC
section 6695(a) and/or (f)
penalties apply. If further
contact with the taxpayer
regarding the determination of a
preparer penalty is necessary,
issue Letter 3164N (AO) to the
preparer before re-contacting the
taxpayer. Notification is now
required since contact with the
taxpayer is a third party contact
with respect to a determination
the preparer's liability for a
penalty.
-
IRC section 6695(g).
Compliance visits with preparers to
determine the due diligence
requirement for the earned income
credit are not third party contacts.
-
IRC section 6694.
In the course of routine examinations,
the preparer penalty issue under IRC
section 6694 is
usually not subject to
third party notification and
recordkeeping requirements.
-
Criteria for applying the IRC
section 6694 penalty—unrealistic
positions, willful attempts to
understate the liability, reckless
or intentional disregard of rules
and regulations—are decided by 1)
the character of the adjusted
return positions and 2) the
preparer's part in the
noncompliance.
-
Information on the applicability
of preparer penalties is often a
by-product of the examination and
does not always require examiners
to directly address the taxpayer
as a third party for information
on the preparer's conduct. The
notice requirements of IRC section
7602(c) are not immediately
triggered by a taxpayer's response
that provides a basis for
conducting a preparer penalty
investigation. For example, in
order to account for an erroneous
return position and determine if
an IRC section 6662 penalty
applies against the taxpayer, the
examiner may ask the taxpayer what
information he gave the preparer
and to what extent the preparer
was informed of all relevant,
underlying facts.
-
Information from the taxpayer in
response to a proposed IRC section
6662 penalty may indicate that the
"advice exception" applies. (See
Treas. Reg. 1.6664–4(c) and IRM
20.1.5.6.2.) Any contact with the
preparer to determine the
applicability of the taxpayer's
penalty is a third party contact.
Mail Letter 3164 N (AO) to the
taxpayer prior to any additional
contacts with the preparer and
record the contact on Form 12175.
-
The notice and recordkeeping
requirements come into effect
whenever the examiner addresses
the taxpayer as a third party,
i.e., whenever the examiner
directly asks the taxpayer for
information needed for making a
determination on the preparer's
liability for a penalty. Before an
inquiry of that character is
initiated, the examiner must issue
Letter 3164 N (AO) to the preparer
and then re-contact the taxpayer.
Record the contact on Form 12175.
-
Program action.
Examination contacts with program
action taxpayers are considered third
party contacts for the purpose of
making a penalty determination in the
related preparer. Letter 3164 N (AO)
must be issued to the preparer after
the return preparer project is
approved and before the related
taxpayers are first contacted for
examinations. (See IRM 20.1.6.1.6 for
program action guidelines and (10)
below.) Contacts with each related
taxpayer must be documented on Form
12175.
-
Criminal investigations.
-
Examiners may conduct audits of
program action taxpayers
(following procedures in (5)
above) regarding civil issues at
the same time that special agents
are independently conducting a
criminal investigation of the
related preparer.
-
The "pending criminal
investigation" exception under IRC
7602(c)(3)(C) applies to third
party contacts made by special
agents in CI. It also applies to
examiners or other Service
personnel while working under CI
and assisting in a criminal
investigation.
-
IRC sections 6700 and
6701.
Contact with third parties for the
purpose of 1) investigating persons
described in IRC section 6700(a)(1) or
(2) who may be subject to the tax
shelter promoter penalty, and 2)
investigating IRC section 6701
penalties on aiding and abetting the
understatement of a tax liability are
third party contacts and are subject
to IRC section 7602(c) requirements.
As such, Letter 3164 N (AO) must be
issued and each contact must be
documented on Form 12175.
-
IRC section 6713.
A violation with respect to the
prohibition on a preparer's disclosure
of tax return information is almost
always brought to the attention of the
Service by the affected taxpayer. The
unsolicited receipt of information
from a third party is not initiated by
the IRS and is not subject to IRC
section 7602(c) notification or
reporting requirements.
-
IRC section 7407 and
7408.
Actions to enjoin income tax return
preparers and to enjoin promoters of
abusive tax shelters, etc., are legal
proceedings to prohibit certain
conduct and are not to determine or
collect tax liabilities. Therefore,
IRC section 7602(c) does not apply to
the action to enjoin nor to referrals
by examiners to Area Counsel or the
Department of Justice. However, the
underlying investigative actions
requiring third party contacts, such
as contacts under (2), (4), (5), (6),
and (7), are subject to IRC section
7602(c) requirements.
-
General considerations.
-
Mail Letter 3164 N (AO) to the
address of record on the
Individual or Business Master
File. If Letter 3164 N (AO) is
returned undeliverable and a
correct current address is
located, update the Master File to
reflect the correct address and
reissue Letter 3164 N (AO)
accordingly.
-
Wait ten calendar days after
issuing Letter 3164 N (AO) before
contacting the third party.
-
Letter 3164 N (AO) may be issued
in person. In these cases, the
third party contacts may be made
immediately.
20.1.6.2
(07-08-1999)
Director of Practice
- The
Office of the Director of Practice is
responsible for overseeing:
- The
rules governing practitioners (i.e.,
attorneys, certified public
accountants, enrolled agents,
enrolled actuaries, and other
persons representing clients before
the Service), and
- The
rules relating to authority to
practice before the Service, and the
duties, restrictions, and
disciplinary action that pertain to
such practice.
- The
Director of Practice also helps ensure
the cooperation and integrity of the
practitioner community in the overall
field of tax administration.
20.1.6.2.1 (07-08-1999)
Referral to the Director of Practice
- When
the following penalties are asserted
against a practitioner an information
referral to the Director of Practice
is mandatory:
-
IRC sections 6695(f), 6700, and
6701.
-
IRC sections 6694(a) and (b)
penalties when closed agreed by
the examiner or sustained in
Appeals, or closed unagreed
without Appeal contact.
-
IRC section 7407/7408 when action
is taken to enjoin preparers or
promoters.
-
IRC section 6701(a) asserted
against appraisers.
- A
referral is discretionary on penalties
asserted under IRC section 6695(a)
through (e)(2). Normally the referral
will be made if there are a number of
similar penalties asserted against the
same practitioner, since this could
indicate reckless conduct or lack of
competence.
-
Section 10.53 of Treasury Department
Circular No. 230 requires Service
employees to make a written report to
the Director of Practice when there is
reason to believe that a tax
practitioner has violated the rules
set forth in the Circular. When
disciplinary action is deemed
appropriate, the report will include
sufficient detail, documentation, and
exhibits, to substantiate the
character and extent of the violation.
-
Examiners will send referrals for
C–230 action to the Director of
Practice on Form 8484, Penalty
Information Report. It is routed
through Case Processing Support the
RPC who forwards it to the Area
Director. The referral will be
transmitted by memorandum explaining
the preparer's conduct, whether an
appeal will be made, and to what
extent the preparer normally practices
before the Service.
- If the
referral is for information and not
for C–230 action, examiners will route
F–8484 through QMS to the RPC who will
send it directly to the Director of
Practice.
-
Referrals should be sent to:
Office of the Director of Practice
C:AP:P
1111 Constitution Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20224
20.1.6.3
(07-08-1999)
Preparer Conduct Penalties: IRC
Section 6694
- The Tax
Reform Act of 1976 (TRA 1976) enacted
IRC section 6694 which gives the IRS the
authority to assess civil penalties
against income tax return preparers.
- As
enacted by TRA 1976, IRC section
6694(a) provided a $100 penalty for
preparers who understated a
taxpayer's income tax liability by
the negligent or intentional
disregard of rules or regulations.
- As
enacted by TRA 1976, IRC section
6694(b) provided a $500 penalty for
preparers who willfully understated
a taxpayer's income tax liability.
- The
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1989 (OBRA 1989) made the following
changes to IRC section 6694(a):
-
Increased the penalty amount from
$100 to $250 per return or claim for
refund.
-
Changed the standard for imposing
the penalty such that the penalty
now applies if the understatement of
liability is due to a position that
was known or that reasonably should
have been known by the preparer and
for which there was not a realistic
possibility of being sustained on
its merits.
-
Added a disclosure exception for
positions that are not frivolous.
-
Added a reasonable cause and good
faith exception.
-
Realistic possibility
standard: The
House Committee Report to OBRA 1989
states that the new realistic
possibility standard was adopted
because it generally reflects the
professional conduct standards
applicable to lawyers (American Bar
Association Ethics Opinion) and to
certified public accountants
(AICPA's Statement on
Responsibilities in Tax
Practice—SRTP No. 1). The Committee
also believed that this standard of
behavior was stricter than the prior
negligence standard, so that
negligent behavior subject to the
penalty under prior law would
continue to be subject to the
penalty under this new standard.
- OBRA
1989 made the following changes to IRC
section 6694(b):
-
Increased the penalty amount from
$500 to $1,000 per return or claim
for refund.
-
Added reckless or intentional
disregard of rules or regulations as
a basis for imposing the IRC section
6694(b) penalty.
- Made
intentional disregard of rules or
regulations (formerly under IRC
section 6694(a)) a basis for
imposing the higher IRC section
6694(b) penalty.
-
Indicated (in the legislative
history to OBRA 1989) that the IRC
section 6694(b) penalty for
disregarding rules or regulations
should not be imposed if proper
disclosure is made.
- The OBRA
1989 amendments apply to documents
prepared after 12/31/89.
- For
guidance on the new IRC section 6694
provisions, see the regulations issued
on December 31, 1991. For documents
prepared and advice given after December
31, 1989 but on or before December 31,
1991, also see Notice 90–20, 1990–1 C.B.
328.
20.1.6.3.1 (07-08-1999)
Returns and Claims for Refund
Prepared Prior to 1/1/90:
Definitions
-
Income tax return preparer.
IRC section 6694(f) cross references
to IRC section 7701(a)(36) for the
definition of an income tax return
preparer. Under IRC section
7701(a)(36), an income tax return
preparer means any person who prepares
for compensation, or who employs one
or more persons to prepare for
compensation, any income tax return or
claim for refund of income taxes. For
this purpose, the preparation of a
substantial portion of a return or
claim for refund is treated as if it
were the preparation of such return or
claim for refund.
-
Persons who are income tax return
preparers:
- A
person who does not physically
prepare an income tax return is
nevertheless an income tax return
preparer if that person furnishes
to a taxpayer or other preparer
sufficient information and advice
so that completion of the return
or claim for refund is largely a
mechanical or clerical matter.
(Treas. Reg. 301.7701–15(a)(1))
- A
preparer of a partnership return
or an S corporation return is an
income tax return preparer with
respect to a partner's or a
shareholder's return if the entry
or entries on the partnership or S
corporation return reportable on
the partner's or shareholder's
return constitute a substantial
portion of the partner's or
shareholder's return. (Treas. Reg.
301.7701–15(b)(3))
- A
firm that offers computerized tax
preparation service to tax
practitioners is an income tax
return preparer if the program
makes substantive tax
determinations. (Rev. Rul. 85–187,
1985–2 C.B. 338, Rev. Rul 85–188,
1985–2 C.B. 339; and Rev. Rul.
85–189, 1985–2 C.B. 339)
- A
person who prepares a computer
program and sells it to taxpayers
to use in preparing the taxpayers'
income tax returns is an income
tax return preparer if the program
provides substantive tax
instructions. (Rev. Rul. 85–189)
- A
general partner who prepares a
partnership return can be an
income tax return preparer with
respect to a limited partner's
return in certain situations.
(Rev. Rul. 81–270, 1981–2 C.B.
250)
- A
preparer (1st preparer) can be a
preparer with respect to a return
prepared by another preparer (2nd
preparer) if the 2nd preparer
relied on information contained on
the return prepared by the 1st
preparer. This occurs, for
example, when the 1st preparer
negligently overstates the
expenses on a prior year's return,
thus creating an NOL, and the 2nd
preparer, in good faith, applies
the NOL carryover in preparing the
subsequent year's return. (Rev.
Rul. 81–171, 1981–1 C.B. 581)
-
Persons who are
not
income tax return preparers:
- A
person who prepares a return or
claim for refund with no explicit
or implicit agreement for
compensation even though the
person receives a gift or return
service or favor. (Treas. Reg.
301.7701–15(a)(4))
- A
person who only provides
Mechanical assistance in the
preparation of an income tax
return or claim for refund (e.g.,
provides typing and/or reproducing
services). (Treas. Reg.
301.7701–15(d)(1))
- A
person who prepares an income tax
return or claim for refund of a
person, or an officer, general
partner, or employee of a person,
by whom the individual is
regularly and continuously
employed or in which the
individual is a general partner.
(Treas. Reg. 301.7701–15(d)(2))
- A
person who prepares an income tax
return or claim for refund for an
estate or a trust but only if such
person is a fiduciary or is an
officer, general partner, or
employee of the fiduciary. (Treas.
Reg. 301.7701–15(d)(3))
- A
person who prepares a claim for
refund for a taxpayer in response
to a deficiency notice or a waiver
of restriction after initiation of
an audit of the taxpayer or
another taxpayer (if the other
taxpayer's audit affects the
taxpayer in question). (Treas.
Reg. 301.7701–15(d)(4).)
-
Any person who provides tax
assistance under the VITA program.
(Treas. Reg. 301.7701–15(a)(7).)
-
Understatement of liability.
The term means any understatement of
the net amount payable with respect to
any income taxes or any overstatement
of the net amount creditable or
refundable with respect to any income
taxes. The determination of whether
there is any understatement of
liability is made without regard to
any administrative or judicial action
involving the taxpayer. The exception
to this rule is where there is a final
administrative determination or a
final judicial decision that there was
no understatement of liability. In
such cases, the assessed penalty must
be abated. However, if the taxpayer's
liability is eliminated by a NOL, the
penalty should not be abated. (Rev.
Rul. 82–25, 1982–1 C.B. 214.)
-
Rules of regulations.
The term includes the provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code, the
Treasury regulations issued under the
Code, and Internal Revenue Service
revenue rulings published in the
Cumulative Bulletin. (Treas. Reg.
1.6694–1(a)(3)—Pre OBRA 1989 Treas.
Regs.)
-
Criteria for asserting of the IRC
section 6694(a) penalty:
- An
income tax return preparer,
- An
understatement of income tax
liability, and
-
Understatement due to negligence
or intentional disregard of rules
or regulations. (See IRM
20.1.6.3.2 below)
-
Standards under former IRC section
6653(a) applicable.
In the Conference Report on the
Revenue Act of 1978 relating to
Technical Corrections to the Tax
Reform Act of 1976, 1978–3 C.B. (Vol.
1) 521, 618, the conferees
specifically directed the Service to
"reasonably interpret IRC section
6694(a) according to the standards of
IRC section 6653(a) and in light of
all the facts and circumstances of
each case, taking into account any and
all mitigating factors." Therefore, in
determining whether a preparer has
negligently or intentionally
disregarded a rule or regulation,
apply the same standards as applied in
determining the application of the
former IRC section 6653 penalty
against taxpayers. The Conference
Report also states that for purposes
of IRC section 6694(a), "the view of
the taxpayer concerning a rule or
regulation is not material."
Accordingly, it is not necessary for
the IRC section 6653(a) penalty to be
asserted against a taxpayer in order
to justify the assertion of the IRC
section 6694(a) penalty against the
preparer of the taxpayer's return.
-
Negligence.
Negligence is generally understood to
mean a lack of due care or failure to
do what a reasonable and ordinary
prudent person would do under the
circumstances. In determining whether
the preparer negligently disregarded a
rule or regulation, all the relevant
facts and circumstances of the case
should be taken into account,
including the following factors:
-
Nature of the error causing the
understatement;
-
Frequency of the error; and
-
Materiality of the error
-
Note:
Even though consideration of the
above factors still suggests
negligence, the penalty is not
warranted if the preparer's normal
office practice, when considered
together with other facts and
circumstances (such as the
knowledge of the preparer)
indicates that the error in
question would rarely occur and
the normal office practice was
followed in preparing the
return/claim for refund.
- In
addition, the IRC section 6694(a)
penalty generally should not be
applied if a preparer, in good
faith, relied without verification
on information furnished by the
taxpayer. However, reliance will
not preclude the imposition of the
penalty if the preparer should
have made appropriate inquiries to
determine the existence of facts
and circumstances required by the
Code or regulations. (Rev. Proc.
80–40, 1980–1 C.B. 774)
-
Negligence does not apply.
A preparer will not be considered to
have negligently or intentionally
disregarded a rule or regulation if:
-
Due Diligence.
A preparer exercised due diligence
in an effort to apply the rule or
regulation to the information
given to the preparer to determine
the taxpayer's correct tax
liability. (Treas. Reg.
1.6694–1(a)—Pre OBRA 1989 Treas.
Regs.)
-
Good Faith &
Reasonable Basis.
A preparer in good faith and with
reasonable basis took the position
that a rule or regulation did not
accurately reflect the Code and
did not follow it. (Treas. Reg.
1.6694–1(a)(4)—Pre OBRA 1989
Treas. Regs.)
-
Burden of Proof.
The preparer bears the burden of
proof on the issue of whether the
preparer has negligently or
intentionally disregarded a rule
or regulation. The preparer will
have satisfied this burden if
1.) the preparer presents evidence
that his/her normal office
practice concerning the treatment
of the particular item was not
negligent and that this normal
practice was followed, and 2.) the
IRC does not have contrary
evidence. (Treas. Reg.
1.6694–1(a)(5)—Pre OBRA 1989
Treas. Regs.)
-
Criteria for imposition of the IRC
section 6694(b) penalty:
- An
income tax return preparer, (See
IRM 20.1.6.3.2 below)
- An
understatement of income tax
liability, and (See IRM 20.1.6.3.2
below)
-
Willful attempt to understate
income tax liability. (See IRM
20.1.6.3.1 below)
-
Willful understatement.
A preparer has willfully attempted to
understate the income tax liability of
the taxpayer if the preparer
disregards information furnished by
the taxpayer or other persons in an
attempt wrongfully to reduce the
income tax liability of the taxpayer.
In some cases, a penalty for willful
understatement may be based on an
intentional disregard of rules or
regulations. In such cases, the
preparer will be subject to both the
IRC section 6694(a) and the IRC
section 6694(b) penalties. (Treas.
Reg. 1.6694–1(b)(2)—Pre OBRA 1989
Treas. Regs.)
-
Verification of information: As
in the case of the IRC section 6694(a)
penalty, independent verification of
the information furnished by the
taxpayer, generally, is not required.
(Treas. Reg. 1.6694–1(b)(2)—Pre OBRA
1989 Treas. Regs.)
-
When both IRC section 6694(a) and (b)
penalties apply.
If both penalties apply to a preparer,
the IRC section 6694(b) penalty amount
must be reduced by the IRC section
6694(a) penalty amount. Therefore,
examiners should ensure that the
combined assessment of the IRC section
6694(a) and (b) penalties against a
preparer do not exceed $500 with
respect to a return or claim for
refund ($100 for IRC section 6694(a)
penalty and $400 for IRC section
6694(b) penalty).
-
Burden of Proof: The
IRS bears the burden of proof on the
issue of whether the preparer has
willfully attempted to understate the
income tax liability. (IRC section
7427 and Treas. Reg.
1.6694–1(b)(5)—Pre OBRA 1989 Treas.
Regs.)
20.1.6.3.2 (07-08-1999)
Returns and Claims for Refund
Prepared After 12/31/89 Definitions
-
Income tax return preparer.
The definition of the term is the same
as under IRM 20.1.6.1.10 above with
one modification. For documents
prepared and advice given after
12/31/91, and only for purposes of the
IRC section 6694 penalties, the new
regulations provide that no more than
one individual associated with a firm
will be treated as a preparer with
respect to the same return or claim
for refund (one-preparer-per-firm
rule).
-
Signing preparer.
If a signing preparer is
associated with a firm, that
individual, and no other
individual in the firm, is treated
as an income tax return preparer
with respect to the return or
claim for refund. (Treas. Reg.
1.6694–1(b)(1)—Post OBRA 1989
Treas. Regs.)
-
Nonsigning
preparer.
If two or more individuals
associated with a firm are income
tax return preparers and none of
them is the signing preparer,
ordinarily, the one individual who
will be treated as the preparer is
the individual with overall
supervisory responsibility for the
advice given by the firm. For an
example, see Treas. Reg.
1.6694–1(b)(3)—Post OBRA 1989
Treas. Regs.
-
Note: The
one-preparer-per-firm rule does
not mean that an IRC section 6694
penalty cannot also be asserted
against the firm, as an employer.
It also does not mean that there
can never be more than one
preparer per return. For example,
if a CPA receives advice from an
attorney (who is not associated
with the same firm) and the advice
constitutes a substantial portion
of the return, both the CPA and
the attorney are income tax return
preparers with respect to that
return.
-
Understatement of Liability.The
definition of the term is the same as
under prior law. The new regulations
now expressly provide that the net
amount payable is not reduced by any
carryback. Thus, it incorporates the
position stated in Rev. Rul. 82–25.
(Treas. Reg. 1.6694–1(c)—Post OBRA
1989 Treas. Regs.)
-
Rules or regulations.
The definition of the term was
expanded by the new regulations. This
term now includes the provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code, temporary
or final Treasury regulations issued
under the Code, and revenue rulings or
notices (other than notices of
proposed rule making) issued by the
IRS and published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin. (Treas. Reg.
1.6694–3(f)—Post OBRA 1989 Treas.
Regs.)
-
Frivolous position.
A "frivolous position" is a position
that is patently improper. (Treas.
Reg. 1.6694–2(c)(2)—Post OBRA 1989
Treas. Regs.)
-
Criteria for imposition of the IRC
section 6694(a) penalty:
- An
income tax return preparer, (See
IRM 20.1.6.1.10 above.)
- An
understatement of income tax
liability (See IRM 20.1.6.1.10
above.)
-
Understatement due to a position
that has no realistic possibility
of being sustained on the merits
and the income tax return preparer
knew or reasonably should have
known of such position, (See IRM
20.1.6.1.10 above.)
- No
adequate disclosure, or a
frivolous position, and (See IRM
20.1.6.1.10 above.)
- No
reasonable cause and good faith
(See IRM 20.1.6.1.9 above .)
-
Unrealistic position.
In order for the IRC section 6694(a)
penalty to apply, the understatement
of the income tax liability must be
due to a position for which there was
not a realistic possibility of being
sustained on its merits (realistic
possibility standard). Also, the
preparer must have know or reasonably
should have known of such position.
-
One-in-three rule.
A position is considered to have
satisfied the realistic possibility
standard if a reasonable and
well-informed analysis by a person
knowledgeable in the tax law would
lead such a person to conclude that
the position has approximately a one
in three, or greater, likelihood of
being sustained on its merits. To make
this determination, the analysis
prescribed by Treas. Reg.
1.6662–4(d)(3)(ii) for making the
substantial authority determination
should be applied. Also, the same
authorities should be considered.
(Treas. Reg. 1.6694–2(b)—Post OBRA
1989 Treas. Regs.)
-
Adequate disclosure exception.
The IRC section 6694(a) penalty does
not apply if the position taken is not
frivolous and is adequately disclosed.
-
Signing preparers.
The disclosure must be made on a
properly completed and filed Form
8275 (Disclosure Statement) or
8275–R (Regulation Disclosure
Statement), as appropriate, or on
the return in accordance with an
annual revenue procedure. (Treas.
Reg. 1.6694–2(c)(3)(i)—Post OBRA
1989 Treas. Regs.)
-
Nonsigning
preparers.
The disclosure may be made in the
manner prescribed above for
signing preparers or by including
in the advice to the taxpayer (or
to another preparer) a statement
that contains the information
required by Treas. Reg.
1.6694–2(c)(3)(ii).
-
Reasonable cause and good faith
exception.
The IRC section 6694(a) penalty also
does not apply if, considering all the
facts and circumstances, it is
determined that the understatement was
due to reasonable cause and that the
preparer acted in good faith. The
factors to consider include:
-
Nature of the error causing the
understatement,
-
Frequency of errors,
-
Materiality of errors,
-
Preparer's normal office practice,
and
-
Reliance on the advice of another
preparer. (Treas. Reg.
1.6694–2(d)—Post OBRA 1989 Treas.
Regs.)
-
Verification of information.
As under prior law, a preparer,
generally, does not have to
independently verify the information
furnished by the taxpayer. (Treas.
Reg. 1.6694–1(e)—Post OBRA 1989 Treas.
Regs.)
-
When Both IRC section 6694(a) and IRC
section 6694(b) Penalties Apply.
As under prior law, if both penalties
apply to a preparer, the IRC section
6694(b) penalty amount must be reduced
by the IRC section 6694(a) penalty
amount. Therefore, the examiner should
ensure that the combined assessment of
the IRC section 6694(a) and (b)
penalties against a preparer do not
exceed $1,000 with respect to one
return or claim for refund ($250 for
the IRC section 6694(a) penalty and
$750 for the IRC section 6694(b)
penalty).
-
Burden of Proof.
The preparer bears the burden of proof
with respect to:
-
Whether the preparer knew or
reasonably should have known that
the questioned position was taken
on the return/claim for refund,
-
Whether there is reasonable cause
and good faith, and
-
Whether the position was
adequately disclosed. (Treas. Reg.
1.6694–2(e)—Post OBRA 1989 Treas.
Regs.)
-
Criteria for imposition of the IRC
section 6694(b) penalty:
- An
income tax return preparer, (See
IRM 20.1.6.3.2 above.)
- An
understatement of income tax
liability, and
- An
understatement due to a willful
attempt to understate the income
tax liability or due to any
reckless or intentional disregard
of rules or regulations.
-
Willful Understatement.
Same definition as under prior law.
(See IRM 20.1.6.1.9)
-
Reckless or Intentional Disregard.
In general, a preparer is considered
to have recklessly or intentionally
disregarded a rule or regulation if
the preparer takes a position that is
contrary to a rule or regulation and
the preparer knows of, or is reckless
in not knowing of, the rule or
regulation in question. A preparer is
reckless in not knowing of a rule or
regulation if he/she makes little or
no effort to determine whether a rule
or regulation exists, under
circumstances which demonstrate a
substantial deviation from the
standard of conduct that a reasonable
preparer would observe in the
situation.
-
Adequate disclosure.
A preparer will not be considered to
have recklessly or intentionally
disregarded a rule or regulation if
the position is not frivolous and is
adequately disclosed in accordance
with Treas. Reg. 1.6694–3(e). If the
position taken is contrary to a
regulation, the position must also
represent a good faith challenge to
the validity of the regulation. As in
the case of the IRC section 6694(a)
penalty, the method of making adequate
disclosure is different for signing
and nonsigning preparers.
-
Positions contrary to a revenue ruling
or a notice but which satisfy the
realistic possibility standard.
A preparer will not be considered to
have recklessly or intentionally
disregarded a revenue ruling or a
notice if the position contrary to the
revenue ruling or notice satisfies the
realistic possibility standard. This
rule does not also apply to a position
contrary to a regulation. (Treas. Reg.
1.6694–3(c)—Post OBRA 1989 Treas.
Regs.)
-
Verification of information.
Same rule as under IRM 20.1.6.3.2
above.
-
When Both IRC section 6694(a) and IRC
section 6694(b) Penalties Apply.
If both penalties apply to a preparer,
the IRC section 6694(b) penalty amount
must be reduced by the IRC section
6694(a) penalty amount.
-
Burden of Proof.
The IRS bears the burden of proof on
the issue of whether the preparer
willfully attempted to understate the
income tax liability. The preparer
bears the burden of proof on issues
such as:
-
Whether the preparer recklessly or
intentionally disregarded a rule
or regulation,
-
Whether a position contrary to a
regulation represents a good faith
challenge to the validity of the
regulation, and
-
Whether disclosure was adequately
made. (Treas. Reg.
1.6694–3(h)—Post OBRA 1989 Treas.
Regs.)
20.1.6.3.3 (07-08-1999)
Coordination with Other Penalties
-
Although IRC section 6694 and IRC
section 6701 set different standards
for imposition of each penalty, in
some instances both penalties could
apply. IRC section 6701(f) provides
that a penalty under IRC section 6694
may not be assessed if a penalty has
already been assessed under IRC
section 6701. This provision allows
the Service to choose which penalty to
assert if both apply to a set of
facts, but prohibits the Service from
assessing penalties under both
sections for the same act.
- The
preparer penalties imposed by IRC
section 6694(b) and 6701 require
different activities as grounds for
assertion. Thus, the penalty under IRC
section 6701 may apply in cases in
which the IRC section 6694(b) penalty
would not apply and vice versa.
- As
with all income tax examinations, the
examiner should consider whether the
negligence penalty under former IRC
section 6653(a) or the IRC section
6662 accuracy-related penalties are
applicable to the taxpayer. Assertion
of the penalty under IRC section 6694
against the income tax preparer does
not preclude assertion of the penalty
against the taxpayer under former IRC
section 6653(a) or IRC section 6662.
- IRC
section 6695 identification penalties
can be asserted in conjunction with
IRC section 6694 conduct penalties.
20.1.6.3.4 (07-08-1999)
Who Asserts the Penalty
- Area
Examination Revenue Agents and Tax
Auditors have responsibility for
asserting the IRC section 6694
penalties.
20.1.6.3.5 (07-08-1999)
Asserting the IRC Section 6694
Penalties
- The
income tax return preparer penalty
cases are the key enforcement vehicle
for identifying and penalizing
noncompliant preparers. In preparer
penalty cases, the Service focuses on
the conduct of the preparer rather
than the taxpayer and determines if
that conduct warrants penalties. If
preparer penalty cases are not opened,
preparer misconduct may not be
identified and penalized, and return
preparer coordinators may not have the
information necessary to identify
patterns of noncompliance and initiate
program action cases. However, in
conformity with Policy Statement
P–1–18, examiners will not
automatically assess preparer
penalties based solely on a
determination of deficiency proposed
in a related taxpayer's examination.
Examiners will ensure that preparer
penalties are used for their proper
purpose and not as an automatic and
mechanical component of the
examination process.
- During
every field and office examination,
examiners will determine if an income
tax return preparer conduct violation
exists. If there are indications of
misconduct, the examiner should open a
preparer penalty case to determine if
sanctions against the preparer are
warranted. In this regard:
-
Each income tax examination is
separate and distinct from the
return preparer violation case
relating to the income tax
examination.
-
Examiners will not propose or
discuss conduct penalties per se
in the presence of the taxpayer.
-
During the income tax examination,
examiners will inquire, as
warranted, to develop facts and
circumstances to determine whether
or not a preparer penalty case
should be opened.
-
Generally, no return preparer
penalty will be proposed until the
income tax examination is
completed at the group level.
Where practical, the preparer case
may remain open after completing
the income tax case. However, if
the preparer case is inseparable
from the income tax examination,
both cases may be closed together.
If the income tax case is
unagreed, the examiner may pursue
the preparer penalty after the
unagreed income tax case is
submitted at the group level.
-
The determination on and
settlement of the income tax
examination will at all times
proceed without regard to the
return preparer penalty issue.
-
CAUTION: On
Forms 4813 and 4700–A Examination
workpapers, the examiner should
only document the fact that the
required inquiries on the return
preparer issues were completed.
The taxpayer's answers to these
inquiries should not be written on
Forms 4318 and 4700–A, nor should
they be included in any other
workpapers in the taxpayer's case
file. All information on the
return preparer's activities and
the applicability of any penalties
relating to the return preparer
should be separated from the
taxpayer's case file. If the
information were included in the
case file, it would be disclosed
to the taxpayer if the taxpayer
requested a copy of the case file.
This would constitute an IRS
disclosure violation, since
information regarding the return
preparer's liability for taxes is
confidential.
- For
returns prepared prior to January 1,
1990, Rev. Proc. 80–40, 1980–2 C.B.
774, sets forth guidelines for the
application of the penalty under IRC
section 6694(a) for the negligent
disregard of rules and regulations by
an income tax return preparer.
-
The revenue procedure indicates
that the Service will consider the
nature of the error causing the
understatement, the frequency of
the errors and the materiality of
the errors.
-
Rev. Proc. 80–40 specifically
provides that an isolated
mathematical or clerical error
ordinarily reflects no more than
mere inadvertence and thus will
not result in the assertion of the
penalty unless the error is of
such magnitude or so conspicuous
that it should have been
discovered after its commission.
-
The revenue procedure also
provides that where all the
relevant facts and circumstances
suggest that the return was
negligently prepared, the penalty
will not be asserted if the
preparer's normal office practice,
when considered together with
other facts and circumstances,
indicates that the error in
question would rarely occur, and
the normal office practice was
followed in preparing the return
in question.
-
Example applications of IRC section
6694(a) and (b) can be found in Treas.
Regs. 1.6694–2 and 3.
-
Revenue Ruling 81–171, 1981–1 C.B.
589, states that the IRC section
6694(a) penalty may be asserted for
each taxable year return affected by a
return preparer's negligent or
intentional overstatement of expenses
on a taxpayer's return that created a
net operating loss that was carried
back for 3 years and carried forward
to the succeeding year's return. The
IRC section 6694(a) penalty for the
succeeding year will apply even though
that year's return was prepared by a
second preparer who used the
information from the prior years'
returns. No penalty may be imposed
against the second preparer.
-
Revenue Ruling 81–270, 1981–2 C.B.
250, states that if an understatement
of liability on the individual income
tax return of a limited partner is due
to the negligent or intentional
disregard of the rules and regulations
by a general partner in preparing
Schedule K–1 of a partnership return
and the entries on that schedule
constitute a substantial portion of
the limited partner's return, then the
IRC section 6694(a) penalty may be
imposed on the general partner.
-
Treasury regulations provide that a
6694(b) penalty for willful
understatement is warranted when a
preparer disregards information
furnished by the taxpayer. An example
of this willful conduct would be the
intentional overstatement of business
expense deductions in spite of a
detailed expense register provided to
the preparer by the taxpayer.
-
Case Development.
Although the development of the
penalty case will depend on specific
facts and circumstances, the examiner
should, at a minimum, observe the
following:
-
When the taxpayer is questioned in
the course of the examination on
items that relate to a potential
preparer penalty, the questions
will be phrased narrowly and
directly without having to
introduce or define a "preparer
penalty" issue per se.
-
The examiner should question the
taxpayer concerning conversations
with and information given to the
preparer. If available, copies of
the relevant documents, including
the return containing the
understatement, should be
incorporated into the case file.
Care should be taken in
interpreting these conversations.
For example, the statement,
"mileage claimed was for commuting
between home and the office" does
not affix preparer culpability for
the disallowed expense. However,
if the preparer specifically
questioned the taxpayer about
business related travel and
received the above response
without qualifying or explaining
the term "business-related" to the
taxpayer and/or without further
questioning the taxpayer
concerning the nature of this
travel, a penalty may be
warranted.
-
If, after evaluating the
information gathered, the examiner
determines that a penalty is
warranted, the examiner should
prepare Form 6459, Return
Preparer's Check sheet (IRC
section 6694 and IRC section
6695), and secure the group
manager's approval.
-
After securing approval, the
examiner should contact the
preparer to fully develop the
facts regarding the preparation of
the income tax return. The
following areas should be
developed: 1.) the preparer's
education, training, and
experience; 2.) the office
procedures, if any, that were
employed by the preparer to insure
that a correct return was
prepared; and 3.) the preparer's
explanation regarding the errors
found by the examiner.
-
Preparer Penalty Case File.
Once managerial approval is secured,
the examiner should prepare the Form
5809, Preparer Penalty Case Control
Card, and distribute it as follows:
-
Original—Remains in the penalty
case file.
-
Copy A—Retained in group for
control purposes.
-
Copy B—May be used as a Form 895
or not used.
-
Copy C—Send to Return Preparer
Coordinator.
-
Copy D—Send to Return Preparer
Coordinator when the penalty case
file is closed. (If no penalty is
recommended by the examiner, then
this form is sent to the RPC to
close internal controls.)
- The
examiner charges time to the penalty
case file using the following activity
codes:
-
Activity Code 501/500 for IRC
section 6694(a) cases, and
-
Activity Code 502/500 for IRC
section 6694(b) cases.
-
Workpapers.
The following information should be
included in the case file:
-
The first two pages of the related
income tax return, and any
schedules related to the
understatement;
-
Copy of the related income tax
report; and
-
Copies of relevant workpapers from
the income tax case file and
additional information sufficient
to enable Case Processing Support
Staff or Appeals to
determine: 1.) what information
was provided to the preparer by
the taxpayer, 2.) why the
preparer's action or inaction
warranted the application of the
penalty, and 3.) the preparer's
position regarding the penalty.
- An
affidavit secured from the
taxpayer, whenever appropriate.
This affidavit should clearly
indicate exactly when and what
information was provided to the
preparer and the content of any
pertinent conversations between
the taxpayer and the preparer.
(See IRM 20.1.6.1.7 above
regarding content of affidavits.)
-
Assembly of Case File.
The case file will include a copy of
the report of proposed adjustments,
the tax return, and relevant
workpapers. The Form 5816, Report of
Income Tax Return Preparer Penalty, is
used for agreed and unagreed cases.
See Exhibit 20.1.6–1 for a list of
forms that should be included in the
preparer penalty case file when
appropriate.
- The
increased rate does not change the
monthly period for accruing the
penalty. For example, a penalty which
is accruing on the 16th day of the
month at the one-half percent rate
will first accrue at the 1 percent
rate on the 16th day of the month
following the trigger date, unless
that date is the 16th. It will then
continue to accrue at 1 percent until
paid or until the 25 percent maximum
penalty is reached.
20.1.6.3.6 (07-08-1999)
Case Processing Support Staff
Function and Case File Assembly
-
Preparer penalty cases are not subject
to mandatory review. Groups will close
cases to Case Processing Support for
processing using Form 3198, following
area guidelines.
- For
unagreed cases, Form 5816, Report of
Income Tax Return Preparer Penalty,
and a statement of reasons for
asserting the penalty will accompany
Letter 1125 (AO).
- Form
5816 will be forwarded to the
Examination Return Preparer
Coordinator (RPC) for the income tax
return preparer's area. For all
unagreed cases, Letter 1125 (AO) will
advise the preparer of his/her appeal
rights. The preparer has 30 days to
ask for Appeals consideration and to
file any protest required.
- Upon
receipt of a protest, the case will be
reviewed for adequacy of the protest,
development of the issue, and
managerial involvement.
- If the
related income tax case is unagreed,
the unagreed preparer penalty case may
not be submitted to Appeals before the
income tax case is submitted to
Appeals. An unagreed preparer penalty
case may not be submitted to Appeals
if there are less than 120 days
remaining on the statute of
limitations. In these instances, for
IRC section 6694(a) and 6695
penalties, the examiner will first
solicit an extension on Form 872–D,
Consent to Extend the Time on Tax
Return Preparer Penalty.
Note:
Where
the statute of limitations for the
assessment of penalties may expire
without adequate opportunity for
preassessment appeal rights,
Technical Support Staff will, before
assessment of these penalties, send
the preparer a copy of Form 5816,
Report of Income Tax Return Preparer
Penalty, along with an explanation
of the reason for the quick
assessment and the preparer's appeal
rights.
- In
agreed and unagreed cases, Form 5808,
Return Preparer Penalty Follow-up, and
Copy D of Form 5809, Preparer Penalty
Case Control Card, will be forwarded
by Technical Support to the RPC.
- If the
examiner has determined that no
penalty is warranted, the no-change
Letter 1120 will be prepared at the
group level and left undated in the
file. Technical Support will date and
issue the letter if the case is
selected for sample review, otherwise
the letter will be issued according to
area policy.
- After
mailing Letter 1120, no-change case
files will be forwarded to the RPC.
Pertinent information from the file
will be recorded on Form 5808, and
retained by the RPC for not less than
one year. The balance of a no-change
case file is not retained.
20.1.6.3.7 (07-08-1999)
Examples of IRC section 6694(a)
Penalty Application
-
Example 1.
A new statute is unclear as to whether
a certain transaction that a taxpayer
has engaged in will result in
favorable tax treatment. Prior law,
however, supported the taxpayer's
position. There are no regulations
under the new statute and no authority
other than the statutory language and
committee reports. The committee
reports state that the intent was not
to adversely affect transactions
similar to the taxpayer's transaction.
The taxpayer's position satisfies the
realistic possibility standard.
-
Example 2.
A taxpayer has engaged in a
transaction that is adversely affected
by a new statutory provision. Prior
law supported a position favorable to
the taxpayer. The preparer believes
that the new statute is inequitable as
applied to the taxpayer's situation.
The statutory language is unambiguous
as it applies to the transaction
(e.g., it applies to all manufacturers
and the taxpayer is a manufacturer of
widgets). The committee reports do not
specifically address the taxpayer's
situation. A position contrary to the
statutes does not satisfy the
realistic possibility standard.
-
Example 3.
The facts are the same as in Example
2, except the committee reports
indicate that Congress did not intend
to apply the new statutory provision
to the taxpayer's transaction (e.g.,
to a manufacturer of widgets). Thus,
there is a conflict between the
general language of the statute, which
adversely affects the taxpayer's
transaction, and a specific statement
in the committee reports that
transactions such as the taxpayer's
are not adversely affected. A position
consistent with either the statute or
the committee reports satisfies the
realistic possibility standard.
However, a position consistent with
the committee reports constitutes a
disregard of a rule or regulation and,
therefore, must be adequately
disclosed in order to avoid the IRC
section 6694(b) penalty.
-
Example 4.
The instructions to an item on a tax
form published by the Internal Revenue
Service are incorrect and are clearly
contrary to the regulations. Before
the return is prepared, the Internal
Revenue Service publishes an
announcement acknowledging the error
and providing the correct instruction.
Under these facts, a position taken on
a return which is consistent with the
regulations satisfies the realistic
possibility standard. On the other
hand, a position taken on a return
which is consistent with the incorrect
instructions does not satisfy the
realistic possibility standard.
However, if the preparer relied on the
incorrect instructions and was not
aware of the announcement or the
regulations, the reasonable cause and
good faith exception may apply
depending on all facts and
circumstances. See 1.6694–2(d).
-
Example 5.
A statute is silent as to whether a
taxpayer may take a certain position
on the taxpayer's 1991 Federal income
tax return. Three private letter
rulings issued to other taxpayers in
1987 and 1988 support the taxpayer's
position. However, proposed
regulations issued in 1990 are clearly
contrary to the taxpayer's position.
After the issuance of the proposed
regulations, the earlier private
letter rulings cease to be authorities
and are not taken into account in
determining whether the taxpayer's
position satisfies the realistic
possibility standard. See Treas. Reg.
1.6694–2(b)(2) and
1.6662–4(d)(3)(iii). The taxpayer's
position may or may not satisfy the
realistic possibility standard,
depending on an analysis of all the
relevant authorities.
-
Example 6.
In the course of researching whether a
particular position has a realistic
possibility of being sustained on its
merits, a preparer discovers that a
taxpayer took the same position on a
return several years ago and that the
return was audited by the Service. The
taxpayer tells the preparer that the
revenue agent who conducted the audit
was aware of the position and decided
that the treatment on the return was
correct.
-
The determination by the revenue
agent is not authority for
purposes of the realistic
possibility standard.
-
However, the preparer's reliance
on the revenue agent's
determination in the audit may
qualify for the reasonable cause
and good faith exception depending
on all facts and circumstances.
-
See Treas. Reg. 1.6694–2(d). Also
see Treas. Reg. 1.6694–2(b)(4) and
1.6662–4(d)(3)(iv)(A) regarding
affirmative statements in a
revenue agent's report.
-
Example 7.
In the course of researching whether
an interpretation of a phrase
incorporated in the Internal Revenue
Code has a realistic possibility of
being sustained on its merits, a
preparer discovers that identical
language in the taxing statute of
another jurisdiction (e.g., a state or
foreign country) has been
authoritatively construed by a court
of that jurisdiction in a manner which
would be favorable to the taxpayer, if
the same interpretation were applied
to the phrase applicable to the
taxpayer's situation.
-
The construction of the statute of
the other jurisdiction is not
authority for purposes of
determining whether the position
satisfies the realistic
possibility standard. See Treas.
Reg. 1.6694–2(b)(2) and Treas.
Reg. 1.6662–4(d)(3)(iii).
-
However, as in the case of
conclusions reached in treatises
and legal periodicals, the
authorities underlying the court's
opinion, if relevant to the
taxpayer's situation, may give a
position favorable to the taxpayer
a realistic possibility of being
sustained on its merits. See
Treas. Reg. 1.6694–2(b)(2) and
Treas. Reg. 1.6662–4(d)(3)(iii).
-
Example 8.
In the course of researching whether
an interpretation of a statutory
phrase "has a realistic possibility of
being sustained on its merits," a
preparer discovers that identical
language appearing in another place in
the Internal Revenue Code has
consistently been interpreted by the
courts and by the Service in a manner
which would be favorable to the
taxpayer if the same interpretation
were applied to the phrase applicable
to the taxpayer's situation.
- No
authority has interpreted the
phrase applicable to the
taxpayer's situation.
-
The interpretations of the
identical language are relevant in
arriving at a well reasoned
construction of the language at
issue, but the context in which
the language arises also must be
taken into account in determining
whether the realistic possibility
standard is satisfied.
-
Example 9.
A new statutory provision is silent on
the tax treatment of an item under the
provision. However, the committee
reports explaining the provision
direct the Treasury to issue
regulations interpreting the provision
in a specified way. No regulations
have been issued at the time the
preparer must recommend a position on
the tax treatment of the item, and no
other authorities exist. The position
supported by the committee reports
satisfies the realistic possibility
standard.
- IRC
section 6694(a) examples are from
Treas. Regs. 1.6694–2(b)(3).
20.1.6.3.8 (07-08-1999)
Examples of IRC Section 6694(b)
Penalty Application
-
Example 1.
A taxpayer provided a preparer with
detailed check registers reflecting
personal and business expenses. One of
the expenses was for domestic help,
and this expense was identified as
personal on the check register. The
preparer knowingly deducted the
expenses of the taxpayer's domestic
help as wages paid in the taxpayer's
business. The preparer is subject to
the penalty under IRC section 6694(b).
-
Example 2.
A taxpayer provided a preparer with
detailed check registers to compute
the taxpayer's expenses. However, the
preparer knowingly overstated the
expenses on the return. After
adjustments by the examiner, the tax
liability increased significantly.
Because the preparer disregarded
information provided in the check
registers, the preparer is subject to
the penalty under IRC section 6694(b).
-
Example 3.
A revenue ruling holds that certain
expenses incurred in the purchase of a
business must be capitalized. The Code
is silent as to whether these expenses
must be capitalized or may be deducted
currently, but several cases from
different courts hold that these
particular expenses may be deducted
currently. There is no other
authority.
-
Under these facts, a position
taken contrary to the revenue
ruling on a return or claim for
refund is not a reckless or
intentional disregard of a rule,
since the position contrary to the
revenue ruling has a realistic
possibility of being sustained on
its merits.
-
Therefore, the preparer will not
be subject to a penalty under IRC
section 6694(b) even though the
position is not adequately
disclosed.
-
Example 4.
Final regulations provide that certain
expenses incurred in the purchase of a
business must be capitalized. One Tax
Court case has expressly invalidated
that portion of the regulations. Under
these facts, a position contrary to
the regulation will subject the
preparer to the IRC section 6694(b)
penalty even though the position may
have a realistic possibility of being
sustained on its merits. However,
because the contrary position on these
facts represents a good faith
challenge to the validity of the
regulations, the preparer will not be
subject to the IRC section 6694(b)
penalty if the position is adequately
disclosed in the manner provided in
Treas. Reg. 1.6694–3(e).
- IRC
section 6694(b) examples are from
Treas. Regs. 1.6694–3(d).
20.1.6.3.9 (07-08-1999)
Appeal Rights
- See
IRM 20.1.6.1.3 above.
20.1.6.3.10 (07-08-1999)
Statute of Limitations
- The
statute of limitations on assessment
for IRC section 6694(a) penalties
expires three years from the due date
of the related return or the date the
return is filed whichever is later.
(See IRM 21.1.6.1.8.)
- There
is no statute of limitations on
assessment for IRC section 6694(b)
penalties.
20.1.6.3.11 (07-08-1999)
Referral to Director of Practice
- See
IRM 20.1.6.1.6 above which includes
guidelines on Program Action Cases.
20.1.6.4
(07-08-1999)
Other Assessable Penalties—IRC Section
6695—Background
- The IRC
section 6695 penalties only apply to
income tax return preparers. For the
definition of "income tax return
preparers," see IRM 20.1.6.3.2 above and
Rev. Rul. 86–55.
- For
returns prepared before January 1, 1990,
the maximum amount of these penalties
are as follows:
- For
IRC section 6695(a), (b) and (c)
penalties, there is no maximum
amount;
- For
IRC section 6695(d) penalty, the
maximum amount is $25,000 per person
for any return period;
- For
IRC section 6695(e) penalty, the
maximum amount is $20,000 per person
for any return period; and
- For
IRC section 6695(f) penalty, there
is no maximum amount.
- The
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1989 (OBRA 1989) changed the amounts of
the penalties per each occurrence
(listed above) and the maximum amounts
which may be asserted. The OBRA 1989
changes apply to documents prepared
after 12/31/89. The maximum amounts
which may be asserted are:
- For
IRC section 6695(a), (b) and (c)
penalties, the maximum amount is
$25,000 per person per year;
- For
IRC section 6695(d) penalty, the
maximum amount remains $25,000 per
person for any return period;
- For
IRC section 6695(e) penalty, the
maximum amount is $25,000 per person
for any return period; and
- For
IRC section 6695(f) penalty, there
is still no maximum amount.
20.1.6.4.1 (07-08-1999)
Failure to Furnish Copy Taxpayer—IRC
Section 6695(a)
- The
IRC section 6695(a) penalty applies if
the preparer fails to comply with IRC
section 6107(a). Under IRC section
6107(a), a preparer is required to
furnish a completed copy of the return
or claim for refund to the taxpayer
before (or at the same time) the
return or claim for refund is
presented to the taxpayer for
signature.
- If
there is an employment arrangement
between two or more preparers, the
requirement to furnish a copy only
applies to the person who employs (or
engages) one or more preparers.
Similarly, if there is a partnership
arrangement, the requirement to
furnish a copy only applies to the
partnership. Treas. Reg. 1.6107–1(c).
- The
IRC section 6695(a) penalty does not
apply if the failure is due to
reasonable cause and not due to
willful neglect. Thus, the penalty for
failure to furnish a copy to the
taxpayer will not be imposed solely
because:
- A
person is a preparer under Treas.
Reg. 301.7701–15(a)(2) and (b) on
account of having given advice on
specific issues of law; or
- A
person is a preparer under Treas.
Reg. 301.7701–15(b)(3) on account
of having prepared another return
(e.g., the partnership return)
which affects the amounts reported
on the return in question (e.g.,
the partner's return).
- The
IRC section 6695(a) penalty will also
not be imposed where a preparer
deletes certain information from the
copy furnished to the taxpayer if the
taxpayer holds an elected or
politically appointed position with
the government of the United States or
a State or political subdivision
thereof and who in order to carry out
their official duties, has arranged
their affairs so that they have less
than full knowledge of their property
they hold or of the debts for which
they are responsible. (See Treas. Reg.
1.6695–1(a)(2).)
20.1.6.4.2 (07-08-1999)
Failure to Sign Return/Claim for
Refund—IRC Section 6695(b)
- The
IRC section 6695(b) penalty applies if
the preparer, who is required by
regulations to sign the taxpayer's
return or claim for refund, fails to
sign the return or claim for refund.
The preparer must manually sign the
return/claim for refund after it is
completed and before it is presented
to the taxpayer for signature.
- The
signature requirement is satisfied if
the preparer manually signs a
photocopy of a completed return/claim
for refund. This requirement is also
satisfied if the preparer signs the
completed return, makes a photocopy of
the return, and the taxpayer signs and
files the photocopy. (Rev. Rul.
78–370, 1978–2 C.B. 336)
- If a
preparer is physically unable to
manually sign a return because of a
temporary or permanent disability, the
IRC section 6695(b) penalty should not
be imposed if the words "Unable to
Sign" are printed, typed, or stamped
on the preparer signature line. Also,
the preparer's name should be printed,
typed, or stamped under the signature
line after the return is completed,
and before it is presented to the
taxpayer for signature. (Rev. Proc.
79–7, 1979–1 C.B. 486)
- In
general, a facsimile signature stamp
or signed gummed label will not do.
The exceptions to this rule are:
- A
preparer of a return or claim for
refund for a nonresident alien may
use a facsimile signature to sign
as preparer if the preparer is
authorized to sign for the
taxpayer using a facsimile
signature. However, the conditions
prescribed in Treas. Reg.
1.6695–1(b)(4)(iii) must be met;
and
- A
preparer of Forms 1041 may use a
facsimile signature to sign the
Forms 1041 if the conditions in
Notice 89–48, 1989–1 C.B. 688, are
met. This exception only applies
to Forms 1041 filed for taxable
years ending after 12/31/87, and
on or before further guidance is
issued.
- If the
preparer required to sign the
return/claim for refund is unavailable
to sign, another preparer must review
the return/claim for refund and then
manually sign the return/claim for
refund.
- If
more than one preparer is involved in
the preparation of the return/claim
for refund, the preparer with primary
responsibility for the overall
substantive accuracy of the
return/claim for refund is the
preparer who must sign the
return/claim for refund. (Rev. Rul.
81–246 provides guidance on who is
required to sign when a department
store licenses a corporation to
prepare returns in its stores.)
- If the
mechanical preparation of the
return/claim for refund is done by a
computer not under the control of the
individual preparer, the manual
signature requirement may be satisfied
by a manually signed attestation by
the individual preparer that all the
information in the return was obtained
from the taxpayer and is true and
correct to the best of the preparer's
knowledge. The attestation must be
attached to the return/claim for
refund and the information contained
in the return or claim for refund must
not be altered by another person.
- A
preparer is not required to sign and
affix an identification number to the
taxpayer's copy of the return. (Rev.
Rul. 78–317)
- The
IRC section 6695(b) penalty does not
apply if the failure was due to
reasonable cause and not due to
willful neglect. If the preparer
asserts reasonable cause, the preparer
should provide a written statement in
substantiation of the preparer's claim
of reasonable cause. The penalty for
failure to sign will not be imposed
solely because:
- A
person is a preparer under Treas.
Reg. 301.7701–15(a)(2) and (b) on
account of having given advice on
specific issues of law;
- A
person is a preparer under Treas.
Reg. 301.7701–15(b)(3) on account
of having prepared another return
(e.g., the partnership return)
which affects the amounts reported
on the return in question (e.g.,
the partner's return); or
- A
preparer claims that the taxpayer
submitted the copy intended for
his files which the preparer is
not required to sign.
20.1.6.4.3 (07-08-1999)
Failure to Furnish Identifying
Number—IRC Section 6695(c)
- The
IRC section 6695(c) penalty applies if
the preparer fails to comply with IRC
section 6109(a)(4). Under IRC section
6109(a)(4) and the regulations
thereunder, the return/claim for
refund must contain:
-
The identifying number of the
preparer required to sign the
return/claim for refund under IRC
section 6695(b); and
-
The identifying number of the
partnership or the identifying
number of the person who employs
(or engages) one or more preparers
(if there is a partnership or
employment arrangement between two
or more preparers).
- The
IRC section 6695(c) penalty does not
apply if the failure was due to
reasonable cause and not due to
willful neglect. Thus, the penalty
will not be imposed solely because:
- A
person is a preparer under Treas.
Reg. 301.7701–15(a)(2) and (b) on
account of having given advice on
specific issues of law;
- A
person is a preparer under Treas.
Reg. 301.7701–15(b)(3) on account
of having prepared another return
(e.g., the partnership return)
which affects the amounts reported
on the return in question (e.g.,
the partner's return);
- A
preparer explains that the
identifying number was partially
or wholly omitted when the return
was printed by a computer and that
a machine malfunction caused the
error; or
-
The preparer's EIN or SSN is on
the return but is missing one or
more digits (examiners can assume,
in most cases, that this is due to
human error and reasonable cause
exists).
