Articles by Alvin Brown Tax Preparation Offer In Compromise State Offers in Compromise Levy IRS Tax Liens IRS Tax Liens - continued IRS Tax Liens - continued 2 Levy - continued Audit Techniques Guide Congressional Contacts Criminal Investigation D.O.J Criminal Tax Manual Tax Litigation Penalty Installment Agreements Statute of Limitations Frivolous Tax Argument Interest Abatement IRS Misconduct IRS Abuses Tax Fraud Fraud Statutes Bankruptcy Tax Reform Legislation Tax Shelters Tax Court Trust Fund Penalty Legislation Innocent Spouse Relief Important Links
Tax
Shelters
Additional
Information:
IRS Notice 2001-16 FS 2005-11 IRS Notice 2003-47 IRS Notice 2000-61 IRS Notice 2002-21 IRS Notice 2001-45 IRS Notice 2001-51 Announcement 2002-2 IRS Notice 98-5 IRS Notice 99-59 IRS Notice 95-34 IRS Notice 2000-60 Revenue Ruling 99-14 Revenue Ruling 2000-12 Revenue Ruling 2004-12 IRS Notice 95-53 IRS Notice 2002-35 IRS Notice 2003-24 IRS Notice 2003-55 IRS Notice 2003-81 IRS Notice 2003-77 IRS Notice 2004-7 IRS Notice 2004-8 IRS Notice 2004-41 Revenue Ruling 2004-4 Revenue Ruling 2004-20 Announcement 2005-80 Revenue Ruling 2002-3 Revenue Ruling 2002-80 Reg 1.643(a)-8 IRS Settlement Proposal
|
Revenue
Ruling 2004-20

Rev. Rul. 2004-20 , I.R.B.
2004-10, February 13, 2004.
ISSUES
Issue 1: Can a qualified pension plan be a
plan described in §412(i)
of the Internal Revenue Code if the plan holds life
insurance contracts and annuity contracts for the
benefit of a participant that provide for benefits
at normal retirement age in excess of the
participant's benefits at normal retirement age
under the terms of the plan?
Issue 2: If a qualified pension plan holds
life insurance contracts providing for life
insurance on a participant's life in excess of the
participant's death benefit under the terms of the
plan, are contributions for premiums for such excess
life insurance coverage currently deductible by the
employer?
FACTS
Situation 1
Employer M maintains Plan A, a defined benefit plan
that is funded solely by life insurance contracts
and annuities with level annual premiums for each
participant commencing with the date the individual
becomes a participant in the plan (or, in the case
of an increase in benefits, commencing at the time
the increase becomes effective) and ending with the
individual's attainment of normal retirement age.
Plan A is intended to be a plan described in §412(i).
The amounts that will be accumulated under the
insurance contracts and annuity contracts for the
benefit of a participant at normal retirement age,
assuming premiums are paid and determined by
applying annuity purchase rates guaranteed under the
contracts, will provide for benefits in excess of
the participant's benefits at normal retirement age
under the terms of the plan.
Situation 2
Employer N maintains Plan B. With respect to
Participant P, Plan B provides a death benefit that
meets the definition of an incidental death benefit
under §1.401-1(b)(1)(i)
of the Income Tax Regulations. The assets of Plan B
include life insurance contracts on the life of
Participant P with a face amount in excess of
Participant P's death benefit under Plan B. Premiums
with respect to Participant P include an annual
premium for the waiver of the entire premium payment
if Participant P becomes disabled. Upon the death of
a covered employee, the portion of the proceeds of
the life insurance contract that exceeds the death
benefit payable to Participant P's beneficiary under
the plan is applied to the payment of premiums under
the plan with respect to other participants.
LAW
AND
ANALYSIS
Section
412 sets forth minimum funding
requirements for qualified pension plans. Section
412(i) describes certain insurance
contract plans that are exempt under §412(h)(2)
from the minimum funding requirements of §412
( section
412(i) plans). Under §411(b)(1)(F),
a plan that is funded exclusively by the purchase of
insurance contracts and satisfies the requirements
of §412(i)(2)
and (3)
satisfies the accrual requirements of §411(b)
if an employee's accrued benefit as of any
applicable date is not less than the cash surrender
value his life insurance contracts would have on
that applicable date if the requirements of §412(i)(4)
through (6)
were satisfied.
A section
412(i) plan must be funded by the
purchase of individual or group insurance contracts.
