6323 - Protection of Property

Home Services FAQ Site Map Contact Us


Articles by Alvin Brown
Tax Preparation
Offer In Compromise
State Offers in Compromise
Levy
IRS Tax Liens
IRS Tax Liens - continued
IRS Tax Liens - continued 2
Levy - continued
Audit Techniques Guide
Congressional Contacts
Criminal Investigation
D.O.J Criminal Tax Manual
Tax Litigation
Penalty
Installment Agreements
Statute of Limitations
Frivolous Tax Argument
Interest Abatement
IRS Misconduct
IRS Abuses
Tax Fraud
Fraud Statutes
Bankruptcy
Tax Reform Legislation
Tax Shelters
Tax Court
Trust Fund Penalty
Legislation
Innocent Spouse Relief
Important Links


Liens 

Additional Information:

 

6323 - Alabama
6323 - Alabama2
6323 - Alaska
6323 - Alaska2
6323 - Allocation of Liens
6323 - Arizona
6323 - Arkansas
6323 - Arkansas2
6323 - Assignment of Funds p1
6323 - Assignment of Funds p2
6323 - Assignment of Funds p3
6323 - Assignment of Funds p4
6323 - Bankruptcy p1
6323 - Bona Fide Purchaser for Value p1
6323 - Bona Fide Purchaser for Value p2
6323 - Bona Fide Purchaser for Value p3
6323 - Bona Fide Purchaser for Value p4
6323 - California
6323 - California2 p1
6323 - California2 p2
6323 - Claims After Death
6323 - Clerk's Error
6323 - Colorado
6323 - Condemnation Proceedings
6323 - Conflicts of Law p1
6323 - Conflicts of Law p2
6323 - Conflicts of Law p3
6323 - Connecticut
6323 - Consideration
6323 - Constructive Trust
6323 - Contract Assignment p1
6323 - Contract Assignment p2
6323 - Conveyance by Taxpayer p1
6323 - Conveyance by Taxpayer p2
6323 - Copyright Act
6323 - Debenture Holders
6323 - Decedent
6323 - Deeds of Trust
6323 - Delaware
6323 - Disclosure of Lien
6323 - Distribution of Proceeds
6323 - District of Columbia
6323 - District of Columbia2
6323 - District Where Filed p1
6323 - District Where Filed p2
6323 - Employee's Claims
6323 - Equitable or Secret Lien
6323 - Equitable Principles
6323 - Escrow
6323 - Escrow2
6323 - Estate Claims
6323 - Estoppel p1
6323 - Estoppel p2
6323 - Extension
6323 - Fact-Finding p1
6323 - Fact-Finding p2
6323 - Fact-Finding p3
6323 - Fact-Finding p4
6323 - Fact-Finding p5
6323 - Fact-Finding p6
6323 - Fire Insurance Proceeds p1
6323 - Fire Insurance Proceeds p2
6323 - Florida
6323 - Florida2
6323 - Form of Notice
6323 - Garnishment
6323 - Georgia
6323 - Hawaii
6323 - Idaho
6323 - Illinois
6323 - Illinois2
6323 - Indiana
6323 - Indiana2
6323 - Inherited Property p1
6323 - Inherited Property p2
6323 - Interest on Mortgage
6323 - Interpleader p1
6323 - Interpleader p2
6323 - Interpleader p3
6323 - Interpleader p4
6323 - Interpleader p5
6323 - Interpleader p6
6323 - Interpleader p7
6323 - Interpleader2 p1
6323 - Interpleader2 p2
6323 - Iowa
6323 - Iowa2
6323 - Judgment Creditor p1
6323 - Judicial Sale
6323 - Jurisdiction p1
6323 - Jurisdiction p2
6323 - Jurisdiction p3
6323 - Kentucky
6323 - Kentucky2
6323 - Louisiana
6323 - Maritime Liens
6323 - Marshalling of Assets
6323 - Maryland
6323 - Maryland2
6323 - Massachusetts
6323 - Michigan p1
6323 - Michigan P2
6323 - Michigan2
6323 - Minnesota
6323 - Mississippi
6323 - Mississippi2
6323 - Missouri
6323 - Montana
6323 - Money Forfeited to State
6323 - Mortgage
6323 - Name Changed
6323 - Nebraska
6323 - New Hampshire
6323 - New Hampshire2
6323 - New Jersey
6323 - New York p1
6323 - New York p2
6323 - New York p3
6323 - New York2
6323 - North Carolina
6323 - North Carolina2
6323 - North Dakota
6323 - Tax Lien Not Filed
6323 - Notice or Knowledge of Lien p1
6323 - Notice or Knowledge of Lien p2
6323 - Notice or Knowledge of Lien p3
6323 - Obligatory Disbursement Agreement
6323 - Ohio
6323 - Ohio2
6323 - Oklahoma
6323 - Oklahoma2
6323 - Oregon
6323 - Oregon2
6323 - Partners and Partnerships
6323 - Pennsylvania p1
6323 - Pennsylvania p2
6323 - Pennsylvania2 p1
6323 - Pennsylvania2 p2
6323 - Personal Property of Another
6323 - Personality p1
6323 - Personality p2
6323 - Possessory Liens
6323 - Prior Law p1
6323 - Prior Lien of Attorney
6323 - Prior Lien of U.S. p1
6323 - Prior Lien of U.S. p2
6323 - Priority over Attachment Lien p1
6323 - Priority over Attachment Lien p2
6323 - Priority over Chattel Mortgages
6323 - Priority over Landlord's Lien
6323 - Priority Recorded Mortgage p1
6323 - Priority Recorded Mortgage p2
6323 - Priority Recorded Mortgage p3
6323 - Property Subject to Lien p1
6323 - Property Subject to Lien p2
6323 - Property Subject to Lien p3
6323 - Protection of Property
6323 - Purchaser p1
6323 - Purchaser p2
6323 - Purchaser p3
6323 - Purchaser p4
6323 - Purchaser p5
6323 - Purchaser p6
6323 - Purchaser p7
6323 - Purchasers Entitled to Notice
6323 - Receivership Expenses
6323 - Recordation of Interest p1
6323 - Recordation of Interest p2
6323 - Recordation of Interest p3
6323 - Recordation of Interest p4
6323 - Recordation of Interest p5
6323 - Refiling
6323 - Release by Other Creditors
6323 - Remanded Cases
6323 - Res Judicata p1
6323 - Res Judicata p2
6323 - Revival of Judgment
6323 - Rhode Island
6323 - Rhode Island2
6323 - Seamen
6323 - Security Interest p1
6323 - Set-Off p1
6323 - Set-Off p2
6323 - Set-Off p3
6323 - Set-Off p4
6323 - Sheriff's Clerk