- The
IRC section 6695(c) penalty also will
not be imposed against:
- A
preparer who is employed or
engaged by a person who is also a
preparer of the return/claim for
refund; or
- A
preparer who is a partner in a
partnership which is also a
preparer of the return or claim
for refund.
- Rev.
Rul. 81–246, 1981–2 C.B. 249 provides
guidance on whose identifying number
is required to be provided where a
department store licenses a
corporation to prepare returns in its
stores.
- No
more than one penalty of $25/$50 may
be imposed with respect to a single
return/claim for refund.
20.1.6.4.4 (07-08-1999)
Failure to Retain Copy or List—IRC
Section 6695(d)
- The
IRC section 6695(d) penalty applies if
the preparer fails to comply with IRC
section 6107(b). Under IRC section
6107(b) and the regulations
thereunder, a preparer must:
-
Retain a completed copy of the
return/claim for refund, or
alternatively retain a record (by
list, card file, or otherwise) of
all the taxpayers, their taxpayer
identification numbers, the
taxable years, and the type of
returns/claims for refund
prepared;
-
Retain a record (by copy of the
return/claim for refund or by a
list, card file, or otherwise) of
the name of the preparer required
to sign the return/claim for
refund under IRC section 6695(b)
for each return/claim for refund
presented to the taxpayer; and
-
Make such copy or list available
for inspection upon request by the
IRS for a 3-year period following
the close of the return period
(see IRC section 6060(c) for the
definition of "return period" ).
- If
there is an employment arrangement
between two or more preparers, the
requirement to retain a copy or list
only applies to the person who employs
(or engages) one or more preparers.
Similarly, if there is a partnership
arrangement, the requirement to retain
a copy or list only applies to the
partnership. Treas. Reg. 1.6107–1(c).
- The
IRC section 6695(d) penalty does not
apply if the failure was due to
reasonable cause and not due to
willful neglect. Thus, the penalty for
failure to retain a copy or list will
not be imposed solely because:
- A
person is a preparer under Treas.
Reg. 301.7701–15(a)(2) and (b) on
account of having given advice on
specific issues of law; or
- A
person is a preparer under Treas.
Reg. 301.7701–15(b)(3) on account
of having prepared another return
(e.g., the partnership return)
which affects the amounts reported
on the return in question (e.g.,
the partner's return).
20.1.6.4.5 (07-08-1999)
Failure of Preparer-Employer to File
Correct Information Returns
Identifying Preparer-Employees: IRC
Section 6695(e)
- The
IRC section 6695(e) penalty applies if
the preparer fails to comply with IRC
section 6060. Under IRC section
6060(a) and the regulations
thereunder, each person who employs
(or engages) preparers must retain a
record of the name, taxpayer
identification number and place of
work of each preparer employed (or
engaged) by him. For purposes of IRC
section 6060, a partnership is treated
as the employer of the partners.
- The
record may be in any form of
documentation so long as it discloses
on its face which individuals were
employed (or engaged) as preparers
during that period.
- The
record must be retained and made
available for inspection for a 3-year
period following the close of the
return period to which it relates. The
term "return period" means the
12-month period beginning on July 1 of
each year.
- If a
preparer is not employed by another
preparer, such preparer is treated as
his own employer for purposes of this
penalty. Therefore, if a preparer is a
sole proprietor, he must retain and
make available a record with respect
to himself.
- The
IRC section 6695(e) penalty does not
apply if the failure was due to
reasonable cause and not due to
willful neglect.
- The
IRC section 6695(e) penalty must be
assessed within 3 years after the
close of the return period to which
the record relates.
- The
penalty is $50 for each failure to
file a return as required by IRC
section 6060 and $50 for each failure
to include a required item in the
return. The maximum amount of the
penalty imposed on any person for any
return period is $25,000.
20.1.6.4.6 (07-08-1999)
Negotiation of a Taxpayer's Refund
Check—IRC Section 6695(f)
- The
IRC section 6695(f) penalty generally
applies if the preparer endorses or
otherwise negotiates (directly or
through an agent) a refund check
issued to a taxpayer other than if the
preparer was a preparer of the
return/claim for refund that gave rise
to the refund check. For certain
limited exceptions see (3) below.
- A
person in a business other than tax
return preparation who fills out or
reviews returns for its customers may
be a preparer and, thus, subject to
the IRC section 6695(f) penalty if
such person endorses or otherwise
negotiates the customer's refund
check. (Rev. Rul. 86–55 1986–1 C.B.
138).
- In
certain circumstances, a preparer-bank
may cash a refund check and remit the
cash to the taxpayer or may accept a
refund check for deposit to the
taxpayer's account. A preparer-bank
may:
-
Cash a refund check and remit all
the cash to the taxpayer;
-
Accept a refund check for deposit
in full to the taxpayer's account,
provided the bank does not
initially endorse or negotiate the
check (unless the bank has made a
loan to a taxpayer on the basis of
an anticipated refund);
-
Endorse a refund check for deposit
in full to the taxpayer's account
pursuant to a written
authorization of the taxpayer
(unless the bank has made a loan
to the taxpayer on the basis of
the anticipated refund); or
-
Endorse or negotiate a refund
check as part of the check
clearing process after initial
endorsement or negotiation. See
Treas. Reg. 1.6695–2(f)(2).
- There
is no reasonable cause exception to
this penalty.
20.1.6.4.7 (07-08-1999)
Who Asserts the Penalties
-
Examination.
Revenue Agents and Tax Auditors in the
area.
-
Collection.
Revenue Officers may assert only IRC
section 6695(a), (b), and (c)
penalties.
20.1.6.4.8 (07-08-1999)
Examination Procedures
- Of the
seven identification penalties listed
under IRC section 6695, (a), (b), (c),
and (f) may be discovered by the
examiner during an examination
interview or site visitation. These
Code sections all relate to questions
examiners ask in initial interviews
under package audit guidelines or
during a site visit.
- The
penalties under IRC section 6695(d),
(e)(1), and (e)(2) would arise if a
project were being done on a preparer.
These penalties generally would not be
discovered during an income tax
examination of a taxpayer.
- To
assert this penalty the examiner
should prepare Form 6459, Return
Preparer's Check sheet, and secure the
group manager's approval. Once
managerial approval is secured, the
examiner should refer to the
procedures in IRM 20.1.6.3.6 above.
- The
examiner may charge time to the
penalty case using activity code
503500 for IRC section 6695(f)
penalties, and activity code 504500
for IRC section 6695(a) through (e).
20.1.6.4.9 (07-08-1999)
Collection Procedures
- When a
Collection employee secures a
delinquent return or claim, and
determines that a preparer has not
complied with the provisions of IRC
section 6695 for signing a prepared
income tax return or claim (in
original handwriting), for placing
his/her Taxpayer Identification Number
(TIN) on the prepared return or claim,
or for providing the taxpayer with a
completed copy of the prepared return
or claim, a penalty will be asserted.
The Collection employee who secures
the delinquent return or claim will be
responsible for requesting the
assertion of these penalties.
- The
return preparer may be contacted if
relevant information is needed.
- Form
8278, Computation and Assessment of
Miscellaneous Penalties, is used to
assert preparer penalties. Form 8278
will be forwarded to Collection
Support function for input.
20.1.6.4.10 (07-08-1999)
Reasonable Cause Exception
- Except
for the IRC section 6695(f) penalty,
all of the IRC section 6695 penalties
provide that the penalty will not be
imposed if the failure is due to
reasonable cause and not due to
willful neglect.
- An
example of what constitutes reasonable
cause is when the preparer claims
substantial compliance, i.e., despite
exercising reasonable precautions,
certain required preparer data were
omitted because of human error.
- For
other examples, see the IRM section on
the specific IRC section 6695
penalties above.
20.1.6.4.11 (07-08-1999)
Coordination with other Penalties
- IRC
section 6695 identification penalties
may be asserted with any other
penalties including but not limited to
IRC section 6694, IRC section 6701,
and IRC section 6653/6662 asserted
against the taxpayer.
20.1.6.4.12 (07-08-1999)
Claim Processing and Penalty
Abatement
- See
IRM 20.1.6.1.4 and 20.1.6.1.5 above.
20.1.6.4.13 (07-08-1999)
Examination Case File Assembly
- See
IRM 20.1.6.3.5 and 20.1.6.3.6 above.
20.1.6.4.14 (07-08-1999)
Prompt Assessment
- Prompt
assessment procedures apply, when
applicable, to IRC section 6695. The
preparer will have post-assessment
appeal rights.
20.1.6.4.15 (07-08-1999)
Appeal Rights
20.1.6.4.16 (07-08-1999)
Statute of Limitations
- The
statute of limitations on assessment
for IRC 6695 penalties expires three
years from the due date of the related
return or the date filed, whichever is
later. (See IRM 20.1.6.1.8.)
20.1.6.4.17 (07-08-1999)
Referral to the Director of Practice
- A
referral to the Director of Practice
must be made when an IRC section
6695(f) penalty is assessed against an
attorney, certified public accountant,
enrolled agent, or enrolled actuary.
(See IRM 20.1.6.2.)
20.1.6.4.18 (07-08-1999)
Definitions
- See
IRM 20.1.6.1.9 above for definition of
terms.
20.1.6.5
(07-08-1999)
Penalty for Promoting Abusive Tax
Shelters—IRC Section 6700—Legislative
Overview
- Prior to
enactment of the Tax Equity and Fiscal
Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA 1982),
investors in abusive tax shelters were
penalized through the assertion of the
negligence and valuation overstatement
penalties. Similarly, promoters were
subject to:
-
Civil penalties for the false or
fraudulent preparation of a return
or other document, or
-
Criminal penalties for aiding,
assisting, or advising with the
preparation or presentation of false
or fraudulent returns or other
documents.
- However,
such investor-targeted penalties did
little to discourage the continued
conception and promotion of abusive
shelters.
- TEFRA
1982 enacted IRC section 6700 to permit
the IRS to assert penalties against
promoters of abusive tax shelters.
- As
enacted by TEFRA 1982, the IRC section
6700 penalty amount was the greater of
$1,000 or 10 percent of the gross income
derived from the promotion of the
abusive shelter. As originally enacted,
the penalty applies to any person who
organizes, assists in the organization
of, or participates in the sale of any
interest in any plan or arrangement, and
who, in connection with such sale or
organization, either:
-
Makes or furnishes a false or
fraudulent statement with respect to
the allow ability of any deduction
or credit, the excludability of any
income, or the securing of any tax
benefit by reason of participating
in the entity, plan or arrangement;
or
-
Makes or furnishes a gross valuation
overstatement as to any material
matter.
- The IRC
section 6700 penalty applies to
activities occurring after September 3,
1982.
- The
Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 (DRA 1984)
increased the IRC section 6700 penalty
amount to the greater of $1,000 or 20
percent of the gross income derived from
the activity. This penalty rate applies
to activities occurring after July 19,
1984.
- The
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1989 (OBRA 1989) made a number of
changes to IRC section 6700. These
changes apply to activities occurring
after December 31, 1989.
- OBRA
1989 changed the penalty rate to the
lesser of $1,000 per activity or 100
percent of the gross income derived
from the activity.
- OBRA
1989 clarified that those who
indirectly participate in the sale
of an interest in the shelter and
those who cause another person to
make false statements or gross
overvaluation may be subject to the
penalty.
20.1.6.5
Penalty for Promoting Abusive Tax
Shelters—IRC Section 6700—Legislative
Overview
20.1.6.5.1 (07-08-1999)
Administrative Guidelines
-
Shortly after Congress enacted the
promoter penalties, the Service issued
Rev. Proc. 83–78 1978–2 C.B. 595, and
Rev. Proc. 84–84 1984–2 C.B. 782, to
announce and describe its program for
identifying and investigating abusive
tax shelters.
- In
accordance with this program,
understatements of tax resulting
from abusive shelters are curbed
through the assertion of penalties
under IRC section 6700, the
issuance of injunctions under IRC
section 7408, and the issuance of
pre-filing notices to investors.
(Pre-filing notices are letters to
investors advising them that the
purported tax benefits are not
allowable.)
-
Rev. Proc. 84–84 provides
guidelines for identifying returns
that claim benefits from abusive
tax shelter arrangements before
those returns are processed and
before refunds are issued.
- The
"Examination Tax Shelter Handbook"
explains the goals and objectives of
the IRC section 6700 Program and the
Tax Shelter Program.
20.1.6.5.2 (07-08-1999)
When the Penalty Applies
- There
are two types of conduct subject to
the IRC section 6700 penalty.
- The
penalty may be asserted against a
promoter who makes, furnishes or
causes another to make or furnish a
statement in connection with the sale
or organization of an entity, plan, or
arrangement when the statement relates
to the allowability of any deduction
or credit, the excludability of any
income, or the securing of any tax
benefit by reason of participating in
the entity, plan or arrangement when
the person knows or has reason to know
that the statement is false or
fraudulent as to any material matter.
- The
penalty may also be asserted when a
promoter makes, furnishes or causes
another to make or furnish a statement
in connection with the sale or
organization of an entity, plan, or
arrangement when the statement
contains a gross valuation
overstatement as to any material
matter.
20.1.6.5.3 (07-08-1999)
Who Asserts the Penalty
-
Revenue agents assert the penalty.
20.1.6.5.4 (07-08-1999)
Computing the Penalty
-
Effective September 4, 1982, the
amount of the penalty for each year
was the greater of $1,000 or 10
percent of the gross income derived or
to be derived by the promoter (or
salesperson) from the promotional
activity.
- The
Tax Reform Act of 1984 raised the 10
percent penalty rate to 20 percent for
offenses occurring after July 18,
1984.
-
Section 7734 of OBRA 89 clarifies that
each shelter activity is subject to a
penalty, e.g., each sale of an
interest in a shelter.
-
Under OBRA 89, each sale of an
interest constitutes a separate
activity and is subject to a
$1,000 penalty, but the penalty
cannot exceed the gross income
derived or to be derived from an
activity.
-
The penalty is easily computed if
the promoter is entitled to a flat
fee or commission. However, if the
gross income is contingent or
speculative the Service may
compute the penalty only on the
present value.
-
For the purpose of calculating the
penalty on income "to be derived,"
a prospectus or other sources of
projected income may be used, but
only if it is reasonably likely
that the income will be received.
For example, amounts payable on
sham notes should not be taken
into account.
- A
"person" for purposes of IRC section
6700 is defined in IRC section 7701 to
include an individual, a partnership,
a corporation, a trust or an estate.
However, if the promoter is a
corporation, partnership, or other
entity, the penalty may also be
assessed against the entity's
directors, officers, employees, and
agents who assist in the tax shelter's
promotion.
20.1.6.5.5 (07-08-1999)
Coordination with Other Penalties
- This
penalty is in addition to all other
penalties that may be imposed under
the Code. However, after December 31,
1989, a penalty under IRC section 6701
may not be applied to the same
activities which result in the
application of a penalty under 6700.
(See the discussion in IRM 20.1.6.6.4)
- IRC
section 6694(b) imposes a penalty if a
return preparer understates a
taxpayer's liability as a result of
willful or reckless conduct. In some
instances, a person who is subject to
the penalty under IRC section 6700 may
also be subject to the penalty under
IRC section 6694(b).
- IRC
section 7206(2) relates to any person
who willfully aids or assists etc., in
making fraudulent and false
statements. In some cases, the
promoter might be prosecuted under IRC
section 7206(2) for assisting,
procuring, or advising the preparation
or presentation of a return or other
document which is fraudulent or false.
- IRC
section 7408 authorizes the United
States to commence a civil action at
the request of the Secretary to enjoin
any person from further engaging in
conduct subject to the penalty under
IRC section 6700. The promoter penalty
under IRC section 6700 and the
injunction actions under IRC section
7408 are more effective when applied
prior to the time investors file their
returns. Therefore, abusive tax
shelters should be identified and
penalty investigations initiated
promptly.
- IRC
section 6111 requires tax shelter
organizers to register tax shelters
with the IRS by the day on which
interests in the tax shelter are first
offered for sale. This rule applies to
tax shelters first sold on or after
September 1, 1984. See Treas. Reg.
301.6111–1T(b) (Q&A 58).
-
Tax shelter organizers must use
Form 8264, Application for
Registration of a Tax Shelter.
- A
penalty may be imposed under IRC
section 6707 for failure to timely
register a tax shelter.
-
Criminal penalties may apply for
willful noncompliance with the
registration requirements. See IRC
section 7203.
- IRC
section 6112 requires organizers and
sellers of potentially abusive tax
shelters (for interests sold on or
after September 1, 1984) to maintain a
list identifying each person who
purchases an interest in such tax
shelter. See Treas. Reg.
301.6112–1T(D)(1) (Q&A 22). The list
will contain any other information the
IRS may require and will be available
upon request for inspection. For
failure to maintain the investors
list, the penalty under IRC section
6708 may apply.
20.1.6.5.6 (07-08-1999)
How to Assert the Penalty: Revenue
Agent Responsibilities
- After
the Committee selects the
promoter/scheme, the assigned revenue
agent:
-
Develops facts and circumstances
to determine the applicability of
the penalty,
-
Decides when/if prefiling
notification letters are warranted
by reviewing any false and
fraudulent statements as to
material matters and any assets
overvalued within the meaning of
IRC section 6700(b),
-
Completes a request to Area
Counsel for the assistance of a
senior trial attorney, and
-
Periodically reviews the
applicability of injunctive relief
under IRC section 7408.
- These
penalty assertion procedures do not
apply to grand jury investigations.
20.1.6.5.6.1 (07-08-1999)
Examination Guidelines
-
Letter 1844 (AO), Notice of
Commencement of IRC section 6700
Examination, is sent to the
promoter.
- The
agent and the attorney prepare a
document request in the format
suitable for a summons. (See IRM
4.11.9, Examining Officers Guide.)
The promoter is required to make the
requested documents available within
10 days. (See Rev. Proc. 83–78
1983–2 C.B. 595.)
-
Failing that, a summons should
be issued expeditiously while
the examination continues.
-
If the summons must be enforced
by court action, Revenue Agents
cannot grant an extension of
time to respond. Contempt
changes may be filed by the
Government for any failure to
respond. (See IRC section 982
for guidance concerning the
promoter's admittance of
foreign-based documentation
following the failure to
respond.)
-
Since the IRC section 6700 penalty
is considered a tax, an examination
can proceed on the preparer's
individual return at the same time.
This requires two separate and
distinct document requests. The same
agent should control both cases and
maintain a carefully documented
history of all actions and
responses.
- The
agent may open examinations on other
abusive tax shelters/promotions with
the group manager's approval, and
follow up with notification to the
assigned to the area counsel
attorney and the Committee.
-
Consideration of the IRC section
7408 injunction would only cause the
IRC section 6700 case to be
suspended if requested by the
Department of Justice or there is a
criminal investigation.
20.1.6.5.6.2 (07-08-1999)
Conclusion of an IRC Section 6700
Examination
- The
agent and the attorney will jointly
determine if the following actions
are appropriate:
-
Assessment of the penalty,
-
Issuance of pre-filing
notification letters,
-
A request for injunctive relief
should be sought, and
-
A referral to criminal
investigation should be made due
to an indication of fraud.
- The
promoter should be offered a closing
conference and the opportunity to
present any arguments or evidence.
No communication regarding the
determination of the case should be
presented at the meeting. A copy of
the letter offering the conference
will be kept in the file.
-
Written approval of the Area
Director is needed if the penalty
will be asserted.
- When
the penalty will be asserted the
case file will include:
-
Form 4549, Revenue Agent Report,
-
Form 886A, Explanation of Items,
including the penalty
calculation.
-
Form 8278, Computation and
Assessment of Miscellaneous
Penalties
-
Form 4665, Report Transmittal.
-
F–4665 will indicate whether or not:
-
The key case is subject to
TEFRA,
-
The subsequent year will be
examined, and
-
Investors are required to file
Form 8271, Investor Reporting of
Tax Shelter Registration Number.
-
Letter 1866, IRC section 6700
Discontinuance Letter, is sent to
the promoter if the penalty will not
be asserted.
20.1.6.5.6.3 (07-08-1999)
Investor Penalties
- The
accuracy-related penalties under IRC
section 6662 can be applied to the
individual returns of the investors
if the criteria apply. Once the
penalty is assessed and Pre-filing
Notification Letters have been sent
to the investors, the penalty can
only be abated with the concurrence
of Area Counsel.
- If
the investor is a witness in either
an IRS grand jury investigation or
an administrative criminal
investigation, advise Criminal
Investigation before assessing the
penalty.
20.1.6.5.6.4 (07-08-1999)
Pre-filing Notification Letters
-
After Area Director's approval, the
letter shown in Exhibit 20.1.6–6
will be sent.
- PFN
letters will not be sent to the
investors when a determination is
made after July 15 of the subsequent
year. Instead, see procedures in
Rev. Proc. 84–84, 1984–2 C.B. 782.
- The
area office forwards to the service
center where the investor filed, the
following items:
-
A list of all PFN letters,
-
Each investor's PFN,
-
The Area Director's letter of
approval,
-
The pro forma RAR that relates
to each of the investor's
returns, and
-
Any RARs for subsequent years.
-
Taxpayers sent PFN letters will be
identified and the portion of any
credits relating to the abusive tax
shelter will be disallowed. If this
proportion cannot be determined, all
credits will be disallowed. (
Note: Non-TEFRA
entities are all entities except
those described in IRC section 6221
and 6241.)
-
Service Center Pre-filing
Coordinators are responsible for
administering the PFN program and
monitoring its effectiveness.
20.1.6.5.7 (07-08-1999)
Appeal Rights
- See
IRM 20.1.6.1.3 above.
20.1.6.5.7.1 (07-08-1999)
Statute of Limitations
-
There is no statute of limitations
on assessment with respect to the
promoter penalty imposed by IRC
section 6700.
20.1.6.5.8 (07-08-1999)
Referral to the Director of Practice
20.1.6.5.9 (07-08-1999)
Definitions
- See
IRM 20.6.1.9 above for definition of
terms.
20.1.6.6
(07-08-1999)
Penalties for Aiding and Abetting—IRC
Section 6701—Legislative Overview
- The Tax
Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of
1982 (TEFRA) added IRC section 6701 to
the Code to penalize persons who
knowingly aid and abet in the
understatement of the tax liability of
another person. See Exhibit 20.1.6–7.
The Tax Reform Act of 1984 included the
IRC section 6701 penalty under the
provisions of IRC section 7408
permitting the U.S. to seek injunctive
relief barring a person aiding and
abetting others in understating tax
liabilities from further engaging in
such activity.
- The
Omnibus Budget and Reconciliation Act of
1989 (OBRA 89) expanded the scope of the
penalty to individuals "who have reason
to know" that they are aiding or
abetting in the understatement of a tax
liability of another person.
-
After December 31, 1989, the penalty
has been broadened to cover the
person who only has reason to
believe that the document will be
used in connection with a material
matter arising under the tax laws.
-
Prior to amendment, the penalty
required that the person have actual
knowledge that the document would be
used in connection with a material
matter arising under the tax laws.
In addition, OBRA '89 coordinated
this penalty with IRC sections 6694
and 6700. (See IRM 20.6.6.1 below.)
20.1.6.6.1 (07-08-1999)
When the Penalty Applies
- IRC
section 6701(a) imposes a $1,000
penalty ($10,000 if the prohibited
conduct relates to a corporation's tax
return) for aiding or assisting in the
understatement of tax. The penalty is
imposed on a person who:
-
Aids or assists in, procures or
advises with respect to, the
preparation or presentation of any
portion of a return, affidavit,
claim or other document (pre 89);
-
Knows (or has reason to know) that
such portion will be used in
connection with any material
matter arising under the internal
revenue laws; and
-
Knows that such portion (if used)
would result in an understatement
of another person's tax liability.
-
Activities Subject to the Penalty. The
key words in the penalty are
"document," "knows," and
"understatement." For the penalty to
be imposed, the person penalized must
be implicated in the preparation or
presentation of a document some
portion of which he or she knows or
has reason to know will be used in
connection with a material matter
arising under the tax laws and knows
that such position would result in an
understatement of tax liability if so
used.
- In
general, targets of the penalty
are tax counselors who advise
clients to take unsupported filing
positions or to file false or
fraudulent returns.
-
The authors of legal opinions made
available to promoters of tax
shelters are another target of the
penalty. A carefully fabricated
legal opinion may lend credence to
an abusive tax shelter. The
penalty may be imposed even if the
opinion does not contain any false
advice if the writer knows that
the opinion is based on inaccurate
assumptions and/or knows of other
facts which render the legal
advice false.
-
The penalty can be imposed for
gratuitous advice or assistance in
preparing any document. Unlike the
IRC section 6700 penalty, the
person cannot lower the penalty by
establishing the amount of gross
income derived from the actions.
- In
order to aid in the understatement
of another's tax, it is not
necessary to actually prepare the
tax return or document that leads
to the understatement. A person
who controls the activities of
subordinates and either orders the
subordinate to act, or does not
prevent their participation in
actions that person knows will
produce an understatement is
subject to the penalty under IRC
section 6701.
- Aid,
Assist, Procure, or Advise.
-
The term "procures" in the statute
includes ordering (or otherwise
causing) a subordinate to do an
act subject to the penalty. It
also includes knowing of, and not
attempting to prevent,
participation by a subordinate in
such an act. "Subordinate" means
any other person (whether or not a
director, officer, employee, or
agent of the taxpayer involved)
over whose activities the person
has direction, supervision or
control. The Senate Report adds
that such direction, etc., must be
"direct and immediate." Where a
subordinate is directed or
expected, as a condition of
retaining his position, to
participate in the prohibited
activity by a person who directs,
supervises, or controls such
subordinate, the latter person is
the one potentially subject to the
penalty.
-
The term "advises" includes
actions of independent contractors
such as lawyers and accountants
who counsel a particular course of
action.
-
Mechanical Assistance. A person
furnishing typing, reproduction,
or other mechanical assistance
with respect to a document is not
to be considered as having aided
or assisted in the preparation of
the document for purposes of the
statute solely by reason of such
assistance.
- The
Actor's Requisite Knowledge.
-
For activities occurring before
January 1, 1990, the actor must
know that a document (the
preparation or presentation of
which he or she was in some way
instrumental) will be used in
connection with a material matter
arising under the tax laws and
will result in an understatement
of tax liability. For example, if
an individual assists another in
procuring a forged birth
certificate, he will not be liable
for the penalty unless he knows
that the birth certificate will be
used for a tax matter, such as to
obtain a benefit under the Code
and that the use of such benefit
will result in an understatement
of tax.
-
For activities occurring after
December 31, 1989, the actor can
be held liable for the penalty if
he or she knows or has reason to
believe that the document will be
used in connection with any
material matter arising under the
tax laws. However, the statute
still requires that the actor have
actual knowledge that the document
will result in an understatement
of tax liability.
-
Congressional Intent in Enacting the
Provision.
- A
tax advisor would not be subject
to this penalty for suggesting to
a client an aggressive but
supportable filing position even
though that position was later
rejected by the courts and even
though the client was subjected to
the substantial understatement
penalty. However, if the advisor
suggested a position which he or
she knew could not be supported on
any reasonable basis under the
law, the penalty would apply.
-
The Senate Report also states that
no person will be subject to the
penalty unless they are "directly
involved in aiding or assisting in
the preparation of a false or
fraudulent document under the tax
laws." Thus, the preparation of a
correct schedule by a preparer to
be incorporated in a return will
not expose the preparer of the
schedule to a penalty even though
the preparer is aware other
portions of the return may be
fraudulent.
- Single
Penalty per Taxpayer Per Period.
- If
a penalty is imposed on a person
with respect to a federal tax
document, no penalty shall be
imposed under IRC section 6701 on
such person with respect to any
other federal tax document
relating solely to the same
taxpayer and the same taxable
period, or, if there is no taxable
period, the same taxable event.
If, however, such other federal
tax document also related to
another taxpayer or another
taxable period or taxable event, a
second penalty may be imposed
under IRC section 6701 with
respect to such other federal tax
document.
- A
husband and wife who make a joint
return of income tax are
considered to be the same taxpayer
for the taxable year to which such
return relates.
-
Example:
Someone who assists two taxpayers
in preparing false documents would
be liable for a $2,000 penalty
whereas the penalty would be only
$1,000 if he had advised in the
preparation of two false documents
for the same taxpayer. Similarly,
an advisor who prepares a false
partnership return and then false
K–1s for 10 individual partners
would be subject to a $10,000
penalty.
20.1.6.6.2 (07-08-1999)
Who Asserts the Penalty
- Since
the government has the burden of proof
with respect to this penalty, it can
be assessed only by employees who have
the requisite knowledge of the facts
giving rise to the penalty. Therefore,
this penalty normally will be assessed
by revenue agents and office auditors
at an IRS area office as a result of
an examination of a tax return or
document or in connection with a tax
shelter registration examination.
20.1.6.6.3 (07-08-1999)
How to Identify, Develop, and Assert
the Penalty: Investigative
Responsibilities
-
Persons subject to penalty under IRC
section 6701 will usually be
identified by examiners through the
examination process or by service
center correspondence examinations in
which a pattern (or suspected pattern)
was evident. If a penalty under IRC
section 6701 might be appropriate, the
examiner should provide relevant
information to the Area 6700/7408
Coordinator to determine if a project
is warranted.
- When
the Area 6700/7408 Coordinator reviews
a tax plan or arrangement which if
used by a taxpayer could result in the
understatement of tax liability an IRC
section 6701 lead is established.
There are two types of investigations:
- A
limited investigation involving a
small number of tax returns
(Committee approval not required),
or
- An
extensive investigation involving
a large number of tax returns, and
consideration of program action in
IRM 20.1.6.1.6 above or injunctive
relief under IRC sections 7407 or
7408.
- The
Area 6700/7408 Coordinator will:
-
Ensure that each IRC section 6701
lead is assigned to a revenue
agent for investigation,
-
Recommend IRC section 6701
investigations and injunction
actions under IRC sections 7407 or
7408 for approval by the
Committee,
-
Approve and monitor limited
investigations.
- The
revenue agent assigned an IRC section
6701 lead will:
-
Estimate the number of taxpayers
and years involved through
coordination with the RPC who
obtains a return preparer listing,
-
Determine the tax loss to the
government,
-
Calculate the penalty amount,
-
Recommend to the Area 6700/7408
Coordinator whether an in-depth
investigation is warranted.
- Form
2848, Power of Attorney (POA), may be
used to authorize representation. (See
104 on POAs.) The POA will be reviewed
for purposes of the investigation. A
copy is maintained in the case file
and is not submitted to the service
center Centralized Authorization File.
20.1.6.6.3.1 (07-08-1999)
Investigation Procedures
-
Procedures for extensive
investigations after Committee
approval and assignment to a revenue
agent will parallel IRC section 6700
guidelines:
-
The revenue agent meets with the
coordinating attorney from Area
Counsel, maintains a summary
document of agreed-upon actions,
and records quarterly meetings
that also include the respective
managers from Examination and
Counsel. (See Exhibit 20.1.6–2.)
When Criminal Investigation is
involved, the special agent and
the related manager also attend
quarterly meetings.
-
The person under investigation
will be notified in writing at a
time determined by the revenue
agent and the attorney. (See
Exhibit 20.1.6–3.) Information
from third parties may be
collected before notification.
-
If the person is under a
criminal investigation, the
special agent assigned the case
will issue the person a
statement of rights before an
interview with the revenue
agent. In order to avoid
adversely affecting the criminal
investigation, all direct
contact with the person will be
coordinated with the special
agent.
-
The revenue agent will secure
related tax returns and
transcripts and obtain a
Treasury Enforcement
Communications System (TECS)
inquiry report.
-
After obtaining relevant
background information on the
person under investigation
(including any record of prior
civil or criminal actions taken)
the revenue agent will meet with
the person and carefully develop
and document all factors with
respect to the person's position
and the defense of it.
-
The revenue agent prepares a
report of proposed adjustments
and, with the assigned attorney,
conducts a final meeting with
the person under investigation.
After this meeting, based upon
the recommendation of the
attorney and the revenue agent,
a decision will be made
regarding whether the penalty
should be assessed. A penalty
assessment file is sent to the
Area Director for approval
and/or to authorize an
injunction under IRC section
7408.
-
The revenue agent secures a copy
of the assessment documentation
from Case Processing Staff for
the administrative file.
-
Limited investigations not requiring
Committee approval will be cleared
through Area Counsel before the
penalty is assessed.
20.1.6.6.3.2 (07-08-1999)
Procedures for Developing IRC
Section 6701 Cases
- The
following factors, although not all
inclusive, apply to the person under
investigation in IRC section 6701
cases. These factors should be
developed to the extent applicable:
-
Education level, degrees,
certifications (CPA, LLM in
taxation, MBA, etc.);
-
Expertise in accounting and tax
law (evidence by
seminars/courses taken or
given);
-
Occupation and relevant work
experience (as an accountant,
bookkeeper, tax advisor, etc.);
- The
following factors pertain to the
evidence on facts and circumstances
and must be fully developed. This is
information that establishes:
-
The assistance or advice upon
which the penalty is based (who,
when, where, how, and form of
assistance or advice);
-
Any documents prepared by the
person which reflect the advice
given;
-
How the advice or assistance
affected the taxpayer's tax
liability; (How was it reflected
on the tax return? What actions
did the taxpayer take to change
the liability based on the
advice?)
-
How the advice or assistance
would create an understatement
of tax;
-
The relationship between the
person and the taxpayer;
(Although not required to assess
the IRC section 6701 penalty,
was the person compensated for
the advice given? Is the person
an employee of the taxpayer or
an independent contractor?)
-
How the person knew or should
have known that the advice would
be used in connection with a
material matter arising under
the tax laws;
-
How the person knew that the
advice would cause an
understatement of tax, e.g.,
what facts were considered by
the person making the advice.
- The
following factors relate to tax
shelter advisors, brokers, dealers,
organizers, promoters, and other
personnel (referred to as promoters)
involved in organizing or promoting
a tax plan or arrangement which
results in the understatement of the
tax liability of another person. The
revenue agent will:
-
Complete a detailed overview of
the financial structure and
organization of the scheme,
shelter, plan, or arrangement
(referred to as plans). The
details of the financial
transactions and how tax
liabilities would be reduced.
-
Determine the promoter's
relationship to the plan: Did
the promoter participate in
organizing the plan? How much
control did the promoter have in
the promotion and organization
of the plan?
-
Determine the relationship of
the sales personnel to the
promoter: 1.) What instructions
were given by the promoter?
2.) How much control was
exercised by the promoter?
3.) Did sales personnel make
independent representations?
-
Determine how commissions were
earned and paid: 1.) Did the
promoter receive a commission
from each taxpayer or investor?
2.) If so, how much?
-
Investigate the details of the
investor's acquisitions: 1.) How
was the transaction reported on
the return? 2.) Did the
transaction result in an
underpayment on each return?
3.) If so, how much?
-
Determine the tax benefits
promised by the
promoter: 1.) How were the
benefits presented? 2.) Who
received the tax reporting
information? 3.) Who determined
how the transaction was
reported?
-
Review all documentation
furnished to the
investor: 1.) Who furnished the
information? 2.) Did the
promoter personally provide the
information and instruct the
preparers on its use?
-
Determine the relationship
between the promoter and each
taxpayer: 1.) If the promoter
was not the actual preparer, how
was the promoter liable for the
penalty? 2.) Was the promoter's
activity sufficient to support
the penalty?
-
Obtain evidence to establish
that the promoter knew the
document would result in an
understatement of each
participant's tax liability.
-
Gather information to establish
consistent treatment of all
promoters. State the type of
false documents prepared and how
these documents affected tax
returns. Retain copies.
-
Determine whether the promoter
had a reasonable basis for the
position taken: what authority,
if any, supports the promoter's
position?
-
Reference federal court
decisions at all levels,
congressional records, Tax Court
decisions, regulations, public
and private rulings, notices,
and other Service publications
and written documentation to
support the application of the
penalty.
- The
IRC section 6701 penalty should be
imposed only after review of the
person under investigation, the
surrounding circumstances, and the
reasons for the position taken. This
position must be contrary to clear
authority and without reasonable
basis.
20.1.6.6.3.3 (07-08-1999)
Evidence Supporting the
Government's Burden of Proof
- The
penalty under IRC section 6701 may
be imposed on a broad range of
persons. When a tax return preparer
is involved, either IRC section
6694(b) or 6701 could apply.
-
The government's burden of proof
under IRC section 6694(b) and
6701 is not sustained by the
mere fact of unreported income
or overstated credits and
deductions.
-
The focus is on the information
that establishes the knowledge,
willfulness, or recklessness of
the preparer, i.e., information
conveyed by the taxpayer to the
preparer, information known or
reasonably known by the
preparer, the inquiries or
statements directed by the
preparer to the taxpayer.
-
For example, if the preparer
fabricates deductions (without
the taxpayer's knowledge), the
preparer could be liable for a
penalty under IRC section
6694(b) or 6701 because of
willfully attempting to
understate the tax and because
of preparing a return based on
information which is known by
the preparer to result in an
understatement of the taxpayer's
tax liabilities.
- Even
though a preparer may in good faith
rely on the taxpayer to provide
accurate information, the preparer
may not ignore the implications of
such information and must make
reasonable inquiries when
information furnished appears to be
incorrect or incomplete. It must be
shown that the preparer failed to
make any reasonable inquiry under
circumstances required by rule or
regulation, and a deliberate act of
omission prevails.
- The
evidence must prove each of the
three elements defined in IRM
20.1.6.6.2 above. In addition, the
evidence should show the amount of
understatement on each return
related to IRC section 6701
activity. Examples of evidence to be
collected include, but are not
limited to:
-
Tax returns or other documents
which were prepared by the
person under investigation.
Although copies may be used
during the investigation,
originals or certified copies
will be needed for introduction
in court.
-
Affidavits taken from taxpayers
whose federal tax returns were
prepared by the person under
investigation. These affidavits
should define the items falsely
reported on the filed return as
well as any other preparer
violations. The affidavits are
used for report purposes but the
individuals must be available to
testify if the case goes to
court. (See IRM 20.1.6.1.7
above, Affidavits)
-
Computation of loss to the
government due to the
understatement of tax
attributable to the return
preparer.
-
False receipts or other
documents to establish the
involvement of the individual
under investigation in aiding or
assisting in the filing of false
documents specified in IRC
section 6701.
-
Affidavits taken from third
parties who can testify as to
the preparer's tax knowledge and
personal responsibility in the
preparation of the tax returns
or other factors bearing on the
investigation.
20.1.6.6.4 (07-08-1999)
Coordination with Other Penalties
- The
penalty under IRC section 6701 is not
imposed on a person with respect to a
federal tax document if a penalty with
respect to such document has been
assessed on such person under IRC
section 6694, relating to income tax
return preparers. The penalty may be
imposed, however, with respect to any
other federal tax document for which
the penalty under IRC section 6694 has
not been assessed, even though the
document relates to the same taxpayer
and taxable year as a document with
respect to which the penalty under IRC
section 6694 has been assessed. (See
IRM 20.1.6.3.3.)
- After
December 31, 1989, a penalty under IRC
section 6701 may not be applied to the
same activities which result in the
application of a penalty under IRC
section 6700. Therefore, if a promoter
develops promotional materials such as
a prospectus and other documents which
explain the promotion and those
documents are used as the evidence
supporting a penalty under IRC section
6700 for organizing and promoting an
abusive tax shelter, a penalty under
IRC section 6701 will not be assessed
for those same documents. However, if
the same promoter prepares a
partnership tax return relating to the
same tax plan or arrangement, a
penalty can be assessed under IRC
section 6701 for each schedule K–1 if
an understatement of tax liability is
reported on the investor's federal tax
returns.
20.1.6.6.5 (07-08-1999)
Examples of IRC Section 6701
Activity
-
Example 1:
A tax advisor would not be subject to
the penalty for suggesting an
aggressive but supportable filing
position to a client even though that
position was later rejected by the
courts and even though the client was
subjected to the substantial
understatement penalty.
-
Example 2:
However, if the tax advisor suggested
a position which he or she knew could
not be reasonably supported by statute
or regulation, and the advisor
prepared (or assisted in the
preparation of) a document for the
underlying tax return reflecting that
insupportable position, the penalty
could apply.
-
Thus, if a person prepares a
return (or a schedule or other
portion of a return) for a client
reflecting a deduction of an
amount the preparer knows is not
deductible, the preparer could be
subject to the penalty.
-
However, if a person prepares a
schedule or other portion of a
return which portion reflects
positions which are reasonably
supported by rules or regulations,
the person will not be subject to
an IRC section 6701 penalty even
if other portions of the return
are erroneous or fraudulent.
-
Example 3:
Taxpayer B was given a winning horse
race ticket at a race course by
taxpayer A, the ticket owner. The race
course, using information supplied by
Taxpayer B, prepared a Form 1099 in
Taxpayer B's name. Taxpayer B received
the proceeds from the winning ticket
and returned the proceeds to Taxpayer
A for a 6 percent fee.
-
Taxpayer B is a person who has
aided, assisted in the preparation
of, or procured a document (the
Form 1099) that Taxpayer B knows,
or has reason to know, will be
used in connection with material
matters under the Internal Revenue
laws.
-
Taxpayer B knows that, if used,
the document would result in an
understatement of Taxpayer A's
income tax liability. Thus,
Taxpayer B is liable for the IRC
section 6701 penalty.
-
Example 4:
Mr. C, an accountant, prepared a 1983
return for Taxpayer D, a client. Mr. C
knowingly overstated D's expenses on
the return, thereby creating a NOL for
the year. Mr. C prepared amended
returns for Taxpayer D for 1980, 1981,
and 1982, claiming refunds for those
years based on the 1983 NOL carryback.
The carryback was not exhausted in
1982. Mr. E, another accountant,
prepared Taxpayer D's 1984 return
using the information presented to Mr.
E by Taxpayer D, including copies of
the document prepared by Mr. C. Mr. E
is unaware of the overstatement of
expenses by Mr. C and deducted the
remaining unused NOL on Taxpayer D's
1984 return.
-
Mr. C is liable for four separate
IRC section 6701 penalties for his
role in preparing Taxpayer D's
1980, 1981, 1982, and 1983
returns, which Mr. C knew, or had
reason to know would result in
understatements of Taxpayer's D's
1980, 1981, 1982, and 1983 federal
income tax liabilities.
-
Mr. E, however, was unaware of the
overstatement of expenses on the
1983 return and is unaware of the
understatement of tax liability on
the 1984 return. Thus, Mr. E is
not liable for a section 6701
penalty.
-
Example 5:
On January 15, 1983, A, an individual,
offers to donate a painting to museum
X. B, the curator of the museum,
agrees to accept the painting. B
offers to backdate a receipt for the
donation to December 30, 1982. B knows
that the receipt will be used to
substantiate A's charitable deduction.
A uses the backdated receipt to claim
a charitable deduction for 1982.
- B
has aided in the preparation of a
federal tax document knowing that
it will be used in connection with
a material tax matter and that it
will result in an understatement
of tax.
-
Thus, B is liable for the IRC
section 6701 penalty.
-
Example 6:
Taxpayer F retains Mr. G, an
appraiser, to appraise rare books that
she wishes to donate to a university.
Mrs. F tells Mr. G that she needs the
appraisal to substantiate a charitable
contribution deduction for federal
income tax purposes. Mr. G knows that
the fair market value of the books may
be any amount between $50,000 and
$75,000. Mr. G offers to provide Mrs.
F an appraisal, for a fee, indicating
the books are worth $100,000. Mr. G
indicates to Mrs. F that if the IRS
challenges the valuation, the
appraisal of $100,000 can be used to
negotiate a fair market value of
$75,000.
-
Mrs. F agrees to pay the fee for
the appraisal indicating the books
are worth $100,000, and Mr. G
prepares the appraisal.
-
Mr. G has aided in the preparation
of a document knowing that it will
be used in connection with a
material tax matter and that it
will result in the understatement
of tax liability. Thus, G is
liable for the IRC section 6701
penalty.
-
Example 7:
Mrs. H, an accountant, overstates the
value of depreciable property on an
estate tax return. Mrs. H knows there
is no reasonable basis for the
valuation. Mrs. H also knows that the
valuation claimed on the estate tax
return will not understate the tax
liability of the estate because of the
application of the unified credit.
Mrs. H, however, intends that the
value claimed on the return will be
used by the beneficiary of the estate
in computing depreciation deductions.
Mrs. H has aided in the preparation of
a tax document and knows that the
estate tax return will result in an
understatement of the tax liability of
the beneficiary. The IRC section 6701
penalty therefore applies.
-
Example 8:
Mr. A, an attorney, knowingly
understates an item of partnership
income in preparing a partnership
return for calendar year 1983. Mr. A
prepares and transmits to the partners
Schedules K–1 for the 10 individual
partners for the same calendar year
reflecting the understated income. Mr.
A is subject to ten separate $1,000
IRC section 6701 penalties for his
preparation of ten Schedule K–1s which
Mr. A knew would, if used, result in
understatements of the federal tax
liabilities of the ten partners on
their federal income tax returns. Mr.
A will not be subject to an eleventh
penalty in connection with the
partnership return itself, since the
partnership itself is not liable for
income tax and the only
understatements of tax liability are
the understatements of tax liability
on the ten partners' individual
returns.
-
Example 9:
Mrs. B, an officer of an S corporation
under section 1361(a)(1), prepares the
corporation's tax return for calendar
year 1983. Mrs. B intentionally
understates the corporation's net
capital gain for the taxable year,
resulting in an understatement of the
corporation's tax liability under
section 1374. Mrs. B also prepares
Schedules K–1 for the individual
shareholders for the same calendar
year reflecting the understated
capital gain. Mrs. B is subject to a
$10,000 penalty for her aid in the
preparation of the small business
corporation return and a $1,000
penalty for each Schedule K–1
prepared.
Note:
If
Mrs. B intentionally understated
operating income rather than net
capital gains, Mrs. B is subject to
a $1,000 penalty for each Schedule
K–1 prepared, but is not subject to
a penalty for the S corporation
return since under these facts the S
corporation is not subject to tax.
-
Example 10:
Mrs. C, an accountant, prepares false
income and gift tax returns for client
Mr. D. Each of the returns is prepared
for calendar year 1983. The calendar
year 1983, however, relates to a
period for which different taxes are
imposed. Thus, there are two taxable
periods for purposes of application of
the penalty under IRC section 6701:
the calendar year 1983 which is the
period for which the income tax is
imposed, and the calendar year 1983
which is the period for which the gift
tax is imposed. Mrs. C is subject to a
penalty of $2,000.
20.1.6.6.6 (07-08-1999)
Appeal Rights
- See
IRM 20.1.6.1.3 above.
20.1.6.6.7 (07-08-1999)
Statute of Limitations on Assessment
- There
is no statute of limitation on
assessment of penalties under IRC
section 6701 because the penalty does
not depend on the filing of a return.
20.1.6.6.8 (07-08-1999)
Director of Practice
- See
IRM 20.1.6.2 above, Director of
Practice.
20.1.6.6.9 (07-08-1999)
Definitions
- See
IRM 20.1.6.1.10 above for definition
of terms used.
20.1.6.7
(07-08-1999)
Penalty for Unauthorized Preparer
Disclosure or Use—IRC Section
6713—Legislative Overview
- The
penalty for unauthorized preparer
disclosure or improper use was enacted
as IRC section 6712 as part of the
Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act
of 1988 (P.L. 100–647). See Exhibit
20.1.6–7. In 1989, this provision was
renumbered IRC section 6713. It provides
a penalty of $250.00 for each
unauthorized disclosure or use of
information connected with a tax return
or the preparation of a tax return. The
penalty may be asserted against a tax
return preparer or any person providing
services in connection with the
preparation of a return.
20.1.6.7.1 (07-08-1999)
Asserting the Penalty
-
Revenue Agents and Tax Auditors in
Area Examination assert the penalty.
- If
disclosure or use of return or return
related information was made pursuant
to court order or one of the
provisions of the Code that permits
disclosure, then the penalty will not
be asserted.
- If any
person prepares a return for
compensation or provides services in
connection with the preparation of the
return, and knowingly or recklessly
discloses or uses return information,
the examiner should consider the
criminal penalty under IRC section
7216.
20.1.6.7.2 (07-08-1999)
Computing the Penalty
- For
each unauthorized disclosure or use of
return information a penalty of
$250.00 may be asserted. The total
amount cannot exceed $10,000 per
person per calendar year.
20.1.6.7.3 (07-08-1999)
Coordination with Other Penalties
- The
IRC section 6713 penalty can be
asserted in conjunction with any other
preparer penalties.
20.1.6.7.4 (07-08-1999)
Appeal Rights
- See
IRM 20.1.6.1.4 above.
20.1.6.7.5 (07-08-1999)
Statute of Limitations
- There
is no statute of limitations for this
penalty.
20.1.6.7.6 (07-08-1999)
Definitions
- See
IRM 20.1.6.1.9 above for definition of
terms.
20.1.6.8
(07-08-1999)
Action to Enjoin Preparers to
Promoters—IRC Section 7407 and
7408—Legislative Overview
- Under
IRC section 7407 the Service has the
power to seek an injunction prohibiting
an income tax preparer from engaging in
certain practices. See Exhibit 20.1.6–7.
The Service may bring a civil action in
the U.S. District Court for the area of
- The
return preparer's residence,
- The
return preparer's principal place of
business, or
- The
residence of the taxpayer with
respect to whose return the action
arises.
- If the
court finds that the income tax return
preparer has engaged in one or more of
the enumerated practices, it may enjoin
him or her from further engaging in such
conduct. If the court finds that the
return preparer has continually or
repeatedly engaged in those practices,
it may enjoin him or her from acting as
an income tax return preparer. (The
court's jurisdiction in this case may be
exercised separate and apart from any
other action brought by the U.S. against
the income tax return preparer or any
taxpayer.)
- Income
tax return preparer practices that may
cause the Service to initiate injunctive
action:
-
Conduct subject to IRC sections 6694
and 6695 penalties;
-
Conduct subject to criminal
penalties;
-
Misrepresentation of the return
preparer's eligibility to practice
before the Service, or his or her
experience and education as an
income tax return preparer;
-
Guarantee of payment of a tax refund
or of allowance of a tax credit;
-
Other fraudulent or deceptive
conduct that substantially
interferes with proper
administration of the Internal
Revenue laws.
-
Bond to Stay Injunction
(IRC section 7407). Prior to January 1,
1990, an income tax return preparer
could prevent the Service from beginning
or pursuing an injunctive action with
respect to conduct subject to IRC
sections 6694 and 6695 penalties by
filing and maintaining with the district
office of his residence or principal
place of business, a bond of $50,000 as
surety for payment of the IRC sections
6694 and 6695 penalties that might be
assessed. The return preparer did not
need to continue the bond after paying
the assessed penalties that gave rise to
the injunctive action. In 1989, Congress
repealed this provision because it
believed that return preparers should
not be able to prevent judicial
resolution of the issue of whether the
return preparer had engaged in
prohibited conduct. This repeal is
effective with respect to actions
commenced after December 31, 1989.
- The
Committee Reports for the Tax Reform Act
of 1976 (which enacted IRC section 7407)
indicate that injunctive relief sought
by the Service must be commensurate with
the conduct which led to the seeking of
the injunction. For example, if an
income tax return preparer, who is only
experienced in preparing individual
returns, overstates his qualifications
as a preparer by claiming expertise in
the preparation of corporate returns, it
was anticipated that any injunction
would be directed toward the
misrepresentation itself or the
preparation of corporate returns and not
toward preventing the preparer from
preparing any returns at all.
Furthermore, if some of an employer's
employee-preparers have engaged in
conduct leading to a request for an
injunction against the further
preparation of returns, any injunction
is to be sought only against those
preparers and not the employer (or other
employees), unless the employer (or
other employees) is actively involved in
the improper conduct.
-
Action to Enjoin Promoters of Abusive
Tax Shelter, etc.
A civil action may be brought under IRC
section 7408 to enjoin further conduct
subject to IRC section 6700 or 6701. The
court action can be brought in the U.S.
district court for the district in which
the individual resides, has his
principal business, or has engaged in
prohibited conduct.
- The
court may grant injunctive relief
against any person if it finds:
- That
the person has engaged in any
conduct subject to the penalty for
organizing or selling abusive tax
shelters under IRC section 6700, or
- That
the person has engaged in aiding and
abetting tax understatements under
IRC section 6701,
-
Injunctive relief is appropriate to
prevent recurrence of such conduct.
20.1.6.8.1 (07-08-1999)
Action on Injunctions: Seeking an
Injunction
- Any
examiner conducting an investigation
under IRC sections 6694, 6695, 6700,
or 6701 will consider whether an
injunction should be sought under IRC
sections 7407 or 7408. In addition, an
injunction may be sought by an
examiner to whom an investigation is
assigned for activities specified in
IRC section 7407.
20.1.6.8.1.1 (07-08-1999)
Identifying Persons Subject to an
Injunction
-
Service personnel who become aware
of income tax return preparers
engaged in activities identified in
IRC section 7407(b)(1)(A) through
(D) will notify the Area 6700/7408
Coordinator in writing of the facts
and circumstances.
20.1.6.8.1.2 (07-08-1999)
Initiating an Investigation under
IRC Sections 7407/7408
- An
investigation under IRC sections
7407/7409 will be conducted in the
same fashion as an investigation
under IRC section 6700 and 6701.
20.1.6.8.1.3 (07-08-1999)
Approval to Seek An Injunction
- If
the Revenue Agent and Area Counsel
Attorney conclude that an IRC
section 7407/7408 referral is
appropriate, a recommendation for
injunction will be forwarded to the
Area 6700/7408 Committee for
approval. If approved by the Area
6700/7408 Committee, the
recommendation will be submitted to
the Area Director for final
approval. If approved by the Area
Director, the case file will be
submitted to Area Counsel for
referral to the Department of
Justice. The following procedures
should be adopted with respect to
submitting these cases:
-
A copy of the Revenue Agent
Report (RAR) will be submitted
with the IRC section 7407/7408
administrative file.
-
The RAR will be cross referenced
to the exhibits and the exhibits
numbered correspondingly.
-
Revenue Agents should retain
complete copies of the documents
submitted in order to facilitate
telephone discussions with the
trial attorneys.
-
When video or audio tapes are
forwarded as evidence, a
transcript should be forwarded
with the tape.
- When
an injunction is issued, copies of
the court order and the asserted
opinion will be sent to the area in
which the subject promoters reside.
Area personnel will then take
appropriate action on the IRC
section 6700/6701 case.
20.1.6.8.2 (07-08-1999)
Coordination with Other Penalties
- The
injunction authorized under IRC
section 7407 is coordinated with civil
penalties under IRC sections 6694 and
6695 and criminal tax provisions. In
addition, IRC section 7407 can be used
in conjunction with IRC section 7408,
if appropriate.
- The
injunction authorized under IRC
section 7408 is coordinated with civil
penalties under IRC section 6700 and
6701. In addition, IRC section 7408
can be used in conjunction with IRC
section 7407, if appropriate.
- In
addition, an injunction may be sought
without regard to whether penalties
have been or may be assessed against
any income tax return preparer.
20.1.6.8.3 (07-08-1999)
Statute of Limitations
- The
Code does not explicitly provide any
limitation period for seeking an
injunction under IRC sections 7407 and
7408.
20.1.6.8.4 (07-08-1999)
Director of Practice
20.1.6.8.5 (07-08-1999)
Definitions
- See
IRM 20.1.6.1.9 above.