Section
412(i)(2) requires contracts held by a section
412(i) plan to provide for level annual
premium payments to be paid commencing with the date
the individual became a participant in the plan (or,
in the case of an increase in benefits, commencing
at the time the increase becomes effective) and
extending not later than the retirement age for each
individual participating in the plan. Section
412(i)(3) requires benefits provided
under a section
412(i) plan to be equal to the benefits
provided under each contract at normal retirement
age under the plan.
Under §1.412(i)-1(b)(2)(iii),
the benefits for each participant provided under a section
412(i) plan that holds individual
insurance contracts must be equal to the benefits
provided under the participant's individual
contracts at the participant's normal retirement age
under the plan. Furthermore, under §1.412(i)-1(b)(2)(iv),
the benefits provided by the plan for each
individual participant must be guaranteed by the
life insurance company issuing the individual
contracts to the extent premiums have been paid.
Section
404(a)(1)(A)(i) provides that the amount
necessary to satisfy the minimum funding requirement
under §412
is deductible even if it is greater than the amount
determined under §404(a)(1)(A)(ii)
or (iii), whichever is applicable with respect to
the plan.
The alternative limit determined under §404(a)(1)(A)(ii)
is the amount necessary to provide the remaining
unfunded cost of all participants' past and current
service credits as a level amount, or as a level
percentage of compensation, over the remaining
future service of each participant. However, if the
remaining unfunded cost with respect to any three
individuals is more than 50 percent of all remaining
unfunded cost, the amount attributable to those
individuals is distributed over a period of at least
five years.
The alternative limit determined under §404(a)(1)(A)(iii)
is the normal cost of the plan plus, if past service
or other supplementary pension or annuity credits
are provided by the plan, the amount necessary to
amortize the unfunded costs attributable to those
credits in equal annual payments over 10 years.
Under §1.404(a)-6(a)(2)
of the Income Tax Regulations, the normal cost for
any year is defined as the amount actuarially
determined which would be required as a contribution
by the employer in such year to maintain the plan if
the plan had been in effect from the beginning of
service of each then included employee and if such
costs for prior years had been paid and all
assumptions as to interest, mortality, time of
payment, etc., had been fulfilled.
Section
1.404(a)-3(b) provides that in no event
shall the limitations under §404(a)(1)
for pension or annuity plans exceed costs based on
assumptions and methods that are reasonable in view
of the funding medium and reasonable expectations as
to the effects of mortality, interest, and other
pertinent factors.
Section
1.404(a)-14 provides rules for
determining the deductible limits under §404(a)(1)(A)(i),
(ii), and (iii). The regulations provide in general
that the limit on deductible amounts contributed for
an employer's taxable year is based on the amounts
determined for purposes of §412
for the applicable plan year or years.
Section
404(a)(1)(E) provides that an amount
contributed to a plan that would otherwise be
deductible, but that exceeds the limitations of §404(a)(1),
is deductible in future years to the extent of the
difference between the amount contributed and the
maximum amount deductible for each succeeding year
under §404(a)(1).
Section
4972 generally imposes a 10-percent
excise tax on nondeductible contributions to a
qualified plan, including nondeductible
contributions carried over from preceding years.
Rev.
Rul. 94-75, 1994-2 C.B. 59, discusses the
tax consequences of converting a qualified defined
benefit plan that is not a section
412(i) plan to a section
412(i) plan, and holds that the
deductible limit under §404(a)(1)(A)(iii)
applies to a section
412(i) plan.
Rev.
Rul. 55-748, 1955-2 C.B. 234, discusses
the deductibility of contributions to a qualified
plan that are used to pay life insurance premiums
attributable to the life insurance benefits of
retirement income contracts purchased with respect
to employees by the trust, the proceeds of which,
upon the death of an employee, are payable to the
trustee and are held by the trustee for application
to payment of subsequent premiums on similar
contracts on behalf of other employees. Rev.
Rul. 55-748 holds that the part of the
employer's contribution attributable to the purchase
of life insurance benefits, which, when they become
payable, are applicable to the reduction of
subsequent employer contributions to the plan are
not considered as a cost of the pension plan for the
purpose of determining the limitation on deductions
under §404(a)(1)(A),
(B),
and (C)
of the Code (the predecessor provisions to current §§404(a)(1)(A)(i),
(ii), and (iii)) for the year in which such
contributions are paid, and cannot be deducted as
such. Rev.
Rul. 55-748 further provides that
contributions attributable to such insurance
benefits, not otherwise determined, may be
determined by applying the rates provided in Rev.