 

Protection of Property

Back Next

 

[41-1 USTC ¶9343]Railway Express Agency, Incorporated, a corporation, Cross-complainant, v. Charles B. Jones, et al., Cross-defendants.

In the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division., No. 15316., 10/11/40

Lien for taxes: Priority.--Where a lien was filed upon property of the taxpayer for unpaid income tax, interest and penalties, and it appeared that certain attorneys had rendered valuable services in connection with the protection of the property and the bringing of such property into the custody of the court for admin istration, it is held that there was a good tax lien against the property and that such lien is paramount and superior to claims of all other parties thereto, subject only to costs of admin istration which include the fair and reasonable value of the services rendered by the attorneys.

Edward J. Hess, 111 W. Monroe, Chicago , Ill. , for cross-complainant. M.L. Igoe , U.S. Attorney, Thomas V. Sullivan, 1 No. La Salle St. , Clement J. Wall, Jr., 111 W. Monroe, Sidley, McPherson, Austin, & Burgess, 11 So. La Salle St. , and Everett Jennings, 77 W. Washington St. , all of Chicago , Ill. , for cross-defendants.

Findings of Fact

 

SULLIVAN, D.J.:

This cause coming on for hearing, the Court having heard the evidence and heard the statements of respective counsel, makes the following Findings of Fact:

1. That the subject matter of this litigation (hereinafter called the "res") consists of the contents of thirty-six (36) shipments of money heretofore in the possession of RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INCORPORATED, and fully described in Paragraph 3 of the Amended Counter-claim in the Nature of a Bill of Interpleader, and also correctly set forth in inventory reports filed herein and made pursuant to an order of this Court by McCOY, HOLLAND, ARNDT & SWEENEY; that said res is now on deposit in the registry of this Court, less certain costs and charges which have heretofore been disbursed therefrom on specific orders of the Court.