Exhibit 20.1.6.8-1 (07-08-1999)
Forms Used in the Preparer Penalty
Case File
|
Form |
Description |
|
886–A |
Explanation of Items—Unagreed Case |
|
872–D |
Consent to Extend Time on
Assessment of Tax Return Preparer
Penalty |
|
895 |
Notice
of Statute Expiration |
|
2797 |
Referral Report for Potential
Fraud Case |
|
3198 |
Special Handling Notice—Annotate
"Preparer Penalty Case" in the
"Other" section |
|
3244–A |
Payment Posting Voucher |
|
4318 |
Examination Workpapers |
|
4318–A |
Continuation of Examination
Workpapers |
|
4665 |
Report
Transmittal—Unagreed Case |
|
4700 |
Examination Workpapers |
|
4700–A |
Form
4700 Supplemental |
|
5808 |
Return
Preparer Penalty Follow-up |
|
5809 |
Preparer Penalty Case Control Card |
|
5816 |
Report
of Income Tax Return Preparer
Penalty—A separate form is
required for each year/return. |
|
5838 |
Waiver
of Restrictions on Assessment and
Collection of Tax Return Preparer
Penalty—Unagreed Case |
|
6459 |
Return
Preparers Checklist—Prepare in
duplicate. Needs group manager
approval. |
|
8278 |
Computation and Assessment of
Miscellaneous
Penalties—Instructions on back of
form. A statute date must be
inserted in box 6 in order for
this penalty to be processed by
Case Processing Support. This form
is an assessment document,
therefore a case with a short
statute (as defined by the Area)
should follow district policy
concerning short statute
assessments. F–8278 is completed
for each penalty. |
|
8484 |
Penalty Information Report
(formerly: Referral to the
Director of Practice) |
Exhibit 20.1.6.8-2 (07-08-1999)
Examination and Area Counsel
Exhibit 20.1.6.8-3 (07-08-1999)
Section 6701 Pre-Assessment Letter
|
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE |
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY |
|
|
|
|
|
(ADDRESS) |
|
|
|
|
|
Person
to Contact: |
|
|
|
|
Date: |
Telephone Number: |
|
|
|
Mr.
Red Oak
624 Hackberry Lane
Frytown, Texas 77777 |
Appointment
Date:
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
Place: |
|
|
|
|
Dear
Mr. Oak: |
|
|
|
|
We
have reviewed certain materials
with respect to your preparation
of tax returns. We are considering
assessing penalties under section
6701 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Enclosed is an exhibit which
identifies the tax returns on
which the penalty is based and
calculated. |
|
|
|
|
You
may meet with the examiner at the
date, time and place scheduled
above to present facts or legal
arguments indicating such action
should not be taken. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sincerely yours, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Area
Director |
|
|
|
|
Enclosure |
|
Attachment to section 6701
Pre-Assessment Letter
Section 6701 Penalty Computation
Period: 1/1/87 to 8/15/89
|
|
|
|
|
|
TAXPAYER |
TAX
PERIOD |
PENALTY AMOUNT |
|
|
|
|
|
Taxpayer 1 |
1986 |
$1,000 |
|
Taxpayer 2 |
1986 |
$1,000 |
|
Taxpayer 3 |
1986 |
$1,000 |
|
Taxpayer 4 |
1986 |
$1,000 |
|
Taxpayer 5 |
1986 |
$1,000 |
|
Taxpayer 6 |
1986 |
$1,000 |
|
Taxpayer 7 |
1986 |
$1,000 |
|
Taxpayer 8 |
1986 |
$1,000 |
|
Taxpayer 9 |
1986 |
$1,000 |
|
Taxpayer 10 |
1987 |
$1,000 |
|
Taxpayer 11 |
1987 |
$1,000 |
|
Taxpayer 12 |
1987 |
$1,000 |
|
Taxpayer 13 |
1987 |
$1,000 |
|
Taxpayer 14 |
1987 |
$1,000 |
|
Taxpayer 15 |
1987 |
$1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Penalty |
|
$15,000 |
|
Amount |
|
|
Exhibit 20.1.6.8-4 (07-08-1999)
Penalty Reference Numbers
|
Reference: IRM 20.1.6.1.10 |
|
IRC
Section |
Title |
Reference Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6694 |
Understatement of Taxpayer's
Liability by Income Tax Return
Preparer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6694(a)—Penalty assessed prior to
1/1/90 |
622 |
|
|
—Penalty assessed after
12/31/89 |
645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6694(b)—Penalty assessed prior to
1/1/90 |
646 |
|
|
—Penalty assessed after
12/31/89 |
650 |
|
|
|
|
|
6695 |
Other
Assessable Penalties with Respect
to the Preparation of Income Tax
Returns for Other Persons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6695(a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) |
624 |
|
|
6695(f) |
626 |
|
|
|
|
|
6700 |
Promoting Abusive Tax Shelters,
Etc. |
628 |
|
|
|
|
|
6701 |
Penalties for Aiding and Abetting
Understatement of Tax Liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—Assessed against a promoter |
630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
—Assessed against a preparer |
631 |
|
|
|
|
|
6713 |
Disclosure or Use of Information
by Preparers of Returns |
633 |
Exhibit 20.1.6.8-5 (07-08-1999)
Legislative Overview
|
Reference: IRM 20.1.6.3 |
Code
Section |
Description |
Effective Date |
|
Pre-OBRA 1989:
|
|
6694(a) |
Understatement due to negligent or
intentional disregard of rules or
regulations ($100.00 per return
or refund) |
Documents prepared before 1–1–90 |
|
6694(b) |
Willful understatement of income
tax liability
($500.00 per return or claim for
refund) |
Documents prepared before 1–1–90 |
|
Post OBRA 1989:
|
|
6694(a) |
Understatement due to unrealistic
position ($250.00 per return or
claim for refund) |
Documents prepared after 12–31–89 |
|
6694(b) |
Willful attempt to understate an
income tax liability
or a reckless or intentional
disregard of the rules or
regulations ($1,000.00 per return
or claim for refund) |
Documents prepared after 12–31–89 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reference: IRM 20.1.6.3.1 and
20.1.6.3.2 |
|
Pre-OBRA 1989:
|
Code
Section |
Amount
of Penalty Per
Return/Claim for Refund
|
Description |
|
6694(a) |
$100.00 |
Understatement due to negligent or
intentional disregard of
rules/regulations |
|
6694(b) |
$500.00 |
Willful understatement |
|
Post OBRA 1989:
|
Code
Section |
Amount
of Penalty Per
Return/Claim for Refund
|
Description |
|
6694(a) |
$250.00 |
Understatement due to an
unrealistic position |
|
6694(b) |
$1000.00 |
Willful, reckless, or intentional
understatement |
|
Reference: 20.1.6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penalty Amount for: |
|
|
|
|
|
IRC
Section |
Penalty
Description |
Documents Before 1/01/90 |
Prepared After 12/31/89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6695(a) |
Failure to furnish copy of income
tax return or claim for refund to
taxpayer |
$25.00 |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6695(b) |
Failure of preparer to sign income
tax return or claim for refund |
$25.00 |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6695(c) |
Failure to furnish identifying
number of the preparer |
$25.00 |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6695(d) |
Failure to retain copy or list of
income tax returns or claims for
refund |
$50.00 |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6695(e)(1) |
Failure to file an information
return required under IRC section
6060 |
$100.00 |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6695(e)(2) |
Failure to set forth an item in
the return as required by IRC
section 6060 |
$5.00 |
$50.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6695(f) |
Endorsement or negotiation of a
taxpayer's refund check |
$500.00 |
$500.00 |
Exhibit 20.1.6.8-6 (07-08-1999)
Notification Letter
|
Reference: IRM 20.1.6.5.6.4 |
|
|
|
|
Letter |
Entity |
|
|
|
|
Letter
1842(DO), TEFRA Partner |
Sent
to all individual partners |
|
|
|
|
Notification Letter |
|
|
|
|
Letter
1843(DO), Investor Pre-filing
Notification
Letter (PNL) |
Sent
to all non-TEFRA flow-through
entities |
|
|
|
|
Letter
1845(DO), Partnership Pre-filing
Notification |
Sent
to Tax Matters Partner if
Partnership covered by TEFRA |
|
|
|
|
Letter
1976(DO), S Corporation entities |
Sent
to S Corporation TEFRA |
|
|
|
|
Shareholder Pre-filing
Notification Letter—TEFRA |
|
|
|
|
|
Letter
1977(DO), S Corporation
Pre-entities filing Notification
Letter—TEFRA |
Sent
to S Corporation TEFRA (first tier
entities only) |
Exhibit 20.1.6.8-7 (07-08-1999)
Legislative Overview
|
Reference: IRM 20.1.6.6, 20.1.6.7,
20.1.6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
IRC
Section |
Penalty Amount
Per Violation |
Effective Date |
|
|
|
|
|
6701 |
$1,000
(non-corporate)
$10,000 (corporate) |
September 4, 1982 |
|
|
|
|
|
6713 |
$ 250 |
December 31, 1989 |
|
|
|
|
|
7407 |
|
December 31, 1976 |
|
|
|
|
|
7408 |
|
September 4, 1982
For IRC section 6700 activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
7408 |
|
July
19, 1984
For IRC section 6701 activities
|
20.1.7.1
(09-30-2002)
Overview
- This
section covers the provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code (IRC) that apply
when a filer fails to meet information
return reporting requirements.
20.1.7.1.1 (09-30-2002)
General
- The
term "information return" means any
statement, form, or return as
described in Treas. Reg.
301.6721–1(g).
- The
provisions of IRC section
3406(a)(1)(B), which applies to filers
who submit Forms 1099–B, –INT, –DIV, –OID,
–PATR, R or –MISC with missing or
incorrect Taxpayer Identification
Numbers (TINs) are also included.
-
Penalty proposal notices (500 —514
Series Reference Numbers) are
generated from the information return
data that is processed to the Payer
Master File (PMF). Penalty assessments
are manually input to the Civil
Penalty Module. (MFT 13 for BMF, MFT
55 for IMF).
-
Generated penalty proposal notices may
include penalty infractions identified
for failure to timely file, failure to
file on magnetic media, and/or missing
and incorrect name/taxpayer
identification numbers (TINs).
- The
penalties for unprocessable returns
filed on either paper or magnetic
media, and the penalties for prior
year returns, are manually assessed by
the campus.
-
Compliance Functions assess
information returns penalties using
600 Series Reference Numbers.
-
Generated information return penalty
notices (500 Series Reference Numbers)
may include one, two, or any
combination of the penalties for late
filing, failure to file on magnetic
media, and/or missing and incorrect
name/taxpayer identification numbers.
-
Exhibit 20.1.7–1, 500 Series
Reference Numbers—This exhibit
shows the reference numbers
applicable to returns due after
December 31, 1989.
-
Exhibit 20.1.7–2, 600 Series
Reference Numbers—This exhibit
shows the reference numbers
applicable to information return
penalties assessed by the
Compliance functions.
Law
Enforcement Manual (LEM 20.1.7) should
be reviewed before any of the
penalties mentioned in this chapter
are considered.
20.1.7.1.2 (09-30-2002)
Form 1096 Annual Summary
- Form
1096, Annual Summary and Transmittal
of U.S. Information Returns, is used
to report the total number of paper
information returns filed for Forms
1099, 1098, 5498, and W–2G. A separate
Form 1096 must be filed with each type
of information return filed. Each Form
1096 should include:
-
The filer's name and address,
-
Filer's taxpayer identification
number (TIN),
-
Total number of information
returns filed,
-
The total federal income tax
withheld,
-
The total dollar amount reported,
and
-
The box checked which represents
the type of information return
filed, and
-
The filer's signature and the date
signed.
- Form
4804, Transmittal of Information
Returns Reported Magneticall is used
to report the above information for
returns filed on magnetic or
electronic media.
- This
information is posted to the Payer
Master File (PMF).
- Form
W-3, Transmittal of Income and Tax
Statements, is used to report Form W-2
filed with Social Security
Administration (SSA) in Wilkes-Barre,
PA.
- Form
6559, Transmitter Report and Summary
of magnetic media, is used to report
Forms W-2 filed on magnetic media with
the SSA in Baltimore, MD
- This
information is posted to the PMF if
there is a penalty issue.
20.1.7.1.3 (08-20-1998)
Forms
- The
various penalties discussed in this
chapter may apply to one or more of
the following information reporting
requirements. See Treas. Reg.
301.6721–1(g)(2).
-
Form 1098, Mortgage Interest
Statement,
-
Form 1098– E, Student Loan
Interest Statement,
-
Form 1098– T, Tuition Payments
Sttement,
-
Form 1099–A, Acquisition or
Abandonment of Secured Property,
-
Form 1099–B, Proceeds From Broker
and Barter Exchange Transactions,
-
Form 1099–C, Cancellation of Debt,
-
Form 1099–S, Proceeds From Real
Estate Transactions,
-
Form 1099–INT, Interest Income,
-
Form 1099–DIV, Dividends and
Distributions,
-
Form 1099–OID, Original Issue
Discount,
-
Form 1099–PATR, Taxable
Distributions Received From
Cooperatives,
-
Form 1099–LTC, Long-Term Care and
Accelerated Death Benefits,
-
Form 1099–MSA, Distributiobns From
an Archer MSA or Medicar + Choice
MSA,
-
Form 1099–MISC, Miscellaneous
Income,
-
Form 1099–R, Distribution From
Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or
Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs,
Insurance Contracts, etc.,
-
Form 5498, Individual Retirement
Arrangement Information,
-
Form 5498, MSA
-
Form 1042–S, Foreign Persons' U.S.
Source Income Subject to
Withholding,
-
Form 8027, Employer's Annual
Information Return of Tip Income
and Allocated Tips,
-
Form 8282, Donee Information
Return,
-
Form 8300, Report of Cash Payments
Over $10,000 Received in a Trade
or Business,
-
Form 8308, Report of a Sale or
Exchange of Certain Partnership
Interests,
-
Form 8594, Asset Acquisition
Statement,
-
W–2, Wage and Tax Statement,
-
W–2G, Certain Gambling Winnings,
-
K–1 (1065, 1120S and 1041).
20.1.7.1.4 (09-30-2002)
Common Features
- The
information contained in this section
is common to all information return
penalties discussed in this chapter,
unless otherwise indicated. Exceptions
and additional information are noted
in the discussions of the specific
penalties.
- For
IRM 20.1.7, TIN refers to either an
Employer Identification Number (EIN)
or a Social Security Number (SSN).
- IRM
20.1.7.10.1 provides procedures for
campus processing of backup
withholding notices CP2100/2100A.
Filers who file information returns
with missing, incorrect, and/or not
currently issued TINs may be liable
for a penalty under IRC section 6721.
20.1.7.1.4.1 (09-30-2002)
Payer Master File
- The
Internal Revenue Code provides civil
penalties for persons who fail to
file information returns as
required. Based on the information
return data processed to the Payer
Master File (PMF). Note: For 1991
and prior years, the penalties were
computer generated to the Civil
Penalty Module.
- See
Exhibit 20.1.7–3 for an example of a
PMF transcript.
-
Penalty proposal notices, Notice
972CG, are generated from the
PMF. Assessments which result
from the proposal are manually
input to the Civil Penalty
Module.
-
Penalties may also be proposed
as the result of an examination
of a filer's records. PMF data
may be accessed by using CC
PMFOL or PATRA as described
below. See IRM 102.8 for
information on the use of these
command codes.
- The
PMF is viewed using CC PMFOL which
allows research of:
-
The Filer
entity information,
-
Filing History—indicators
to show whether returns were
filed or a penalty was proposed
for the five most recent tax
years, and
-
A record of each
Form 1096
submitted by the filer,
including
(1) Documents—the
type and number of forms
submitted, the media used
(paper, magnetic/electronic),
whether returns were original,
amended or replacement;
(2)
payments—the total
payment for all payees for each
type of form,
(3) withholding—the
total amount withheld for all
payees,
(4) received date—for
late filed returns,
(5)
penalties—the number
of returns for which a penalty
was proposed for late filing,
magnetic media, and TINs,
-
Return due date
for each form type,
-
Extension—if
the filer received an extension
of time to file which extended
the due date of the return,
-
Waiver—if
the filer received a waiver
exempting the returns from the
requirement to be filed on
magnetic media, and
-
Totals—summary
for each form type filed,
amounts reported, and penalties
proposed.
- The
PMF maintains data for the five most
current tax years including
generated penalty assessment or
proposal amounts. However, penalty
abatements or waivers are not posted
on the PMF. This information must be
obtained from BMFOL (MFT 13) or
IMFOL (MFT 55) or by requesting the
file document. In addition, no
manual input of assessments, waivers
or abatements are shown. This
information must be obtained from
TXMOD (MFT 13/55) BMFOL, IMFOL or
MFTRA.
-
The penalty indicators show
which types of PMF generated
penalties were assessed or
proposed.
-
The penalty indicators do not
consider any manual assertions
and should be used in
conjunction with TXMOD, BMFOL,
IMFOL or MFTRA information to
determine previous compliance
history.
-
For YRS PNL a blank for a tax
year indicates that no computer
generated penalty was issued (or
proposed) for that period. For
YRS FILED a blank for a tax year
indicates that no information
returns were processed to the
PMF for that period. See (4)
above concerning manual
assessments and (6) below
concerning forms W-3/W-2.
- For
Forms W-2, currently only the
information from Forms W–3,
Transmittal of Income and Tax
Statements that were penalized or
that met penalty criteria (i.e.,
filer was granted a waiver or
extension) appear on the PMF.
Information from other Forms W–3
submitted by the filer for a
particular tax year are not posted
to the PMF. However, additional Form
W–3 and W–2 information is available
on BMFOLU (MFT 88).
- CC
PMFOL provides a summary of a
filer's submissions by return type
for the five most recent tax years
as well as a complete record of each
Form 1096 filed for all five years.
- CC
PATRA provides complete transcript
data for all five years on the PMF.
Only paper (hard copy) transcripts
are available and require three to
four weeks for delivery. See IDRS
Operations Handbook for a complete
description of all PATRA requests.
-
BMF/IMF linkage is identified by the
literal "Linked" in the entity
section of the PMF. In this
situation, the PMF and the Master
File (MF) share identical entity
information.
-
Linked PMF accounts are verified
annually and receive entity
updates from the Master File on
a weekly basis.
-
This is the only way the PMF
entity can be changed.
Individual 1096/1099 filings
will not update the PMF entity.
A different entity may be shown
on PMFOLD for individual
1096/1099 filings, however,
these will not update the PMF
entity on PMFOL or MF.
-
Approximately 95 percent of the
PMF is linked.
-
The remaining 5 percent, which
is not-linked represents new
filers or filers without BMF/IMF
filing requirements.
- The
"Transmitted" volume is the count
for the number of returns processed
which should reflect the actual
number of documents filed, minus
voided or blank forms and forms
reporting under one dollar.
-
This count will sometimes differ
from the count entered by the
filer on the Form 1096.
-
The "Subj" (Subject to Penalty)
volume further excludes returns
that are not required to be
filed by law because of the
amount being reported, e.g.,
Form 1099–INTs reporting less
than $10 dollars are
systematically dropped from the
number of returns subject to
penalty. See Exhibit 20.1.7–4.
- The
subject to Penalty ( "Subj" ) count
appears on PMFOL for each Form 1096
record and refers to the total
number of returns in a submission
that could
be penalized. No penalty is
applicable to a particular Form 1096
submission unless separate amounts
are shown in the "Late" , "MAG" or
"TIN" fields of the PMF.
- The
"Replacement" volume is for returns
that replace the original return
when a correction is submitted to
change a TIN, name, or return type.
- When
applicable, an entry for Form 8487,
Payer Master File Entity Change
Entry, will appear on the civil
penalty transcripts directly below
the document that was changed or
deleted. The affected document will
state: "NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN
REMOVED" directly above the entity
information for the affected Form
1096 record. This record will not be
considered in penalty computations.
-
Civil Penalty Summary (accruals)
provides:
-
The aggregate volume of
original, amended, and
replacement returns, by return
type, that were transmitted and
the number subject to penalty
based on all Forms 1098, 1099,
5498 and W–2G filed.
-
The gross penalty amounts
applicable to the returns that
were penalized by return type
and the type of penalty (late,
magnetic media, missing and
incorrect TINs). These figures
include all potential penalties
identified for the tax year.
-
The "Civil Penalty Proposed" is
the actual penalty amount
assessed or proposed on the
notice. This amount is limited
by the penalty maximum of
$250,000 per year and the $50
per return maximum.
-
A waiver of magnetic media
filing is indicated by a "yes"
or "no" entry. The extended due
date (if applicable) is shown by
return type. If no extension was
granted, the date shown is the
required due date for the
return. See LEM 20.1.7.1.4.5.
20.1.7.1.4.2 (09-30-2002)
Filing Requirements
- The
due dates for information returns
are listed below. When any due date
falls on a Saturday, Sunday or legal
holiday, the due date becomes the
next day which is not a Saturday,
Sunday or legal holiday (IRC section
7503). The return must be postmarked
by the stated due date.
- The
filer is required to mail a correct
statement (Forms 1099, 1098, W–2 and
W–2G) to payees no later than
January
31 of the year following the
calendar year the funds were
distributed.
- The
filer is required to file Forms
1099, 1098 and W–2G, with a Form
1096 Transmittal, with the Service
no later than February 28th (March
31st if filed electronically)
of the
year following the calendar year the
funds were distributed .
- A
filer is required to file Forms W–2,
(W–3 Transmittal of Income and Tax
Statements), with the Social
Security Administration no later
than February 28 (March 31st if
filed electronically) If the year
following the calendar year the
funds were distributed. In a leap
year the due date is February 29.
- A
filer is required to file Form 8027
with the Internal Revenue Service no
later thanthe last day of February
(March 31st if filed electronically)
of the year following the calendar
year the funds were distributed.
-
Form 5498
is
required to be filed with the
Service by
May 31 of the year following the
calendar year in which regular or
roll over contributions were made to
an Individual Retirement Account
(IRA).
-
Form 8300
.
The recipient of more than $10,000
in cash received in trade or
business is required to file Form
8300 with the Service within 15 days
after the date the cash is received.
The recipient is also required to
provide a written statement to each
person named on the form, showing
the total amount of cash received
and that the information was
provided to the Service. This
statement must be provided on or
before January 31 of the year
following the calendar year in which
the cash was received.
-
Form 8308
. A
Partnership must file a separate
Form 8308 with their Form 1065, U.S.
Partnership Return of Income, when
money or property is received by a
transferrer partner in exchange for
all or part of a partnership
interest which is attributable to
unrealized receivables or
substantially appreciated inventory
items (an IRC section 751(a)
exchange).
-
Form 8594
.
The buyer and the seller must each
report on Form 8594, The Acquisition
Statement, which must be filed with
their federal income tax return:
-
The date of sale and total sales
price (Part I);
-
Allocation of sales price among
seven asset classes and the
aggregate Fair Market Value of
each class of assests (Part II);
and
-
Supplemental information
statements to cover increases
and decreases in consideration
received by the Buyer (Part
III)..
-
This statement is filed with the
income tax return for the year
that includes the date of the
acquisition.
-
Form 8282
.
When a donee disposes of certain
charitable property within two years
of its receipt, the donee shall
provide an information return, Form
8282, to the Service on or before
the 125th day after the disposition
date of the property.
-
Form 1042–S
is required to be
filed with the Service and furnished
to the recipient by March 15th of
the year following the calendar year
the funds were distributed.
20.1.7.1.4.3 (09-30-2002)
Magnetic Media Filing Requirements
-
Information returns are filed either
on paper or via magnetic or
electronic media. Paper information
returns are filed with the campus.
Magnetic media and/or electronic
information returns are filed with
the Martinsburg Computing Center
(MCC).
- The
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1989 (OBRA '89) P.L. 101–239,
requires that uniform magnetic media
requirements apply to all
information returns filed during any
calendar year. The bill provides
that after December 31, 1989,
information returns
must
be filed either using magnetic or
electronic media when 250 or more of
the same documents are submitted.
The penalty only applies to the
returns that exceed this threshold.
For example, if 300 Forms 1099–DIV
are filed on paper, only 50 will be
subject to the penalty.
- A
filer may request a waiver from the
requirement to file on magnetic
media by filing Form 8508, Request
for Waiver From Filing Information
Returns on Magnetic Media with the
Martinsburg Computing Center.
-
The filer must show that it
would cause an undue economic
hardship if the filer were
required to file either
onmagnetic or electronic media.
-
The request must be postmarked
no later than due date of the
return.
- See
IRM 20.1.7.9.1 for an explanation of
the undue economic hardship
criteria.
20.1.7.1.4.4 (09-30-2002)
Extension of Time to File
- A
filer may request an extension of
time to file information returns.
- The
request for Forms 1099, 1098, 5498,
W–2G, 1042–S, 8027 and W–2 is made
by filing Form 8809, Request for
Extension of Time To File
Information Returns, with the
Martinsburg Computing Center. The
extension request must be postmarked
no later than the due date of the
return.
-
If the extension request is for
multiple filers, a listing
providing the TINs, names and
addresses of the filers must
also be attached.
-
Extensions are initially granted
for a maximum of 30 days.
-
A second 30 day extension may be
granted. To obtain an additional
extension the filer must file a
second Form 8809 before the
first 30 day extension expires.
-
Both the first and second
extensions must be approved by
the Service (MCC).
-
Filers may also request an extension
of time to provide the statement to
recipients (payees). The request is
made by submitting a letter to the
Service (MCC). It must be postmarked
no later than the due date of the
recipient statement.
- The
letter must contain:
-
The filer's name, TIN and
address,
-
Type(s) of information returns,
-
Reason for delay,
-
Signature of the filer or
authorized agent,
- If
approved, the extension is generally
granted for a maximum of 30 days.
- A
withholding agent may request an
extension of time to file Form 1042.
- The
request is made by submitting a
letter or Form 2758, Application for
Extension of Time To File Certain
Excise, Income, Information, and
Other Returns, to the Service.
Requests for returns that will be
filed magnetically or electronically
must be sent to MCC. If the returns
will be filed on paper, the request
must be sent to the Philadelphia
campus. The extension request must
be postmarked by the due date of the
return. If approved, the extension
is granted for 90 days.
- The
request must include:
-
Thefilers (or transmitter's)
name, address and TIN,
-
The type of return,i.e., 1042
and the tax year for which the
extension is requested,
-
If filing magnetically or
electronically the transmitter
Control Code (TCC) of the
organization or individual
requesting the extension and the
name of a contact person
familiar with the request,
-
The reason for delay and the
date the returns will be
submitted, and
-
A list providing the withholding
agents' names and TINs must be
attached, if the extension
request is for multiple filers.
20.1.7.1.4.5 (09-30-2002)
Exceptions and Special Rules
-
Inconsequential
Omission
.
The penalties discussed in this
chapter will not be assessed for any
failure to include correct
information on an information
return, tax return, or payee
statement if the failure is
considered inconsequential. An
inconsequential omission or
inaccuracy is defined as one that
does not prevent or hinder the
Service in processing the
information or putting the return to
its intended use, and does notr
hinder or prevent a payee from
timely receiving and correctly
reporting the information on its tax
return or otherwise putting the
information to its intended use.
- The
Service may administratively specify
other errors or omissions that are
never considered inconsequential.
- See
IRM 20.1.7.3.4 for additional
criteria for inconsequential errors
and omissions under IRC sections
6721, 6722 and 6723.
- See
IRM 20.1.7.9 for criteria relating
to Waivers; Definitions and Special
Rules.
20.1.7.1.5 (09-30-2002)
Penalty Assertion
- The
consolidated information return
penalties under IRC sections 6721,
6722, and 6723 apply to most of the
information reporting requirements
discussed in this chapter. The
following is a general discussion of
these IRC sections. Specific matters
are discussed later in this chapter.
- IRC
section 6721 provides for a penalty
when an information return or
statement is not correctly filed by
the due date of the return. Penalties
assessed under IRC section 6721 are
based on a time sensitive penalty
rate.
-
$15 per failure, not to exceed an
annual maximum of $75,000 for
returns filed correctly within 30
days of the due date,
-
$30 per failure, not to exceed an
annual maximum of $150,000 for
returns filed correctly after 30
days but on or before August 1, or
-
$50 per failure, not to exceed an
annual maximum of $250,000 for
returns filed after August 1,
- A
small business limitation is also a
part of revised IRC section 6721. A
complete discussion of the related
criteria is discussed in the IRM
20.1.7.4.
- IRC
section 6722 provides for a penalty of
$50 when a payee statement is not
timely and correctly furnished.
- IRC
section 6723 provides for a penalty of
$50 for a failure to comply with other
specified information reporting
requirements.
-
Waiver; Definitions and Special Rules
are addressed under IRC section 6724.
Reasonable Cause replaced due
diligence as the standard for
abatement of a penalty.
- IRC
Section 6751(b) provides that, in
general, no penalty under the code
should be assessed without prior
written managerial approval.
Exception:
Penalties calculated exclusively
through electronic means do not
require managerial approval
-
Managerial approval is not needed
when the taxpayer/payer fully
agrees to the penalty
-
Managerial approval is not needed
on penalties assessed based on no
response (i.e.: by default)
-
Managerial approval is required
whenever the taxpayer's/payer's
response disputes the penalty
AND
the tax examiner's independent
determination concludes that the
penalty cannot be completely
waived.
20.1.7.1.5.1 (09-30-2002)
Who Asserts/Assesses
- A
campus or compliance function may
determine that a penalty should be
imposed.
-
At the campus the penalty
proposal may generate
automatically based on returns
posted to the PMF, or
-
Compliance functions consider
the penalty during an
examination if it is found that
the filer failed to file, filed
late, or filed incorrectly.
-
Campuses use penalty reference codes
in the 500 series for assessing
these penalties.
-
Compliance functions use penalty
reference codes in the 600 series
for assessing these penalties.
20.1.7.1.5.2 (09-30-2002)
Computation of the Penalty
- To
compute the appropriate information
return penalty as it relates to IRC
section 6721, 6722, or 6723 multiply
the number of violations in each
penalty category by the dollar
amount associated with the
respective category:
-
Standard ($50),
-
Reduced ($15 or $30) (IRC
section 6721 only), or
-
Intentional Disregard
-
Assess only one penalty amount per
return or payee statement. This
amount will be the largest penalty
amount applicable to that return or
statement. When appropriate, use the
penalty reference number that
identifies
all violations that
apply to the return.
20.1.7.1.6 (09-30-2002)
Examination
- Secure
and make two copies of the delinquent
information returns.
-
Send the original delinquent
information returns to the
appropriate campus, the Detroit
Computer Center (DCC) or the
Social Security Administration
(SSA).
-
Place one copy in the penalty case
file.
-
Attach the other copy to Form
5346, Examination Information
Report (Form 5666, TE/GE Referral
Information Report).
-
Prepare Form 5346 (or Form 5666) for
each recipient shown on the delinquent
information returns.
-
Prepare and make a copy of:
-
Form 1096, Transmittal Document,
for information returns filed with
the campus,
-
Form W–3 for W–2s filed with the
SSA,
-
Form 4804, Transmittal of
Information Returns Reported
Magnetically for information
returns required to be filed at
MCC, or
-
Any other specific information
return not transmitted by a
transmittal document (for example
Form 8300).
- Retain
the appropriate copies in the penalty
case file.
-
Across the bottom of Form 1096, W–3 or
4804 write in red
"Delinquent Returns—Secured by
Examination (or TE/GE)—Penalty
Considered."
-
For Form(s) 1096, enter "E" (Exam)
in the first box under "Official
Use Only."
- Do
not make any markings in the top
margin of Forms 1096. This will
interfere with the processing of
these documents.
- If
there is more than one type of
information return, prepare separate
transmittals for each type of
information return.
-
Prepare Form 3198, Special Handling
Notice, and under the "Other" section
write
" Assess Civil Penalty
per Form 3645, Computation of Penalty
for Failure to File Info Returns or
Furnish Statements or Form 8278,
Computation and Assessment of
Miscellaneous
Penalties."
- Make a
copy of the face of the income tax
return for the tax year of the
delinquent information returns. Retain
the copy of the
income tax
return in the penalty case
file.
-
Prepare Form 8278, Computation and
Assessment of Miscellaneous Penalties,
for each tax year. Retain Form 8278 in
the penalty case file.
-
Prepare Form 3645, Computation of
Penalty for Failure to File
Information Returns or Furnish
Statements, for each tax year. Form
3645 should stay in the penalty case
file. Provide the following in the
explanation section:
-
The reason for the penalty.
-
Did the filer agree or disagree
with the penalty?
-
Was reasonable cause considered?
- If the
taxpayer agrees with the penalty, ask
for the payment. For payments
received, prepare Form 3244, Payment
Posting Voucher.
- Do not
secure an agreement on Form 4549,
Examination Income Tax Changes Report.
The information return penalty case
file is separate from an income tax,
employment tax or other case file.
- When
asserting the penalty and the waiver
provisions were considered, the
following items must be noted on the
Form 8278.
- When a
waiver is denied:
-
Assert the penalty;
-
Give the filer written appeal
rights,
-
Note on Form 8278 that the waiver
provisions were considered,
-
Identify the waiver requested
using the penalty reason codes in
Exhibit 20.1.1–3.
- When a
waiver is granted:
-
The penalty should not be
assessed,
- A
notation made on Form 8278 that
the waiver provision was granted,
- After
determining whether to grant or deny
the waiver provision claimed, identify
the waiver request using the penalty
reason codes in Exhibit 20.1.1–3.
20.1.7.1.6.1 (09-30-2002)
Collection Compliance Procedures
-
Assessments
-
Generally information return
penalties are not asserted by
collection actions, however
collection personnel are not
prohibited from making these
types of assessments. During the
course of an investigation or
other contact with taxpayers it
may be determined that required
information returns have not
been filed. The information
returns should be secured from
the taxpayer, and if
appropriate, the applicable
penalty recommended for
assessment.
-
Across the bottom of Form 1096,
W–3 or 4804 write in red
"Delinquent Returns—Secured by
Collection—Penalty Considered."
For Form(s) 1096,
enter "C" (Collection) in the
first box under "Official Use
Only."
Caution:
Do
not make any markings in the
top margin of Forms 1096. This
will interfere with the
processing of these documents.
-
A Civil Penalties Master file
has been developed to
accommodate most penalties using
MFT 55 (for IMF) and MFT 13
(BMF). Form 8278 (Computation
and Assessment of Miscellaneous
Penalties) is used to forward
the assessment/abatement action
for input.
-
For penalties being recommended
under IRC section 6721, 6722 or
6723, Form 3645 (Computation of
Penalty for Failure to File
Information Returns or Furnish
Statements) should be prepared.
(1) A determination as to
reasonable cause should be
entered under the caption
"Recommendation of Examining
Officer." (2) If
reasonable cause does not exist,
the penalty should be collected.
The Form 3645 and information
documents, should be attached to
Form 8278 and submitted with the
daily report for assessment.
-
Abatements/Non-assessment
-
Reference IRM 20.1.7.9 for
waiver provisions due to
reasonable cause for penalties
under IRC section 6721, 6722 and
6723.
-
Penalties asserted by
Examination will be identified
by TC 240 with 600 series
reference number. Prior to
abating these penalties,
collection employees will obtain
the examination assessment file
for any information previously
presented by the taxpayer. This
information should be reviewed
and taken into consideration in
making a reasonable cause
determination.
-
When taxpayers request
non-assertion or abatement of
penalties due to reasonable
cause, the taxpayer must submit
a signed statement explaining
the basis for
non-assertion/abatement or sign
Form 3870 (Request for
Adjustment). (1) The signature
must be executed under the
penalty of perjury. This
requires insertion of
"under
penalty of perjury the above
information is true, correct and
complete," on Form
3870 prior to obtaining the
taxpayer's signature. (2) The
penalty reason code (see exhibit
20.1.1–3) for abating the
penalty will be clearly
annotated in red on the face of
the Form 3870
" RC–" (fill in
number corresponding to
applicable reason code).
-
Requests for
non-assertion/abatement of
penalties for reasonable cause
will be approved by the
requesting employee's manager.
Approval will be denoted by the
employees manager's signature
next to the work approved on the
form requesting
non-assertion/abatement.
-
Unassessed
Liabilities
: If after
discussion of the causes for the
failure, the employee determines
that a taxpayer's failure was not
due to reasonable cause, the
employee will inform the taxpayer
that the penalty will be asserted.
-
If the taxpayer disagrees with
the employees determination and
maintains that the penalty
should not be asserted, the
employee should provide written
notification of the denial to
the taxpayer.
-
Pattern Letter 2414(P) will be
sent to the taxpayer advising
them of their pre-assessment
appeal rights, and claim
procedures and post assessment
appeal procedures.
-
When a collection employee
decides to deny reasonable cause
and proceeds with assertion of
the penalty, it is imperative
that the decision be recorded in
such a manner that other Service
employees will be aware that
reasonable cause has already
been addressed.
-
For that reason, when reasonable
cause is denied at the time the
information return penalty is
recommended for assessment, the
reason code (See exhibit
20.1.1–3) will be annotated on
Form 8278 in column (e) opposite
the penalty amount assessed. The
penalty reason code (PRC) shall
be entered in red in the
following format "PRC– " (fill
in number corresponding to
applicable reason code).
-
Assessed Liabilities
: When the collection
employee makes a determination not
to abate a penalty for reasonable
cause, the taxpayer will be informed
of that decision.
-
If the taxpayer disagrees with
the employee's determination and
maintains that the penalty
should abated, written
notification should be provided
to the taxpayer using Pattern
Letter 2413(P).
-
An appropriate input document
will be used to request input of
TC 290, Reason Code 92, blocking
series 98. This is necessary to
insure that, if subsequent
claims of reasonable cause are
received, the employee will be
able to determine that the issue
has been addressed before.
-
If the taxpayer submits a
written appeal, the collection
employee who rejected the
abatement request will examine
the appeal for additional
information which may change the
original determination not to
abate the penalty.
-
Normally collection action will
be suspended on the penalty
portion of the assessment during
the 15 day period granted to the
taxpayer to file an appeal, or
during the period the case is
under consideration by Appeals.
However, action need not be
suspended if circumstances
meriting continuation of
collection action exist. The
Collection Compliance function
employee must obtain managerial
approval not to suspend
collection of the penalty
portion of the assessment.
20.1.7.1.6.2 (09-30-2002)
Campus Procedures
- The
penalties will be assessed on a
Civil Penalty Module:
-
MFT 13 (Business Master File),
or
-
MFT 55 (Individual Master File).
- The
penalty will be
assessed/waived/abated/sustained
using command code ADJ54. Input:
-
A TC 290,
-
The appropriate reference number
(see Exhibit 20.1.7–1),
-
The dollar amount of the
penalty: (1) as a positive
amount to assess, (2) as a
negative amount to abate, or (3)
as a zero amount to sustain (if
no change), and
-
Blocking series: (1) 52X for the
first assessment (full or
partial change) on the module,
(2) 53X for any subsequent
adjustments on a module with a
previous black 52 , (3) 98X for
any full or partial
disallowance, or (4) 15X for
full waivers on BMF accounts or
to file attachments,
correspondence, etc., (5) 05 for
full waivers on IMF accounts, or
to file attachments,
correspondence, etc.
-
Use Hold Codes, Priority Codes,
Posting Delay Codes, and Penalty
Reason Codes as applicable. See
Exhibit 20.1.1–3, and Document
6209 for additional information
regarding these codes and
indicators.
- Use
Letter 1948C to answer questions
from the filer, to request
additional information, or to notify
the filer that the explanation
submitted establishes reasonable
cause and the penalty will not be
charged or will be removed.
-
Letter 854(c) is sent to the filer
when a penalty waiver or abatement
request is fully or partially
denied. This letter provides appeal
rights and the procedures filers
must follow if they wish to appeal
the Service's decision.
-
Only
use Letter
854C when the filer has
submitted an explanation which
can be fully evaluated to
determine that the filer does
not have reasonable cause to
have the penalty abated or
waived. Letter 854C should not
be used to close a case which
requires additional information
to determine whether reasonable
cause exists or for " no reply"
cases.
-
Letter 854C should list the
reason(s) the abatement request
is being denied.
-
Replies to Letter 854C should be
evaluated to determine if the
information provided will allow
the penalty unit to abate the
penalty. If not, route the reply
to Letter 854C to the Campus
Penalty Appeals Coordinator.
- When
considering the assessment, or
abatement of a penalty or a waiver
request, the following information
must be input to the appropriate
Civil Penalty Module:
-
If reasonable cause was
considered and was either
established or denied, enter RC
62 in the first reason code
position, and
-
When waiving/abating a penalty
due to reasonable cause, use the
appropriate Penalty Reason Code
(PRC) (as shown in Exhibit
20.1.1–3) in the fourth reason
code position.
Note:
Do
not use Reason Code 62 if the
penalty is waived/abated for
other than reasonable cause,
e.g., processing errors. In
this case use only the
appropriate fourth position
reason code.
- If a
credit balance remains on the
account after an abatement
due to a
credit offset from another module
research to see if the offset module
is still on the account. If present,
reverse the credit back to that
account.
- When
making an adjustment on a civil
penalty module, the TC 290 acts as a
carrier transaction. The TC 290 and
the reference number will post to
the civil penalty module as a TC
240/241 with the reference number
used in the adjustment transaction.
- See
IRM 3.15.60, General DP Adjustments,
for complete campus processing
instructions.
-
Before making any assessment, you
must use the research Command Codes
BMFOL, IMFOL, INOLE, EINAD, or SSNAD
to make sure that the penalty is
being assessed on the correct
filer's account. To avoid unpostable
conditions, the following factors
must be considered prior to making
the manual assessment.
-
It may be necessary to establish
the filer's entity on the Master
File if it has not been
established.
-
The Entity Control Unit must
establish BMF entities.
-
The penalty unit will establish
entities and create Civil
Penalty Name Lines for IMF
accounts as required.
-
See IRM 20.1.7.1.9 for these
procedures.
-
DO NOT
manually assess information return
penalties against any Federal
agency.
-
Forward a copy of the Form 1096,
Form 4804 or Form W–3 to the
Headquarters Office,
S:C:CP:RE:P. If unprocessable
returns are involved, also
forward Letter 1865C and a
sample of the returns (3–5) with
the unprocessable document.
-
For magnetic media returns,
forward the 4804 and any other
documentation provided by MCC.
-
Mark the Form
1096, 4804, or W–3
"Penalty Not
Assessed."
- All
computer generated penalty proposal
notices for Federal agencies are
suppressed by the Payer Master File
if the employment code "F"
designation is present on the Master
File. In addition, any IRP civil
penalty assessed (in error) against
Federal agencies will automatically
unpost if the Employment Code "F"
designation is on the Master File.
These unpostables will be sent to
the IRP Civil Penalty Unit on a
Nullified Distribution List. Verify
that the entity is a Federal agency
and forward the list to the
Headquarters Office, S:C:CP:RE:P.
- If
the Employment Code "F" designation
is not present on the Master File,
the penalty proposal notice or
penalty assessment will generate.
Campuses should pull these notices
during notice review per the
instructions in IRM 20.1.7.1.6.2.
20.1.7.1.6.3 (09-30-2002)
Processing Notice 972CG
-
Notice 972CG, Notice of Proposed
Civil Penalty, will generate from
the Payer Master File for filers who
fail to comply with the information
reporting requirements. See IRM LEM
20.1.6.3.4 for additional
information on Notice 972CG.
-
Campuses will receive separate tape
files for:
-
Notices 972CG (IMF) that require
special handling,
-
Notices 972CG with TIN listings,
-
Notices 972CG without TIN
listings containing up to 15
pages,
-
Notices 972CG without TIN
listings containing over 15
pages,
-
PMF transcripts provided for
each penalty case,
-
TIN listings containing up to
250 payee records
-
Suspense copies of all notices,
including those mailed by MCC
(see (4) below), and
-
CP 215A/15A, "Summary of
Proposed Penalty" —to be mailed
with Notices CP 215/15. See (16)
below.
- Each
file will be sorted in TIN order.
- For
notices that include a proposed
penalty for missing and/or incorrect
TINs for 250 or less payee records,
a paper listing of the payee records
with missing, incorrect or not
currently issued TINs will be
provided for mail out with Notice
972CG.
- MCC
will mail Notice 972CG and a tape
listing for filers with 251 or more
payee records with missing or
incorrect TINs.
-
Notices which include a penalty for
TINs (penalty Reference Numbers 502,
505, 507, 510) must be associated
with TIN listings and Publication
1586.
These notices must be prepared
manually for mail out.
-
Notices without TIN listings
containing over 15 pages must also
be folded and mailed manually.
- IMF
notices that require special
handling must be reviewed to
separate notices that can be mailed
from those that may require a change
in the name on the notice before
mailing. See IRM 20.1.7.1.6.
- The
Notices referenced in (2)(c) above
may be mailed by Machine Services
after they are reviewed for garbled
data and printing problems.
-
Campuses must produce two copies of
the TIN listings and retain the
second copy for association with the
suspense file. See IRM 20.1.7.1.6
.3.4 regarding recreate requests.
- The
PMF transcript received for each
notice should be retained with the
suspense copy of the notice.
-
Campuses must print and maintain the
suspense copies of all notices.
-
Tape reels
for Notice 972CG and TIN listings
must also be retained for 180 days.
- A
control listing for Notices 972CG
will be generated for each campus.
Note:
This listing generates as the
first item in the file which
contains the PMF transcripts.
- In
addition, a separate control listing
will be generated for filers who
receive TIN listings (paper and
tape). This listing will include the
filer's TIN (EIN or SSN), name,
address, account access key number,
tape (MCC) or paper (SC) sequential
number, transmittal number, and the
total volume of missing, incorrect,
and/or not currently issued TINs.
- Mail
labels (filer name and address) will
be generated for each Notice 972CG
that will be mailed with a TIN
listing.
-
Campuses should produce one copy of
the file containing CP 215A/15A,
Summary of Proposed Penalty.
This item
is not to be mailed with Notice
972CG. It should be set aside for
later use with notices CP 215/15.
See IRM 20.1.7.1.6.
- The
Headquarters Office will notify the
campus and MCC of the actual dates
that the tape files will arrive and
the file number of each tape.
20.1.7.1.6.3.1 (09-30-2002)
Mailing Notice 972CG
-
For notices with TIN listings a
complete package from the campus
should contain:
-
The Notice 972CG
-
Listing of missing, incorrect,
and/or not currently issued
TINs,
-
Publication 1586, and
-
A
bar-coded return envelope
(E–73).
- A
complete package from MCC should
contain:
-
Notice 972CG,
-
Magnetic tape listing of
missing, incorrect, and/or not
currently issued TINs,
-
Publication 1586, and
-
A
bar-coded return envelope
(E–73).
-
The campus should mail the notice
and listing(s) in the E–44A
envelope, using the mail label
(filer name and address) provided.
MCC will use the appropriate
magnetic tape coverage.
-
Annually, each campus must supply
MCC with an adequate number of
bar-coded return envelopes to mail
with the notices generated for
their campus.
-
For notices without TIN listings a
complete package will include:
-
Notice 972CG, and
-
A
bar-coded return envelope
(E–73).
-
Mailer envelope E–199 will be
used to mail the notices.
-
Review notices and TIN listings
for garbled information.
- Do
not mail to Federal agencies. Send
any notices of this nature to the
Headquarters Office, S:C:CP:RE:P,
for disposition.
-
The campuses (and MCC) should
contact the Headquarters Office
for assistance if a TIN listing is
received without a Notice 972CG.
-
Any notice with Resolution Trust
Corporation (RTC) or Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC) in the entity should not be
mailed. Refer the notice to the
Examination Classification
Specialist
- If
a filer contacts the campus
indicating that they have
erroneously received a Notice
972CG and/or TIN listing for
another filer, apologize and
advise them to immediately return
it to a designated contact person.
Note:
Campuses should establish a
designated contact person to
expedite the return of misrouted
mail.
-
Research to attempt to find
the correct mailing address.
If found, mail the notice to
the correct filer and complete
the required disclosure
procedures,
-
Stamp the current date on the
notice prior to mailing.
-
See IRM 20.1.7.1.7.2 for
undeliverable mail procedures.
20.1.7.1.6.3.2 (09-30-2002)
Special Notice Review Procedures
for Notices 972CG
-
These procedures are necessary to
address a problem that occurs with
IMF notices due to a condition
which prevents the assessment of
penalties on joint accounts (MFT
55). See IRM 20.1.7.1.9.2. Other
conditions exist (primarily with
non-linked accounts) that requires
the manual review of the entity to
ensure that the name on the notice
is acceptable.
-
IMF notices with joint names and
other conditions will be sorted
separately (except for those which
already have a Civil Penalty Name
line on the Master File) to
identify the responsible spouse.
-
Campuses must review the entities
on these notices prior to mail
out.
-
The name on Notice 972CG will be
changed so that it agrees with the
name of the responsible spouse who
will be assessed the penalty if
the Notice 972CG is not resolved.
Pull notices if any of the
following conditions is present:
-
A
joint name line is present,
-
The only name is a business
name, or
-
Garbled information.
Note:
Any notices in this selection
which have an individual name or
a business name in addition to
an individual name may be mailed
without change.
-
For joint name lines, research to
verify to which spouse the SSN
belongs. Prepare a new mail label
including the name of the spouse
associated with the SSN. Cover the
old name and address with the
label and mail the notice.
- If
a business name is the only name
present, research for the name of
an individual associated with that
SSN. If found, prepare a mail
label with the individual name.
Include the business name on the
second name line. Cover the old
name and address with the label
and mail the notice.
-
For business names, also consider
the possibility that the TIN shown
is an EIN instead of SSN (the TIN
will appear in SSN format).
Research to determine whether the
name/TIN is a valid BMF entity. If
so, mail the notice.
-
For garbled information, research
to find or verify the correct
individual name associated with
the SSN.
-
For (6), (7) and (8), if unable to
find a valid name associated with
the TIN, do not mail the notice.
- If
an address change is identified
during research, verify the name
and correct the address.
- If
the notice is mailed later than
the date on the notice, stamp the
current date on the notice. Also
stamp the new date on the file
copy.
- If
a penalty must be assessed on
these accounts, it will be
necessary to establish the account
or to create a Civil Penalty Name
line following the procedures in
IRM 20.1.7.1.9.2.
20.1.7.1.6.3.3 (09-30-2002)
Special Notice Review CP 215/15
-
These procedures must be followed
for all IRP Civil Penalty notices,
CP15/215 with reference numbers
5XX (excluding reference number
549 and 550).
-
The following notices must be
reviewed prior to mailing:
-
All notices
assessing penalties of
$100,000 or more.
The amount may be lowered at
the discretion of the campus
or area. Notices should be
reviewed for accuracy and
coordinated with any reviews
conducted by the ARDI
(Accounts Receivable Dollar
Inventory) function.
-
All notices
assessing penalties against
state or local agencies,
charitable organizations,
Large Complex Corporations and
others determined to be
sensitive
by the campus and/or areas.
These notices will be reviewed
to give the campus Director
the opportunity to alert the
appropriate Area Director or
Taxpayer Advocate, if desired.
-
For Large
Complex Corporation
cases, coordinate with the
Technical Unit (or other
designated function). Clearly
notate the file as a Large
Complex Corporation so that
replies to correspondence
received by the penalty unit
can be coordinated with the
Technical Unit.
-
Any notices assessing penalties
against Federal agencies must not
be mailed. Abate these penalties,
notate " Penalty Abated" and
forward to Headquarters Office,
S:C:CP:RE:P.
-
Penalties may be assessed against
state or local governments.
-
Any notice with Resolution Trust
Corporation (RTC) or Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC) in the entity should not be
mailed. Refer the notice to the
Examination Classification
Specialist.
-
Review notices for garbled
information.
-
Each notice mailed must include
Notice 925, Penalty Code
Explanations.
-
Also, if notice 972CG was mailed
prior to the CP 215/15, a penalty
summary sheet, "Summary of
Proposed Penalty " (CP215A/15A)
will be provided for mailing with
the CP notice.
-
All CP 215A/15A will be
generated at the same time as
Notice 972CG (see IRM
20.1.7.1.5).
-
The CP 215A/15A should only be
mailed if the penalty amount
on the CP notice is the same
as on Notice 972CG. If the
amount on the CP notice is
different, do not include the
summary sheet.
-
Date stamp the summary sheet
with the same date as the CP
notice.
-
See IRM 20.1.7.1.7.2 for
undeliverable mail procedures.
20.1.7.1.6.3.4 (09-30-2002)
Recreating Notice 972CG
-
Filers may contact either the
campus or the MCC IRP Customer
Service Siteto request recreates
(copies) of Notice 972CG and/or
TIN listings. These requests may
be received at any time after the
initial mailing of the notices.
- If
a recreate request is received
before the expiration of the 45
day response date for the Notice
972CG (see 20.1.7.3.4.8 of LEM
XX–700), the campus should change
the date on the notice to allow
the filer 45 days to respond. MCC
will also contact the campus to
change the notice date when they
do a recreate for a tape listing.
However, the notice date should
not be changed again if a second
or subsequent recreate request is
received from the same payer.
-
The procedure for filling the
requests will differ for paper and
tape and is based on when the
request is received.
-
For Notices 972CG mailed alone or
with a paper listing of missing
and incorrect TINs:
-
Campuses are required to
retain a second printed "file"
copy of the Notice 972CG
(indefinitely) and the file
copy of the TIN listings for
at least 180 days.
-
Campuses will fill requests
received within the 180 day
period by photocopying the
"file" copy of the notice and
TIN listing and mailing it to
the payer. These requests may
be received directly at the
campus or may be forwarded to
the campus, through the
Management Analyst, from the
MCC IRP customer service site.
-
The Headquarters Office,
Management Information
Technology (MIT) function will
fill requests for copies of
TIN listings received after
the 180 day period. MIT will
retain this data for four
years. Requests received by
campus must be routed through
the IRP Centralized Customer
Service Siteto the
Headquarters Office MIT
function. A contact sheet will
be provided for this purpose.
-
When MIT has filled the
request, they will coordinate
the mailing to the campus for
association with Notice 972CG
(if necessary) or will mail
the listing directly to the
filer.
NOTE-Headquarter Operations do
not retain copies of 972CGs or
TIN Listings.:
Note:
Filers who did not respond to
Notice 972CG will generally have
received the penalty notice at
this point.
-
For tape notices:
-
The MCC IRP Centralized
Customer Service Sitewill fill
all requests received for tape
listings of missing and
incorrect TINs within the four
year retention period, (i.e.,
four years from the date of
Notice 972CG).
-
MCC will also retain hard
copies of the original Notice
972CG.
-
Requests for recreates of tape
listings of missing and/or
incorrect TINs received by the
campuses must be routed
through the Management Support
Branch Analyst to the IRP
Centralized customer service
site.
20.1.7.1.6.3.5 (09-30-2002)
Correcting Erroneous Entity
Information
-
This procedure is used to delete
and/or move a Form 1096 which has
posted to the wrong filer's
account, TIN or tax year on the
PMF. Form 8487, Entity Change
Entry, is used to make this
correction.
-
The unpostables area occasionally
researches entity information on a
PMF unpostable (for Form 1096) and
find both a valid IMF and BMF
entity.
-
Unpostable staff have been
instructed to post the PMF
source document using the BMF
entity information when both
are equally correct.
-
The filer is informed of the
action the Service has taken
to post the Form 1096 source
document.
-
In
the event the filer disagrees
with this action, they will
correspond to the unit
responsible for working the
IRP penalties. The penalty
unit should request a PMF
transcript to determine which
transaction needs to be
changed or deleted, then use
Form 8487 to make the
correction. In addition, Forms
1096 may post to the wrong
filer's account when there was
an unsuccessful attempt to
merge two accounts on the BMF
or IMF resulting in a
"no-merge" condition. A
successful merger which was
done in error may also result
in Forms 1096 posting to the
wrong filers account. If
either situation is identified
based on correspondence
received from the filer,
campus should contact the
Headquarter's Office for
assistance before preparing
Forms 8487.