Rul. 55-747, 1955-2 C.B. 228, to the
amounts of insurance that would revert to the trust
in the event of death of the insured employee in the
year for which the premiums are paid. In later
years, if an employer for any reason, such as the
receipt by the trustee of life insurance proceeds
under a retirement income contract because of the
death of an employee, which proceeds were applied to
the payment of premiums on similar contracts for the
benefit of other employees, contributes to the trust
a sum less than the maximum deduction permitted for
that year under §404(a)(1)(A),
(B),
or (C),
Rev.
Rul. 55-748 provides that the employer
may deduct in that year, in addition to this current
contribution, the contributions made in prior years
and not then deductible because they were
attributable to that part of the retirement income
contracts that would provide life insurance payable
to the trustee, to the extent of the difference
between his current contribution and his maximum
deduction permitted under §404(a)(1)(A),
(B),
or (C).
Rev.
Rul. 55-747 provided a table to be used
in computing the premiums to be included in the
income of an employee on account of current life
insurance protection provided for the employee under
a life or endowment insurance contract held by an
employees' trust qualified under §401(a).
Rev.
Rul. 66-110, 1966-1 C.B. 12, provided
that the current published premium rates charged by
an insurer for individual 1-year term life insurance
available to all standard risks may be used for
determining the cost of insurance in connection with
individual policies issued by the same insurer and
held by an employees' trust qualified under §401(a).
In addition, Rev.
Rul. 66-110 extended the table of
premiums set forth in Rev.
Rul. 55-747 to cover additional ages.
Rev.
Rul. 67-154, 1967-1 C.B. 11, amplified Rev.
Rul. 66-110 and held that, where an
insurer published one-year term insurance rates
lower than those set forth in Rev.
Rul. 55-747, but those rates were
applicable only under a dividend option whereby term
insurance may be purchased with dividends on
existing policies and were lower than the insurer's
published rates for initial insurance available to
all standard risks, those rates could not be used in
place of the rates set forth in Rev.
Rul. 55-747 in determining the cost of
insurance under a trust described in §401(a).
Notice
2001-10, 2001-1 C.B. 459, revoked Rev.
Rul. 55-747, and provided a new table
(Table 2001) to be used in valuing term life
insurance coverage provided to an employee. Under Notice
2001-10, taxpayers could continue to use
the rates set forth in Rev.
Rul. 55-747 for purposes of determining
the value of current life insurance protection
provided under a qualified retirement plan for
taxable years ending on or before December 31, 2001.
In addition, Notice
2001-10 provided generally that taxpayers
could continue to determine the value of current
life insurance protection by using the insurer's
lower published rates available to standard risks as
provided in Rev.
Rul. 66-110. However, for periods after
December 31, 2003, Notice
2001-10 sets forth certain additional
conditions on the use of the insurer's published
rates.
Notice
2002-8, 2002-1 C.B. 398, revokes Notice
2001-10. Under Notice
2002-8, Rev.
Rul. 55-747 remains revoked; however,
taxpayers can use the rates set forth in Rev.
Rul. 55-747 for purposes of determining
the value of current life insurance protection
provided under a qualified retirement plan for
taxable years ending on or before December 31, 2001.
Notice
2002-8 republishes Table 2001 and
provides that Table 2001 can be used to determine
the value of current life insurance protection on a
single life that is provided under a qualified plan
for arrangements entered into before the effective
date of future guidance. In addition, paragraph 3 of
Section
III
of Notice
2002-8 placed conditions on the use of
the insurer's lower published rates under Rev.
Rul. 66-110, as amplified by Rev.
Rul. 67-154, for periods after December
31, 2003, with respect to arrangements entered into
after January 28, 2002.
Rev.
Rul. 2003-105, 2003-40 I.R.B. 696,
obsoleted Rev.
Rul. 66-110 for arrangements entered into
after September 17, 2003, except as provided in
paragraph 3 of Section
III
of Notice
2002-8. Accordingly, Rev.
Rul. 66-110, as amplified by Rev.
Rul. 67-154, remains in effect until
future guidance is issued for life insurance
provided under a qualified retirement plan, subject
to the conditions provided by Notice
2002-8 with respect to arrangements
entered into after January 28, 2002.
Section
1.401-1(b)(1)(i) provides that a pension
plan within the meaning of §401(a)
is a plan established and maintained by an employer
primarily to provide systematically for the payment
of definitely determinable benefits to employees
over a period of years, usually for life, after
retirement. A pension plan may also provide for the
payment of incidental death benefits through
insurance or otherwise.
Rev.