2. That on or about the 5th day of February, 1936, there was duly assessed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue of the United States, against the defendant herein, OSCAR M. HARTZELL, as and for his income tax for the calendar year 1934 the sum of $111,068.48 and penalty thereon in the further sum of $27,767.12, and interest thereon in the sum of $5,936.84, making a total of $144,772.44; that no part of said tax, penalty and interest has been paid, except the sum of $30,073.40, leaving a balance due, owing and unpaid to the United States in the sum of $114,699.04; that on or about the 5th day of February, 1936, a Notice of Lien pursuant to Section 3186 of the Revised Statutes as Amended (U.S.C., Title 26, Sections 1560 and 1567) upon all property rights and rights to property belonging to said OSCAR M. HARTZELL was duly filed in the office of the Clerk of Cook County, and that on the 21st day of February, 1936, a Notice of Levy thereunder was duly served upon the RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INCORPORATED, who was then in possession of said res.

3. That the defendant, OSCAR M. HARTZELL, possesses sufficient proprietary interest in the res herein to make same amendable, liable and subject to distraint for his unpaid income taxes as hereinabove set forth;

4. That EDWARD J. HESS, GEORGE M. CRANE, FRANK E. McALLISTER, THOMAS V. SULLIVAN and CLEMENT J. WALL, respectively, as attorneys as shown of record for all parties hereto, except the aforesaid Collector of Internal Revenue, have rendered valuable services in connection with the protection and assembling of said res and the bringing thereof into the custody of this Court for admin istration, and in assisting the Court to properly determine the rights of various parties therein, and that the fair and reasonable values of said services are properly chargeable as an admin istration cost of said res and should be paid accordingly, and taxed as costs herein.

5. That EVERETT JENNINGS, having been appointed Guardian ad Litem for the defendant, OSCAR M. HARTZELL, has rendered valuable services herein and is entitled to fair and reasonable compensation therefor;

6. That the fair and reasonable values of the services rendered by the aforesaid attorneys and by said Guardian ad Litem, are as follows:

 

7. That the payment of said sums to the persons named respectively should be made from the aforesaid res and taxed as costs herein, and that the Attorney General of the United States and the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois have approved such payments and consented that same should be made, as costs of the admin istration of said res.

Conclusions of Law

 

And the Court hereby states the following Conclusions of Law herein:

1. That it has jurisdiction of the parties hereto and of the subject matter hereof.

2. That all parties claiming any interest in the res being admin istered herein are before the court, or are in default, as shown by the record.

3. That this Court has exclusive jurisdiction to determine all questions of title, possession, control and final disposition of the res herein, and holds jurisdiction thereof to the exclusion of all other courts;

4. That the defendant, CARTER H. HARRISON as Collector of Internal Revenue for the First Collection District of Illinois, has a good and sufficient lien against the res herein, for the unpaid income tax, interest and penalties of defendant, OSCAR M. HARTZELL, and that said lien against the res herein is paramount and superior to the claims of all other parties thereto, subject only to costs of admin istration;

5. That the equities herein are in favor of the said defendant, CARTER H. HARRISON as Collector of Internal Revenue, and against all other defendants herein, and that the said CARTER H. HARRISON as Collector of Internal Revenue for the First Collection District of Illinois is entitled to the funds constituting the res herein, less the taxed costs of admin istration as determined by the Court herein;

6. That the attorneys' fees and compensation for Guardian ad Litem found to be reasonable in the Findings of Fact are proper charges of admin istration to be taxed as costs herein.

 

 

Home ] Services ] FAQ ] Site Map ] Contact Us ]

Presented by Alvin Brown and Associates, tax attorney, formerly with the Office of the Chief Counsel of the IRS. 
Call us for all IRS tax issues, problems and emergencies
Protect yourself from IRS intimidation, errors, and penalties.
www.irstaxattorney.com - ab@irstaxattorney.com - (888) 712-7690 - (703) 425-1400