-
Route completed Forms 8487 to
Numbering and Batching.
20.1.7.1.6.3.6 (09-30-2002)
PMF Uncorrectable Unpostables
-
PMF transactions (Forms 1096) that
fail to post are sent to the
unpostable area for resolution. If
the unpostable area is not able to
resolve the condition, they return
the transaction to the PMF as
uncorrectable. The uncorrectable
transactions are then screened for
potential penalty situations.
-
Late filed submission, See LEM
20.7.1.6.3.6
-
Submissions which met the
magnetic media filing
requirements will be
regenerated to the campus's
IRP Civil Penalty Unit.
-
The IRP Civil Penalty Unit
will make a final attempt at
resolving the unpostable
condition.
-
The campuses will receive the
listing (P/R/F/102–95–11) of
potential penalty cases titled
"PMF Uncorrectable Unpostables
Meeting Penalty Criteria." This
listing will be generated annually
and will contain the information
necessary to research the Master
File for a valid entity. Use the
following instructions to resolve
the potential penalty case:
-
Obtain a microfilm copy of the
Form 1096 source document to
assist in researching for a
valid entity on the Master
File. See the instructions for
microfilm research in IRM
20.1.7.1.8. Also, contact MCC
to request copies of Forms
4804 for magnetic media filed
returns.
-
Research the TIN and name
control using, PMFOL, IMFOL,
BMFOL, EINAD, SSNAD, or ENMOD.
See IRM 20.1.7.1.9 for
specific instructions on
creating entities.
- If
a valid entity is found, check the
TIN against the listings of
extensions and waivers for the tax
year in question.
-
If
the TIN is on the extension
listing, DO NOT assess the
late filing penalty
unless the received
date is later than the
extended due date. See LEM
20.7.1.6(3)(a).
-
If
the TIN is on the waiver
listing DO NOT assess the
penalty for failure to file on
magnetic media. See LEM
20.1.7.1.6(3)(d).
Caution:
If a TIN is changed as a
result of the research,
check both the old and the
new TIN against the
extension and waiver
listings.
-
If
the TIN is not on the
extension or waiver listing,
assess the penalty manually
following the procedures in
IRM 20.1.7.1.6.2.
- If
a valid entity is found, also
forward a copy of the Form 1096 to
Receipt and Control for processing
through DIS and posting to the PMF
(whether or not a penalty is
assessed).
-
First correct the name or TIN
on the Form 1096 as
appropriate.
-
Also annotate "Correction to
PMF Unpostable Penalty
Considered" on the 1096 and
forward the copy to Receipt
and Control.
-
On
the routing slip notate
"Process as original" to alert
Receipt and Control that they
should process the copy as an
original document.
-
Keep a copy of the corrected
Form 1096 in the case file.
-
DO NOT
forward a copy
of Forms 4804 to Receipt and
Control. Keep these documents
in the case file.
-
Monitor the assessment action to
ensure the penalty posts to the
taxpayer's account.
-
Upon completion of this work, send
a report to the campus penalty
analyst showing counts for paper
and mag/electronic records
separately:
-
Total number of cases
received,
-
Number of resolved cases
(valid entity found, etc),
-
Number of penalties assessed,
-
Forms 1096 processed through
DIS (applies to paper only),
and
-
Number of unresolved cases (no
valid entity found or other
reason).
20.1.7.1.6.3.7 (09-30-2002)
Form 3491—
Consumer Cooperative
-
Filers are entitled to an
exemption from filing Forms 1096
and 1099–PATR under Treas. Regs.
1.6044–4(a)(2) if they can
establish that they meet the 85
percent rule as explained on page
2 of Form 3491, Consumer
Cooperative Exemption Application
(for Exemption from Filing Forms
1096 and 1099 PATR). The
cooperative must be primarily
engaged in selling retail goods or
services of a type which are
generally for personal, living, or
family use.
-
Stamp or obtain the Area
Director's signature of approval
and mail the original Form 3491 to
the filer. File a photocopy of the
document using CC ADJ54, TC
290.00, reference number 600, and
"exemption from filing Form 1096"
in the remarks area.
20.1.7.1.7 (09-30-2002)
Undeliverable Mail
-
Process undeliverable notices within
48 hours of receipt.
-
Research for a better address using CC
INOLE, ENMOD or IRPTR.
-
INOLE will provide the most
current posted entity information
on the NAP.
-
ENMOD may reflect a recently input
address change that has not posted
to INOLE.
-
IRPTR will provide a current
address for the filer from an
information return filed for the
most recent processing year.
-
Telephone directories may be used as a
secondary source if IDRS research does
not provide a better address.
NOTE
New address information
obtained from these sources may not be
used to update the taxpayer's address
on the Master File.
20.1.7.1.7.1 (09-30-2002)
Undeliverable Notices 972CG
- If
Notice 972CG is undeliverable,
research for a different address.
-
If one is found, stamp the
current date on the notice and
re-mail (include the original
envelope),
-
Also stamp the new date on the
file copy of the notice.
Note:
It
is important to stamp a new
date on the file copy to
ensure that the filer is
allowed 45 days to respond
before the assessment of the
penalty.
- If
no other address is found for
notices mailed by the campuses, file
the undeliverable notice, (including
TIN listing and Pub. 1586, if
applicable), and the original
envelope with the file copy of
Notice 972CG.
- MCC
will search for a better address for
undeliverable notices mailed by MCC.
If found, MCC will stamp the new
date on the notice and re-mail. MCC
will also notify the campus to stamp
a new date on the file copy.
- MCC
may also send a listing to the
appropriate campus for any notices
where MCC is unable to find a better
address. The campus will do
additional research to attempt to
find a new address to allow MCC to
mail the notice and tape.
-
Campuses will return the listing
to MCC indicating new addresses,
-
MCC will stamp a new date on the
notice and notify the campus of
the new notice date,
-
If campuses are unable to find a
new address for notices mailed
by MCC, they should annotate the
case history to show that the
notice was undeliverable.
-
Campuses should also attempt to
maintain an accurate count of
undeliverable notices mailed by
MCC for reporting purposes (see
IRM 20.1.7.3.6.)
-
Research again for a new address
when these notices are purged for
assessment of the penalty.
-
If a new address is found, stamp
a new date on Notice 972CG and
re-mail (include the original
envelope),
-
If no new address is found,
assess the penalty.
-
Follow the procedures in IRM
20.1.7.1.7.2 if the CP 215/15 is
returned as undeliverable.
20.1.7.1.7.2 (09-30-2002)
Undeliverable Notices CP 215/15
- If
Notice CP 215/CP15 is undeliverable,
research letters with operational
errors, incomplete or incorrect
names, or erroneous or extraneous
data. Correct the error and mail the
letter or notice.
-
Place a label with the correct
address over the incorrect address
if the notice contains:
-
A balance due and the date of
the notice is no more than seven
days prior to the current date
(also
see (3) below) ,
-
An even balance notice,
regardless of the date,
-
A taxpayer inquiry, regardless
of the date, or
-
An overpayment notice.
- If
the notice is a balance due notice
and is dated more than seven days
prior to the current date, recompute
interest on reassessed penalties,
correct the notice on IDRS, and
retype the notice following
procedures in IRM 21.4 and IRM 21.5.
See IRM 20.2.1 when recomputing
interest.
- If
no better address is found, route
the undeliverable letter or notice
to the Files Unit for
association/attachment to the
assessment document under the
Controlling DLN.
20.1.7.1.8 (09-30-2002)
Requesting Microfilm Source
Documents
- These
procedures may be used to request
copies of Forms 1096 or W–2/W–3 for
returns filed on
paper
only. The PMF shows whether returns
were filed on paper or
magnetic/electronic media.
- To
request Forms 4804 for Forms 1099
filed on magnetic media/electronic
media, see IRM 20.1.7.3.4.3.).
-
DO NOT
request Form 6559, Transmitter
Report and Summary of Magnetic
Media, and Form 6559–A,
Continuation Sheet for Form 6559,
Transmitter Report and Summary of
Magnetic Media, for Forms W–2
filed on magnetic media. See LEM
20.1.7.3.4.2
- You
may request copies of Forms 1096 (not
1099s) and W–2/W–3. Generally,
campuses should not request Forms W–3.
However, if Forms W–2 are needed to
resolve a penalty case, request both
Form W–3 and W–2s. See LEM
20.1.7.3.4.3
-
Forms 1096
:
When it is necessary to obtain a
SCRIPS image or a microfilm print of
the Form 1096, request it using the
procedures in the IDRS Handbook. The
DLN of the 1096 is required to request
the documents.
-
The 14 digit DLN consists of:
-
Check the PMF transcript to
determine where the returns were
processed. The first two digits of
the DLN identify where and how the
Form 1096 was processed. See
Exhibit 20.1.7–6.
-
SCRIPS Documents: Use CC ESTAB
with the definer "S" to request
the image. See IRM 3.13.5.7, IDRS
Handbook. The entire DLN is
required when requesting a SCRIPS
document. In some cases a
Universal Access Routing (UAR)
Code, must be entered as the last
line of the data. This code
includes the following: @, SC, EC
(at, code of the campus that
processed the SCRIPS documents,
and the operator's entry code).
Enter data with no spaces.
-
Non-SCRIPS campuses must use the
UAR code in addition to the input
currently requested in IRM
3.13.5.7, IDRS Handbook.
-
SCRIPS campuses should only use
the UAR code when they are
requesting documents from another
SCRIPS campus.
-
During the transition to SCRIPS,
some documents may be microfilmed
on the old system. If a SCRIPS
image is not received after
requesting through ESTAB "S" , use
ESTAB " M" . See the procedures
for OCR and DIS documents.
|
DIGITS |
DEFINITION |
|
1,
2 |
campus or Area
Office code |
|
3 |
Tax Class (5) |
|
4,
5 |
Document Code (69)
|
|
6,
7, 8 |
Julian Date |
|
9,
10, 11 |
Block Number |
|
12, 13 |
Sequence Number |
|
14 |
List year |
- OCR
and DIS Documents:
-
Input requests using ESTAB with
both definers "S" and "M" . During
the conversion to SCRIPS, OCR and
DIS documents may have been either
imaged or microfilmed.
-
Only ten digits of the DLN are
required when requesting
microfilmed documents (the DLN
minus digits 3, 4, 5, and 14).
-
The procedures for ESTAB "M" are
contained in IRM 2.3.1, IDRS
Handbook. The following exceptions
apply for input of Form 1096
requests: (a) Use Micro Request CD
"4" ; (b) MFT 01 (BMF) or MFT 30
(IMF); (c) Enter the modified DLN
as the Micro Request number; (d)
Enter Micro Code "R" after the
tenth digit of the DLN.
- In
the remarks section, enter "1096
Request" and the list year of the
DLN (digit 14).
-
Form 3774, Request for Research,
may be used as an alternate method
for requesting copies of Form
1096. (1) Complete all applicable
sections of Form 3774. The DLN of
the Form 1096 must be entered in
the remarks area followed by "1096
Request." (2) If the Form 1096 was
processed in another campus,
complete Form 3774 and route it to
the appropriate campus.
-
Forms W–2/W–3:Use
Form 3774 to request microfilm copies
of Forms W–2/W–3. Complete all
applicable sections of Form 3774 to
ensure the complete request will be
returned to the requester.
-
Enter "W–2 Penalty" in the
category section (Box 2) on Form
3774.
-
Enter the Microfilm Sequence
Number (MSN) of the Form W–3 in
the remarks. To convert the MSN
back to the 11 digit number
assigned by SSA, drop the first
two digits (SC code) and the
fourteenth digit (list year).
These digits were added to allow
the service to process the
information.
-
Also, enter "W–3 and all W–2s " in
the remarks for W–2/W–3 requests.
Note:
The MSN(s) must be highlighted
to ensure proper handling.
-
Forward the request to the
following address to obtain a
print of the document. Allow 4
weeks for receipt of the requested
microfilm.
Internal Revenue Service
Latham Circle Mall, Suite 200
800 New Loudon Road
Latham, NY 12110
20.1.7.1.9 (09-30-2002)
Creating Entities or Namelines for
Non-Return Civil Penalty Cases
- These
procedures are required to establish
entities if there is no entity on the
BMF or IMF or where a civil penalty
name line (CVPN) must be established
(the CVPN applies to IMF accounts
only) to assess the penalty.
- An
account will be created on the master
file to manually assess the penalty on
IDRS. See the separate procedures that
apply to BMF (IRM 20.1.7.1.9.1) and
IMF (IRM 20.1.7.1.9.2) accounts.
-
Campuses will manually assess all IRP
penalties on IDRS. Research must be
completed prior to making the
assessment to ensure that the penalty
is being assessed to the correct
filer's account (see IRM
20.1.7.1.6.3.5). However, in the event
one of these assessments goes
unpostable, the case may be referred
to the penalty unit to correct the
entity problem.
- These
procedures will also be used when
no-merge transcripts are generated for
penalties assessed to the wrong SSN.
20.1.7.1.9.1 (09-30-2002)
BMF Entities
- The
Entity function is the only area
authorized to establish BMF
accounts. Hand carry or use Form
3210, Document Transmittal, to route
all cases which require that an
account be established on the BMF to
the Entity Control Unit. Maintain
controls for all cases routed to
Entity and ensure that they are
returned for penalty assertion.
-
Assess the appropriate penalty on
IDRS following the instructions in
this IRM. Verify that the penalty
was not previously assessed on the
Civil Penalty Module (CPM).
20.1.7.1.9.2 (09-30-2002)
IMF Entities
- All
IMF penalties must be assessed
against the responsible individual.
Assessments against joint accounts
will not post to the Civil Penalty
Module (CPM).
-
After entity is established on
the CPM or the civil penalty
name line (CVPN) is created, the
penalty should be manually
assessed following the
appropriate instructions in this
IRM.
-
In addition, correspondence
should only be sent to the
responsible individual, ensure
that the spouse's name is
removed before sending out a
notice.
- An
unpostable condition will occur when
the taxpayer does not have an
account on the IMF under his or her
own SSN. Using the valid individual
SSN, establish the account using
Command Code ENREQ with TC 000.
- If
the penalty is to be assessed
against a spouse filing as the
secondary
taxpayer on a joint individual tax
return and that spouse has no
account on the IMF, establish an
account using CC ENREQ with TC 000.
-
Assess the
appropriate penalty following
the instructions in this IRM.
Verify that this
is not a duplicate assessment.
-
Once an account is established,
Master File processing will
establish a Civil Penalty Name
Line (CVPN) on MFT 55 when the
civil penalty assessment is
input. Once created, the CVPN
remains on the account and
applies to all civil penalty
periods.
-
Special action to establish a CVPN
for assessing civil penalties is
required if
all of the following
conditions are met:
-
The current account is, or has
ever been joint,
-
The assessment will be against
the
primary taxpayer
whose
SSN controls the
account, and
-
The account does not already
have a CVPN.
Note:
If
a CVPN already exists, MFTRA
transcripts and CC INOLE or ENMOD
will display it after the current
name and address data.
- To
establish a separate CVPN, use an
IMF entity change (CC ENREQ to
generate a TC 013) with the special
CVPN procedures described in the
IDRS Handbook. When using this
special procedure, only the CVPN
change may be input. No other entity
change information is permitted.
Information to otherwise update the
entity, such as an address change,
should be input
before
establishing the CVPN. When using
this procedure, both first and last
names must match the Master File
name. If the name does not show on
IDRS, check MFTRA or INOLE.
- If
the correct account is on the Master
File and has a CVPN, the name line
may be updated (e.g., taxpayer's
current account name is Mary Jones
and the CVPN is Mary Smith) by input
of CC ENREQ with the special
procedures described above.)
-
EXAMPLE 1:
A joint account is on Master
File for John and Mary Doe
(John's is the controlling SSN).
A penalty is to be assessed
against John. The account has no
existing CVPN.
Action :
Input a CVPN for " John Doe"
using the special procedures for
establishing a CVPN shown in the
IDRS Handbook. The penalty may
be assessed immediately.
-
EXAMPLE 2:
On the same joint account as
above, the penalty is to be
assessed against Mary Doe. Mary
has an account on Master File
under her own SSN with the name
line of Mary Jones because she
filed individually before filing
jointly with John Doe. There is
no CVPN on her account because
she is the secondary taxpayer.
Action :
Input a name change (and address
change, if appropriate) to her
existing Master File account,
then assess the penalty. No CVPN
needs to be input because she is
the secondary taxpayer.
-
EXAMPLE 3:
On a Joint account for John and
Mary Doe, the penalty is to be
assessed against Mary. However,
Mary has no account under her
SSN on the Master File.
Action :
Establish an account for her on
the Master File using her SSN
with TC 000, as described in the
IDRS Handbook, then assess the
penalty. No CVPN needs to be
input.
-
EXAMPLE 4:
John Doe has a separate account
without a CVPN on Master File
and a penalty is to be assessed.
No special name line action is
required, the penalty may be
assessed and a CVPN will be
generated by Master File.
-
EXAMPLE 5:
John and Mary Doe do not have an
account on the Master File since
they are non-filers. A penalty
is to be assessed against John.
If a joint return is to be
processed as a delinquent or
substitute, a joint name line
should be established before
establishing a CVPN. Once the
joint entity is established,
follow the special CVPN name
line procedures to establish
CVPN for John.
20.1.7.2
(09-30-2002)
Powers of Attorney for Civil Penalties
-
Accountants, attorneys, enrolled agents
or other representatives from whom a
taxpayer has requested assistance on tax
issues submit inquiries to the Service.
The third party representative expects a
reply to the inquiry so that the issue
can be explained to the taxpayer.
- To
authorize the third party reply, the
representative may submit a Form
2848, Power of Attorney and
Declaration of Representative, or
- Form
8821, Tax Information Authorization.
We refer to the power of attorney
requests as "POAs" and the tax
information authorization requests
as "TIAs" .
- POA
documentation may be received with a
response to a civil penalty notice. The
POAs or TIAs cannot be entered on the
Centralized Authorization File (CAF)
because civil penalties are asserted
against non-return information
documents. To ensure valid POA's/TIA's
are recognized:
- The
POA/TIA should be kept with the
penalty case file and used for all
subsequent correspondence.
- When
the penalty case and the POA/TIA are
not kept together, local procedures
must be established to maintain a
civil penalty data base or listing.
-
Information supplied in correspondence
received from a third party may be used
per the instructions in LEM 20.1.7.9.1.
20.1.7.2.1 (09-30-2002)
Authorized Third Party
- If a
valid POA or TIA is received, copies
of correspondence pertaining to the
taxpayer should be sent to the
authorized representative.
Note:
Refunds are not allowed to be sent
to appointees named on Form 8821.
- A
reply from a valid POA should be
handled in the same manner as if the
taxpayers themselves were responding.
-
Original documents, photocopies or
documents submitted by FAX
transmission are acceptable for
processing.
- If the
POA or TIA is received with the
response to the CP15/215, review them
for the following information:
-
The name and mailing address of
the taxpayer;
-
Identification number of the
taxpayer (e.g., social security
number, ITIN, employer
identification number;
-
Employee plan number (if
applicable);
-
Name and mailing address of the
representative(s)/apointees;
-
The type of tax involved, the
Federal tax form number, the
specific year(s)/period(s)
involved (in estate maaters the
decedent's date of death), and
specific tax matter or actions to
be performed;
-
the taxpaeyer(s)' signature(s);
- In
the case of a Form 2848, a
completed Declaration of
Representative(Part II).
- If the
POA is granted to an attorney, CPA,
enrolled agent or actuary, a
declaration of good standing before
the Service must be signed by the
designated representative (Part II of
Form 2848).
- If any
of the items listed above are missing,
reject the request as invalid and
return it to the taxpayer using Letter
861C/SC.
- If the
POA/TIA is valid and it specifies that
it is for the CP15/215 only, file it
in the penalty case file.
Note:
The
form may also specify the Forms 1099
(series), Form 1096 or Civil
Penalty, etc.
- If
the POA/TIA does not specify
CP15/215 only but does include
authorization for tax returns,
make a copy of the document for
the penalty case file to be used
with any subsequent
correspondence, and,
-
Route the original POA/TIA to the
CAF unit in the Taxpayer Relations
Branch.
20.1.7.2.2 (09-30-2002)
Unauthorized Third Party
- No tax
information can be sent to or
discussed with an unauthorized third
party.
- If
the unauthorized third party is
requesting authorization to act on
behalf of the taxpayer or is
requesting information concerning
the penalty assessment, send
Letter 135C to the third party.
-
Any further correspondence
required should be sent directly
to the taxpayer. Include a
paragraph in the taxpayer's letter
requesting that the taxpayer
notify the third party of our
direct reply to the taxpayer.
20.1.7.3
(09-30-2002)
Failure to File Correct Information
Returns IRC section 6721
- For
information returns or statements, a
penalty may be imposed for filing
returns:
-
After the due date, (See LEM
20.1.7.1.6.3),
-
Without all required or correct
information, (including missing,
incorrect and/or not currently
issued TINs),
- On
paper when required to be filed on
magnetic media, or
- When
filed on magnetic media, in a manner
which does not allow them to be
processed or be read by machine (not
processable).
- The
penalty for information returns is $50
per return with a maximum of $250,000
per calendar year. This amount is
subject to the reductions and
limitations discussed in IRM 20.1.7.3.1
and 20.1.7.3.2.
20.1.7.3.1 (09-30-2002)
Reduction of the Penalty
- If a
failure is corrected
within 30
days after the due date of
the information return, the penalty
will be decreased to $15 per failure.
The maximum annual penalty per filer
shall not exceed $75,000.
- If the
failure is corrected
more than
30 days after the due date of the
return, but on or before August 1 of
the filing year, the
penalty will be decreased to $30 per
failure. The maximum annual penalty
per filer shall not exceed $150,000.
- See
IRM 20.1.7.3.3 for an explanation of
the de minimis exception. This
exception applies only to a limited
number of corrected returns filed by
August 1 of the filing year.
-
Form 8300.
If a failure to file correct
information returns
Form 8300
is
corrected within 30 days of
the due date of the return, the
penalty is decreased to $15. If the
failure is
corrected after the 30 days,
the penalty is $50 per failure. The
reduction applicable to the time frame
of "after
30 days and on or before August 1st"
is not applicable because the Form
8300 does not have a fixed due date.
-
Small Business
Limitation.
If the filer's average annual gross
receipts for the three most recent
taxable years do not exceed
$5,000,000, the maximum penalty in
each of the three penalty categories
will be reduced. See IRC section 448C
(2) and (3) when computing the average
gross receipts test.
- If
the filer's average annual gross
receipts for the most recent
taxable years ending before the
calendar year in which the return
was required to be filed
-
(or if shorter, the period the
business has been in existence) do
not exceed $10,000,000, the
maximum penalty in each of the
three penalty categories will be
reduced.
-
For example, if the filer uses a
calendar year for tax purposes,
and the calendar year the return
is required to be filed is 2000,
then, the most recent three
taxable years would be 1999, 1998,
and 1997.
-
The total maximum information
return penalty assessed against
one filer, at $50 per failure may
not exceed $100,000 for all
failures during any calendar year.
-
The total maximum, for information
return penalties, that can be
assessed against one filer, for
all failures corrected
within
30 days of the due date
of the information return ($15 per
failure), shall not exceed
$25,000, during any calendar year.
-
The total maximum, for information
return penalties, assessed against
one filer, for all failures
corrected
more than 30 days after the due
date of the return, but on or
before August 1, of the
year the return was required to be
filed, ($30 per failure) shall not
exceed $50,000.
20.1.7.3.2 (09-30-2002)
Intentional Disregard of Rules and
Regulations
- The
Intentional Disregard of the Rules and
Regulations Penalty applies when the
facts and
circumstances show that the
filer
knowingly or willfully
failed to comply with the requirements
of IRC sections 6721.
-
Intentional disregard occurs when a
filer who knows, or should know of a
rule or regulation, chooses to ignore
its requirements. The facts should
show the filer:
-
Was required to file,
-
Knew or should have known of the
requirement to file, and
-
Consciously chose not to file or
recklessly disregarded (i.e.,
ignored) the duty to file the
information return.
- Treas.
Reg 301.6721–1(f)(3)(I) provides that
a pattern of failures indicates
intentional disregard. The greater the
number of failures, the greater the
likelihood some of those failures
could be due to intentional disregard.
-
Additional indications of the
existence of intentional disregard
are:
-
Did the filer correct the failure
promptly after the discovery of
the failure;
-
Did the filer correct the failure
within thirty days after
notification of the failure by the
Service; and
-
Did the filer avoid an
administrative inconvenience or
was the cost of compliance greater
than an IRC section 6721 penalty.
- For
instance, intentional disregard may
exist when it would be less expensive
for the filer to pay the penalties
under IRC section 6721(a) rather than
to comply with the filing requirement.
Treas. Reg. 301.6721–1(f)(3)(iv). See
LEM 20.1.7.9.1.
- The
Intentional Disregard of the Rules and
Regulations Penalty amounts to:
-
$100 for each information return
required to be correctly filed, or
if greater:
- 10
percent of the total amount
required to be reported on the
information returns for dividends,
patronage dividends, interest,
fishing boat operators, royalties,
and wage and tax statement, or
- 5
percent of the total amount
required to be reported on the
information returns for brokers,
exchange of partnership interest,
or disposition of donated property
payments.
-
Form 8300 Penalty.
The Intentional Disregard penalty for
failing to file a correct Form 8300
under IRC section 6050(I)(a) is the
greater of:
-
$25,000, or
-
The amount of cash required to be
reported in the transaction up to
$100,000.
-
The penalty applies to cash
amounts exceeding $10,000 received
by a trade or business (as defined
by IRC section 162).
-
The information required to be
provided by the recipient of the
cash includes: (1) the name,
address, and TIN of the person
providing the cash, (2) the amount
of cash received, and (3) the date
and nature of the transaction.
-
The Form 8300 is required to be
filed within 15 days of the
receipt of the reportable amount.
- There
is no maximum dollar limitation for
the Intentional Disregard of the Rules
and Regulations Penalty.
- No
more than one penalty per return can
be imposed even if there is more than
one failure on the same information
return. However, where a return is
filed with multiple failures and the
penalty amounts differ, the higher
penalty should be imposed.
-
For example, only one penalty may
be imposed on a return which is
filed both late and incomplete.
- If
the failure to provide the
information is due to intentional
disregard, but the late filing is
not, the intentional disregard
penalty should be imposed.
-
The intentional disregard penalty
on Form 8300 should only be
determined by field Examination
offices. Taxpayers assessed this
penalty may be offered a
preassessment administrative
appeal.
20.1.7.3.3 (09-30-2002)
Exceptions and Special Rules
- The "de
minimis" exception may
apply to the number of incorrect
information returns remaining after
the reasonable cause waiver has been
allowed (see LEM 20.1.7.3.4). The de
minimis exception may apply if the
return:
-
Was filed, and
-
Had missing or incomplete
information, and
-
The filer supplied the missing or
incomplete information on or
before August 1st of the filing
year, and
-
The maximum number of corrected
information returns to which this
exception applies cannot exceed
the greater of: (1) 10, or (2)
one-half of one percent of the
total number of returns required
to be filed during that calendar
year.
-
This exception only applies to
returns that were due on either
the last day of February or March
15th.
- The
penalty shall not be assessed for
errors or omissions that are
considered inconsequential.
- The
term "inconsequential" means any
failure that does not make it
difficult for, or prevent the Service
from:
-
Processing the return,
-
Matching the information return
shown with the payee's tax return,
or
-
Otherwise putting the information
return to its intended use.
- Errors
or omissions are never considered
inconsequential if they relate to:
- A
taxpayer identification number,
- A
surname of a payee, and/or
-
Any monetary amount.
- If a
return has more than one error or
omission and the penalty amount for
those failures differs, the penalty
will be imposed at the higher amount.
20.1.7.3.4 (09-30-2002)
Failure to Timely File Information
Returns
- These
procedures are used to identify late
filed paper
returns received by the campus during
the current processing year:
-
The delinquent Form 1096 is date
stamped by Receipt and Control. A
delinquent indicator "X" , will be
marked in the first box under the
title "For Official Use Only."
-
Tartan operators will key in the
received date from the date stamp
whenever the "X" is present and
the information returns will be
processed to the PMF.
-
When processing is complete for
the year, a penalty proposal
Notice 972CG will be generated by
the PMF unless the filer was
granted an extension of time to
file. The penalty is applicable if
the returns were filed after the
extended due date.
- If
the filer files current year
information returns late with an
explanation, Receipt and Control
will request a tax examiner to
review the explanation to
determine if a penalty should be
charged.
- If the
submission is all original or mixed
original and corrected returns, follow
the procedures below as appropriate.
See LEM 20.1.7.3.4.
- If the
filer's explanation meets reasonable
cause and no penalty will be assessed,
with managerial approval take the
following actions:
-
Circle out or line through the
date stamp,
-
Ensure that the first box on the
Form 1096 under the title "For
Official Use Only" is not marked
with an "X" ,
-
Annotate on the Form 1096
"Reasonable cause established"
(see "d" below) in an area that is
not scanned,
-
NOTE:Beginning
with processing year 1995, no
markings of any kind may be
entered in the top margin of Form
1096. Markings in this area would
interfere with processing these
documents under the SCRIPS
processing system.
-
Therefore, use care when circling
out date stamps to avoid marking
the top margin,
-
"Reasonable cause established"
must be written in either the
bottom margin of Form 1096 or in
the white space between the two
columns of instructions at the
bottom of the form.
-
Using CC REQ54, file the
correspondence and a copy of the
1096 as source documents (see IRM
20.1.7.1.6.2),
-
Send the filer Letter 1948C
explaining our determination, and
-
Forward the Form 1096 and
associated returns for normal
processing.
- If the
filer's explanation
does not
meet reasonable cause and the
determination is to allow the PMF to
generate a penalty proposal for late
filing, follow the instructions below:
-
Place delinquent indicator
"X"
in the first box on the
Form 1096 under the title "For
Official Use Only,"
-
Create a case file containing a
copy of the transmittal,
postmarked material (if
available), and the taxpayer's
correspondence,
-
Send the filer Letter 53C
explaining our determination, and
-
Forward the Form 1096 and
associated returns for normal
processing.
- Do
not identify returns filed by
Federal agencies for the penalty.
-
Also do not allow the penalty to
be assessed if it can be
determined that Forms 1099 DIV
reported liquidation distributions
or were distributed under IRC
section 404(k) for an employee
stock ownership plan (ESOP).
- MCC
will enter the received date and
provide postmarked material for late
filed returns filed on magnetic or
electronic media to allow the PMF to
automatically generate the penalty
proposal for late filing. The notice
will generate unless the filer was
granted an extension of time to file.
-
The magnetic media transmittal
Forms 4804 are date stamped by MCC
for late filed returns.
-
When a filer requests an
explanation of the penalty
assessment or disputes the
penalty, the transmittal documents
must be requested from MCC so that
a copy can be sent to the filer.
See IRM 20.1.7 for requesting
these forms.
- If
the payer uses the postal service
to ship the data to MCC, the
postmark is retained and sent to
the campus to validate a received
date.
20.1.7.3.4.1 (09-30-2002)
Late Filing Penalty (Prior Year
Returns)
-
These instructions apply to late
filed information returns received
by the campus with a due date prior
to the current processing year. For
processing year 2000, this would
apply to returns filed for tax years
1998 and prior. See LEM
20.1.7.3.4.1.
-
Penalties for all prior year returns
will continue to be assessed
manually through IDRS to generate
notice CP 215/CP 15 from the Civil
Penalty Module (MFT 13/55). These
notices will not be preceded by
Notice 972CG.
-
Receipt and Control will forward
these returns to the area
responsible for assessing the IRP
penalties. MCC will also forward
Form 4804 for assessment of the late
filing penalty for returns filed
either magnetically or provide the
received date.
- Do
not assess any penalties on Forms
1096 if the following conditions are
present:
-
Delinquent returns secured by
Examination or Collection—with
"penalty considered" coded on
the form (see IRM 20.1.7.6.1 and
20.1.7.6.2). Examination or
Collection Compliance previously
considered penalties on these
returns. If not present, code an
"E" in the first box under
"Official Use Only" on Forms
1096 secured by Examination and
a "C" in this box for forms
secured by Collection.
-
A Form 1096 "N" coded on the top
campus of the form indicates
that penalties were considered
by Receipt and Control.
-
If any of these conditions
exist, notate " Penalty
Considered" (if not present) and
forward the Forms 1096 and
associated returns to the IRP
unit in Receipt and Control for
processing. See LEM
20.1.7.3.5.2.
- If
the returns were submitted without
an explanation, see LEM
20.1.7.3.4.1.
- If
the returns were submitted with an
explanation for the late filing,
consider reasonable cause as
appropriate. See IRM 20.1.7.9.1 for
definitions of reasonable cause.
Also see LEM 20.1.7.9.1.
- If
the filer's explanation establishes
reasonable cause and the penalty
will not be assessed, with
managerial approval, take the
following actions:
-
Using CC REQ54, file the
correspondence and a copy of the
Form 1096 as source documents.
See IRM 20.1.7.1.6.2.
-
Send the filer Letter 1948C
explaining our determinations,
-
Circle out or line through the
date stamp and the delinquent
return indicator ( "X" in first
box under "Official Use Only" ).
See IRM 20.1.7.3.4(d) prior to
making any markings on Form
1096.
-
Annotate the 1096 "Reasonable
Cause Established" and forward
to the IRP unit in Receipt and
Control for processing.
-
( Note:
only the 3 most recent prior
years can be processed through
DIS.) Dispose of older prior
years.
- If
the filer's explanation does not
establish reasonable cause and the
penalty will be assessed, take the
following actions:
-
Research using MFTRA transcript
or IDRS to ensure that the
maximum has not been reached
before assessing any further
penalties.
-
Use reference number 500 to make
assessments for late filed
information returns.
-
Create a case file containing a
copy of the Form 1096/1099 or
Form 4804 transmittal document
and any postmarked material (if
sent from MCC).
-
Enter delinquent indicator "P"
in the first box under "Official
Use Only" on Form 1096 followed
by the received date in MMDDYY
order. Forward the original Form
1096 and associated returns to
the IRP unit in Receipt and
Control for processing.
-
Forward the case file to Files
for association with the
adjustment document.
- Do
not assess penalties against any
Federal agency.
20.1.7.3.4.2 (09-30-2002)
Late Filing Penalty (Forms W–2)
- Late
filed Forms W–2 are identified by
the Social Security Administration
(SSA). This information is posted to
the Payer Master File (PMF) for the
penalty program (see LEM
20.1.7.3.4.2).
-
Only Forms W–2/W–3 that are
included in Notice 972CG (i.e.,
waiver or extension granted)
will appear on the PMF. Other
Forms W–2/W–3 submitted by
employers are currently not
posted to the PMF. These may be
researched using CC BMFOLU, if
necessary.
-
Extensions and waivers for Forms
W–2 that have been approved and
meet penalty criteria will post
to PMF, even if the forms are
not subject to a penalty.
- The
PMF records for late filed Forms
W–2/W–3 will not include a received
date but should include the entry "
Late SSA" and penalty indicators 1,
2, or 3 to show whether the $15,
$30, or $50 (respectively) penalty
applies. This indicator does not
appear on PMFOLD.
- SSA
will date stamp Forms W–3
transmittals for delinquent Forms
W–2 filed on paper and Forms
6559/6559–A for delinquent Forms W–2
filed on magnetic media.
-
Microfilm copies of Forms W–3 will
be forwarded to the campus from WIRS
(Albany Area Office). Forms
6559/6559–A from SSA will be sorted
by a designated campus and the
appropriate forms routed to the
other campus.
-
Explanation of Forms 6559/6559–A:
-
Form 6559 contains information
about the transmitter of the
magnetic media file and lists
summary W–2 data for the
individual employers whose data
was reported on the magnetic
media file. Either a date stamp
or late filed label will be
affixed to Form 6559. If the
label is present, it will
contain the transmitter's name,
EIN, address and the received
date. The date may be shown in
Julian date or calendar date
format.
-
Form 6559–A is a continuation
form for listing the individual
employer data reported on the
magnetic media file and summary
information from the Forms W–2
transmitted.
-
Penalties may be assessed for
some or all of the employer EINs
shown on Forms 6559/6559–A.
Note:
Some filers listed may have
received an extension of time to
file.
-
Form 6559/6559–A may include
multiple entries for the same
employer EIN. All entries shown
for that EIN should be taken
into account for the penalty.
- See
IRM 20.1.7.1.8 if it is necessary to
request microfilm prints of Forms
W–2/W–3 from WIRS.
20.1.7.3.4.3 (09-30-2002)
Receiving Responses (Failure to
Timely File)
-
Generally, filers must establish
reasonable cause for the penalty to
be abated. See IRM 20.1.7.2.9 for
definitions of reasonable cause and
IRM 20.1.7.9.2.9 for the special
abatement conditions.
- If
the filer requests a copy of the
Form 1096 which resulted in the
penalty, request a microfilm print
of the Form 1096 and send it to the
filer. The DLN of the Form 1096 that
resulted in the penalty can be found
on the PMF transcript. Follow the
instructions in IRM 20.1.7.1.8 to
request microfilm prints of Form
1096.
- If
the SCRIPTS copy of the Form 1096 is
not available after repeated
attempts see LEM 20.1.7.3.4.3.
-
Filers may request copies of
transmittal Forms 4804 submitted
with Forms 1099 etc. filed on
magnetic media or provide received
dates for electronic media or the
documents may be required to answer
the filer's question about the
penalty assessment. These procedures
will apply to responses to Notice
972CG and replies to any subsequent
balance due notices.
-
The campus must contact MCC to
request date stamped copies of
these forms for late filed
magnetic media returns.
Note:
MCC will continue to provide
Forms 4804 in advance for the
campus to make certain manual
assessments.
-
MCC needs the filer's name, TIN,
and the transmitter's control
code (TCC) (available on the PMF
transcript). Also provide the
return type, number of returns,
the received date and the DLN of
the submission.
-
MCC will furnish the forms
within two weeks.
-
Written requests should be
submitted to MCC using Form
3210. MCC will also accept
requests by FAX.
-
Campuses should batch their
requests and submit them to MCC
no more than once a week except
in extreme cases.
-
Campuses should use their
established MCC contact points
to coordinate requests by mail
or FAX.
-
If necessary, contact the
Headquarters Office for
assistance.
-
To prevent unauthorized
disclosures, sanitize Forms 4804
to exclude all other filers'
data before being mailed to the
filer. This does not apply to
the "transmitter" information on
Form 4804.
-
If MCC is not able to provide
copies of Forms 4804 in disputed
cases, see LEM 20.1.7.3.4.3.
-
Transmittal Forms W–3 (paper) and
6559/6559–A (magnetic media) are
shipped to the Penalty Unit in
advance for the penalty program.
- If
the filer requests a copy of Form
W–3, send a photocopy to the filer.
If the Form W–3 is not available,
see LEM 20.1.7.3.4.3.
- If
the filer requests a copy of Form(s)
W–2 filed
on paper or if copies of
Form(s) W–2 would help to resolve a
case, they may be requested from
WIRS (see IRM 20,1.7.1 Inform the
filer that it will take 6 weeks to
receive copies of the documents. DO
NOT submit a request to WIRS for
Forms W–2
filed on magnetic media.
- If
the filer requests a copy of Forms
6559/6559A, send a photocopy to the
filer. If the form is not available,
see LEM 20.1.7.3.4.3.
- When
Forms 6559/6559–A are sent to the
filer, they must be sanitized to
exclude all other employers' data on
the form to prevent unauthorized
disclosure. This does not apply to
the transmitter information.
- If
the label on Form 6559 has a Julian
date, convert it to the calendar
date and send a quick note to the
filer explaining that the date on
the label is a Julian date. If no
date is shown on the label, see LEM
20.1.7.3.4.3.
-
Additional paperwork generated by
SSA in their processing of Form W–2
data may be received with Forms
6559/6559–A.
-
campuses may use discretion to
determine when sending a copy of
the paperwork in addition to or
in lieu of the Form 6559/6559–A
may be helpful, e.g., the
paperwork shows the actual
number of documents processed by
SSA which equals the number of
documents penalized and the Form
6559/6559–A shows a different
count.
-
Do not send the paperwork if it
only duplicates the employer
information on Form 6559/6559–A.
Campuses must ensure that the
information on the paperwork
applies only to the employer in
question to prevent an
unauthorized disclosure.
- If
the filer's response indicates that
the Form W–2 data was submitted
timely to MCC in error and returned
to the filer or transmitter by MCC,
see LEM 7.3.4.3.
-
Paperwork received from SSA may
include the control sheet, SELECT
SUBMITTER CONTACT FUNCTION sheet
from SSA's control system for
magnetic media filers or other
documents created by SSA. This
information may be helpful in
analyzing cases where a penalty was
assessed for a late resubmission
(original documents returned to the
filer to correct unprocessable
conditions).
-
The documents contain the
initial receipt date of a file,
(Send DTE or Return Date)—all
dates when SSA returned a file
due to unprocessable conditions,
and Due Date—or date by which
the file must be resubmitted to
avoid a late penalty, (see LEM
20.1.7.3.4.3) and Received Date
or Resubmission Date or dates a
file previously returned to the
filer to correct unprocessable
conditions was received for the
second or subsequent time, and
the number of phone calls (when
applicable) SSA made to the
filer concerning a problem file.
-
Dates may be in Julian format.
-
Returns (Forms 1099 and W-2) filed
on magnetic media with unprocessable
conditions are returned to the filer
by MCC and SSA for corrections. See
LEM 20.1.7.3.4.3.
- When
a correction is required to change
the return type, e.g. a return
originally filed as INT income was
actually DIV income, the filer must
file two returns to make the
correction.
-
A corrected INT return is filed
(with zero money amounts) to
zero out the original INT
return, and
-
A replacement DIV return is
filed as an original return.
- All
current year late filing penalty
cases are compared to the extensions
of time to file that post to the PMF
prior to the generation of penalty
notices.
-
However, if a filer responds
with an approval letter from MCC
granting an extension, check to
see if the filer's TIN appears
on the extension listing
provided by MCC.
-
If present, the penalty should
be abated.
-
If the TIN is not on the
extension listing, see LEM
20.1.7.3.4.3.
20.1.7.3.4.4 (08-20-1998)
Responses to Combined Annual Wage
Reporting (CAWR)
- The
Service assesses penalties for cases
referred by the Social Security
Administration (SSA) when there is a
discrepancy between wages reported
on Forms W-2 and what is reported to
the Service on Forms 941. SSA will
make two attempts to contact the
employer to resolve the discrepancy.
-
If SSA is unable to resolve the
discrepancy, the cases are sent
to the Service. A SSA
discrepancy is identified when
the employer reports more Social
Security Wages to the Service
than to SSA. A SSA discrepancy
is resolved when the employer
provides missing Forms W-2,
amends their Form 94X or submits
other information to resolve the
discrepancy.
-
An agreement between the Service
and SSA requires the Service to
correspond with the employer in
an effort to secure missing
Forms W-2 from the employer. SSA
does not have the authority to
assess penalties or enforce
collection of the Forms W-2. SSA
refers these cases to the
Service in a tape format that is
compared to the Business Master
File (BMF). If a match is made,
a CP253 notice is issued to the
employer requesting the
information necessary to resolve
the discrepancy.
-
Penalty Assessment:
If the discrepancy is
not resolved
by either the filing of the missing
Forms W-2, an amended Form 94X, or
by providing an explanation of the
discrepancy, the Service is directed
to assess a penalty.
- The
Late Filing
penalty will be assessed
for Forms W-2 secured by CAWR. If
Forms W-2 are
submitted in response to
the initial CAWR correspondence
(CP253):
-
The employer will be assessed
the late filing penalty ($50 per
form) applicable under IRC
section 6721(a),
-
The penalty is assessed using
Reference Number 550 and the
assessment notice CP 215 is sent
to the employer.
- The
Failure to
File penalty is assessed
if Forms W-2
are not submitted or
discrepancies
are not resolved in
response to the initial CAWR
correspondence. If Forms W-2
are not
submitted in response to the initial
CAWR correspondence (CP 253), the
employer will be assessed a Failure
to File penalty (the greater of $100
per missing return or 10 percent of
the total wages that were required
to be reported). See IRC section
6721(e).
-
Intentional
Disregard:
The penalty is assessed using
Reference Number 549. If Forms W-2
are secured after the Service
assesses the intentional disregard
penalty, see LEM 20.1.7.3.4.4.
- The
CAWR Unit will work these cases to
resolve discrepancies, collection of
Forms W-2 (including shipments to
SSA) and assessment of penalties.
CAWR will handle all responses to
the CP 253 and CP 215 (Reference
Number 549 and Reference Number 550)
penalty notices.
-
Penalty Relief:
The general penalty relief criteria
is discussed in IRM 20.1.1.3.
Special abatement conditions as
discussed in IRM 20.1.7.9.2.9 must
also be considered. Additional
administrative abatement criteria
may develop while working these
cases.
-
Generally, we would expect these
criteria to form unique
conditions\issues in the CAWR
program. When unique conditions
are identified, they should be
brought to the attention of the
Headquarters CAWR Analyst.
-
Prior to abating a CAWR penalty,
be aware of the numerous
attempts made by both the
Service and SSA to solicit the
correct information from the
employer. If a payor claims the
forms were filed, contact the
local SSA office to verify that
they have received the missing
Forms W-2. Failure to secure and
properly credit the missing
Forms W-2 will impact an
individual's SSA earnings record
and ultimately that individual's
retirement benefits.
-
Given the history of correspondence
sent to the taxpayer by SSA and CAWR
unit, caution should be used in
abating the penalty. Careful
consideration should be given to all
filers claiming that they filed the
required Forms W-2 timely.
-
A copy of a Form W-3 with a
timely signature date should not
be accepted alone as evidence
because a fictitious document
can be easily prepared. However,
if a taxpayer provides a copy of
the Form W-3 and copies of Forms
W-2 other than copy A along with
a timely dated return receipt ,
all penalties should be abated.
-
The employer may have submitted
returns timely that were
returned by SSA for an
unprocessed condition, then
never resubmitted by the
employer. The penalty would be
applicable in this situation.
-
Proof of submission can be made
by contacting SSA as outlined in
accordance with CAWR guidelines.
- If
the employers response indicates
that they did not understand why the
penalty was assessed, send Letter
1948C using the open paragraph with
the following:
-
You were assessed a late filing
penalty of [$] for the tax year
[20xx ] Forms W-2 that you
recently submitted to the
Service. This penalty was
assessed because you did not
file the Forms W-2 by the due
date.
-
The law requires you to file
Forms W-2 with the Social
Security Administration by the
last day of February of the year
following the year the wages
were earned.
-
If the forms are not filed by
the due date, a penalty of $15,
$30, or $50 per return up to
$250,000 per year may be
assessed. The amount of the
penalty is determined by the
date we receive the forms.
-
Forms W-3 involved in CAWR penalty
assessments will not appear on PMFOL
or the PMF transcript.
20.1.7.3
Failure to File Correct
Information Returns IRC section
6721
20.1.7.3.4
Failure to Timely File
Information Returns
20.1.7.3.4.5 (08-20-1998)
Penalty for Failure to File
on Magnetic Media
-
The Payer Master File (PMF)
generates a penalty proposal
notice when a filer fails to
comply with the magnetic media
filing requirements for
information returns. Failure
to file in the required
manner, i.e., on magnetic
media or in other
machine-readable form as
provided under IRC Section
6011(e) and the regulations
thereunder will result in a
penalty.
-
A
penalty of $50 per return is
proposed for each return filed
on paper in excess of the
magnetic media threshold. This
criterion applies separately
to each document type and
separately for amended
returns. The penalty should
not be assessed if an undue
hardship waiver was granted by
MCC and posted to the PMF. See
LEM 20.1.7.3.4.5.
20.1.7.3.4.6 (08-20-1998)
Receiving Responses
-
Filers may avoid a penalty by
establishing reasonable cause
for the failure. See IRM
20.1.7.9 for definitions of
reasonable cause and IRM
20.1.7.9.2.9 for the special
abatement conditions.
-
See LEM 20.1.7.3.4.6.
-
All current year magnetic
media penalty cases are
compared to the waivers of the
magnetic media filing
requirement that post to the
PMF prior to the generation of
penalty notices.
-
However, if a filer
responds with an
approval letter
from MCC granting a waiver
of the magnetic media
filing requirement, check
to see if the filer's TIN
appears on the waiver
listing provided by MCC.
If present, the penalty
should be abated using the
correct Penalty Reason
Code (PRC).
-
If the TIN is not on the
waiver listing, see LEM
20.1.7.3.4.6.
-
If
the taxpayer's response
indicates that duplicate data
was provided on paper and
magnetic media:
-
First attempt to verify
using the PMF transcript
or PMFOL and any
supporting documentation
sent by the filer.
-
If no supporting
documentation is found on
the PMF transcript or
PMFOL, contact MCC and
provide the filer's name,
TIN, EIN, Transmitter
Control Code (TCC) if
available, tax year, type
of return and the number
of returns filed. See LEM
20.1.7.3.4.6.
-
If
the filer requests a copy of
the Form(s) 1096 which
resulted in the assessment on
paper Forms 1098/1099, request
a SCRIPS print (see IRM
20.1.7.1.8) of the Form(s)
1096 and send it to the filer.
The DLN of the Form 1096 can
be found on the PMF transcript
and on PMFOLD.
-
If
the SCRIPS print of Form 1096
is not available after
research, sanitize the page(s)
of the PMF transcript
containing the 1096 record(s)
relevant to the penalty and
send the filer a copy with an
explanation.
-
If
the filer requests a copy of
the Form(s) W-3 which resulted
in the assessment on paper
Forms W-2 send a photocopy to
the filer.
-
If the Form W-3 is not
available, sanitize the
page(s) of the PMF
transcript containing the
W-3 record(s) relevant to
the penalty and send the
filer a copy with an
explanation.
-
Do not submit a request to
WIRS for copies of the
Forms W-3.
-
If
the filer requests a copy of
the Forms W-2 which resulted
in the assessment, request the
document from WIRS using the
microfilm sequence number(s)
provided on the PMF
transcript. Indicate W-3 and
all W-2s in the remarks area.
Inform the filer that it will
take about 6 weeks to obtain
microfilm copies of the Forms
W-2.
-
When the Forms W-2 are
received from WIRS, count
to verify that the penalty
agrees with the number of
documents processed
(eliminate blanks, voids,
and subtotal forms).
-
If the volume is lower
than the penalty assessed,
send the documents to the
filer with Letter 1948C
explaining that the
penalty will be adjusted
accordingly. (See LEM
20.1.7.3.4.6)
-
The following information will
be useful when working
responses to Form W-2 magnetic
media penalty cases. However,
see LEM 20.1.7.3.4.6 for
further information.
-
If the filer questions why
the number of Forms W-2
penalized does not agree
with the volume entered on
Form(s) W-3 by the filer,
explain that the penalty
is based on the actual
number of return processed
by SSA. Blanks, voids, and
subtotal forms are not
counted. In addition, the
discrepancy may have
occurred because the
preparer entered an
incorrect figure on Form
W-3.
-
If the response indicates
that only magnetic media
was filed or if the filer
does not seem to
understand why the penalty
was assessed, send a copy
of the Form W-3 along with
Letter 1948C explaining
that the W-3 is a records
of the paper forms filed
with SSA.
-
If the filer used a prior
year Form W-3, check the
signature date to
determine what year the
returns were submitted.
20.1.7.3.4.7 (08-20-1998)
Penalty for Failure to File
in the Proper Format
(Unprocessable Returns)
-
The penalty for failure to
file in the proper format is
assessed for unprocessable
paper returns and magnetic
media returns identified by
the campus and MCC. This
penalty is manually assessed
by the campus (CP215 or CP
15). It is not preceded by
Notice 972CG.
-
For both paper and
magnetic media, the
documents are returned to
the filer (during initial
processing) along with a
letter explaining the
problem and requesting
correction and
resubmission by a specific
date.
Note:
For paper returns, only
a sample of the
unprocessable returns
are returned to the
filer to identify the
problem. However, the
filer is asked to
resubmit the entire
submission.
-
Filers are also advised of
the applicable penalties
for not resubmitting the
returns timely. If
processable returns are
submitted beyond the date
requested, the filer is
subject to a late filing
penalty.
-
Returns are referred to
the penalty unit for the
improper format penalty if
they are still
unprocessable at the
processing cut off for the
year.
-
The penalty will be
assessed at $50 per return
and is computed by
multiplying the number of
unprocessable returns by
$50. See LEM 20.1.7.3.4.8.
The de minimis exception
does not apply to the
improper format penalty.
-
The penalty unit will receive
copies of no response and
unsatisfactory responses to
Letters 1865C from Receipt and
Control along with the Forms
1096 and the payee documents
that cannot be processed.
-
MCC will refer Forms 4804 to
the campus for assessment of
the penalty. The case is
referred to the campus for the
penalty only if the filer does
not return the file to MCC or
if the file was returned but
was still unprocessable at the
end of the processing year.
-
MCC will refer to the campuses
any unresolved, unreturned
solicitations for corrected
magnetic media (MCC will purge
the case and upon nonreceipt
will notify the campus of the
DLN) . The campus will send
CP215 to the submitter
assessing the proposed penalty
amounts. Any corrected tapes
will be submitted to MCC from
the campus asking for input as
to the correctness of the
assessment.
-
If
it appears that the filer only
corrected the sample of
unprocessable paper returns
that were mailed with Letter
1865C, the campus may contact
the filer to clarify that the
entire submission must be
resubmitted (per Letter
1865C). Allow the filer 30
days to respond before
assessing the penalty.
-
Prior to assessing the penalty
for unprocessable magnetic
media returns (Form 4804),
check IDRS or MFTRA for the
presence of a late filing or
magnetic media penalty
assessed for the same number
of returns filed on paper.
-
If an assessment is
present, request a PMF
transcript for manual
assessments to determine
if the penalty is for the
same returns.
-
If confirmed, notate the
date and Penalty
Considered on the 4804,
associate with the closed
case and refile. See LEM
20.1.7.3.4.8.
-
If it is determined that
the previous assessment is
for different returns,
assess the penalty based
on the information on
Forms 4804/4802.
-
Only the actual returns which
cannot be processed will be
subject to the failure to file
in the proper format penalty.
Receipt and Control will
separate the submission into
processable and unprocessable.
-
Any processable returns
will have been input with
original Form 1096.
-
The unprocessable returns
will be forwarded by the
Penalty Unit for
assessment action with a
photocopy of Form 1096.
Note:
The "Total number of
documents" filed on Form
1096 should have been
changed by Receipt and
Control to reflect the
number of unprocessable
documents subject to
penalty.
-
Verify the number of
unprocessable documents
subject to penalty by
excluding voided and blank
forms, and returns not
required to be filed by
law based on the dollar
amount reported or exempt
status. See Exhibit
20.1.7–4.
-
MCC will count the entire
submission as
unprocessable and, if the
number of documents cannot
be discerned, will
proposed the maximum
penalty with affirmation
from Headquarter
Operations. Prior year
submissions will also be
considered.
If
returns are received from
Receipt and Control which are
processable, return the entire
submission to the IRP Unit in
Receipt and Control with an
explanation.
-
The penalty is to be assessed
on the Civil Penalty Module.
See IRM 20.1.7.1.6.2.
-
If the unprocessable
returns were also filed
late the first time they
were filed, check PMFOL to
see if an extension was
also granted, for the
return type and tax year
in question. If an
extension was also
granted, use reference
number 503. If an
extension was not granted,
use reference number 506.
-
If a sufficient number of
returns were submitted to
require magnetic media
filing, check PMFOL to see
if a waiver was granted
for the return type and
tax year in question. See
LEM 20.1.7.3.4.8. If a
magnetic media waiver was
also granted, use
reference number 503. If a
waiver was not granted,
use reference number 508.