Rul. 74-307, 1974-2 C.B. 126, holds that
preretirement death benefits under a qualified
pension plan are considered incidental death
benefits within the meaning of §1.401-1(b)(1)(i)
if less than 50 percent of the employer contribution
credited to each participant's account is used to
purchase ordinary life insurance policies on the
participant's life, or if the total death benefit
before normal retirement date does not exceed the
greater of (a) the proceeds of ordinary life
insurance policies providing a death benefit of 100
times the anticipated monthly normal retirement
benefit, or (b) the sum of (i) the reserve under the
ordinary life insurance policies plus (ii) the
participant's account in the auxiliary fund. See
also Rev.
Rul. 68-453, 1968-2 C.B. 163.
Rev.
Rul. 81-162, 1981-1 C.B. 169, holds that
a plan established by an employer that provides
employees only such benefits as are afforded through
the purchase of ordinary life insurance contracts
(other than retirement income contracts), which are
converted to life annuities at normal retirement
age, does not constitute a pension plan within the
meaning of §401(a).
Rev.
Rul. 81-162 provides that the primary
purpose of such a life insurance contract is to
provide life insurance protection, and the reserve
accumulated thereon is a result of premium payments
being made on a level basis. Rev.
Rul. 81-162 reasons that such reserve
will provide a relatively small retirement annuity
in comparison with the annuity that a retirement
income contract of the same face amount will
provide. Therefore, Rev.
Rul. 81-162 concludes that a plan
providing only for the purchase of ordinary life
insurance contracts (other than retirement income
contracts) is not primarily for the payment of
benefits to employees over a period of years after
retirement. This analysis would not apply, however,
if the death benefit payable to the beneficiary
under the plan were limited to an incidental death
benefit, with the remaining benefit payable to the
plan.
In Situation 1, Plan A is not a plan
described in §412(i)
because the participant's benefit under Plan A
payable at normal retirement age is not equal to the
amount provided at normal retirement age with
respect to the contracts held on behalf of the
participant, and thus, Plan A fails to satisfy the
requirements of §412(i)(3).
Accordingly, Plan A is subject to the requirements
of §412,
with charges and credits to the funding standard
account determined using the reasonable funding
method selected for the plan under generally
applicable rules, and using reasonable actuarial
assumptions. Such reasonable funding method and such
reasonable actuarial assumptions are also used to
determine the deductible amount of contributions
under the generally applicable rules of §404(a).
In addition, the exception from the accrual rules
that applies to §412(i)
plans under §411(b)(1)(F)
does not apply to Plan A.
In Situation 2, the fact that the life
insurance contracts on the life of Participant P
provide for death benefits in excess of the death
benefits under the plan would not cause Plan B to
fail to satisfy the requirements to be a plan
described in §412(i),
if Plan B otherwise met those requirements.
Similarly, the fact that the life insurance
contracts on the life of Participant P provide for
death benefits that would fail to satisfy the
incidental benefit rule of §1.401-1(b)(1)(i)
if payable to Participant P's beneficiary under the
plan does not cause Plan B to fail to satisfy the
incidental death benefit rule of §1.401-1(b)(1)(i)
because those excess death benefits under the life
insurance contracts are not payable to Participant
P's beneficiary under the plan. However, a portion
of Employer N's contributions under Plan B is
attributable to the purchase of life insurance
coverage held by Plan B that is in excess of the
incidental death benefit payable under Plan B. Under
Rev.
Rul. 55-748, the portion of Employer N's
contributions that is attributable to such excess
life insurance coverage does not constitute normal
cost, and is not deductible as part of normal cost
for the taxable year in which contributed. Rather,
that portion of Employer N's contributions is used
to provide a source of funds to pay future premiums
(i.e., premiums on other participants) that will
come due after the death of Participant P.
Accordingly, the nondeductible portion of Employer
N's contributions under Plan B that is paid for life
insurance protection for Participant P is carried
over pursuant to the rules of §404(a)(1)(E)
to be treated as contributions under the rules of §404(a)(1)(E)
in later years and deductible when the employer
contributions are less than the maximum deductible
limit (e.g., in years in which excess death benefits
under Plan B are used to satisfy Employer N's
obligation to pay future premiums on other
participants). Similarly, Employer N's contributions
to pay premiums for the disability waiver for
Participant P do not constitute normal cost, and are
not deductible as part of normal cost for the
taxable year in which contributed. Rather, that
portion of Employer N's contributions is used to
provide a source of funds to pay future premiums
that will come due after Participant P becomes
disabled. Accordingly, the nondeductible portion of
Employer N's contributions under Plan B that is paid
for the disability waiver for Participant P is
carried over pursuant to the rules of §404(a)(1)(E)
to be treated as contributions under the rules of §404(a)(1)(E)
in later years and deductible when the employer
contributions are less than the maximum deductible
limit (e.g., if and when Participant P becomes
disabled).