-
If the returns were filed
late and the volume was
large enough to require
magnetic media filing,
check for the extension
and waiver. If both were
granted, use reference
number 503. If neither was
granted, use reference
number 511. If an
extension was granted but
no waiver, use reference
number 508. If a waiver
was granted but no
extension, use reference
number 506.
-
If
the assessment is input on or
before July 1 of filing year,
the campus should include a
quick note with the notice.
The quick note should contain
the following statement: The
penalty was assessed at $50
per return but it will be
reduced if the corrected forms
are submitted on or before
August 1, 20XX.
-
Processable returns (paper)
resubmitted after the date
requested in Letter 1865C may
be referred to the penalty
unit for assessment of the
late filing penalty. MCC may
also refer these cases to the
campus with Form 4804 for
assessment. MCC will separate
cases subject to late filing
penalty from the subject to
unprocessable penalty. See LEM
20.1.7.3.4.3.
-
In this situation, the
penalty unit should assess
a late filing penalty
(reference number 500).
-
If the filer filed more
than 250 returns (paper),
use PMFOL to determine
whether a waiver was
granted. If the waiver was
granted, assess the late
filing penalty only. If no
waiver was granted, assess
the combination
late/magnetic media
penalty using reference
number 504.
20.1.7.3.4.8 (08-20-1998)
Receiving Responses
(Unprocessable Returns)
-
Generally filers must
establish reasonable cause for
the penalty to be abated. See
IRM 20.1.7.9.1 for definitions
of reasonable cause and IRM
20.1.7.9.2.9 for the special
abatement conditions. See LEM
20.1.7.3.4.8 for further
instructions.
-
If
the filer submits corrected
returns in response to the
penalty notice, Receipt and
Control will notate the
CP15/215 Processable returns
submitted and also notate the
received date and the number
of returns submitted.
-
Review the filer's
response to determine if
the explanation
establishes reasonable
cause.
-
If the filer's explanation
does not establish
reasonable cause, and the
received date indicates
that the $50 penalty
should be reduced (see LEM
20.1.7.3.4.8), recalculate
the penalty at $15 or $30
per return as appropriate.
The penalty should only be
adjusted for the number of
processable returns
received as noted on the
CP15/215.
-
Also include the following
explanation: We received
your corrected information
returns on . The penalty
you were previously
assessed for filing
unprocessable Forms has
been reduced to $XX.XX
per return. You will
receive an adjusted
balance due notice.
-
If
the filer submits processable
returns in response to the
notice but the explanation
provided does not meet
reasonable cause, disallow the
claim.
20.1.7.3.4.9 (08-20-1998)
Penalty for Missing and
Incorrect TINs
-
Filers who file an information
return with a missing TIN, or
a TIN determined to be
incorrect or not currently
issued by the Service, are
subject to a penalty of $50
per return.
-
After the TIN validation
process is performed to
identify payee records with
missing and incorrect
TINs/names, this data is
transmitted to the Payer
Master File for inclusion in
the penalty proposal notice.
-
See Exhibit 20.1.7–5 for
details on how the Service
performs TIN validation to
determine which TINs are
incorrect or not currently
issued.
Note:
When a TIN is identified as
incorrect, either the TIN or
name may be incorrect.
-
A
paper or tape listing of payee
records with missing or
incorrect TINs is sent to the
filer along with the proposal
notice. Publication 1586,
Reasonable Cause Regulations
and Requirements as They Apply
to Missing and Incorrect TINs,
is also included in this
mailing. It provides a
detailed explanation of the
action the filer is required
to take upon receiving the
listing.
-
A
payer making a reportable
payment to a payee, the payee
must make an initial
solicitation for the payee's
TIN at the time the account is
opened.
-
If
the payer does not receive a
TIN as a result of the initial
solicitation, he/she must
complete a first annual
solicitation by December 31 of
the year in which the account
was opened, or ny January 31
of the following year if the
account was opened in
December.
-
If
the payee does not receive a
TIN as a result of the first
annual solicitation, he/she
must complete a second annual
solicitation by December 31 of
the year immediately following
the calendar year in which the
account was opened.
-
Filers are required to review
payee accounts to verify
whether or not they have
completed the required
solicitations (request TINs
from payees) to show
reasonable cause to have the
penalty waived or abated.
20.1.7.3.4.10 (08-20-1998)
Receiving Responses (Missing
and Incorrect TINs)
-
See IRM 20.1.7.9.2.2 for the
general solicitation
requirements for TINs and the
general reasonable cause
criteria in IRM 20.1.7.9.2.3
to determine if the penalty
should be waived or abated.
-
Also see LEM 20.1.7.9.1 for
the special abatement
criteria.
-
If
the filer's response indicates
they do not understand why
they received the notice
and/or what actions they are
required to take, provide a
brief explanation in Letter
1948C and refer them to the
Publication 1586.
-
If
the filer has included
corrected returns for
prior years in
response to the notice, advise
the filer that corrections for
name/TINs are not required for
prior years. Filers should be
advised to update their
records and reflect the
correct data on any returns
filed in the future.
-
If
corrected returns are provided
for
current year
returns, route them to the
Receipt and Control Function
for processing if they are
received prior to the campus
Program Completion Date (PCD).
Note:
Filers are required to
submit other corrections for
information returns (e.g.,
money amounts) for current
year returns.
-
If
the filer submits examples of
garbled information on the TIN
listing apologize for the
inconvenience and advise that
no action is necessary.
-
Filers must compare the
listings of incorrect and/or
not currently issued TINs
received from the Service with
their records to determine if
the name/TIN combination
included on the listings
agrees or disagrees with their
records.
-
In
general, if an account number
is provided on the listing,
the filer need only identify
any account or accounts with
that corresponding number or
designation that has the same
name/TIN combination. If no
account number is provided,
the filer must use reasonable
care to identify all accounts
that relate to the same
incorrect name/TIN
combination.
-
If
the name/TIN combination on
the listing agrees with their
records, the filer must
perform the required annual
solicitation (see IRM
20.7.9.2.4) if not completed
previously.
-
If
the name/TIN combination on
the listing disagrees with its
records, the filer must
determine whether:
-
An error was made when
filing the information
return. If so, the filer
must include the correct
information on any future
information returns,
-
The information in their
records has changed since
filing the information
return. If so, the filer
must include that
information on any future
information returns,
-
The Service changed the
information during
processing. If so, the
filer should notate their
records and take no
further action.
-
In all the instances
outlined above, the filer
should notate their
records and provide this
information in their reply
to the 972CG Notice.
20.1.7.3.4.11 (08-20-1998)
Notice 972CG, Notice of
Proposed Civil Penalty
-
Notice 972CG, Notice of
Proposed Civil Penalty, is
mailed to give filers an
opportunity to establish
reasonable cause for waiver of
penalties prior to assessment.
The notice includes proposed
penalties for failure to file
timely, failure to file on
magnetic media and missing and
incorrect TINs. Notice 972CG
is assigned the reference
number which corresponds to
the penalty proposed, e.g.
reference number 500 for the
failure to file timely
penalty.
-
Filers are allowed 45 days to
respond to the notice and to
submit an explanation as to
why the penalty should be
waived. Filers may also submit
a payment if they fully or
partially agree or sign a
consent to allow the Service
to send a bill for the balance
due. *NOTE-The decision to
assess or not assess the
penalty should not be made
based on the amount of payment
received. Reasonable Cause
Criteria must be applied in
all instances.
-
The penalty will be assessed
against filers who do not
submit a satisfactory
explanation or who fail to
respond to the notice. All
penalties will be manually
assessed following the
procedures in IRM
20.1.7.1.6.2.
-
Notice 972CG is not posted to
the master file or shown on
any IDRS or CFOL Command
Codes. Campuses may open an
IDRS control base on MFT 13 or
55 after mailing the notices
immediately upon receipt of a
reply. This will prevent a
delay in taking necessary
interim or closing actions
after the response is
reviewed. When the control
base is opened enter Notice
972CG or "972CGREPLY in the
ACTIVITY and OTHE as the
category code. (Special
Category Code CVPN should be
established for these cases).
-
See IRM 20.1.7.6.3 for
procedures that may be
required to create entities if
there is no IMF or BMF account
to penalize or to create a
Civil Penalty Name Line (IMF
accounts only) if it has not
already been established on
the Master File. These
procedures are necessary to
prevent unpostable conditions.
-
Campuses should maintain a
suspense file for Notice 972CG
which contains the:
-
Notice,
-
TIN listing (if
applicable)
-
The PMF transcripts, and
-
CP215/15A, Summary of Your
1999 Information Return
Penalties.
-
These file should be
maintained in TIN order.
-
Files should be maintained
for 180 days.
20.1.7.3.4.11.1
(08-20-1998)
Receiving Responses
(Notice 972CG)
-
Review responses to Notice
972CG to determine if the
penalty should be waived for
reasonable cause in the same
manner as replies to penalty
assessment notice
(CP215/15). See the
appropriate section in IRM
20.1.7.3.4. to respond to
replies for penalties
proposed for late filing,
magnetic media, and TINs.
Also, see IRM 20.1.7.1.6.2.
for complete adjustment
actions.
-
Also see IRM 20.1.7.9.1 for
reasonable cause criteria
and IRM 20.1.7.9.2.9 for
special abatement
conditions.
-
Filers may be granted an
extension for up 30 days to
respond to the notice. For
notices that were initially
undeliverable, or required a
recreate (see IRM
20.1.7.1.6.3.4), the new
notice date is the date
stamped when the notice is
mailed a second time. See
LEM 20.7.3.4.
-
Campuses must review replies
fully and give filers the
opportunity to submit
additional information
regarding their case before
making a decision of whether
or not to assess the
penalty.
-
If the explanation
establishes reasonable
cause:
-
Send letter 1948C
explaining the decision,
-
Input a TC 290.00 on MFT
13 or 55, using Blocking
Series 15, for BMF
accounts or on MFT 55
using BS 05 for IMF
accounts
-
Use Reason Code (RC) 62
and/or the appropriate
4th position Reason Code
(Exhibit 20.1.1.-3),
Hold Code (HC) 3,
Penalty Reference Number
(PRN) from the Notice
972CG and amount 0.00 .
-
File Notice 972CG,
correspondence, and a
print of the Letter
1948C with your
adjustment document.
-
If the filer agrees with
part of the penalty and
establishes reasonable cause
for the remainder
(reasonable cause not denied
for any amounts)
-
Send letter 1948C
explaining the decision,
an explanation of how to
avoid future penalties
and that the balance due
notice will follow (if
not paid in full). Use
Reason Code 62 and the
appropriate Penalty
Reason Code (Exhibit
20.1.1–3),
-
Input the assessment on
MFT 13 or 55 for the
agreed penalty amount
using BS 52 if it's a
first assessment on the
module, or BS 53 if a
previous adjustment is
already present.
-
Use Reason Code 62
and/or the appropriate
4th position reason code
for the amount being
waived, HC 3, PRN from
972CG and penalty amount
for the part of the
penalty being assessed.
-
Monitor the assessment
to ensure that it posts.
-
If the explanation does not
establish reasonable cause
or the abatement request is
partially denied:
-
Input the assessment for
any penalty amount for
which the filer did not
provide an acceptable
explanation.
-
Do not use Reason Code
62 if the penalty is
being assessed in full,
and use Hold Code 0.
-
If waiver or abatement
is partially denied, use
the appropriate Reason
Code(s) for the portion
being waived/abated and
Hold Code 3. Use the PRN
from the 972CG.
-
Input a separate
transaction using TC
290, 0 , BS 98, RC 62 in
the 1st position, do not
enter a 4th position
code and HC 3. To delay
the posting of the
second transaction for
one cycle use Posting
Code Delay Code 1 with
this transaction.
-
Send Letter 854C stating
the reason(s) the
explanation was not
accepted. Also state the
penalty amount assessed
and that a balance due
notice will follow.
Correspondence should
only be sent to the
responsible individual
and not to a joint
account. See IRM
20.1.7.1.9.
-
File the case
-
Monitor the assessments
to ensure that they
post.
-
See (12)-(16) below
before assessing the
penalty if the reply
indicates that the filer
is no longer in business
or there was a change in
business organization,
i.e. partnership to
corporation. (Assess the
penalty unless criteria
in (12)-(16) below
applies.)
-
Use care when adjusting
penalty amounts when two or
more penalties (late,
magnetic media, or
TIN)
apply to the
same
document.
Example:
If 500 Forms 1099–DIV were
filed late (April 5) and
fifty of these returns had
incorrect TINs, the
proposed penalty on Notice
972CG would be calculated
at 50 x $50 (TINs) plus
450 x $15 (late). If the
filer submits a
satisfactory explanation
for the 50 incorrect TINs,
but not for filing late,
the penalty should be
recalculated at 500 x $15
for the CP215/15 notice.
-
If a payment was received,
the amount will be notated
on the response page by the
Deposit function.
Acknowledge any payment
received in correspondence
with the filer.
-
If a full payment is
received and there are no
disagreed items or a partial
payment is received and the
filer submits a satisfactory
explanation for the
remainder, input the
adjustment on MFT 13 or 55.
Use Hold Code 3
-
See LEM 20.7.1.6.3.4 for
purge dates
-
If Freeze Code —Z is on the
account, send the case to
Criminal Investigation. Do
not assess the penalty, will
go unpostable.
-
Prior to assessing the
penalty, check for
undeliverables, (see IRM
20.1.7.1.7), or no response
cases.
-
Use BMFOL to check Form 941
(MFT 01) modules for the
presence of Collection
Compliance transaction:
-
A TC 530 with CC10
(defunct corporation),
-
TC 530 with CC07
(bankrupt/insolvent
corporation), (See IRM
20.1.7.9.6 for more
information on
bankruptcies.) or
-
TC 480/7890 (Offer in
Compromise pending
(OIC)).
-
If a TC 530 with either
closing code is present,
do not assess the
penalty.
-
Check the tax year in
question and subsequent
years. If an unreversed TC
480 is present, check for
the case file assignment
number and notify the
responsible Collection
Compliance function of the
pending assessment.
Collection Compliance must
include this assessment in
the OIC.
-
A TC 480 may be reversed
with:
-
TC 481 — OIC requested,
-
TC 482 — OIC withdrawn,
or
-
TC 483 — Correction of
an erroneous TC 480.
Note:
Since it is not unusual to
have more than one TC 480
posted in a module, a
careful review of the
entire module should be
done before taking any
action.
-
Also, apply the criteria in
(14) if a filer's response
to Notice 972CG indicates
they are either a defunct of
bankrupt corporation; check
for the appropriate
transaction code.
-
A monthly report should be
submitted to the Penalty
Analyst in the campus to
measure how effective Notice
972CG is in prompting a
response from filers. The
report should be submitted
by the 10th of the month for
the previous month's
activity. Title the report
Notice 972CG Monthly
Activity Report . Enter the
name and the date at the top
of the report. The campus
should provide monthly as
well as cumulative totals
for each category.
-
Number of Notice 972CG
mailed and referred to
Exam (RTC/FDIC Notices
during mailout), total
Notices mailed and
referred to Exam.
-
Number of receipts
(replies) Notice 972CG
-
Number of replies/no
responses as follows:
(1) Reasonable Cause
Waiver Granted, (2)
Reasonable Cause Waiver
Denied — assessment for
full amount, (3)
Reasonable Cause Waiver
Partially Denied —
Partial Assessment, (4)
Penalty Waived for Other
than Reasonable Cause,
(5) Partially Agreed —
no disallowed items, (6)
Fully Agreed, (7) Case
closed to Exam, (8)
Purged-assessment input
for no reply and
undeliverable cases, (9)
Open replies (Cum
receipts minus items
5–10), (10) No reply
suspense (line 3 minus
CUM receipts minus line
12), (11) Total of items
5 through 14 on report.
-
Receipts (Replies) to CP
215/15.
-
Abatements (after
CP215/15): Full, Partial
Referrals to Appeals,
Number (abatements)
requested or done by
Appeals.
-
Only count notices in
one category.
-
The monthly report
should continue until
the campus has purged no
reply cases and resolved
all open cases (reply
received) for Notice
972CG. The penalty
analyst will notify the
unit when to stop
reporting for abatements
of CP215/15.
20.1.7.4 (08-20-1998)
Failure to Furnish Correct Payee
Statements IRC Section 6722
-
IRC section 6722 provides for a
penalty when a payee statement is
not timely or correctly furnished,
The $50 penalty is imposed for
each failure to:
-
Furnish a payee statement on
or before the due date to the
person to whom the statement
must be furnished,
-
Furnish all information
required, and
-
Furnish correct information.
- No
more than one penalty will be
imposed per payee statement, even
though a statement may contain
more than one failure.
-
For purposes of IRC section 6722,
the term payee statement means any
statement required to be furnished
as described in Reg.
301.6722–1(d)(2).
-
The total amount imposed on any
filer for all failures to furnish
a payee statement during any
calendar year shall not exceed
$100,000.
- A
composite
substitute payee statement
is a single document
created by the filer to reflect
several types of payments made to
the same payee. Each composite
statement shall be treated as
though each type of payment (or
other required information) were a
separate statement with each type
of payment being subject to the
penalty.
-
This statement must be on a form
acceptable to the Service. See
Publication 1179, Specifications
for Paper Document Reporting and
Paper Substitutes for Forms 1096,
1098, 1099 Series, and Forms 5498
and W-2G.
-
The $50 penalty for failure to
furnish payee statements is not
reduced if returns are corrected
or filed after the due date.
-
The IRC section 6722 penalty
should not be imposed if an error
or omission is inconsequential.
See IRM Section 20.7.3.3.
20.1.7.4.1 (08-20-1998)
Intentional Disregard
-
The Intentional Disregard of the
Rules and Regulations Penalty
applies when the
facts and
circumstances show
that the filer
knowingly
or willfully failed
to comply with the requirements
of IRC sections 6722.
-
Intentional disregard occurs
when a filer who knows, or
should know of a rule or
regulation, chooses to ignore
its requirements. The facts
should show the filer:
-
Was required to provide a
statement,
-
Knew or should have known of
the requirement to provide
the statement, and
-
Consciously chose not to
provide the statement or
recklessly disregarded (i.e.
ignored) the duty to provide
the statement.
-
Treas. Reg. 301.6721–1(f)(3)(i)
provides that a pattern of
failures indicates intentional
disregard. The greater the
number of failures, the greater
the likelihood some of those
failures could be due to
intentional disregard.
Additional indications of the
existence of intentional
disregard are:
-
Did the filer correct the
failure promptly after the
discovery of the failure,
-
Did the filer correct the
failure within thirty days
after notification of the
failure by the Service,
-
Did the filer avoid an
administrative
inconvenience, and
-
Was the cost of compliance
greater than the IRC section
6722(a) penalty.
-
Intentional disregard may exist
when it would be less expensive
to pay the penalty under 6722(a)
rather than comply with the
requirement to provide a
statement. Treas. Reg.
301.6722–1(c)(2). Check payee's
prior history of compliance to
determine intentional disregard.
-
The Intentional Disregard of the
Rules and Regulations Penalty
amounts to:
-
$100 for each payee
statement required to be
filed, or if greater:
-
10 percent of the amount of
income required to be
reported on payee statements
for dividends, patronage
dividends, interest, fishing
boat operators, royalties,
and wage and tax statement,
or
-
5 percent of the amount
required to be reported on
the payee statements for
brokers, exchange of
partnership interest, or
disposition of donated
property payments.
-
Form 8300
Penalty.
The Intentional Disregard
penalty for failing to provide a
payor of cash with a statement
as required by IRC sections
6050I(e) is the greater of $100
or 10 percent of the amount
required to be provided on the
statement.
-
These penalties are asserted
by field Examination
personnel.
-
The taxpayer may be offered
an administrative
preassessment appeal.
-
There is no maximum dollar
limitation for the Intentional
Disregard of the Rules and
Regulations Penalty under IRC
section 6722.
-
No more than one penalty per
failure can be imposed, even if
there is more than one failure
on the same statement.
20.1.7.4.2 (08-20-1998)
Exceptions and Special Rules
-
The penalty shall not be
assessed if an error or omission
is inconsequential. An error or
omission is inconsequential when
the failure does not prevent:
-
The timely receipt of
correct information, or
-
The payee from putting the
information to its intended
use.
-
Errors or omissions are never
considered inconsequential if
they relate to:
-
A dollar amount,
-
A significant item in the
payee address,
-
Use of the appropriate form
for the information
provided, whether or not it
is an acceptable substitute
for the official IRS form,
and/or
-
The delivery of the
information return to the
payee either in person or by
first class mail (in a
mailer which alerts the
payee that the statement is
enclosed) under the
following: IRC section
6042(c), Returns Regarding
Payments of Dividends and
Corporate Earnings and
Profits, IRC section
6044(e), Returns Regarding
Payments of Patronage
Dividends, IRC section
6049(c), Returns Regarding
Payments of Interest, and or
IRC section 6050N(b),
Returns Regarding Payments
of Royalties.
20.1.7.5 (08-20-1998)
Failure to Comply with Other
Information Reporting
Requirements IRC Section 6723
-
For any information return or
payee statement due (without
regard to extensions) , a penalty
of $50 per failure will be imposed
for each failure to provide all
the required information timely.
- No
more than one penalty can be
imposed for the same return. For
example, if a return has more than
one error or omission and the
penalty amount for those failures
differs, the penalty will be
imposed at the higher amount.
- A
penalty of $50 is imposed for
failure to comply timely with
specified information reporting
requirements or for each failure
to include correct information.
The maximum penalty for failure to
comply with all specified
information reporting requirements
is $100,000 per year.
-
Multiple penalties may be imposed
on one document if the failures
relate to more than one of the
following requirements:
-
IRC section
6050K(c)1–notification of
exchange of partnership
interest,
-
IRC section 6109–supplying
identifying numbers, (1)
includes his/her TIN on a
return, statement or document
other than an information
return or payee statement, (2)
furnishes his or her TIN to
another person, (3) the TIN of
any other person whose number
is required to be shown on a
return, statement of document
other than an information
return or payee statement, (4)
the TIN of a return preparer.
-
IRC section 215–Alimony, etc.,
Payments, (1) the person
receiving separate maintenance
is required to furnish his or
her TIN to the individual
making separate maintenance
payments, and (2) the person
making the separate
maintenance payment is
required to furnish on their
return the TIN of the person
receiving the separate
maintenance payment.
-
IRC section 6109(e)-Furnishing
Number for Certain Dependents,
Include on his/her return, the
TIN for any dependent who is
claimed as an exemption on an
income tax return, and has
reached 1 year of age before
the close of the taxable year.
-
However, no more than one penalty
per document may be imposed if the
failure could be penalized for
both :
-
Failure to timely comply, or
-
Failure to include all the
required information.
20.1.7.5.1 (08-20-1998)
Intentional Disregard
-
The Intentional Disregard
penalty as it applies to IRC
section 6723 was repealed by
P.L. 101–239. For returns and
statements required to be filed
after December 31, 1989,
Intentional Disregard will not
be considered.
20.1.7.5.2 (08-20-1998)
Exceptions and Rules
-
An inconsequential error or
omission is not considered a
failure to comply with a
specified information reporting
requirement. Therefore, the
penalty shall not be assessed.
-
The term inconsequential means
any failure that does not make
it difficult for the Service to
put the information to its
intended use, or prevent a payee
from timely receiving correct
information and reporting it on
his or her return.
20.1.7.6 (08-20-1998)
Regulations Requiring Returns on
Magnetic Media IRC section
6011(e)
-
Information
Returns::
-
The magnetic media filing
requirement for Forms 1099
changed as a result of OBRA
'89. A filer must file on
magnetic media when filing
more than 250 returns of the
same type.
-
If
a filer timely filed paper
returns, but was required to
file magnetic media returns,
the $50 failure to file
penalty will apply to the
number of returns, of one
type, required to be filed
that exceed 250.
20.1.7.7 (08-20-1998)
Failure to File Certain
Information Returns,
Registration Statements, etc.
IRC section 6652(e)
-
The penalty for failing to file
information returns required in
connection with certain plans of
deferred compensation applies for
each failure to file Forms 1099–R
due after December 31, 1998.
-
Specific information relating to
Tax Exempt/Government Entities
will be addressed by Tax
Exempt/Government Entities.
20.1.7.8 (08-20-1998)
Failure to Provide Reports on
IRAs/Annuities
- As
the result of the Deficit
Reduction Act of 1984, (effective
December 31, 1984) the trustee of
an Individual Retirement Account,
the issuer of an IRA, or
Simplified Employment Pension
(SEP) may be assessed a penalty of
$50 for each failure to:
-
Furnish or file a return (Form
5498) within the time and
manner prescribed, or
-
Furnish or file a disclosure
statement, a governing
instrument, or an amendment.
-
There is no limitation to the
amount of the penalty for returns
required under IRC section
6693(a).
-
The penalty under IRC section
6693(a) shall not apply if the
trustee or issuer of an annuity
establishes reasonable cause. See
IRM 20.1.7.9.
20.1.7.8.1 (08-20-1998)
Overstatement of Designated
Nondeductible Contributions
IRC section 6693(b)
-
IRC section 408(o)(4) generally
requires any individual who
makes a nondeductible
contribution to an individual
retirement plan for any taxable
year, to file Form 8606,
Nondeductible IRAs
(Contributions, Distributions
and Basis).
-
A $100 penalty may apply if
an individual overstates the
amount of their
nondeductible contributions
for any taxable year.
-
The penalty may be abated if
the overstatement is due to
reasonable cause. See IRM
20.1.7.9.1.
-
Deficiency procedures do not
apply.
20.1.7.9 (08-20-1998)
Waivers, Definitions and Special
Rules IRC Section 6724
-
Generally, an information
reporting penalty may be waived if
it can be shown that the error was
due to reasonable cause and not
due to willful neglect.
-
See IRM 20.1.1.3 for discussion of
Penalty Relief. The term Penalty
Relief includes Reasonable Cause,
Statutory Exception,
Administrative Waiver, or Service
Error.
20.1.7.9.1 (08-20-1998)
Reasonable Cause
-
The Service may
waive (abate or not assess) an
information return penalty when
a filer requests a waiver of the
penalty and establishes
reasonable cause. See LEM
20.1.7.9.1
" **NOTE–EVENTS
OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001, MUST BE
CONSIDERED WHEN APPLYING THIS
PROVISION."
-
If the request properly
establishes reasonable cause,
the penalty may be abated using
normal procedures. See IRM
20.1.7.1.5.
-
If reasonable cause is not
established, disallow the
request using normal procedures.
See IRM 20.1.7.1.5.
-
If additional information is
needed to substantiate a request
for the waiver of a penalty due
to reasonable cause, contact the
taxpayer.
-
In all cases involving
unauthorized third party
requests, correspond directly
with the taxpayer to inform them
of the action taken. Send Letter
135C to the unauthorized third
party explaining that you have
responded directly to the
taxpayer and include a paragraph
in the taxpayer's letter
requesting that the taxpayer
notify the third party of our
direct reply to the taxpayer.
See LEM 20.1.7.9
-
If the correspondence contains
the penalty of perjury language
it must contain the affected
taxpayer's signature or the
signature of the taxpayer's
authorized representative.
Return correspondence to the
taxpayer with Letter 1382C. The
signature requirements are as
follows:
-
For
corporations
, the statement must be
signed by the president,
vice-president, treasurer,
assistant treasurer, chief
accounting officer or other
officer duly authorized to
sign returns and other
documents. The fact that an
individual within the
corporation signed the
statement shall be accepted
as evidence that the
individual is authorized to
sign on behalf of the
corporation (IRC section
6062).
-
For
partnerships,
the
statement may be signed by
any one of the partners.
-
For joint
individual accounts,
the statement must contain
the signature of one of the
taxpayers who signed the
original return to be
considered a valid request.
-
Reasonable cause for the
information return penalties
exists when :
-
the filer acted in a
responsible manner, both
before and after the failure
occurred, and
-
There are significant
mitigating factors, or
-
The failure was the result
of circumstances beyond the
filer's control.
-
Acting in a
Responsible Manner
would include exercising the
same degree of care that a
reasonably prudent person (or
organization) would use in the
course of its business in
determining filing obligations
and in handling account
information such as account
numbers and balances. The filer
must act in a responsible manner
both before and after the
failure occurs.
-
Acting in a responsible manner
also includes taking steps to
avoid the failure, for example:
-
Requesting appropriate
extensions of time to file
when practical to avoid the
failure,
-
Attempting to prevent a
failure if it was
foreseeable,
-
Acting to remove an
impediment or the cause of
the failure, and
-
Correcting the failure as
promptly as possible,
generally within 30 days.
-
Where a penalty is imposed for
missing or incorrect TINS, a
filer must comply with special
rules for acting in a
responsible manner. See IRM
20.1.7.9.2.
-
When reviewing a filer's request
for a waiver, the following
questions must be addressed to
determine if the filer has acted
in a responsible manner.
-
Do the reasons address the
penalty that was assessed?
-
Does the length of time
between the event cited as a
reason and the filing date
negate the event's effect?
-
Does the continued operation
of a business after the
event that caused the
filer's noncompliance negate
the event's effect?
-
Should the event that caused
the filer's noncompliance or
increased liability have
reasonably been anticipated?
-
Was the penalty the result
of carelessness or did the
filer appear to have made an
honest mistake?
(Carelessness and
forgetfulness are the same
as civil willful neglect and
are not examples of ordinary
business care and prudence).
-
Has the filer provided
sufficient detail (dates,
relationships) to determine
whether they exercised
ordinary business care and
prudence?
-
Is a non-liable person being
blamed for the filer's
noncompliance? What is the
nature of the relationship
between the taxpayer and the
individual? Is the
individual an employee of
the taxpayer or an
independent third party such
as an accountant or lawyer?
-
Has the filer documented all
pertinent facts, i.e., death
certificate, doctor's
statement, insurance
statement for proof of fire,
etc.?
-
Does the filer have a
history of being assessed
the same penalty?
-
Could the filer have
requested an extension or
filed an amended return?
-
A waiver should not be
automatically granted where the
filer claims ignorance of the
filing requirements. However,
ignorance of the law may be
considered as one factor which
may indicate that the filer
acted in a responsible manner if
all the other facts support this
contention.
-
Significant
mitigating factors
— For the
filer to establish reasonable
cause under this category, the
filer must show that they acted
in a responsible manner as well
as the existence of a
significant mitigating factor.
Events generally considered to
be significant mitigating
factors include, but are not
limited to:
-
First time filer:
prior to the failure, the filer
had not previously been required
to file this particular form or
statement (See LEM 20.1.7.9. or
-
The filer has a
history of complying
with the information return
reporting requirements. See LEM
20.1.7.9. Significant
consideration is given to:
-
If the filer was previously
penalized under IRC sections
6721, 6722, or 6723.
Example:
failures which are not
penalized because they are
within the " de minimis"
exception are not
considered to have been
penalized for purposes of
evaluating a filer's
compliance history.
-
A filer may not continually
rely on the same explanation
to establish reasonable
cause, when the filer's
compliance history indicates
a pattern of failures. A
filer is expected to take
significant steps to prevent
future failures of the same
type. Consider the
Intentional Disregard
provisions.
-
Determine if the filer was
previously penalized. If so,
did the error rate decrease
from one year to the next?
Consider the Intentional
Disregard provisions.
-
The filer's history of
compliance should be
considered whether or not
the filer specifically
requests abatement on this
basis.
-
Compliance history must be
considered, along with the
other evidence provided, to
determine if the penalty
should be abated. The fact
that the filer previously
had a penalty should not be
the only criteria used to
decide if the penalty should
be abated/waived.
Example:
A good compliance history
may benefit a filer who
can show that they acted
in a responsible manner,
but cannot show that an
event beyond the filer's
control caused the
failure.
-
However, if the filer can
show that he/she acted in a
responsible manner and the
failure was due to an event
beyond the filer's control,
then a penalty in a prior
year should not be used as
cause not to abate/waive the
penalty.
-
The filer contacted a tax
advisor who was competent on the
specific tax matter, furnished
necessary and relevant
information, and was then
incorrectly advised that the
filing of a return was not
required. If the filer exercises
normal business care and
prudence based on its
information and knowledge in
determining whether to secure
further advise, reasonable cause
may apply.
-
Events beyond the
filer's control
— for the
filer to establish reasonable
cause under this category,
the
filer must show that it acted in
a responsible manner,as
well as the event being beyond
the filer's control. Events
generally considered beyond the
control of the filer include
(but are not limited to ) the
following.
-
Actions by the
Service.
To establish an event beyond the
filer's control as the result of
Actions by the Service,
the filer must show it relied on
erroneous written information
provided by the Service. The
filer must also show that
reliance on the written advise
was reasonable and that it
relied in good faith on the
information. The filer must
provide:
-
A copy of the written
information provided by the
Service including the name
of the Service employee, and
the date the erroneous
advice was received,
-
A copy of the request for
information including, the
steps taken and the specific
facts given to the Service,
and the answer received.
-
This information should be
used in determining whether
the taxpayer has shown
reasonable cause for taking
a position on the return
giving rise to the penalty.
-
Reasonable cause
will not be
established if the filer did
not provide the Service with
all the facts and
circumstances when
requesting the advice.
-
Reasonable cause
may be
established if the filer did
not file a return after
receiving erroneous
information from the Service
other than written,
or the filer timely
requested necessary tax
forms and instructions, and
the Service did not provide
them timely.
-
Actions of an
Agent.
For a filer to establish events
beyond the filer's control as
the result of
Actions of an Agent
(imputed reasonable cause), the
filer must show that:
-
It exercised reasonable
business judgment when
contacting the agent,
allowing the agent to timely
file correct returns, or
furnish correct payee
statements,
-
The filer provided the agent
with proper information well
in advance of the due date
of the return or statement,
and the agent satisfied the
significant mitigating
factors, or an event beyond
the agent's control criteria
required to establish
reasonable cause.
-
A filer who contracted with
an agent and cannot
establish reasonable cause
based on the actions of the
agent as described above,
may be able to demonstrate
reasonable cause on its own
merits by having an
established history of
complying with the
information reporting
requirements, and otherwise
acting in a responsible
manner both before and after
the failure occurred. See
IRM 20.1.7.9.2.
-
Actions by the
Payee or any other Person. For
the filer to establish reas
onable cause as the result of
actions by the payee or any
other person with
respect to the return or payee
statement, the filer must show
that:
-
The payee, or other person,
failed to provide the
necessary information to the
filer, or
-
The payee, or other person
failed to provide correct
information to the filer.
-
The filer must provide
documentary evidence when
requested by the Service
showing that the failure was
attributable to the payee.
-
See IRM 20.1.7.9.2.5 for
special solicitation
requirements that a filer
must follow to establish
reasonable cause if the
failure of the filer to
provide a TIN was due to the
actions of the payee.
-
The filer contacted a tax
advisor who was competent on
the specific tax matter,
furnished necessary and
relevant information, and
was then incorrectly advised
that the filing of a return
was not required. If the
filer exercises normal
business care and prudence
based on its information and
knowledge in determining
whether to secure further
advice, reasonable cause may
apply.
Unavailability of
business records—the
business records must have been
unavailable as a result of
unforeseen conditions, and in a
manner which would prevent
timely compliance (ordinary at
least a two week period prior to
the due date (or extended due
date) of the information
return), and the unavailability
was caused by a supervening
event.
**NOTE—THE EVENTS OF SEPTEMBER
11, 2001, SHALL BE CONSIDERED IN
ALL DETERMINATIONS
-
A
supervening event includes,
but is not limited to:
-
A
fire or other casualty
that damages the business
records or impairs the
system for processing such
records,
-
A
statutory or regulatory
change that
relates directly to the data
processing and is made so
close to the time the
information return or
statement is required
that for all practical
purposes the
change cannot be made,
-
The
unavoidable absence
(death or serious illness)
of the person with the
sole responsibility
for filing as return
or furnishing a statement.
In the case of a
corporation, estate, trust,
etc., the death or serious
illness must have been that
of an individual having sole
authority
to file the
return (not the individual
preparingthe
return). See LEM 20.1.7.9.
If another person shares
responsibility for filing
the return and that other
person is unaffected by the
event, the event is not an
event beyond the filer's
control.
-
The return was delivered to the
IRS after its due date by the
United States Postal Service if
it was correctly addressed,
mailed, and postmarked before
the due date by the United
States Postal Service, or a
private postal meter, (see LEM
20.1.7.9.) as long as delivery
was within the time period a
document mailed from the same
point of origin ordinarily would
be received if mailed on the
last day prescribed for filing
the return. If the return is
received after the due date, the
filer must establish the return
was deposited in the mail on or
before the due date, the delay
in receiving the return was due
to a delay in the transmission
of the mail, and the cause of
the delay.
-
The taxpayer's statement that
they erroneously addressed their
return to the state taxing
agency
does not in itself
constitute reasonable cause for
filing late, since a properly
addressed envelope is a legal
requirement in determining
timely mailing/filing (IRC
section 7502(a)(2)(B)).
-
Further documentation of the
circumstances that resulted in
the taxpayer misdirecting the
returns must be considered
evidence the taxpayer acted in a
responsible manner and was
nevertheless unable to file on
time.
-
Acceptable
documentation
must include all of the
following:
-
An excellent filing
compliance record,
-
Dated or
certified mail documents
showing filing made to the
state or local taxing agency
on or before the return due
date,
and
-
Evidence that the act of
misdirecting the return was
due to extenuating
circumstances, and not to
carelessness or willful
neglect. An example of an
extenuating circumstance
would be confusion caused by
a death or serious illness
in the immediate family at
the time of filing.
-
Undue Economic
Hardship related to filing on
Magnetic Media.
When a filer with over 250
returns or statements fails to
file on magnetic media as
required, the filer must show
that they failed to file on
magnetic media because of a lack
of hardware and that to meet the
requirement would have caused an
undue economic hardship. See LEM
20.1.7.9. The filer must show
that:
-
The filer attempted to
contract out the magnetic
media filing, and the cost
was prohibitive as
determined on the due date
of the return.
-
The filer supported the
prohibitive costs with two
estimates from unrelated
service bureaus or computer
software/hardware companies.
-
the filer filed the returns
on paper.
-
The undue economic hardship
criteria does not prevent
the filer from establishing
reasonable cause based on
other criteria that would be
applicable to the magnetic
media penalty. However,
caution should be used to
ensure that other reasonable
cause criteria would be
appropriate to the filer's
failure to file on magnetic
media.
-
Additional magnetic media events
which may be considered beyond's
the filer's control include:
-
The filer relied upon an
internal computer system
which encountered major
hardware and/or software
problems.
-
Reasonable cause should
consider the filer's
documentation of the
following: (1) nature and
severity of problems and
efforts to correct in a
timely fashion: (2) timely
and consistent effort
exercised by responsible
officials within the
organization to monitor
problems and execution of
corrective action, and (3)
efforts undertaken by the
filer to meet filing
obligations, including but
not limited to: (a)
contracting out to third
parties, and/or (b) filing
the returns on paper to meet
the due date.
-
Reasonable cause may be met
if the filer provides
documented evidence that
they contacted two service
bureaus and was informed
that service bureaus would
not contract for preparation
of magnetic media
information returns without
contracting for a range of
data processing functions
such as preparation of
payroll/W–2 data, range of
accounting functions such as
preparation of Profit &
Loss, balance sheets, etc.,
and other functions
currently performed by the
filer "in-house" or
contracted to other third
parties.
-
Reasonable cause may be met
if a filer is located in
geographically remote areas
(e.g., Alaska) and has found
it impossible to arrange for
a magnetic media processing
service. Care should be
taken to review filer's
documentation to ensure they
were diligent in repeated
attempts to contract for
such service sufficiently in
advance of the filing due
date.
-
If the filer received an
undue economic hardship
waiver in a prior year,
reasonable cause related to
undue economic hardship will
be determined on a case by
case basis and not
ordinarily be established
for any subsequent year.
-
Also see 20.7.9.2.9 for the
special abatement conditions
that may require abatement of
the penalty whether or not
reasonable cause exists.
20.1.7.9.2 (09-30-2002)
Responsible Manner
-
In general, a filer will have
acted in a
responsible manner if
the filer:
-
Exercised reasonable care
to, determine its filing
obligations, and handle the
account numbers and
balances.
-
Took significant steps to
avoid a failure, such as
Requested an extension of
time to file; attempted to
prevent a foreseeable
failure; acted to remove the
cause of a failure once it
had occurred, and corrected
the failure promptly once
the cause of the failure had
been removed.
-
Correction of a failure is
ordinarily considered prompt if
made within 30 days after:
-
The cause of the failure is
removed,
-
The failure is discovered,
or
-
The filer's last regular
submission for corrections
is made (a submission is
considered "regular" only if
made at intervals of 30 days
or less).
20.1.7.9.2.1 (09-30-2002)
Missing TINs
-
In
general, if the filer failed
to include a TIN because the
payee failed to provide the
TIN, the filer will have acted
in a
responsible manner
only by making the required
solicitations.
-
The term "solicitation" means
a request to the payee to
provide a TIN.
-
The TIN will be treated as
missing if it
-
Does not contain nine
digits, or
-
Includes a mixture of
digits and letters.
20.1.7.9.2.2 (09-30-2002)
Solicitations– Missing TINs
-
In
general, an initial
solicitation and two annual
solicitations are required for
missing TINs.
-
An
initial solicitation
must be made at the time the
account is opened. The term
account includes accounts,
relationships, and other
transactions. This requirement
is considered met if the TIN
is requested either orally or
in writing. The request can be
made by mail, telephone or
other electronic means.
-
If
after the initial
solicitation, the filer did
not receive the TIN:
-
A
first annual
solicitation
must be made by December
31 of the year the account
was opened (or the year
the transaction occurred),
if before December, or
-
By January 31st of the
following year (for
accounts opened or
transaction which occurred
in the preceding
December).
-
If
after the first annual
solicitation, a TIN was not
received:
-
A
second annual
solicitation
must be made by December
31 of the first year
following the calendar
year in which the account
was opened or transaction
occurred.
-
The initial and the first
annual solicitations
relate to the year the
account was opened or the
transaction occurred.
-
The second annual
solicitation relates to
the year following the
year the account was
opened or transaction
occurred.
-
Forms 1098 require an annual
solicitation to the payee
until a TIN is obtained.
-
Once the payee's TIN is
received, the filer must
include the TIN on all
information returns filed in
the future.
20.1.7.9.2.3 (09-30-2002)
Incorrect TINs
-
In
general, if the filer has been
notified by the Service or a
broker of an incorrect TIN,
they will have acted in a
responsible manner
only by making the required
annual solicitations.
-
The TIN will be treated as
incorrect if the name/TIN
combination does not match or
cannot be found on the Service
or SSA records.
-
Not currently issued TINs and
Name/TIN mismatch accounts are
considered to be incorrect for
purposes of solicitations and
penalty assessments under IRC
section 6724.
20.1.7.9.2.4 (09-30-2002)
Solicitations – Incorrect
TINs
-
In
general, the filer is required
to make an initial
solicitation and no more than
two annual solicitations for
incorrect TINs.
-
An
initial solicitation
must be made at the time the
account is opened or
transaction occurs. This
requirement is considered met
if the TIN is requested either
orally or in writing. The
request can be made by mail,
telephone or other electronic
means.
-
If
the filer is notified by the
Service or broker that the TIN
is incorrect:
-
A
first annual
solicitation
must be made by December
31 of the calendar year in
which the filer has been
notified, or
-
January 31 of the
following year if notified
in December.
-
The mailing of the "B"
Notice under IRC section
3406(a)(1)(B) satisfies
this requirement. See IRM
20.1.7.9.2.2.
-
If
the filer is notified by the
Service or broker in any
calendar year, following the
first notification that the
TIN is incorrect:
-
A
second annual
solicitation
must be made by December
31 of the calendar year
following the calendar
year in which the filer
was notified, or
-
January 31 of the
following year if notified
in December.
-
The mailing of the "B"
Notice under IRC section
3406(a)(1)(B) satisfies
this requirement.
Note:
Filers are not required
to show that they backup
withheld on payee
accounts to satisfy the
requirement for waiver
of the penalty under IRC
section 6724.
If
a filer has been notified of
an incorrect name/TIN
combination under IRC section
3406(a)(1)(B), the filer
generally must notify the
payee that the payee's account
contains an incorrect TIN
within 15 business days after
the date of the notice from
the Service or a broker.
-
Forms 1098 require an annual
solicitation to the payee
until a TIN is obtained.
-
If
a corrected TIN (or name) is
received, the filer must
include it on all information
returns filed in the future.
20.1.7.9.2.5 (09-30-2002)
Annual Solicitations
-
An
annual solicitation by mail
must include:
-
A letter stating that the
payee must provide its TIN
or the payee will be
subject to a $50 penalty
imposed by the Service,
-
A Form W–9 or acceptable
substitute form on which
the payee may provide
their TIN, and
-
A return envelope.
-
An
annual solicitation made by
telephone must:
-
Be made in a manner that
will encourage the payee
to provide their TIN,
-
Be a completed call to
each person with a missing
TIN and include a
conversation with an adult
member of the household or
to an officer of the
business or the
organization,
-
Include a request for the
TIN of the payee, and
-
Inform the payee that if
the payee fails to furnish
their TIN, the payee is
subject to a $50 penalty.
-
The filer must maintain
concurrent records showing the
solicitations were properly
made, and provide concurrent
records to the Service upon
request.
-
For solicitations required
under IRC section
3406(a)(1)(B), see IRM
120.1.7.10.1.
20.1.7.9.2.6 (09-30-2002)
Exceptions and Limitations
-
When an information reporting
provision specifically
provides the time and manner
for obtaining a TIN, the
solicitation requirements in
IRM 20.1.7.9.2 will not apply.
To act in a responsible
manner, the filer should
comply with the time and
manner requirements for
requesting the TIN under the
applicable IRC section. For
Example:
-
For Forms 1099–S, the
filer is only required to
make an initial
solicitation on or before
the related real estate
closing date.
-
For Forms 1098, the filer
is required to do an
annual solicitation until
the TIN is received.
-
The penalty waiver provisions
apply when:
-
The solicitation
requirements under Treas.
Regs. 301.6724–1(e) or
(f), or
-
Treas. Regs. 31.3406(d)–5
are met.
-
Annual solicitation is not
required for a year if:
-
Payments were not made, or
-
A return was not required
to be filed.
-
If
an account is closed in the
same year in which a penalty
notice is received for the
account, the filer must do the
solicitation if a payment is
required to made or if the
filer is otherwise required to
file a return that year.
-
To
avoid making more than the
required annual solicitations,
filers should follow the
provisions of Treas. Regs.
3406(a)(1)(B) and Reg.
31.3406(d)-5 for accounts
subject to backup withholding
mailing, rather than the
mailing requirements for
Treas. Regs. 301.6724–1(e) and
(f). This would apply to Forms
1099–B, INT, DIV, OID, MISC,
and PATR.
-
If
a filer
fails to make one or more
of the required solicitations,
the filer may satisfy the
solicitation requirement by:
-
Making two consecutive
annual solicitations in
subsequent years, and
-
After receiving the TIN,
including it on any
information return filed
in the future.
-
The penalty will apply to:
-
The years the solicitation
was not made, and
-
Subsequent years until the
filer has completed the
make-up solicitations.
-
Financial
institutions
are not required to make
annual solicitation by mail on
accounts with:
-
Stop-mail, or
-
Hold-mail instructions,
-
As long as they deliver
the solicitation in the
same manner as they
deliver the mail.
-
In cases of window
transactions, (one time
transactions) as in the
issuance of savings bonds.
-
A
filer
is not required to make
annual solicitations by mail
on accounts where:
-
Previous solicitations
have been returned as
undeliverable,
-
Other mailings have been
returned as undeliverable,
and
-
No new address has been
provided to the filer.
-
In
general, no more than two
annual solicitations are
required to establish that the
filer acted in a responsible
manner.
20.1.7.9.2.7 (08-20-1998)
Due Diligence Safe Harbor
-
For information returns,
filers may establish
reasonable cause by satisfying
the requirements for due
diligence 6676(b) under the
Interest and Dividend Tax
Compliance Act of 1983.
20.1.7.9.2.8 (08-20-1998)
TINs Special Rules
-
For information returns which
contained a missing or
incorrect TIN consider
reasonable cause criteria
satisfied if at the time the
account was opened the filer:
-
Exercised due diligence,
or
-
fulfilled the requirements
of Treas. Q/A-56 of
section 35a.9999–1 (which
describes the solicitation
requirements under IRC
section 6676(d) prior to
its repeal by OBRA 89),
and
-
The TIN was requested as
follows (1) according to
the time and manner of the
information provision
under which the
information return is
filed, or if none then,
(2) under IRC section
6109, Identifying Numbers,
or (3) in a manner that
would otherwise have
satisfied reasonable cause
criteria under IRC section
6676(a).
20.1.7.9.2.9 (08-20-1998)
Special Abatement Conditions
-
Bankruptcy. An unreversed TC
520 and a Freeze code — V are
used to identify a payer/filer
that is in bankruptcy status.
These codes will be present on
the MFTRA transcripts.
-
If the unreversed TC 520
has a transaction date of
October 22, 1994 or
earlier, the assessment is
generally prohibited by
the Bankruptcy Reform Act
of 1994 (The bankruptcy
law supersedes the
Internal Revenue Code).
-
If there is a TC 520 and a
— V freeze on the account:
(1) Check directly with
the Insolvency Supporting
the Area. Insolvency
Support will advise how to
proceed. (2) The TC 520
and — V freeze must be
present before a penalty
abatement can be
considered. However, the
penalty should not be
abated solely because the
response states there is a
bankruptcy.
-
If there is no TC 520 and
— V freeze on the account,
but the payer can provide
the necessary information,
notify the Area Insolvency
Support function. A
bankrupt payer will know
the bankruptcy petition
date, the court where the
petition was filed, and
the docket number
-
If a —Z freeze is on the
account, refer the module
to the Criminal
Investigation Division. Do
not assess the penalty.
-
Banks, Trusts
Companies, Savings and Loans.
Penalties and
collection of penalties
assessed against insolvent or
bankrupt banks, trust
companies, or savings and loan
associations may be prohibited
under IRC section 7507(a).
Insolvency includes:
-
The respondent is a bank,
trust company or savings
and loan association, and
-
Tthe organization is
bankrupt and/or protected
under IRC section 7507(a).
-
If
the reply to the penalty
proposal or penalty notice
indicates that:
-
A failed savings and loan
is under the receivership
of the Resolution Trust
Corporation (RTC), or
-
A failed bank is under the
receivership of the
Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC), refer
the case to the
Examination Classification
Specialist for your
service. The reply from
RTC/FDIC may be received
in response to either the
penalty proposal notice or
after the assessment is
made. (Also see (5)
below.)
-
If Exam decides that the
penalty should be waived,
they will refer the case
back to the penalty unit
to close out the case (or
proposal) or to abate the
penalty.
-
If the penalty will be
sustained, Exam will
return the case to the
penalty unit to input the
adjustment (or proposals)
and/or correspond with
RTC/FDIC. Exam will
provide language to
explain to RTC/FDIC why
the penalty is not being
abated.
-
Exam will notify the
penalty unit of their
decision to abate or not
abate within 10 working
days. If not, the penalty
unit will follow-up with
the designated
classification specialist.
-
If a penalty proposal
notice with RTC/FDIC shown
is the entity was referred
to Exam before being
mailed, the response from
Exam will indicate whether
or not the campus should
mail the proposal notice
or close the case with no
further action.
-
For imputed interest, see LEM
20.1.7.9.5.
-
For state agencies, see LEM
20.1.7.9.5.
-
If
the taxpayer's response
indicates that the information
returns reported liquidation
dividends (Form 1099–DIV),
abate or do not assess the
penalty or the applicable
portion that applies to the
liquidation distribution.
-
IRC section 404(k) dividend
distributions, reported on
Form 1099–DIV, are not subject
to penalties under IRC section
6721, 6722, or 6723. These
dividends are not true
dividend distributions
reportable under IRC section
6042, but are Employee Stock
Ownership Plan distributions
reportable under IRC section
6047, and therefore are
subject to penalties under IRC
section 6652(e). The Service
has allowed the filing
community to report ESOP
distributions on Form
1099–DIV.
-
For multiple payee documents
to an individual payee, see
LEM 20.1.7.9.2.9.
-
For magnetic media penalties
resulting from corporate
mergers , see LEM 20.1.79.2.9.
-
If
a filer is penalized for
returns not required to be
filed by law, the penalty must
be reduced by the number of
returns not required to be
filed. The filing requirements
for all returns are listed in
Exhibit 20.1.7–4.
-
These returns are being
dropped systematically for the
paper returns processed
through OCR and for magnetic
media filed returns. However,
for DIS input returns, the
returns must be counted
manually to determine how many
meet the penalty criteria,
therefore, it is possible for
some errors to occur by
counting returns that should
be deleted from the count
based on the dollar amount.
-
DIS returns can be
identified by the presence
of a campus code in the
first two positions of the
DLN.
-
If the filer states that
the returns were not
required to be filed by
law (based on the dollar
amount), examine the PMF
transcript for evidence of
the DIS input returns
before making a
determination.
-
If DIS input is verified,
abate the applicable
portion of the penalty.
For example, if the filer
submits 100 Forms 1099–INT
late and indicates in the
reply that 10 were not
required to be filed,
reduce the penalty by 10
times applicable penalty
amount.
-
If
all returns on the PMF
transcript were filed on
magnetic or electronic media
or OCR processed (first two
positions of the DLN are other
than the campus code), send
letter 1948C and advise the
filer that returns not
required to be filed were
deducted before we calculated
the penalty.
-
If
the filer claims that returns
are not required to be filed
by law for other reasons,
check Exhibit 20.1.7–4 for
exception. Additional
exceptions to the filing
requirements are shown in the
Instructions to filers of
Forms 1099, 1098, 5498, and
W-2G.
-
The penalty may be waived for
a limited number of incorrect
TINS if the TIN is incorrect
due to a clerical or
processing error and the
following conditions are met:
-
The filer must show that
he acted in a responsible
manner by requesting the
TIN from the payee,
-
An inadvertent processing
or clerical error occurred
in preparing the data,
which caused the wrong
name or TIN to be filed on
the information return.
-
Also see LEM 20.1.7.9.2.9
for unprocessable returns.
20.1.7.9.2.10 (08-20-1998)
Transitional Rules
-
For returns required to be
filed or payee statements
required to be furnished after
December 31, 1989, and on or
before April 22, 1991, (tax
year 1989 and 1990) consider
reasonable cause criteria
satisfied, if the filer would
have satisfied reasonable
cause under the applicable IRC
sections 6721, 6722, or 6723
and related regulations that
were required prior to OBRA
'89.
20.1.7.9.2.11 (08-20-1998)
Civil Penalties Statute of
Limitations
-
No
statute of Limitations applies
to unfiled returns. Penalties
may be assessed at any time.
See IRC section 6501 (c)(3).
-
For missing or incorrect
information on a filed
information return, the
penalties must be assessed
within 3 years after the due
date of the return or the date
filed, whichever is later. See
IRC section 6501 (a).
20.1.7.10 (09-30-2002)
Backup Withholding (BUWH) IRC
Section (3406(a)(1)(B))
-
Under IRC section 3406(a)(1)(B),
filers who receive a notification
from the Service that a TIN is
incorrect (or not currently
issued) are required to send a
backup withholding or "B" notice
to payees.
-
Notices CP 2100 or 2100A mailed to
filers serve as notification from
the Service of the requirement to
send a " B" notice. The date of
the CP 2100/2100A is considered
the date of the official "B"
notice.
-
Notices CP 2100 and 2100A also
contain payee records filed with
missing TINs. Filers are not
required to mail a " B" notice for
missing TINs. However, they should
use the listing to verify that
they are already backup
withholding on these accounts. The
filer should request the TIN from
the payee if it has not been
requested previously. Backup
withholding must continue until
the TIN is received.
-
This program applies only to Forms
1099 "B" , INT, DIV, OID, PATR and
MISC filed for tax year 1989 or
later. See Exhibit 20.1.7–5 for an
explanation of the TIN validity
process used to determine whether
a TIN is incorrect.
-
Notices are usually mailed to
filers in October of each year. A
"second pass" mailing is made in
the subsequent calendar year,
after late filed, previously
unpostable or unprocessable
returns have been processed. The
second mailing normally takes
place in March.
-
The actions that the filer and
payees must take upon notification
of an incorrect TIN is determined
by whether the notice is the first
or second notification of an
incorrect TIN for the same payee
received within three calendar
years. The CP 2100/2100A is
generic and any mailing could
include payee records for the
first or second notification. It
is the responsibility of the filer
to track the status of accounts.
-
When a filer receives a first
notification of an incorrect TIN:
-
The filer must send a copy of
the first " B" notice, a Form
W–9, Request for Taxpayer
Identification Number and
Certification, or an
acceptable substitute and an
optional reply envelope to the
payee within 15 business days
of the date of the notice or
the date the CP 2100/2100A is
received (whichever is later).
The outer envelope must be
clearly marked "Important Tax
Information Enclosed" or
"Important Tax Return Document
Enclosed."
-
Payees are required to respond
within 30 calendar days.
-
Filers who do not receive a
newly signed Form W–9 from the
payee within 30 calendar days
of the date of the " B" notice
must begin backup withholding.
- If
a filer receives a second
notification of an incorrect TIN
for the same payee within three
calendar years:
-
The filer must send a copy of
the second " B" notice and an
optional reply envelope to the
payee within 15 business days
of the date of the notice or
the date the CP 2100/2100A is
received (whichever is later).
The outer envelope must be
clearly marked "Important Tax
Information Enclosed" or
"Important Tax Return Document
Enclosed."
-
The payee must request
verification of its TIN from
SSA (for SSNs) or the Service
(for EINs).
-
Filers who do not receive
verification from SSA Form
7028, or Service Letter 147C
from the payee within 30
business days after the date
of the second notice must
begin backup withholding. The
filer also has the option of
beginning backup withholding
on reportable payments
immediately upon receipt of
the second notification.
Backup withholding must
continue until the requested
verification is received and
must be stopped within 30
calendar days after the
verification is received..
-
Filers must compare the listings
of incorrect and/or not currently
issued TINs received from the
Service with their records to
determine if the name/TIN
combination included on the
listings agrees or disagrees with
their records.
- In
general, if an account number is
provided on the listing, the filer
only needs to identify the
account(s) with that corresponding
number or designation that has the
same name/TIN combination. If no
account number is provided, the
filer must use reasonable care to
identify all accounts that relate
to the same incorrect name/TIN
combination.
- If
the name/TIN combination on the
listing agrees with their records,
the filer must send the
appropriate "B" notice.
- If
the name/TIN combination on the
listing disagrees with its
records, the filer must determine
whether:
-
The mismatch was due to an
error in their submission
(when filing the information
return). If so, the filer must
correct its records and
include the correct
information on any future
information returns they file.
A "B" notice is not required.
-
The information in their
records has changed since
filing the information return.
If so, the filer must include
that information on any future
information returns they file.
A "B" notice is not required,
or
-
The Service changed the
information during processing.
If so, the filer should notate
their records and take no
further action. A "B" notice
is not required.
-
When backup withholding is
required, filers must withhold 30
percent of the reportable payment.
-
Filers must remit backup
withholding using Form 8109, FTD
Deposit Coupon, in each
appropriate quarter and report
those amounts annually on Form
945, Annual Return of Withheld
Federal Income Tax. They must have
an Employer Identification Number
(EIN) to file both forms. An EIN
can be obtained by calling the
TELETIN number found on the back
of Form SS–4, Application for
Employer I.D. Number.
20.1.7.10.1 (09-30-2002)
Processing CP 2100/2100A
Notices
-
Campuses will
electronically receive tapes
which will create CP 2100/2100A
Notices followed by listings of
Forms 1099–B, –DIV, –INT, –MISC,
–OID, and –PATR filed with
missing, incorrect, and/or not
currently issued TINs.
NOTE—This program is not part of
the 972CG process.
-
The CP 2100A Notice will be
mailed to payers whose
listings total 50 or fewer
information returns.
-
The CP 2100 Notice will be
mailed to payers whose
listings total between 51
and 250 information returns.
-
MCC will mail the CP 2100
Notice with tape listings of
missing, incorrect, and/or
not currently issued TINs to
payers whose listings
include 251 or more
information returns.
-
Campuses must retain the tape
reels for 90 days after the date
of the notice. This will ensure
that they are available for
recreate requests from filers.
-
A separate tape will create a
control listing of the filers,
paper and tape, who will receive
a notice. This listing will
include the filer's TIN (EIN or
SSN), name, address, (street,
city, state and zip code),
account access key, sequential
number, and transmittal number,
and tape/paper indicator. Mail
labels will also be generated.
-
Headquarters will notify each
campus of the actual date that
the tape files will be
transmitted.
20.1.7.10.2 (09-30-2002)
Mailing CP2100/CP2100A Notices
-
Produce the CP 2100/2100A's and
the accompanying listing and
mail them to the filer.
-
Each campus should ensure that
they have the capability of
providing a duplicate notice and
listing.
-
A complete package from the
campus should contain:
-
The CP 2100/2100A Notice (2
copies), and
-
The listing of missing,
incorrect, or not currently
issued TINs.
-
A complete package from MCC
should contain:
-
The CP 2100 Notice (2
copies), and
-
The magnetic tape listing of
missing, incorrect or not
currently issued TINs, and
-
Publication 1281.
-
The notice and listing(s) should
be mailed in an E–178 envelope
as appropriate.
-
Ensure that a garbled data
review is performed.
-
Misrouted mail: If a filer
contacts the campus indicating
that they have erroneously
received a CP2100/2100A Notice
for another filer, apologize and
advise them to immediately
return the notice to a
designated contact person.
Note:
The campus should establish a
designated contact person to
expedite the return of
misrouted mail. When received,
mail the notice to the correct
filer and complete the
required local disclosure
procedures.
20.1.7.10.3 (09-30-2002)
Responses (CP2100/2100A
Notices)
-
The campus may receive
correspondence and/or
documentation concerning
CP2100/2100A Notices, even
though filers are not required
to respond back to the Service.
-
If the filer's response
indicates that they do not
understand why they received
a CP 2100/2100A Notice,
provide a brief explanation
and refer them to
Publication 1281,
Publication 1679, or to the
Information Reporting
Program (IRP) Centralized
Customer Service Sitein
Martinsburg, WV. (The
telephone number is
referenced in both
publications as well as on
the CP 2100/2100A.)
-
If the filer has submitted
original Forms W–8,
Certificate of Foreign
Status, Form W–9, Request
for Taxpayer Identification
Number and Certification, or
Form 4669, Employee Wage
Statement, return them to
the filer and advise the
filer that the forms should
be retained for their
records. If copies of these
forms are received from the
filer, they do not have to
be returned and, therefore,
may be destroyed.
-
If a filer submits examples
of garbled data, apologize
for the inconvenience and
advise that no action is
necessary. A " B" notice
should not be sent to the
payee.
-
Filers are not required to
file corrections for missing
or incorrect names and TINs.
Therefore, filers who
contact the Service
concerning the need to
submit a correction for a
missing or incorrect name or
TIN in response to a
CP2100/2100A notice should
be advised that they are not
required to submit
corrections.
-
Filers should be advised to
update their records and
reflect the correct
information on any returns
filed in the future. This
also applies if the filer
questions whether it's
necessary to submit name/TIN
corrections for other prior
year returns related or
unrelated to a CP 2100/2100A
notice.
-
However, filers who contact
the Service concerning the
need to submit corrections
for name/TIN errors for
returns filed for a
current processing year
return, may be
encouraged to submit a
correction if the contact is
made on or before August 1
of the filing year.
-
Filing the correction by
August 1 would reduce the
applicable information
return penalty if the filer
is not able to establish
reasonable cause to have the
penalty waived.
-
If the contact is made after
August 1, filers may be
encouraged to submit the
correction since this would
allow the Service to update
the payee's record during
the processing year, but,
the filer should be informed
that filing the correction
will not reduce the
applicable $50 penalty.
However, the penalty will be
waived if filer is able to
establish reasonable cause
for filing the return with
the missing or incorrect
TIN.
-
Filers are required to
continue to submit
corrections for
other types of errors
(other than names and TINs).
If the filer is required to
make a correction and there
is also a name/TIN error on
the same return, the filer
should be advised to correct
all information when
submitting the return. Route
corrected returns (current
or prior year) to the
Receipt and Control function
for processing according to
the guidelines in IRM
3(10)80.
-
Occasionally, a filer will
receive notification of
missing, incorrect, and not
currently issued TINs with a
CP2100/2100A Notice when
they have previously filed
corrections. Due to
processing cut-offs for the
BUWH program, some
corrections may not be taken
into consideration for the
first mailing of the
CP2100/2100A's. The filer is
not required to take any
action provided their
records have been updated.
-
There is no requirement to
backup withhold on exempt
recipients. Refer to the
Form W–9 instructions for
the exceptions to backup
withholding.
-
Backup withholding is not
required on nonresident
aliens provided the filer
has on file the proper
certified documentation
(i.e., Form W–8 series).
-
A partnership may obtain
credit for backup
withholding shown on Form
1099 by placing that amount
on Schedule K, line 13a of
the Form 1065, and then
carrying the amount through
to each partner on Schedule
K–1. Line 13a is then
claimed as a credit on the
individual Form 1040.
-
Filers are not required to
wait 30 business days
following receipt of the CP
2100/2100A Notice to begin
backup withholding; they may
elect to impose backup
withholding at any time
after receipt of the CP
2100/2100A Notice.
-
If a payee requests a copy
of Form SSA–7028, inform
them that the document is an
SSA form and that SSA will
mail it directly to the
filer after the required
research has been completed.
If SSA makes a change
because of the information
submitted to them by the
payee on Form SS–5,
Application for a Social
Security Number Card
(Original, Replacement or
Correction), a new Social
Security Card will be mailed
to the payee.
-
If Form 941C, Statement to
Correct Information
Previously Reported on
Employers Tax Return, is
received from a filer who
has an EIN, Form 941 filing
requirements, and a
previously filed Form 941
for the quarter specified,
the form should be routed to
BMF adjustments for
resolution.
20.1.7.10.4 (09-30-2002)
Undeliverable Notice
-
Research for a different address
using IDRS. If one is found,
remail the notice.
-
Do not change the original date
on the undeliverable notice.
Filers will have 15 business
days from the date of receipt to
complete all "B" notice
mailings.
-
If no other address is found,
file the undeliverable notice,
listing, and original envelope
with the printed file copy and
destroy 90 days after the notice
date.
20.1.7.10.5 (09-30-2002)
Recreating Notices
-
Filers may contact either a
campus or the IRP Centralized
Customer Service Site to request
recreates (copies) of CP
2100/2100A Notices. These
requests may be received at any
time after the initial mailing
of each notice.
-
The retention period for CP
2100/2100A Notices is four years
from the original notice date.
However, the procedures for
filing requests for recreated
notices differ for paper notices
and tape notices, and are based
on when a request is received.
-
For paper notices:
-
Campus are
required to retain the tapes
used to create CP 2100/2100A
Notices for at least 90 days
from the notice date. If a
campus uses the method
described in section 2a
below, the printed file copy
must also be retained for
the 90-day period.
Note
— this program is not part
of the 972CG process.
-
Campus will
fill all requests received
for paper listings of
missing and/or incorrect
TINs within the 90 day
period by: Retaining a
printed file copy of the CP
2100/2100A Notice(s) and
listing(s) mailed.
Photocopying the file copy
and mailing it to the filer,
or Printing a CP 2100/2100A
Notice and the accompanying
listing(s) from the tapes
using the " Control D"
Method (restore or load the
file, go into Control D, and
use the find command to
locate the TIN). Mail the
recreate to the filer.
NOTE
— This program is not part
of the 972CG process.
-
After the 90-day period,
Headquarters Office,
Information Technology (IT)
will fill recreate requests.
Requests received by campus
must be routed through the
IRP Centralized Customer
Service Siteto Headquarters
Office IS. A contact sheet
will be used for this
purpose.
-
For tape notices:
-
The IRP Centralized Customer
Service Site will fill all
requests received for tape
listings of missing and/or
incorrect TINs within the
four-year retention period
(i.e., 4 years from the
original CP 2100/2100A
Notice date).
-
Requests for tape recreates
received by campus must be
routed, through the
Management Support Branch
analyst, to the IRP
Centralized Customer Service
Site.
Exhibit 20.1.7-1 (08-20-1998)
500 Series Reference Numbers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference numbers 500 through
514 are used for penalties
assessed after December 31,
1989. These reference numbers
are also used for penalty
proposal notices (beginning
with tax year 1992).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Reference numbers 500—514:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) will be used for tax years
1989 and subsequent by the IRP
Program and apply to penalties
assessed under IRC section
6721. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) an explanation for each
reference number is also
contained on Notice 925.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Reference numbers 52X—53X are
reserved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference |
Description |
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
Late Filing Penalty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
penalty is charged for each
Form 1098, 1099, W–2G, or W–2
that was not correctly and
timely filed. IRC section 6721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501 |
Magnetic Media Penalty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
penalty is charged for each
Form 1098, 1099, W–2G, or W–2
(over 250 forms of each type)
not filed either
electronically or by magnetic
media as required by IRC
section 6011(e)(2)(A). IRC
section 6721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
502 |
Missing or Incorrect TIN
Penalty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
penalty is charged for each
Form 1098, 1099, W–2G, or W–2
submitted with missing or
incorrect TINs. IRC section
6721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503 |
Improper Format Penalty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
penalty is charged for each
Form 1098, 1099, W–2G, or W–2
submitted in an improper
format as provided for in
either the IRC, Treas. Regs,
or SSA procedures. IRC section
6721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504 |
Late and Magnetic Media
Penalty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
penalty is charged for each
Form 1098, 1099, W–2G, or W–2
that was not filed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
♦ correctly and timely, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
♦ either electronically or by
magnetic media. (over 250
forms) IRC section 6721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505 |
Late and Missing or Incorrect
TIN Penalty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
penalty is charged for each
Form 1098, 1099, W–2G, or W–2
that was: |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ not correctly and timely
filed, and |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ submitted with a missing or
incorrect TIN. IRC section
6721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
506 |
Late and Improper Format
Penalty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
penalty is charged for each
Form 1098, 1099, W–2G, or W–2
that was not: |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ correctly and timely filed,
and |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ submitted in the proper
format as provided for in
either the IRC, Treas. Regs.,
or SSA procedures. IRC section
6721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507 |
Magnetic Media and Missing or
Incorrect TIN Penalty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
penalty is charged for each
Form 1098, 1099, W–2G, or W–2
that was: |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ not filed either
electronically or by magnetic
media, (over 250 forms) and
|
|
|
|
|
|
♦ filed with missing or
incorrect TINs. IRC section
6721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508 |
Magnetic Media and Improper
Format Penalty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
penalty is charged for each
Form 1098, 1099, W–2G, or W–2
that was not: |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ filed either electronically
or by magnetic media (over 250
forms of each type) and
|
|
|
|
|
|
♦ submitted in the proper
format as provided for in
either the IRC, Treas. Regs.,
or SSA procedures. IRC section
6721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509 |
Missing or Incorrect TIN and
Improper Format Penalty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
penalty is charged for each
Form 1098, 1099, W–2G, or W–2
that was filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ with a missing or incorrect
TIN, and |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ in an improper format as
provided for in either the
IRC, Treas. Regs., or SSA
procedures. IRC section 6721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
510 |
Late, Magnetic Media, and
Missing or Incorrect TIN
Penalty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
penalty is charged for each
Form 1098, 1099, W–2G, or W–2
that was: |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ not correctly and timely
filed, |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ not filed either
electronically or by magnetic
media (over 250 forms of each
type) as required by IRC
section 6011(e)(2)(A), and
|
|
|
|
|
|
♦ filed with missing or
incorrect TINs. IRC section
6721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511 |
Late, Magnetic Media, and
Improper Format Penalty |
|
|
|
|
|
A
penalty is charged for each
Form 1098, 1099, W–2G, or W–2
that was not: |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ correctly and timely filed,
|
|
|
|
|
|
♦ filed either electronically
or by magnetic media (after
the first 250 forms of each
type) required by IRC section
6011(e)(2)(A), and
|
|
|
|
|
|
♦ submitted in the proper
format as provided for in
either the IRC, Treas. Regs.,
or SSA procedures. IRC section
6721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512 |
Late, Missing or Incorrect
TIN, and Improper Format
Penalty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
penalty is charged for each
Form 1098, 1099, W–2G, or W–2
that was: |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ not correctly and timely
filed, |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ filed with missing or
incorrect TINs, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
♦ not submitted in the proper
format as provided for in
either the IRC, Treas. Regs.,
or SSA procedures. IRC section
6721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
513 |
Magnetic Media, Missing or
Incorrect TIN, and Improper
Format Penalty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
penalty is charged for each
Form 1098, 1099, W–2G, or W–2
that was: |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ not filed either
electronically or using
magnetic media (over 250 forms
of each type), |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ filed with missing or
incorrect TINs, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
♦ not submitted in the proper
format as provided for in
either the IRC, Treas. Regs.,
or SSA procedures. IRC section
6721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514 |
Late, Magnetic Media, Missing
or Incorrect TIN, and Improper
Format Penalty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
penalty is charged for each
Form 1098, 1099, W–2G, or W–2
that was: |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ not correctly and timely
filed, |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ not filed either
electronically or using
magnetic media (over 250 forms
of each type), |
|
|
|
|
|
♦ filed with missing or
incorrect TINs, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
♦ not submitted in the proper
format as provided for in
either the IRC, Treas. Regs.,
or SSA procedures. IRC section
6721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAWR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
549 |
Failure to File Form W–2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
♦ A penalty is charged for
each Form W–2 that was not
filed as required by IRC
section 6051. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550 |
Late Filing Penalty Form W–2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
♦ A penalty is charged for
each Form W–2 that was filed
after the due date as required
by IRC section 6051.
|
Exhibit 20.1.7-2 (08-20-1998)
600 Series Reference Numbers
|
(1) |
Three digit reference numbers
in the 600 series are
assessed/abated on MFT 13 or
55 and are the result of an
action taken by a compliance
function with access to the
taxpayer's records.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Reconsideration criteria
should be applied to requests
for abatement of a 600 series
penalty reference number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
The following 600 series
reference codes are used for
1989 and subsequent tax years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference |
Description |
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
IRC section 6721 |
|
|
|
Failure to File an Information
Return |
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
A
penalty is charged for each
information return that was
not: |
|
|
|
♦ filed timely, |
|
|
|
♦ filed accurately showing
correct and complete
information, or |
|
|
|
♦ filed in the correct format
(i.e. paper, mag-media or
other machine readable form).
|
|
|
|
|
|
651 |
|
Failure to file
Form
8300 reporting cash
transactions greater than
$10,000. |
|
|
|
|
|
652 |
|
Intentional Disregard of the
requirement to file
Form
8300 reporting cash
transactions greater than
$10,000. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRC section 6722 |
|
|
|
Failure to Provide a Payee
Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
612 |
|
A
penalty is charged for each
payee statement that:
|
|
|
|
♦ was not furnished on or
before the due date to the
person to whom the statement
is due; |
|
|
|
♦ did not provide all the
required information, or,
|
|
|
|
♦ did not furnish correct
information. |
|
|
|
|
|
653 |
|
Failure to provide a written
statement to each person named
on the
Form 8300.
|
|
|
|
|
|
654 |
|
Intentional Disregard of the
requirement to provide a
written statement to each
person named on the
Form
8300. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRC section 6723 |
|
|
|
Failure to Comply With Other
Information Reporting
Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
621 |
|
A
penalty is charged for the
failure to comply with "Other
Information Reporting
Requirements"
IRC Code Section 6722
|
|
|
|
|
|
674 |
|
IRC section 6723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Failure to provide a notice of
exchange of partnership
interest (6050K(c)(1)).
|
Exhibit 20.1.7-3 (08-20-1998)
PMF Civil Penalty Transcript
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Entity Information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Linked—Indicated a match
between the IMF/BMF entities
and the PMF entities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
Filing History: |
|
|
a.
|
Indicates if Information
Returns were filed in the tax
year. |
|
|
b.
|
Penalty indicator codes
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Submission Record:
|
|
|
a.
|
Original transmitted—Paper or
magnetic media. |
|
|
b.
|
Amended transmitted—Paper or
magnetic media. |
|
|
c.
|
Replace transmitted magnetic
media only. |
|
|
d.
|
Number of documents subject to
a penalty. |
|
|
e.
|
Received date for late filing.
|
|
|
f.
|
DLN of the Form 1096, MSN of
Form W–3. |
|
|
g.
|
Total money amount and
withholding reported on forms
filed. |
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
Summary: |
|
|
a.
|
Total original, amended,
replace documents submitted.
|
|
|
b.
|
Number of documents subject to
penalty. |
|
|
c.
|
Total amount reported.
|
|
|
d.
|
Backup withholding.
|
|
|
e.
|
Waiver and extensions granted.
|
|
|
f.
|
Summary of penalties by return
type. |
|
|
g.
|
Dollar amount of penalty
assessed. |
Exhibit 20.1.7-4 (08-20-1998)
Information Return Filing
Requirements
Exhibit 20.1.7-5 (08-20-1998)
TIN Validation
|
|
|
|
The TIN Validation process
compares the taxpayer
identification number (TIN)
and name control (the first
four characters of a surname
or first four characters of
the first significant word in
a non-individual's title)
against certain IRS or Social
Security Administration (SSA)
files. |
|
|
|
|
|
• The NAP–1 file, a number
bank which contains all social
security numbers (SSNs) ever
issued and all of the name
controls ever associated with
those SSNs. |
|
|
|
|
|
• The weekly accretion file, a
weekly update to the NAP–1
received by SSA. |
|
|
|
|
|
• The EIN/Name Control file, a
file created and maintained by
the Service which contains all
employer identification
numbers (EINs) and the name
controls associated with them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The matching process:
|
|
|
|
|
|
• The Service attempts to
match each name and TIN
combination provided on all
information returns against
the three files listed above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
• The first attempt is made
against the NAP–1 file. If no
match is found, an attempt is
made against the EIN/Name
Control file. |
|
|
|
|
|
• If the TIN matches, an
attempt to match the name
control provided is made.
|
|
|
|
|
|
• If the name control is not
provided, an attempt to
develop name controls is made
by creating name controls from
each word separated by space
on each name line. Both name
lines 1 and 2 are read,
totaling 80 characters, 40
characters for each name line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
• Extract matches are
attempted first, followed by
proximal matches. |
|
|
|
|
Extract matches occur when
the name/TIN combination
provided on the information
return exactly matches the
name/TIN combination on either
file. This applies to both
SSNs and EINs. |
|
|
|
|
Proximal matches allow for
transposition of the second
and third characters of the
name control provided. NOTE:
THIS APPLIES TO SSNs ONLY.
|
20.1.8.1 (07-05-2000)
Introduction
-
This Section covers the
penalty provisions of
the Internal Revenue
Code (IRC) that apply to
Employee Plans (EP) and
Exempt Organizations (EO).
-
Decisions on penalty
issues are to be guided
by the applicable
statutes, regulations,
and procedural
instructions issued by
the Service. All
employees should keep in
mind the objectives in
this handbook and the
Penalty Policy Statement
P–1–18 when handling
each penalty case.
-
Other civil penalties
that are common to EP/EO
returns are discussed in
the following Sections
of IRM 20.1:
-
Failure to File and
Failure to Pay, IRM
20.1.2
-
Estimated Tax
Penalty, IRM 20.1.3
-
Failure to Deposit,
IRM 20.1.4
-
Return Related
Penalties, IRM
20.1.5
-
Return Preparer
Penalties, IRM
20.1.6
-
Information Return
Penalties, IRM
20.1.7.
20.1.8.1.1
(07-05-2000)
Failure to File and
Failure to Pay
-
When a delinquent
income or excise tax
return is received
from an entity during
an examination, the
EP/EO employee will
determine whether the
failure to file and/or
failure to pay
penalties under IRC
section 6651(a)(1) and
(2) should be
asserted. See IRM
20.1.2, Failure to
File/Failure to Pay.
The excise tax returns
required to be filed
in connection with
employee plans and
exempt organizations
are:
-
Form 5330, Return
of Initial Excise
Taxes Related to
Employee Benefit
Plans
-
Form 4720, Return
of Certain Excise
Taxes on Charities
and Other Persons
Under Chapter 41
and 42 of the IRC.
-
The income tax returns
required of certain
exempt organizations
and trusts are:
-
Form 990C,
Farmer's
Cooperative
Association Income
Tax Return
-
Form 990PF, Return
of Private
Foundation or
Section 4947(a)(1)
Trust Treated as a
Private Foundation
-
Form 990T, Exempt
Organization
Business Income
Tax Return
-
Form 1041, U.S.
Income Tax Return
for Estates and
Trusts
-
Form 1120POL, U.S.
Income Tax Return
for Certain
Political
Organizations.
-
If any portion of the
tax is subject to a
penalty under IRC
section 6663, Fraud,
that same portion of
tax cannot be subject
to a penalty under IRC
section 6651, Failure
to File Tax Return or
Pay Tax. See IRM 20.1
5.
20.1.8.1.2
(07-05-2000)
IRC section
6662(f)—Accuracy-Related
Penalty—Substantial
Understatement of
Pension Liabilities
-
IRC section 6662(a)
imposes a penalty on a
taxpayer equal to 20
percent of any income
tax underpayment
attributable to
deductions for
employer contributions
to a defined benefit
plan or retirement
annuity plan where
such deductions are
based on a substantial
overstatement of
liabilities under the
plan.
20.1.8.1.2.1
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Assertion
-
In general, there is
an overstatement of
pension liabilities
if the actuarial
determination of
pension liabilities
taken into account
for deduction
purposes, under IRC
section 404(a)(1) or
(2), exceeds the
amount determined to
be the correct
amount of such
liability. Examples
of when an
overstatement of
pension liabilities
may occur:
-
When the
valuation of
such liabilities
is based on
unreasonable
actuarial
assumptions or
methods that
accelerate
deductions
either in a
manner that is
inconsistent
with the
regulations
under IRC
section 412,
relating to
acceptable
funding methods,
or by taking
into account
benefits in
excess of those
permitted under
IRC section 415.
-
When the Service
has determined
that deductions
are to be
disallowed
because
liabilities are
overstated for
other reasons
based on the
facts and
circumstances.
-
A substantial
overstatement occurs
when the actuarial
determination of the
liabilities taken
into account for
purposes of
computing the
deduction under IRC
section 404(a)(1) or
(2) is 200 percent
or more of the
amount determined to
be the correct
amount.
-
Due Date.
This is an accuracy
related penalty, and
as such there is no
due date.
-
Penalty
Computation.
The penalty under
IRC section 6662(a)
is computed by
multiplying the
underpayment of tax
attributable to the
substantial
overstatement of
pension liabilities
by 200 percent. No
penalty is imposed
unless the portion
of the underpayment
for the taxable year
attributable to the
substantial
overstatement of
pension liabilities
exceeds $1,000.
-
The penalty under
IRC section 6662(a)
by reason of any
substantial
overstatement of
pension liabilities
is identified by the
EP specialist.
20.1.8.1.2.2
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Relief
-
IRC section 6664(c)
provides for
non-assertion of the
penalty with respect
to any portion of
the underpayment if
it is shown that
there was a
reasonable cause for
such portion and the
taxpayer acted in
good faith with
respect to such
portion.
-
See IRM 20.1.1.3 for
a discussion of
penalty relief.
20.1.8.1.3
(07-05-2000)
How to Assess and
Abate—EP Procedures
-
Penalties on Employee
Benefit Plan forms are
assessed on Non-Master
File.
20.1.8.1.3.1
(07-05-2000)
TE/GE Processing
Procedures
-
Penalties under this
Chapter (except for
the IRC section 6684
penalty) may be
assessed without
issuing a statutory
notice of deficiency
that is required for
Chapter 41, 42 or 43
tax.
-
Generally, the
statute of
limitations for
assessment of these
penalties will be
the same as the
statute for the
return or statement
to which the
penalties relate.
Some penalties such
as the IRC section
6710 penalty do not
relate to a return.
These penalties
should be assessed
as soon as possible
even though it
appears they do not
have a statute of
limitations.
-
Taxpayers who
disagree with the
assertion of a
penalty are entitled
to a post-assessment
appeal under the
provisions of Regs.
601.106(a)(1)(iv).
The EP/EO specialist
should advise the
taxpayer of this
right and explain
the appeal may be
filed prior to
payment. For
additional
information on
appealing penalties,
see IRM 20.1.4.
-
Penalties should not
be assessed if the
total amount of tax
and penalty is less
than the amount
specified in Part 4
of the LEM.
-
If a penalty is to
be assessed using
Non-Master File
(NMF) procedures
against a person
(manager) or an
organization (such
as in an IRC section
6710 case) the EP/EO
specialist will:
-
Complete all
blocks (except
for the Document
Locator Number
(DLN) and the
computation of
interest) on the
Form 5734
(Non-Master File
Assessment
Voucher). The
Abstract Number
can be found in
the ADP and IDRS
Information Book
(Document 6209).
-
Prepare a
penalty case
file to transmit
Form 5734.
Attach Form 3198
(Special
Handling Notice)
to the outside
of the folder
and annotate
"Civil Penalty
Assessment" .
Include in the
file any source
documents
providing the
basis for the
penalty
assessment. Then
forward the file
to TE/GE-Special
Procedures
function
(TE/GE-Special
Processing
Function) with
instructions to
assess the
penalties
immediately.
-
If multiple
penalties are
being assessed,
separate penalty
files are
required. If the
penalty file is
related to an
unagreed issue
and the
specialist
separates the
file, the Form
3198 should
state the fact
of and reason
for the
separation.
-
If the case involves
a NMF account (which
is possible in an
IRC section 6684
case) which is open
on AIMS, the EP/EO
specialist will
provide the penalty
information to
TE/GE-Special
Processing Function
for preparation of
Form 2859 (Request
for Quick
Assessment). Enter
the penalty amount
in Item 35 of Form
5599, EO Examined
Closing Record.
-
If the penalty is to
be assessed through
the Business-Master
File (BMF), the
EP/EO specialist
will process the
case as follows:
-
Complete Form
5599.
-
If a subsequent
year delinquent
return is
secured and a
failure to file
penalty applies,
prepare Form
3198 (Special
Handling Notice)
to request the
assessment.
-
Forward Form
3198 along with
the delinquency
return package
to the TE/GE-SP.
Include in Item
34 of Form 5599
the amount of
the penalty.
20.1.8.1.3.2
(07-05-2000)
Service Center
Procedures
(Reserved)
-
This subsection is
reserved.
20.1.8.1.4
(07-05-2000)
Section Outline
-
The following
penalties are
discussed in IRM
20.1.8.2, Exempt
Organizations and
Certain Trusts:
-
IRC section
6652(c)
-
IRC section 6684
-
IRC section 6685
-
IRC section 6710
-
IRC section 6711
-
IRC section 6714.
-
The following
penalties are
discussed in IRM
20.1.8.3, Employee
Plans:
-
IRC section
6652(d)
-
IRC section
6652(e)
-
IRC section
6652(h)
-
IRC section
6652(i)
-
IRC section 6690
-
IRC section 6692
-
IRC section 6693
-
IRC section 6704
20.1.8.2 (07-05-2000)
Exempt Organizations
and Certain Trusts
-
Organizations which are
exempt from federal
income tax are organized
and operated for one or
more of the purposes
designated in IRC
section 501. Examples
include the following
types of organizations:
-
charitable
-
religious
-
scientific
-
educational
-
political
-
social
-
business
-
Exempt Organizations
under IRC sections 6033
and 6043(b) are required
to file:
-
Form 990, Return of
Organization Exempt
from Income Tax
-
Form 990BL,
Information and
Initial Excise Tax
Return for Black
Lung Benefit Trusts
& Certain Related
Person
-
Form 990PF, Return
of Private
Foundation or IRC
section 4947(a)(1)
Trust Treated as a
Private Foundation.
-
Certain Trusts under IRC
section 6034 are
required to file Form
1041A, U.S. Information
Return Trust
Accumulation of
Charitable Amounts.
20.1.8.2.1
(07-05-2000)
Failure to File
Certain Information
Returns—IRC section
6652(c)(2)
-
IRC section 6652(c)
was added by Public
law 91-172 and became
effective for taxable
years beginning after
December 31, 1969.
-
Public Law 104-168
amended IRC section
6652(c) for tax years
ending on or after
July 30, 1996.
20.1.8.2.1.1
(07-05-2000)
Returns by Exempt
Organizations—IRC
section 6652(c)(1)
-
IRC section
6652(c)(1)(A) —
Penalty Imposed on
the Organization.
-
IRC section 6033
and 6043(b)
require exempt
organizations to
file returns,
and IRC section
6034 requires
certain trusts
to file returns
on the date and
in the manner
prescribed. IRC
section
6652(c)(1) and
(2) impose a
penalty on
organizations
failing to meet
the requirements
of IRC section
6033, 6034 and
6043(b).
-
IRC section
6652(c)(1)(A)
imposes a
penalty on
exempt
organizations
required to file
returns under
IRC section 6033
of $20 for each
day, for tax
years ending on
or after July
30, 1996, during
which a failure
to file
continues
(determined with
regard to
extensions) or
for a failure to
include any of
the information
required to be
shown on a
return filed
under IRC
section 6033 or
to show the
correct
information. The
penalty is not
to exceed
$10,000 (for tax
years ending on
or after July
30, 1996) or 5
percent of the
gross receipts
of the
organization for
the year,
whichever is
less. (For tax
years ending
prior to July
30, 1996, the
penalty rate is
$10 per day with
a maximum of
$5,000 or 5
percent of gross
receipts.)
-
IRC section
6652(c)(1)(A)
imposes a
penalty on an
organization
having gross
receipts
exceeding
$1,000,000 for
any year, with
respect to the
return required
under IRC
section 6033 for
such year, of
$100 per day
with the maximum
penalty of
$50,000 per
return. This
applies to tax
years ending on
or after July
30, 1996.
-
IRC section
6652(c)(1)(B) —
Penalty Imposed on
the Manager or
Person Failing to
Comply.
-
IRC section
6652(c)(1)(B)
requires
organization
manager(s) to
file returns
required under
IRC section 6033
after the
Secretary has
made demand for
filing under
that provision.
-
A penalty of $10
is charged for
each day after
the expiration
of the time
specified in the
written demand
during which
such failure
continues.
-
The maximum
penalty imposed
under this
section on all
persons for
failure to file
any one return
is limited to
$5,000.
-
IRC section
6652(c)(1)(C) & (D)
— Public Disclosure
Requirements of Tax
Exempt Organizations
-
IRC section
6104(d), as
amended by
Public Law
105-277,
provides the
public
disclosure
requirements for
tax-exempt
organizations
described in IRC
section 501(c)
or (d) and
private
foundations. On
April 9, 1999,
the Service
issued
regulations
under IRC
section 6104(d)
(Regulations
301.6104(d)-3,
-4 and -5)
applicable to
tax-exempt
organizations,
other than
private
foundations. On
January 13,
2000, the
Service amended
these
regulations to
make them
applicable to
private
foundations. IRC
section 6104(d),
as amended,
became effective
for tax-exempt
organizations,
other than
private
foundations, on
June 8, 1999,
and for private
foundations on
March 13, 2000.
-
IRC section
6104(d)(3)
describes the
types of
information not
required to be
disclosed under
IRC section
6104(d).
-
In addition to
the requirement
that an
organization
make a copy of
the annual
return and
application for
recognition of
tax exempt
status available
for inspection,
an organization,
except as
provided in IRC
section
6104(d)(4), must
provide a copy
of its annual
return and
application, if
requested.
-
IRC section
6104(d)(4)
provides that
there are
limitations on
the requirement
to provide
copies of
returns or an
application to a
requester. An
organization is
not required to
fulfill a
request for a
copy if: (1) the
organization
makes its return
and application
widely available
as defined in
Regulation
301.6104(d)-4
or, (2) the
organization can
meet the
criteria
outlined in
Regulation
301.6104(d)-5
and establish
that the request
for copies is
part of a
harassment
campaign.
-
IRC section
6652(c)(1)(C)
imposes a
penalty of $20 a
day on the
person (as
defined in IRC
section
6652(c)(4)(C))
who fails to
either make the
return available
for inspection
or to provide a
copy of the
annual return.
The maximum
penalty on all
"persons" is
$10,000 with
respect to one
annual return.
-
IRC section
6652(c)(1)(D)
imposes a
penalty of $20 a
day on the
person (as
defined in IRC
section
6652(c)(4)(C))
who fails to
either make the
application
available for
inspection or to
provide a copy
of the
application. The
Code does not
set a maximum
limit on the
penalty.
-
IRC section
6652(c)(1)(D) —
Public Inspection of
Applications.
-
As noted above,
Public Law
105-277 made the
public
disclosure
requirements
applicable to
private
foundations
consistent with
the requirements
applicable to
other tax exempt
organizations.
The Service
issued
regulations
under IRC
section 6104(d),
applicable to
private
foundations.
However, for
private
foundation
returns due
before March 13,
2000, taking
into
consideration
any extension
for filing, the
public
inspection
requirements of
IRC section
6104(d) prior to
the amendment
apply to those
returns.
-
Prior to its
amendment, IRC
section 6104(d)
required that
foundation
managers make
the annual
return available
for inspection
within 180 days
after
publication of a
notice of its
availability.
-
Prior to asserting
penalties for
failure to allow
public inspection of
returns and
applications
required under IRC
section 6104, the
Service should
receive, in writing,
the name of the
person(s) who is
under a duty to
provide the return
or application as
well as the date of
the failure and a
description of the
facts of the
failure.
20.1.8.2.1.2
(07-05-2000)
Trusts and Exempt
Organizations—IRC
section 6652(c)
-
IRC section
6652(c)(2)(A) —
Penalty on the
Organization or
Trust.
-
IRC section
6652(c)(2)(A)
provides for a
daily
delinquency
penalty to be
asserted on the
exempt
organization or
trust that fails
to file a return
required under
IRC section 6034
(trusts) or IRC
section 6043(b)
(terminations,
etc., of exempt
organizations)
on the date and
in the manner
prescribed.
-
The daily
delinquency
penalty for any
one return for
this section
shall not exceed
$10 per day for
each day the
failure
continues, with
a maximum
penalty of
$5,000 per
return.
-
IRC section
6652(c)(2)(B) —
Penalty on Managers.
-
IRC section
6652(c)(2)(B)
provides for a
daily
delinquency
penalty to be
asserted on the
person that
fails to comply
with the demand
that a return
required under
IRC section 6034
or 6043(b) be
filed or
information be
furnished by a
reasonable
future date (90
days after the
mailing date of
the demand).
-
The daily
delinquency
penalty for any
one return for
this section
shall not exceed
$10 per day for
each day the
failure
continues, with
a maximum
penalty of
$5,000 on all
persons for the
failure to file
any one return.
20.1.8.2.1.3
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Assertion
-
Penalties for late
filing of required
returns are usually
asserted at Service
Centers when returns
are processed.
-
Penalties may be
asserted by
examining officers
for delinquent
returns secured by
them, or for
failures described
above.
-
IRC section
6652(c)(1)(A)
and (c)(2)(A)
penalties should
be assessed
using Master
File procedures.
-
All other IRC
section 6652(c)
penalties
discussed in
this Section
should be
assessed using
Non-Master File
procedures. See
IRM 20.1.8.1.1.
20.1.8.2.1.4
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Computation
-
"Person" refers to
any officer,
director, trustee,
employee or other
individual under a
duty to perform the
act which is the
cause of the
violation.
-
There is joint and
several liability
for these penalties
whenever more than
one person is
liable.
20.1.8.2.1.5
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Relief
-
No penalties should
be asserted under
IRC section 6652 if
any failure is due
to reasonable cause.
Recent examination
of criteria
previously
identified as
reasonable cause was
clarified. Penalty
relief falls into
four separate
categories. They
are:
-
Reasonable Cause
-
Statutory
Exceptions
-
Administrative
Waivers, and
-
Correction of
Service Error.
-
See IRM 20.1.8.1.3
and IRM 20.1.4 for
post-assessment
appeal procedures.
-
See IRM 20.1.8.1.3
and Exhibit 20.1.8–3
for a discussion of
penalty relief.
20.1.8.2.2
(07-05-2000)
Assessable Penalties
with Respect to
Liability for Tax
Under Chapter 42—IRC
section 6684
-
IRC section 6684 was
added to the Code by
Public Law 91-172 and
affects private
foundation managers
after December 31,
1968.
-
Public Law 100-203,
effective after
December 22, 1987, IRC
section 6684, makes
the provisions also
applicable to managers
of "other tax-exempt
organizations."
20.1.8.2.2.1
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Assertion
-
IRC section 6684
provides that a
penalty may be
asserted on any
person, as defined
by IRC section
7701(a)(1), liable
for tax under
Chapter 42, Private
Foundations and
Certain Other Tax
Exempt Organizations
(except IRC section
4940, Excise Tax
Based on Investment
Income or IRC
section 4948(a),
Application of Taxes
and Denial of
Exemption with
Respect to Certain
Foreign
Organizations) when
they acted
improperly or failed
to act if:
-
that person was
previously
liable for
private
foundation tax,
or
-
the act or
failure to act
is both willful
and flagrant.
-
The term "willful
and flagrant" is
defined in IRC
section 507(a)(2)(A)
as:
-
Willful repeated
acts (or
failures to
act), or
-
Willful and
flagrant acts
(or failures to
act).
-
The penalty is
assessed using
Non-Master File
(NMF) procedures.
See IRM 20.1.8.1.3
and IRM 20.1 4 for
post-assessment
appeal procedures.
20.1.8.2.2.2
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Computation
-
The penalty is equal
to the amount of the
excise tax for which
it is determined the
person is liable.
20.1.8.2.2.3
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Relief
-
The penalty does not
apply if reasonable
cause for the act or
failure to act can
be affirmatively
shown by the person
upon whom the
penalty is imposed.
-
See IRM 20.1.1.3 and
Exhibit 20.1.8–3 for
a discussion of
penalty relief.
20.1.8.2.3
(07-05-2000)
Assessable Penalty
Regarding Public
Inspection
Requirements For
Certain Tax Exempt
Organizations—IRC
section 6685
-
IRC section 6685 was
added to the Code by
Public Law 91-172 and
became effective for
taxable years
beginning after
December 31, 1969. IRC
section 6685 was
amended by Public Law
100-203, for years
beginning after
December 31, 1986. For
a tax-exempt
organization, other
than a private
foundation, the
increase of the
penalty to $5,000
became effective June
8, 1999. For private
foundations, the
increase in the
penalty to $5,000
becomes effective on
the 60th day after the
Treasury issues final
regulations under IRC
section 6104(d) that
apply to private
foundations. This
penalty applies to any
officer, director,
trustee, employee, or
other individual who
is under a duty to,
and willfully fails
to, comply with the
public disclosure
requirement of IRC
section 6104(d). This
amendment extend the
penalty to managers of
all tax-exempt
organizations and for:
-
Applications for
exemption
submitted to the
Service after July
15, 1987, and
-
Copies of
applications for
exemption on hand
which were
submitted prior to
July 15, 1987.
-
This penalty will be
assessed using
Non-Master File
procedures. The EO
specialist will
prepare a Form 5734
and a Penalty Case
File. See IRM
20.1.8.1.3.
-
The penalty in IRC
section 6685 is in
addition to the
penalty imposed by IRC
section 7207 (relating
to Fraudulent Returns,
Statements, or other
Documents).
20.1.8.2.3.1
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Assertion
-
IRC section 6685
provides that the
penalty is asserted
for the willful
failure to comply
with the public
disclosure
requirements of IRC
section 6104(d).
-
Before asserting
penalties for
failure to comply
with the public
disclosure
requirements of IRC
section 6104(d), the
Service should
obtain a statement
from an individual
denied inspection,
or a copy of an
application for
recognition of
exemption or an
annual information
return. The
statement should
describe the
request, including
the date the request
was made and the
reason for the
individual's belief
that the denial was
in violation of the
legal requirements.
The Service should
also obtain a
response from the
person required to
disclose its
application and
annual information
returns.
-
For this IRC
section, a person is
defined as any
officer, director,
trustee, employee,
member, or other
individual whose
duty it is to
perform the act.
-
See IRM 20.1.8.1.3
and IRM 20.1.4 for
post-assessment
appeal procedures.
20.1.8.2.3.2
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Computation
-
Effective June 8,
1999, IRC section
6685 imposes a
penalty of $5,000
with respect to each
willful failure to
disclose an
application or
return as required
by IRC section
6104(d). For a
willful failure to
comply with the IRC
section 6104(d)
requirements that
occur prior to June
8, 1999, the penalty
is $1,000.
-
For a person who is
under a duty to
comply with the IRC
section 6104(d)
disclosure
requirements
applicable to
private foundations,
IRC section 6685
imposes a penalty of
$1,000 with respect
to each willful
failure to disclose
an application or
return as required
by IRC section
6104(d). The penalty
will increase to
$5,000 on the 60th
day after the
Treasury issues
final regulations
under IRC section
6104(d) that apply
to private
foundations.
20.1.8.2.3.3
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Relief
-
The penalty may not
be waived for
reasonable cause.
20.1.8.2.4
(07-05-2000)
Failure to Disclose
that Contributions
are
Nondeductible—IRC
section 6710
-
IRC section 6710 was
added by Public Law
100-203 and is
effective for
solicitations made
after January 31,
1988.
-
IRC section 6710
imposes a penalty on
an organization that
fails to disclose that
contributions or gifts
made to this
organization (or on
behalf of this
organization) are not
deductible as
charitable
contributions for
federal income tax
purposes (IRC section
6113).
20.1.8.2.4.1
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Assertion
-
Each solicitation
must disclose (in a
conspicuous and
easily recognized
format) that
contributions or
gifts made to this
organization are not
deductible as
charitable
contributions for
Federal Income Tax
purposes.
-
Generally, the
penalty applies to
organizations which
are not described in
IRC section 170(c)
but are described in
IRC section 501(c)
and are tax exempt
under IRC section
501(a).
-
The penalty also
applies to a
political
organization (as
defined in section
527(e)).
-
When asserting the
penalty use NMF
procedures in IRM
20.1.8.1.3.
-
See IRM 20.1.8.1.3
and IRM 20.1.4 for
post-assessment
appeal procedures.
20.1.8.2.4.2
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Computation
-
IRC section 6710(a)
provides for a
penalty of $1,000
per day each day the
failure occurred up
to a maximum of
$10,000 during any
calendar year.
-
IRC section 6710(c)
provides an
exception to the
maximum annual
penalty of $10,000.
When it is shown
that the failure was
due to intentional
disregard, the
penalty shall be the
greater of:
-
$1,000 per day
or
-
50 percent of
the daily
combined cost of
all the
solicitations
where a failure
to disclose
occurred,
and the penalty
shall not be
taken into
account in
applying such
limitations to
other penalties
under IRC
section 6710(a).
-
Consider the
following when
determining the day
a failure to meet
the requirement
occurred.
20.1.8.2.4.3
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Relief
-
IRC section 6710(b)
provides that no
penalty shall be
imposed if the
failure under IRC
section 6710(a) was
due to reasonable
cause.
-
IRC section 6710(c)
does not provide a
reasonable cause
exception for the
Intentional
Disregard penalty.
-
See IRM 20.1.1.3 and
Exhibit 20.1.8–3 for
a discussion of
penalty relief.
20.1.8.2.5
(07-05-2000)
Failure to Disclose
Availability of
Information or
Service from Federal
Government—IRC
section 6711
-
IRC section 6711 was
added by Public Law
100-203 and is
effective for offers
and solicitations made
after January 31,
1988.
20.1.8.2.5.1
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Assertion
-
IRC section 6711
provides that when a
tax-exempt
organization offers
to sell (or solicits
money for) specific
information or
offers to provide
routine service for
any individual that
could be readily
obtained by such
individual free of
charge (or for a
nominal charge) from
an agency of the
Federal Government,
the tax-exempt
organization must,
when making such
offer or
solicitation make
"an express
statement" that the
information can be
obtained from the
Federal Government.
-
This requirement
applies only if the
information to be
provided involves
the specific
individual
solicited. For
example, the
requirement applies
with respect to
obtaining the social
security earnings
record or the social
security
identification
number of an
individual
solicited.
-
Material and/or
services available
from the Federal
Government for less
than $2.50,
including postage
and handling costs,
meet the nominal
charge requirement.
-
The failure to make
such express
statement is due to
the intentional
disregard of this
requirement.
-
This penalty is
assessed using NMF
procedures in IRM
20.1.8.1.3.
-
See Section 4 for
post-assessment
appeal procedures.
20.1.8.2.5.2
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Computations
-
For each day a
failure occurred,
the penalty shall be
the greater of:
-
$1,000 per day
or
-
50 percent of
the daily
combined cost
for all the
offers and
solicitations
where a failure
to disclose
occurred.
-
Consider the
following when
determining the day
a failure to meet
the requirement
occurred.
20.1.8.2.5.3
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Relief
-
The penalty may not
be waived for
reasonable cause.
20.1.8.2.6
(07-05-2000)
Failure to Meet
Certain Disclosure
Requirements—IRC
section 6714
-
IRC section 6714 was
added by Public Law
103-66 and is
effective for quid pro
quo contributions made
after December 31,
1993.
-
IRC section 6714
provides for a penalty
to be asserted against
organizations that did
not disclose quid pro
quo contributions in
excess of $75 as
required under IRC
section 6115(a).
20.1.8.2.6.1
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Assertion
-
IRC section 6115(b)
defines "quid pro
quo contribution" as
a payment:
-
Made partly as a
contribution and
partly in
consideration
for goods or
services
provided to the
payor (donor) by
the donee
organization;
and
-
Not
made to a
religious
organization, in
return for which
the taxpayer
received only an
intangible
religious
benefit that
generally would
not be sold in a
commercial
transaction.
-
IRC section 6115
provides that
organizations
described in IRC
section 170(c)
(except governmental
instrumentalities
described in IRC
section 170(c)(1))
are required to
provide a written
statement to each
donor in connection
with the
solicitation or
receipt of the
contribution.
-
That statement
must provide the
donor with a
good faith
estimate of the
amount of the
contribution
that is
deductible for
Federal income
tax purposes.
-
The amount of
the deductible
contribution is
limited to the
excess of any
money (and the
value of any
property other
than money)
contributed by
the donor, that
exceeds the
value of the
goods or
services
received.
-
The penalty is
assessed using NMF
procedures in IRM
20.1.8.1.3.
-
See IRM 20.1.4 for
post-assessment
appeal procedures.
20.1.8.2.6.2
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Computation
-
IRC section 6714
provides for a
penalty of $10 per
failure to provide
the required written
statement to the
payor (donor). The
maximum penalty per
fund raising event
or mailing shall not
exceed $5,000.
20.1.8.2.6.3
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Relief
-
The penalty does not
apply if the
organization can
establish that the
failure to provide
the written
statement was due to
reasonable cause.
-
When asserting the
penalty use NMF
procedures in IRM
20.1.8.1.3.
-
See IRM 20.1.1.3 and
Exhibit 20.1.8–3 for
a discussion of
penalty relief.
20.1.8.3 (07-05-2000)
Employee Plans
-
In general, TE/GE
penalties involve plans
which are subject to the
Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of
1974 (ERISA) which defer
the receipt of
compensation. The TE/GE
penalties which are
frequently encountered
are discussed in this
section.
-
In general, TE/GE
penalties are subject to
deficiency procedures
described in IRM
20.1.1.4. Where this is
not the case, the
exceptions have been
noted
|
20.1.8.3.1
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Relief
-
Recent review of
criteria previously
identified as
reasonable cause has
been clarified. See
IRM 20.1.1.3 for a
discussion of all
forms of penalty
relief. Penalty relief
falls into four
separate categories.
They are:
-
Reasonable Cause
-
Statutory
Exceptions
-
Administrative
Waivers, and
-
Correction of
Service Error.
-
IRM 20.1.1.3.3
discusses the fact
that reliance on the
advice of a tax
advisor is limited to
issues generally
considered technical
or complicated.
-
United States v.
Boyle, 469
U.S. 241 (1985),
states that the
responsibility to
file, pay or deposit
taxes cannot be
excused by reliance on
the advice of a tax
advisor. It requires
no special training or
effort on a taxpayer's
part to ascertain a
deadline and ensure
that it is met.
20.1.8.3.2
(07-05-2000)
Annual Registration
and Other
Notification by
Pension Plan—IRC
section 6652(d)(1)
-
IRC section 6652(d)(1)
imposes a penalty on a
plan administrator
(see IRC section
6057(a)(1)) for the
failure to file by the
due date, the Schedule
SSA, Annual
Registration Statement
Identifying Separated
Participants with
Deferred Vested
Benefits. In general,
plans subject to this
requirement are those
which result in the
deferral of
compensation.
-
Plans subject to this
requirement include
all qualified plans or
annuities under IRC
section 401(a) or
403(a), and, in
general, other
deferred compensation
plans.
-
Plans not subject to
this requirement
include:
-
IRC section
414(d), government
plans;
-
IRC section
414(e), church
plans where no IRC
section 410(d)
election has been
made;
-
Any plan which has
not (after
September 2, 1974)
provided employer
contributions;
-
Any plan
established and
maintained by a
society, order, or
association
described in IRC
section 501(c)(8)
or (9), if no part
of the
contributions are
made by employers
of participants in
such plan; and
-
Any plans exempted
pursuant to ERISA
section 102, such
as top hat and
excess benefit
plans;
-
Plans that cover
only owners and
their spouses.
20.1.8.3.2.1
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Assertion
-
In general, IRC
section 6057(a)
requires a plan
administrator to
file a registration
statement for each
plan year. This
registration
statement should
include:
-
The name of the
plan;
-
The name and
address of the
plan
administrator;
-
The name and
taxpayer
identification
number of each
participant in
the plan, who—is
separated from
service covered
by the plan
during the plan
year (if not
reported in the
year of
separation, such
separated
participant must
be reported in
the following
year); is
entitled to a
deferred vested
benefit; and did
not receive
retirement
benefits;
-
The nature,
amount and form
of deferred
vested benefit,
and
-
Other
information the
Service may
require.
-
The Schedule SSA
must be filed as an
attachment to Form
5500, Annual
Return/Report of
Employee Benefit
Plan.
-
Due Date:
See IRM
20.1.8.3.3.2.
-
Extensions of
time to file:
See IRM
20.1.8.3.4(5).
-
Assess penalties
under IRC section
6652(d)(1) on the
plan administrator
(as defined in IRC
section 414(g), Plan
Administrator).
-
Penalties under IRC
section 6652(d)(1)
are assessed on NMF.
They are computed
after the return is
processed at the
Master File, or they
may be asserted by
the EP/EO
specialist.
20.1.8.3.2.2
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Computation
-
The penalty for
failing to file on
the due date, is
equal to:
-
$1 for each
participant (for
whom the
required
information was
not filed);
-
Multiplied by
the number of
days the failure
continues.
-
The penalty
shall not exceed
$5,000 for any
plan year.
-
For purpose of
the penalty, the
failure to
report either
the
participant's
name or SSN is
considered a
failure to
report the
participant.
-
Exceptions for
(1)(d) above are
granted for Foreign
Nationals who are
not required to have
an SSN. For example:
-
Form contains 10
names, but only
8 show an SSN.