In general, the premiums for excess life insurance
coverage that are not currently part of normal cost
under §404(a)(1)(A)
are determined in a manner consistent with total
premiums under the contract (i.e., must be spread in
a level manner over the premium payment period).
However, if the premiums for the life insurance
contracts covering a participant are level annual
premiums payable beginning with the participant's
participation in the plan and ending at the
participant's normal retirement age, this excess
amount can be determined by applying the appropriate
term cost factors to the excess term coverage.
Nondeductible contributions are subject to the
excise tax of §4972
as provided thereunder. In determining the amount of
premiums for excess life insurance coverage, Table
2001 is applicable for taxable years ending after
December 31, 2001, and the table set forth in Rev.
Rul. 55-747 is used for earlier periods.
In addition, the current published premium rates
charged by an insurer for individual 1-year term
life insurance available to all standard risks as
described in Rev.
Rul. 66-110, as amplified by Rev.
Rul. 67-154, can be used for taxable
years ending on or before December 31, 2003. For
arrangements entered into on or before January 28,
2002, such current published premium rates can
continue to be used for periods ending after
December 31, 2003. However, for arrangements entered
into after January 28, 2002, such current published
premium rates can continue to be used for periods
ending after December 31, 2003 only if the
additional requirements of Notice
2002-8 are satisfied.
HOLDING
A qualified pension plan cannot be a section
412(i) plan if the plan holds life
insurance contracts and annuity contracts for the
benefit of a participant that provide for benefits
at normal retirement age in excess of the
participant's benefits at normal retirement age
under the terms of the plan.
Employer contributions under a qualified defined
benefit plan that are used to purchase life
insurance coverage for a participant in excess of
the participant's death benefit provided under the
plan are not fully deductible when contributed, but
are carried over to be treated as contributions in
future years and deductible in future years when
other contributions to the plan that are taken into
account for the taxable year are less than the
maximum amount deductible for the year pursuant to
the limits of §404.
LISTED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions that are the same as, or substantially
similar to, the transaction described in Situation 2
of this revenue ruling are identified as
"listed transactions"for purposes of §1.6011-4(b)(2)
of the Income Tax Regulations and §301.6111-2(b)(2)
and §301.6112-1(b)(2) of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations effective February 13,
2004, the date this revenue ruling was released to
the public, provided that the employer has deducted
amounts used to pay premiums on a life insurance
contract for a participant with a death benefit
under the contract that exceeds the participant's
death benefit under the plan by more than $100,000.
It should be noted that, independent of any
classification as "listed transactions"
for purposes of §§1.6011-4(b)(2),
301.6111-2(b)(2), and 301.6112-1(b)(2) of the
regulations, arrangements that are the same as, or
substantially similar to, the arrangements described
in this notice may already be subject to the
disclosure requirements of §6011
of the Code, the tax shelter registration
requirements of §6111,
or the list maintenance requirements of §6112
( §§1.6011-4,
301.6111-1T, 301.6111-2, and 301.6112-1).
Persons who are required to satisfy the registration
requirement of §§6111
of the Code with respect to the arrangements
described in this notice and who fail to do so may
be subject to the penalty under §6707(a).
Persons who are required to satisfy the list-keeping
requirement of §6112
with respect to the arrangements and who fail to do
so may be subject to the penalty under §6708(a).
In addition, the Service may impose penalties on
participants in these arrangements or substantially
similar arrangements, including the accuracy-related
penalty under §6662.
EFFECT ON OTHER RULINGS
Rev.
Rul. 55-748 is modified and superseded.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal authors of this revenue ruling are
Larry Isaacs of the Employee Plans, Tax Exempt and
Government Entities Division, and Linda Marshall of
the Office of the Division Counsel/Associate Chief
Counsel, Tax Exempt and Government Entities. For
further information regarding this revenue
procedure, please contact the Employee Plans
taxpayer assistance telephone service at
1-877-829-5500 (a toll-free number) between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Eastern Time,
Monday through Friday. Mr. Isaacs may be reached at
(202) 283-9888, and Ms. Marshall may be reached at
(202) 622-6090 (not toll-free numbers).
|