The penalty
would be $2
times (1) (b)
above.
-
Form contains 50
names, but it
showed 60 SSNs.
The penalty
would be $10
times (1)(b)
above.
20.1.8.3.2.3
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Relief
-
IRC section
6652(d)(1) provides
for non-assertion of
the penalty if the
plan administrator
can show reasonable
cause for the
failure to timely
file.
-
The request for
"penalty relief" due
to reasonable cause
must be made in the
form of a written
statement providing
all the facts
alleged as
reasonable cause.
The statement must
contain a
declaration by the
appropriate
individual that the
statement is made
under penalties of
perjury.
-
See IRM 20.1.1.3 for
a discussion of
penalty relief.
20.1.8.3.3
(07-05-2000)
Change of Status
Notice—IRC section
6652(d)(2)
-
IRC section 6652(d)(2)
imposes a penalty on
the plan administrator
for the failure to
notify the Service, by
the due date, of
changes in the status
of a plan as required
in IRC section
6057(b).
-
In general, the plans
subject to this
requirement are those
plans which result in
the deferral of
compensation.
-
Plans subject to this
requirement include:
-
All qualified
plans or annuities
under IRC section
401(a) or 403(a),
and
-
In general, other
deferred
compensation
plans.
-
Plans
not subject
to this requirement
include:
-
IRC section
414(d), government
plan;
-
IRC section
414(e), church
plan where no IRC
section 410(d)
election has been
made;
-
A plan which has
not (after
September 2, 1974)
provided employer
contributions; and
-
A plan established
and maintained by
a society, order,
or association
described in IRC
section 501(c)(8)
or (9), if no part
of the
contributions are
made by employers
of participants in
such plan.
-
Any plans exempted
pursuant to ERISA
section 102 such
as top hat or
excess benefits
plans.
20.1.8.3.3.1
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Assertion
-
IRC section 6057(b)
requires the plan
administrator to
notify the Service
of:
-
Any change in
the name of the
plan;
-
Any change in
the name and
address of the
plan
administrator;
-
Termination of
the plan;
-
Merger or
consolidation of
the plan with
any other plan;
or
-
Division of the
plan into two or
more plans.
-
Due Date:
See IRM
20.1.8.3.3.2.
-
Extensions of
time to file:
See IRM
20.1.8.3.4(5).
-
Assess penalties
under IRC section
6652(d)(2) on the
plan administrator
(as defined in IRC
section 414(g), Plan
Administrator).
-
Penalties under IRC
section 6652(d)(2)
are assessed on NMF.
They are computed
after the return is
processed at the
Master File, or they
may be asserted by
the EP/EO
specialist.
20.1.8.3.3.2
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Computation
-
The penalty for
failing to file the
form on the due date
in the prescribed
manner is equal to:
-
$1 for each
failure;
-
Multiplied by
the number of
days the failure
continues.
-
The penalty
shall not exceed
$1,000 for
failure to file
any
notification.
20.1.8.3.3.3
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Relief
-
IRC section
6652(d)(2) provides
for non-assertion of
the penalty if the
plan administrator
can show reasonable
cause for the
failure to timely
file.
-
The request for
"penalty relief" due
to reasonable cause
must be made in the
form of a written
statement providing
all the facts
alleged as
reasonable cause.
The statement must
contain a
declaration by the
appropriate
individual that the
statement is made
under penalties of
perjury.
-
See IRM 20.1.1.3 for
more information
relating to penalty
relief.
20.1.8.3.4
(07-05-2000)
Information Required
in Connection with
Certain Plans of
Deferred
Compensation,
Etc.—IRC section
6652(e)
-
Prior to January 1,
1997, IRC section
6652(e) imposes a
penalty for failure to
file annual returns
and statements by the
due date and in the
prescribed manner
required under:
-
IRC section 6058,
relating to
certain plans of
deferred
compensation;
-
IRC section 6047,
relating to
certain trusts,
annuity and bond
purchase plans;
and
-
IRC section 6039D,
relating to
certain fringe
benefit plans.
-
After December 31,
1996, IRC section
6652(e) continues to
impose a penalty for
failure to file annual
returns and statements
by the due date and in
the prescribed manner
required under:
-
IRC section 6058,
relating to
certain plans of
deferred
compensation, and
-
IRC section 6039D,
relating to
certain fringe
benefit plans.
-
However, IRC
section 6047(d),
relating to
certain trusts,
and annuity and
bond purchase
plans, is
penalized under
IRC section 6721.
-
In general, IRC
section 6058(a),
requires the employer,
or the plan
administrator, of each
funded plan of
deferred compensation,
to file an annual
return (Form 5500
(series), Annual
Return/Report of
Employee Benefit
Plan). See Exhibit
20.1.8–1, Plans Filing
Requirements, and
Exhibit 20.1.8–2,
Plans Exempt From
Filing.
-
Due Date:
In general, the due
date for the Form
5500, Annual
Return/Report of an
Employee Benefit Plan,
and appropriate
schedules is:
-
Full plan year:
The appropriate
Form 5500 and its
applicable
schedules must be
filed by the last
day of the 7th
month after the
plan year ends.
-
Short plan
year:
Form 5500 and its
applicable
schedules must be
filed by the last
day of the 7th
month after the
short plan year
ends.
-
Extension of Time to
File:
-
A one time
extension of time
to file (up to 21/2
months) may be
granted for filing
the Form 5500
(series) and its
required
schedules.
-
An extension of up
to 6 months may be
granted for filing
Form 5330 (Return
of Excise Taxes
Related to
Employee Benefit
Plans).
-
Form 5558
(Application for
Extension of Time
to File Certain
Employee Plan
Returns) must be
filed before the
normal due date of
the Form 5500
(series) and Form
5330.
-
Plans are
automatically granted
extensions of time to
file Form 5500 and its
required schedules
until the extended due
date of the Federal
income tax return of
the employer and are
not required to file
Form 5558, if all the
following conditions
are met:
-
The plan year and
the employer's tax
year are the same;
-
The employer has
been granted an
extension of time
to file its
Federal income tax
return to a date
later than the
normal due date
for filing the
Form 5500; and
-
A copy of the
extension of time
to file the
Federal income tax
return is attached
to the Form 5500
filed with the
Service.
-
Plans granted an
extension under the
conditions in (5)
above, cannot further
extend the due date by
filing a Form 5558.
20.1.8.3.4.1
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Assertion
-
The penalty is
imposed against the
person responsible
for failure to file.
-
In general, IRC
section 6058(b),
requires a plan
administrator to
file an actuarial
statement of
valuation evidencing
compliance with IRC
section 401(a)(12).
-
The Form 5310–A,
Notice of Plan
Merger,
Consolidation,
or Transfer of
Plan Assets or
Liabilities, was
designated by
the Service as
the form to be
used for
satisfying the
requirements.
-
The Form 5310–A
should be filed
when there is a
plan merger,
consolidation,
spinoff, or when
there is a
transfer of
assets or
liabilities to
another plan,
When meeting
this criteria,
Form 5310–A
should be filed
by the plan
administrator or
plan sponsor for
a pension plan,
profit-sharing
plan, or a
deferred
compensation
plan (except a
multi-employer
plan covered by
PBGC insurance).
-
The Form 5310–A
must be filed at
least 30 days
prior to a plan
merger,
consolidation,
spinoff, or
transfer of
liabilities to
another plan.
The form is late
if not filed at
least 30 days
before any of
these referenced
activities.
-
The instructions to
Form 5310–A provide
that a Form 5310–A
is not to be filed
for:
-
An eligible
rollover that is
paid directly to
an eligible
retirement plan
in a direct
rollover as
described in IRC
section
401(a)(31),
Optional Direct
Transfer of
Eligible
Rollover
Distributions;
or
-
The plan merger
or
consolidation,
spinoff, or
transfer of plan
assets or
liabilities
complies with
Regs.
1.414(l)-1(d),
Merger of
defined
contribution
plans, Regs.
1.414(l)-1(h),
De minimis rule
for merger of
defined benefit
plan, Regs.
1.414(I)-1(m),
Spinoff of a
defined
contribution
plan, or Regs.
1.414(I)-1(n)(2),
Spinoff of a
defined benefit
plan, de minimus
rule.
-
In general, IRC
section 6047(d)
requires Form 1096
(Annual Summary and
Transmittal of U.S.
Information Returns)
and Form 1099–R
(Distributions From
Pensions, Annuities,
Retirement or
Profit-Sharing
Plans, IRA's,
Insurance Contracts,
etc.) to be filed by
the employer
maintaining, or the
plan administrator
of, a plan from
which designated
distributions may be
made, or by the
issuer of a contract
under which such
distributions may be
made.
-
Designated
distributions
are defined in
IRC section
3405(e)(1) and
include,
generally, any
includible
non-wage
distributions
from an employer
deferred
compensation
plan, an IRA, or
a commercial
annuity.
-
A separate Form
1099–R must be
made for each
payee, but is
not required if
the aggregate
payment to the
payee is less
than $10.
-
Form 1099–R is
required to be
furnished to the
payee by January
31 following the
year of the
distribution;
Form 1096 with
Forms 1099–R is
required to be
filed with the
Service by
February 28
following the
year of the
distribution.
-
The penalty
under IRC
section 6652(e)
does not apply
to Forms 1099–R
due (determined
without
extensions)
after December
31, 1996.
Instead, the
penalties under
IRC sections
6721 and 6722
apply.
-
In general, IRC
section 6039D
requires every
employer maintaining
a specified fringe
benefit plan, to
file a Form 5500 and
Schedule F, Fringe
Benefit Plan Annual
Information Return.
Schedule F must be
attached to page 1
of Form 5500
(series),
Return/Report of
Employee Benefit
Plan.
-
Plans generally
required to file
are IRC section
125, Cafeteria
Plans and IRC
section 127,
Educational
Assistance
Programs, and
IRC section 137,
Adoption
Assistance
Programs.
-
Plans generally
not required to
file are IRC
section 127,
Educational
Assistance
Programs (when
only job-related
training that is
deductible under
IRC section 162,
Trade or
Business
Expenses), IRC
section 79,
Group Term-Life
Insurance
Purchased for
Employees, IRC
section 105,
Amounts Received
Under Accident
and Health
Plans, IRC
section 106,
Contributions By
Employer to
Accident and
Health Plans;
IRC section 120,
Amounts Received
Under Qualified
Group Legal
Services Plans;
and IRC section
129, Dependent
Care Assistance
Programs.
-
Rev. Rul. 84-54,
1984-1 C.B. 260,
provides that IRC
section 6652(e)
penalties do not
apply to the failure
to file the
following Form 5500
schedules, but
rather the penalties
imposed by IRC
sections 6692 and
6652(d)(1):
-
Schedule B,
Actuarial
Information
-
Schedule SSA,
Annual
Registration
Statement
Identifying
Separated
Participants
with Deferred
Vested Benefits.
-
Assess penalties
under IRC section
6652(e) on the plan
administrator (as
defined in IRC
SECTION 414(g), Plan
Administrator). The
penalty under IRC
section 6652(e)—
-
is assessed on
NMF.
-
is computed
after the return
is processed at
the Master File,
or it may be
asserted by the
EP/EO
specialist.
20.1.8.3.4.2
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Computation
-
The penalty for
failing to file the
form on the due date
in the prescribed
manner is equal to:
-
$25 for each
failure;
-
Multiplied by
the number of
days the failure
continues.
-
The penalty
shall not exceed
$15,000 on any
person for the
failure to file
any return.
20.1.8.3.4.3
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Relief
-
IRC section 6652(e)
provides for
non-assertion of the
penalty if
reasonable cause can
be shown.
-
The request for
"penalty relief" due
to reasonable cause
must be made in the
form of a written
statement providing
all the facts
alleged as
reasonable cause.
The statement must
contain a
declaration by the
appropriate
individual that the
statement is made
under penalties of
perjury.
-
In
Alton OB-Gyn,
Ltd. v. United
States,
789 F. 2d 515 (7th
Cir. 1986), the
taxpayer's reliance
on a bank, as plan's
trustee, to handle
ministerial duties
of taxpayer's
pension and
profit-sharing
plans, did not
constitute
reasonable cause for
the failure to
timely file the
required Form 5500
series return.
20.1.8.3.5
(07-05-2000)
Failure to Give
Notice to Recipients
of Certain Pension
Etc.
Distributions—IRC
section 6652(h)
-
IRC section 6652(h)
imposes a penalty for
each failure to give
notice concerning
withholding to
recipients of
distributions from an
employer's deferred
compensation plan or
an IRA as required by
IRC section
3405(e)(10)(B). The
penalty is imposed on
the payor.
20.1.8.3.5.1
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Assertion
-
In general, IRC
section
3405(e)(10)(B)
requires that the
"payor of:
-
Any annuity or
similar periodic
payment must
provide the
"Payee" a notice
of the right to
elect not to
have withholding
made on such
payment; or
-
Any distribution
which is not in
the form of an
annuity or a
periodic
distribution
must provide the
"Payee" a notice
of the right to
elect not to
have withholding
made on such
payment.
-
In general, these
requirements pertain
to payments and
distributions made
from employer
deferred
compensation plans,
individual
retirement plans,
and commercial
annuities.
-
Due Date:
The notice of
election must be
transmitted no
earlier than six
months before the
first payment and no
later than when the
first payment is
made.
-
For periodic
payments, notice
must also be
provided at
least once in
each calendar
year of the
right to make
and revoke the
election.
-
Temporary Regs.
35.3405-1 D-21,
D-22, D-25, and
D-26 provides
examples of
notices that can
be used to
satisfy the
notice
requirements.
-
The penalty under
IRC section 6652(h)
is identified by the
TE/GE specialist.
-
The penalty is
assessed on NMF.
20.1.8.3.5.2
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Computation
-
The penalty under
IRC section 6652(h)
is $10 for each
failure to give
notice, up to a
maximum penalty of
$5,000 for all such
failures per
calendar year.
20.1.8.3.5.3
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Relief
-
IRC section 6652(h)
provides for
non-assertion of the
penalty if the payor
can show that the
failure was due to
reasonable cause and
not willful neglect.
-
See IRM 20.1.1.3 for
a discussion of
penalty relief.
20.1.8.3.6
(07-05-2000)
Failure to Give
Written Explanations
of Qualifying
Rollover
Distributions—IRC
section 6652(i)
-
IRC section 6652(i)
imposes a penalty for
each failure to timely
provide a written
explanation of an
eligible rollover
distribution as
required by IRC
section 402(f),
Written Explanation to
Recipients of
Distributions Eligible
for Rollover
Treatment.
20.1.8.3.6.1
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Assertion
-
In general, IRC
section 402(f)
requires plan
administrators of
qualified plans to
provide a written
explanation to
recipients of
eligible rollover
distributions that
explains:
-
The rules under
which a
recipient may
elect a direct
rollover to an
eligible
retirement plan;
-
Withholding of
income tax if
there is no
direct rollover;
-
The rules which
permit tax
deferral on the
distribution if
it is rolled
over into an
eligible
retirement plan
within 60 days
of distribution;
-
If applicable,
the notice must
also contain
information
regarding IRC
section 402(d),
Tax on Lump Sum
Distributions,
and
-
Other Rules
Applicable to
Exempt Trusts.
-
In general an
eligible retirement
plan includes the
following:
-
IRC section
408(a),
individual
retirement
accounts
-
IRC section
408(b),
individual
retirement
annuity (other
than an
endowment
contract)
-
IRC section
401(a), trusteed
plans
-
IRC section
403(a) annuity
plans
-
An eligible rollover
distribution means
any distribution to
an employee of all
or part of the
balance to the
credit of the
employee in a
qualified trust,
other than certain
periodic payments,
hardship
distributions, and
distributions
required by IRC
section 401(a)(9).
-
Due Date:
The explanation must
be provided no less
than 30 days and no
more than 90 days
before the date of
the distribution.
-
The penalty under
IRC section 6652(i)
is identified by the
EP specialist.
-
The penalty is
assessed on NMF.
20.1.8.3.6.2
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Computation
-
The penalty under
IRC section 6652(i)
is $10 for each
failure to provide a
written explanation,
up to a maximum
penalty of $5,000
for all such
failures per
calendar year.
-
In addition,
effective for
returns, reports,
and other statements
due after December
31, 1996, section
1455 of the Small
Business Job
Protection Act of
1996 (SBJPA) amends
the computation of
the IRC section
6652(i) penalty by
changing the $10
penalty to $100 and
the $5,000 maximum
to $50,000.
20.1.8.3.6.3
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Relief
-
IRC section 6652(i)
provides for
non-assertion of the
penalty if the payor
can show that the
failure was due to
reasonable cause and
not willful neglect.
-
See IRM 20.1.1.3 for
a discussion of
penalty relief.
20.1.8.3.7
(07-05-2000)
Fraudulent Statement
or Failure to
Furnish Statement to
Plan Participant—IRC
section 6690
-
IRC section 6690
imposes a penalty on a
plan administrator
who:
-
Willfully fails to
furnish a
statement to a
plan participant
showing the
information at the
time and in the
manner required by
IRC section
6057(e),
Individual
Statement to
Participant, or
-
Willfully
furnishes a false
or fraudulent
statement.
20.1.8.3.7.1
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Assertion
-
In general, the
individual statement
to a participant,
required by IRC
section 6057(e) and
Regs.
301.6057-(1)(e) must
include the
following:
-
A description of
the
participant's
deferred vested
retirement
benefit;
-
Information
filed with
respect to the
participant on
Schedule SSA,
Annual
Registration
Statement
Identifying
Separated
Participants
with Deferred
Vested Benefits;
and
-
Advise the
participant of
any benefits
that are
forfeitable in
the event the
participant dies
before a certain
date. See IRC
section 6057(a).
-
Due Date:
The due date for
delivering the
statement to the
individual is no
later than the due
date (including
extensions) for the
Schedule SSA that
reports information
with respect to the
individual.
-
The penalty under
IRC section 6690 can
be identified by the
EP specialist.
-
The penalty is
assessed on NMF.
-
The penalty under
IRC section 6690 is
not subject to
deficiency
procedures described
in IRM 20.1.4.3.
20.1.8.3.7.2
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Computation
-
The penalty is
imposed at $50 for
each act or failure
with no maximum.
20.1.8.3.7.3
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Relief
-
IRC section 6690
provides a penalty
for willfully
failing to failing
to provide the
statement, or
willfully furnishing
a false or
fraudulent
statement.
20.1.8.3.8
(07-05-2000)
Failure to File
Acturarial
Report—IRC section
6692
-
IRC section 6692
imposes a penalty on
the plan administrator
of a defined benefit
plan to which IRC
section 412 (Minimum
Funding Standard)
applies, when the plan
administrator fails to
file an actuarial
report (Form 5500, Sch
B), in the time and
manner as required by
IRC section 6059,
Periodic Report of
Actuary.
20.1.8.3.8.1
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Assertion
-
The penalty under
IRC section 6692 is
imposed if there is
a failure to file
Schedule B,
Actuarial
Information, which
must be filed as an
attachment to the
appropriate Form
5500 (series)
return.
-
The penalty is
imposed on the plan
administrator. If
more than one plan
administrator is
responsible for the
failure, all are
jointly and
severally liable.
-
Due Date:
See IRM
20.1.8.3.3.2.
-
The penalty under
IRC section 6692 is
assessed on NMF.
-
The penalty may be
computed when the
return is filed or
asserted by the EP
specialist.
20.1.8.3.8.2
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Computation
-
The penalty is
imposed at $1,000
for each failure to
file.
-
The penalty is
computed after the
return is processed
at the master file.
20.1.8.3.8.3
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Relief
-
IRC section 6692
provides for
non-assertion of the
penalty if the
responsible party
can show that the
failure was due to
reasonable cause.
Note:
The failure of an
actuary to give
the plan
administrator a
complete Schedule
B on time is not
reasonable cause.
-
The request for
"penalty relief" due
to reasonable cause
must be made in the
form of a written
statement providing
all the facts
alleged as
reasonable cause.
The statement must
contain a
declaration by the
appropriate
individual that the
statement is made
under penalties of
perjury.
-
See IRM 20.1.1.3 for
a discussion of
penalty relief.
20.1.8.3.9
(07-05-2000)
Failure to Provide
Reports on Certain
Tax-Favored Accounts
or Annuities;
Penalties Relating
to Designated
Nondeductible
Contributions—IRC
section 6693
-
Covered under this
sub-section are each
of the penalties
imposed by IRC section
6693:
-
IRC section
6693(a), Person
required to report
or file a
disclosure
statement;
-
IRC section
6693(b)(1),
Overstatement of
Designated
Nondeductible
Contributions;
-
IRC section
6693(b)(2),
Failure to File
Form; and
-
IRC section
6693(c), Penalties
Relating to Simple
Retirement
Accounts.
Note:
Section 1455 of the
SBJPA amends IRC
section 6693(a) to
provide that the
penalty thereunder
does not apply to
information returns
or payee statements
regarding payments
to other persons
required by IRC
section 408(i) or
6047(d). The failure
to satisfy IRC
sections 408(i) and
6047(d) regarding
payments to other
persons is penalized
under IRC sections
6721 and 6722.
20.1.8.3.9.1
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Assertion—IRC
section 6693(a)
-
IRC section 6693(a)
imposes a penalty on
the failure to
furnish a report
required by IRC
section 408(i) and
(l).
-
IRC section 408(i)
requires that:
-
Annual calendar
year reports be
made on Form
5498, Individual
Retirement
Arrangement
Information,
concerning the
status of the
account or
annuity.
-
Each trustee or
issuer required
to file Form
5498 is also
required to
furnish the
participant a
statement
containing the
information
required to be
furnished on
Form 5498 plus
the value of the
account or
annuity at the
end of the
calendar year. A
copy of the Form
5498 may be used
to satisfy this
requirement.
-
The disclosure
statements and
copies of the
governing
instruments be
provided to
benefited
individuals. A
benefited
individual is
the individual
for whom an
individual
retirement
account,
individual
retirement
annuity, or an
endowment
contract is
established. A
benefited
individual also
includes both
the working and
non-working
spouse in the
case of spousal
individual
retirement
accounts.
Note:
The penalty for
failure to satisfy
these requirements
of IRC section
408(i) is imposed
on the trustee of
an individual
retirement account
or, in the case of
an individual
retirement annuity
or endowment
contract, the
issuer. This
includes an
account or annuity
that is part of a
SEP or a SIMPLE
IRA plan.
-
IRC section 408(l)
requires that an
employer who:
-
Makes
contributions to
a simplified
employee pension
(SEP) on behalf
of employees
make reports to
employees upon
adoption of the
SEP indicating
its adoption,
contribution
requirements,
and allocation
basis.
-
Adopts a SEP
furnish
employees a
written
statement each
calendar year
indicating the
amount of
employer
contribution to
the employee's
IRA. This
requirement is
satisfied if the
information is
contained on the
employee's W–2
for the calendar
year in which
the contribution
is made.
Note:
The penalty
for failure to
satisfy these
requirements
of IRC section
408(I) is
imposed on the
employer
maintaining
the SEP.
-
Due Date: IRC
section 6693(a):
-
The annual
report is to be
filed,
accompanied by
transmittal Form
1096, on or
before May 31
following the
calendar year
for which the
Form 5498 is
required.
-
In general, the
disclosure
statement and a
copy of the
governing
instrument must
be received by
the benefited
individual at
least seven days
preceding the
earlier of the
date of
establishment or
purchase of the
account,
annuity, or
endowment
contract.
-
Reports required
on the adoption
of a SEP are to
be furnished to
an employee no
later than a
reasonable time
after the later
of the time the
employee becomes
employed or the
time of the
adoption of the
simplified
employee pension
arrangement.
-
SEP contribution
reports made on
Form W–2 are
required to be
furnished to the
employee no
later than the
later of 30 days
after the
contribution or
January 31 the
calendar year
for which the
contribution was
made.
-
IRC section 6693(a)
also applies to
reports required to
be filed under:
-
IRC section
220(h) relating
to medical
savings accounts
( "MSAs" );
-
IRC section
529(d) (relating
to qualified
State tuition
programs)
(effective after
December
31,1997); and
-
IRC section
530(h) (relating
to education
individual
retirement
accounts).
20.1.8.3.9.2
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Assertion—IRC
section 6693(b)(1)
and (2)
-
IRC section
6693(b)(2) imposes a
penalty on the
failure to furnish
information under
IRC section
408(o)(4).
-
IRC section
408(o)(4) requires
that an individual
who makes designated
nondeductible
contributions to an
IRA for any taxable
year or receives a
distribution from an
IRA to which
nondeductible
contributions have
been made for any
taxable year report
such contributions
or distribution, as
well as other
information, on Form
8606, Nondeductible
IRAs.
-
IRC section
6693(b)(1) imposes a
penalty on the
overstatement of
designated
nondeductible
contributions made
on Form 8606.
-
The penalty for
failure to satisfy
the requirements of
IRC section 408(o)
is imposed on the
taxpayer who made
the contributions or
received the
distribution.
-
Due Date.
Form 8606 is
required to be filed
as an attachment to
the Form 1040
(series). If no 1040
return is required,
the Form 8606 must
still be filed by
the due date of the
Form 1040.
-
The penalty under
IRC section 6693(a)
and (b):
-
Can be
identified by
the EP field
agent;
-
Is assessed on
NMF; and
-
Is not subject
to deficiency
procedures
described in IRM
20.1.1.4.
20.1.8.3.9.3
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Assertion—IRC
section 6693(c)
-
IRC section 6693(c)
imposes a penalty on
the failure to
furnish certain
information required
under IRC section
408(i) and 408(l)(2)
to participants in
SIMPLE IRA plans
described in IRC
section 408(p).
-
IRC section
408(l)(2)
requires that
the trustee or
issuer of IRA
set up to
receive
contributions
under an
employer's
SIMPLE IRA plan
each calendar
year furnish the
employer a
summary
description
containing
information
regarding the
SIMPLE IRA plan,
the employer
maintaining the
plan, and the
trustee or
issuer.
-
IRC section
408(l)(2) also
requires that an
employer
maintaining a
SIMPLE IRA plan
notify eligible
employees of
their right to
participate in
the plan. Such
notice
must include a
copy of the
applicable
summary
description.
-
IRC section
408(i) requires
that the trustee
or issuer of
SIMPLE IRAs
provide the
SIMPLE IRA
owners within 31
days after each
calendar year a
statement
showing the
account balance
at the close of
the calendar
year and the
account activity
during that
calendar year. A
copy of the Form
5498 may be used
to satisfy this
requirement.
-
Further
information on
the summary
description, the
notice, and the
statement
described above
can be found in
sections G and H
of Notice 98-4,
1998-2 I.R.B.
25.
-
The penalty for
failure to satisfy
the requirement of
IRC sections 408(i)
and 408(l)(2)
described above is
imposed on:
-
The trustee or
issuer of IRAs
set up to
receive
contributions
made under a
SIMPLE IRA plan,
in the case of
the summary
description and
the statement
requirement.
-
The employer, in
the case of the
notice
requirement.
-
Due Date:
-
The employer's
notice to
employees must
be provided
immediately
before the
60-day election
period (during
which eligible
employees can
make or change
salary deferral
elections)
described in IRC
section 408(p)
and Notice 98-4.
-
The summary
description must
be provided to
the employer by
the trustee or
issuer in time
for the employer
to meet its
notice
requirement,
described above.
(In most cases
the summary
description will
be due the
employer shortly
before November
2 of each
calendar year).
-
The statement
from the trustee
or issuer is due
the IRA owner no
later than 31
days after the
end of the
calendar year.
20.1.8.3.9.4
(07-05-2000)
Penalty
Computation
-
The computation for
the penalties are as
follows:
20.1.8.3.9.5
(07-05-2000)
Penalty Relief
-
IRC section 6693
provides for
non-assertion of the
penalty if it is
shown that the
failure is due to
reasonable cause.
-
Q&A H-1(3),
Notice 98-4,
1998-2 I.R.B.25,
provides that
the penalty
imposed on a
trustee under
IRC section
6693(c) does not
apply when the
trustee timely
provides the
required
information
directly to the
employee covered
by the SIMPLE
IRA plan.
-
Q&AG-3 of Notice
98-4 provides
that the penalty
imposed on an
employer under
IRC section
6693(c) does not
apply when an
employee covered
by the SIMPLE
IRA plan has
selected his or
her own trustee
and the
information
regarding that
trustee is not
available at the
time the
employer is
required to
provide the
notice
containing such
information to
the employee,
provided the
employer takes
steps to ensure
the missing
information
reaches the
employee as soon
as reasonably
possible.
-
The request for
"penalty relief" due
to reasonable cause
must be made in the
form of a written
statement providing
all the facts
alleged as
reasonable cause.
The statement must
contain a
declaration, made by
the appropriate
individual, that the
statement is made
under penalties of
perjury. See IRM
20.1.1.3 for a
discussion of
penalty relief.
Exhibit 20.1.8-1
(07-05-2000)
Plans Filing
Requirements
Exhibit 20.1.8-2
(07-05-2000)
Plans Exempt from
Filing
Exhibit 20.1.8-3
(07-05-2000)
EO REASONABLE CAUSE
GUIDELINES
|
|
20.1.9.1 (08-07-1998)
Overview
-
This section of the consolidated
penalty IRM discusses penalties
assessed against taxpayers that
are U.S. persons doing business
outside the United States, and
foreign entities doing business in
the United States.
Unless
otherwise indicated, the term
"U.S. person" includes
individuals, corporations,
partnerships, estates or trusts.
Refer to IRC section 7701(a).
20.1.9.1.1 (08-07-1998)
Chapter Outline
-
The penalties listed below are
discussed in detail in this
section. As of the date of
publication of this IRM,
regulations have not been issued
regarding the penalty or the
application of the penalty so
noted [*]. Therefore, the
penalty should not be imposed
until regulations are published.
CAUTION: It
is important that, before
assertion of any penalty, the
examiner be aware of the
statute, regulations, any
exceptions or limitations, etc.
that may apply to the case at
hand. This chapter only provides
a brief description of each
penalty and is not meant to be a
substitute for research.
|
IRC Section |
Description |
|
6038(b) |
Failure to furnish
information with respect
to controlled foreign
corporation. IRC section
6038(a). |
|
6038(c) |
Failure to furnish
information with respect
to controlled foreign
corporation. IRC section
6038(a). |
|
6038A(d) |
Failure to furnish
information or to
maintain records by
certain 25 percent
foreign owned
corporations. IRC
section 6038A(a). |
|
6038A(e) |
Failure to authorize an
agent or failure of a
reporting corporation to
substantially and timely
comply with a summons
for records. IRC section
6038A(e). |
|
6038B(b) |
Failure to furnish
information on transfers
of property to foreign
persons. IRC section
6038B(a). |
|
6038C(c)* |
Failure to furnish
information or maintain
records by a foreign
corporation engaged in
U.S. trade or business.
IRC section 6038C(a).
Regulations have not
been issued.
|
|
6038C(d)* |
Failure to authorize an
agent or failure of a
reporting corporation to
substantially and timely
comply with a summons
for records. IRC section
6038A(e). Regulations
have not been issued.
|
|
6652(f)* |
Failure to provide
information on foreign
persons holding direct
investment in U.S. real
property. IRC section
6039C. Regulations have
not been issued.
|
|
6677 |
Failure to file
information returns with
respect to certain
foreign trusts. IRC
section 6048. |
|
6679* |
Failure to file required
information with respect
to certain foreign
corporations or foreign
partnerships. IRC
sections 6035, 6046 and
6046A. Regulations have
not been issued under
IRC section 6046A.
|
|
6683 |
Failure of a foreign
corporation to file
return of personal
holding company tax. IRC
section 541. |
|
6686 |
Failure by DISC or FSC
to file return or supply
information. IRC section
6011(c). |
|
6688 |
Failure to meet
requirements of
coordination of U.S. and
possession individual
income tax as specified.
IRC section 7654. |
|
6689 |
Failure to file notice
of redetermination of
foreign tax. IRC
sections 905(c) and
404A(g). |
|
6712 |
Failure to disclose
treaty-based return
positions. IRC section
6114. |
-
A quick reference chart of
reporting/filing
responsibilities of taxpayers,
and applicable penalties is in
Exhibit
20.1.9–1 of this
section.
-
The guidelines and
administrative procedures for
the penalties are discussed in
IRM 20.9.2, Penalty Guidelines
and Procedures.
-
Exhibit
20.1.9–2 provides a
list and description of the
forms mentioned in this section.
20.1.9.1.2 (08-07-1998)
Other Applicable Penalties
-
U.S. and foreign taxpayers are
subject to criminal penalties
such as willful failure to file
a return (IRC section 7203) and
filing a false or fraudulent
return (IRC section 7206).
-
IRC sections 6662(e)
(Substantial Valuation
Misstatement under Chapter 1)
and 6662(h) (Increase in Penalty
in case of Gross Valuation
Misstatements) address the
coordination of IRC section 482
and the accuracy-related
penalty.
-
Specifically, these
penalties apply to
substantial and gross
valuation misstatements
attributable to IRC section
482 transfer price
adjustments on returns with
years ending after November
5, 1990.
-
Return Related Penalties are
discussed in another section
of this IRM. Also refer to
Rev. Proc. 94–33.
-
The following reporting/filing
requirements are subject to
penalties discussed in other IRM
20.1 sections. For example:
Failure to File, Failure to Pay,
Failure to Deposit and the
Miscellaneous Penalty chapters.
-
IRC sections 1441 and
1442—Withholding of Tax on
Nonresident Aliens and
Foreign Corporations. Forms
1042 and 1042S.
-
IRC section 1445—Withholding
of Tax on Dispositions of
U.S. Real Property
Interests. Forms 8288 and
8288A.
-
IRC section 1446—Withholding
Tax on Foreign Partner’s
Share of Effectively
Connected Income. Forms
8804, 8805, and 8813.
-
IRC section
6039E—Information Concerning
Resident Status. Statement
required.
-
See
Exhibit 20.1.9–2 for
a list of forms mentioned in
this section.
20.1.9.2 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Guidelines and
Procedures
-
In General.
Contained in this section are some
items common to all the penalties
discussed in this section.
Exceptions are noted in the
discussions of the specific
penalties.
-
Statute of
Limitations. Penalties
that are not
considered
taxes generally have
no statute
of limitation for
assessment. For penalties subject
to deficiency procedures, the
limitation for assessment is three
years after the return is due or
filed, whichever is later. Refer
to IRC 6501(c) for some
exceptions.
-
Reasonable
Cause. Determinations
as to whether or not reasonable
cause exists must be based on a
careful consideration of the facts
and circumstances of each case
prior to the assertion of a
penalty. Examiners should consider
any reason a taxpayer provides in
conjunction with the guidelines,
principles and evaluating factors
set forth in the Reasonable Cause
chapter 20.1.1, as well as the
applicable IRC section and Treas.
Regs. relating to the specific
penalty.
20.1.9.2.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Assertion
-
The penalties included in this
section are asserted by
examiners (i.e. international
examiners, revenue agents, tax
auditors, or service center
personnel).
-
The examiner determines whether
a taxpayer has failed to comply
with the reporting/filing
requirements, solicits any facts
regarding reasonable cause from
the taxpayer, and makes a
determination of whether the
taxpayer has established
reasonable cause. If reasonable
cause does not exist, or exists
for only a portion of the time,
the examiner then computes the
amount of the penalty to be
asserted.
20.1.9.2.2 (08-07-1998)
Administrative Procedures
-
In
General. When an
examiner secures a delinquent
information return and/or
statement, the examiner will
date stamp and photocopy the
document and place it in the
Penalty Case File. The original
delinquent information return
and/or statement will be
forwarded to the appropriate
service center.
-
Forms 5471
and 5472 Only.
-
The examiner who secures a
delinquent Form 5471 or 5472
will write in red
"DELINQUENT RETURN—SECURED
BY EXAMINATION—PENALTY
CONSIDERED"
across the top of the Form
with the date received. A
copy
of the delinquent form with
the above annotation must be
forwarded to the Director,
Service Center, 11601
Roosevelt Boulevard,
Philadelphia, PA 19155,
Attention: Statistics of
Income Forms 5471 and 5472
Processing Coordinator, P:DP
Unit F, Drop Point DP 335.
-
Area Directors and Service
Center Directors are
authorized to make
determinations that failure
to file these information
returns was due to
reasonable cause.
-
Foreign
information returns not secured
by examiners in the
International Enforcement
Program (IEP). These
returns will be routed through
the local Case Processing
Support to the Area Program
Manager-International for
evaluation regarding IEP
participation. Refer to AIMS
Handbook.
20.1.9.2.3 (08-07-1998)
Assessment Procedures
-
Certain penalties and additions
to tax are treated as taxes and
therefore are subject to the
notice of deficiency procedures.
IRC section 6671 provides that
penalties shall be assessed and
collected in the same manner as
taxes, but its application is
limited to the penalties
contained in Subtitle F, Chapter
68B (Assessable Penalties).
However, some of these penalties
are by statute assessable
without regard to deficiency
procedures.
-
Some of the penalties for
failure to file information
returns are governed by IRC
section 6665(b). This IRC
section specifically exempts
failure to file under IRC
section 6651 from deficiency
procedures, except in the case
of an addition to tax which is
attributable to a deficiency in
tax as defined in IRC section
6211.
-
EXHIBIT
20.1.9–3 of this
section lists those penalties
subject to deficiency or
non-deficiency procedures for
assessment processing purposes.
-
The penalties are generally
assessed by the function’s
closing unit in the field or in
the service center.
20.1.9.2.3.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalties NOT Subject to
Deficiency Procedures
-
Penalties not subject to
deficiency procedures are
usually assessed, collected,
and posted to the Master File.
Two MFTs (IMF 55, BMF 13) were
created to process an
assessment (or abatement) of
these non-deficiency penalties
via the Civil Penalty Module.
These miscellaneous penalty
cases are not controlled on
AIMS.
-
CAUTION: These
penalties should not be
entered on Forms 870, 4549,
4549A, or any other
examination report. For the
preparation of the
International Examiners report
refer to IRM 4.60.
-
The taxpayer’s signature
is not required with
respect to these
penalties. If the taxpayer
agrees to the penalty
assessment, solicit full
payment.
-
Payments will be processed
using Form 3244.
Transaction Code (TC) 640
should be used to indicate
an advance payment and TC
670 should be used for any
payments received after
assessment.
-
The examiner will complete the
computation of the penalty on
Forms 3645 and 8278.
-
Form
3645. A
separate Form 3645 must be
used for each tax period
to be assessed. Under the
"Explanation" section,
provide a concise
explanation of the
reason(s) for assertion of
the penalty and whether
agreed or unagreed. The
examiner will consider
reasonable cause and
record on Form 886–A, if
needed, all pertinent
information including,
facts, law, taxpayer’s
position and conclusion.
This will be attached to
Form 3645 which becomes
part of the examination
report.
-
Form
8278. This Form
is the adjustment document
for the Civil Penalty
Module. The penalty
adjustment is posted to
the module using the
Reference Codes reflected
on the Form 8278. (1) A
separate Form 8278 is
required for each tax year
and code section for which
a penalty assessment is
made. That is, one Form
8278 cannot be used to
assess penalties under
different code sections,
even if all penalties are
to be assessed against the
same tax year. Multiple
violations of an IRC
section are to be shown as
a single assessment. (2)
When additional penalties
are to be assessed for
continued failure after
notification (e.g., under
IRC section 6038A(d)), a
Form 8278 must be prepared
for each subsequent
assessment that is to be
made. (3) Refer to the
back of the Form 8278 for
preparation instructions.
Note: For Box 5
of Form 8278, a Fiscal or
Calendar Year may be used
with Reference Codes 614,
619, 623, and 625. (4) The
Reference Codes included
in the Penalty Description
section of Form 8278 are
the Reference Numbers
referred to in
Exhibit 20.1.9–3
of this section.
-
Preparation of Penalty Case
File. Examiners
will establish a separate case
file for penalties that
contains:
-
The Forms 3645, with 886A
if needed, and 8278,
-
A copy of the information
return and/or statement,
plus a copy of page one of
the income tax return,
-
A current transcript,
-
The contact sheet or case
history worksheet,
-
Taxpayer’s statement of
reasonable cause including
a copy of any written
advise given to the tax
payer, any explanation for
denying reasonable cause
with a copy of the
associated workpapers.
-
Form 3198 should be
attached to the outside of
the penalty case file and
annotated in the "Other"
section as follows:
"Assess
[IRC Section]
Civil Penalty as indicated
on Form 8278."
-
NOTE: It
is advantageous to maintain a
copy of the penalty case file
documentation with the tax
case file (if one exists).
This is done in order to
assist in making an abatement
determination or for appeal
purposes while the penalty
case file is still being
processed.
-
More than one penalty case
file is required when
penalties have been proposed
under more than one IRC
section.
20.1.9.2.3.2 (08-07-1998)
Penalties Subject to
Deficiency Procedures
-
Penalties within this section
that are subject to deficiency
procedures are assessed just
as any other penalty would be
that relates to an examination
determined deficiency (see
20.1.9.2.3.1 above).
-
Form 5344 (initiated in
examination) is used to assess
penalties subject to
deficiency procedures. The
Case Processing Support area
will code and edit the form
using established procedures
in the AIMS Handbook.
Assessment amounts with the
appropriate Reference Numbers
are entered in the positive
field portion of Item 15 of
Form 5344. Abatement amounts
are entered in the negative
portion.
20.1.9.2.4 (08-07-1998)
Abatement of Penalties (Unpaid
Assessments)
-
In certain instances, taxpayers
will ask for reconsideration of
a penalty that has been assessed
but not paid. The examiner will
determine whether all the facts
were considered when the penalty
was assessed.
-
If the taxpayer shows reasonable
cause after the penalty is
assessed, abate the portion of
the penalty only for the period
for which the taxpayer shows
reasonable cause.
-
Enter Penalty Reason Code 62
(on Form 3870 or Form 5344,
as appropriate) for
adjustments involving
reasonable cause
consideration, whether or
not the abatement is
allowed. Refer to IRM
20.1.1.7 and Exhibit
20.1.1–3 for additional
information on use of
penalty reason codes.
-
The procedures for abating
the penalty are the same as
they are for assessing the
penalty.
-
If the taxpayer disagrees with
the examiner’s final
determination, an informal
conference may be requested with
the examiner’s manager. If the
taxpayer still disagrees, the
examiner will advise the
taxpayer in writing (by
appropriate pattern letter) that
the adjustment has been
reviewed.
20.1.9.2.5 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Appeals
-
IRM 20.1.4, Method of Appealing
Penalties, provides a discussion
of the various legislative and
administrative remedies for
those taxpayers disagreeing with
the Service’s determination.
-
The method for appealing
penalties is dependent upon
whether the penalties are
subject to deficiency procedures
or to postassessment appeals
(see IRM 20.1.1.4.2 and IRM
20.1.1.4.1 respectively).
20.1.9.3 (08-07-1998)
IRC Section 6038(b) [Dollar
Penalty]
-
Background.
P.L. 97–248, (TEFRA), supplemented
the existing reduction of the
foreign tax credit under IRC
section 6038 by adding a fixed
dollar penalty of $1,000 up to
$25,000 for failure to furnish
information with respect to a
controlled foreign corporation.
This penalty applies to
information for annual accounting
periods ending after September 3,
1982.
-
Reporting/Filing Requirement.
-
IRC section 6038(a) and Treas.
Reg. 1.6038–2(a) require a
U.S. person to furnish
information with respect to
any controlled foreign
corporation. The information
required includes, among other
things, foreign corporation
entity data, stock ownership
data, financial statements,
and intercompany transactions
with a related person.
-
A
taxpayer meets the requirement
by providing the required
information on a timely filed
Form 5471. A Schedule M
attached to Form 5471 is used
to report related party
transactions. The information
is for the annual accounting
period of the foreign
corporation ending with or
within the U.S. person’s
taxable year. Form 5471 is
filed with the U.S. person’s
income tax return on or before
the date required by law for
the filing of that person’s
income tax return. Treas. Reg.
1.6038–2(i).
20.1.9.3.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Assertion
-
The examiner must establish that
the taxpayer:
-
Was a U.S. person,
-
Owned stock possessing more
than 50 percent of the total
combined voting power of all
classes of stock entitled to
vote, or more than 50
percent of the total value
of shares of all classes of
stock of the foreign
corporation, and
-
Failed to timely file the
required information on Form
5471.
20.1.9.3.2 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
In
General. The basic
penalty is $1,000 per failure to
timely file complete information
on the Form 5471 and Schedule M.
-
Increase
in Penalty for Continued
Failure.
-
If failure continues for
more than 90 days after
notice by the Area Director
(or his/her authorized
delegate), the penalty shall
be increased in the amount
of $1,000 for each 30 day
period, or fraction thereof,
during which such failure
continues after the
expiration of the 90-day
period.
-
Example. Taxpayer
files Form 1120 return for
the 1990 calendar year on
March 15, 1991, but does not
file required Form 5471. On
February 1, 1992, notice is
issued to the taxpayer
regarding the penalty
assessed. Examiner
calculates the penalty from
May 1, 1992, the first day
after expiration of the 90
day period, to August 1,
1992, when the delinquent
return was received. In
addition to the $1,000 basic
penalty, the taxpayer is
assessed $3,000 because the
failure to file information
continued for three full
months after expiration of
the 90-day period.
-
NOTE: The
total penalties for IRC
6038(b) are limited to
$25,000.
-
Coordination with IRC section
6038(c). The amount
of the IRC section 6038(c)
penalty is reduced by the amount
of the dollar penalty imposed by
IRC section 6038(b).
20.1.9.4 (08-07-1998)
IRC Section 6038(c) [Reduction
of Foreign Tax Credit]
-
Background.
P.L. 86–780 added IRC section
6038(c) (formerly (b)) effective
for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 1960. This section
provides for a reduction in
foreign tax credit for a failure
to furnish information with
respect to a controlled foreign
corporation that is required to be
filed under IRC section 6038.
-
Language was later added
limiting the foreign tax
credit reduction to the
greater of $10,000 or the
income of the foreign
corporation for the applicable
accounting period, effective
for annual accounting periods
beginning after December 31,
1962.
-
P.L. 97–248, (TEFRA) amended
IRC section 6038 by
redesignating subsection (b)
as subsection (c), and by
changing the subsection title
to read Penalty of Reducing
Foreign Tax Credit. The
amendment was effective for
annual accounting periods
ending after September 3,
1982.
-
Reporting/Filing Requirement.
See IRM 20.1.9.3 above.
20.1.9.4.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Assertion
-
Refer to IRM 20.1.9.3 above.
20.1.9.4.2 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
In
General.
-
Application of IRC section
901. The amount
of taxes paid or deemed paid
is reduced by 10 percent.
-
Application of IRC sections
902 and 960. The
amount of taxes paid or
deemed paid is reduced by 10
percent. The 10 percent
reduction is not limited to
the taxes paid or deemed
paid by the foreign
corporation with respect to
which there is a failure to
file information but may
apply to the taxes paid or
deemed paid by all foreign
corporations controlled by
that person.
-
Additional Penalty for
Continued Failure.
If such failure continues
for more than 90 days after
notice by the Area Director
(or his/her authorized
delegate), the amount of the
reduction is 10 percent plus
an additional 5 percent for
each 3-month period, or
fraction thereof, during
which such failure continues
after the expiration of the
90-day period.
-
Limitation.The amount
of the foreign tax reduction for
each failure to furnish
information with respect to a
foreign corporation may not
exceed the greater of:
-
$10,000, or
-
The income of the foreign
corporation for its annual
accounting period with
respect to which the failure
occurs.
-
NOTE: No
taxes may be reduced more than
once for the same failure. Also,
the regulations have not been
updated; where the IRC currently
refers to a foreign
corporation’s "post 1986
undistributed income" , the
regulations still refer to
"accumulated profits" .
-
Coordination with IRC section
6038(b). The amount
of the IRC section 6038C penalty
is reduced by the amount of the
dollar penalty imposed by IRC
section 6038(b).
20.1.9.5 (08-07-1998)
IRC Section 6038A(d) [Monetary
Penalty]
-
Background.
IRC section 6038A(d) was added by
P.L. 97–248, (TEFRA), for tax
years beginning after December 31,
1982. It provides for a monetary
penalty for failure to furnish
information or to maintain records
as required by IRC section 6038A.
-
P.L. 101–239, (OBRA’89), amended
IRC section 6038A, to be effective
generally for tax years beginning
after July 10, 1989, by:
-
Reducing the level of foreign
ownership of a U.S. subsidiary
from 50 percent to 25 percent;
-
Adding a record maintenance
requirement;
-
Adding an authorization of
agent requirement;
-
Increasing the monetary
penalty from $1,000 to
$10,000;
-
Increasing the additional
monetary penalty from $1,000
to $10,000 for each 30 day
period during which the
failure continues after
receipt of notice of the
failure; and
-
Removing the $24,000 cap on
the increase in the monetary
penalty for continued failure.
-
P.L. 101–508, (OBRA’90), amended
IRC section 6038A(a), changing the
application of the reporting and
record maintenance requirements
and enacted IRC section 6038C to
apply the rules of IRC section
6038A to foreign corporations
engaged in U.S. trade or business
at any time during the taxable
year.
-
Reporting/Filing Requirement.
-
IRC section 6038A(a) and
Treas. Reg. 1.6038A–2 require
a reporting corporation to
furnish the following
information: name, business
address, nature of business,
country in which organized or
resident, nature of
relationship to reporting
corporation, and description
and value of transactions
between reporting corporation
and related party.
-
A
taxpayer meets the requirement
by timely filing the required
information on Form 5472. A
separate
Form 5472 must be
filed with regard to each
related party that has
reportable transactions with
the reporting corporation.
Form 5472 is due on the same
date, including extensions, as
the income tax return that is
required to be filed. A
taxpayer must file Form 5472
at the appropriate service
center, and must also file a
copy of Form 5472 with any
attachments and schedules at
the Philadelphia Service
Center (duplicate filing
required). Failure to file at
both places may result in a
penalty assessment.
-
A
taxpayer is also specifically
required to maintain relevant
records sufficient to allow
determination of the correct
tax treatment of the
transactions with a related
party (as defined in IRC
section 6038A(c)(2)).
-
De
minimis rules. A
reporting corporation that has
less than $10,000,000 in U.S.
gross receipts for a taxable
year is not subject to the
record maintenance requirement
or the authorization of agent
requirement. If the total
value of all gross payments
(both made and received) from
a foreign related party is not
more than $5,000,000 and is
less than 10 percent of its
U.S. gross income, the
reporting corporation is not
subject to the record
maintenance requirement and
the authorization of agent
requirement for those
transactions.
-
Applicable
Definitions.
-
Reporting Corporation.
A reporting corporation is a
domestic corporation that is
25 percent foreign-owned.
NOTE: Beginning
on November 6, 1990, a foreign
corporation engaged in a trade
or business within the U.S. at
any time during the taxable
year is a reporting
corporation under IRC 6038C.
Prior to that time a foreign
corporation was subject to the
25 percent foreign-owned
requirement.
-
25
Percent Foreign-Owned.
A corporation is 25 percent
foreign-owned if it has, at
any time during the taxable
year, at least one direct or
indirect 25 percent foreign
shareholder (a person owning
at least 25 percent of the
total voting power of all
classes of stock of such
corporation entitled to vote,
or the total value of all
classes of stock of such
corporation). The attribution
rules of IRC section 318
apply—see IRC section
6038A(c)(5).
-
Related
Party. The term
"related party" means any
direct or indirect 25 percent
foreign shareholder of the
reporting corporation; any
person who is related (within
the meaning of IRC section
267(b) or 707(b)(1)) to the
reporting corporation or to a
25 percent foreign shareholder
of the reporting corporation;
and any other person who is
related within the meaning of
IRC section 482 to the
reporting corporation.
-
Foreign
Person. The term
"foreign person" means any
person who is not a U.S.
person as defined in IRC
section 7701(a)(30), except
that any individual who is a
citizen of any possession of
the U.S. (but not otherwise a
citizen of the U.S.) and who
is not a resident of the U.S.
shall not be treated as a U.S.
person.
20.1.9.5.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Assertion
-
A penalty is asserted when the
examiner determines that:
-
A U.S. corporation is 25
percent foreign-owned during
a taxable year, and has had
transaction(s) with a
related party,
-
Has failed to timely file
Form 5472 or
-
Has failed to maintain
records of the
transaction(s) with the
related party.
-
NOTE: The
penalty also applies in the case
of records maintained outside of
the U.S. See Treas. Regs.
1.6038A–4(c) and
1.6038A–3(f)(2). A 25 percent
foreign-owned corporation may be
considered to have complied with
the requirement to maintain
records in the U.S. if it makes
the records available to the
Service within 60 days of the
request to produce them or
brings the records to the United
States and complies with notice
requirements under Treas. Reg
1.6038A–3(f)(2)(ii). If this is
not done, however, the penalty
would be applicable.
20.1.9.5.2 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
In
General. The basic
penalty is $10,000, for
each
taxable year, for
each
related party, for which the
Form 5472 was not filed, records
were not maintained, or records
maintained outside the U.S. were
not produced.
-
Increase
in Penalty for Continued
Failure. If any
failure described above
continues for more than 90 days
after the day on which the Area
Director (or his/her authorized
delegate) mails notice of such
failure to the reporting
corporation, the penalty shall
be increased in the amount of
$10,000 for each 30-day period,
or fraction thereof, during
which failure continues after
the expiration of the 90-day
period.
-
NOTE: The
basic penalty is applied only
once to each set of transactions
with a related party, even
though the taxpayer may be in
violation of multiple failures
(failure to file, failure to
maintain records, and/or failure
to comply with the non-U.S.
maintenance requirements).
-
After notification, the
additional penalty can be
assessed for
each failure with
respect to
each related
party. See Treas. Reg.
1.6038A–4.
20.1.9.5.3 (08-07-1998)
Reasonable Cause
-
The reasonable cause exception
shall be applied liberally in
the case of a small corporation
that:
-
Had no knowledge of the IRC
section 6038A requirements,
-
Has limited presence in and
contacts with the United
States, and
-
Promptly and fully complies
with all requests by the
Area Director related to the
failure.
-
NOTE: A
small corporation can only
qualify
once under this
special rule, because
once
notified by the IRS of the
failure, the corporation will
have knowledge of the IRC
section 6038A requirements.
-
The reporting corporation must
make an affirmative showing of
all the facts alleged as
reasonable cause in a written
statement.
-
See Treas. Reg. 1.6038A–4(b) in
its entirety for a discussion of
reasonable cause as it relates
to the applications of this IRC
section.
20.1.9.6 (08-07-1998)
IRC Section 6038(e)
[Noncompliance Penalty]
-
Background.
P.L. 101–239, (OBRA’89], effective
for tax years beginning after July
10, 1989, requires that a foreign
related party must authorize the
reporting corporation to act as
its limited agent for the purpose
of an IRS summons regarding
transaction(s) with the related
party. The penalty for failure to
authorize an agent or for failure
to produce records is described in
IRC section 6038A(e)(3).
-
Meeting of
Requirement. A taxpayer
meets the requirement by providing
an executed authorization of agent
within 30 days of a request by the
Service or, in the case of
production of records, by
complying with the request for
books, records or documents. The
penalty is not imposed if a
taxpayer quashes a summons other
than on grounds that the records
were not maintained as required by
IRC section 6038A(a).
-
Applicable
Definitions. See the
definitions discussed in IRM
20.1.9.5 above.
20.1.9.6.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Assertion
-
A penalty is asserted when the
examiner determines that:
-
The reporting corporation
has failed to respond
substantially and timely to
a proper summons for
records, or
-
A foreign related party,
upon request fails to
authorize the reporting
corporation as its agent for
IRS summons purposes,
pursuant to the requirements
set forth in Treas. Reg.
1.6038A–5.
-
NOTE: The
Examination Handbook provides
specific guidance for
implementing IRC section
6038A(e).
20.1.9.6.2 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
The noncompliance penalty
adjustment permits the Service,
in its sole discretion, to deny
deductions and adjust cost of
goods sold with respect to the
related party transaction(s)
based upon information avail-
able to the Service. See IRC
section 6038A(e)(3). The
noncompliance penalty is
reflected in the notice of
deficiency.
20.1.9.6.3 (08-07-1998)
Statute of Limitations
-
The running of any period of
limitations under IRC sections
6501 and 6531 may be suspended
as provided in IRC section
6038A(e)(4)(D).
20.1.9.6.4 (08-07-1998)
Reasonable Cause
-
THERE IS
NO REASONABLE CAUSE EXCEPTION TO
THIS PENALTY.
20.1.9.7 (08-07-1998)
IRC Section 6038B(b)
-
Background.
P.L. 98–369, (TRA’84), added IRC
section 6038B which requires
information to be furnished with
respect to certain transfers of
property by a U.S. person to a
foreign corporation. This section
also includes a substantial
penalty for failure to furnish the
information.
-
Reporting/Filing Requirement.
-
Transfers of Property.
IRC section 6038B(a) and the
temporary regulations issued
thereunder require that any
U.S. person that transfers
property (including stock or
securities) in an exchange
described in IRC section
367(a) or (d) to a foreign
corporation must report
certain information concerning
the transfer. See Treas. Reg.
1.6038B–1T(a). These rules are
generally effective with
respect to transfers occurring
after December 31, 1984, in
taxable years ending after
such date.
-
A
taxpayer meets the requirement
by filing Form 926 along with
the Federal income tax return
at the Internal Revenue
Service Center where that
return is required to be
filed. Temporary regulation
1.6038B–1T(b)(1) states that
notwithstanding any statement
to the contrary on Form 926,
the form and attachments must
be filed with the transferor’s
tax return for the taxable
year that includes the date of
the transfer.
-
Description
of Transfer.
-
A
transfer is described in IRC
section 367(a) if a U.S.
person transfers property to a
foreign person in connection
with an exchange described in
IRC section 332, 351, 354,
356, or 361, provided an
exception in IRC section
367(a) is not applicable. An
exchange described in IRC
section 332 is subject to IRC
section 6038B only in limited
instances. See (4)(b) below.
-
A
transfer is subject to IRC
section 6038B if a person has
made an election under IRC
section 1492(2)(B) to apply
the principles of this section
to a transfer described in IRC
section 1491.
-
NOTE: A
transfer is described in IRC
section 367(d) if a U.S.
person transfers intangible
property to a foreign
corporation in an exchange
described in IRC section 351
or 361.
-
Transactions
Not Covered.
-
IRC
section 336 distributions.
Although IRC section
6038B(a)(2) provides that U.S.
persons may be required to
provide information with
respect to IRC section 336
distributions to foreign
persons, the temporary
regulations limit the
application of IRC section
6038B to transfers described
in IRC section 367(a) or (d).
Thus, IRC section 336
distributions by U.S. persons
to foreign persons are not
subject to IRC section 6038B.
See Treas. Reg.
1.6038B–1T(b)(2).
-
IRC
section 367(e) distributions.
Although IRC section
6038B(a)(1) provides that U.S.
persons may be required to
provide information with
respect to distributions
described in certain IRC
sections including 355 and
332, the regulations under IRC
section 6038B state that no
notice shall be required with
respect to a distribution
described in IRC section
367(e). See Treas. Reg.
1.6038B–1T(b)(2). Because IRC
sections 355 and 332 are both
described in IRC section
367(e), no reporting under IRC
section 6038B generally is
required with respect to such
distributions. However, a
transfer of intangible
property by a U.S. subsidiary
to its foreign parent pursuant
to an exchange described in
IRC section 332 is described
under IRC section 637(a) and
is thus subject to reporting
under IRC section 6038B. See
Treas. Reg. 1.367(a)–5T(e).
20.1.9.7.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Assertion
-
A penalty is asserted when the
examiner establishes that the
taxpayer:
-
Is a U.S. person and has
made a transfer described in
IRC section 367(a) or (d) to
a foreign corporation,
-
Has failed to file timely
Form 926 and attachments as
specified in IRC section
6038B, and
-
Has not shown that such
failure to comply was due to
reasonable cause.
20.1.9.7.2 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
If a U.S. person fails to
furnish information in
accordance with IRC section
6038B regarding some or all of
the property transferred, then,
with respect to such property:
-
It is not considered to have
been transferred for use in
the active conduct of a
trade or business outside
the U.S. and does not
qualify for any other
exception under the
regulations of IRC section
367(a), and gain must be
recognized with respect to
that property to the extent
provided in IRC section
367(a);
-
The U.S. person must pay a
penalty equal to 25 percent
of the amount of gain
realized on the transfer of
such property (without
regard to whether gain is
recognized on the transfer);
and
-
The period for limitations
on assessment of tax on the
transfer of such property
does not begin to run until
the date on which the U.S.
person does comply with the
reporting requirements.
-
Example.
-
On January 1, 1989, in an
IRC section 351 exchange,
domestic corporation ABC
transferred to NEWCO, a
wholly-owned foreign
subsidiary, the following
property: machinery to be
used in the active conduct
of NEWCO’s trade or business
outside the U.S., inventory,
and all the stock of XYZ,
another wholly-owned foreign
subsidiary of ABC. ABC did
not furnish any information
to the IRS with respect to
the transfer as required by
IRC section 6038B.
-
The adjusted basis, the fair
market value, and resulting
gain/loss for the property
transfer is as follows:
-
As a result of the failure
to report: (1) The $50,000
gain on the transfer of the
machinery must be recognized
regardless of the fact that
under IRC section 367(a)(3),
and Treas. Reg. 1.367(a)–2T,
no gain (other than any
depreciation recapture
required under Treas. Reg.
1.367(a)–4T(b)) would have
been required to be
recognized if ABC had
properly reported the
transfer of the machinery.
(2) The $40,000 gain on the
transfer of the inventory
does not qualify for an
exception. This gain must be
recognized. Treas. Reg.
1.367(a)–5T(b). (3) The
$90,000 loss realized on the
transfer of the XYZ stock is
not recognized under IRC
section 367(a) and Treas.
Reg. 1.367(a)–1T(b)(3)(ii).
-
In addition to the above,
ABC must pay a penalty equal
to 25 percent of the $90,000
gain, or $22,500.
|
ASSET |
ADJ. BASIS |
FMV |
GAIN/(LOSS) |
|
Machinery |
$100,000 |
$150,000 |
$50,000 |
|
Inventory |
$ 60,000 |
$100,000 |
$40,000 |
|
XYZ stock |
$290,000 |
$200,000 |
($90,000) |
20.1.9.7.3 (08-07-1998)
Statute of Limitations
-
NOTE: The
exception of IRC section
6501(c)(8) only applies to the
tax
imposed by reason of IRC section
367(a), (d), or (e) and
not
to the IRC section 6038B(b)
penalty.
20.1.9.8 (08-07-1998)
IRC Section 6038C(c) [Monetary
Penalty]
-
Background.
P.L. 101–508, (OBRA’90), added IRC
section 6038C. This addition makes
foreign corporations engaged in
U.S. business subject to the same
information reporting and record
maintenance requirements that
apply under IRC section 6038A to
U.S. 25 percent foreign-owned
corporations, and penalizes them
in the same manner. Refer to IRM
20.1.9.5 above.
-
Reporting/Filing Requirements.
Foreign corporations subject to
this section must maintain any
records that were in existence on
or after March 20, 1990.
20.1.9.8.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
NOTE: Regulations
under IRC 6038C have not been
issued. Therefore, no penalty
can be asserted at this time
unless the taxpayer has
destroyed records in existence
on or after March 20, 1990. See
Treas. Reg. 1.6038A–3(h).
|
20.1.9.9 (08-07-1998)
IRC Section 6038C(d)
[Noncompliance Penalty]
-
Background.
P.L. 101–508, (OBRA’90), added IRC
section 6038C(d). This section
requires that a foreign related
party authorize the reporting
corporation to act as its limited
agent for summons purposes and
requires that the reporting
corporation maintain and produce
records regarding transaction(s)
with the foreign related party.
-
This penalty parallels the
penalty discussed above in IRM
20.1.9.6. The difference is
that the IRC section 6038A(e)
penalty applies to 25 percent
foreign-owned U.S.
corporations, and
-
IRC section 6038C(d) penalty
applies to foreign
corporations engaged in a
trade or business in the U.S.
at any time during the taxable
year, within the meaning of
IRC section 864(b).
-
Meeting of
Requirement. The
requirement is the same as that of
IRC section 6038A as found in IRM
20.1.9.6. Foreign corporations
subject to this section must
maintain any records that were in
existence on or after March 20,
1990.
-
Definitions.
See the definitions discussed in
IRM 20.1.9.6 above.
20.1.9.9.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
NOTE: Regulations
under IRC 6038C have not been
issued. Therefore, no penalty
can be asserted at this time
unless the taxpayer has
destroyed records in existence
on or after March 20, 1990. See
Treas. Reg. 1.6038A–3(h).
20.1.9.10 (08-07-1998)
IRC Section 6652(f)
-
Background.
IRC section 6652(f) provides a
penalty for failure to meet
reporting requirements under IRC
section 6039C.
-
Reporting/Filing Requirements.
-
IRC section 6039C requires any
foreign person holding a
direct investment in U.S.
property interests for a
calendar year to file a
return.
-
The requirement is met by
providing information such as
name and address, a
description of all U.S. real
property interests, and other
information prescribed by
regulation.
20.1.9.10.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Assertion
-
The penalty is applicable when
it has been established that the
foreign person has failed to
meet the above requirements.
20.1.9.10.2 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
NOTE: Regulations
under IRC 6039C have not been
issued. Therefore, the penalty
is not to be assessed for
failure to file as required by
this section.
20.1.9.11 (08-07-1998)
IRC Section 6677
-
Background.
P.L. 87–834, The Revenue Act of
1962, added IRC section 6677
effective on October 17, 1962.
This section provides a penalty
for failure to file an information
return with respect to a foreign
trust as required under IRC
section 6048.
-
Reporting/Filing Requirement.
-
Form
3520 is required to
be filed by a U.S. Person who
either creates a foreign trust
or transfers money or property
to a foreign trust. The form
is due no later than the 90th
day after the creation of the
trust or transfer of the
money, or property to a trust.
-
Form
3520A is required
to be filed by a U.S. person
who previously filed a Form
3520, as long as the trust has
at least one U.S. beneficiary.
The form is due by the 15th
day of the fourth month
following the end of the
taxable period covered by the
return.
20.1.9.11.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Assertion
-
A penalty is asserted when it
has been established that the
grantor or transferor of a
foreign trust has failed to meet
filing requirement discussed
above. The penalty applies if
the Forms 3520 and 3520–A do not
contain all of the required
information.
20.1.9.11.2 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
The penalty for failure to file
a timely, complete Form 3520 is
5 percent of the amount
transferred to a trust. For
failure to file a timely,
complete Form 3520–A, the
penalty is 5 percent of the
value of the corpus of the trust
at the close of the taxable
year. The penalty is limited to
$1,000 for failure to file
either Form 3520 or Form 3520A.
20.1.9.12 (08-07-1998)
IRC Section 6679
-
Background.
P.L. 87–834, the Revenue Act of
1962, added IRC section 6679
effective on October 17, 1962.
This section, as amended, provides
a penalty for failure to furnish
information and timely file a
return under IRC section 6035,
6046, or 6046A.
-
IRC section
6035 requires a U.S.
citizen or resident who is an
officer, director or 10 percent
shareholder of a foreign personal
holding company to file
Form 5471
with
Schedule N by the due
date of the taxpayer’s income tax
return, including extensions.
-
IRC section
6046 requires
Form 5471
with
Schedule O, to be filed
by the due date of the taxpayer’s
income tax return, including
extensions and must be filed by:
-
A
U.S. Citizen or resident who
is an officer or director of a
foreign corporation, 5 percent
or more in value of the stock
of which is owned by a U.S.
person,
-
A
U.S. person who owns 5 percent
or more in value of the stock
of a foreign corporation,
-
Each person who is treated as
a U.S. shareholder under IRC
section 953(c), or
-
Each person who becomes a U.S.
person while owning 5 percent
or more in value of the stock
of a foreign corporation.
-
IRC section
6046A requires any U.S.
person who acquires or disposes of
an interest in a foreign
partnership, or whose interest in
a foreign partnership changes
substantially to file such form as
Treas. Regs. provide. The return
is due on the 90th day after the
day on which the U.S. person
becomes liable to file (or later
date if prescribed by
regulations).
20.1.9.12.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Assertion
-
The examiner must establish that
the taxpayer has not provided
the required information on a
timely filed return.
20.1.9.12.2 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
The penalty is $1,000 per
failure.
-
NOTE: Regulations
under IRC sections 6046A have
not been issued. Therefore,
until issued the penalty under
IRC section 6679 should not be
assessed for failure to file as
required by this IRC section.
20.1.9.13 (08-07-1998)
IRC Section 6683
-
Background.
P.L. 89–809 (11–13–66), the
Foreign Investors Tax Act of 1966,
added IRC section 6683 effective
on January 1, 1967. This section
provides a penalty for failure to
file a true and accurate return of
the tax imposed by IRC section 541
(Personal Holding Company Tax).
-
Reporting/Filing Requirement.
-
Any foreign corporation which
is a personal holding company
(as defined in IRC section
542) is subject to personal
holding company tax with
respect to its income from
sources within the U.S.
-
A
Schedule PH must be filed with
a Form 1120. The due date is
the same as for Form 1120.
20.1.9.13.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Assertion
-
A penalty is asserted when it
has been established that a
foreign corporation is a
personal holding corporation,
and has failed to timely file
Schedule PH (Form 1120).
20.1.9.13.2 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
The penalty is computed by
multiplying the personal holding
company’s income tax (including
personal holding company tax
imposed by IRC section 541) by
10 percent.
20.1.9.13.3 (08-07-1998)
Statute of Limitations
-
The
personal holding company tax
may be assessed at any time
within 6 years after the Form
1120 for such year was filed.
Treas. Reg. 301.6501(f)–1.
20.1.9.14 (08-07-1998)
IRC Section 6686
-
Background.
P.L. 92–178, The Revenue Act of
1971, added IRC section 6686
effective for taxable years ending
after December 31, 1971.
-
Reporting/Filing Requirement.
IRC section 6011(c) requires the
following taxpayers to furnish
certain information to their
shareholders, furnish certain
information to the IRS, and keep
satisfactory financial books and
records:
-
A
DISC or IC–DISC is required to
supply its shareholders
information on Schedule K
(Form 1120 DISC or Form 1120
IC–DISC), which is due to the
shareholders on or before the
last day of the second month
following the close of its
taxable year;
-
A
FSC is required to file Form
1120–FSC by the 15th day of
the third month after the end
of corporation’s tax year;
-
A
corporation that has elected
to be an Interest Charge DISC
effective for taxable years
beginning after December 31,
1984, (or a DISC for prior
years) is required to file
Form 1120–IC–DISC, (or Form
1120–DISC in the case of
taxable years of DISCs
beginning prior to January 1,
1985) due on or before the
15th day of the 9th month
following the end of its tax
year; and
-
A
DISC, IC–DISC, or FSC shall
keep records supporting its
reporting of gross income,
deductions, credits and other
matters on its income tax
forms.
20.1.9.14.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Assertion
-
A penalty is asserted when the
examiner has established that:
-
The entity is a DISC, former
DISC, an IC–DISC, FSC, or
former FSC as defined in IRC
sections 992(a) and 922, and
has failed to timely file
Form 1120–DISC, Form
1120–IC–DISC, or Form
1120–FSC, as applicable, or
-
The entity is an IC–DISC or
DISC and has failed to
supply timely information to
shareholders on Schedule K.
20.1.9.14.2 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
The penalty under IRC section
6686 is $100 for each failure to
supply information to
shareholders on Schedule K. This
penalty is limited to a total of
$25,000. The taxpayer is
assessed a penalty of $1,000 for
each failure to file Form
1120–DISC, Form 1120–IC–DISC, or
Form 1120–FSC.
20.1.9.14.3 (08-07-1998)
Statute of Limitations
-
NOTE: It
is the Service’s position that
there is no statute of
limitations for the DISC or
IC–DISC.
20.1.9.15 (08-07-1998)
IRC Section 6688
-
Background.
P.L. 93–406 amended IRC section
6667 by renumbering it as IRC
section 6688, and making it
effective for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 1972.
This section provides a penalty
for failure to provide the IRS
with information allowing it to
implement the provisions of IRC
section 7654 with respect to
bonafide residents of Guam,
American Samoa, The Northern
Mariana Islands and the Virgin
Islands.
NOTE: TRA ’86 made IRC
section 7654(a) applicable to the
Virgin Islands and American Samoa
although the current regulations
under IRC section 7654 are only
applicable to Guam and The
Northern Mariana Islands.
-
Reporting/Filing Requirement.
-
The implementation of IRC
section 7654(a) requires that
bona fide residents of the
above cited U.S. possessions
provide information allowing
for the proper allocation of
income between the U.S. and
such possessions.
-
Pending new regulations under
IRC section 7654, bona fide
residents of these U.S.
possessions must generally
maintain records that identify
the proper allocation of
income between the U.S. and
such possessions.
20.1.9.15.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Assertion
-
The examiner asserts a penalty
on establishing that an
individual, as described above,
has not filed timely
information.
20.1.9.15.2 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
The examiner computes the
penalty at $100 per failure to
report.
20.1.9.16 (08-07-1998)
IRC Section 6689
-
Background.
IRC section 6689 was added by P.L.
96–603 applicable for taxable
years beginning after 1979. This
section provides a penalty for
failure to notify the Service of a
foreign tax redetermination with
respect to:
-
The amount of foreign taxes
paid or accrued pursuant to
IRC section 905(c),
-
The amount of the deduction
for certain foreign deferred
compensation plans under IRC
section 404A(g).
-
Reporting/Filing Requirement.
-
Foreign
Tax Redetermination.
A taxpayer is required to
notify the Service of any
foreign tax redetermination
that may affect U.S. tax
liability. A taxpayer must
provide notice by filing Form
1040X or 1120X and Form 1116
or 1118 within 180 days after
a foreign tax redetermination.
See Treas. Reg. 1.905–4T(b).
If a foreign tax
redetermination results in an
additional assessment of
foreign tax, the taxpayer has
the 10-year period provided by
IRC section 6511(d)(3)(A) to
file a claim for additional
foreign tax credits.
-
NOTE: When
a foreign tax redetermination
affects the indirect or deemed
paid credit under IRC section
902 for taxable years after
1986, the taxpayer must
provide notice by filing Form
1120X and Form 1118 for all
tax years affected by the
foreign tax credit
redetermination. See Treas.
Reg. 1.905–3T(d)(2)(iii).
Notwithstanding the
requirement in 1 above, Treas.
Reg. 1.905–4T(d) provides that
in no event shall the notice
be required prior to the
issuance of an announcement or
regulations concerning the
manner in which the notice
must be filed.
-
NOTE: Until
guidance has been issued, the
timeliness standard is
effectively suspended, and the
penalty may not be enforced.
-
Redetermination of IRC Section
404A Deduction. A
taxpayer is required to notify
the Service, in the time and
manner specified in
regulations, if the foreign
tax deduction for deferred
compensation expense is
adjusted. See IRC Section
404A(g)(2)(B).
-
Definition.
Foreign Tax Redetermination.
Treas. Reg. 1.905–3T(c) defines a
foreign tax redetermination as a
change in the foreign tax
liability that may affect a U.S.
taxpayer’s foreign tax credit and
includes:
-
A
refund of foreign taxes,
-
A
difference between the dollar
value of the accrued foreign
tax and the dollar value of
the foreign tax actually paid
attributable to differences in
the units of foreign currency
paid and the units of foreign
currency accrued, or
-
A
difference between the dollar
value of the accrued foreign
tax and the dollar value of
the foreign tax actually paid
attributable to fluctuations
in the value of the foreign
currency relative to the
dollar between the date of
accrual and the date of
payment.
20.1.9.16.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Assertion
-
A penalty is asserted when the
taxpayer has failed to notify
the Service of a foreign tax
redetermination.
20.1.9.16.2 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
The examiner determines the
deficiency attributable to the
foreign tax redetermination and
to this deficiency is added a
penalty computed as follows:
-
5 percent of the deficiency
if the failure is for not
more than 1 month, with
-
An additional 5 percent of
the deficiency for each
month (or fraction thereof)
during which the failure
continues, but not to exceed
in the aggregate 25 percent
of the deficiency.
-
NOTE: If
this penalty applies, then the
penalty imposed under IRC
section 6662(b)(1)), formerly in
IRC section 6653(a), relating to
failure to pay by reason of
negligence or disregard of rules
or regulations, shall not apply.
20.1.9.16.3 (08-07-1998)
Statute of Limitations
-
IRC section 6501(c)(5)
independently suspends the
normal statute of limitations
for additions to tax resulting
from a redetermination of
foreign tax. IRC section 905(c)
contains special rules for such
changes.
20.1.9.17 (08-07-1998)
IRC Section 6712
-
Background.
IRC section 6712 was added by P.L.
100–647, TAMRA’88, for returns the
due date for which occurs (without
extensions) after December 31,
1988. This section provides a
penalty for failure to disclose a
treaty-based return position.
-
Reporting/Filing Requirement.
-
IRC section 6712 enforces IRC
section 6114. IRC section 6114
generally requires that if a
taxpayer takes a position that
any treaty of the U.S.
overrules or modifies any
provision of the IRC, the
taxpayer must disclose the
position.
-
A
taxpayer meets the disclosure
requirement by attaching Form
8833 or a statement to the
appropriate tax return in the
format outlined in Treas. Reg.
301.6114–1(d) with taxpayer’s
name, TIN or EIN, address,
name and address of payor of
income, a statement of
citizenship or residency, and
a statement of facts regarding
each separate position taken.
-
NOTE: A
taxpayer may be able to
aggregate certain similar
types of income as a single
payment or income item for
disclosure purposes. See
Treas. Reg.
301.6114–1(d)(4)(i) for
guidance on rules for
aggregating separate payments
or income items.
20.1.9.17.1 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Assertion
-
The penalty is asserted when the
examiner determines that the
taxpayer failed in a material
way to disclose a treaty based
return position under IRC
section 6114.
20.1.9.17.2 (08-07-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
The penalty is $1,000 for each
separate treaty-based position
taken and not properly
disclosed, in the case of an
individual taxpayer. For a C
corporation, the penalty is
$10,000 for each separate
failure to disclose a
treaty-based position.
20.1.9.17.3 (08-07-1998)
Waiver Criteria
-
Treas. Reg. 301.6712–1(b)
provides the Director,
Compliance, the Area Director,
or the Director of the Service
Center with the authority to
waive, in whole or in part, the
penalty imposed under IRC
section 6712 if the taxpayer’s
failure to disclose the required
information is not due to
willful neglect.
-
An affirmative showing of lack
of willful neglect must be made
in the form of a written
statement setting forth all the
facts alleged to show lack of
willful neglect and must contain
a declaration by the taxpayer
that the statement is made under
penalties of perjury.
|
20.1.10.1 (08-12-1998)
Overview
-
This section of the consolidated
penalty IRM discusses the
miscellaneous penalties not
included in the other chapters.
20.1.10.1.1 (08-12-1998)
Common Features
-
In general, each penalty
discussed in this chapter is
unique and will stand alone
unless otherwise indicated.
Exceptions and additional
information are noted in the
discussions of the specific
penalties. However, some general
procedures will apply.
-
Statute of
Limitations.Penalties
that are
notconsidered
taxesgenerally
have no
statute of limitationfor
assessment. For penalties
subject to deficiency procedures
(generally, income taxes) or
non-deficiency procedures
(generally, employment or excise
tax) the limitation for
assessment is three years after
the return is due or filed,
whichever is later. See IRM
20.1.4 for a discussion of
deficiency versus non-deficiency
procedures.
-
Reasonable Cause.Determination
as to whether or not reasonable
cause exists must be based on a
careful consideration of the
facts and circumstances of each
case prior to the assertion of a
penalty. Examiners should
consider any reason a taxpayer
provides in conjunction with the
guidelines, principles and
evaluating factors identified in
the Penalty Relief Chapter. See
IRM 20.1.3, Penalty Relief, as
well as the applicable IRC
section and Treas. Regs.
relating to the specific
penalty.
-
Abatements.Information
on penalty abatements and
penalty reason codes (PRC) are
discussed in IRM 20.1.1.
-
Penalty
Transaction Codes.See
Exhibit 20.1–5 for a list of
penalty transaction codes.
-
Penalty Reference
Numbers.See
Exhibit 20.1–6 and 20.1–7 for a
list of penalty reference
numbers.
20.1.10.1.2 (08-12-1998)
Who Asserts/
Assesses
-
A service center or compliance
function may determine that a
penalty should be imposed.
-
At a service center the
penalty may generate
automatically, or
-
compliance functions
consider the penalty during
an examination or during
personal contact with the
taxpayer.
-
Reference numbers are used to
assess non tax return related
penalties (conduct or
information returns).
-
Five hundred (500) series
referenced numbers are
generally generated as a
result of computer matching
programs and used to
identify the failure.
-
Six hundred (600) series
reference numbers are
generally used to assess
penalties as the result of
an examination or other
compliance activity.
-
See Exhibit 20.1.1–6 and
20.1.1–7 for a complete list
of current reference
numbers.
20.1.10.2 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6166(g)(3)
-
IRC section 6166, Extension of
Time for Payment of Estate Tax
Where Estate Consists Largely of
Interest in Closely Held Business,
under certain circumstances
provides for the deferral of tax
and/or installment payment plan
for tax imposed by IRC section
2001.
-
IRC section 6166(g)(3), Failure to
Make Payment of Principal or
Interest, provides that if any
payment payable under IRC section
6166(a) is not paid when due but
is paid within 6 months of the due
date, there is imposed a penalty
in an amount equal to 5 percent of
the amount of the payment
multiplied by the number of months
(or fractions thereof) after the
due date and before payment is
made.
-
The estate tax installment
agreement is monitored in the
Service Center Accounting Branch.
The service center procedures for
assessment/abatement will be the
primary focus under this penalty
section.
20.1.10.2.1 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
During the four year principal
deferral (or shorter period if
elected by the executor), the
Estate is billed for interest
only.
-
If the taxpayer fails to make
the installment (interest)
payment, CP–191, Notification to
Service Center Accounting to
update the installment billing
clerks file, will not generate.
A manual review of the payment
pending file will be necessary
45 days after the installment
due date. If the review shows an
unpaid installment, research:
-
IDRS for misapplied payment,
and
-
Form 4768, Application for
Extension of Time to File
U.S. Estate Tax Return
and/or Pay Estate Tax.
-
If no payment or extension is
located:
-
Compute the Late Installment
(LI) Penalty on the unpaid
installment (interest) at 5%
per month (or fraction
thereof) from the
installment due date to the
date of Notice and Demand.
-
Input TC 240 for LI Penalty
on IDRS.
-
Compute interest on the
unpaid installment
(interest) from the
installment due date to the
date of Notice and Demand.
-
Input TC 340 for interest on
IDRS.
-
Prepare and issue Form 6335,
Unit Ledger Card, for the
unpaid installment,
including accrued penalty
and interest.
-
Suspense for 45 days.
-
If after 90 days, no response is
received from Service Center
Collection Branch (SCCB),
contact them to determine status
of account.
20.1.10.2.2 (08-12-1998)
Assessment
-
If the taxpayer fails to make
the installment (principal and
interest) payment, a manual
review of the payment pending
file will be necessary 45 days
after the installment date.
-
Compute Late Installment
(LI) penalty on the unpaid
installment (principal and
interest) at 5% per month
(or fraction thereof) from
the installment due date to
the date of Notice and
Demand. Input TC 240 for LI
Penalty on IDRS.
-
Compute Failure to Pay (FTP)
Penalty on the principal
portion of the installment
from the installment due
date to the date of Notice
and Demand. Input TC 270 for
FTP penalty on IDRS.
-
Compute interest (at the
existing rate) on the unpaid
installment (principal and
interest) from the
installment due date to the
date of Notice and Demand.
Input TC 340 for interest on
IDRS.
-
Use Hold Codes, Priority Codes,
Posting Delay Codes and Penalty
Reasons Codes as applicable. See
IRM 3.15.60 and Document 6209
for additional information
regarding these codes and
indicators.
-
Prepare and issue "Certified
Letter" (return receipt
requested) for the unpaid
installment, accrued penalty and
interest. Suspense for 45 days.
-
If the payment is not received
within 45 days of the Certified
Letter, see IRM 3.17.243.
20.1.10.2.3 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Relief
-
No penalty relief provisions,
including reasonable cause,
exist. It should be noted,
however, that prior to the due
date of the payment, the estate
may seek an extension of the
time for payment under IRC
section 6161, Extension of Time
for Paying Tax.
20.1.10.3 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6652(a)
-
Reserved. See LEM 20.1.10.3.
20.1.10.3.1 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6652(j)
-
IRC section 6652(j) provides a
penalty of $100 per failure to
provide the certification as
required by IRC section
142(d)(7).
-
Form 8703, Annual
Certification by Operator
Qualified Residential Rental
Project is required to be
filed by March 31 after the
close of the calendar year
for which the certification
is made.
-
Form 8610, Annual Low-Income
Housing Credit Agencies
Report, is required to be
filed by February 28 of the
year following the calendar
year for which an allocation
of credit is made.
-
The Service does not apply the
penalty when the failure to
timely file Form 8703 or Form
8610 is due to reasonable cause
and not willful neglect.
-
The penalty is subject to
deficiency procedures.
-
Effective January 1, 1997,
procedures for
assessment/abatement will be in
IRM 3.11.25.
-
Currently, Philadelphia Service
Center processes these forms in
a special processing unit.
20.1.10.3.2 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6652(k)
20.1.10.3.3 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6652(l)
20.1.10.4 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6653
-
IRC section 6653, Failure to Pay
Stamp is administered by the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms.
20.1.10.5 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6657
-
Generally, this penalty will be
assessed by the Service Center
using penalty transaction codes.
-
TC
280—Manual assessment of a bad
check penalty, or
-
TC
286—Computer generated
assessment of a bad check
penalty initiated by the
posting of any one of the
following Transaction Codes:
611, 621, 741, 651, 661, 671,
681, 691 and 721.
-
TC
287 is computer generated
which reverses the Transaction
Code 280 or 286 if the status
is 06 and the module balance
is debit and net 28X amount
equals the module balance.
- A
CP 587 notice will be sent to the
taxpayer informing them of the
dishonored check or money order
and any applicable penalty and
interest assessed.
20.1.10.5.1 (08-12-1998)
Bad Check Penalty
-
IRC section 6657 provides for
the assertion of a penalty when
a taxpayer’s check or money
order is dishonored. For checks
or money orders that were
dishonored:
-
On or before November 10,
1988, a penalty in an amount
equal to:
(1) 1% the amount of the
check, or
(2) if the amount of the
dishonored check/money order
was $500 or less; then the
penalty was $5 or the amount
of the check/money order
whichever was less.
-
After November 10, 1988, the
Technical Corrections Act of
1988 increased the amount of
the penalty to:
(1) 2% of the amount of the
check, or
(2) if the amount of the
dishonored check/money order
if $750 or less; then the
penalty is $15.00 or the
amount of the check/money
order, whichever is less.
20.1.10.5.2 (08-12-1998)
Assessment
-
A dishonored check/money order
is identified on IDRS when a
payment/deposit is reversed.
-
For example, check/money
order received with a return
is identified as a TC 610.
If the check/money order
received with the return,
was dishonored when
presented to a bank, it
would be identified on IDRS
as a TC 611.
-
When a payment/deposit
received by the Service is
dishonored, the dishonored
payment will be reversed
using one of the following:
TC 611, 621, 641, 651, 661,
671, 681, 691, 721.
-
The penalty associated with
the dishonored check/money
order will be identified on
IDRS as a TC 280 or TC 286.
20.1.10.5.3 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Relief
-
The taxpayer may request penalty
abatement by providing a reason
why the check/money order was
dishonored. Review the request
for abatement, bank letter or
other information to determine
if the penalty should be abated
(see 20.1.1.3, Penalty Relief).
-
When it is determined that the
penalty should be abated:
-
Input a TC 281 for the
amount of the penalty
previously assessed
-
Indicate the reason for the
penalty abatement in the
adjustment remarks area.
-
Use reason codes, penalty
reason codes, hold codes,
priority codes, or posting
delay codes as required.
-
Notify the taxpayer that the
penalty has been abated
(letter 608C or by
telephone).
-
When it is determined that the
penalty should not be abated:
-
Provide the taxpayer with a
written explanation (854C or
equivalent)
-
Input TC 290 .00, BK 98/99,
RC 62.
20.1.10.5.3.1 (08-12-1998)
Reasonable Cause
-
In
addition to the reasons
discussed in IRM 20.1.1.3, the
following should be accepted
as reasonable cause for
dishonored checks.
-
The taxpayer furnished
evidence that their bank
account contained
sufficient funds at the
time the check was
submitted, but due to an
error the check/money
order was dishonored in
error. In this situation,
the bank should provide a
letter of explanation.
-
A check was not honored
because of the death of
the taxpayer after the
date the check was issued.
-
Payment of a check was
stopped on the advice or
recommendation of an
employee of the Service.
-
No penalty will be
assessed on third party
checks involving cash
register seized property.
-
See LEM 20.1.10.
20.1.10.6 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6674
-
IRC section 6674 provides for a
penalty for a Willful Failure to
Furnish (IRC section 6051 or
6053(b)) or for Willfully
Furnishing a False or Fraudulent
Statement (31.6051–1 or 31.6053–2)
to an employee.
-
IRC section 6051, Receipts for
Employees
-
IRC section 6053(b),
Statements Furnished by
Employers
20.1.10.6.1 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
The penalty is $50 for each
willful failure to provide or
furnishing a false or fraudulent
statement.
20.1.10.6.2 (08-12-1998)
Assertion
-
When an indication of willful
failure is discovered, the
investigating Compliance office
will suspend the inquiry and
report findings to the Criminal
Investigation function.
-
Examination will assert the
civil penalty.
20.1.10.6.3 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Relief
-
Reasonable cause provisions do
not apply to IRC section 6674.
See IRM 20.1.1.3.
20.1.10.7 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6675
-
IRC section 6675 provides for a
penalty if an excessive claim is
filed for certain federal excise
taxes.
-
IRC section 6420—gasoline used
on farms;
-
IRC section 6421—gasoline used
for certain nonhighway
purposes; and
-
IRC section 6427—fuels not
used for taxable purposes.
20.1.10.7.1 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
The penalty is an amount equal
to the greater of:
-
Two times the excessive
amount; or
-
$10.
-
The penalty
does not applyto
excessive credit taken for such
taxes on an income tax return.
-
The penalty
may applyto
excessive payment on the claim.
20.1.10.7.2 (08-12-1998)
Reserved
20.1.10.7.3 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Relief
-
Reasonable cause does apply. See
IRM 20.1.1.3.
20.1.10.8 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6697
-
IRC section 6697 provides for a
penalty to be imposed on a
regulated investment company or a
real estate investment trust which
uses the deficiency dividend
procedure of IRC section 860 to
retain its qualified status.
-
Prior to 1987, this penalty
applied to a real estate
investment trust.
20.1.10.8.1 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
The amount of the penalty is
equal to the interest charge
paid by the trust on the
deficiency dividend.
-
The penalty may not exceed 50%
of the deficiency dividend
deduction allowed by IRC section
860(a).
20.1.10.8.2 (08-12-1998)
Assertion
-
The penalty may be assessed and
collected without the normal
deficiency procedure.
-
For tax years beginning after
1986, the penalty does not apply
to a real estate investment
trust (REIT) that uses the
deficiency dividend procedure to
retain its qualified status.
20.1.10.8.3 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Relief
-
Reasonable cause does not apply.
See IRM 20.1.3.
20.1.10.9 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6702
-
IRC section 6702 provides for an
immediate assessment of a $500
civil penalty against individuals
who file frivolous income tax
returns or frivolous amended
income tax returns. The penalty is
not based on tax liability. There
does not need to be an
underpayment of tax or
understatement of liability in
order for the penalty to be
imposed in addition to any other
penalty. The intent of the law is
to stop the flow of returns,
amended returns, or documents
which purport to be returns, that
contain altered line items or
claim clearly unallowable
deductions or credits based on a
frivolous position.
-
The penalty can be asserted on a
frivolous Form 1040, Form 1040X
Amended Return, Form 843, Claim
and others which:
-
Do
not contain sufficient
information to judge the
correctness of the tax, or
-
Contain information that on
its face indicates the
self-assessment is incorrect,
and
-
The conduct referred to in (a)
or (b) is due to a position
which is frivolous or a desire
to delay or impede the
administration of the tax
laws.
-
Some of the schemes which may
cause the assertion of the penalty
are:
-
Unallowable deductions such as
the gold standard, discounted
Federal Reserve Notes and War
tax;
-
Wages are not income;
-
Constitutional claims (i.e.,
Fourth, Fifth and Sixteenth
amendments);
-
Invalid returns; and
-
Nonprocessable returns.
-
The frivolous return penalty is
not applied against partnerships,
corporations or estates.
-
Statute of Limitations. A
frivolous return:
-
Does not
constitute a valid return when
the Service is unable to
process the return, therefore,
the IRC section 6702 penalty
may be assessed at any time.
-
Does
constitute a valid return when
the Service is able to process
the return. Therefore, the IRC
section 6702 penalty must be
assessed within 3 years after
the return was filed.
-
See Exhibit 20.1.1–6, for the
applicable penalty reference
numbers.
20.1.10.9.1 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
The civil penalty is $500 per
frivolous document.
-
A taxpayer can have multiple
penalties. However, for a joint
return, only one $500 penalty is
assessed against the husband and
wife, per frivolous document.
-
See LEM 20.1.10.
20.1.10.9.2 (08-12-1998)
Assertion
-
Generally, the service center
identifies frivolous returns and
assesses the penalty.
-
If the field receives a return
that warrants a frivolous return
penalty, the employee should
indicate this on a Form 3198,
Special Handling Notice,
attached to the original return.
-
A Form 8278, Computation and
Assessment of Miscellaneous
Penalties, will be completed and
used for assessment unless the
penalty is related to a joint
return. The Non-Master File
Assessment Voucher, Form 5734,
will be used for the joint
assessment of the penalty. See
IRM Part 5.1.1, Collection for
further information.
20.1.10.9.3 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Relief
-
Taxpayers seeking judicial
review of the imposition of the
penalty must first pay the
entire penalty. A Letter of
Disallowance is sent to the
taxpayer and the taxpayer can
file suit contesting this
penalty in the district court or
U.S. Court of Federal Claims.
20.1.10.10 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6705
-
IRC section 6705 provides a $500
penalty for Failure by Broker to
Provide Notice to Payors that a
payee is subject to backup
withholding.
-
Under IRC section 3406(d)(2)(B), a
broker who acquires a readily
tradable instrument for a payee
(customer) must notify the payor
of such instrument within 15 days
of the acquisition that the payee
is subject to backup withholding
if either of the following
conditions exist:
-
The payee fails to furnish the
TIN to the broker.
-
The IRS notifies the broker
that the TIN is incorrect.
-
The payee has not provided the
broker with a certification
that the payee is not subject
to backup withholding, or
-
The IRS has notified the
broker before the acquisition
that the payee is subject to
backup withholding.
-
Any broker who intentionally fails
to provide the required notice is
subject to the penalty of $500 for
each such failure.
-
The penalty applies to payments
made after 1983.
20.1.10.10.1 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
The penalty is computed at $500
per failure by the broker to
provide the notice to the payor.
20.1.10.10.2 (08-12-1998)
Assertion
-
Compliance employees request the
assessment of the penalty using
Form 8278.
-
The penalty is assessed using
penalty reference number 632.
20.1.10.10.3 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Relief
-
Reasonable cause does not apply.
See Exhibit 20.1.10–1.
20.1.10.11 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6706(a)
-
IRC section 6706(a) provides for a
penalty of $50 for Failure to Show
Information on Debt Instrument.
- In
the case of any debt instrument
having original issue discount,
the following information must be
shown on the Debt Instrument,
-
Amount of the original issue
discount, and
-
The issue date.
-
Statutory notice of deficiency
procedures do not apply to this
penalty.
20.1.10.11.1 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
In the case of any debt
instrument having original issue
discount that does not contain
the required information, a
penalty of $50 per failure to
show information on a debt
instrument will be assessed.
|
20.1.10.11
IRC section 6706(a)
20.1.10.11.1
Penalty Computation
20.1.10.11.1.1 (08-12-1998)
Assertion
-
This penalty is asserted by
Compliance.
20.1.10.11.1.2 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Relief
-
Reasonable cause does apply.
See IRM 20.1.1.3.
20.1.10.11.2 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6706(b)
-
IRC section 6706(b) provides for
a penalty of 1% of the aggregate
issue price of such issue, not
to exceed $50,000 for Failure to
Furnish Form 8281, Information
Return for Publicly Offered
Original Issue Discount
Instruments.
-
An issuer of a publicly offered
debt instrument (obligation)
having Original Issue Discount (OID),
such as a bond, debenture, or
note, must file Form 8281.
-
Form 8281 must be filed within
30 days of the date of issuance
of an OID instrument.
-
A separate Form 8281 must be
filed for each issue.
-
Statutory notice of deficiency
procedures do not apply to this
penalty.
20.1.10.11.2.1 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
A
penalty of 1% of the aggregate
issue price of a publicly
offered original discount
instrument, not to exceed
$50,000 for the failure to
notify the Service within the
time specified will be
assessed.
20.1.10.11.2.2 (08-12-1998)
Assertion
-
The Multi-Functional
Compliance Team (MFCT) in
Detroit Data Center (DDC) has
primary responsibility for
this program.
20.1.10.11.2.3 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Relief
-
Reasonable cause does apply.
See IRM 20.1.3.
20.1.10.12 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6707
-
Failure to register a tax shelter:
-
IRC section 6111(a) defines
those people required to
register a tax shelter and the
time for the required
registration.
-
IRC section 6707(a) provides a
penalty for those people who
fail to register or fail to
register timely.
-
Form 8264, Application for
Registration of a Tax Shelter,
is used for this purpose.
-
Failure to furnish identifying
number:
-
IRC section 6111(b)(1) defines
the requirements to furnish a
tax shelter identification
number to an authorized person
upon request.
-
IRC section 6707(b)(1)
provides a penalty for each
failure to do so.
-
Failure to include an identifying
number on a return:
-
IRC section 6111(b)(2) defines
the requirement to include the
identification number on any
return as required.
-
IRC section 6707(b)(2)
provides a penalty for each
failure to supply the number
as required.
-
The penalty applies to interests
in tax shelters which are first
offered for sale after August 31,
1984.
20.1.10.12.1 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
After 10/22/86:
-
IRC section 6707(a) provides
a penalty of 1 percent of
the aggregate amount
invested in the tax shelter
or $500, whichever is
greater, for the failure to
register a tax shelter.
-
IRC section 6707(b)(1)
provides a penalty of $100
for each failure to furnish
an identifying number as
required.
-
IRC section 6707(b)(2)
provides a $250 penalty for
each failure to include an
identifying number on a
return.
-
Prior to 10/23/86:
-
For failure to register a
tax shelter shall be an
amount to the greater of
$500 or the lesser of (i) 1
percent of the aggregate
amount invested in such
shelter, or (ii) $10,000.
-
IRC section 6707(b)(1)
provides a penalty of $100
for each failure to furnish
an identifying number as
required.
-
IRC section 6707(b)(2)
provides a $50 penalty for
each failure to include an
identifying number on a
return.
20.1.10.12.2 (08-12-1998)
Assertion
-
These penalties are asserted by
Examination function.
20.1.10.12.3 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Relief
-
The reasonable cause exception
applies to the penalties in IRC
section 6707 except the penalty
under section 6707(b)(1). See
IRM 20.1.1.3 for a discussion of
reasonable cause.
20.1.10.13 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6708
-
The requirement to maintain a list
of investors in potentially
abusive tax shelters is defined in
IRC section 6112. IRC section 6708
provides a penalty for each
investor not included on the list.
-
The penalty applies to tax
shelters which are first offered
for sale after August 31, 1984.
-
August 31, 1984 to October 22,
1986—$50,000 maximum.
-
After October 22,
1986—$100,000 maximum.
20.1.10.13.1 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
IRC section 6708 provides a
penalty of $50 for each investor
not included on the list with a
maximum penalty of $100,000
after October 22, 1986. Prior to
October 23, 1986, maximum
penalty of $50,000.
20.1.10.13.2 (08-12-1998)
Assertion
-
These penalties are asserted by
Examination function.
20.1.10.13.3 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Relief
-
The penalty is not asserted if
there is reasonable cause and
the failure was not due to
willful neglect. See IRM
20.1.1.3 for a discussion of
reasonable cause.
20.1.10.14 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6709(c)
-
IRC section 6709(c) provides for a
penalty of $200 for Failure to
File a report with respect to any
mortgage credit certificates
required by IRC section 25(g).
-
Any person (lender) who makes a
loan that is a certified
indebtedness amount on any
Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC)
must provide IRS with information
regarding the issuance of MCCs
under IRC section 25.
-
Form 8329 is due by January 31
following the close of the
calendar year in which the lender
made certified indebtedness loans.
-
Each issuer (states and political
subdivisions) of MCCs are to
provide IRS with information
required by IRC section 25 and
Treas. Reg.
1.25–8T(b).
-
Form 8330 must be filed on a
quarterly basis beginning with the
quarter in which the election was
made.
20.1.10.14.1 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Computation
20.1.10.14.2 (08-12-1998)
Assertion
-
This penalty is asserted by
Compliance.
20.1.10.14.3 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Relief
-
Reasonable cause does apply. See
IRM 20.1.1.3.
20.1.10.15 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 6715
-
IRC section 4081 imposes a tax on
certain removals, entries, or
sales of diesel fuel. Generally,
diesel fuel that is dyed pursuant
to the regulations under IRC
section 4082 is exempt from tax.
-
Effective January 1, 1994, IRC
section 6715 imposes an assessable
penalty on the misuse of dyed
fuel. Generally, misuse occurs
when a person sells, holds for
sale, uses, or holds for use, dyed
fuel for a taxable use. A typical
taxable use is use as a fuel in a
registered diesel-powered highway
vehicle. The IRC section 6715
penalty also applies if a person
wilfully alters, or attempts to
alter, the strength or composition
of the dye in dyed fuel.
20.1.10.15.1 (08-12-1998)
Improper Sale of Dyed Fuel
-
If any dyed fuel is sold or held
for sale by any person for any
use that such person knows or
has reason to know is not a
nontaxable use of such fuel,
then such person shall pay an
IRC section 6715 penalty in
addition to the tax (if any).
-
"Dyed fuel" means any dyed
diesel fuel, whether or not the
fuel was dyed pursuant to IRC
section 4082.
-
"Nontaxable use" has the meaning
given to the term by IRC section
4082(b).
20.1.10.15.1.1 (08-12-1998)
Improper Use of Dyed Fuel
-
If
any dyed fuel is held for use
or used by any person for a
use other than a nontaxable
use and such person knew, or
had reason to know, that such
fuel was so dyed, then such
person shall pay an IRC
section 6715 penalty in
addition to the tax (if any).
-
"Dyed fuel" means any dyed
diesel fuel, whether or not
the fuel was dyed pursuant to
IRC section 4082.
-
"Nontaxable use" has the
meaning given to the term by
IRC section 4082(b).
20.1.10.15.1.2 (08-12-1998)
Willful Alteration of Dye
Concentration
-
If
any person willfully alters,
or attempts to alter, the
strength or composition of any
dye or marking done pursuant
to IRC section 4082 in any
dyed fuel, then such person
shall pay a penalty in
addition to the tax (if any).
-
This penalty does not apply in
the following cases:
-
Diesel fuel that is dyed
pursuant to the
regulations under IRC
section 4082 is blended
with any undyed liquid and
the resulting product
satisfies the dyeing
requirements of the
regulations under IRC
section 4082.
-
Diesel fuel that is dyed
pursuant to the
regulations under IRC
section 4082 is blended
with any other liquid
(other than diesel fuel)
that contains the type and
amount of dye required for
diesel fuel dyed in
accordance with the
regulations under IRC
section 4082.
-
Diesel fuel that is not
dyed pursuant to the
regulations under IRC
section 4082 is blended
with diesel fuel that is
dyed pursuant to IRC
section 4082 and the
blending occurs as part of
nontaxable use.
20.1.10.15.2 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
For the first violation, the
amount of the penalty on each
act is the greater of—
-
$1,000, or
-
$10 for each gallon of the
dyed fuel involved.
-
For additional violations, the
amount in (1)(a) is determined
by multiplying $1,000 times the
number of prior penalties
imposed by IRC section 6715 on
such person (or a related person
or any predecessor of such
person or related person).
-
Thus, for example, if 50 gallons
of dyed fuel is involved in a
person’s first violation, the
penalty would be $1,000 because
that amount is greater than 50 X
$10. If 150 gallons of dyed fuel
is involved in that person’s
second violation, the penalty
would be $2,000 because that
amount ($1,000 X 2 violations)
is greater than 150 X $10.
-
If a penalty is imposed under
IRC section 6715 on any business
entity, each officer, employee,
or agent of such entity who
willfully participated in any
act giving rise to such penalty
is jointly and severally liable
with such entity for such
penalty.
20.1.10.15.3 (08-12-1998)
Assessment
-
This penalty is assessed by Area
Office Examination using Form
5734, Non Master File Assessment
Voucher or Form 2859, Request
for Quick or Prompt Assessment.
-
Use penalty Reference Number
(PRN) 656 on forms requiring a
PRN.
20.1.10.15.4 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Relief
-
This is no reasonable cause
exception to this penalty.
20.1.10.16 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 7268
-
IRC section 7268, Possession with
Intent to Sell in Fraud of Law or
to Evade Tax, is administered by
the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms. See LEM 20.1.10.
20.1.10.17 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 7270
-
IRC 7270, Insurance Penalties,
provides for penalties for the
issuance of insurance policies by
foreign insurers with the intent
to evade tax.
20.1.10.18 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 7271
-
IRC section 7271, Penalties for
Offenses Relating to Stamps, is
administered by the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. See
LEM 20.1.10.
20.1.10.19 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 7272
-
IRC section 7272 relates to
penalties for failure to register
as required by subtitle E,
Alcohol, Tobacco and certain other
excise taxes.
20.1.10.20 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 7273
-
IRC section 7273, Penalties for
Offenses Relating to Special
Taxes, is administered by the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms. See LEM 20.1.10.
20.1.10.21 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 7275
-
IRC section 7275, Penalties for
Offenses Relating to Airline
Tickets and Advertising, provides
that any person who violates the
provisions of this section is
guilty of a misdemeanor for each
violation and upon conviction
shall be fined not more than $100.
20.1.10.22 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 7304
-
IRC section 7304, Penalty for
Fraudulently Claiming Drawback, is
administered by the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. See
LEM 20.1.10.
20.1.10.23 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 7342
-
IRC section 7342 provides for a
Penalty for Refusal to Permit
Entry or Examination against a
person who refuses to admit any
officer or employee of the
Treasury Department or refuses to
permit him to examine such article
or articles.
20.1.10.23.1 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Computation
-
For each refusal to permit entry
or examination:
-
$500 for each refusal, or
-
$1000 for each refusal
related to a place where
taxable fuel is stored or
produced (see Section
4083(c)(3)).
20.1.10.23.2 (08-12-1998)
Assertion
-
This penalty is asserted by
Compliance using Reference
Number 655 on any document used
to assess/assert this penalty.
20.1.10.23.3 (08-12-1998)
Penalty Relief
-
There is no reasonable cause
exception to this penalty.
-
If the taxpayer disagrees with
the penalty, two options are
available:
-
Make an administrative
appeal to the Exam group
manager at the time the
violation is found or
-
Pay the penalty and file a
timely Form 843 claim for
refund.
-
If the claim is disallowed, the
taxpayer can file suit in either
US District Court or US Court of
Federal Claims per IRC 6532.
-
If the penalty was erroneously
assessed, it must be abated.
20.1.10.24 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 7519
-
IRC section 7519(f)(4) provides
for a penalty for Failure to Pay
on the Date Prescribed if a
partnership or S corporation fails
to comply with the required
payment rules.
20.1.10.24.1 (08-12-1998)
IRC section 7519(f)(4)(a)
-
IRC section 7519(f)(4)(a)
provides for a ten percent
underpayment penalty on Section
444 election payment amounts
unpaid on or before the payment
due date, May 15.
-
The Section 444 ten percent
election penalty is subject to
reasonable cause (effective
7/97).
-
See the AIMS Handbook, BMF and
NMF Adjustments, regarding
Section 444 elections.
20.1.10.24.2 (08-12-1998)
Assessment
-
For tax returns filed after
December 31, 1991, TC 246,
reference code 684 will be
computer-generated to assess the
ten percent election penalty
when Form 8752 posts to a tax
module (MFT 15) which is not
fully paid by May 15.
-
The ten percent election penalty
may be manually assessed, if
applicable and not
computer-generated at the time
the return posted by inputting
TC 290 with reference code 684
for the correct penalty amount
to MFT 15. (The manual penalty
assessment will result in TC 240
with reference code 684 posting
to master file MFT 15.)
-
The ten percent election penalty
may be manually abated by
inputting TC 290 with reference
code 684 for the correct
NEGATIVE amount to MFT 15. (The
manual penalty abatement will
result in TC 241 with reference
code 684 posting to master file
MFT 15.)
Exhibit 20.1.10.24-1
(08-12-1998)
Penalty Relief—Application
Chart
Penalty Relief Chart
|
IRC Section |
Type of Penalty |
Reasonable Cause Relief |
Other Relief |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6166(g)(3) |
Failure to Make Payment of
Principal or Interest
Payment of Estate Tax |
No |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6652(a)(2) |
Failure to File Certain
Information Returns with
Respect to Certain Payments
Aggregating less than $10 |
N/a |
N/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6652(j) |
Failure to File
Certification with Respect
to Certain Residential
Rental Projects |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6652(k) |
Reserved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6652(l) |
Reserved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6653 |
Failure to Pay Stamp Tax
(AT&F) |
N/a |
N/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6657 |
Bad Check |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6674 |
Fraudulent Statement or
Failure to Furnish Statement
to Employee |
No |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6675 |
Excessive Claims with
Respect to the Use of
Certain Fuels |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6697 |
Assessable Penalties with
Respect to Liability for Tax
of Regulated Investment
Companies |
No |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6702 |
Frivolous Income Tax Return |
No |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6705 |
Failure by Broker to Provide
Notice to Payors |
No |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6706(a) |
Failure to Show Information
on Debt Instrument |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6706(b) |
Failure to Furnish
Information to Secretary |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6707 |
Reserved |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6707(b)(1) |
Failure to Furnish Tax
Shelter ID # |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6708 |
Reserved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6709(c) |
Penalties with Respect to
Mortgage Credit Certificates |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6715 |
Dyed Fuel Sold for Use or
Used in Taxable Use |
No |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7268 |
Reserved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7271 |
Reserved |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7272 |
Penalties for Failure to
Register as Required by
Subtitle E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7273 |
Reserved |
No |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7275 |
Penalties for Offenses
Relating to Airline Tickets
and Advertising |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7304 |
Reserved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7342 |
Penalty for Refusal to
Permit Entry or Examination |
No |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7519(f)(4) |
Required Payments for
Entities Electing Not to
Have Required Taxable Year. |
Yes |
No |
|
|